2026-04-13T21:45:48.130Z / 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）
作者：凯文·利普塔克、阿莱娜·特里恩、亚当·克兰恩
更新于2分钟前
更新时间：2026年4月13日美国东部时间晚上7:57
发布时间：2026年4月13日美国东部时间下午5:45
周一，人们透过椭圆形办公室的窗户看到唐纳德·特朗普总统。
美国及该地区官员周一表示，美伊之间未能取得突破的马拉松式会谈并非谈判的最终结果。
据知情人士透露，如果特朗普认为伊朗准备接受其要求，总统唐纳德·特朗普仍愿意尽快恢复面对面谈判。
一位熟悉谈判情况的消息人士告诉CNN，特朗普政府官员正在内部讨论在4月21日停火协议到期前与伊朗官员举行第二轮面对面会议的细节，但目前尚不清楚此类会议能否成行。
该消息人士称，如果未来几日美伊及该地区调解方的谈判取得进展，官员们正在研究潜在的会议日期和地点，并表示相关讨论仍处于初步阶段。“如果局势朝那个方向发展，我们需要做好迅速启动相关安排的准备，”该消息人士说道。
但考虑到伊朗此前对美国的多项要求持抵制态度，即便美国周一上午开始对伊朗港口实施封锁，目前也不清楚德黑兰是否会在短期内接受特朗普的条件。官员们表示，双方都提议暂停伊朗铀浓缩活动，但迄今为止未能就双方都能接受的暂停期限达成一致。
随着霍尔木兹海峡实际仍处于关闭状态，伊朗认为自己对美国拥有巨大的谈判筹码，这一点在本周末于伊斯兰堡举行的谈判中已显露无遗。
特朗普和副总统JD·万斯则持不同看法：经过数周战争，伊朗已严重削弱，明智之举是接受他们的所有要求。官员们称，在他们看来，封锁是另一项施压策略——旨在加大对伊朗的压力，迫使伊朗以更妥协的姿态回到谈判桌前。
特朗普周一表示，伊朗当天早些时候曾致电本届政府，“他们非常想达成一项协议”。他未透露打电话者的身份，也未说明华盛顿方面是谁接听了电话。就在一天前，他还曾表示不在乎能否达成协议。
封锁也给局势带来了新的不确定性——例如，目前尚不清楚美国愿意在多大程度上动用军事手段强制执行封锁，以及伊朗在未来数日和数周内会作何反应。
熟悉谈判情况的人士表示，政府官员仍希望能够找到外交解决方案。他们称，根据未来几日谈判的进展速度，美伊双方也可以延长停火期限，以争取更多时间。
“美伊之间仍在持续接触，为达成协议而推进的努力也在向前迈进，”一位美国官员说道。
一位地区消息人士告诉CNN，可能会举行新一轮谈判，土耳其正致力于弥合双方的分歧。周六在伊斯兰堡举行的21小时会谈，是数周来美伊及包括巴基斯坦、土耳其、埃及和阿曼等在内的中间方谈判的高潮。
在各方就伊斯兰堡达成一致之前，曾有多个地点被提出作为周六谈判的举办地，包括日内瓦、维也纳和伊斯坦布尔。该熟悉谈判的消息人士称，日内瓦和伊斯兰堡再次被列为下一轮会谈的潜在地点。
谈判中的症结所在
据熟悉谈判情况的消息人士透露，尽管周六的会谈时长超出预期，但政府官员始终认为，一次会议不太可能达成最终协议。官员们原本预计，上周末的会谈很可能是为期两周停火期间多轮谈判中的一轮。
消息人士称，特朗普及其许多核心顾问都迫切希望停火协议能够取得成功，希望双方能够达成外交解决方案。许多政府官员几乎没有恢复军事打击的意愿，不少人也意识到美国民众也对战争感到越来越不耐烦。
万斯在周日早些时候离开伊斯兰堡时表示，他已提出了一份“最终且最佳”的方案，暗示伊朗仍有时间接受美国的所有条件。
周一，他表示主动权掌握在伊朗手中。
“他们朝着我们的方向迈出了一步，”他在接受福克斯新闻主持人布雷特·拜尔采访时说道，“但他们的步子还不够大。”
他补充道：“我认为，这里确实存在一项可以达成的宏大协议，但我认为，接下来的步骤要由伊朗来采取。”
副总统JD·万斯在周日于巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡与巴基斯坦和伊朗代表举行会议后的新闻发布会上发表讲话，贾里德·库什纳（中）和史蒂夫·威特科夫（左）在旁聆听。
