博客

  • 伊朗战争,11天:美国掌控制空权,油价飙升,地区为下一步行动做准备


    赫格塞斯称,随着油价攀升至每桶100美元以上,美国和以色列军队现在在关键走廊自由行动

    作者:摩根·菲利普斯
    福克斯新闻

    2026年3月10日,美国东部时间上午9:12发布

    与伊朗开战一周后,美国官员表示,美国和以色列军队正朝着”完全控制”伊朗领空的方向推进——这为更深层次的打击、更广泛的目标清单和一场似乎在扩大而非降温的冲突铺平了道路。

    在本周的吹风会上,战争部长皮特·赫格塞斯秘书和参谋长联席会议主席丹·凯恩将军描述了他们所谓的关键走廊上空几乎无争议的领空,这一转变使得持续的轰炸行动能够深入伊朗境内。

    “我们以压倒性和坚定不移的目标导向取得胜利,”赫格塞斯在周二上午的新闻发布会上表示。

    凯恩表示,美军在行动的头10天内已打击了5000多个目标,其中包括数十个深埋的导弹发射装置,使用了2000磅的穿透炸弹。

    来自华盛顿的信息传递出压倒性的军事优势。

    但更广泛的图景——油价上涨、无人机战争扩大、对能源和民用基础设施的打击,以及波及北约领土的地区溢出效应——表明,尽管美国官员对其发展轨迹充满信心,但冲突的范围正在扩大。

    德黑兰领导层强硬化

    在冲突加剧之际,伊朗专家会议选举已故阿亚图拉·阿里·哈梅内伊的儿子穆贾塔巴·哈梅内伊为该国新最高领袖,在关键时刻巩固了神职人员机构和伊斯兰革命卫队内部的权力。

    这一继位是1979年革命以来的第二次,表明伊朗的立场将延续而非重新调整。穆贾塔巴·哈梅内伊长期以来被视为潜在接班人,与伊朗安全机构内的强硬派密切结盟。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统批评这一选择,称领导层更迭不会改变美国的目标,并暗示这反映了华盛顿一直试图削弱的同样根深蒂固的权力结构。政府已明确表示,无论谁担任最高领袖,军事行动都将继续。

    这一过渡似乎强化了长期对抗的可能性,而非开启外交缓和的途径。

    “无争议的领空”

    赫格塞斯周二表示,美国和以色列已在伊朗上空实现”全面空中优势”,并”以残酷的效率取得决定性胜利”。

    “这并不意味着他们不会投射力量,”赫格塞斯说。”这并不意味着我们的防空人员仍然不需要防御。他们确实需要。但这是能力退化的有力证据。”

    “目前,他们的大多数高端地对空导弹系统已不再构成威胁,”凯恩说。

    “战斗机正相对不受惩罚地深入行动,”他补充道,同时指出”总是存在一些风险”。

    美军中央司令部负责人布拉德·库珀海军上将也报告称,伊朗弹道导弹发射量较冲突初期下降了约90%,无人机袭击下降了80%以上,他将这一下降归因于对发射装置和基础设施的持续打击。

    尽管如此,官员们警告称,空中优势并不意味着所有威胁都能被阻止。伊朗仍在继续发射导弹和无人机,其中一些需要在该地区进行拦截。

    弹药和策略的转变

    赫格塞斯表示,这场战役正在从战斧巡航导弹等昂贵的防区外武器转向500磅、1000磅和2000磅的精确制导重力炸弹——他表示,这一转变反映了伊朗地对空导弹系统在关键区域已被压制的信心。

    他称美国此类炸弹的库存”几乎无限”,并警告称华盛顿的时间表”由我们单独控制”。

    强调重力炸弹不仅仅是修辞。这标志着向持续、高强度行动的转变,不仅旨在打击活跃威胁,还旨在削弱伊朗重建其导弹部队的能力。

    无人机重新定义战争

    尽管导弹发射减少,无人系统仍然是这场战争的核心。

    伊朗大量依赖无人机——包括沙希德式游荡弹药——打击能源设施、施压美国基地并扰乱霍尔木兹海峡附近的航运。与弹道导弹相比,无人机成本更低、更容易大量部署,使德黑兰能够在其他地方遭受损失的同时维持压力。

    作为回应,美国已向该地区部署了一套经乌克兰战场检验的反无人机拦截系统。乌克兰专家借鉴在俄乌战争中防御伊朗设计无人机的经验,协助加强基地防护。

    无人机战斗凸显了一个关键动态:尽管美军可能在天空占主导地位,但低成本无人系统仍然可以制造风险并考验防空系统。

    能源面临风险

    霍尔木兹海峡——全球约20%的石油和主要液化天然气运输通道——已成为这场战争最关键的热点之一。

    无人机袭击和伊朗威胁已大幅减少商业交通,推高保险成本,并迫使一些船只改道。由于担心中断可能持续,油价已攀升至每桶100美元以上。

    以色列对伊朗石油设施的打击,以及伊朗对该地区能源基础设施的报复性打击,表明能源资产现在成为活跃目标。有关打击影响供水和海水淡化厂的报道进一步表明,战争正扩大到严格军事设施之外。

    如果霍尔木兹海峡的不稳定持续数周,分析师警告称全球能源市场可能迅速趋紧,导致美国汽油价格上涨和新一轮通胀压力。

    特朗普周一警告称,如果伊朗威胁霍尔木兹海峡的船只,美国将”比目前打击力度强20倍”。

    北约邻近地区与地区反弹

    战争已接近北约领土。两枚伊朗弹道导弹在土耳其领空附近被拦截,增加了更广泛联盟参与的风险。

    伊朗还袭击了阿塞拜疆,遭到巴库的强烈谴责和土耳其的愤怒——土耳其是阿塞拜疆最亲密的盟友。值得注意的是,尽管伊朗在军事上升级,但尚未看到统一的地区集团为其辩护。

    工业动员

    尽管赫格塞斯断言某些进攻性弹药充足,但维持防空和导弹防御行动资源密集,而高端拦截弹的库存在冲突开始前已面临压力。

    伊朗试图削弱与萨德和爱国者电池等平台相关的雷达系统。尽管美军指挥官表示发射率急剧下降,但拦截弹成本高昂且产量有限。

    特朗普上周召集主要国防承包商,敦促加快拦截弹及相关系统的生产。如果行动以目前速度持续,扩大产量可能需要国会资金支持。

    战场现在已从发射场扩展到供应链。

    伤亡人数上升

    五角大楼证实,已有7名美军士兵在伊朗袭击中丧生,8人重伤。

    在美国方面的报道中,伊朗50多名高级领导人,包括最高领袖阿里·哈梅内伊,已被”消灭”。伊朗方面则称有超过1000人在打击中丧生,约175人(包括许多学童)在米纳布一所女子小学的袭击中丧生。

    尚无组织声称对此次袭击负责,调查仍在进行中。

    这一事件加剧了随着冲突扩大对平民保护的审查。

    没有快速缓和的途径

    战争进行仅一周多一点,轨迹显示的是扩大而非遏制。

    美国官员对空中优势和持续打击能力充满信心。伊朗领导层在强硬派接班人领导下巩固权力。能源市场动荡。无人机战争继续考验防御系统。冲突已触及北约领土并打击民用基础设施。

    核心问题是冲突将蔓延多远,以及军事势头能否超过该地区不断累积的经济和地缘政治成本。

    Iran war, 11 days in: US controls skies, oil surges and the region braces for what’s next

    Hegseth says American and Israeli forces now operate freely across key corridors as oil prices climb above $100 per barrel

    By Morgan Phillips
    Fox News

    Published March 10, 2026 9:12am EDT

    One week into the war with Iran, U.S. officials say American and Israeli forces are moving toward “complete control” of Iranian airspace — clearing the way for deeper strikes, a broader target list and a conflict that appears to be expanding rather than winding down.

    In briefings this week, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine described what they called near-uncontested airspace over key corridors, a shift that allows sustained bombing operations deep inside Iran.

    “We are winning with an overwhelming and unrelenting focus on our objectives,” Hegseth said in a press briefing Tuesday morning.

    Caine said U.S. forces have now struck more than 5,000 targets in the first 10 days of operations, including dozens of deeply buried missile launchers hit with 2,000-pound penetrating bombs.

    The message from Washington is one of overwhelming military advantage.

    But the broader picture, rising oil prices, expanding drone warfare, strikes on energy and civilian infrastructure, and regional spillover touching NATO territory, suggests a conflict that is growing in scope even as U.S. officials project confidence in its trajectory.

    Leadership hardens in Tehran

    Amid the intensifying conflict, Iran’s Assembly of Experts has selected Mojtaba Khamenei — son of the recently deceased Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — as the country’s new supreme leader, consolidating authority within the clerical establishment and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps at a pivotal moment.

    The succession, only the second since the 1979 revolution, signals continuity rather than recalibration in Iran’s posture. Mojtaba Khamenei had long been viewed as a potential successor and is closely aligned with hard-line factions inside Iran’s security apparatus.

