Bill and Hillary Clinton now demand public hearings after initially skipping multiple deposition dates, with House threatening contempt

By Chad Pergram | Fox News

Published February 11, 2026 12:18pm EST

Since there was such a tempest over Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show, perhaps there’s a solution at hand. This compromise would satisfy both red and blue America. And the exhibition would transfix the country: Have former President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump testify at halftime about the Epstein files.

Republicans believe former President Clinton has something to hide about Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats think the same about President Trump. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the former president and Hillary Clinton to testify about the Epstein files. After a lot of wrangling, the Clintons are due to appear for closed-door depositions later this month.

But both Bill and Hillary Clinton are now calling for open sessions. And Democrats believe that such an appearance at a public session — by a former president — would establish a precedent to lug in President Trump to answer questions about what he knew about Epstein.

[Clintons request public testimony on Jeffrey Epstein connections]

Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram has the latest on the Clintons’ request for their testimony on Epstein connections and who one Democratic representative says is a ‘key witness’ on ‘Special Report.’

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

8 min

Since there was such a tempest over Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show, perhaps there’s a solution at hand. This compromise would satisfy both red and blue America. And the exhibition would transfix the country: Have former President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump testify at halftime about the Epstein files.

Republicans believe former President Clinton has something to hide about Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats think the same about President Trump. The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the former president and Hillary Clinton to testify about the Epstein files. After a lot of wrangling, the Clintons are due to appear for closed-door depositions later this month.

But both Bill and Hillary Clinton are now calling for open sessions. And Democrats believe that such an appearance at a public session — by a former president — would establish a precedent to lug in President Trump to answer questions about what he knew about Epstein.

[GHISLAINE MAXWELL TO APPEAR BEFORE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE LAWMAKERS FOR EPSTEIN PROBE DEPOSITION]

[image_1]

Hillary Clinton addresses supporters about the results of the U.S. election as former President Bill Clinton applauds in Manhattan, Nov. 9, 2016.(Reuters/Carlos Barria)

One architect of the law compelling the release of the Epstein files, applauded demands last week by the former first couple to testify at a televised open hearing. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said the former president is an important witness.

“As long as [the hearing is] focused on Epstein, and it’s not a wild goose chase — it’s not trying to score political points or embarrass either President Clinton or President Trump, it is asking legitimate questions about what they knew took place and who they knew were participating in heinous acts,” said Khanna. “That should be a legitimate point of inquiry.”

After agreeing to a closed-door deposition later this month, Hillary Clinton took to X. She wrote to Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., saying, “If you want this fight let’s have it in public.”

Former President Clinton echoed his wife the next day on X, also calling for a public session. The former commander in chief declared that he won’t be used “as a prop in a closed door Kangaroo Court.”

A spokeswoman for Comer accused the former first couple of “moving the goalposts.” Comer was always open to a hearing. But after a closed-door deposition.

“Depositions have historically been much more substantive than hearings,” said Comer. “Hearings unfortunately, have become more of an entertainment thing.”

[REVEALED: TRUMP CALLED POLICE CHIEF TO SUPPORT EPSTEIN PROBE, AND LAWMAKERS NAMED 6 MEN SHIELDED FROM EXPOSURE]

[image_2]

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer speaks to reporters after a closed-door deposition with Ghislaine Maxwell at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 9, 2026.(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

But the Clintons finally agreed to depositions at the end of this month. And once that was on the calendar, the duo began calling for public hearings.

There is a method behind this madness. There isn’t a loyalty among younger congressional Democrats to the Clintons. In fact, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was steamed at some Democrats for wanting the Clintons to appear. Younger Democrats don’t have the same reverence for the Clintons as older Democrats. Hillary Clinton ran for president a decade ago. She hasn’t been a senator since 2009. She last served as secretary of state in early 2013. President Clinton left the Oval Office more than a quarter-century ago.

However, this is the Democrats’ gambit:

If former President Clinton appears about the Epstein files, it may be tough to make the case that President Trump shouldn’t appear.

“Certainly it does set the precedent. President Trump was subpoenaed during the January 6th investigations and didn’t come in. He cited some form of executive privilege. And so we’re kind of forcing the Clintons to come in with the threat of criminal contempt. Then that is a precedent that we are setting,” said Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, D-Va. “In other countries, like the U.K., the prime minister regularly comes before the Parliament. And so it’s not like it’s unprecedented around the world.”

