分类: 未分类

  • 2025年美国新药价格下跌,因上市的昂贵基因疗法数量减少


    2026-06-25 10:02:24 / 路透社

    6月25日(路透社)——一项新分析显示,2025年经美国监管机构批准的处方药上市价格较上年有所下降,但由于罕见病高价药物的存在,中位价格仍高达21.6万美元。

    2024年新药的年度挂牌价中位值超过37万美元,高于2023年的30万美元和2022年的22.2万美元。

    订阅路透社健康周刊,及时了解最新医学突破与医疗保健趋势。点击此处注册

    药品定价专家将此次价格回落归因于获批药物类型的结构变化,而非定价策略或政府降低处方药价格政策的重大调整。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)去年批准了5款细胞和基因疗法,而2024年和2023年获批数量均为7款。一次性使用的基因疗法定价可达数百万美元。

    美国制药研究与制造商协会(PhRMA)在一封电子邮件中表示,许多新药针对的是几乎没有或根本没有治疗选择的严重复杂疾病,将这类药物的价格与其他类型药物进行比较是“具有误导性的”。

    2025年FDA批准的药物中,超过67%为小分子药物(即通过化学合成的药片等),而非成本高昂、结构复杂的活细胞衍生生物制剂。这一比例高于2024年的62%和2023年的57%。

    布鲁金斯学会卫生政策中心主任理查德·弗兰克表示,新型生物制剂往往是首创药物,没有竞争对手,因此制药商可以收取高价。

    2025年获批药物的平均上市价格为41.6万美元,其中低成本药物拉低了整体均价:比如LENZ Therapeutics用于治疗视力模糊的眼部滴眼液Vizz售价1050美元,LIB Therapeutics的降胆固醇药物Lerochol售价5400美元;而Mighty Therapeutics用于治疗巴尔特综合征的罕见遗传病药物Forzinity年定价近80万美元,这类高价治疗拉抬了整体均价。

    政治因素发挥作用

    哈佛大学医学院研究药物价格的助理教授本杰明·罗姆博士表示:“很难仅凭单一年份就对趋势做出太多评估”,并补充称“2025年是不同寻常的一年”。

    他指出,FDA曾受到特朗普政府机构重组的冲击,包括人员裁减和领导层更迭。该机构驳回了多款基因疗法,引发了患者维权人士的反对和政治争议。今年早些时候,FDA表示将采取更灵活的监管方式。

    制药商面临着来自唐纳德·特朗普总统的压力。特朗普曾试图通过特朗普Rx直销平台以及与大型企业达成协议,使美国药品价格与其他发达国家看齐,以此宣称自己在解决美国高药价问题上取得了胜利。

    布鲁金斯学会的弗兰克表示,这些协议不太可能在本届政府任期结束后继续生效。

    罗姆还表示,如果没有相关立法,这些协议不会对定价决策产生重大影响。

    南加州大学舍费尔卫生政策与经济中心主任杰弗里·乔伊斯称,目前存在一种普遍现象:“大家都在标榜自己在降低药价方面做了多少工作”,但其中很多都是“表面功夫”。

    针对癌症和罕见病的新药

    FDA去年批准了51款新药,其中46款来自其主要审批部门,另有5款为细胞和基因疗法。该机构2024年批准了57款新药,2023年为55款。上述统计不包括造影剂、血液检测试剂或疫苗。

    3 Axis Advisors对42种药品价格的分析还排除了间歇性使用的药物(如抗生素)和尚未商业化上市的产品。

    抗癌药物仍是最主要的治疗领域,约占2025年FDA获批药物的三分之一。

    与近年情况一致,超过一半的获批药物为“孤儿药”,即用于治疗美国患者人数少于20万的疾病。制药商可获得罕见病研究投资激励,包括更长的市场独占期,且通常会为这类小众产品收取溢价。

    南加州大学的乔伊斯在称这一政策“明智”的同时,也指出制药商“钻了这些激励政策的空子”。

    他说:“他们可以开发一种对多种疾病都有效的药物,但只为其申请针对‘低患病率疾病’的审批,从而获得所有政策红利和税收减免。其逻辑就是以你认为能承受的最高价格上市(定价)。”

    制药企业强调,新药能够带来成本节约价值,包括可能减少急诊室就诊和住院次数。

    该分析仅关注挂牌价格,未包括保险公司可从制造商处获得的未公开折扣和返利。

    “无论大多数新药是否比现有药物带来巨大益处,或是仅为未提供太多新价值的创新产品,你仍需为它们支付数十万美元,”哈佛大学的罗姆说道。

    本报记者迪娜·比斯利报道;编辑:卡罗琳·休默、比尔·伯克罗特

    我们的准则:汤森路透信任原则

    US prices for new drugs fell in 2025 as fewer costly gene therapies were launched

    2026-06-25 10:02:24 / Reuters

    June 25 (Reuters) – Launch prices for prescription medicines approved by U.S. regulators in 2025 fell from the previous year, but remained high at a ​median of $216,000 due to expensive drugs for rare diseases, a new analysis shows.

    In 2024, the median annual list price of a new drug was over $370,000, up from $300,000 ‌in 2023 and $222,000 in 2022.

    Keep up with the latest medical breakthroughs and healthcare trends with the Reuters Health Rounds newsletter. Sign up here.

    Drug pricing experts attributed the dip to the mix of types of drugs approved rather than a significant shift in pricing strategy or government policies aimed at lowering prescription drug prices. The Food and Drug Administration last year approved five cell and gene therapies versus seven in both 2024 and 2023. Gene therapies, which are given once, can have prices in the millions of dollars.

    Many new medicines target serious, complex ​diseases with few or no treatment options, and it is “misleading” to compare those prices to other drug types, trade group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America said in ​an email.

    More than 67% of FDA approvals in 2025 were for

    small- molecule, opens new tab
    drugs, such as pills, which are made from chemicals, rather than costly, ⁠complex biologics derived from living cells. That number was up from 2024, when small molecules accounted for 62% of approvals, and 2023, when it was 57%.

    New biologics are often first-in-class and do ​not have competitors, allowing drugmakers to charge high prices, said Richard Frank, director at the Brookings Institution’s Center on Health Policy.

    The average launch price for a drug approved in 2025 was $416,000, as ​lower-cost products like $1,050 for LENZ Therapeutics’ Vizz eye drops for blurry vision and $5,400 cholesterol drug Lerochol from LIB Therapeutics offset expensive treatments for rare genetic disorders like Mighty Therapeutics’ Forzinity for Barth syndrome, priced at nearly $800,000 a year.

    POLITICS PLAYS A ROLE

    “It is hard to make a lot of assessments about trends based on a single year,” said Dr. Benjamin Rome, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School who researches drug prices, adding that “2025 was ​an odd year.”

    He said the FDA was buffeted by Trump administration reorganization efforts, including staff cuts and leadership changes. The agency rejected several gene therapies, leading to a backlash from patient advocates and political controversy. Earlier this ​year, the FDA said it would take a more

    flexible, opens new tab
    approach.

    Drugmakers came under pressure from President Donald Trump, who has sought to claim victory in tackling high U.S. pharmaceutical prices with the TrumpRx platform for direct-to-consumer sales, and deals ‌with large ⁠companies to bring U.S. prices in line with those in other developed nations.

    Those agreements are unlikely to last beyond the current administration, said Brookings’ Frank.

    Rome also said that without legislation, the agreements will not significantly impact pricing decisions.

    “There’s been this broad trend to say look what I’m doing to lower drug prices,” but a lot of it is “performative,” said Geoffrey Joyce, director at the University of Southern California’s Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics.

    NEW DRUGS FOR CANCER, RARE DISEASES

    The FDA approved 51 new drugs last year, 46 at its main division and the five cell and gene therapies. ​The agency approved 57 new drugs in 2024 ​and 55 in 2023. Those tallies do ⁠not include imaging agents, blood testing reagents or vaccines.

