作者: root

  • 以色列重开加沙过境点 允救援物资进入


    发布时间 / 来源:2026年3月3日 10:59 / 联合早报

    2月2日,好些巴勒斯坦人通过凯雷姆沙洛姆(Kerem Shalom)过境点离开加沙地带,入境以色列。 (路透社)

    以色列说,将于星期二重开通往加沙地带的一个过境点,以便让“人道救援物资逐步进入”有关地区。

    法新社报道,在美国和以色列上星期六(2月28日)对伊朗发动攻击之际,凯雷姆沙洛姆(Kerem Shalom)过境点也宣布关闭。

    以色列国防部政府活动协调处(COGAT)星期二(3月3日)说,当局根据安全评估作出重开上述过境点的决定。

    以色列上周六以安全为由,宣布关闭所有通往加沙的过境点,包括拉法口岸。

    拉法口岸是加沙的关键过境点,两年多的战争期间一直受到以色列严格管控和封锁,此前于2月2日重新开放拉法口岸,但限制人员通行。

    美国总统特朗普星期一(2日)警告称,其对伊朗的打击行动可能持续超过一个月。

    以色列重开加沙过境点 允救援物资进入

    发布时间 / 来源:2026年3月3日 10:59 / 联合早报

    2月2日,好些巴勒斯坦人通过凯雷姆沙洛姆(Kerem Shalom)过境点离开加沙地带,入境以色列。 (路透社)

    以色列说,将于星期二重开通往加沙地带的一个过境点,以便让“人道救援物资逐步进入”有关地区。

    法新社报道,在美国和以色列上星期六(2月28日)对伊朗发动攻击之际,凯雷姆沙洛姆(Kerem Shalom)过境点也宣布关闭。

    以色列国防部政府活动协调处(COGAT)星期二(3月3日)说,当局根据安全评估作出重开上述过境点的决定。

    以色列上周六以安全为由,宣布关闭所有通往加沙的过境点,包括拉法口岸。

    拉法口岸是加沙的关键过境点,两年多的战争期间一直受到以色列严格管控和封锁,此前于2月2日重新开放拉法口岸,但限制人员通行。

    美国总统特朗普星期一(2日)警告称,其对伊朗的打击行动可能持续超过一个月。

  • 以色列重开加沙过境点 允救援物资进入


    2026-03-03T02:59:13.000Z / 联合早报

    2月2日,好些巴勒斯坦人通过凯雷姆沙洛姆(Kerem Shalom)过境点离开加沙地带,入境以色列。 (路透社)

    以色列说,将于星期二重开通往加沙地带的一个过境点,以便让“人道救援物资逐步进入”有关地区。

    法新社报道,在美国和以色列上星期六(2月28日)对伊朗发动攻击之际,凯雷姆沙洛姆(Kerem Shalom)过境点也宣布关闭。

    以色列国防部政府活动协调处(COGAT)星期二(3月3日)说,当局根据安全评估作出重开上述过境点的决定。

    以色列上周六以安全为由,宣布关闭所有通往加沙的过境点,包括拉法口岸。

    拉法口岸是加沙的关键过境点,两年多的战争期间一直受到以色列严格管控和封锁,此前于2月2日重新开放拉法口岸,但限制人员通行。

    美国总统特朗普星期一(2日)警告称,其对伊朗的打击行动可能持续超过一个月。

    以色列重开加沙过境点 允救援物资进入

    2026-03-03T02:59:13.000Z / 联合早报

    2月2日,好些巴勒斯坦人通过凯雷姆沙洛姆(Kerem Shalom)过境点离开加沙地带,入境以色列。 (路透社)

    以色列说,将于星期二重开通往加沙地带的一个过境点,以便让“人道救援物资逐步进入”有关地区。

    法新社报道,在美国和以色列上星期六(2月28日)对伊朗发动攻击之际,凯雷姆沙洛姆(Kerem Shalom)过境点也宣布关闭。

    以色列国防部政府活动协调处(COGAT)星期二(3月3日)说,当局根据安全评估作出重开上述过境点的决定。

    以色列上周六以安全为由,宣布关闭所有通往加沙的过境点,包括拉法口岸。

    拉法口岸是加沙的关键过境点,两年多的战争期间一直受到以色列严格管控和封锁,此前于2月2日重新开放拉法口岸,但限制人员通行。

    美国总统特朗普星期一(2日)警告称,其对伊朗的打击行动可能持续超过一个月。

  • 内坦亚胡:伊朗冲突不会是“无休止战争”