Granted, that’s a parliamentary system where the prime minister is a member of Parliament in the United Kingdom. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer appears for “Prime Minister’s Questions” every Wednesday at noon in London. Members of Parliament usually pepper the prime minister with questions and scoff in a scene which resembles something out of Monty Python.

But the American and British systems are fundamentally different.

Getting a sitting or former president — and even first lady — before Congress is rare but not unheard of.

[BONDI TO FACE GRILLING IN HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OVER EPSTEIN FILES, WEAPONIZATION ALLEGATIONS]

[image_3]

Former President Bill Clinton was seen in photos with Jeffrey Epstein as part of a DOJ Epstein files release on Friday, Dec. 19.(Department of Justice)

There are several prominent examples of sitting presidents appearing before Congress. President Abraham Lincoln testified voluntarily before the House Judiciary Committee in 1862. The New York Herald published his “State of the Union” message to Congress just before it was sent to Capitol Hill. Presidents sent written “reports” in those days. They did not give speeches to Congress. Lawmakers probed the leak of the message to Congress. It was speculated that Herald reporter Henry Wikoff got the message ahead of time thanks to his friendship with Mary Todd Lincoln. The House Sergeant-at-Arms briefly held Wikoff — and released him after the president spoke to the Judiciary Committee.

President Woodrow Wilson appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1919 to discuss a treaty with Germany and establishing the League of Nations. Wilson’s push for the League of Nations failed. The Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

President Gerald Ford had been in office two-and-a-half months before he appeared voluntarily before the House Judiciary Committee in the fall of 1974. Ford told lawmakers that his pardon of former President Richard Nixon wasn’t something they bargained about. Ford told the committee that he pardoned Nixon because his physical and mental health fell into a steep decline.

Former President Harry Truman appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1955 to testify about the United Nations charter.

Ford came back as a former president in 1983 for a Senate hearing on the bicentennial of the Constitution.

And there are examples of both sitting and former first ladies testifying, too.

Eleanor Roosevelt testified twice as first lady. Once about labor issues. Then, about the organization of volunteers for the civilian defense agency before World War II.

Rosalynn Carter testified about mental health as first lady.

Hillary Clinton famously testified about her husband’s healthcare plan — even though it was dubbed (often derisively) “Hillarycare” in the fall of 1993. She testified multiple times as secretary of state. Most notably in early 2013 regarding Benghazi.

And, first lady Laura Bush was en route to Capitol Hill to testify before a Senate panel about early childhood education on 9/11. The committee canceled the hearing after the attacks in New York and at the Pentagon.

[CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP]

So, many Republicans are game to hear from the Clintons about the Epstein files. Frankly, some were more interested in just holding them in contempt than actually gleaning anything about Epstein. But it looks like the Clintons will at least sit for depositions in a few weeks. Whether there’s a hearing or not is unclear. Some Republicans may even push for that. But caveat emptor. An open session for the Clintons will only intensify the push by Democrats — and some GOPers — to hear from President Trump.

Their testimony might not come during the Super Bowl halftime show. But open testimony by a former president and a sitting president would be a political Super Bowl.

Chad Pergram currently serves as Chief Congressional Correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC). He joined the network in September 2007 and is based out of Washington, D.C.

Russia agrees to abide by expired New START nuclear arms limits — as long as US does the same

President Donald Trump calls for ‘new, improved’ nuclear arms deal while Russia’s Vladimir Putin offers to stick to terms of expired agreement

By Rachel Wolf
Fox News

Published February 11, 2026 1:29pm EST

Russia has reportedly agreed to abide by the limits of a nuclear arms pact it reached with the U.S. years ago after the agreement expired last week — as long as Washington does the same.

The New START Treaty’s expiration, which occurred on Feb. 5, leaves the nations with the two largest atomic arsenals with no restrictions for the first time in more than a half-century, The Associated Press reported. The expiration has fueled fears of a possible unconstrained nuclear arms race.

In September, President Vladimir Putin said Russia would abide by the nuclear arms deal for another year after its expiration date as long as the U.S. followed suit, the AP reported. However, President Donald Trump has said he wanted China to be part of a new pact, something that Beijing has rejected, according to the AP.