    President Donald Trump criticized the selection, saying the leadership change would not alter U.S. objectives and suggesting it reflects the same entrenched power structure Washington has sought to weaken. The administration has made clear that military operations will continue regardless of who occupies the supreme leader’s office.

    Rather than opening a diplomatic off-ramp, the transition appears to reinforce the likelihood of a prolonged confrontation.

    ‘Uncontested airspace’

    Hegseth said Tuesday that the U.S. and Israel had achieved “total air dominance” over Iran and were “winning decisively with brutal efficiency.”

    “That doesn’t mean they won’t be able to project,” Hegseth said. “It doesn’t mean our air defenders still don’t have to defend. They do. But that is strong evidence of degradation.”

    “Most of their higher-end surface-to-air missile systems are not factors at this point in time,” Caine said.

    “Fighters are moving deeper with relative impunity,” he added, noting there is “always some risk.”

    One week into the war with Iran, U.S. officials say American and Israeli forces are moving toward “complete control” of Iranian airspace.(Sasan / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images)

    Adm. Brad Cooper, head of the U.S. military’s Central Command, also reported that Iranian ballistic missile launches had dropped by roughly 90% from the opening days of the conflict, while drone attacks had fallen by more than 80%, attributing the decline to sustained strikes on launchers and infrastructure.

    Still, officials have cautioned that air superiority does not mean every threat can be stopped. Iranian missiles and drones continue to be launched, and some have required interception across the region.

    A shift in munitions and message

    Hegseth said the campaign is transitioning from expensive standoff weapons like Tomahawk cruise missiles to 500-, 1,000- and 2,000-pound precision gravity bombs — a shift he said reflects confidence that Iranian surface-to-air missile systems have been suppressed in key areas.

    He described the U.S. stockpile of such bombs as “nearly unlimited” and warned that Washington’s timeline “is ours and ours alone to control.”

    The emphasis on gravity bombs is more than rhetorical. It signals a move toward sustained, high-tempo operations designed not only to hit active threats, but to degrade Iran’s ability to regenerate its missile force.

    Drones redefine the fight

    Even as missile launches decline, unmanned systems remain central to the war.

    Iran has leaned heavily on drones — including Shahed-style loitering munitions — to strike energy facilities, pressure U.S. bases and disrupt shipping near the Strait of Hormuz. Compared to ballistic missiles, drones are cheaper and easier to deploy in volume, allowing Tehran to sustain pressure despite losses elsewhere.

    In response, the United States has deployed a Ukraine-tested counter-drone interceptor system to the region. Ukrainian specialists, drawing on experience defending against Iranian-designed drones used in the Russia-Ukraine war, are assisting in strengthening base protection.

    The drone fight underscores a key dynamic: while U.S. forces may dominate the skies, lower-cost unmanned systems can still impose risk and strain air defenses.

    Energy at risk

    The Strait of Hormuz — through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil and major liquefied natural gas shipments transit — has become one of the most consequential flash points of the war.

    Drone attacks and Iranian threats have sharply reduced commercial traffic, driving up insurance costs and forcing some vessels to reroute. Oil prices have climbed above $100 per barrel amid fears that disruptions could persist.

    Israeli strikes on Iranian oil facilities, and Iran’s retaliatory targeting of regional energy infrastructure, signal that energy assets are now active targets. Reports of strikes affecting water and desalination plants further suggest the war is expanding beyond strictly military sites.

    Iran’s Assembly of Experts has selected Mojtaba Khamenei — son of the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — as the country’s new supreme leader.(Photo by Reza B / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images)

    If instability on Hormuz stretches for weeks, analysts warn global energy markets could tighten quickly, translating into higher gasoline prices and renewed inflation pressure in the United States.

    Trump warned Monday that Iran will be hit “20 times harder” than it already has if it threatens ships in the Strait.

    NATO proximity and regional backlash

    The war has edged closer to NATO territory. Two Iranian ballistic missiles were intercepted near Turkish airspace, raising the risk of broader alliance involvement.

    Iran has also struck Azerbaijan, drawing sharp condemnation from Baku and angering Turkey, Azerbaijan’s closest ally. Notably, Iran has not seen a unified regional bloc mobilize in its defense, highlighting its relative diplomatic isolation even as it escalates militarily.

    Industrial mobilization

    Despite Hegseth’s assertion that certain offensive munitions are plentiful, sustaining air and missile defense operations is resource-intensive, and inventories of high-end interceptors were already under strain before the conflict began.

    Iran has attempted to degrade radar systems tied to platforms such as THAAD and Patriot batteries.(Reuters/U.S. Army/Capt. Adan Cazarez)

    Iran has attempted to degrade radar systems tied to platforms such as THAAD and Patriot batteries. While U.S. commanders say launch rates have declined sharply, interceptors are expensive and produced in limited quantities.

    Trump convened major defense contractors last week to press for accelerated production of interceptors and related systems. Expanding output could require congressional funding if the campaign continues at its current pace.

    The battlefield now extends beyond launch sites and into supply chains.

    Rising casualties

    The Pentagon has confirmed seven U.S. service members have been killed and eight seriously injured in Iranian strikes.

    In Iran, the U.S. claims over 50 top Iranian leaders, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, have been taken out. Iran claims more than 1,000 people have been killed in the strikes and approximately 175 people, including many schoolchildren, were killed in an attack on a girls’ elementary school in Minab.

    No group has claimed responsibility, and investigations are ongoing.

    The incident has intensified scrutiny over civilian protection as the conflict widens.

    No quick off-ramp

    A little more than one week in, the trajectory points toward expansion rather than containment.

    U.S. officials project confidence in air dominance and sustained strike capacity. Iranian leadership has consolidated under a hard-line successor. Energy markets are volatile. Drone warfare continues to test defenses. The conflict has brushed NATO territory and struck civilian infrastructure.

    The central question is how far the conflict will spread, and whether military momentum can outpace the economic and geopolitical costs mounting across the region.

  • 司法部酝酿起诉前中情局局长的案件考验其起诉特朗普政敌的努力


    2026-03-10T14:35:57.295Z / CNN

    知情人士向CNN透露,司法部检察官正在牵头调查前中央情报局局长约翰·布伦南,司法部高层正面临越来越大的压力,要求对其提起刑事指控。此前,司法部在试图惩罚特朗普总统眼中的敌人时屡屡受挫。

    迈阿密美国检察官办公室的检察官一直领导着对布伦南的调查,该调查与这位前情报主管2023年向国会提供的证词以及多年前的俄罗斯调查有关,已发出两轮传票传唤几名证人。

    然而,推进指控的努力遇到了佛罗里达州南部职业检察官的反对,一些人认为这一潜在案件相对薄弱。

    广告反馈

    布伦南的律师几个月来一直为可能的起诉做准备,但起诉尚未实现。

    知情人士称,司法部官员和美国检察官杰森·雷丁·基尼奥内斯在1月份曾推动对布伦南提起诉讼,但佛罗里达州南区的一些职业检察官抵制了这一压力。

    消息来源之一称,这些职业检察官现在正面临新一轮压力,正努力推迟将案件提交大陪审团。

    去年年底,检察官们从布伦南和其他前情报官员那里收集了文件。传票特别要求提供2017年关于俄罗斯干预选举的情报报告的相关信息,布伦南参与了该报告的工作,并在2023年的国会证词中谈到了这份报告。

    最近有两位知情人士告诉CNN,1月份发出的第二轮传票传唤了几名前政府官员,并要求提供多年的文件,包括他们不再能接触到的2016年俄罗斯调查的政府记录。一位消息人士称,至少有一名前情报界官员已在调查中接受采访。

    尽管布伦南仍可能面临大陪审团的调查,但调查也可能失败。

    他的律师表示,例如,伪证指控毫无根据。

    司法部发言人拒绝置评,称不评论正在进行的调查。

    过去一年,在提交给大陪审团的情况下,针对总统政治对手的多项调查均以失败告终。其他调查已启动,但尚未提出刑事指控——让目标人物数月来一直处于悬而未决的状态。

    但即使案件最终未形成指控,也可能对相关人员的生活造成干扰,因为那些认为自己正在被检察官和大陪审团调查的人担心其公众声誉受损。

    律师费用不断增加,不过据华盛顿特区法律界几位消息人士透露,在特朗普最受政治关注的刑事案件中,一些人获得了低成本或免费的法律援助或财务支持。

    虽然任何政府都存在这种情况,但特朗普领导的司法部更积极地起诉民主党政治人物或特朗普及其他高级官员公开表示希望起诉的人。

    11月,特朗普在社交媒体帖子中(科米被起诉后不久)称布伦南、前联邦调查局局长科米及其他几人是“奥巴马的俄罗斯骗局叛国俱乐部”成员。

    联邦调查局局长卡什·帕特尔也发表了类似的公开声明。

    “我们将继续让科米、布伦南、克拉珀、佩奇、斯特佐克等许多人以及其他人士为我认为的其犯罪行为负责,”帕特尔在最近的一次播客中表示,点名的这些人目前都未面临任何指控,但特朗普曾多次公开抨击他们。(前联邦调查局特工彼得·斯特佐克、律师莉萨·佩奇和国家情报总监詹姆斯·克拉珀是调查特朗普2016年竞选活动的关键人物。)