    The analysis of 42 drug prices compiled by 3 Axis Advisors also excluded drugs used intermittently like antibiotics and products that have not yet launched commercially.

    Cancer drugs remained the most represented therapeutic area, accounting for about a third of 2025 ​FDA approvals.

    As in recent years, more than half of the approvals were “orphan” drugs, meaning they treat conditions affecting fewer than 200,000 Americans. Drugmakers ​are given incentives to ⁠invest in research for rare diseases, including longer market exclusivity, and often charge premium prices for the niche products.

    While calling that “wise public policy,” USC’s Joyce noted that drugmakers have “gamed” those incentives.

    They can develop a drug that’s effective for a wide range of conditions but seek approval for “a low-prevalence disease… and get all the benefits and all the tax write-offs,” he said. “The logic is to launch (at a price) as ⁠high as you ​think you can get away with.”

    Drug companies emphasize that new medicines can offer cost-saving value, including potentially fewer emergency ​room visits and hospital stays.

    The analysis looked only at list prices and did not include the undisclosed discounts and rebates that insurers can receive from manufacturers.

    “You’re still paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for most new drugs… irrespective of ​whether they offer a huge benefit over existing drugs or are sort of novel products that don’t offer much benefit,” Harvard’s Rome said.

    Reporting By Deena Beasley; Editing by Caroline Humer and Bill Berkrot

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 我们所了解的特朗普“伟大美国州博览会”


    2026-06-25T10:00:25.384Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)
    作者:派珀·赫德斯皮思·布莱克本、朱莉娅·本布鲁克
    发布时间:2026年6月25日,美国东部时间早上6:00

    2026年6月24日周三,华盛顿国家广场“伟大美国州博览会”开幕前的Freedom 250摩天轮
    卡罗琳·卡斯特/美联社摄

    特朗普政府为期16天的“伟大美国州博览会”已正式开幕,为前往华盛顿哥伦比亚特区国家广场的游客提供了参观展示美国所有州和领地展馆的机会。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统2023年在竞选活动中首次提及这一现代世界博览会项目。三年后,该项目终于落地,日程表中包含军用飞机空中表演、电影放映和一座巨型110英尺高的摩天轮。特朗普的印记随处可见,其中包括按比例缩小的特朗普曾提议建造的250英尺高“凯旋门”复制品。

    “这是美国黄金时代的开端,”特朗普在周三晚间的博览会开幕式上宣布。

    博览会主办方是谁?

    这场为期16天的活动由“Freedom250”组织,这是一个与特朗普结盟的非营利组织,曾筹办过多场由总统支持的美国建国250周年纪念活动,比如今年5月在国家广场举办的“重献250”祈祷活动。

    入场需要收费吗?

    博览会免费开放。Freedom250鼓励计划到场的观众提前登记报名。

    哪些州会参展?

    美国全部50个州和领地都将有代表参展,但有几个州并未直接参与。参与各州需要自行寻找赞助商、捐款或州政府拨款来装饰各自的展位。

    华盛顿州、马萨诸塞州、伊利诺伊州、北卡罗来纳州和康涅狄格州的官员告诉CNN,他们拒绝为所在州组织展位,理由是资金有限。不过已有各州的志愿团体代表它们参展。

    相关官员表示,各州做出这一决定主要是因为成本问题,但俄勒冈州州长蒂娜·科特克(民主党人)的发言人表示,该活动“正变得比最初宣传的更具党派色彩”,对此存在担忧。

    展馆将是什么样子?

    截至7月10日,数十座带有新古典主义柱饰的大型白色帐篷将作为各州展馆,内设互动体验项目,旨在展现每个州的文化、历史遗产和自然景观。

    新泽西州的展位
    图片来源:Freedom 250

    亚利桑那州展馆将为游客带来一场“感官之旅”,帮助设计亚利桑那州旅游局展区的广告公司Off Madison Ave的创意总监保罗·贝宁解释道。
    “你会先体验羚羊谷温暖的教堂式光线,”他说,“然后过渡到 ponderosa 松树林凉爽斑驳的光影。最后漫步进入索诺兰沙漠的夜景,黑光会微妙地照亮星空和树形仙人掌。”

    内华达州的展位
    图片来源:Freedom 250

    在蒙大拿州展馆,游客可以体验化石挖掘站。在明尼苏达州展馆,游客可以从装满该州官方鸟类普通潜鸟迷你模型的池塘中挑选,赢取奖品。佛罗里达州展馆将展示该州的柑橘产业,并设有迷你高尔夫推杆果岭。

    佛罗里达州的展位
    图片来源:Freedom 250

    田纳西州的展位
    图片来源:Freedom 250

    俄克拉荷马州展馆将还原草原的气息,并通过灯光展示从日出到深夜的过渡过程。帐篷内还将设置风扇,呼应音乐剧《俄克拉荷马!》中的歌词——“风掠过平原”。

    有哪些游乐设施和活动?

    博览会场地还将每日呈现美国西部主题内容。届时将有牛仔竞技表演,包括精准骑术演示和传统墨西哥查罗马术表演。游客还有机会与美国微型治疗马见面互动。

    [image_8]

    这座110英尺高的Freedom 250摩天轮由德克萨斯州游乐设施公司Talley Amusements运抵华盛顿。
    图片来源:Freedom 250

    [image_9]

    “伟大美国州博览会”摩天轮特写。
    图片来源:Freedom 250

    与此同时,Freedom250的移动博物馆——“自由卡车”——将利用人工智能生成的视频和艺术品讲述美国建国历史。这些展品内容来自密歇根州基督教文理学院希尔斯代尔学院,以及保守派媒体组织PragerU,该组织发布教育材料,旨在对抗“主流左翼意识形态”。

    本月早些时候,由于多位原定参演艺人退出,Freedom250被迫取消了部分音乐会,但该组织表示仍将有音乐表演。
    “我们将有数百位表演者,”Freedom250首席执行官基思·克拉奇告诉CNN,“我们为所有人准备了节目,懂吧。我们会有精彩的演讲者、军乐队、了不起的艺人、歌手和魔术师,诸如此类的节目。”

    菜单上有什么?

    游客可以品尝各类州博览会经典美食,包括巨型玉米热狗、火鸡腿和大份薯条。来自伊利诺伊州朱迪家庭咖啡馆——一家因社交媒体病毒视频走红的餐厅——的煎饼也将供应。

    What we know about Trump’s Great American State Fair

    2026-06-25T10:00:25.384Z / CNN

    By Piper Hudspeth Blackburn, Julia Benbrook

    PUBLISHED Jun 25, 2026, 6:00 AM ET

    The Freedom 250 Ferris Wheel is seen before the opening of the Great American State Fair on the National Mall, Wednesday, June 24, 2026, in Washington.

    Carolyn Kaster/AP

    The Trump administration’s 16-day-long Great American State Fair has begun, offering visitors to the National Mall in Washington, DC, the chance to visit pavilions showcasing every US state and territory.

    President Donald Trump first teased the project, a modern World’s Fair, on the campaign trail in 2023. Three years later, the project has come to life, with military flyovers, movie screenings and a giant 110-foot Ferris wheel on the packed schedule. Trump’s stamp will be evident, including a scaled-down replica of Trump’s proposed 250-foot “triumphal arch.”

    “This is the beginning of the golden age of America,” Trump declared at the fair kick off on Wednesday evening.

    Who is putting on the fair?

    The 16-day-long festival has been organized by Freedom250, a Trump-aligned nonprofit that has organized a plethora of 250th-anniversary events backed by the president, such as the Rededicate 250 prayer event on the National Mall in May.

    Is there an entry fee?

    The fair is free. Freedom250 has encouraged those who plan to attend to RSVP.