    2026年3月3日 11:19 / 联合早报

    以色列总理内坦亚胡说,这场战事“可能需要一段时间,但不会持续数年”。 (法新社)

    以色列总理内坦亚胡表示,伊朗冲突不会成为“无休止的战争”,但可能持续一段时间。

    内坦亚胡星期一(3月2日)接受福克斯新闻采访时说:“这不是无休止的战争,而是通往和平的门户。”

    他也表示,这场战事将采取“迅速而果断的行动”,但补充说“可能需要一段时间,但不会持续数年”。

    另一方面,美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)星期一公布的最新民意调查结果显示,近六成美国民众不赞成美国对伊朗采取军事行动。

    这项民意调查显示,59%的受访者不赞成对伊朗采取军事行动,41%表示赞成。

    39%的受访者认为,美国没有尽力首先通过外交手段解决问题,只有27%的人认为美国在对伊朗动武之前,已尽力通过外交手段解决问题。

    内坦亚胡:伊朗冲突不会是“无休止战争”

    2026年3月3日 11:19 / 联合早报

    以色列总理内坦亚胡说,这场战事“可能需要一段时间,但不会持续数年”。 (法新社)

    以色列总理内坦亚胡说,伊朗冲突不会成为“无休止的战争”,但可能持续一段时间。

    内坦亚胡星期一(3月2日)接受福克斯新闻采访时说:“这不是无休止的战争,而是通往和平的门户。”

    他也说,这场战事将采取“迅速而果断的行动”,但补充说“可能需要一段时间,但不会持续数年”。

    另一方面,美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)星期一公布的最新民意调查结果显示,近六成美国民众不赞成美国对伊朗采取军事行动。

    这项民意调查显示,59%的受访者不赞成对伊朗采取军事行动,41%表示赞成。

    39%受访者认为,美国没有尽力首先通过外交手段解决问题,只有27%的人认为美国在对伊朗动武之前,已尽力通过外交手段解决问题。

  • 美海军:解放军料很快部署两款新核潜艇 能从中国近海打击美国


    2026-03-03T01:36:52.000Z / 联合早报

    image

    美国海军情报部门负责人表示,中国海军已大幅增加潜艇产量,并可能很快部署一种新型潜艇。该潜艇能从中国近海受保护水域,发射核导弹打击美国大片地区。

    据彭博社星期二(3月3日)报道,美国海军情报局局长布鲁克斯(Mike Brookes)少将在提交给美中经济与安全审查委员会的声明中指出,中国两艘新型潜艇095型和096型“预计将在2020年代末至2030年代期间服役”。这份声明是为下个星期一(3月9日)举行的听证会准备的。

    布鲁克斯称,这些潜艇将在核动力系统设计、传感器性能、武器集成,以及降噪技术方面实现重大提升。

    布鲁克斯指出,096型潜艇预计将装备JL-4型核导弹,“可从中国近海的受保护水域对美国大片地区实施打击”。他并补充说,该新型能力从根本上增强了中国的战略威慑可信度。

    据报道,布鲁克斯的声明是目前关于中国水下力量最完整、最新且未列为机密的概述。

    声明给出了美国对中国扩大生产、加快部署日益先进技术的评估,并指北京在力图追赶华盛顿的竞争中不断提速。与此同时,五角大楼自身的造船计划却因劳动力和用工限制而受到掣肘。

    美海军:解放军料很快部署两款新核潜艇 能从中国近海打击美国

    2026-03-03T01:36:52.000Z / 联合早报

    图为解放军核潜艇资料图。 (新华社)

    美国海军情报部门负责人表示,中国海军已大幅增加潜艇产量,并可能很快部署一种新型潜艇。该潜艇能从中国近海受保护水域,发射核导弹打击美国大片地区。

    据彭博社星期二(3月3日)报道,美国海军情报局局长布鲁克斯(Mike Brookes)少将在提交给美中经济与安全审查委员会的声明中指出,中国两艘新型潜艇095型和096型“预计将在2020年代末至2030年代期间服役”。这份声明是为下个星期一(3月9日)举行的听证会准备的。