    在一些涉及政治问题的地区,备受尊敬的职业调查人员和检察官被大规模解雇,取而代之的是更愿意配合但经验不足的一线调查人员。

    起诉特朗普希望成功的悬而未决的案件或调查,对检察官或司法部其他律师来说有其自身的后果。

    弗吉尼亚州联邦检察官曾两次试图对科米提起刑事指控,三次试图起诉纽约州总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯,这些指控要么被法官驳回,要么被大陪审团拒绝。

    大陪审团拒绝起诉在历史上是非常不寻常的结果——尽管在特朗普希望推进的政治案件中这种情况越来越频繁。

    华盛顿特区的一个大陪审团最近拒绝了司法部对民主党参议员马克·凯利和其他五名国会议员提起刑事诉讼的请求,原因是他们录制了一段视频,提醒军方和情报官员可以拒绝他们认为违法的命令。

    另一名被司法部试图起诉但未成功的国会议员艾丽莎·斯洛特金众议员表示:“这是一个由匿名美国公民组成的大陪审团,他们维护了法治,认定此案不应继续。” “(美国检察官让娜·皮罗)是否成功不是重点。重点是特朗普总统继续将我们的司法系统武器化,针对他眼中的敌人。”

    其他几位特朗普的政治对手也成为调查的对象,但尚未提起诉讼。

    据几位人士透露,近几周,联邦执法部门正在重新审查前检察官的工作,这些工作最终成为特别检察官杰克·史密斯针对特朗普的案件的一部分。帕特尔还发表了一份重要公开声明。

    CNN此前曾证实,司法部正在调查众议院议员亚当·希夫和联邦储备委员会理事莉萨·库克的财务文件,以及联邦储备委员会主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的参议院证词。

    国会共和党人还通过推荐一名曾在特朗普特别检察官办公室工作的前检察官和1月6日事件中的一名前明星证人可能面临刑事指控,增加了司法部可能调查的对象范围。

    这些人都没有被起诉。

    鲍威尔在收到刑事传票后发表视频声明时表示:“这一前所未有的行动应放在政府威胁和持续压力的大背景下看待。” 他指出特朗普对美联储控制的贷款利率不满。

    他补充说:“这一新的威胁与我去年6月的证词或美联储大楼的翻新无关,这些只是借口。”

    公开谴责


    美联储主席在回应公开刑事调查时的公开表态,已成为华盛顿宣传大陪审团审判的策略之一。

    在过去的政府中,司法部和政府官员不太愿意就未被起诉的事项或可能被调查的人发表评论。案件可能悄无声息地持续数年。

    现在情况不同了。特朗普本人在社交媒体上多次公布他希望司法部起诉的人的名字,司法部长和其他司法部高级官员也多次就正在进行的调查发表评论。

    CNN此前报道,1月份特朗普在白宫会见美国检察官时,抱怨对包括前政府官员和民主党官员在内的一些人的调查进展缓慢,称他们不公平地针对他。此后不久,鲍威尔公开表示检察官的传票已送达美联储。

    另一个最近的例子是,司法部一名高级官员告诉CNN,检察官正在调查前白宫助手是否使用自动签名笔进行未经授权的行动。这一消息发布不到一天后,《纽约时报》称对拜登使用自动签名笔的调查可能结束。

    该官员表示,拜登本人并未受到调查,因为根据2024年最高法院扩大总统豁免权的裁决,总统在任期间的行为受到广泛保护。

    一名有明显政治动机的司法部官员埃德·马丁推动了最近针对政治对手的多项调查,包括自动签名笔使用调查。

    马丁明确表示,他认为即使主题人物未被指控犯罪,也应该公开谴责他们。

    “有一些真正的坏家伙,有些人确实对美国人民做了坏事。如果可以起诉,我们就起诉。但如果不能起诉,我们就公开点名。”马丁去年表示。“在一个重视耻辱的文化中,他们应该感到羞耻。”

    一些由马丁等官员支持的调查似乎已失败。例如,对科米新提出的伪证指控前景更加黯淡。

    前检察官亚伦·泽林斯基最近告诉CNN,他曾是特朗普的告密者,并在去年受到马丁的询问。“提出证据和进行审判很麻烦。宣布调查更容易……更容易利用司法部的公信力来抹黑人们。过程本身就是惩罚。”

    持续的未决调查也助长了辩护策略。

    知名辩护律师阿贝·洛厄尔(Abbe Lowell)表示:“效仿特朗普本人那种不良和不道德的风格,他领导的司法部已经成为一个愿意的政治武器,急于在任何证据收集之前或甚至在提起指控之前,就点名和羞辱总统的敌人和目标。” 洛厄尔曾为可能面临特朗普司法部政治指控的高调客户辩护。

    洛厄尔目前代表几名受到特朗普司法部调查、起诉或试图起诉的高调人士,包括纽约总检察长詹姆斯、美联储的库克、众议员杰森·克劳(曾是大陪审团拒绝起诉的国会议员之一)、记者唐·莱蒙以及特朗普第一任期的国家安全顾问约翰·博尔顿。

    洛厄尔也采取了更积极和公开的方式,为他认为可能面临调查的客户辩护。

    他还经常暗示可能要求驳回刑事指控,因为他声称司法部不公平地针对某些人提起指控。这类试图驳回案件的做法在法庭上极难胜诉,但近几个月在一些法官面前得到了更多支持。

    佛罗里达州南部美国检察官杰森·雷丁·基尼奥内斯自去年上任以来一直试图成为特朗普的忠实支持者,而起诉布伦南(前中央情报局局长)的努力正是他为建立自己在特朗普阵营中的地位而进行的更广泛努力的一部分。

    布伦南的律师在圣诞节前夕采取了不寻常的行动,致信迈阿密首席法官,指控大陪审团活动不公。律师们表示,他们认为基尼奥内斯试图通过佛罗里达州皮尔斯堡的大陪审团调查布伦南,而该大陪审团由特朗普任命的法官艾琳·坎农领导。坎农此前曾驳回针对特朗普的刑事案件。

    然而,据知情人士透露,如果布伦南被起诉,可能会在华盛顿特区进行。在那里,检察官将面临一个可能不太愿意起诉特朗普公开批评的前政府官员的大陪审团。

    检察官们关注的是共和党国会议员的指控,即布伦南在2017年和2023年关于情报界评估的证词中作了虚假陈述。

    布伦南作证称,中央情报局并未参与现已被证实不可靠的斯泰尔档案(指控特朗普竞选团队与克里姆林宫勾结赢得2016年选举),也未参与该档案在情报界评估中的包含。共和党议员声称,布伦南实际上知道该档案被纳入了报告。

    布伦南否认有任何不当行为。

    布伦南的律师在12月致佛罗里达州南区首席法官塞西莉亚·奥尔顿加的信中写道:“毫不奇怪,这种无情的总统压力——不顾法律和事实,追求政治目标——导致了前所未有的起诉行为不规范事件激增,尤其是在与总统感兴趣的政治问题相关的大陪审团调查和起诉决定方面。”

    CNN的宝拉·里德对本文有贡献。

    Justice Department’s brewing case against former CIA chief tests its efforts to prosecute Trump foes

    2026-03-10T14:35:57.295Z / CNN

    Justice Department prosecutors leading an investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan are facing increasing pressure from top Justice officials to bring criminal charges against him after the department has flailed in trying to punish President Donald Trump’s perceived enemies, people briefed on the matter told CNN in recent days.

    Prosecutors in the Miami US attorney’s office have been leading the Brennan probe, which relates to testimony the ex-intelligence chief gave to Congress in 2023 and the Russia investigation years earlier, issuing two rounds of subpoenas to several witnesses.

    Yet the push for charges has run into career prosecutors raising concerns in southern Florida, with some viewing the potential case as relatively weak.

    Ad Feedback

    Brennan’s lawyers have been bracing for a possible indictment for months now, which has not materialized.

    Justice officials and US Attorney Jason Reding Quiñones made a push in January to bring a case against him, according to two people briefed on the matter, but some career prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida resisted the pressure.

    Those career prosecutors are facing a new wave of pressure now, one of the sources said, and are struggling to delay bringing the case to a grand jury.

    At first, the prosecutors gathered documents late last year from Brennan and other former intelligence officials. The subpoenas specifically sought information about a 2017 intelligence report on Russian meddling in the election that Brennan worked on, and which he spoke about in his 2023 congressional testimony.

    A second round of subpoenas went in January to several former government officials and sought years of documents, including government records on the 2016 Russia investigation the people would no longer have access to, two people familiar with the investigation told CNN recently. At least one former intelligence community official has been interviewed in the probe, one source said.

    Though Brennan could still face grand jury activity, the investigation also could fall apart.