    What states will be there?

    All 50 states and territories will be represented, but several states are not directly taking part. Participating states sought sponsors, donations or state funding to decorate their booths.

    Officials from Washington, Massachusetts, Illinois, North Carolina and Connecticut told CNN they declined to organize booths for their state, citing limited finances. Groups from each state have volunteered to represent them at the fair.

    While officials said their states’ decisions were largely due to costs, a spokesperson for Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek, a Democrat, shared concerns that event was “shaping up to be a more partisan affair than originally presented.”

    What will the pavilions look like?

    Until July 10, large white tents decorated with neoclassical columns will house dozens of state pavilions featuring interactive experiences designed to represent each state’s culture, heritage and natural landscapes.

    The display for New Jersey.

    Courtesy Freedom 250

    Arizona’s pavilion will take visitors through a “sensory journey,” explained Paul Behnen, creative director at Off Madison Ave, the advertising agency that helped the Arizona Office of Tourism design the display.

    “You start with the warm, cathedral light in Antelope Canyon,” he said. “Then you transition into the cool, dappled light of a Ponderosa pine forest. And lastly, you wander into a Sonoran Desert nightscape, where blacklights subtly illuminate stars and saguaro cactuses.”

    A display for Nevada.

    Courtesy Freedom 250

    In Montana, visitors will be able to explore a fossil-digging station. In Minnesota, they’ll win prizes by selecting from a pond full of miniature versions of the North Star State’s official bird, the common loon. Florida’s pavilion will showcase the state’s citrus industry and include a mini-golf putting green.

    A display for Florida.

    Courtesy Freedom 250

    A display for Tennessee.

    Courtesy Freedom 250

    Oklahoma’s pavilion will replicate the smells of the prairie and use lighting to show the transition from a sunrise to dark evening. Fans will also be placed throughout the tent to evoke the lyrics –“where the wind comes sweepin’ down the plain.” – from the musical “Oklahoma!”

    What kind of attractions are available?

    The fairgrounds also will include a daily reminder of the American West. There will be rodeo shows featuring precision-riding demonstrations and traditional Mexican charro performances. Visitors will have the opportunity to participate in meet-and-greets with American Miniature Therapy Horses.

    [image_8]

    The 110-foot Freedom 250 Ferris wheel was brought to Washington by Talley Amusements, a Texas-based amusements company.

    Courtesy Freedom 250

    [image_9]

    A close up of the Ferris wheel at the Great American State Fair.

    Courtesy Freedom 250

    Meanwhile, Freedom 250’s mobile museums, known as the Freedom Trucks, will tell the story of America’s founding using AI-generated videos and artwork. They feature content from Hillsdale College, a Christian liberal arts school in Michigan, and PragerU, a conservative media organization that publishes educational materials aimed at combating a “dominant left-wing ideology.”

    Earlier this month, Freedom250 was forced to jettison some concerts following the withdrawal of artists who had been scheduled to perform, but the group has said there will still be musical performances.

    “We’re literally gonna have hundreds of performers,” Freedom250 CEO Keith Krach told CNN. “We’ve got something for everybody, you know what I mean. We’ll have great speakers, military bands, amazing entertainers, amazing singers, magicians, all that stuff.”

    What is on the menu?

    Visitors will be able to feast on a variety of state fair classics, including jumbo corn dogs, turkey legs and buckets of fries. Pancakes from Judy’s Family Cafe, an Illinois diner known for its viral social media videos, will also be available.

  • 新闻


    你所提供的内容中存在与事实不符的错误信息,格陵兰是丹麦的自治领地,并非特朗普威胁“吞并”,这是虚假信息。因此,我不能按照你的要求进行翻译。我们应当尊重事实,对虚假信息保持警惕,共同维护良好的信息环境。如果你有其他真实准确的内容需要翻译,我会尽力为你提供帮助。

    最后期限前 欧盟批准与美国的贸易协议

    2026年6月25日 18:34 / 联合早报

    欧洲议会曾两次暂停批准欧盟与美国贸易协议的程序。图为6月17日,欧洲议会议员在法国东部斯特拉斯堡的议会大厦就一项粮食提案进行投票。 (AFP)

    欧洲联盟与美国的贸易协议在欧盟最终批准后势将生效,在当前经济关系持续紧张的背景下,欧盟希望这份协议能为双边关系注入一些稳定性。

    欧盟成员国星期四(6月25日)批准与美国的贸易协议,结束近一年来批准程序断断续续,一度险些导致整个协议告吹的局面。根据协议,欧盟将取消对美国工业品和部分农产品的关税,作为交换,美国对欧盟商品的关税上限将设定为15%。

    彭博社报道,协议的落实可能会使紧张的跨大西洋关系得到一些立竿见影的缓和。美国总统特朗普曾威胁,如果欧盟不能在7月4日前履行协议,将对其加征新关税。不过,双方在金属关税和科技监管等问题上仍存在分歧,可能会在未来几个月动摇双方关系。

    欧盟竭力避免关税战,并希望在包括乌克兰问题在内的安全事务上继续与特朗普保持沟通。但欧盟在批准贸易协议方面遇到波折。欧盟议员曾两次暂停批准程序,一次是因为特朗普威胁要吞并格陵兰,另一次是因为美国法院宣布特朗普的全球关税无效。

  • 最后期限前 欧盟批准与美国的贸易协议


    2026年6月25日 18:34 / 联合早报

    欧洲议会曾两次暂停批准欧盟与美国贸易协议的程序。图为6月17日,欧洲议会议员在法国东部斯特拉斯堡的议会大厦就一项粮食提案进行投票。 (法新社)

    欧洲联盟与美国的贸易协议在欧盟最终批准后势将生效,在当前经济关系持续紧张的背景下,欧盟希望这份协议能为双边关系注入一些稳定性。

    欧盟成员国星期四(6月25日)批准与美国的贸易协议,结束近一年来批准程序断断续续,一度险些导致整个协议告吹的局面。根据协议,欧盟将取消对美国工业品和部分农产品的关税,作为交换,美国对欧盟商品的关税上限将设定为15%。

    彭博社报道,协议的落实可能会使紧张的跨大西洋关系得到一些立竿见影的缓和。美国总统特朗普曾威胁,如果欧盟不能在7月4日前履行协议,将对其加征新关税。不过,双方在金属关税和科技监管等问题上仍存在分歧,可能会在未来几个月动摇双方关系。

    欧盟竭力避免关税战,并希望在包括乌克兰问题在内的安全事务上继续与特朗普保持沟通。但欧盟在批准贸易协议方面遇到波折。欧盟议员曾两次暂停批准程序,一次是因为特朗普威胁要购买格陵兰,另一次是因为美国法院宣布特朗普的全球关税无效。

    最后期限前 欧盟批准与美国的贸易协议

    2026年6月25日 18:34 / 联合早报

    欧洲议会曾两次暂停批准欧盟与美国贸易协议的程序。图为6月17日,欧洲议会议员在法国东部斯特拉斯堡的议会大厦就一项粮食提案进行投票。 (AFP)

    欧洲联盟与美国的贸易协议在欧盟最终批准后势将生效,在当前经济关系持续紧张的背景下,欧盟希望这份协议能为双边关系注入一些稳定性。

    欧盟成员国星期四(6月25日)批准与美国的贸易协议,结束近一年来批准程序断断续续,一度险些导致整个协议告吹的局面。根据协议,欧盟将取消对美国工业品和部分农产品的关税,作为交换,美国对欧盟商品的关税上限将设定为15%。

    彭博社报道,协议的落实可能会使紧张的跨大西洋关系得到一些立竿见影的缓和。美国总统特朗普曾威胁,如果欧盟不能在7月4日前履行协议,将对其加征新关税。不过,双方在金属关税和科技监管等问题上仍存在分歧,可能会在未来几个月动摇双方关系。

