2026年6月17日 下午6:11 美东时间 / 福克斯新闻
参议员马克·凯利称，据报道的14点协议给予伊朗“几乎所有”其想要的东西
作者：查尔斯·克雷茨，福克斯新闻
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章！
副总统JD·万斯驳斥了将正在推进的特朗普-万斯伊朗协议与周三公布的该协议过于相似于巴拉克·奥巴马总统核协议的说法进行比较的观点。
批评人士指出，万斯为重启霍尔木兹海峡的谅解备忘录进行辩护——该备忘录的细节已由政府公布——根据该协议，伊朗只有在遵守核限制措施后才能获得经济利益。他们认为，这种动态与奥巴马推动2015年《联合全面行动计划》（JCPOA）的方式如出一辙，而特朗普和万斯长期以来一直抨击该计划。
然而，万斯向福克斯新闻表示，这种比较源于一种误解，因为奥巴马协议中众所周知的胡萝卜加大棒策略已经被逆转。
“伊朗的宣传人员在说，‘我们得到了所有这些东西’，但他们忽略了一个事实，那就是他们只有从根本上改变自己的国家，才能得到这些东西，”他说，并补充道，如果伊朗遵守协议，该协议将为德黑兰在整个中东地区开展经济合作打开大门。
万斯在前往巴基斯坦参加高风险伊朗谈判之际，“脆弱”停火悬而未决
2025年6月21日，唐纳德·特朗普总统在华盛顿特区白宫 Situation Room 会见副总统J·D·万斯。（白宫/路透社）
“无论如何，美国都是赢家。正如总统所说，要么他们一无所获，我们摧毁他们的核计划，霍尔木兹海峡保持开放；要么他们从根本上改变自己。这也是一个重大转变。这完全取决于他们，”他在《五点档》节目中说道。
主持人杰西·沃特斯同意该协议与奥巴马和前参议员约翰·克里（马萨诸塞州民主党人）十年前达成的协议“完全相反”。
万斯宣扬摧毁伊朗核计划，特朗普宣布以伊停火
“如果他们资助代理人，他们就不会获得经济利益，而导弹问题也得到了覆盖，因为他们85%的导弹已经被摧毁，90%的工业基地已经被摧毁。”
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398504556112
“他们已经被解除武装。他们无法重新武装，因为他们可以制造更多武器，而且现在他们真的无法在境外投射力量，因为他们没有空军和海军，不再对美国构成迫在眉睫的威胁，”沃特斯说道，他进一步辩称伊朗无法浓缩铀，因为唯一能够回收铀“粉尘”的力量是美国。
在2015年7月为捍卫《联合全面行动计划》发表的一份声明中，奥巴马使用了如今特朗普政府官员正在使用的类似措辞。
“[W]e give nothing up by testing whether or not this problem can be solved peacefully. If, in a worst-case scenario, Iran violates the deal, the same options that are available to me today will be available to any U.S. president in the future. And I have no doubt that 10 or 15 years from now, the person who holds this office will be in a far stronger position,” 一份白宫声明写道。
奥巴马还辩称，如果伊朗多年后违反协议，未来的总统将“处于更有利的地位”，因为检查和透明度措施将允许美国监控德黑兰的核储备。
然而，万斯指出，在特朗普政府数月前下令发动袭击后，伊朗已经没有多少这样的核储备了。
与本届政府一样，奥巴马也曾试图平息批评，他在2015年8月的一次演讲中警告称，广告会铺天盖地而来，“伴随的评论”会试图破坏该协议。
“伊朗有强大的动机遵守其承诺，”他说，这句话与万斯在福克斯新闻采访中提出的论点如出一辙。
“在获得制裁豁免之前，伊朗必须采取重大、具体的步骤，比如移除离心机并销毁其核储备。如果伊朗在未来十年内违反协议，所有制裁都可以重新恢复，”奥巴马说道。
“另一方面，如果伊朗遵守协议，其经济开始与世界重新融合，避免制裁恢复的动机只会增强，”奥巴马的另一句话呼应了如今政府官员提出的论点。
然而，截至周三，一些批评人士仍持怀疑态度，指出特朗普多年来一直在抨击《联合全面行动计划》，称该协议以不足的让步换取了经济救济。
特朗普再次称协议即将达成，随后证实与伊朗达成最后一刻协议，但细节仍保密
亚利桑那州民主党参议员马克·凯利是特朗普的批评者，也是前宇航员，他认为该协议看起来像是特朗普候选人时期会抨击的对象。
“我确实阅读了有关该协议14点内容的报道，我得说，我的意思是，如果这是奥巴马总统或拜登总统提出的，我不认为唐纳德·特朗普会太支持它，对吗？”凯利说道。
“我的意思是，它给予了一切：这基本上就是伊朗想要的所有东西，”他警告道。