    His lawyers have said accusations of perjury, for instance, are without any merit.

    A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment for this story, saying it does not comment on ongoing investigations.

    Several of the probes launched into the actions of the president’s political foes have failed when presented to a grand jury over the last year. Other investigations have been opened but have yet to result in criminal charges — hanging for months over the heads of their targets.

    But even cases that never materialize can be disruptive to subjects’ lives, as people who believe they are being investigated by prosecutors and a grand jury are fearful of harm to their public reputations.

    Lawyers’ fees add up, though some people in Trump’s most politically charged criminal cases are receiving low- or no-cost legal help or financial backing from others, according to several sources in the legal industry in DC.

    While that’s true in any administration, the Trump Justice Department has more aggressively pursued Democratic political figures or individuals Trump and other top administration officials have said publicly they’d like to charge.

    Trump in November called Brennan, Former FBI Director Comey and several others part of “Obama’s Russia HOAX Treason Club”, in a social media post shortly after Comey was indicted.

    And FBI Director Kash Patel has co-opted a similar public message.

    “We’re going to continue to make people like Comey and Brennan and Clapper and Page and Strzok and so many others answer for what I believe are their acts of criminal conduct,” Patel said on a recent podcast, naming a group who are not facing any charges at this time, but yet whom Trump has publicly attacked repeatedly. (Former FBI agent Peter Strzok, lawyer Lisa Page and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper were key figures in the investigations into Trump’s 2016 campaign.)

    In a handful of districts with politically charged cases, well-respected career investigators and prosecutors have been fired en masse and replaced with more willing but less experienced line investigators.

    Closing lingering cases or probes that Trump wants to succeed has its own set of consequences for prosecutors or other Justice Department lawyers.

    Federal prosecutors in Virginia attempted to bring criminal charges twice against Comey and three times against New York Attorney General Letitia James, and those charges have either been tossed by judges or rejected by grand juries.

    A grand jury refusing an indictment is historically a highly unusual outcome — though it’s happening more frequently in politically charged cases Trump wants to pursue.

    A grand jury in Washington, DC, recently denied the Justice Department’s attempt to criminally charge Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly and five other members of Congress because of a video they taped reminding military and intelligence officers they are allowed to refuse orders they believe go against the law.

    “It was a grand jury of anonymous American citizens who upheld the rule of law and determined this case should not proceed,” said Rep. Elissa Slotkin, another member whom the Justice Department tried and failed to charge. “Whether or not (US Attorney Jeanine) Pirro succeeded is not the point. It’s that President Trump continues to weaponize our justice system against his perceived enemies.”

    Several other Trump political foes have been the subject of investigative inquiries that haven’t materialized into charges.

    In recent weeks, federal law enforcement has been revisiting the work of former prosecutors whose work ultimately became part of the cases against Trump under special counsel Jack Smith, according to several people and a critical public statement from Patel.

    CNN has previously confirmed investigative activity by the Justice Department around the financial papers of Rep. Adam Schiff and Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook, and into Senate testimony by Federal Reserve by Chair Jerome Powell.

    And Republicans on Capitol Hill have added to who the Justice Department may consider investigating next, by referring a former special counsel’s office prosecutor of Trump and a former star witness after January 6 for possible criminal charges.

    None of those people have been charged.

    “This unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration’s threats and ongoing pressure,” Powell said in a video statement after receiving a criminal subpoena, pointing out Trump’s unhappiness with the Fed-controlled loan interest rates.

    “This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings,” he added. “Those are pretexts.”

    Naming and shaming


    The Fed chair’s public messaging in response to an open criminal investigation has become part of the playbook in Washington to publicize a grand jury inquisition.

    In past administrations, Justice Department and administration officials have been less willing to comment on uncharged matters or people who could be subject to an investigation. Cases could linger quietly for years.

    That is not the case now. Trump himself has posted names on social media repeatedly of people he’d like to see his Justice Department indict, and the attorney general and other senior leaders of the Justice Department have repeatedly commented on ongoing investigations.

    In January, Trump hosted US attorneys at the White House, where he complained about the slow pace of investigations into a number of people, including officials from previous administrations as well as Democratic officials who he said unfairly targeted him, CNN has previously reported. Shortly after, Powell made public that prosecutors’ subpoenas went to the Federal Reserve.

    In another recent example, a senior Justice Department official told CNN that prosecutors are probing whether former aides in the White House may have used an autopen for actions not authorized by then-President Joe Biden. The message came less than a day after the New York Times said an investigation into Biden’s use of autopen was likely over.

    Biden is not under investigation himself, the official said, as presidents have broad protections for the actions they take while in office following a Supreme Court decision in 2024 broadening presidential immunity.

    One particularly politically motivated Justice official, Ed Martin, has pushed for several of the recent investigations against political foes, including one over autopen use.

    Martin has specified he believes subjects should be named and shamed, even if they are never charged with a crime.

    “There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people. And if they can be charged, we’ll charge them. But if they can’t be charged, we will name them,” Martin said last year. “And in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are shamed.”

    Some of those investigations that officials like Martin once championed have appeared to fall apart. A renewed perjury charge against Comey, for instance, faces an even more difficult future.

    “Putting on evidence and a trial is messy. It’s just easier to announce an investigation … It’s easier to use the integrity of the department to slime people,” Aaron Zelinsky, a former prosecutor who has been a past whistleblower about Trump and received an inquiry from Martin last year, recently told CNN. “The process is the punishment.”

    The lingering open investigations are also fueling defense strategies.

    “Taking a page from Trump’s own unsavory and unethical style, his DOJ has become a willing political weapon eager to name and shame the president’s foes and targets before any evidence is gathered, or even charges filed,” Abbe Lowell, a prominent defense lawyer who has collected high-profile clients who could face politically charged cases under Trump.

    Lowell currently represents several high-profile people this Trump Justice Department has investigated, charged or attempted to charge. They include: James in New York; the Federal Reserve’s Cook; Rep. Jason Crow, who was among the members of Congress a grand jury declined to charge; journalist Don Lemon; and John Bolton, the national security adviser in Trump’s first term in office.

    Lowell, too, has taken a more aggressive and public approach defending clients he has who believe they may be investigated.

    He’s also regularly teased the possibility of asking for criminal charges to be dismissed because he alleges the Justice Department has unfairly singled out people to charge. Those types of attempts to have a case dismissed are exceedingly difficult to win in court, but have gotten more traction in front of some judges in recent months.

    The push to charge Brennan, the former CIA director, for his official work in 2016, is part of a broader effort by Quiñones, the US attorney in the Southern District of Florida who has sought to establish himself as a Trump loyalist since taking office last year.

    Brennan’s attorneys just before Christmas made the unusual move of writing to the chief judge in Miami with their accusations of unfair grand jury activity. The lawyers said they believed Quiñones was attempting to investigate Brennan through a Fort Pierce, Florida-based grand jury, under the direction of Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon. Cannon in Ft. Pierce previously dismissed the criminal case against Trump.

    Yet if Brennan were to be charged, it may be in Washington, DC, according to people briefed on the matter. There, prosecutors would face a grand jury that may be much less willing to indict a former administration official that Trump publicly criticizes.

    Prosecutors have focused on allegations from congressional Republicans that Brennan made false statements in testimony to Congress in 2017 and 2023 about the Intelligence Community Assessment.

    Brennan testified that the CIA was not involved with the now-discredited Steele dossier — which alleged that the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin to win the 2016 election — and its inclusion in the Intelligence Community Assessment. Republican lawmakers have claimed that Brennan was in fact aware of the dossier’s inclusion in the report.

    Brennan has denied any wrongdoing.

    “Not surprisingly, this unrelenting presidential pressure to pursue political targets without regard to the law or facts has resulted in an unprecedented spike in the incidence of irregular prosecutorial conduct, especially in relation to grand jury investigations and charging decisions relating to matters of political interest to the President,” Brennan’s attorneys wrote in the December letter to Southern District of Florida Chief Judge Cecilia Altonaga.

    CNN’s Paula Reid contributed to this report.