“Rather than extend ‘NEW START’ (A badly negotiated deal by the United States that, aside from everything else, is being grossly violated), we should have our Nuclear Experts work on a new, improved, and modernized Treaty that can last long into the future,” Trump wrote on Truth Social upon the treaty’s expiration.

WORLD ENTERS UNCHARTED ERA AS US-RUSSIA NUCLEAR TREATY EXPIRES, OPENING DOOR TO FASTEST ARMS RACE IN DECADES

President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin meet in Anchorage, Alaska.(Reuters/Kevin Lamarque)

In response to Fox News Digital’s request for comment on the now-expired treaty, the White House pointed to the president’s Truth Social post.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov spoke to lawmakers about the treaty, saying Moscow would “act in a responsible and balanced way on the basis of analysis of the U.S. military policies,” the AP reported.

Lavrov added that “we have reason to believe that the United States is in no hurry to abandon [these limits] and that they will be observed for the foreseeable future.”

A rocket is launched as part of a ground-based intercontinental ballistic missile test at the Plesetsk facility in Russia on Dec. 9, 2020.(Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP, File)

“We will closely monitor how things are actually unfolding,” Lavrov said. “If our American colleagues’ intention to maintain some kind of cooperation on this is confirmed, we will work actively on a new agreement and consider the issues that have remained outside strategic stability agreements.”

TRUMP CALLS FOR NUCLEAR EXPERTS TO WORK ON ‘NEW, IMPROVED, AND MODERNIZED TREATY’

The New START Treaty was signed in 2010 by President Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart, Dmitry Medvedev, and was entered into force on Feb. 5, 2011.

The treaty gave the U.S. and Russia until Feb. 5, 2018, to meet the central limits on strategic offensive arms. The treaty caps each side at 700 deployed ICBMs, SLBMs and nuclear-capable heavy bombers; 1,550 deployed warheads; and 800 deployed and non-deployed launchers and bombers. The parties were then obligated to maintain the limits as long as the treaty remained in force, which it did until last week.

President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands during a press conference following their meeting on Ukraine, in Anchorage, Alaska,, Aug. 15, 2025.(Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The expiration of the treaty comes just after a meeting involving U.S. and Russian officials in Abu Dhabi. Axios previously reported that the two nations were closing in on a deal to observe the treaty for at least six months after its expiration. The outlet added that during the six-month period there would be negotiations for a new deal.

The State Department did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Rachel Wolf is a breaking news writer for Fox News Digital and FOX Business.

TikTok to launch local feed that taps users’ geolocation data

February 11, 2026 / 12:37 PM EST / CBS News

TikTok said Wednesday it’s rolling out a new local feed that shows videos from nearby businesses and services based on users’ precise geolocation data.

Users of the social media platform will now see a new tab on their app called “Local” that leads to content related to nearby travel, events, restaurants and shopping, as well as posts from local creators, the company said in a statement. The local tab won’t appear in accounts owned by people younger than 18, those who have a private account or who set their privacy settings to “friends” or “only you,” it added.

The service is rolling out after TikTok drew backlash in January when it updated its privacy policy to state that it may collect “precise location information” from users’ devices if they enable location services in their device settings. Some users described such data collection as “invasive,” although TikTok’s terms noted that people could turn off the geolocation tracking in their settings.

On Wednesday, TikTok emphasized that sharing geolocation data is voluntary and that other apps rely on similar information about their users.

“This approach is consistent with how many modern apps use location today and gives people the choice to enable it when they want more relevant, local experiences, while keeping them in control,” TikTok said.

TikTok said that geolocation tracking is set to “off” by default and, if turned on, will only be active when the app is in use.

The social media service rolled out the new privacy policy in January on the same day that it split from its prior owner, China-based ByteDance. TikTok’s new ownership includes software maker Oracle, private equity firm Silver Lake and Abu Dhabi-based investment firm MGX, which together own a combined 45% of the company.

Another 35% stake in TikTok is owned by eight other investors, including Dell CEO Michael Dell’s personal investment office. ByteDance will retain 19.9% of the business, just below the 20% ownership cap allowed under federal law.