伊朗政权批评者警告特朗普协议可能成为政权的“救命稻草”，称民众“感到不安”
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6396144979112
伊朗安全专家贝赫南·本·塔莱布卢周三在接受福克斯新闻数字频道独家采访时表示，不过，一些人会对特朗普-万斯协议持谨慎态度。
“政府非常强调这不会动用美国资金，无论是在重建方面，还是该政权日后通过石油销售创收的能力。但令人担忧的是，与伊斯兰共和国达成的任何协议都是与魔鬼做交易，”塔莱布卢说道，他领导着华盛顿无党派国家安全和外交政策研究机构防卫民主基金会的伊朗项目。
“特朗普2018年退出伊朗协议，不是因为伊朗违反了协议，而是因为美国得到的回报不值得美国付出的代价——也就是说，美国从伊朗那里得到的核让步不值得美国给予的制裁豁免，”塔莱布卢说道。
第四轮美伊谈判结束，特朗普即将开启历史性中东之行
一张三幅拼接图片，从左到右分别为：2026年6月17日，美国副总统JD·万斯在纽约贝思佩奇发表讲话；2015年7月14日，巴拉克·奥巴马总统与副总统乔·拜登在华盛顿特区的新闻发布会上；2026年6月15日，美国总统唐纳德·特朗普抵达法国埃维昂莱班参加G7领导人峰会。（斯宾塞·普拉特、安德鲁·哈尼克、伊莎贝尔·因方特斯/盖蒂图片社）
据塔莱布卢称，政府要想在叙事上取得“胜利”，最好的办法是 fully release the text of the deal to present a true comparison with both the JCPOA and the less-remembered 2013 JPA, which was also forged by Obama.
塔莱布卢表示，《联合行动计划》是与特朗普协议报道的更好对比对象。该协议范围更小，为奥巴马和克里谈判达成更大的2015年协议奠定了基础。塔莱布卢说，在当前的协议中，有一个类似的60天窗口供伊朗遵守协议。
“他们必须证明他们得到的比他们付出的更有价值。根据彭博社、CNN和阿拉伯半岛电视台泄露的待协议内容，情况看起来并不乐观，”他说道。
政府面临的另一个阻力是美国公众对经济影响的容忍度有限，比如汽油和大宗商品价格上涨，或者纳斯达克偶尔出现的下跌。
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398679512112
“这不仅是政治问题，也是文化和社会问题，这意味着政府需要更好地向公众解释，”他说道。
塔莱布卢表示，伊朗自1979年以来一直在与美国交战，需要更有效地开展“政治宣传”，让公众接受这一事实。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
他还警告称，虽然与伊朗开战的影响可能会让美国民众不堪重负，但与更复杂的对手中国未来发生冲突带来的经济后果将远超这些影响。
谅解备忘录列出了伊朗石油出口的立即豁免，以及3000亿美元经济发展的框架。
不过，一名官员向福克斯新闻数字频道强调，在60天窗口后达成最终协议之前，德黑兰将获得的主要福利只有石油豁免。
在一次记者电话会议上，官员们强调，如果发现伊朗“只是在拖延我们，糊弄我们”，谈判将立即终止，他们仍对伊朗的意图持怀疑态度。
福克斯新闻数字频道已联系副总统办公室寻求进一步评论。
福克斯新闻数字频道的摩根·菲利普斯为本报告做出了贡献。
查尔斯·克雷茨是福克斯新闻数字频道的记者。
他于2013年加入福克斯新闻，担任撰稿人和制作助理。
查尔斯负责报道福克斯新闻数字频道的媒体、政治和文化领域。
查尔斯是宾夕法尼亚州本地人，毕业于天普大学，获得广播新闻学学士学位。新闻线索可发送至charles.creitz@fox.com。
Vance rejects claims Trump-Iran deal echoes Obama-era logic as hawks raise alarm
2026-06-17 6:11pm EDT / Fox News
Sen Mark Kelly says the reported 14-point agreement gives Iran ‘basically everything’ it would want
By Charles Creitz, Fox News
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Vice President JD Vance is pushing back on comparisons between the emerging Trump-Vance Iran pact and claims that the agreement, released Wednesday, bears too much resemblance to President Barack Obama’s nuclear deal.
