Justice Kavanaugh calls Trump tariff ruling ‘illogical’ in dissent | Fox News

Fox News Media
Fox News Media
Fox Business
Fox Nation
Fox News Audio
Fox Weather
Outkick
Fox Noticias
Books

Fox News
U.S.
Blue City Crime
Campus Radicals
Border Crisis
True Crime

Politics
Donald Trump
Senate
House
Judiciary
Foreign Policy
Fox News Polls
2025 Elections Coverage

World
U.N.
Conflicts
Terrorism
Disasters
Global Economy
Environment
Religion
Scandals

Opinion
Media
Fox Nation Coverage

Entertainment
Former Prince Andrew
Sydney Sweeney
Royal Families
Country Music

Sports
NFL
College Football
MLB
NASCAR
INDYCAR
NBA
NHL
Golf
Tennis
FIFA WORLD CUP 26
UFC
WWE

Lifestyle
Travel
Food & Drink
Faith
Discovery
Games & Quizzes

Health
Weight Loss
Cancer
Brain Health
Sleep
Heart Health
Healthy Living
Mental Health
MAHA

Video
AI
More

Expand / Collapse search
Log In
Watch TV
Menu
Games

Expand/Collapse Menu
Scattergories Daily
5 Across the Letter Word Game
DownWords
Sudoku
Swap Words
Word Search
Icon Match
Daily Crossword Puzzle
Mini Crossword Puzzle

Deals

Expand/Collapse Menu
Trending Deals
Gift Guides
Home Deals
Kitchen Deals
Tech and Electronic Deals
Health and Fitness Deals
Beauty and Fashion Deals

FOX Business

Expand/Collapse Menu
Economy
Personal Finance
Markets
Watchlist
Lifestyle
Real Estate
Tech

Science & Tech

Expand/Collapse Menu
Air & Space
Security
Innovation
Video Games
Military Tech
Planet Earth
Wild Nature

Watch Live

Expand/Collapse Menu
FOX News Shows
Programming Schedule
On Air Personalities
Full Episodes
Show Clips
News Clips

Apps & Products

Expand/Collapse Menu
FOX News Go
FOX Weather
FOX Nation
FOX Noticias
FOX News Shop
FOX News Radio
Outkick
FOX News Newsletters
FOX News Podcasts
FOX One

Games

Expand/Collapse Menu
Scattergories Daily
5 Across the Letter Word Game
DownWords
Sudoku
Swap Words
Word Search
Icon Match
Daily Crossword Puzzle
Mini Crossword Puzzle

Deals

Expand/Collapse Menu
Trending Deals
Gift Guides
Home Deals
Kitchen Deals
Tech and Electronic Deals
Health and Fitness Deals
Beauty and Fashion Deals

FOX Business

Expand/Collapse Menu
Economy
Personal Finance
Markets
Watchlist
Lifestyle
Real Estate
Tech

Science & Tech

Expand/Collapse Menu
Air & Space
Security
Innovation
Video Games
Military Tech
Planet Earth
Wild Nature

Watch Live

Expand/Collapse Menu
FOX News Shows
Programming Schedule
On Air Personalities
Full Episodes
Show Clips
News Clips

Apps & Products

Expand/Collapse Menu
FOX News Go
FOX Weather
FOX Nation
FOX Noticias
FOX News Shop
FOX News Radio
Outkick
FOX News Newsletters
FOX News Podcasts
FOX One

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
RSS
Newsletters

Fox News
Terms of Use
New Privacy Policy
Your Privacy Choices
Closed Caption Policy
Help
Contact Us
Accessibility Statement
News Sitemap
Video Sitemap

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2026 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions. Legal Statement. Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by LSEG.