  • 司法部的埃德·马丁因向乔治城大学发送威胁信件面临纪律部门的道德指控


    更新于:2026年3月10日 / 美国东部时间上午11:10 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    周二公布的法庭文件显示,华盛顿特区负责监督律师不当行为的机构已对司法部特赦律师埃德·马丁提起道德指控。此前,马丁在担任临时美国检察官期间,于去年向乔治城大学法学院发送了一封威胁信件,质疑该校的多元化和包容性政策。

    在2月17日给法学院的信中,马丁告诉校方官员,一名举报人声称乔治城大学在教授多元化与包容性(DEI)相关内容,并询问了这一做法。在未等待回应的情况下,他告知学校,他正通过指示其办公室工作人员不雇佣该校任何学生担任研究员、实习生或美国检察官办公室(华盛顿特区)雇员的方式实施制裁。

    对此,该校时任院长威廉·特雷诺(William Treanor)告诉马丁——后者是一名虔诚的天主教徒——他的信件“构成了对该校作为耶稣会和天主教机构使命的攻击”。

    在周五提交给华盛顿特区上诉法院专业责任委员会并于周二公开的文件中,华盛顿特区律师协会纪律顾问汉密尔顿·“菲尔”·福克斯三世(Hamilton “Phil” Fox III)指控马丁作为政府官员,通过要求法学院改变其教学内容和教学方式,违反了美国宪法第一修正案和第五修正案。

    法庭文件称:“他以官方身份行事并代表政府,使用胁迫手段惩罚或压制一种不受欢迎的观点——即多元化与包容性(DEI)的教学和推广。他要求乔治城法学院放弃其言论自由和宗教权利,以换取就业机会。”

    司法部在一份声明中指责华盛顿特区律师协会是一个有党派倾向的组织。

    声明称:“华盛顿特区律师协会试图针对和惩罚那些为特朗普总统服务的人,却拒绝调查或处理拜登和奥巴马政府时期的律师所犯下的实际道德违规行为,这清楚地表明了这个有党派倾向的组织的议程。”

    马丁未立即回应置评请求,其律师也无法立即取得联系。

    马丁在联邦检察官办公室的短暂任期充满争议,很大程度上是因为他此前曾支持2021年1月6日冲击国会大厦的暴徒。

    他在特朗普总统上任后开始担任该职位,并向所有参与袭击的人发布了全面赦免令。他还主持了多次解雇和解职行动,多次违反司法部规范,向国会议员和其他机构(包括乔治城大学)发送威胁信件。

    在明确无法在共和党控制的参议院获得足够确认票数后,马丁被让娜·皮罗(Jeanine Pirro)取代为联邦检察官,并在司法部获得其他职位,包括特赦律师和总检察长帕姆·邦迪(Pam Bondi)武器化工作组主任。

    在离开美国检察官办公室之际,他向全体员工宣布自己正受到华盛顿特区纪律顾问办公室的调查,但未详细说明调查细节。

    针对马丁的投诉暗示了他在此事件中采取的行动。文件指出,当纪律顾问办公室最初在去年4月收到针对他的投诉并要求正式回应时,马丁拒绝回应,反而向首席法官和华盛顿特区上诉法院的资深法官发送了一份单方面信函。

    投诉称:“在那封信中,他表示不会回应纪律顾问的询问,抱怨纪律顾问的‘行为不公’,并请求‘与你们所有人进行面对面会议,讨论此事并找到前进的道路’。”文件还补充说,马丁还抄送了白宫法律顾问办公室。

    尽管首席法官告知马丁,单方面与他会面(即未告知对方)是不合适的,他必须通过常规法律程序与华盛顿特区纪律顾问办公室沟通,但投诉称他仍多次联系法官抱怨调查。

    在一封信中,他写道,法官不仅应该“立即暂停福克斯先生以调查其行为”,还应该“因他的偏见行为驳回对我的指控”。

    由于他与法官的沟通以及要求驳回案件,马丁现在还面临在诉讼期间与法官进行单方面沟通的指控,以及从事严重妨碍司法公正的行为。

    哥伦比亚广播公司新闻今年早些时候曾报道,马丁此后已被剥夺主持司法部武器化工作组的头衔,但他仍以特赦律师身份留在司法部。

    他此前还曾担任美国检察官特别助理,负责调查针对公职人员的抵押贷款欺诈指控。

    其中一个目标是纽约州总检察长莱蒂蒂亚·詹姆斯(Letitia James),后者后来被司法部起诉,但在联邦法官裁定弗吉尼亚州东区的临时美国检察官非法任命导致起诉无效后,该案件被驳回。

    詹姆斯的律师阿贝·洛厄尔(Abbe Lowell)在社交媒体上分享了马丁在调查期间站在她一处房产外的照片后,公开指控马丁在此案中存在不当行为。

    DOJ’s Ed Martin faces ethics charges from disciplinary office over threatening letter to Georgetown University

    Updated on: March 10, 2026 / 11:10 AM EDT / CBS News

    The office that polices attorney misconduct in Washington, D.C., has filed ethics charges against Justice Department pardon attorney Ed Martin, after Martin last year sent a threatening letter to the Georgetown University Law Center that raised questions about its diversity and inclusion policies while he was serving as interim U.S. attorney, according to court filings made public Tuesday.

    In a Feb. 17 letter to the law school, Martin told university officials that a whistleblower claimed Georgetown was teaching DEI and asked about the practice. Without waiting for a response, he told the school he was imposing sanctions by instructing his office staff not to employ any students from the school as fellows, interns or employees at the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, D.C.

    In response, the school’s now-former dean, William Treanor, told Martin, who is a devout Catholic, that his letter represented “an attack on the University’s mission as a Jesuit and Catholic institution.”

    In filings made in the D.C. Court of Appeals’ Board on Professional Responsibility dated Friday and made public on Tuesday, Disciplinary Counsel Hamilton “Phil” Fox III of the D.C. Bar alleged that Martin’s conduct as a government official violated the First and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution by making demands that the law school change what it teaches students and how it teaches them.

    “Acting in his official capacity and speaking on behalf of the government, he used coercion to punish or suppress a disfavored viewpoint, the teaching and promotion of DEI,” the court filing says. “He demanded that Georgetown Law relinquish its free speech and religious rights in order to obtain a benefit, employment opportunities for its students.”

    In a statement, the Justice Department accused the D.C. Bar of being a partisan organization.

    “The DC bar’s attempt to target and punish those serving President Trump while refusing to investigate or act against actual ethical violations that were committed by Biden and Obama administration attorneys is a clear indication of this partisan organization’s agenda,” the statement said.

    Ed Martin speaks at an event hosted by then-Rep. Matt Gaetz at the Capitol in Washington, June 13, 2023. AP Photo/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades

    Martin did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and an attorney for Martin could not be immediately reached.

    Martin’s brief tenure at the U.S. attorney’s office was riddled with controversy, in large part over his prior involvement with advocating for the rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

    He started the role as President Trump took office and issued sweeping pardons to all of those who participated in the attack. He also presided over firings, demotions and violated Justice Department norms repeatedly by sending threatening letters to members of Congress and other institutions, including Georgetown.

    After it became clear he could not win enough votes for confirmation in the Republican-controlled Senate, Martin was replaced as U.S. attorney by Jeanine Pirro and given other jobs at the department, including pardon attorney and chief of Attorney General Pam Bondi’s Weaponization Working Group.

    On his way out the door from the U.S. attorney’s office, he announced to his entire staff that he was under investigation by the D.C. Office of Disciplinary Counsel without elaborating on the details.

    The complaint against Martin alludes to actions he took in connection with that incident. It noted that when the Office of Disciplinary Counsel initially received a complaint against him last April and asked for a formal response, Martin refused to engage and instead sent an ex-parte letter to the chief judge and the senior judges of the D.C. Court of Appeals.

    “In that letter, he stated that he would not be responding to Disciplinary Counsel’s inquiry, complained about Disciplinary Counsel’s ‘uneven behavior,’ and requested a ‘face-to-face meeting with all of you to discuss this matter and find a way forward,’” the complaint said, adding that Martin had also copied the White House counsel’s office.

    Although the chief judge told Martin it was improper to meet with him ex parte — that is, without the knowledge of the other party — and that he had to communicate with the D.C. Office of Disciplinary Counsel through the usual legal process, he repeatedly contacted the judge to complain about the investigation, the complaint alleges.

    In one letter, he wrote that the judge should “not only suspend Mr. Fox immediately to investigate his conduct” but should also move to “dismiss the case against me because of his prejudicial conduct.”

    Because of his communications with the judge and requests to dismiss the case, Martin is now also facing charges of improperly communicating ex parte with a judge during a proceeding, and engaging in conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice.

    CBS News previously reported earlier this year that Martin has since been stripped of his title presiding over the Justice Department’s Weaponization Working Group, but he remains on staff at department as its pardon attorney.

    He also previously served as a special assistant U.S. attorney tasked with helping investigate allegations of mortgage fraud against public officials.

    One of the targets, New York Attorney General Letitia James, was later charged by the Justice Department in a case that was dismissed after a federal judge determined the interim U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia who secured the indictment had been unlawfully appointed.

    James’ attorney, Abbe Lowell, has publicly accused Martin of misconduct in that case, after he was photographed standing outside one of her properties during the investigation and shared the images on social media.