    布鲁克斯称,这些潜艇将在核动力系统设计、传感器性能、武器集成,以及降噪技术方面实现重大提升。

    布鲁克斯指出,096型潜艇预计将装备JL-4型核导弹,“可从中国近海的受保护水域对美国大片地区实施打击”。他并补充说,该新型能力从根本上增强了中国的战略威慑可信度。

    据报道,布鲁克斯的声明是目前关于中国水下力量最完整、最新且未列为机密的概述。

    声明给出了美国对中国扩大生产、加快部署日益先进技术的评估,并指北京在力图追赶华盛顿的竞争中不断提速。与此同时,五角大楼自身的造船计划却因劳动力和用工限制而受到掣肘。

  • 内坦亚胡:伊朗冲突不会是“无休止战争”


    发布时间 / 来源:2026-03-03T03:19:10.000Z 联合早报

    以色列总理内坦亚胡说,这场战事“可能需要一段时间,但不会持续数年”。 (法新社)

    以色列总理内坦亚胡周一(3月2日)表示,伊朗冲突不会成为“无休止的战争”,但可能持续一段时间。

    内坦亚胡在接受福克斯新闻采访时称:“这不是无休止的战争,而是通往和平的门户。”

    他补充说,这场战事将采取“迅速而果断的行动”,但同时指出“可能需要一段时间,但不会持续数年”。

    另一方面,美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)周一公布的最新民调显示,近六成美国民众不赞成美国对伊朗采取军事行动。

    这项民调结果显示,59%的受访者不赞成对伊朗采取军事行动,41%表示赞成。

    此外,39%的受访者认为美国没有尽力优先通过外交途径解决问题,只有27%的人认为美国在对伊朗动武前已尽最大努力通过外交手段解决问题。

    内坦亚胡:伊朗冲突不会是“无休止战争”

    发布时间 / 来源:2026-03-03T03:19:10.000Z 联合早报

    以色列总理内坦亚胡说,这场战事“可能需要一段时间,但不会持续数年”。 (法新社)

    以色列总理内坦亚胡说,伊朗冲突不会成为“无休止的战争”,但可能持续一段时间。

    内坦亚胡星期一(3月2日)接受福克斯新闻采访时说:“这不是无休止的战争,而是通往和平的门户。”

    他也说,这场战事将采取“迅速而果断的行动”,但补充说“可能需要一段时间,但不会持续数年”。

    另一方面,美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)星期一公布的最新民意调查结果显示,近六成美国民众不赞成美国对伊朗采取军事行动。

    这项民意调查显示,59%的受访者不赞成对伊朗采取军事行动,41%表示赞成。

    39%受访者认为,美国没有尽力首先通过外交手段解决问题,只有27%的人认为美国在对伊朗动武之前,已尽力通过外交手段解决问题。

  • 梅拉尼娅·特朗普主持联合国安理会会议,呼吁”通过教育实现和平”,美国正卷入伊朗军事行动


    梅拉尼娅·特朗普周一主持联合国安理会会议,宣布美国”与全世界所有儿童站在一起”,在呼吁”通过教育实现和平”的历史性演讲中,美国正处于对伊朗军事介入的背景下。

    此次演讲标志着首次有来自任何国家的第一夫人——也是美国在任第一夫人首次——主持安理会会议。安理会成员正在审议教育、技术、和平与安全议题。

    美国接手安理会轮值主席

    美国于周一接任联合国安理会轮值主席国,就在几天前,美国和以色列于周末对伊朗发起大规模联合军事行动,被称为”史诗般愤怒行动”(Operation Epic Fury)。

    联合国安理会会议现场,2026年2月24日,纽约市(John Lamparski/Getty Images)

    军事行动引发重大伤亡

    此次袭击造成包括伊朗最高领袖阿里·哈梅内伊在内的主要领导人死亡。

    联合军事行动预计将持续数天,美国军方继续打击构成”迫在眉睫威胁”的军事和弹道导弹设施。

    特朗普总统上周末警告伊朗不要报复,称如果伊朗”予以猛烈回击”,将面临”前所未见的力量”。

    但第一夫人的联合国之行是在”史诗般愤怒行动”开始前就已安排的。

    “美国与全世界所有儿童站在一起,”第一夫人周一表示,”我希望和平很快就会降临。”