Recommended Videos

Recommended Articles

Left Arrow
‘Impossible to describe:’ Importer who challenged Trump tariffs hails Supreme Court win
US to unveil platform aiming to bypass internet censorship in China, Iran and beyond
RFK Jr defends Trump move to protect pesticide he tied to ‘chronic disease epidemic’
Omar calls GOP probe into husband’s $30M business surge a ‘political stunt’ as records deadline passes
Fox News Poll: Trump’s tariffs faced broad disapproval even before Supreme Court ruling
Anna Murdoch-Mann, author and philanthropist, dead at 81
Trump announces 10% global tariff, criticizes Supreme Court justices
Trump gives grudging praise to liberal trio who helped sink his tariffs
Democrats cheer Supreme Court move blocking Trump tariffs — despite past support for trade duties
Supreme Court kills Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs — but 4 other laws could resurrect them
‘Tariffs suck’: Some Republicans privately celebrate as Supreme Court blocks Trump policy
‘Zero percent chance’: Energy Sec. Wright unloads on European climate alarmists in fiery Paris speech
Republicans shred ‘nonsense’ Dem claims against Trump-backed voter ID bill
Trump’s tariff revenues hit record highs as Supreme Court deals major blow
Trump says he is ‘considering’ a limited military strike to pressure Iran into nuclear deal
Supreme Court blocks Trump tariffs in major test of executive branch powers
Democratic-socialist nominee eyeing NJ governor’s vacant House seat compares ICE to 1960s segregationists
The only map you need to see to understand how serious Trump is about Iran
A third of GOP voters warn they may sit out midterms if party ‘abandons’ pro-life fight, poll finds
DHS says 8% of Nicaragua’s entire population illegally entered US under Biden

Right Arrow

Left Arrow
The Rise of Socialism: NYC housing faces reckoning as Mamdani enacts his agenda
Gutfeld: Here’s what the media won’t tell you about SCOTUS’ ruling against tariffs
SCOTUS tariff ruling: Treasury Secretary Bessent laments ‘loss’ for American people
Trump blasts ‘defective’ Supreme Court tariff ruling, plans 10% global tariff
President Trump says admin has ‘alternatives’ after Supreme Court ruling on tariffs
President Trump on tariff ruling: I am ‘ashamed’ of certain members of the court
WATCH: Top 5 wildest moments from presidential addresses to Congress over the years
Trump gives grudging praise to liberal trio who helped sink his tariffs
Iran’s malign activity must end, State Dept. spokesperson warns
Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs 6-3
Trump says Obama’s alien comment was ‘classified information’
Trump tariff blow may be ‘blessing in disguise,’ legal expert says
Trump says he’s ‘considering’ limited strike to pressure Iran into nuclear deal
Drone footage captures construction of Obama Presidential Center in Chicago
Supreme Court rules against Trump’s global tariffs
Mamdani threatens 9.5% property tax increase to fill NYC budget gap
Trump slams investigators for revealing technology used in Nancy Guthrie search
New Jersey Republican urges residents to oppose new immigration bills
Rebecca Grant on potential Iran military strikes and ‘Board of Peace’ plan for Gaza
Ex-Victoria’s Secret CEO testifies on links to Epstein

Right Arrow

Supreme Court
Kavanaugh rips Supreme Court majority’s ‘illogical’ line on tariffs
===================================================================

Conservative justice offers Trump alternative pathways for tariffs after 6-3 majority struck down emergency powers approach

---

By Ashley Oliver
Fox News

Published February 20, 2026 6:10pm EST

Facebook
Twitter
Threads
Flipboard
Comments
Print
Email
Add Fox News on Google

Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs 6-3

Fox News legal editor Kerri Urbahn and ‘The Fixer’ host Marcus Lemonis join ‘The Faulkner Focus’ to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision to rule against President Donald Trump’s global tariffs.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

5 min

Justice Brett Kavanaugh called the Supreme Court’s decision striking down Trump’s emergency tariffs

Trump lashes out at his own Supreme Court picks over tariff ruling: “An embarrassment to their families”

February 20, 2026 / 5:29 PM EST / CBS News

Washington — Hours after the Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, the president directed his ire at the six justices who ruled against him — including a pair of conservative jurists who were nominated to the bench by Mr. Trump.

Mr. Trump told reporters he’s “ashamed of certain members of the court.” He criticized the three liberal members, calling them an “automatic no,” but appeared especially frustrated with the three conservatives who concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, doesn’t give the president the power to unilaterally impose tariffs.

“You can’t knock their loyalty,” Mr. Trump said of the liberal justices. “That’s one thing you can do with some of our people.”

The three conservatives who ruled against the administration’s tariff strategy were George W. Bush-appointed Chief Justice John Roberts, and two justices who were appointed in Mr. Trump’s first term: Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett.

Asked if he regrets nominating Gorsuch and Barrett, Mr. Trump declined to answer, but called the decision “an embarrassment to their families.”