Edited by Alain Sherter

Pharma companies left out of Trump’s drug-pricing deals look for way in

February 11, 2026 5:58 PM UTC / Reuters

By Michael Erman

节点运行失败

U.S. dollar banknotes and medicines are seen in this illustration taken, June 27, 2024. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

• Summary
• Companies

• Companies are concerned about new Medicare pricing programs
• Smaller companies have formed a new industry lobby group
• 16 of the largest drug companies have signed deals with the Trump administration

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb 11 (Reuters) – Some pharmaceutical companies not targeted by President Donald Trump for agreements to lower their U.S. drug pricing are looking to craft their own deals in an attempt to avoid potentially onerous tariffs and new price-setting schemes, according to six industry sources.

Two lobbyists and other industry sources say that companies have begun reaching out to contacts at the White House and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to try to create their own deals. They did not disclose the names of those companies.

Keep up with the latest medical breakthroughs and healthcare trends with the Reuters Health Rounds newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Report Ad

“The Trump administration of course wants to negotiate deals that meaningfully lower drug prices for American patients with every pharmaceutical company,” White House spokesman Kush Desai said in an email.

The administration has not communicated to companies how they can potentially proceed if they did not receive a letter from Trump, one industry source said.

Companies are concerned in particular about new pilot programs that could set prices for Medicare drugs in large parts of the country, industry sources said. Those programs would require manufacturer rebates for drugs paid for by the Medicare health plan for millions of Americans age 65 and over if U.S. prices exceed international levels.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

COMPANIES THAT DID NOT STRIKE DEALS

---

So far, 16 of the largest drugmakers including Pfizer (PFE.N), opens new tab and Eli Lilly (LLY.N), opens new tab have already struck deals with the government after receiving directive letters from the Trump administration instructing them to cut prices. But many companies, including around half of those represented by the largest pharmaceutical lobby group, PhRMA, have not yet been contacted.

Bayer (BAYGn.DE), opens new tab Global Head of Pharmaceuticals Stefan Oelrich said in an interview that he expects companies like his that did not receive letters from Trump will be given the opportunity to strike similar deals to their competitors.

“Otherwise that would be very odd, that only because you have size that you would get different treatment,” he said.

Some smaller companies have formed their own industry lobby group called the Midsized Biotech Alliance of America in part to advocate against the new price-setting schemes. The 11 companies that have joined that organization include Alkermes (ALKS.O), opens new tab, BioMarin (BMRN.O), opens new tab, Incyte (INCY.O), opens new tab and Alnylam (ALNY.O), opens new tab.

“There’s a large group of companies that don’t have a deal and what are they left with?” Sanofi (SASY.PA), opens new tab CEO Paul Hudson told reporters at the JP Morgan Healthcare Conference in San Francisco in January.

According to Hudson, the nature of the deals, which some companies have said exempt them from future government price-setting initiatives, could make it hard for the government to offer similar options to smaller companies.

“It’s very difficult to deliver 30, 50, 80 deals from here. There may just be a sort of catch-all offer from the government or something to try and manage it a certain way,” said Hudson, who is set to take over as chairman of PhRMA later this year.

AVOIDING PRICE SETTING IN MEDICARE

---

U.S. patients currently pay by far the most for prescription medicines, often nearly three times more than in other developed nations.

The deals that the large drugmakers signed committed them to lowering prices on drugs sold in the U.S. Medicaid program for low-income Americans. Analysts have noted that the impact will be mitigated by the fact that Medicaid accounts for only 10% of U.S. drug spending and has price discounts exceeding 80% in some cases.

But drugmakers that do not have deals would be subject to Medicare pilots – called GLOBE and GUARD – that would introduce most-favored-nation-style pricing in the much larger Medicare program, bringing those prices in line with the lower prices paid outside the U.S.

One concern is that some smaller drugmakers have licensed their drugs to international companies for sale overseas, where partners have no incentive to raise their prices, potentially forcing the U.S. companies to slash prices for Medicare.

Another concern of mid-sized drugmakers is that they have fewer products to make deals with compared to larger companies, meaning that they may not have lower-revenue drugs to sacrifice.

“A lot of them are very worried that… they’re going to get stuck with what the bigger guys did that works for them and doesn’t work for the mid-sized guys,” one pharmaceutical industry lobbyist said.