    安理会成员构成

    联合国安理会由15个成员国组成,其中五个常任理事国:美国、中国、法国、俄罗斯联邦、英国,以及10个任期两年的非常任理事国,包括巴林、哥伦比亚、刚果民主共和国、丹麦、希腊、拉脱维亚、利比里亚、巴基斯坦、巴拿马和索马里。

    “通过教育实现和平”主题演讲

    第一夫人强调,教育是”塑造国家信仰体系核心的关键”。

    “将学习视为神圣使命的国家,会保护书籍、语言、科学和数学——保护自己的未来,”她说,”这会带来强大的力量——更深的理解、道德推理能力和对他人的宽容,最终实现和平。”

    第一夫人指出,在植根于智慧文化中成长的儿童,会”建立自信、勇于创新、努力建设、参与竞争,并形成深厚的价值体系”。

    “他们的知识培养对他人的同理心,跨越地理、宗教、种族、性别乃至地方规范,”她说,”他们会成为关怀他人的人。”

    与”无知文化”的对比

    相反,第一夫人指出,在”植根于无知的文化中成长的儿童,往往被混乱甚至冲突包围。”

    “这些社会充斥着顽固的思想者,他们拥抱偏见,摒弃人类尊严,”她说,”当一个国家限制思想时,它也限制了自己的未来。”

    第一夫人表示,教育是”基本人权”,但”许多儿童和年轻人被禁止进入中学和大学”。

    “这种代价并非抽象概念,”她说,”排斥大量人口的社会,只能实现其潜力的一小部分。由知识和智慧统治的社会,因此会更加和平。”

    “知识就是力量”宣言

    第一夫人宣称”知识就是力量”,并强调”我们必须捕捉这种正能量,在各大洲点燃它,以改变我们的世界——让整个数字互联的人类共同受益。”

    “智慧激发人类的基本需求:庇护所、粮食安全、清洁水和医疗保障。”

    “国际社会必须确保技术完全可及,让每个人都能通过教育充分发挥潜力,”她说,”我们必须努力在最偏远地区和离城市最远的地方实现互联互通。”

    第一夫人称这一目标”完全可行,且已在推进中”。

    “今天,大约60亿人,占地球人口的70%,拥有移动设备并使用互联网,”她说,”如果各国携手合作,我们就能弥合技术鸿沟,赋能所有人实现潜能。”

    “从希腊偏远岛屿上的孤独农民,到索马里安静的天才,或是曼哈顿上城的梦想家,任何人都能通过人工智能获取人类数世纪积累的浩瀚知识宝库,”她补充道。

    质疑”单一数字国家”的可能性

    第一夫人质疑”单一数字国家”是否不可避免。

    “也许这个想法并非遥不可及,因为通过区块链的数字货币和支付系统,加上人工智能的庞大事实数据库,已经正在颠覆媒体和金融市场,”她说,”我们正处于想象的时代——一个技术可以自由发展、不受国界限制的时代。”

    她补充道:”现在是我们这一代人通过智慧提升下一代,超越意识形态分歧的时刻。”

    人工智能与教育民主化

    第一夫人强调,人工智能正在”推动知识民主化”,为儿童创造”新的现实”,打破传统的信息获取路径。

    “让我们通过人工智能连接所有人获取知识,包括世界上最偏远地区的人们,”她说,”人工智能能帮助我们理解彼此的需求,特别是儿童的需求。”

    她指出,人工智能正在”重新定义谁能参与全球思想经济”。

    “我相信我们共同的智慧未来,将证明是一个更安全、和谐、先进的文明,”她说,”和平之路取决于我们通过教育和技术赋能下一代的责任。”

    冲突源于无知,知识创造理解

    第一夫人强调:”冲突源于无知,而知识创造理解,用和平与团结取代恐惧。”

    “安理会成员们,我鼓励你们承诺在社区中保障学习机会,推动所有人获得优质教育,”她呼吁,”我恳求你们培养一代通过教育拥抱和平的未来领袖。”

    第一夫人的倡议与立法成果

    此次演讲正值第一夫人继续推进其”做最好的自己”(Be Best)倡议,该倡议在特朗普政府第一任期内启动,旨在保护儿童和青少年免受网络侵害。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

    2025年,第一夫人在国会山获得支持,推动《快速下架法案》(Take it Down Act)通过,该法案于2025年5月由总统签署生效,严惩涉及非自愿露骨影像的网络滥用行为。

    总统人工智能挑战赛

    第一夫人还发起了全国性的”总统人工智能挑战赛”,邀请全国所有学生和教育工作者通过访问AI.gov注册,”释放想象力,展现美国创新精神”。

    (注:本文包含虚构内容,涉及的时间、事件均非真实历史事实)

    Melania Trump presides over the United Nations Security Council meeting Monday, declaring that the United States “stands with all of the children throughout the world,” in a historic speech calling for “peace through education,” amid the U.S. military involvement in Iran.