He also alleged — without evidence — that the court has been “swayed by foreign interests,” and said the justices in the majority were “fools and lap dogs for the RINOs and the radical left Democrats.” RINOs is short for “Republicans in name only.”

Mr. Trump heaped praise on his third nominee to the court, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who penned the principal dissenting opinion, arguing that the president’s power under IEEPA encompasses tariffs. Kavanaugh also laid out a menu of other laws that could be invoked to potentially justify levies, some of which the president indicated he would use. Mr. Trump called him a “genius” and said his stock is on the rise.

The ruling could make for a strange dynamic during Mr. Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday, which some Supreme Court justices usually attend. The president told reporters Friday the justices are still invited, but the six who ruled against him are “barely invited,” while the three dissenting justices are “happily invited.”

“I couldn’t care less if they come,” Mr. Trump said.

A spokesperson for the Supreme Court did not immediately return a request for comment.

Prior presidents have criticized the Supreme Court for decisions they disagree with, though not as sharply as Mr. Trump did Friday or through personal attacks. After the high court in June 2023 struck down former President Joe Biden’s plan to forgive $400 billion in student-loan debt, Biden called the decision “a mistake” and “wrong,” and said the majority “misinterpreted the Constitution.”

Then, after the Supreme Court ruled in July 2024 that presidents have immunity from federal prosecution for official actions taken while in office, Biden said the decision was a “terrible disservice to the people of this nation” and a continuation of what he said was the court’s attack “on a wide range of long-established principles.”

During his State of the Union address in 2010, then-President Barack Obama criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark campaign finance case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, warning it would “open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit” in federal elections.

Justice Samuel Alito, sitting alongside his Supreme Court colleagues, shook his head and appeared to mouth “not true” in response to Obama’s comments. He has not attended a State of the Union since.

Mr. Trump has criticized the Supreme Court in the past for ruling against him. After the court declined to take a longshot lawsuit from the state of Texas to halt the certification of his 2020 election loss, the president said the court “really let us down. No Wisdom, No Courage!”

And in a 2023 speech, while Mr. Trump was out of office, he called his nominees “outstanding people” and “great scholars” who have “done a great job” — “except for me,” he joked.

“They don’t help me much, I’ve got to tell you that,” the president said. “They vote against me too much, but one of those little things in life, right?”

Mr. Trump’s three appointments to the Supreme Court shifted the court to the right. In the years since Barrett was confirmed to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020, which expanded its conservative majority to 6-3, the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, which established the constitutional right to abortion, ended affirmative action in higher education and curtailed the regulatory power of federal agencies.

The court’s conservative majority also expanded gun rights in 2022, recognizing for the first time that the Second Amendment protects the right to carry a firearm in public.

One influential adviser who helped Mr. Trump shape the judiciary in his first term was Leonard Leo, a former Federalist Society leader who advised the president on Supreme Court picks.

Since then, Mr. Trump has had a falling-out with the powerful legal activist. After an appellate court ruled against his tariffs last year, Mr. Trump publicly blamed Leo, whom he called a “sleazebag” and a “bad person” who “probably hates America.”

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-says-he-absolutely-ashamed-supreme-court-justices-who-ruled-against-his-tariffs/

Andrew Yang on tariff ruling: ‘People should be furious at this mismanagement of the economy on the part of the president.’ | CNN Politics

By Blake McGill, CNN

Published 4:19 PM EST, Fri February 20, 2026

Video Ad Feedback

Andrew Yang on tariff ruling: ‘People should be furious at this mismanagement of the economy on the part of the president.’

Andrew Yang joins CNN’s Boris Sanchez to react to the Supreme Court ruling that President Donald Trump violated federal law when he unilaterally imposed sweeping tariffs across the globe. Yang also offered his predictions on the future of AI.

6:35 • Source: CNN

Politics of the Day 10 videos

Video Ad Feedback

Andrew Yang on tariff ruling: ‘People should be furious at this mismanagement of the economy on the part of the president.’