Critics pointed to Vance’s defense of the memorandum of understanding to reopen the Strait of Hormuz — the details of which were released by the administration — under which Iran would receive economic benefits only after complying with nuclear restrictions. They argue that dynamic mirrors how Obama promoted the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, which Trump and Vance have long reviled.
Vance, however, suggested to Fox News that the comparison stems from a misconception because the proverbial carrot-and-stick positions from the Obama deal have been reversed.
“You’ve got Iranian propagandists out there saying, well, ‘we get all these things’, and they leave out the fact that they only get those things if they fundamentally transform themselves as a country,” he said, adding that the deal could open the door to economic cooperation for Tehran throughout the Mideast if it complies.
VANCE EN ROUTE TO PAKISTAN FOR HIGH-STAKES IRAN TALKS AS ‘FRAGILE’ CEASEFIRE TEETERS
President Donald Trump meets with Vice President J.D. Vance in the Situation Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 21, 2025.(The White House/Reuters)
“So the United States wins either way. As the president said, either they get nothing, we destroy their nuclear program and the Strait of Hormuz is open, or they fundamentally transformed themselves. And that’s a big one too. It’s really up to them,” he said on “The Five.”
Host Jesse Watters agreed that the deal is the “exact opposite” of what Obama and former Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., forged a decade ago.
VANCE TOUTS DESTRUCTION OF IRANIAN NUCLEAR PROGRAM AS TRUMP ANNOUNCES ISRAEL-IRAN CEASEFIRE
“If they fund the proxies they don’t get the economic benefits, and the missiles are covered because 85% of them have been destroyed and 90% of their industrial base has been destroyed.”
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398504556112
“They’ve been disarmed. They can’t re-arm because they can manufacture more weapons and now they can really project power outside of their borders because they have no Air Force and they have no Navy and they don’t pose an imminent threat to the United States anymore,” Watters said, further arguing that the Iranians cannot enrich uranium because the only force capable of recovering the uranium “dust” is the U.S.
In a July 2015 statement defending the JCPOA, Obama used language similar to that now being used by Trump administration officials.
“[W]e give nothing up by testing whether or not this problem can be solved peacefully. If, in a worst-case scenario, Iran violates the deal, the same options that are available to me today will be available to any U.S. president in the future. And I have no doubt that 10 or 15 years from now, the person who holds this office will be in a far stronger position,” a White House statement read.
Obama also argued a future president would be “in a far stronger position” if Iran violated the agreement years later because inspections and transparency measures would allow the U.S. to monitor Tehran’s nuclear stockpiles.
Vance, however, noted there are few such stockpiles left after the Trump administration ordered strikes months ago.
Like the current administration, Obama sought to blunt criticism, warning in an August 2015 speech that ads will run and “accompanying commentary” will try to undermine the deal.
“Iran has powerful incentives to keep its commitments,” he said in a line similar to arguments Vance has made in Fox News interviews.
“Before getting sanctions relief, Iran has to take significant, concrete steps like removing centrifuges and getting rid of its stockpiles. If Iran violates the agreement over the next decade, all of the sanctions can snap back into place,” Obama said.
“On the other hand, if Iran abides by the deal and its economy begins to reintegrate with the world, the incentive to avoid snapback will only grow,” Obama said in another line that echoed arguments now being made by administration officials.
Some critics, however, remained skeptical as of Wednesday, noting that Trump spent years attacking the JCPOA, arguing it provided economic relief in exchange for insufficient concessions.