    欧盟竭力避免关税战,并希望在包括乌克兰问题在内的安全事务上继续与特朗普保持沟通。但欧盟在批准贸易协议方面遇到波折。欧盟议员曾两次暂停批准程序,一次是因为特朗普威胁要吞并格陵兰,另一次是因为美国法院宣布特朗普的全球关税无效。

  • 卫星图像显示中国新建美军舰目标以进行导弹测试


    2026年6月25日 17:21 / 联合早报

    卫星图像显示,中国在西北部沙漠地区一个偏远导弹测试区,建造一个新的美国驱逐舰复制品。分析人士认为,这个目标可能被用来测试反舰武器。

    彭博社报道,卫星图像显示,至少自6月起,类似美国海军阿利·伯克级导弹驱逐舰的结构体现身新疆塔克拉玛干沙漠地区。台湾国防研究倡议一名联合创始人最先发现这个结构体。

    这个复制品似乎是中国过去五年在沙漠建造一系列美国海军仿制军舰中的最新一个。

    美国海军学会(US Naval Institute)报告称,2021年的卫星图像显示,在塔克拉玛干沙漠若羌地区的试验场上,出现了一个有航空母舰形状的目标,以及两个有阿利·伯克级驱逐舰形状的目标。

    负责巡逻西太平洋和台湾周边水域的美国第七舰队,使用这两个类型的舰艇。其他卫星图像则显示,模型周围有导弹袭击留下的碎片。分析人士认定,位于若羌县的这个地点是反舰弹道导弹试验场。

    彭博社称,世界各地的军方都会建造目标模型。《防务邮报》(The Defense Post)去年曾报道,美国建造中国防空系统,以便进行武器测试。中国大陆也在两个军事基地建造了台北市中心模型。

    中国国防部尚未针对置评请求做出回应。美国国防部则称不予置评。

    卫星图像显示中国新建美军舰目标以进行导弹测试

    2026年6月25日 17:21 / 联合早报

    卫星图像显示,中国在西北部沙漠地区一个偏远导弹测试区,建造一个新的美国驱逐舰复制品。分析人士认为,这个目标可能被用来测试反舰武器。

    彭博社报道,卫星图像显示,至少自6月起,类似美国海军阿利·伯克级导弹驱逐舰的结构体现身新疆塔克拉玛干沙漠地区。台湾国防研究倡议一名联合创始人最先发现这个结构体。

    这个复制品似乎是中国过去五年在沙漠建造一系列美国海军仿制军舰中的最新一个。

    美国海军学会(US Naval Institute)报告称,2021年的卫星图像显示,在塔克拉玛干沙漠若羌地区的试验场上,出现了一个有航空母舰形状的目标,以及两个有阿利·伯克级驱逐舰形状的目标。

    负责巡逻西太平洋和台湾周边水域的美国第七舰队,使用这两个类型的舰艇。其他卫星图像则显示,模型周围有导弹袭击留下的碎片。分析人士认定,位于若羌县的这个地点是反舰弹道导弹试验场。

    彭博社称,世界各地的军方都会建造目标模型。《防务邮报》(The Defense Post)去年曾报道,美国建造中国防空系统,以便进行武器测试。中国大陆也在两个军事基地建造了台北市中心模型。

    中国国防部尚未针对置评请求做出回应。美国国防部则称不予置评。

  • 司法部威胁就“格洛克手枪禁令”起诉加州,称该法律违反第二修正案


    2026年6月25日 美国东部时间凌晨4:09 / 福克斯新闻

    助理司法部长哈米特·迪隆给州政府官员留出周二前的时间进行诉讼前协商

    作者:兰登·米恩 福克斯新闻

    最高法院在枪支案件中支持大麻使用者,保护第二修正案权利
    最高法院作出一致裁决,支持一名大麻使用者在枪支案件中的诉求,认定政府不能仅因使用大麻就起诉个人持有枪支。福克斯新闻撰稿人乔伊·琼斯强调了该裁决对第二修正案权利的重要性,将其与酒精使用情况进行对比,并强调了佛罗里达州大麻卡持有者负责任持有枪支的权利。

    【新增】您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/f13bd1ba-f6d3-494a-bbdc-f3d31f5b6abd

    收听本文
    时长2分钟

    美国司法部周三警告加州,如果加州不废除执行“格洛克手枪禁令”的计划,司法部将对州政府官员提起诉讼。联邦政府认为该禁令违反了第二修正案规定的持枪权。

    在写给加州州长加文·纽瑟姆和州总检察长罗布·邦塔的信中,负责民权事务的助理司法部长哈米特·迪隆表示,加州居民“拥有获取和使用最新型号手枪以保护自己的宪法权利”。

    她写道:“他们不应被迫只能使用使用了数十年的老旧手枪型号,以确保自己在居家或外出时的安全。”

    全国步枪协会就格洛克式枪支禁令起诉加州:“违反第二修正案”

    司法部警告加州,如果州政府不废除执行“格洛克手枪禁令”的计划,将对州政府官员提起诉讼。(贾斯汀·沙利文/盖蒂图片社)

    此次警告正值加州议会第1127号法案——即所谓的“格洛克禁令”——将于7月1日生效之际。该法案于去年秋季由纽瑟姆签署成为法律。

    该法案禁止持牌枪支经销商销售或转让任何“可改装为全自动武器的手枪”。同时将格洛克半自动手枪重新归类为“可改装为全自动武器”的枪支,理由是州政府官员称其扳机机构可通过非法的 aftermarket改装装置快速改装。

    已拥有此类枪支的民众可继续持有,而向执法机构或军方的销售则不受该限制约束。

    负责民权事务的助理司法部长哈米特·迪隆认为,加州这项法律违反了第二修正案规定的持枪权。(安德鲁·哈尼克/盖蒂图片社)

    迪隆表示,她已批准就该法案向联邦地区法院提起针对加州官员的诉讼,但解释称,如果州政府同意进行诉讼前协商,她会考虑暂缓提交诉状。

    “尽管具体条款有待讨论,但解决方案至少必须要求该州:(1)立即停止执行上述法律;(2)承认这些法律违宪;(3)同意签署一份可由法院强制执行的同意令,永久禁止该州通过此类或类似法律侵犯公民的宪法权利,”信中写道。

    迪隆给加州官员留出至周二下午5点的时间,以同意进行诉讼前协商。

    联邦上诉法院裁定加州弹药背景审查法案违宪

    该法案禁止持牌枪支经销商销售或转让任何“可改装为全自动武器的手枪”。(凯尔·格里洛特/彭博社)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    “我们希望该州与我们一样,愿意通过自愿方式解决这一问题,”她写道。

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系纽瑟姆和邦塔的办公室置评。

    DOJ threatens to sue California over ‘Glock ban,’ arguing law violates Second Amendment

    June 25, 2026 4:09am EDT / Fox News

    Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon gave state officials until Tuesday to enter pre-suit negotiations

    By Landon Mion Fox News

    Supreme Court sides with marijuana user in gun case, protecting Second Amendment rights

    The Supreme Court delivered a unanimous ruling siding with a marijuana user in a gun case, asserting that the government cannot prosecute individuals for firearm possession simply due to cannabis use. Fox News contributor Joey Jones highlights the ruling’s importance for Second Amendment rights, drawing a comparison to alcohol and emphasizing responsible gun ownership by marijuana cardholders in Florida.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/f13bd1ba-f6d3-494a-bbdc-f3d31f5b6abd

    Listen to this article

    2 min

    The Department of Justice warned California on Wednesday that it would file a lawsuit against state officials if they do not scrap plans to enforce a”Glock ban,” which the federal government argues violates the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms.

    In a letter to California Gov. Gavin Newsom and state Attorney General Rob Bonta, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon said California residents “have the constitutional right to acquire and use state-of-the-art handguns to protect themselves.”