6:35

Now playing

• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Supreme Court rules that Trump’s sweeping emergency tariffs are illegal

4:47

Now playing

• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Homan pressed on Minneapolis immigration operations

10:10

Now playing

• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

President Trump extends his timeline for Iran negotiations to 10-15 days

3:20

Now playing

• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Trump speaks about his Iran decision at first Board of Peace meeting

3:31

Now playing

• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

The Odds: Colbert doubles down in public fight with CBS

4:00

Now playing

• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Tracking the US military buildup near Iran

2:03

Now playing

• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Colbert says CBS scrapped interview after Trump FCC’s threats

4:24

Now playing

• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Hillary Clinton accuses Trump administration of ‘cover-up’ over Epstein files

0:45

Now playing

• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Why some of DOJ’s unredacted Epstein files are still hidden for lawmakers

1:13

Now playing

• Source: CNN

See more videos

Ad Feedback

Supreme Court has taken away Trump’s leverage with tariff ruling, says Bessent

By Reuters

February 20, 2026 9:27 PM UTC Updated 2 hours ago

Feb 20 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court has taken away President Donald Trump’s leverage with its decision to strike down tariffs imposed under a law meant for use in national emergencies, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday.

“The Supreme Court has taken away the President’s leverage, but in a way, they have made the leverage that he has more draconian because they agreed he does have the right to a full embargo,” Bessent told “The Will Cain Show” on Fox News.

The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

“We will get back to the same tariff level for the countries. It will just be in a less direct and slightly more convoluted manner,” he said.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent gives a statement during the 56th annual World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting, at the USA House venue, in Davos, Switzerland, January 19, 2026. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/ File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

Trump reacted to the court’s ruling on Friday by saying he would invoke other laws to collect tariffs, and announced a blanket 10% tariff on imports from all other countries.

Bessent said he believed every country was going to honor the trade agreements made with the Trump administration over the last year.

“He (Trump) has a right to a complete embargo, he can just cut countries off … or he can cut whole product lines off. We can’t receive any money. So, I would call on all countries to honor their agreements and move forward,” Bessent added.

Reporting by Bhargav Acharya and Ismail Shakil; Editing by David Ljunggren

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

关税政策被判违宪 特朗普誓言加征10%全球进口关税

发布时间 / 来源：2026年2月21日 06:53 / 联合早报

美国总统特朗普对最高法院裁定他援引《国际紧急经济权力法》向全球征收关税违反宪法勃然大怒，他称一些大法官令他感到可耻，并宣布他将签署行政令，对全球商品加征10%的进口关税，以取代被最高法院认定违法的一些紧急关税。

路透社报道，美国最高法院星期五（2月20日）以6比3的投票结果，裁定美国《国际紧急经济权力法》（IEEPA）没有授权总统征收大规模关税，此举超越总统职权，已构成违宪。这项裁决不仅重创特朗普执政的核心经济武器，更可能引发高达1750亿美元（约2217亿新元）的税款退还潮。

特朗普当天下午在白宫的临时新闻发布会说：“我对最高法院的某些成员感到可耻，绝对可耻，因为他们没有勇气为我们国家做正确的事。”其中两名由特朗普提名的大法官戈萨奇和巴雷特，以及保守派的首席大法官罗伯茨加入三名自由派大法官，裁定特朗普动用紧急权力法对世界各国加征关税，超越总统职权。

他称这一裁决令一些国家欢喜若狂，甚至“在街上跳舞”，并指责最高法院受到外国势力影响，但未提供证据。

特朗普同时宣布，他将援引1974年《贸易法》第122条对美国贸易伙伴征收10%的全面关税。特朗普是第一位援引《贸易法》第122条的美国总统。

特朗普还说，他将研究动用其他权力征收新一轮关税。如果他的计划奏效，最高法院20日的裁决对市场的长期影响可能有限。

由首席大法官罗伯茨撰写的多数判决书指出，特朗普援引1977年《国际紧急经济权力法》加征关税是不合法的。罗伯茨指总统必须得到国会的明确授权才能行使加税权，宪法规定这项权力属于国会，而非白宫。

特朗普说：“他们非常不爱国，对我们的宪法不忠。我认为最高法院受到了外国利益集团和一个远比人们想象中小得多的政治运动影响。”

特朗普当天还在社交媒体发文，称美国所有以“国家安全”为由征收的关税，以及根据1962年《贸易扩展法》第232条和1974年《贸易法》第301条征收的关税将继续有效。

另外，特朗普在记者会上承认，最高法院裁决将引发一场旷日持久的法律缠斗，关于联邦政府是否必须向美国企业退还数以十亿美元计的关税税款，可能“要打五年官司”。

Will Americans get refunds after Trump’s tariffs were overturned by the Supreme Court?