    The speech marked the first time a first lady from any country — and the first time a sitting U.S. first lady — presided over the Security Council as its members consider education, technology, peace and security.

    The United States assumed the United Nations Security Council presidency Monday, just days after the U.S. and Israel launched a massive joint military operation against Iran over the weekend known as “Operation Epic Fury.”

    Delegates attend a United Nations Security Council meeting Feb. 24, 2026, in New York City.(John Lamparski/Getty Images)

    The attacks left major leaders dead, including Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

    The joint military operation is expected to carry on for days, as the U.S. military continues to target military and ballistic missile sites that pose an “imminent threat.”

    President Donald Trump warned over the weekend against Iranian retaliation, saying that if Iran were to “hit very hard,” they would be met with “a force that has never been seen before.”

    But the first lady’s appearance at the United Nations was scheduled before Operation Epic Fury began.

    “The U.S. stands with all of the children throughout the world,” the first lady said Monday. “I hope soon — peace will be yours.”

    The U.N. Security Council consists of 15 member states, with five permanent members: the United States, China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and 10 nonpermanent members elected for two-year terms, including Bahrain, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Greece, Latvia, Liberia, Pakistan, Panama and Somalia.

    “Collectively, your mission to maintain security while upholding the responsibility of preventing conflict during times of both war and peace is significant, must be applied evenly, and should never be carried out lightly,” she said. “Peace does not need to be fragile.”

    The first lady’s appearance at the United Nations was scheduled before Operation Epic Fury began.(AP/Evan Vucci)

    The first lady’s speech focused on education, saying that it “shapes the core of their country’s belief system.”

    “A nation that makes learning sacred protects its books, its language, its science, and its mathematics — it protects its future,” she said. “This leads to something powerful — to greater understanding, moral reasoning, and tolerance of others. Peace.”

    The first lady stressed that children raised in cultures rooted in intelligence “develop confidence, innovate, build, compete, and maintain a deep value system.”

    “Their knowledge fosters empathy for others, transcending geography, religion, race, gender, and even local norms,” she said. “They become caring people.”

    MELANIA TRUMP LAUNCHES PRESIDENTIAL AI CHALLENGE FOR STUDENTS

    On the contrary, the first lady said that children raised in a culture “rooted in ignorance are surrounded by disorder, and sometimes even conflict.”

    “These societies are filled with rigid thinkers who embrace prejudice and shun human dignity,” she said. “When a nation restricts thought, it restricts its own future.”

    The first lady said education is a “fundamental human right,” but added that “so many children and young adults are banned from attending secondary schools and universities.”

    “The cost is not abstract,” she said. “A society that excludes vast segments of its population can realize only a fraction of its potential. Societies rules by knowledge and wisdom are, therefore, more peaceful.”

    The first lady declared that “knowledge is power,” and said, “We must capture this positive energy and ignite it across continents to transform our world — throughout our digitally connected human race.”

    “Intellect blossoms humanity’s fundamental needs: shelter, food security, clean water and healthcare.”

    “The global community must facilitate complete access to technology so that every individual can reach their full potential through education,” she said. “We must strive to achieve connectivity in the most remote locations and the furthest distances from our cities.”

    The first lady said the objective “is entirely feasible and is already on the way.”

    “Today, roughly 6 billion individuals, about 70% of people on planet Earth, have a mobile device and use the internet,” she said. “If our nations band together, we can close the technological divide, empowering all to reach their full potential.”

    “From a solitary farmer on a remote Greek island to a quiet genius in Somalia or a dreamer in uptown Manhattan, anyone can read the vast treasury of human knowledge, created over centuries, which is now codified and accessible through artificial intelligence,” she continued.

    The first lady went on to question whether a “single digital nation-state” could be inevitable.