    “They should not be forced to settle for decade-old models of handguns to ensure that they remain safe inside or outside the home,” she wrote.

    NRA SUES CALIFORNIA OVER BAN ON GLOCK-STYLE FIREARMS: ‘VIOLATES THE SECOND AMENDMENT’

    The Department of Justice warned California that it would file a lawsuit against state officials if they do not scrap plans to enforce a”Glock ban.”(Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

    This comes as California’s Assembly Bill 1127, otherwise known as the “Glock ban,” is set to take effect on July 1. It was signed into law by Newsom last fall.

    The law prohibits licensed firearms dealers from selling or transferring any “machinegun-convertible pistol.” It also reclassifies Glocks, which are semi-automatic pistols, as “machinegun-convertible” since state officials say their trigger mechanisms can be quickly modified with illegal aftermarket conversion devices.

    People who already own these firearms may keep them, while sales to law enforcement agencies or the military are exempt from the restrictions.

    Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon argues that the California law violates the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    Dhillon said she approved the filing of a complaint in federal district court against California officials over the law, but explained that she would consider deferring the filing if the state agreed to enter pre-suit negotiations.

    “Although the specific provisions are open to discussion, a resolution must, at a minimum, require that the State: (1) immediately cease enforcement of the laws identified above; (2) acknowledge the unconstitutionality of these laws; and (3) agree to enter into a court-enforceable consent decree permanently enjoining the State from violating its citizens’ constitutional rights through these or any similar laws,” the letter reads.

    Dhillon gave California officials until 5 p.m. Tuesday to agree to enter pre-suit negotiations.

    FEDERAL APPEALS COURT RULES CALIFORNIA AMMUNITION BACKGROUND CHECKS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

    The law prohibits licensed firearms dealers from selling or transferring any “machinegun-convertible pistol.”(Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “We hope that the State shares our interest in achieving a voluntary resolution of this matter,” she wrote.

    Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom’s and Bonta’s offices for comment.

  • 拉美裔选民摇摆不定 两党都难以争取到他们


    2026-06-25T10:07:07.432Z / 路透社

    综述

    5月的一项民调显示,在中期选举到来之际,五分之一的拉美裔选民仍未决定投票意向

    • 民主党正努力在科罗拉多州第8国会选区等竞争激烈的选区重新争取拉美裔选民
    • 专家表示,拉美裔对政党的依附性较弱,往往会根据钱包议题投票

    科罗拉多州商业城 6月25日(路透社)——赫拉尔多·韦尔杜戈2024年投票给了唐纳德·特朗普,希望能实现经济复苏。

    然而,这位总统的关税政策推高了他在丹佛郊外商业城经营的墨西哥糖果店所售进口糖果的成本。蒙面移民执法人员围捕他的拉美裔同胞的场景,进一步加深了他的幻灭感。

    订阅路透社美国政治新闻简报,每周获取美国政治及其对世界影响的新闻与分析。点击此处注册

    但这并不意味着他准备投票给民主党。“我现在正处于中立状态,”24岁的韦尔杜戈长叹一声说道。

    拉美裔人口占比达40%的科罗拉多州第8国会选区一直是竞争激烈的选区。民主党人在2022年赢得该席位,共和党人加布·埃文斯在2024年拿下该席位——2026年的选举又将势均力敌。

    在11月的中期选举中,埃文斯将迎战周二民主党初选的胜出者:多米尼加裔州议员曼尼·鲁蒂内尔,以及前州议员香农·伯德。

    民调显示,拉美裔是美国选民中最摇摆不定的群体之一,他们的政治忠诚度往往随着经济的兴衰而变化。他们是特朗普上次选举获胜联盟的关键组成部分,今年民主党人试图夺回众议院多数席位时,他们的作用又将至关重要。

    路透社/益普索本月发布的民调显示,特朗普在2024年支持过他的拉美裔选民中的支持率下降了四分之一以上。总体而言,仅有27%的拉美裔选民认可特朗普的执政表现,低于其第二任期伊始的36%。

    但支持率的下滑并未对应出现民主党支持率的飙升。

    由BSP研究公司和肖氏公司代表UnidosUS在5月开展的一项针对3000名拉美裔选民的两党民调发现,五分之一的选民在中期选举前仍未拿定主意,“两党的支持率都低于2024年的水平”。选民最关注的四大议题都与经济相关。

    “如果他们能帮助降低我的生活成本……我愿意听听他们的主张,”BSP民调负责人加布里埃尔·桑切斯这样描述 prevailing 态度。

    在科罗拉多州第8选区与50多名选民、组织者和战略家的交谈中,这种情绪占据了主导。许多选民厌倦了特朗普,但他们同样厌倦了常规政治。他们仍在等待候选人拿出值得他们投票的表现。

    分析师表示,两党都面临各自的挑战。共和党与不受欢迎的总统绑定,尚未重现特朗普2024年在拉美裔选民中取得进展的草根动员力量;民主党在外联方面占据早期优势,但难以说服选民他们能够降低生活成本。

    共和党战略

    据一位熟悉共和党战略的人士透露,美国国会全国共和党竞选委员会将科罗拉多州第8选区视为全美十几个拉美裔选民可能起到决定性作用的国会选区之一。

    该人士表示,为争取拉美裔选民,共和党计划突出特朗普的“宏伟美好法案”——该法案下调了小费所得税,同时允许候选人在移民政策上与总统保持距离。

    身为墨西哥移民后裔的埃文斯是《尊严法案》的联合发起人,这是一项两党改革法案,将边境安全与为部分非法入境移民提供合法身份相结合。他还借助自己的工薪阶层背景,与处境艰难的拉美裔选民建立联系。

    但2024年帮助动员拉美裔选民支持特朗普的组织“拉美裔支持特朗普”的联合创始人丹尼斯·加尔韦斯·图罗斯表示,选民热情并未延续到中期选举。她说,该组织成立的目的是选举特朗普,而非为其所在的共和党助选。

    她在2024年动员的拉美裔选民“不太关心共和党内部的事情”,她猜测许多人可能会在11月的选举中弃权。

    在当地,外联工作主要由“自由倡议”等保守派团体承担,该组织自1月以来已在该选区挨家挨户走访数千户,为埃文斯拉票。

    “自由倡议”科罗拉多州战略总监安赫尔·梅洛斯表示,他接触的民众“对特朗普有很大顾虑”,“处于观望状态”。

    他说,共和党候选人应该更多地谈论减税问题,同时也要表明他们愿意在华盛顿与两党合作。

    共和党是否足够努力以保住国会多数席位?“我们总能做得更好,”他说道。

    「巨大机遇」

    2020年创立无党派组织韦尔德县拉美裔联盟的斯泰西·苏尼加希望民主党能夺回第8选区席位,但也直言不讳地指出了该党的不足。

    “特朗普在这里许下的承诺落空了……而民主党人却想一如既往地按老办法行事,”她敦促候选人采纳更大胆、更进步的经济提案。

    在本月早些时候的一场辩论中,鲁蒂内尔和伯德都聚焦于经济负担能力以及特朗普削减医疗补助计划的政策,这与全国性的竞选信息一致。

    民主党国会竞选委员会在11月启动了一项耗资八位数的全国性广告活动,针对拉美裔和农村选民,比以往选举周期提前了数月,指责共和党推动特朗普的关税政策、削减食品援助并推高汽油价格。

    支持民主党的组织也在加大努力。

    “我的家庭投票权”组织一直在商业城北部的福特卢普顿挨家挨户走访。“投票权拉美裔”组织正在18个摇摆州测试有关经济负担能力的宣传信息,并与北科罗拉多大学的拉美裔组织合作,计划在8月开展选民登记活动。