Reporting by Michael Erman; editing by Caroline Humer and Bill Berkrot

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Cardi B’s Super Bowl halftime show cameo ignites a prediction market dispute

February 11, 2026 / 1:07 PM EST / CBS News

Cardi B’s appearance during Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show has stirred debate among prediction market users, raising questions about whether she actually “performed.”

Prediction markets users placed divergent bets on whether the rapper would perform at the halftime show, which the NFL says drew approximately 128 million viewers.

When Cardi B took the stage on Sunday, the Grammy winner danced alongside celebrities including Karol G, Young Miko, Jessica Alba and Pedro Pascal on a pink porch set. But it was unclear if the artist was singing, creating a murky situation for the nation’s most prominent prediction markets.

Polymarket is scheduled to issue a final decision on Wednesday, while Kalshi is facing a backlash after choosing not to declare a winner, citing ambiguity in whether Cardi B sang during her halftime appearance.

Kalshi instead settled the market at the last traded price before it was paused — paying 74 cents per contract to “No” holders and 26 cents to “Yes” holders — effectively issuing partial payouts.

That decision prompted one Kalshi user to file a complaint with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the independent U.S. agency that regulates prediction markets.

Millions wagered on the halftime show

---

Prediction markets allow users to wager on the outcome of future events, typically by responding to “yes” or “no” questions — called event contracts — and putting down a buy-in amount.

Leading up to the Super Bowl, Kalshi and Polymarket hosted event contracts revolving around whether Cardi B, among other artists, would perform, which racked up $47.3 million and $10 million in trade volume, respectively.

Pedro Pascal, Karol G and Cardi B perform during the Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show at Levi’s Stadium on Feb. 8, 2026, in Santa Clara, California. Kevin Mazur

Some Polymarket users hashed out the debate in the comments section of the event contract, with some claiming they were scammed.

“There’s no way that you would count a cameo as a performance,” one person wrote. Another argued that a “performance” does not exclusively mean singing.

Polymarket did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Kalshi also faced a backlash from some users over the halftime show. In the complaint with the CFTC, one user — who purchased a “yes” contract — said that as a result of Kalshi’s decision to settle the market price at the mid-trading value, they received $1,300 instead of $5,000. The user is seeking $3,700 in reparations.

In response, one user filed a complaint with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), first reported by the Event Horizon newsletter and posted by Front Office Sports. The user, who purchased a “yes” contract, claims that as a result of Kalshi’s decision to settle the market price at the mid-trading value, they received $1,300 instead of $5,000. The user is seeking $3,700 in compensation.

CFTC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“The rules were clear. Under the full rules, singing and dancing counted as a performance, but just dancing in the background did not,” a Kalshi spokesperson said in an email to CBS News. “In the as-broadcast performance, Cardi B was dancing and mouthing words to the song, but it was unclear if she was ‘singing’.”

On the day of the Super Bowl, Kalshi reported a daily record high of more than $1 billion in trading across its site, up 2,700% from last year.

Wagering on sports events has faced some pushback from states including Connecticut, which is arguing that platforms offering “sports events contracts” are illegal.

Some regulators, however, appear to be shifting their stances. In late January, CFTC Chair Michael Selig directed the agency to withdraw a 2024 rule proposal that sought to prohibit political and sports-related contracts. Selig said the advisory “contributed to uncertainty in our markets.”

Edited by Aimee Picchi

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/details-on-the-making-of-bad-bunnys-super-bowl-halftime-show/

Schumer, Dems choose partial shutdown as negotiations hit impasse

Schumer says Democrats will not back short-term funding extension that maintains ‘status quo’ on ICE operations

By Alex Miller
Fox News

Published February 11, 2026 12:53pm EST

[Congress debates DHS funding, ICE reform amidst potential Homeland Security shutdown]

Rep. Lance Gooden, R-Texas, slams Democrats for putting TSA funding at risk and ‘standing against law enforcement’ ahead of immigration enforcement leaders’ testimony on Capitol Hill.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

3 min

[Senate Democrats] aren’t budging on their Homeland Security demands, and appear ready to again thrust the government into a partial shutdown as Republicans scramble to keep the lights on.

Senate Minority Leader [Chuck Schumer], D-N.Y., announced that he and Senate Democrats were prepared to reject a short-term funding extension, known as a continuing resolution (CR), for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) just days ahead of the funding deadline.