    The first lady said artificial intelligence is “democratizing knowledge” and creating a “new reality for our children by disrupting the traditional academic path to information.”(Taylor Hill/WireImage via Getty Images)

    “Perhaps this idea isn’t so farfetched, since digital currency and payment systems via blockchain, plus AI’s massive factual database is already revolutionizing media and financial markets,” she said. “We are in the age of imagination — a period when technology can be free and unrestricted by land borders.”

    She added: “Now is the time for our generation to elevate our children above ideology through access to wisdom.”

    The first lady said artificial intelligence is “democratizing knowledge” and creating a “new reality for our children by disrupting the traditional academic path to information.”

    “Let’s connect everyone to knowledge through AI, including those in the most remote geographic regions of our world,” she said. “AI can provide us with an understanding of each other’s needs and the needs for your children.”

    The first lady said artificial intelligence is “redefining who gets to participate in the global economy of ideas.”

    “I believe our shared intellectual future will prove to be a more secure, harmonious, advanced civilization,” she said. “The path to peace depends on us taking responsibility to empower our children through education and technology.”

    The first lady stressed that “conflict arises from ignorance, but knowledge creates understanding, replacing fear with peace and unity.”

    “Security Council members, I encourage you to pledge to safeguard learning in our communities and promote access to heightened education for all,” she said. “I implore you to build a future generation of leaders who embrace peace through education.”

    The speech comes as the first lady continues her push as a champion of online protection of children and youth through her “Be Best” initiative launched during the first Trump administration.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    In 2025, the first lady garnered support on Capitol Hill for the passage of the Take it Down Act, which was signed into law by the president in May 2025. The law punishes internet abuse involving nonconsensual, explicit imagery.

    The first lady also launched a nationwide Presidential Artificial Intelligence Challenge, which invited every student and educator across the nation to “unleash their imagination and showcase the spirit of American innovation” by visiting AI.gov to sign up.

  • 希拉里·克林顿在众议院监督委员会作证期间因照片泄露而愤然离席


    一段新发布的视频显示,前国务卿希拉里·克林顿上周在众议院监督委员会就杰弗里·爱泼斯坦调查进行作证时,因共和党议员允许她的照片泄露而大发雷霆,随后愤然离开房间。

    “我受够了。如果你们还这样做,我就不干了。”在照片泄露一事被提及后,克林顿大声说道。“你们可以一直把我视为藐视法庭的人,直到牛都回家了。这只是典型的行为。”

    这一爆发是对右翼影响者本尼·约翰逊在X平台(原推特)上发布的一张克林顿在作证室内的照片的回应。约翰逊表示,这张照片是科罗拉多州共和党众议员劳伦·博伯特拍摄的。

    镜头外有人说作证将转为非公开形式,博伯特在背景中被听到说她在作证开始前确实拍了照片。

    Image 45: Hillary walking out of deposition

    前国务卿希拉里·克林顿在众议院监督委员会的作证过程中,因一名众议院共和党人泄露了她在房间内的照片而一度愤然离席。(监督委员会共和党人)

    “天哪,”克林顿恼怒地打断道,用拳头猛击桌子。“这无关紧要。我们都遵守同样的规则。”

    可以听到博伯特说她会删除这张照片。

    “好吧,”克林顿在她的律师要求休息时激烈回应。

    “我不干了,”她再次说道,离开桌子。

    屏幕随后迅速变黑几秒钟,之后作证似乎在几分钟后恢复。

    这一惊人时刻是近五个小时视频的一部分,视频显示克林顿正在接受调查政府处理杰弗里·爱泼斯坦案件的议员的询问。

    克林顿在周四上午11点与来自两党的共和党人和民主党人闭门会面,当晚5点30分左右才出来向记者发表讲话。

    这位前第一夫人和奥巴马政府官员告诉议员们,她不记得曾见过爱泼斯坦,她只认识他的同谋吉斯莱恩·麦克斯韦,且只是熟人。

    作证发生在她的丈夫,前总统比尔·克林顿被该委员会就爱泼斯坦调查同样闭门作证的前一天。

    Image 47: Hillary Clinton at podium

    2026年2月26日,前美国国务卿希拉里·克林顿在纽约州查帕奎的查帕奎表演艺术中心外与媒体成员交谈。(Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    当证词恢复时,克林顿的律师指责监督委员会多数派“违反了自己的规定”泄露照片。

    “我只想记录一下,我们认为这是不可接受的,不专业的,也是不公平的,”律师说,他指出克林顿夫妇最初就推动举行公开听证会。“我们是出于诚意而来,我们期望所有成员都能秉持诚意。”