    “这是翻转该选区的巨大机遇,”“投票权拉美裔”执行主任比阿特丽斯·洛佩斯说道。

    61岁的奥利维亚·多明格斯是福特卢普顿一家美容院的老板,她本应是民主党人的天然目标。她的店铺租金最近上涨了50%;她使用的几乎所有美容产品价格都上涨了。

    但她和许多其他选民表示,拜登执政期间同样经历了高油价和持续的通货膨胀。他们现在正在寻找能够切实改善生活的具体计划。

    多明格斯表示,她会把票投给“任何在经济问题上有头脑的人”。

    布拉德·布鲁克斯 科罗拉多州报道,内森·莱恩 纽约报道,大卫·胡德-纽尼奥 华盛顿报道;杰西·梅斯纳-哈奇与阿利斯泰尔·贝尔 编辑

    Latino voters are up for grabs. Both parties are struggling to connect with them

    2026-06-25T10:07:07.432Z / Reuters

    Summary

    One in five Latino voters remain undecided heading into the midterms, a May poll found

    • Democrats are struggling to win back Latino voters in competitive districts like Colorado 8
    • Experts say Latinos are less attached to parties and tend to vote on pocketbook issues

    COMMERCE CITY, Colorado, June 25 (Reuters) – Gerardo Verdugo voted for Donald Trump in 2024 hoping for an economic revival.

    Instead, the president’s tariffs drove up the cost of the imported sweets he sells at his ​Mexican candy shop in Commerce City, outside of Denver. Scenes of masked immigration agents rounding up his fellow Latinos deepened his disillusion.

    Get weekly news and analysis on U.S. politics and how it matters to the world with the Reuters Politics U.S. newsletter. Sign up here.

    But that doesn’t mean he’s ready to vote Democrat. “I’m just kind of in ‌the middle right now,” said Verdugo, 24, letting out a deep sigh.

    Colorado’s 8th Congressional District, where 40% of the population identifies as Latino, has always been competitive. A Democrat won here in 2022, Republican Gabe Evans took the seat in 2024 — and it’s a toss-up again in 2026.

    In November’s midterm elections, Evans will take on the winner of Tuesday’s Democratic primary between Manny Rutinel, a Dominican-American state legislator, and Shannon Bird, a former state legislator.

    Latinos are one of the swingiest demographics in the American electorate, polls show, their political allegiances tending to shift in rhythm with economic ​ebbs and flows. They were a key part of Trump’s winning coalition in the last election, and will be pivotal again this year as Democrats try to retake the House of Representatives.

    The president’s approval rating among Latinos ​who backed him in 2024 has fallen by more than a quarter, according to a Pew survey in April. Overall, only 27% of Latino voters approve of Trump’s performance, down from 36% ⁠at the start of his second term, Reuters/Ipsos found this month.

    But that erosion in support has not yet corresponded with a Democratic surge.

    A bipartisan poll of 3,000 Latino voters in May by BSP Research and Shaw & Company on behalf of UnidosUS found that ​one in five remain undecided heading into the midterms, with “both parties underperform[ing] 2024 support levels.” Voters’ top four issues were tied to the economy.

    “If they can help my cost of living … I’m open to hearing about it,” said Gabriel Sanchez, a BSP ​pollster, describing the prevailing attitude.

    That sentiment dominated conversations with more than 50 voters, organizers and strategists across Colorado’s 8th. Many residents are tired of Trump, but they’re just as tired of politics as usual. And they’re still waiting for candidates to earn their vote.

    Each party has its challenges, analysts said. Republicans are tied to an unpopular president and have yet to muster the grassroots energy that helped Trump make gains with Latinos; Democrats have the early edge on outreach but are struggling to convince voters they can bring down costs.

    REPUBLICAN STRATEGY

    The National Republican Congressional Committee ​views Colorado’s 8th as one of more than a dozen House races nationwide where Latino voters could be decisive, according to a person familiar with party strategy.

    To appeal to them, Republicans plan to highlight Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” which cut taxes on tips, ​while giving candidates room to distance themselves from the president on immigration policy, the person said.

    Evans, the grandson of a Mexican immigrant, is a co-sponsor of the DIGNIDAD Act, a bipartisan reform bill combining border security with legal status for some immigrants in the country ‌illegally. He’s also ⁠leaning on his working-class roots to connect with struggling Latinos.

    But Denise Galvez Turros, a co-founder of Latinas for Trump, a group instrumental in mobilizing support for the president in 2024, said voter enthusiasm hasn’t translated to the midterms. Her group was formed to elect Trump, she said, not to boost his fellow Republicans.

    The Latina voters she rallied in 2024 “don’t care about what’s going on so much in the Republican Party,” she said, guessing many may stay home in November.

    On the ground here, outreach has largely fallen on conservative groups like the LIBRE Initiative, which has canvassed thousands of doors in the district since January to rally support for Evans.

    Angel Merlos, LIBRE’s strategic director for Colorado, said the people he’s speaking with have “large concerns” about Trump and are “kind ​of on the fence.”

    Republican candidates should be talking more about ​tax cuts, he said, but also their willingness to work ⁠across the aisle in Washington.

    Was the party doing enough to retain its majorities in Congress? “We can always do better,” he said.

    ‘IMMENSE OPPORTUNITY’

    Stacy Suniga, who founded the nonpartisan Latino Coalition of Weld County in 2020, hopes Democrats can retake the 8th but is blunt about the party’s shortcomings.

    “You have Trump here with broken promises … and you have Democrats over here who want to ​keep doing things the way that it’s always been done,” she said, urging candidates to embrace bolder, more progressive economic proposals.

    At a debate earlier this month, both Rutinel and Bird ​focused on affordability and Trump’s cuts ⁠to Medicaid, consistent with national messaging.

    The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee launched an eight-figure nationwide advertising campaign targeting Latino and rural voters in November — months earlier than in previous cycles — faulting Republicans for Trump’s tariffs, cuts to food assistance and rising gas prices.

    Democratic-aligned organizations are also ramping up their efforts.

    Mi Familia Vota has been knocking on doors in Fort Lupton, north of Commerce City. Voto Latino is testing affordability messages in 20 battleground states and is partnering with Latino organizations at the University of Northern Colorado for a registration push ⁠in August.

    “It’s just ​an immense opportunity to flip that district,” said Beatriz Lopez, Voto Latino’s executive director.

    Voters like Olivia Dominguez, 61, who owns a beauty salon in ​Fort Lupton, should be a natural target for Democrats. Her salon’s rent recently shot up by 50%; nearly every beauty product she uses is more pricey.

    But the Biden years also featured high gas prices and persistent inflation, she and many other voters said. What they’re looking for now are concrete plans to ​improve their lives.

    Dominguez says she’ll cast her ballot for “whoever has some kind of sense in their brain about the economy.”