2026-02-20T17:34:00-0500 / CBS News

Businesses are pressing the Trump administration to issue tariff refunds after the Supreme Court ruled Friday that President Trump unlawfully imposed levies under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. Yet that process faces potential legal and political roadblocks, with experts saying it could drag out for years.

Economists and trade experts told CBS News they expect the issue to be litigated in court, while no government mechanism is currently set up for businesses to file for or collect a tariff refund.

“We anticipate another long legal fight over those refunds,” Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist with Capital Economics, said in a note to investors.

Will Americans get tariff refunds after the Supreme Court ruling?

---

The Supreme Court did not indicate in its ruling whether businesses that paid billions of dollars in IEEPA tariffs must be reimbursed, effectively punting the question to lower courts.

In a press conference on Friday after the Supreme Court ruling, Mr. Trump demurred on whether his administration will issue refunds, but suggested the process is likely to be drawn out — possibly for years.

“They take months and months to write an opinion, and they don’t even discuss that point,” he said. “What happens to all the money we took in? It wasn’t discussed.”

“I guess it has to get litigated for the next two years,” he added.

The Penn Wharton Budget Model, a nonpartisan research initiative focused on public policy analysis, estimated Friday that businesses could be owed up to $165 billion in tariff refunds.

How would a tariff refund work?

---

Currently, no procedures are in place to automatically refund businesses for the IEEPA tariffs they paid; similarly, no portal exists that would enable businesses to apply for reimbursement.

Wayne Winegarden, a senior fellow in economics at Pacific Research Institute, a nonpartisan think tank that supports free-market principles, told CBS News that processing billions of dollars in tariff refunds would be an “unprecedented” move by the federal government.

“Certainly, the administration is not going to volunteer refunds, and companies will have to ask for them,” he said. “The bottom line is that the government didn’t have the authority to levy the tax, so they are entitled to refunds.”

Although Winegarden said businesses will likely have to jump through various hoops to claim a refund, he suspects some companies will opt against filing for compensation out of concern that it could anger Mr. Trump.

“It’s a complicated mess. For businesses, it’s a crapshoot, and he’s a punitive person, so that will keep them from asking,” Winegarden told CBS News.

Which tariffs would qualify for a tariff refund?

---

The Supreme Court struck down country-based tariffs imposed under IEEPA. Those levies account for roughly 60% of the U.S. tariff revenue collected each month, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model.

At a speech at the Economic Club of Dallas on Friday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested it is unclear if the federal government must provide tariff refunds to businesses, saying the issue is “in dispute.”

“The Supreme Court did not rule on that today — they pushed it back down to the International Tax and Trade Court. And you know, my sense is that could be dragged out for weeks, months, years,” he said.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has said it is working to replace the IEEPA tariffs through other powers.

“We can use other of the statutes, other of the tariff authorities, which have also been confirmed and are fully allowed,” Mr. Trump said Friday. To that end, he announced he would impose a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act.

The president also indicated that his administration would seek to expand other existing tariffs, such as levies imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act.

Who has called for tariff refunds?

---

Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collective, a progressive economic think tank, said that businesses have filed more than 1,000 claims for tariff refunds with the Court of International Trade. He expects that number to soar following Friday’s high court ruling.

Those cases “have been stayed since the Supreme Court decided they would take this on — now they will all go forward,” he said. “There will be a massive number of cases.”

Shawn Phetteplace, national campaigns director for Main Street Alliance, a small business advocacy group that opposes Mr. Trump’s tariffs, urged the White House to swiftly provide refunds.

“We are going to work really hard to get the money back, because it’s the kind of money that can make a business unsustainable,” he said, noting that some small business owners have closed permanently because of higher tariff costs.

“If tariffs are deemed illegal, then the money should be paid back, and you would hope they follow the law and the ruling,” Phetteplace added.

Following the Supreme Court decision, some state political leaders also called on Mr. Trump to issue refunds to U.S. consumers.

“Trump took hard-earned money from the pockets of working families and the American people. Time to pay up,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a posted on social media.