“We’re 3 days away from a [DHS shutdown], and Republicans have not gotten serious about negotiating a solution that reins in [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] and stops the violence,” Schumer said on X. “Democrats will not support a CR to extend the status quo.”

[SHUTDOWN CLOCK TICKS AS SCHUMER, DEMOCRATS DIG IN ON DHS FUNDING DEMANDS]

[Image 45]

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced that Democrats wouldn’t accept a funding extension to DHS with just days left until a partial shutdown.(Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Congress has until Friday at midnight to fund the agency, and as the days go by, the odds of doing so are becoming increasingly slim.

Schumer’s edict comes as both sides of the aisle continue negotiations behind the scenes on a compromise bill to fund the agency.

Senate Democrats unveiled the legislative text of their 10-point proposal over the weekend, and for a time, Republicans were optimistic that talks were moving in a positive direction.

[SCHUMER, JEFFRIES TRASH TRUMP’S DHS PROPOSAL AS ‘INCOMPLETE AND INSUFFICIENT’]

[Image 46]

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., arrives for a news conference after a policy luncheon on Capitol Hill on Feb. 3, 2026, in Washington.(Mariam Zuhaib/AP Photo)

Now, [Schumer and his caucus] are at an impasse with Republicans and the White House. While President Donald Trump and his administration presented a counteroffer earlier this week, Democrats say it’s not enough.

Senate Majority Leader [John Thune], R-S.D., teed up the original DHS funding bill for another vote on Tuesday. That bill could be modified to be a CR, and Republicans are leaning toward a four-week extension to keep the agency open.

And he noted that the legislative text from the White House could be coming on Wednesday.

[SENATE RACES TO AVERT THIRD SHUTDOWN AS DHS DEAL TAKES SHAPE]

[Image 48]

President Donald Trump arrives at a dedication ceremony for a portion of Southern Boulevard that the Town of Palm Beach Council recently voted to rename President Donald J. Trump Boulevard at his Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, Jan. 16, 2026.(Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo)

“There’s going to be the legislative text coming over from the White House today,” Thune told reporters. “But I think it’s, like I said, the White House is operating in good faith.”

Still, Democrats have dubbed the GOP’s counter, which has been kept under strict lock and key, “sophomoric talking points.” However, several items from their proposal, like requiring [Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents] to obtain judicial warrants, demask, and have identification, are red lines for the White House and Republicans.

[CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP]

Whether the GOP can siphon off enough votes to avert a partial shutdown remains an open question, given the unified front Schumer and his caucus are presenting. And they will have a math problem of their own to contend with in trying to break the 60-vote filibuster.

Sen. [Mitch McConnell], R-Ky., who was discharged from the hospital on Tuesday, “will be working from home this week,” his office said in a statement.

Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.

Russia says again that it will stick to limits on nuclear weapons in expired New START treaty, if U.S. does

February 11, 2026 / 12:23 PM EST / CBS News

Russia will continue to observe the limits set under the recently-expired New START nuclear arms reduction treaty if the United States does the same, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Wednesday.

“We proceed from the fact that this moratorium, on our part, which was announced by our president, will remain in effect, but only as long as the United States does not exceed the aforementioned limits,” Lavrov said, addressing the lower house of Russia’s parliament.

The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) was signed in 2010 between the U.S. and Russia. It limited the number of strategic nuclear warheads that both countries could have deployed to 1,550, and included verification measures such as on-site inspections and data exchanges designed to ensure compliance.

The pact was originally set to expire in February 2021, but it was extended for five years by former President Joe Biden, keeping it in force until February 2026.

President Vladimir Putin said last year that Russia was prepared to continue abiding by the treaty’s core limits if the U.S. did the same, and Lavrov’s latest remarks reaffirm that position in the wake of the pact’s expiry.

A Russian BTR-82A armored personnel carrier and Yars intercontinental ballistic missile systems drive in Red Square during a parade on Victory Day, marking the 77th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany in World War II, in Moscow, Russia May 9, 2022. EVGENIA NOVOZHENINA/REUTERS

According to The Associated Press, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also said last week that Russia would “retain its responsible, thorough approach to stability when it comes to nuclear weapons. And, of course, it will be guided primarily by its national interests.”

Debate continues in the U.S. over the future of strategic arms control.