  • 伊朗媒体:当局逮捕30名为美以工作的间谍 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年3月10日 23:33

    伊朗情报部门宣称,过去几天已查明并逮捕了30名为美国和以色列效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。图为一名妇女经过位于首都德黑兰前美国大使馆的地区。 (法新社)

    伊朗情报部门宣称,过去几天已查明并逮捕了30名为美国和以色列效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。

    路透社引述伊朗官媒报道,伊朗情报部星期二(3月10日)宣称在伊朗东北部逮捕了一名外国公民,指对方为美国和以色列从事间谍活动,并充当两个波斯湾国家的代理人。

    伊朗当局也说,过去几天中已逮捕了30名为以色列和美国效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。

    延伸阅读


    特朗普称有可能有条件同伊朗谈判

    以军对德黑兰目标发动新一轮打击

    伊朗媒体:当局逮捕30名为美以工作的间谍 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年3月10日 23:33

    伊朗情报部门宣称,过去几天已查明并逮捕了30名为美国和以色列效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。图为一名妇女经过位于首都德黑兰前美国大使馆的地区。 (法新社)

    伊朗情报部门宣称,过去几天已查明并逮捕了30名为美国和以色列效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。

    路透社引述伊朗官媒报道,伊朗情报部星期二(3月10日)宣称在伊朗东北部逮捕了一名外国公民,指对方为美国和以色列从事间谍活动,并充当两个波斯湾国家的代理人。

    伊朗当局也说,过去几天中已逮捕了30名为以色列和美国效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。

    延伸阅读


    特朗普称有可能有条件同伊朗谈判

    以军对德黑兰目标发动新一轮打击

  • 伊朗媒体:当局逮捕30名为美以工作的间谍


    2026年3月10日 23:33 / 联合早报

    伊朗情报部门宣称,过去几天已查明并逮捕了30名为美国和以色列效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。图为一名妇女经过位于首都德黑兰前美国大使馆的地区。 (法新社)

    伊朗情报部门宣称,过去几天已查明并逮捕了30名为美国和以色列效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。

    路透社引述伊朗官媒报道,伊朗情报部星期二(3月10日)宣称在伊朗东北部逮捕了一名外国公民,指对方为美国和以色列从事间谍活动,并充当两个波斯湾国家的代理人。

    伊朗当局也说,过去几天中已逮捕了30名为以色列和美国效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。

    伊朗媒体:当局逮捕30名为美以工作的间谍

    2026年3月10日 23:33 / 联合早报

    伊朗情报部门宣称,过去几天已查明并逮捕了30名为美国和以色列效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。图为一名妇女经过位于首都德黑兰前美国大使馆的地区。 (法新社)

    伊朗情报部门宣称,过去几天已查明并逮捕了30名为美国和以色列效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。

    路透社引述伊朗官媒报道,伊朗情报部星期二(3月10日)宣称在伊朗东北部逮捕了一名外国公民,指对方为美国和以色列从事间谍活动,并充当两个波斯湾国家的代理人。

    伊朗当局也说,过去几天中已逮捕了30名为以色列和美国效力的间谍、国内雇佣兵及行动特工。

  • 定位追踪器助防走失 社区伙伴提供500装置支援看护者


    发布/2026年3月10日 19:35 / 联合早报

    PY Legal LLC董事余美娟律师(左一)手上的就是小小的定位追踪器。她发动Actxa首席执行官苏明利(左二起)、关护之心执行总裁陈来顺、Activate Interactive首席执行官陈向晖几个社区伙伴,发起“REACT CareTag”计划,为特需或失智人士的看护者或家庭送出定位追踪器,协助他们在看护对象走失时更快掌握位置。 (受访者提供)

    2025年8月29日,11岁的特需男童哈利尔(Muhammad Hairil Bin Muhammad Effendi)中午前擅自离家后走失,警方发文告呼吁公众寻人。男童隔天晚上在东海岸公园外海寻获,却已溺毙身亡。

    PY Legal LLC董事余美娟律师说,这起悲剧让她深受触动。“我为失去孩子的家庭感到非常难过。开始思考,能怎么应用科技,避免类似事情发生。”

    余美娟那时也联想到,像患有自闭症或精神疾病患者一旦走失,往往需要动员大量人力搜寻;她很希望能借助科技,协助看护者追踪看护对象的踪迹。

    她在2025年11月联系上本地科技公司Activate Interactive讨论合作,这家公司后来同意参与并提供设备及技术支援。“不光只发出追踪器,还得确保家庭懂得使用,这样的支援才算完整。”

    她于是再联系了预防健康品牌Actxa与社区看护组织关护之心(CaringSG),合力送出500个定位追踪器,协助有特殊需要或失智者的家庭和看护者,在家人走失或失去联系时及时掌握位置,让看护者能更快采取行动。

    这项名为“REACT CareTag”的社区计划,从3月9日至2026年12月开放申请,申请者须由注册慈善机构、社区中心、医疗人员、注册社工或国会议员转介。

    看护者可将转介信电邮至csr@activate.sg申请,预约领取追踪器。领取地点是Activate Interactive位于新邮政中心的办公室,工作人员会现场示范如何将追踪器与手机连接,让看护者即时通过手机查看亲人的位置。

    计划目前送出的追踪器是500个。余美娟说,若反应热烈,不排除争取更多企业支持,未来发放更多追踪器。

    但她也指出,定位设备毕竟涉及隐私问题,所以也得在安全与隐私间求取平衡;因此设备设计不会太显眼,以维护佩戴者的尊严。

    关护之心执行总裁陈来顺(52岁)说,特需者走失,是看护者和家人的最大隐忧。“当特需者在一个陌生的地方走失,又说不出话或表达能力有限,看护者在这个时候如果能凭着定位器迅速作出反应,对特需者来说应该是最大的安慰。”

    39岁的黄姓父亲有个7岁的儿子,确诊自闭症,也可能患有注意力缺陷多动症(ADHD)。儿子即将到特需学校上学,他正考虑为孩子使用定位追踪器。他说:“如果知道孩子人在学校或在可预知的范围内,看护者会比较放心。”

    定位追踪设备可通过科技辅助基金获补助

    目前,定位追踪设备也可通过科技辅助基金(Assistive Technology Fund,简称ATF)获得补助。基金由新加坡协助残障者自立局(SG Enable)管理,为符合条件的残障人士提供辅助器材资助。

    阿裕尼集选区议员张文杰去年9月在国会询问,科技辅助基金的申请程序是否适用于AirTag等价格较低的电子辅助设备。社会及家庭发展部长马善高书面答复时指出,当时未接获有关定位设备的资助申请。

    社会及家庭发展部回应《联合早报》询问时说,ATF支持多种辅助科技设备,包括定位追踪器,申请须由医疗专业人员评估需要,并由医院或社会服务机构协助提出。

    当局指出,自2014年以来,ATF受惠人数逐年增加,至今已增至逾五倍。今年1月,基金也放宽申请条件,家庭人均收入介于2601元至4800元也可申请,让更多家庭受惠。

    定位追踪器助防走失 社区伙伴提供500装置支援看护者

    发布/2026年3月10日 19:35 / 联合早报

    PY Legal LLC董事余美娟律师(左一)手上的就是小小的定位追踪器。她发动Actxa首席执行官苏明利(左二起)、关护之心执行总裁陈来顺、Activate Interactive首席执行官陈向晖几个社区伙伴,发起“REACT CareTag”计划,为特需或失智人士的看护者或家庭送出定位追踪器,协助他们在看护对象走失时更快掌握位置。 (受访者提供)

    2025年8月29日,11岁的特需男童哈利尔(Muhammad Hairil Bin Muhammad Effendi)中午前擅自离家后走失,警方发文告呼吁公众寻人。男童隔天晚上在东海岸公园外海寻获,却已溺毙身亡。

    PY Legal LLC董事余美娟律师说,这起悲剧让她深受触动。“我为失去孩子的家庭感到非常难过。开始思考,能怎么应用科技,避免类似事情发生。”

    余美娟那时也联想到,像患有自闭症或精神疾病患者一旦走失,往往需要动员大量人力搜寻;她很希望能借助科技,协助看护者追踪看护对象的踪迹。

    她在2025年11月联系上本地科技公司Activate Interactive讨论合作,这家公司后来同意参与并提供设备及技术支援。“不光只发出追踪器,还得确保家庭懂得使用,这样的支援才算完整。”

    她于是再联系了预防健康品牌Actxa与社区看护组织关护之心(CaringSG),合力送出500个定位追踪器,协助有特殊需要或失智者的家庭和看护者,在家人走失或失去联系时及时掌握位置,让看护者能更快采取行动。

    这项名为“REACT CareTag”的社区计划,从3月9日至2026年12月开放申请,申请者须由注册慈善机构、社区中心、医疗人员、注册社工或国会议员转介。

    看护者可将转介信电邮至csr@activate.sg申请,预约领取追踪器。领取地点是Activate Interactive位于新邮政中心的办公室,工作人员会现场示范如何将追踪器与手机连接,让看护者即时通过手机查看亲人的位置。

    计划目前送出的追踪器是500个。余美娟说,若反应热烈,不排除争取更多企业支持,未来发放更多追踪器。

    但她也指出,定位设备毕竟涉及隐私问题,所以也得在安全与隐私间求取平衡;因此设备设计不会太显眼,以维护佩戴者的尊严。

    关护之心执行总裁陈来顺(52岁)说,特需者走失,是看护者和家人的最大隐忧。“当特需者在一个陌生的地方走失,又说不出话或表达能力有限,看护者在这个时候如果能凭着定位器迅速作出反应,对特需者来说应该是最大的安慰。”