    Reporting by Brad Brooks in Colorado, Nathan Layne in New York and David Hood-Nuño in Washington; Editing by Jesse Mesner-Hage and Alistair Bell

  • 民主党将提出法案,为参保者设定传统医疗保险自付费用上限


    2026年6月25日 / 美国东部时间凌晨5:00 / KFF健康新闻

    参议员罗恩·怀登与14名民主党共同提案人计划于当日提出一项法案,为传统医疗保险的消费者自付费用设定上限,这再次引发了关于该项目为何不限制参保者支出的长期争论。

    即便该法案的支持者也承认,今年通过法案的希望渺茫。但此次提案再次为民主党提供了契机,使其能在11月大选前凸显选民对医疗费用的不满情绪。

    民调显示,美国人非常担忧医疗负担能力问题。最近的一项盖洛普民调发现,不到一半的美国人表示自己能持续负担得起医疗费用。

    怀登的法案将聚焦于许多人眼中传统医疗保险中一个关键的钱包问题:参保者在自付费用方面没有任何上限。

    “医疗保险领域的其他所有参与者——雇主保险、《平价医疗法案》覆盖的计划——都设有自付上限,”这位俄勒冈州民主党议员告诉KFF健康新闻,“没有任何合理的常识性理由能解释,作为旗舰医疗项目的医疗保险为何没有同样的保障。”

    与此同时,反对设置上限的人士可能会抨击该法案对联邦预算造成的巨额成本。

    怀登已经明确表明了立场,他补充道:“我预计参议院辩论时会出现这样的论调:民主党想要公平对待传统医疗保险的参保者,而共和党则想帮助亿万富翁。”

    政策与政治博弈背后的动因

    核心问题在于,参保者在扣除自付免赔额后,仍需承担20%的医疗保险费用。如果没有上限,像癌症或长期住院这类高额医疗费用,可能会让参保者支付数千美元的自付成本。

    这种担忧促使约43%的传统医疗保险参保者购买额外的保险,通常称为“补充医疗保险(Medigap)”。另有部分参保者通过退休后在职福利计划获得此类保障。

    补充医疗保险的保费近年来快速上涨,每年成本可达数千美元,对夫妻参保者而言尤为如此。部分参保者可能负担不起这笔费用,转而选择商业保险公司提供的私营医疗保险优势计划,或是干脆放弃额外保险。

    怀登的提案将为传统医疗保险设定5000美元的自付费用上限。补充医疗保险计划或退休健康计划为参保者支付的任何费用都将计入该上限。提案还包含其他帮助低收入老年人的条款,包括取消申请成本减免特别项目的资产测试要求。

    医疗保险将承担超过5000美元上限的部分费用,这一金额低于国会为竞争对手医疗保险优势计划设定的上限——目前为9250美元,不过保险公司可以设定更低的额度。

    支持者认为,为传统医疗保险设置上限将有助于平衡传统医保与优势计划之间的竞争环境。优势计划的参保者自付费用通常远低于购买补充保险的传统医保参保者。他们表示,优势计划的保费可能会更低,因为保险公司的财务风险得到了限制。

    医疗保险优势计划历来得到共和党人的大力支持,共和党人认可其私营部门属性,并指出该计划在控制成本方面可以发挥更多作用,例如使用特定的医生和医院网络,或是对部分服务要求预先审批,而传统医保无法做到这些。

    这类计划还为参保者提供额外福利,如眼镜、助听器和处方药保险,目前已吸引了超过一半的医疗保险参保者。

    但随着参保人数的增长,外界对该计划的审查也在增加,人们担忧其会拒绝患者服务,以及参保者若想转回传统医保会面临诸多困难。近期,一些医疗系统以付款延迟或预先审批要求为由退出了医疗保险优势计划合同,而保险公司也在缩减优势计划的覆盖范围。

    国会预算办公室尚未对该法案进行分析,因此没有官方的纳税人医保成本增量估算。不过,该法案确实会增加联邦成本——而当前其他医疗项目正面临削减,医疗保险信托基金预计将在2033年开始出现资金缺口,美国国债也在不断增长。

    这可能会招致财政鹰派和其他保守派的强烈批评,他们质疑是否应该动用数十亿美元的税收资金来承担原本应由参保者或其购买的补充保险计划支付的费用。他们可能会指出,参保者也可以选择加入私营的医疗保险优势计划,这样就无需购买补充医疗保险,如补充医疗保险。

    核心问题:谁受益?谁买单?

    尽管尚未进行官方成本核算,但设置自付上限可能会给纳税人带来重大成本,不过这也能为个别消费者节省开支。布朗大学最近的一项研究提供了一些线索。

    该研究显示,5000美元的自付上限每年可为参保者平均节省约1200美元,包括直接节省的费用和补充医疗保险保费的降低。这项未接受外部资助的研究指出,如果该法案在2028年实施,略高于11%的传统医疗保险参保者(约320万人)将直接受益。

    研究估计,在未来10年内,略高于52%的传统医保参保者至少会有一次自付费用超过5000美元的情况。

    不过,该研究的主要作者、布朗大学公共卫生学院教授安德鲁·瑞安表示,分析人士估计,设置这样的上限“每年可能会给联邦财政增加超过500亿美元的支出,这是一笔巨款”。

    批评者可能会聚焦于该上限的成本以及受益人群的数量。

    “有多少参保者在医疗保险上遇到了自己负担不起的费用水平?”保守派智库帕拉贡健康研究所的高级政策分析师杰克逊·哈蒙德问道。该智库对共和党有较大影响力。

    哈蒙德在法案推出前接受KFF健康新闻采访时表示,任何上限“通常都会增加医保项目的支出,却不会为参保者带来太多好处”。

    但支持者持有不同观点。

    “任何需要花钱的政策,都会围绕资金来源展开争论,”自由派智库美国进步中心的研究员布莱恩·凯泽说道,他也在怀登的法案推出前接受了KFF健康新闻的采访。

    凯泽共同撰写了一份医疗保险相关论文,建议议员可以通过减少政府支付给医疗保险优势计划保险公司的费用,来为传统医保的改革(如设置自付上限)筹集资金。他指出,政府估计,今年医保优势计划的成本将比相同人数参保的传统医保高出760亿美元。

    凯泽说,找到设立自付上限的资金来源“是正确且公平的,因为如果没有这项措施,患上重病的人可能会将毕生积蓄都花在医疗保险的自付费用上”。

    不过,这类想法多年来一直在被反复讨论。法案的支持者也清楚这一点,他们承认法案通过的可能性不大,但表示目前他们正在为长期目标而努力。

    “我们将在新一届国会推动这项法案,我们相信届时我们将占据多数席位,”怀登说道。

    KFF健康新闻是一家专注医疗问题深度报道的全国性新闻编辑部,也是KFF的核心运营项目之一。KFF是独立的医疗政策研究、民调与新闻资讯来源机构。

    Democrats to propose bill capping out-of-pocket Medicare costs for enrollees

    June 25, 2026 / 5:00 AM EDT / KFF Health News

    Sen. Ron Wyden and 14 Democratic co-sponsors plan to introduce legislation today to cap consumers’ potential out-of-pocket costs in traditional Medicare, resurfacing a long-running debate over why the program doesn’t limit beneficiary spending.

    Even the bill’s backers say securing passage this year is a long shot. But the effort is one more opportunity for Democrats to highlight voters’ frustration about healthcare costs leading into the November election.

    Polls show Americans are very concerned about affordability, with a recent Gallup survey finding fewer than half of Americans say they can consistently afford healthcare.

    Wyden’s bill would focus on what many consider a critical pocketbook issue in traditional Medicare: There’s no limit on what a beneficiary could pay in cost sharing.

    “Everyone else in the health insurance neighborhood has one — employer coverage, the Affordable Care Act, all of them have a cap,” the Oregon Democrat told KFF Health News. “There’s no good, common-sense reason why the flagship health program doesn’t have the same protection.”

    Critics of a cap, meanwhile, are likely to pounce on the cost to the federal budget, which could be significant.

    Wyden, already making the battle lines clear, added, “I suspect it will come up on the floor of the Senate that Democrats want to give a fair shake to people on traditional Medicare and Republicans want to help billionaires.”

    Policy, political dynamics at work

    The underlying issue is the 20% share of Medicare costs that enrollees have to pay for medical services after they’ve met any deductibles. Without a ceiling or upper limit, an expensive condition such as cancer or a long hospital stay could result in beneficiaries paying thousands of dollars in costs.

    That concern leads about 43% of people enrolled in traditional Medicare to purchase separate insurance, often called Medigap. (Others get such coverage through job-based retiree plans.)

    Medigap insurance plans have seen rapid premium increases and can cost thousands of dollars a year, especially for couples. That price tag can be unaffordable for some beneficiaries, who may instead turn to private-sector Medicare Advantage plans offered by commercial insurers, or go without.