但美国为伊朗设定的许多“红线”都是德黑兰此前拒绝接受的条款。
据一位白宫官员透露，不可谈判的参数包括伊朗终止所有铀浓缩活动；拆除其主要的核浓缩设施——这些设施在6月美军的一次空袭中已严重受损；以及找回据称被埋在地下的400多公斤高浓缩铀。
核分歧似乎与战争爆发前并无二致。正是伊朗拒绝放弃铀浓缩活动并交出400公斤接近武器级的铀，导致此前由史蒂夫·威特科夫和贾里德·库什纳主导的一轮谈判陷入停滞。
一位熟悉讨论情况的消息人士称，周六在伊斯兰堡，美国谈判代表提议伊朗接受20年的铀浓缩暂停期。据一位美国官员透露，伊朗方面回应提出5年的暂停期限，遭到了美国的拒绝。
特朗普此前曾声称，美国和伊朗将共同清除他所谓的“核尘埃”，但伊朗似乎并未为之所动。
目前尚不清楚美国此前提出的“美国向伊朗提供十年核燃料，以换取德黑兰暂停所有铀浓缩活动”的提案是否仍在谈判桌上。
据特朗普及其他熟悉谈判情况的人士透露，尽管周六的谈判在某些时刻十分艰难，但双方在闭门会谈数小时后，彼此之间产生了一定程度的尊重。
万斯周一表示，在巴基斯坦的伊朗谈判团队并未具备“达成协议”的权限，他们必须返回德黑兰争取批准——这表明美国最终离开伊斯兰堡的原因正在于此。
据伊朗外交部长阿巴斯·阿拉格奇表示，会谈在最后一刻之前进展得卓有成效。
“在47年来最高级别密集会谈中，伊朗秉持诚意与美国接触，以结束战争，”他在X平台上写道，“但就在距离‘伊斯兰堡谅解备忘录’仅一步之遥时，我们遭遇了极端主义、不断变更的目标和封锁。”
特朗普为何转而实施封锁
美国海军封锁凸显出，随着美国官员日益清楚地意识到伊朗愿意且有能力承受数周的炮击以维持对航道的控制，重新开放霍尔木兹海峡迅速成为这场战争的首要目标。
但此举也给美国海军带来了新的风险，他们正在这片争议水域应对伊朗快艇、无人机和水雷构成的非对称威胁。特朗普政府此前曾推迟采取如此激进的举措，希望找到其他方法来增加海峡的石油流通量并压低能源价格——包括提供船舶再保险、提出海军护航的可能性，甚至解除对伊朗石油销售的部分制裁。
一位熟悉内部讨论的人士透露，随着伊朗政权巩固权力，并暗示计划实施一项永久性的收费制度，以维持对该航道的控制，美国官员在过去几周开始更认真地筹划切断伊朗的主要收入来源。
能源分析师表示，封锁或许是特朗普为削弱伊朗对海峡的控制而日渐减少的选项中最佳的一个，他们认为这比地面入侵风险低得多，也比继续美军的空袭行动更有可能取得成功。
欧亚集团负责伊朗和能源领域的高级分析师格雷戈里·布鲁表示，伊朗政权至少可以在未来三到四周内承受经济压力，之后才会出现严重的危机。
但由于几周前特朗普更侧重于增加全球石油供应而非重新控制海峡，当时美国解除了对伊朗石油的制裁，这可能会让封锁的效果延后显现。此前的宽松政策允许伊朗向其他国家多出口数百万桶石油，这些国家突然获得了直接购买伊朗石油的许可，这为伊朗提供了更多的财政缓冲，以抵御封锁带来的冲击。
“他们已经有石油在海上运输了，”布鲁说道，“这意味着他们可以在一段时间内顶住封锁。”
与此同时，封锁可能将考验白宫应对油价进一步上涨的能力。伊朗石油出口的停止意味着此前勉强通过海峡的石油将被完全切断，进一步加剧全球能源供应紧张——并将本已高企的美国汽油价格推得更高。
本文已更新补充最新进展。
CNN记者珍妮弗·汉斯勒对本文亦有贡献。
US eyes potential second round of in-person talks with Iran as blockade takes hold
2026-04-13T21:45:48.130Z / CNN
By Kevin Liptak, Alayna Treene, Adam Cancryn
Updated 2 min ago
Updated Apr 13, 2026, 7:57 PM ET
PUBLISHED Apr 13, 2026, 5:45 PM ET
President Donald Trump is seen through a window into the Oval Office, on Monday.
Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images
Marathon talks that failed to produce a breakthrough between the United States and Iran were not the final word in negotiations, officials in the US and the region said Monday.
And President Donald Trump remains open to resuming in-person negotiations soon if he believes Tehran is ready to submit to his demands, according to people familiar with the matter.
Trump officials are internally discussing details for a potential second, in-person meeting with Iranian officials before a ceasefire expires on April 21, a source familiar with the talks told CNN, though it’s unclear whether such a meeting would materialize.
Officials are looking at potential dates and locations should ongoing talks with Iran and mediators in the region progress in the coming days, the source said, describing the discussions as preliminary. “We need to be prepared to stand something up quickly should things head in that direction,” the source said.
But given previous Iranian resistance to a number of US demands, it is not clear Tehran would submit to Trump’s terms anytime soon, even as the US began a blockade of Iranian ports Monday morning. Both sides have proposed a suspension in Iranian uranium enrichment, but so far cannot settle on a mutually agreeable timespan for the moratorium, officials said.
And with the Strait of Hormuz still effectively closed, Iran believes it enjoys substantial leverage over the US, a position that was clear to negotiators in Islamabad this weekend.
Trump and Vice President JD Vance hold a different view: After weeks of war, Iran is badly weakened and would be wise to accept all of their demands. From their standpoint, the blockade is another pressure tactic — one intended to increase the temperature on Iran to return to talks in a more conciliatory fashion, officials said.
Trump said Monday that Iran had called the administration earlier that morning and that “they’d like to make a deal very badly.” He didn’t specify who had placed the call, or who in Washington had received it. Just a day earlier, he’d said he didn’t care whether a deal was struck.
The blockade has also injected fresh uncertainty into the situation — it remains unclear, for example, how far the US is willing to go militarily to enforce it and how Iran might react in the coming days and weeks.
Administration officials remain hopeful a diplomatic off-ramp is achievable, people familiar with the talks said. Depending on the pace of negotiations in the coming days, the US and Iran could also extend the ceasefire deadline to allow for more time, they said.
“There is continued engagement between the US and Iran and forward motion on trying to get an agreement,” a US official said.
A regional source told CNN there could be another round of negotiations and that Turkey is working to bridge the gaps between the two sides. Saturday’s 21-hour meeting in Islamabad was the culmination of weeks of negotiations with top-ranking US officials and intermediaries including Pakistan, but also Turkey, Egypt and Oman, among others.
Several locations for Saturday’s negotiations had been floated before all parties agreed on Islamabad, including Geneva, Vienna and Istanbul. Geneva and Islamabad are again on the table as potential options for another round, the source familiar with the talks said.
Sticking points in negotiations
Despite Saturday’s session lasting longer than expected, according to sources familiar with the talks, administration officials argue that one meeting was always unlikely to achieve a final agreement. Rather, officials had anticipated last weekend’s talks would likely be one of many negotiations over the course of the two-week ceasefire.
And Trump, as well as many of his closest advisers, is eager for the ceasefire to succeed and for the two sides to reach a diplomatic solution, the sources said. There is little appetite among many administration officials to see military attacks resume, with many acknowledging Americans are also growing impatient with the war.
Vance, as he was departing Islamabad early Sunday, said he’d placed a “best and final” offer on the table, suggesting there was still time for Iran to accept all the US conditions.
On Monday, he said the ball is in Iran’s court.
“They moved in our direction,” he told Fox News’ Bret Baier, “but they didn’t move far enough.”