President Trump has previously argued that any nuclear agreement should include China, which has expanded its nuclear arsenal in recent years. Beijing has repeatedly rejected calls to join trilateral nuclear arms control talks, however, noting that its weapons stockpile is significantly smaller than those of the U.S. and Russia.

A White House official told CBS News in January that the president would decide a path forward on nuclear arms control “which he will clarify on his own timeline.”

Last week, the U.S. and Russia agreed to reestablish formal, high-level military communications that were suspended in late 2021, prior to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

But there has been no indication of progress toward a new agreement to regulate the arsenals of the world’s two biggest nuclear powers.

Mr. Trump directed the Pentagon in October to resume testing of nuclear weapons “on an equal basis” with other countries’ tests, a move which could end a U.S. pause that stretches back to the end of the Cold War.

“Because of other countries’ testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis,” the president wrote on Truth Social, using his administration’s preferred term for the Defense Department. “That process will begin immediately.”

Days later, Putin instructed his government to submit proposals on the possible resumption of nuclear weapons testing in Russia.

During a meeting with his Security Council, Putin said Russia had adhered to the international Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which prohibits nuclear test explosions, but he said, “if the United States or any other state party to the Treaty was to conduct such tests, Russia would be under obligation to take reciprocal measures.”

Lindsey Vonn says she had third surgery, is making “slow” progress after crash at 2026 Winter Olympics

February 11, 2026 / 1:33 PM EST / CBS News

[Lindsey Vonn] says she underwent a third round of surgery Wednesday and is making “slow” progress as she recovers from a crash that broke her leg during her downhill Olympic race on Sunday.

The surgery was successful, she said in a post on Instagram. She also shared photos of herself in her hospital bed with a metal frame attached to her leg.

“Success today has a completely different meaning than it did a few days ago,” she posted. “I’m making progress and while it is slow, I know I’ll be ok.”

She said she is thankful for the incredible medical staff, family and friends who have been by her side and for “the beautiful outpouring of love and support from people around the world.”

“Also, huge congrats to my teammates and all of the Team USA athletes who are out there inspiring me and giving me something to cheer for,” she posted.

[Vonn]crashed seconds into her race after deciding to compete despite rupturing her left ACL in a prior crash during a World Cup event in the Swiss Alps a week before.

The 41-year-old American came out of retirement to compete in the[2026 Winter Olympics]and had said she felt confident she could still complete the race with the help of a knee brace.

Tillis rips ‘political lawfare’ and praises grand jury after Dems avoid charges in ‘illegal orders’ case

Sen Thom Tillis praised the decision, called prosecution attempt a move that ‘undermines America’s criminal justice system’

By Alex Miller
Fox News

Published February 11, 2026 11:21am EST

Retired U.S. Navy SEAL officer Jocko Willink discusses Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., facing discipline for encouraging the military to disobey ‘illegal orders’ on ‘Hannity.’

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

3 min

A Senate Republican known for breaking with the Trump administration praised a grand jury’s decision not to indict several congressional Democrats who urged service members to refuse what they described as “illegal orders.”

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., applauded a Washington, D.C., grand jury’s decision to reject an indictment against six congressional Democrats who last year called on service members to refuse what they characterized as illegal orders under the Trump administration.

“Political lawfare waged by either side undermines America’s criminal justice system, which is the gold standard of the world,” Tillis said in a post on X. “Thankfully in this instance, a jury saw the attempted indictments for what they really were. Political lawfare is not normal, not acceptable, and needs to stop.”

GRAND JURY REJECTS DOJ EFFORT TO INDICT DEMOCRATIC LAWMAKERS WHO URGED MILITARY TO DEFY ILLEGAL ORDERS

Sen. Thom Tillis joined several congressional Democrats in cheering the failed indictment against a cohort of lawmakers who called on military service members to “refuse illegal orders.”(Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

It’s not the first time Tillis has bucked the administration. He has placed holds on future Homeland Security nominees, pledged to block President Donald Trump’s pick to replace outgoing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, and has been a vocal critic of the president’s advisors, including White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.

Meanwhile, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, the top federal prosecutor in the nation’s capital, sought to bring criminal charges against Sens. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., and Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., along with Reps. Maggie Goodlander, D-N.H., Jason Crow, D-Colo., Chris Deluzio, D-Pa., and Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa.