    39岁的黄姓父亲有个7岁的儿子,确诊自闭症,也可能患有注意力缺陷多动症(ADHD)。儿子即将到特需学校上学,他正考虑为孩子使用定位追踪器。他说:“如果知道孩子人在学校或在可预知的范围内,看护者会比较放心。”

    定位追踪设备可通过科技辅助基金获补助

    目前,定位追踪设备也可通过科技辅助基金(Assistive Technology Fund,简称ATF)获得补助。基金由新加坡协助残障者自立局(SG Enable)管理,为符合条件的残障人士提供辅助器材资助。

    阿裕尼集选区议员张文杰去年9月在国会询问,科技辅助基金的申请程序是否适用于AirTag等价格较低的电子辅助设备。社会及家庭发展部长马善高书面答复时指出,当时未接获有关定位设备的资助申请。

    社会及家庭发展部回应《联合早报》询问时说,ATF支持多种辅助科技设备,包括定位追踪器,申请须由医疗专业人员评估需要,并由医院或社会服务机构协助提出。

    当局指出,自2014年以来,ATF受惠人数逐年增加,至今已增至逾五倍。今年1月,基金也放宽申请条件,家庭人均收入介于2601元至4800元也可申请,让更多家庭受惠。

  • 欧洲理事会主席:俄罗斯是中东战争中唯一赢家


    2026年3月10日 19:15 / 联合早报

    欧洲理事会主席科斯塔星期二说,随着能源价格飙升、外界对俄乌战争的关注度下降,俄罗斯是中东战争中唯一的赢家。 (路透社)

    欧洲理事会主席科斯塔说,随着能源价格飙升、外界对俄乌战争的关注度下降,俄罗斯迄今是中东战争中唯一的赢家。

    路透社报道,欧洲理事会主席科斯塔星期二(3月10日)在布鲁塞尔向欧盟各国大使发表讲话时称:“迄今为止,这场战争只有一个赢家——俄罗斯。”

    能源价格上涨为俄罗斯提供了新的资金来源,以支持对乌克兰的战争。同时,中东冲突吸引了全球关注,使俄乌战事的关注度下降,俄罗斯也因此受益。

    科斯塔强调,欧盟必须捍卫基于国际规则的秩序,“自由与人权无法通过炮火实现,唯有国际法才能保障这些权利”。

    他警告,这个秩序正面对来自美国的挑战,并呼吁中东各方重返谈判桌。“必须避免局势进一步升级。这条道路将威胁中东、欧洲乃至更广阔地区。”

    欧洲理事会主席:俄罗斯是中东战争中唯一赢家

    2026年3月10日 19:15 / 联合早报

    欧洲理事会主席科斯塔星期二说,随着能源价格飙升、外界对俄乌战争的关注度下降,俄罗斯是中东战争中唯一的赢家。 (路透社)

    欧洲理事会主席科斯塔说,随着能源价格飙升、外界对俄乌战争的关注度下降,俄罗斯迄今是中东战争中唯一的赢家。

    路透社报道,欧洲理事会主席科斯塔星期二(3月10日)在布鲁塞尔向欧盟各国大使发表讲话时称:“迄今为止,这场战争只有一个赢家——俄罗斯。”

    能源价格上涨为俄罗斯提供了新的资金来源,以支持对乌克兰的战争。同时,中东冲突吸引了全球关注,使俄乌战事的关注度下降,俄罗斯也因此受益。

    科斯塔强调,欧盟必须捍卫基于国际规则的秩序,“自由与人权无法通过炮火实现,唯有国际法才能保障这些权利”。

    他警告,这个秩序正面对来自美国的挑战,并呼吁中东各方重返谈判桌。“必须避免局势进一步升级。这条道路将威胁中东、欧洲乃至更广阔地区。”

  • 印度收紧燃气管制 餐饮业者警告或引发停业潮 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年3月10日 19:25

    中东战争扰乱进口供应,印度星期二下令收紧液体天然气和液化石油气管控,餐饮业界警告或引发大范围停业。

    法新社报道,印度作为全球人口最多的国家,是全球第四大液化天然气(LNG)进口国,也是第二大液化石油气(LPG)进口国,后者广泛用于家庭和商业烹饪,其中相当大一部分来自中东地区。

    印度石油部在星期二(3月10日)发布的命令中称:“中东地区持续的冲突,已导致通过霍尔木兹海峡的液化天然气运输受阻。”

    文件称,新规将“确保对优先领域获得公平分配和持续供应”。

    根据命令,LNG供应将优先保障居民家庭、交通运输行业以及液化石油气生产的需求。

    其他行业,包括化肥厂和茶产业,将获得70%至80%的用气量,具体供应“视运行情况而定”。为弥补缺口,石化设施和发电厂的供气将被全部或部分削减。

    与此同时,印度政府星期一(9日)发布另一项优先保障居民家庭液化石油气供应的命令后,印度各地餐馆和酒店也警告运营将受影响。

    印度全国餐饮业协会警告,政府指令已导致全国LPG供应商停止向餐饮企业供气。

    协会在声明中说,餐饮业在运营上高度依赖商用液化石油气,任何供应中断都将导致多数餐厅被迫暂停营业。

    印度班加罗尔市一酒店业协会负责人拉奥说,目前“形势十分严峻”。

    “燃气供应已经受到影响,许多小型餐饮和酒店机构只剩一到两天的库存,大型企业可能还有约10天的储备。接下来,大家可能将根据实际情况调整或缩减菜单。”

    印度收紧燃气管制 餐饮业者警告或引发停业潮 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年3月10日 19:25

    中东战争扰乱进口供应,印度星期二下令收紧液体天然气和液化石油气管控,餐饮业界警告或引发大范围停业。

    法新社报道,印度作为全球人口最多的国家,是全球第四大液化天然气(LNG)进口国,也是第二大液化石油气(LPG)进口国,后者广泛用于家庭和商业烹饪,其中相当大一部分来自中东地区。

    印度石油部在星期二(3月10日)发布的命令中称:“中东地区持续的冲突,已导致通过霍尔木兹海峡的液化天然气运输受阻。”

    文件称,新规将“确保对优先领域获得公平分配和持续供应”。

    根据命令,LNG供应将优先保障居民家庭、交通运输行业以及液化石油气生产的需求。

    其他行业,包括化肥厂和茶产业,将获得70%至80%的用气量,具体供应“视运行情况而定”。为弥补缺口,石化设施和发电厂的供气将被全部或部分削减。

    与此同时,印度政府星期一(9日)发布另一项优先保障居民家庭液化石油气供应的命令后,印度各地餐馆和酒店也警告运营将受影响。

    印度全国餐饮业协会警告,政府指令已导致全国LPG供应商停止向餐饮企业供气。

    协会在声明中说,餐饮业在运营上高度依赖商用液化石油气,任何供应中断都将导致多数餐厅被迫暂停营业。

    印度班加罗尔市一酒店业协会负责人拉奥说,目前“形势十分严峻”。

    “燃气供应已经受到影响,许多小型餐饮和酒店机构只剩一到两天的库存,大型企业可能还有约10天的储备。接下来,大家可能将根据实际情况调整或缩减菜单。”

  • 智能制造平台“先测试”解决方案 助企业减低采用新技术风险


    发布时间:2026-03-10 19:40 | 来源:联合早报

    本地企业未来在把自动化或机器人技术引入制造流程前,可先在一个“试验厂”进行测试。

    义安理工学院与先进制造企业西门子合作推出智能制造平台,让企业模拟真实生产环境,测试自动化和机器人解决方案,降低采用新技术的风险。

    设在义安理工学院的新智能平台,整合数码技术、自动化与数据分析等功能,有助缩短新解决方案的测试周期,使企业更迅速、更有信心地推进工业4.0转型。

    西门子也是技能创前程行业领头羊计划下,唯一来自先进制造领域的企业。

    义安理工学院与新科研 推本地首个可叠加智能制造专科文凭

    鉴于智能制造领域对高技能人才的需求日益迫切,义安理工学院也携手新加坡科技研究局,星期二(3月10日)在2026年世界工程日活动上,推出本地首个可叠加的智能制造专科文凭。

    这项文凭课程于今年10月开课,首批招收20名成人学员。课程专为工程师、制造业专业人士及应届毕业生设计,重点培养他们在人工智能、自动化等下一代制造领域的应用能力。

    文凭采用模块化叠加结构,学员可逐步累积毕业专业证书(Post-Diploma Certificate),最终取得完整的文凭。义安理工学院将率先提供“智能制造自动化与分析”和“工业网络安全与韧性”两项证书课程,新科研则提供制造业人工智能相关的证书课程。两所机构的课程相互承认。

    英兰妮:要吸引年轻一代入工程行业 须让人了解意义和使命

    总理公署部长兼财政部及国家发展部第二部长英兰妮,星期二在世界工程日活动上致辞时说,未来10年至15年,本地会有多个大型发展项目,包括樟宜机场第五搭客大厦(T5)、巴耶利峇空军基地重新发展计划等,需要大量工程相关人才。