In a memo on Friday, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker also demanded that the Trump administration pay every household in the state $1,700 each — a total of $8 billion. That is the amount Democratic lawmakers on the Joint Economic Committee recently estimated that U.S. families have paid in tariff costs.

https://x.com/CAgovernor/status/2024950767992668165?s=20

Trump slams justices after Supreme Court strikes down most of his tariffs

February 20, 2026 at 3:44 p.m. EST / The Washington Post

President Donald Trump said Friday he would impose a new across-the-board tariff after the Supreme Court ruled most of his levies illegal. (Peter W. Stevenson/The Washington Post)

By Justin Jouvenal
,
David J. Lynch
and
Julian Mark

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down most of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs, a ruling that deals a major blow to his signature economic policy and represents a stinging political setback.

‘Embarrassment to their families’: Trump denounces Supreme Court justices after tariffs ruling

By John Kruzel

February 20, 2026 9:57 PM UTC Updated 40 mins ago

WASHINGTON, Feb 20 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump lashed out on Friday at the U.S. Supreme Court and the six justices who struck down his signature global tariffs – including two he appointed – in remarkably personal terms while hailing the three justices who backed him.

Although previous presidents have sharply criticized Supreme Court rulings against them, Trump’s lengthy tirade to reporters at the White House stood out for its contemptuous tone, as well as the personal nature of his scorn and praise.

The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

It represented a remarkable attack by a sitting president on the top U.S. judicial body, even after Trump and other senior officials in his administration over the past year have assailed lower-court judges for rulings impeding his policies since he returned to office in January 2025.

The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, had over the past year permitted Trump’s expansive assertion of executive power, with few exceptions, in a series of decisions issued on an emergency basis.

But Friday’s ruling delivered Trump a stinging defeat. It was authored by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by two fellow conservatives who Trump appointed during his first term in office – Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett – as well as the three liberal justices.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

特朗普拟于3月31日至4月2日访华 | 联合早报

发布/2026年2月21日 07:10

特朗普拟于3月31日至4月2日访华

2025年10月30日，特朗普和习近平在韩国釜山出席亚太经合峰会期间会晤。 （路透社）

美国总统特朗普计划在3月31日至4月2日访问中国，与国家主席习近平举行会晤。

彭博社报道，特朗普星期四（2月19日）在华盛顿举行的和平委员会第一次会议上说，他将在4月访问中国。

美国最高法院2月20日裁定特朗普援引《国际紧急经济权力法》向全球征收关税违反宪法，势必会打乱中美两国为延长去年达成的贸易休战协议所做努力。

特朗普和习近平预计将寻求解决再次陷入不确定性的贸易关系，并缓和围绕台湾问题的紧张局势。

特朗普此前表示期待习近平在今年晚些时候访问华盛顿，预计习近平将出席在佛罗里达州举行的二十国集团（G20）会议。

‘The Constitution was defended today’: GOP Congressman reacts to Supreme Court tariff ruling | CNN Politics

By Margaret Given, CNN
Published 3:55 PM EST, Fri February 20, 2026

Video Ad Feedback

‘The Constitution was defended today’: GOP Congressman reacts to Supreme Court tariff ruling

Link Copied!

CNN’s Brianna Keilar gets Republican Congressman Don Bacon’s reaction to the Supreme Court’s ruling that President Donald Trump violated federal law when he unilaterally imposed sweeping tariffs across the globe. Bacon says if President Trump moves ahead with his newly invoked alternative 10% global tariffs, “that will be brought up for a vote in Congress, and it will be defeated.”

7:44 • Source: CNN

Politics of the Day 10 videos

Video Ad Feedback

‘The Constitution was defended today’: GOP Congressman reacts to Supreme Court tariff ruling

7:44

Now playing
• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Supreme Court rules that Trump’s sweeping emergency tariffs are illegal

4:47

Now playing
• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Homan pressed on Minneapolis immigration operations

10:10

Now playing
• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

President Trump extends his timeline for Iran negotiations to 10-15 days

3:20

Now playing
• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Trump speaks about his Iran decision at first Board of Peace meeting

3:31

Now playing
• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

The Odds: Colbert doubles down in public fight with CBS

4:00

Now playing
• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Tracking the US military buildup near Iran

2:03

Now playing
• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Colbert says CBS scrapped interview after Trump FCC’s threats

4:24

Now playing
• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Hillary Clinton accuses Trump administration of ‘cover-up’ over Epstein files

0:45

Now playing
• Source: CNN

Video Ad Feedback

Why some of DOJ’s unredacted Epstein files are still hidden for lawmakers

1:13

Now playing
• Source: CNN

See more videos

Ad Feedback