The group of Democrats — all of whom previously served in the military or as intelligence officers — last year said service members could “refuse illegal orders” and “must refuse illegal orders,” arguing that troops are not required to carry out commands they believe violate the Constitution.

DEM SENATOR SAYS SHE’S UNDER FEDERAL INVESTIGATION OVER ‘UNLAWFUL ORDERS’ VIDEO

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro speaks during a news conference on crime in the White House briefing room on Aug. 11, 2025.(Eric Lee/For The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Service members are obligated to follow lawful orders from their superiors, but they may refuse orders deemed illegal, according to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the military justice system enacted in 1951.

Their video prompted Trump to accuse the group of seditious behavior “PUNISHABLE BY DEATH” in a fiery Truth Social post.

GRAHAM DEMANDS DEMOCRATS EXPLAIN ‘REFUSE ILLEGAL ORDERS’ MESSAGE TO TROOPS

Sen. Mark Kelly speaks to members of the media outside federal court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, Feb. 3, 2026.(Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

After the grand jury declined to indict them, the lawmakers praised the decision.

“Donald Trump wants every American to be too scared to speak out against him,” Kelly said in a statement. “The most patriotic thing any of us can do is not back down.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Slotkin added that no matter what comes next from the administration in its pursuit of legal recourse, “tonight we can score one for the Constitution, our freedom of speech, and the rule of law.”

Fox News Digital did not immediately hear back from Pirro’s office for comment.

Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.

Why one ex-FBI agent thinks the person in Nancy Guthrie surveillance video is not a career criminal

Updated on: February 11, 2026 / 12:33 PM EST / CBS News

A former FBI agent believes the person who was caught on video outside Nancy Guthrie’s home is “not a career criminal.”

“However, they have to have a criminal mindset in order to commit a heinous crime like this,” Lance Leising, a retired supervisory special agent with the FBI, told “CBS Mornings” on Wednesday.

Nancy Guthrie, the mother of “Today” show host Savannah Guthrie, was reported missing 10 days ago after she missed church, and officials believe she was abducted overnight from her Tucson home.

Leising has drawn clues from video and images that were released by authorities on Tuesday, showing a masked individual outside Nancy Guthrie’s home the night she disappeared. The person is wearing gloves, a backpack and what appears to be a weapon.

Leising called the person’s actions “extremely amateurish.”

“If you look at the two still photos and the videos that Kash Patel released, one of them, the subject is not even wearing the backpack or the weapon, potential weapon,” Leising said. “So what that says to me is he approached that door and turned around and got the backpack and got the weapon and then came back.”

He also said the apparent weapon was held in “an unusual way” and “it does not look very professional, it looks very amateur.”

Two of the images released by the FBI of a subject seen on surveillance video in the Nancy Guthrie case. FBI

Leising also analyzed how the person approached Nancy Guthrie’s door, noting that their head was down as if they expected a surveillance camera above them.

“They almost feel surprised that there is a doorbell camera there, which anyone who has done any reconnaissance would know that’s there,” he said.

“Then they take some irrational step to grab a bush or a weed from the front yard and then put that in front as they try to take it off,” he noted.

He also highlighted the gloves the person was wearing, describing them as “oversized, maybe multiple layers,” which would make it difficult to use the apparent weapon he was carrying.

Two of the images released by the FBI of a subject seen on surveillance video in the Nancy Guthrie case. FBI

“I do think that it gives investigators hope that if they’re amateur at the door, they’ve made other mistakes, and they’re looking for that break,” Leising added.

Jason Pack, a retired FBI special agent, also noted that the video shows where an apparent weapon is located and the person’s gait, adding “he doesn’t appear to be moving very quickly.”

“All of those things will tell profilers certain things that they’re gonna look for and kind of narrow that timeline down,” he said.

Authorities release detained man

---

Authorities said they detained a person in connection with the Guthrie case on Tuesday during a traffic stop. A man, who only wanted to be identified as Carlos, later told reporters that he had been detained and released, and that “I didn’t do anything. … I’m innocent.” Law enforcement has not confirmed if Carlos was the person they said they had detained.

Leising said “a lot of times you’re going to detain people, bring them in for questioning and they may not be the suspect but they might have a piece, and hopefully the investigators got that piece.”