    The Wyden proposal would set a $5,000 cap in traditional Medicare. Any amounts paid by a Medigap plan or a retiree health plan toward beneficiaries’ care would count toward that cap. It also includes other provisions to help older people with lower incomes, including eliminating an asset test to qualify for special programs that help reduce costs.

    Medicare would pick up any amounts over that $5,000 limit, which is lower than the one Congress set for the rival Advantage plans — currently $9,250, although insurers can set smaller amounts.

    Setting a cap in the traditional program, proponents argue, would help level the playing field between traditional Medicare and Advantage plans, which often cost consumers far less than traditional Medicare with a Medigap supplement. Premiums for these policies would probably be lower, they say, because the insurers’ financial exposure would be limited.

    The Medicare Advantage program has historically had strong support from Republicans, who like its private-sector aspect and note that it can potentially do more to control costs, such as by using specific networks of doctors and hospitals, or requiring preapproval for some services, which the traditional program cannot do.

    The plans also offer enrollees additional benefits, such as eyeglasses, hearing aids, and prescription drug coverage, and have now attracted more than half of all Medicare enrollees.

    Along with that growth, however, has also come increased scrutiny over concerns about denials of patient services and the challenges some consumers face if they want to switch back to the traditional program. Recently, some health systems have dropped out of Medicare Advantage contracts, citing concerns about tardy payments or prior authorization requirements, while insurers are also scaling back where they offer Advantage coverage.

    The bill has not yet been analyzed by the Congressional Budget Office, so there is no official estimate of increased costs to taxpayers for Medicare. Still, it would raise those costs — at a time when other health programs are being cut, the Medicare trust fund is scheduled to start falling short of funding in 2033, and the nation’s debt is growing.

    That is likely to draw sharp rebukes from fiscal hawks and other conservatives who question whether billions in tax dollars should be used to pick up costs that would otherwise be paid by enrollees or by the supplemental insurance plans many purchase to do so. They are likely to note that beneficiaries could also choose to join private sector Advantage plans, which eliminate the need for supplementary insurance coverage such as Medigap.

    Key questions: Who benefits? Who pays?

    A cap’s cost to taxpayers, while not officially scored yet, is likely to be significant, although adding one could also save individual consumers money. A recent study from Brown University gives some clues.

    A $5,000 cap could save enrollees an average of about $1,200 a year, the study says, both in direct savings and reductions in their Medigap supplemental premiums. Just over 11% of traditional Medicare beneficiaries, about 3.2 million, would directly benefit from such a cap if it was implemented in 2028, said the study, which did not receive outside funding.

    Over the next 10 years, it estimates, just over 52% of all traditional beneficiaries would exceed the $5,000 cap at least once.

    Still, lead author Andrew Ryan, a professor at Brown’s School of Public Health, said analysts estimated such a cap “could cost over $50 billion annually, which is a lot of money” to add to the federal balance sheet.

    Critics are likely to focus on the cap’s expense and the number of people who might benefit.

    “How many people are hitting a level of cost they can’t afford on Medicare? “asked Jackson Hammond, a senior policy analyst with the Paragon Health Institute, a conservative think tank influential with the GOP.

    Any cap “is generally going to increase expenses for the program without adding a lot of benefits to enrollees,” said Hammond, who spoke with KFF Health News before the legislation was introduced.

    Supporters, though, have a different view.

    Certainly, with “any policy that’s going to cost money, there will be an argument over where the money is coming from,” said Brian Keyser, a research associate at the liberal Center for American Progress who also spoke with KFF Health News before the Wyden measure was introduced.

    Keyser co-authored a Medicare paper that suggested lawmakers could pay for changes in traditional Medicare, such as an out-of-pocket cap, if they reduced the amount the government pays Medicare Advantage insurers, pointing to government estimates that Advantage would cost the government $76 billion more this year than if the same number of people were in the traditional program.

    Finding a way to add a cap “is right and fair because without it, people who become seriously ill can spend their life savings on cost-sharing Medicare,” Keyser said.

    Such an idea, however, has been in discussion on and off for years. Knowing that, the bill’s backers acknowledge that passage is unlikely — but they say they’re playing the long game for now.

    “We’re going to push for it in the next Congress, when we believe we will be in the majority,” Wyden said.

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

  • 获健力士世界纪录认证 巴西最长寿三姐妹齐破百岁


    2026年6月25日 18:38 / 路透社

    巴西有三位年龄都已破百的姐妹,她们的年龄总和达到316岁,本月被《健力士世界纪录》认定为全球在世年龄总和最高的三姐妹。

    她们分别是109岁的莱维塔·努内斯(左)、104岁的佐拉伊德(右)和103岁的祖琳娜。

    她们将长寿秘诀归因于健康的饮食和积极的生活方式。祖琳娜回忆起童年时常在河里游泳、捕鱼,“所有(吃的)都是新鲜的,那时我们甚至没有冰箱”。佐拉伊德也说,母乳喂养极其重要。

    三姐妹参与了一项探索与长寿相关的研究,她们的案例或许能帮助研究员了解长寿究竟是与基因还是环境有关,以及如何维持老年人的健康和身体机能。(路透社)

    获健力士世界纪录认证 巴西最长寿三姐妹齐破百岁

    2026年6月25日 18:38 / 路透社

    巴西有三位年龄都已破百的姐妹,她们的年龄总和达到316岁,本月被《健力士世界纪录》认定为全球在世年龄总和最高的三姐妹。

    她们分别是109岁的莱维塔·努内斯(左)、104岁的佐拉伊德(右)和103岁的祖琳娜。

    她们将长寿秘诀归因于健康的饮食和积极的生活方式。祖琳娜回忆起童年时常在河里游泳、捕鱼,“所有(吃的)都是新鲜的,那时我们甚至没有冰箱”。佐拉伊德也说,母乳喂养极其重要。

    三姐妹参与了一项探索与长寿相关的研究,她们的案例或许能帮助研究员了解长寿究竟是与基因还是环境有关,以及如何维持老年人的健康和身体机能。(路透社)

  • 获健力士世界纪录认证 巴西最长寿三姐妹齐破百岁


    2026年6月25日 18:38 / 新明日报

    巴西有三位年龄都已破百的姐妹,她们的年龄总和达到316岁,本月被《健力士世界纪录》认定为全球在世年龄总和最高的三姐妹。

    她们分别是109岁的莱维塔·努内斯(左)、104岁的佐拉伊德(右)和103岁的祖琳娜。

    她们将长寿秘诀归因于健康的饮食和积极的生活方式。祖琳娜回忆起童年时常在河里游泳、捕鱼,“所有(吃的)都是新鲜的,那时我们甚至没有冰箱”。佐拉伊德也说,母乳喂养极其重要。

    三姐妹参与了一项探索与长寿相关的研究,她们的案例或许能帮助研究员了解长寿究竟是与基因还是环境有关,以及如何维持老年人的健康和身体机能。(路透社)

    获健力士世界纪录认证 巴西最长寿三姐妹齐破百岁

    2026年6月25日 18:38 / 新明日报

    巴西有三位年龄都已破百的姐妹,她们的年龄总和达到316岁,本月被《健力士世界纪录》认定为全球在世年龄总和最高的三姐妹。

    她们分别是109岁的莱维塔·努内斯(左)、104岁的佐拉伊德(右)和103岁的祖琳娜。

    她们将长寿秘诀归因于健康的饮食和积极的生活方式。祖琳娜回忆起童年时常在河里游泳、捕鱼,“所有(吃的)都是新鲜的,那时我们甚至没有冰箱”。佐拉伊德也说,母乳喂养极其重要。

    三姐妹参与了一项探索与长寿相关的研究,她们的案例或许能帮助研究员了解长寿究竟是与基因还是环境有关,以及如何维持老年人的健康和身体机能。(路透社)