    英兰妮说,千禧一代和Z世代在选择职业时,除了关注起薪和薪酬配套,也更加重视工作的意义与个人成就感。因此,工程行业须让年轻一代理解工程师的价值,如工作的意义与使命,才更有机会吸引年轻人入行。

    政府统一入伙证与完工证处理时限 最长不超过21工作日

    另一方面,为进一步改善建筑环境业,政府不时检讨现有条例和流程,以营造更亲商环境。

    英兰妮说,政府已把不同机构对临时入伙证(Temporary Occupation Permit)和法定完工证书(Certificate of Statutory Completion)的相关处理时限统一,让发展商更容易规划工程预算和进度。

    过去,各机构的回应时间不同,发展商等待取得入伙证的时间可能较长。根据建设局发出的通告,在统一服务标准后,各机构从处理验收申请到给予答复,最长不超过21个工作日。

    新做法可缩短最多三天的等候时间,每年预计约900个相关文件申请可受惠。

    新标准提升建筑物的室内空气质量和能源效率

    新加坡标准理事会也公布三项全国标准和技术参考,以进一步改善建筑的室内空气质量和能源效率。

    根据新标准,舒适的冷气温度范围,应为摄氏24度至25.5度,比现有的标准提高0.5至1度。若冷气温度超过25.5度,也可通过增加空气流动如使用吊扇,以维持舒适度并降低能耗。

    国家环境局发言人受询时指出,更新后的标准,进一步提升本地应对空气传播疾病及环境健康风险的能力,同时兼顾能源效率与气候韧性。

    环境局和新加坡工程师学会鼓励建筑发展商和承包商,采用先进的通风策略和空气质量监测系统,以打造更健康、更可持续的建筑。新建项目应在规划和设计阶段纳入新标准,而现有建筑在进行重大翻新或系统升级时,也可分阶段实施。

    由工程师学会举办的2026年世界工程日活动,吸引超过1000人线上线下参与,现场也公布学会成立60周年的纪念标志。

    智能制造平台“先测试”解决方案 助企业减低采用新技术风险

    发布时间:2026-03-10 19:40 | 来源:联合早报

    本地企业未来在把自动化或机器人技术引入制造流程前,可先在一个“试验厂”进行测试。

    义安理工学院与先进制造企业西门子合作推出智能制造平台,让企业模拟真实生产环境,测试自动化和机器人解决方案,降低采用新技术的风险。

    设在义安理工学院的新智能平台,整合数码技术、自动化与数据分析等功能,有助缩短新解决方案的测试周期,使企业更迅速、更有信心地推进工业4.0转型。

    西门子也是技能创前程行业领头羊计划下,唯一来自先进制造领域的企业。

    义安理工学院与新科研 推本地首个可叠加智能制造专科文凭

    鉴于智能制造领域对高技能人才的需求日益迫切,义安理工学院也携手新加坡科技研究局,星期二(3月10日)在2026年世界工程日活动上,推出本地首个可叠加的智能制造专科文凭。

    这项文凭课程于今年10月开课,首批招收20名成人学员。课程专为工程师、制造业专业人士及应届毕业生设计,重点培养他们在人工智能、自动化等下一代制造领域的应用能力。

    文凭采用模块化叠加结构,学员可逐步累积毕业专业证书(Post-Diploma Certificate),最终取得完整的文凭。义安理工学院将率先提供“智能制造自动化与分析”和“工业网络安全与韧性”两项证书课程,新科研则提供制造业人工智能相关的证书课程。两所机构的课程相互承认。

    英兰妮:要吸引年轻一代入工程行业 须让人了解意义和使命

    总理公署部长兼财政部及国家发展部第二部长英兰妮,星期二在世界工程日活动上致辞时说,未来10年至15年,本地会有多个大型发展项目,包括樟宜机场第五搭客大厦(T5)、巴耶利峇空军基地重新发展计划等,需要大量工程相关人才。

    英兰妮说,千禧一代和Z世代在选择职业时,除了关注起薪和薪酬配套,也更加重视工作的意义与个人成就感。因此,工程行业须让年轻一代理解工程师的价值,如工作的意义与使命,才更有机会吸引年轻人入行。

    政府统一入伙证与完工证处理时限 最长不超过21工作日

    另一方面,为进一步改善建筑环境业,政府不时检讨现有条例和流程,以营造更亲商环境。

    英兰妮说,政府已把不同机构对临时入伙证(Temporary Occupation Permit)和法定完工证书(Certificate of Statutory Completion)的相关处理时限统一,让发展商更容易规划工程预算和进度。

    过去,各机构的回应时间不同,发展商等待取得入伙证的时间可能较长。根据建设局发出的通告,在统一服务标准后,各机构从处理验收申请到给予答复,最长不超过21个工作日。

    新做法可缩短最多三天的等候时间,每年预计约900个相关文件申请可受惠。

    新标准提升建筑物的室内空气质量和能源效率

    新加坡标准理事会也公布三项全国标准和技术参考,以进一步改善建筑的室内空气质量和能源效率。

    根据新标准,舒适的冷气温度范围,应为摄氏24度至25.5度,比现有的标准提高0.5至1度。若冷气温度超过25.5度,也可通过增加空气流动如使用吊扇,以维持舒适度并降低能耗。

    国家环境局发言人受询时指出,更新后的标准,进一步提升本地应对空气传播疾病及环境健康风险的能力,同时兼顾能源效率与气候韧性。

    环境局和新加坡工程师学会鼓励建筑发展商和承包商,采用先进的通风策略和空气质量监测系统,以打造更健康、更可持续的建筑。新建项目应在规划和设计阶段纳入新标准,而现有建筑在进行重大翻新或系统升级时,也可分阶段实施。

    由工程师学会举办的2026年世界工程日活动,吸引超过1000人线上线下参与,现场也公布学会成立60周年的纪念标志。

  • 伊朗战争推高油价 多家航空公司机票起价


    发布/2026年3月10日 16:10 | 联合早报

    随着中东冲突升级,亚洲多家航空公司正提高票价并制定应急计划,以应对石油危机带来的风险。图为越南航空班机降落在河内内排国际机场。 (法新社)

    随着中东冲突升级,亚洲多家航空公司正提高票价并制定应急计划,包括停飞部分航班,以应对石油危机带来的风险。

    彭博社引述知情人士报道,印度航空公司已将长途航线票价上调15%,并考虑进一步涨价。

    香港航空星期二(3月10日)宣布,从本月12日起上调多条航线燃油附加费,其中中国内地航线附加费增加5港元(0.80新元),飞往北美等地的长途航线则增加150港元(约24新元)。

    知情人士透露,东南亚廉价航空公司已开始制定应急方案,若航空燃油价格高不可企或供应中断,将考虑停飞部分航班。

    另据路透社报道,新西兰航空星期二宣布,国内航线单程经济舱票价上调10新西兰元(约7.50新元),短途国际航线上调20新西兰元,长途航线上调90新西兰元。若航空燃油成本持续居高不下,可能进一步调整票价、航线网络及航班时间表。

    越南官方媒体警告称,鉴于越南对进口航空燃油的依赖,机票价格可能上涨高达70%。

    据报道,越南航空已向越南政府寻求取消航空燃油环保税以维持运营。

    越南政府指出,受燃油价格上涨影响,越南航空公司运营成本已攀升60%至70%,且燃油供应商正面临难以满足航空公司需求的困境。

    伊朗战争推高油价 多家航空公司机票起价

    发布/2026年3月10日 16:10 | 联合早报

    随着中东冲突升级,亚洲多家航空公司正提高票价并制定应急计划,以应对石油危机带来的风险。图为越南航空班机降落在河内内排国际机场。 (法新社)

    随着中东冲突升级,亚洲多家航空公司正提高票价并制定应急计划,包括停飞部分航班,以应对石油危机带来的风险。

    彭博社引述知情人士报道,印度航空公司已将长途航线票价上调15%,并考虑进一步涨价。

    香港航空星期二(3月10日)宣布,从本月12日起上调多条航线燃油附加费,其中中国内地航线附加费增加5港元(0.80新元),飞往北美等地的长途航线则增加150港元(约24新元)。

    知情人士透露,东南亚廉价航空公司已开始制定应急方案,若航空燃油价格高不可企或供应中断,将考虑停飞部分航班。

    另据路透社报道,新西兰航空星期二宣布,国内航线单程经济舱票价上调10新西兰元(约7.50新元),短途国际航线上调20新西兰元,长途航线上调90新西兰元。若航空燃油成本持续居高不下,可能进一步调整票价、航线网络及航班时间表。

    越南官方媒体警告称,鉴于越南对进口航空燃油的依赖,机票价格可能上涨高达70%。

    据报道,越南航空已向越南政府寻求取消航空燃油环保税以维持运营。

    越南政府指出,受燃油价格上涨影响,越南航空公司运营成本已攀升60%至70%,且燃油供应商正面临难以满足航空公司需求的困境。