He added: “There really is, I think, a grand deal to be had here, but it’s up to the Iranians, I think, to take the next step.”
Vice President JD Vance speaks as Jared Kushner, center, and Steve Witkoff, left, listen during a news conference after a meeting with representatives from Pakistan and Iran in Islamabad, Pakistan, on Sunday.
Jacquelyn Martin/Pool/Getty Images
But many of the “red lines” the US has set for Iran are terms Tehran has previously rejected.
According to a White House official, the non-negotiable parameters include Iran ending all of its uranium enrichment; dismantling its major nuclear enrichment facilities, which were badly damaged during a US bombing run in June; and retrieving the more than 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium believed to be buried underground.
The nuclear disagreement appears unchanged from before the war began. It was Iran’s refusal to give up enrichment and hand over the 400 kilograms of near-bomb grade uranium that caused an earlier round of negotiations, led by Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, to stall.
In Islamabad on Saturday, the American negotiators proposed Iran accept a 20-year pause in enriching uranium, a source familiar with the discussions said.Iran responded with a proposal for a five-year suspension, which the US has rejected, according to a US official.
Trump has previously claimed the US and Iran would work together to remove what he calls the “nuclear dust,” though Iran appeared unmoved.
It wasn’t clear whether a previous proposal, wherein the US would provide Iran with nuclear fuel for a decade in exchange for Tehran halting all enrichment, was still on the table.
While Saturday’s negotiations were tough at moments, the two sides did develop a measure of respect for one another after spending hours behind closed doors, according to Trump and other people familiar with the talks.
Vance said on Monday that the Iranian negotiating team in Pakistan had not been in position to “cut a deal” and that they had to return to Tehran to get approval — suggesting that’s why the US eventually left Islamabad.
According to Iran’s foreign minister, the meetings appeared to proceed fruitfully until the final moments.
“In intensive talks at highest level in 47 years, Iran engaged with U.S in good faith to end war,” Abbas Araghchi wrote on X. “But when just inches away from ‘Islamabad MoU’, we encountered maximalism, shifting goalposts, and blockade.”
Why Trump turned to a blockade
The US naval blockade underscores how reopening the Strait of Hormuz has rapidly become a top objective of the war as it became increasingly clear to US officials that Iran was both willing and able to endure weeks of shelling to maintain its grip on the waterway.
But it’s a move that also poses new risks for the US Navy, which is confronting the asymmetric threats of Iranian speed boats, drones and mines in the contested waterway. Trump officials had previously put off taking such a dramatic step in hopes of finding alternate ways that might boost the flow of oil through the strait and keep energy prices down — including offering to reinsure tankers, floating the prospect of naval escorts, and even lifting certain sanctions on Iran’s own oil sales.
A US destroyer conducts a mine-clearance operation in the Strait of Hormuz, on Saturday.
Sgt. 1st Class Michael Hunnisett/US Central Command Public Affairs
Yet with the Iranian regime consolidating power and signaling plans to impose a permanent tolling system that would keep it in control of the shipping lane, US officials in the last couple weeks began more serious planning to cut off Iran’s key source of income, a person familiar with the internal discussions said.
The blockade represents perhaps the best of Trump’s dwindling options to loosen Iran’s grip on the strait, said energy analysts who see it as far less risky than a ground invasion and more likely to succeed than continuing the US’ bombing campaign.
The regime can likely withstand the economic pressure for at least the next three to four weeks before the pain gets significant, said Gregory Brew, a senior analyst on Iran and the energy sector at Eurasia Group.
But it could take even longer due to the US lifting sanctions on Iranian oil weeks ago, when Trump was more focused on boosting global oil supplies than on retaking control of the strait. The prior leniency allowed Iran to ship out millions more barrels to other countries suddenly permitted to buy its oil outright, giving it more of a financial cushion to withstand the blockade.
“They already have oil on the water,” Brew said. “That suggests they could withstand a blockade for a little while.”
In meantime, the blockade will likely test the White House’s ability to manage even higher gas prices. The stoppage of Iranian oil exports means what little had been getting out of the strait will be completely cut off, further worsening the global energy supply crunch — and driving already expensive US gas prices even higher.
This story has been updated with additional developments.
CNN’s Jennifer Hansler contributed to this report.