TRUMP AGAIN SAYS DEAL IS CLOSE, THEN CONFIRMS A LAST-MINUTE AGREEMENT WITH IRAN, BUT DETAILS STILL SECRET
Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., a Trump critic and former astronaut, suggested the deal resembled something candidate Trump would have lambasted.
“I did read what was reported on those 14 points of the agreement and I got to say, I mean, if this was something that President Obama or Biden had put forward, I don’t think Donald Trump would have been too supportive of it, right?” Kelly said.
“I mean, it gives everything: It’s basically everything that the Iranians would want,” he warned.
IRANIAN REGIME CRITIC WARNS TRUMP DEAL COULD BE ‘LIFELINE’ FOR REGIME, CLAIMS PEOPLE ARE ‘NERVOUS’
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6396144979112
Iranian security expert Behnam Ben Taleblu told Fox News Digital in an exclusive interview Wednesday that some, however, will take pause at the Trump-Vance deal
“The administration is focusing very much on this not being American money, whether one is looking at the reconstruction or the ability of the regime to later on generate revenue through oil sales. But worryingly, any deal with the Islamic Republic is a deal with the devil,” said Taleblu, who leads the Iran program at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies — a nonpartisan national security and foreign policy research institute in Washington.
“When Trump left the Iran deal in 2018, he didn’t leave it because of violation, he left it because that which the U.S. got was not worth that which the U.S. gave — meaning the nuclear concessions the U.S. got was not worth the sanctions relief the U.S. gave,” Taleblu said.
4TH ROUND OF US-IRAN TALKS ENDS AS TRUMP SET TO EMBARK ON HISTORIC MIDDLE EAST TOUR
A three-way split image shows, from left to right, U.S. Vice President JD Vance delivering remarks in Bethpage, New York, on June 17, 2026; President Barack Obama standing with Vice President Joe Biden during a press conference in Washington, DC, on July 14, 2015; and U.S. President Donald Trump arriving for the G7 Leaders’ Summit in Evian-les-Bains, France, on June 15, 2026.(Spencer Platt, Andrew Harnik, Isabel Infantes / Getty Images)
The best way for the administration to secure a narrative “win,” according to Taleblu, would be to fully release the text of the deal to present a true comparison with both the JCPOA and the less-remembered 2013 JPA, which was also forged by Obama.
Taleblu said the JPA is a better comparison to reports about the Trump deal. That pact was smaller in scope and set the stage for Obama and Kerry to negotiate the larger 2015 deal. In the current deal, Taleblu said, there is a similar 60-day window for Iran to comply.
“They have to show that that which they got is worth more than that which they gave. And based on leaks of the pending deal in Bloomberg and CNN and Al-Arabiya, it’s not looking good,” he said.
Another headwind facing the administration is the American public’s limited tolerance for economic repercussions, such as rising gas and commodity prices or occasional downturns in the Nasdaq.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398679512112
“This is not just political it’s cultural and social which means the administration has to do a better job bringing the public along,” he said.
Taleblu said Iran has been warring with the U.S. since 1979 and that there needs to be more effective “political communications” about that fact to secure public buy-in.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
He also warned that while the effects of a war with Iran on the U.S. may strain the public, they would be dwarfed by the economic fallout from a future conflict with a more complicated adversary: China.
The memorandum of understanding lays out immediate waivers for Iranian oil exports, as well as a framework for $300 billion in economic development.
An official, however, emphasized to Fox News Digital that oil waivers were the only major benefit Tehran would realize before any final agreement is reached after a 60-day window.
In a reporter call, officials underlined that negotiations would promptly end if it was discovered Iran was “just dragging us along and kind of bull——- us,” and that they remained skeptical of Iran’s intentions.
Fox News Digital reached out to the vice president’s office for additional comment.
Fox News Digital’s Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.
Charles Creitz is a reporter for Fox News Digital.
He joined Fox News in 2013 as a writer and production assistant.
Charles covers media, politics and culture for Fox News Digital.
Charles is a Pennsylvania native and graduated from Temple University with a B.A. in Broadcast Journalism. Story tips can be sent to charles.creitz@fox.com.