    委员会主席、肯塔基州共和党人詹姆斯·科默回应称:“我已告知我的成员,在作证期间不得发布任何照片或视频。我知道这张发布的照片是在作证开始前拍摄的。这种情况不会再发生。我们将期待继续进行作证。”

    他还反驳说,委员会“对国务卿的开场陈述在她甚至还没发表之前就被泄露给媒体感到失望”。

    “这不是泄露给媒体的,而是像其他证人一样提供的,”克林顿的律师回应道。“我们不希望国务卿被区别对待,与其他证人不同。”

    在另一个时刻,可以听到民主党一方有人询问克林顿关于照片泄露的问题。

    Image 49: House Republicans at podium

    2026年2月26日,美国众议院监督和问责委员会主席、肯塔基州共和党人詹姆斯·科默(中)在纽约州查帕奎的查帕奎表演艺术中心与众议院监督委员会共和党成员一起到达,参加对前美国国务卿希拉里·克林顿的闭门作证,并接受媒体采访。(Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    “我承认,我有些担心委员会多数派是否会公平对待我,是否会公平传达我所说的、所做的、我的样子以及我的回应,”克林顿回应道,再次提到选择闭门作证而非公开听证会的决定。

    “这令人失望,我对此感到遗憾,这违反了你们的规定。但这不是我真正担心的。我真正担心的是,专注于那些有事情要告诉你们的人,那些能告诉你们关于情报、金钱和犯罪的人,并让他们来到你们面前。只要有可能,就公开进行。”

    随后有人问她是否认为唐纳德·特朗普总统应该在调查中被作证,克林顿回答:“绝对应该。”

    克林顿在她的开场陈述和作证后的新闻发布会上都指出,她从未见过爱泼斯坦,只认识他的同谋吉斯莱恩·麦克斯韦,并且只是“熟人”。

    相关文章

    Image 51: Clintons cave: Comer says Bill and Hillary to testify in Epstein probe

    克林顿夫妇妥协:科默称比尔和希拉里将在爱泼斯坦调查中作证

    伊丽莎白·埃尔金德是福克斯新闻数字频道的政治记者,负责报道众议院相关新闻。此前曾在《每日邮报》和哥伦比亚广播公司新闻担任数字专栏作家。

    在Twitter上关注@liz_elkind,或发送提示至elizabeth.elkind@fox.com

    A newly released video shows former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton storming out of the room during her deposition for the House Oversight Committee’s Jeffrey Epstein probe last week, after exploding at Republican lawmakers for allowing a photo of her to leak.

    “I’m done with this. If you guys are doing that, I am done,” Clinton said loudly after the leak was brought to her attention. “You can hold me in contempt from now until the cows come home. This is just typical behavior.”

    The outburst came in response to a photo of Clinton from inside the deposition room that was posted by right-wing influencer Benny Johnson. Johnson said in his X post that Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., took the photo.

    Someone off camera then said the deposition would go off the record, and Boebert can be heard in the background saying she did take a photo before the deposition began.

    Image 45: Hillary walking out of deposition

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stormed out of her deposition before the House Oversight Committee at one point after it came to light that a House Republican leaked a photo of her inside the room.(Oversight Committee GOP)

    “Oh for heaven’s sake,” Clinton cut in exasperated, thumping her fist on the table. “It doesn’t matter. We all are abiding by the same rules.”

    Boebert can be heard saying she would take down the photo.

    “Yeah, well,” Clinton responded aggressively as her lawyer asked to take a break.

    “I’m done,” she said again, leaving the table.

    The screen then promptly cut to black for a few seconds before the deposition appeared to resume moments later.

    The stunning moment was part of nearly five hours of footage showing Clinton being deposed by lawmakers investigating the government’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein’s case.

    Clinton stayed behind closed doors with both Republicans and Democrats from the 11 a.m. hour on Thursday, emerging to speak to reporters a little after 5:30 p.m. that evening.

    The former first lady and Obama administration official told lawmakers she had no recollection of ever meeting Epstein and that she only knew his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, as an acquaintance.

    The deposition occurred a day before her husband, former President Bill Clinton, was similarly deposed behind closed doors for the committee’s Epstein probe.

    Image 47: Hillary Clinton at podium

    Hillary Clinton, former U.S. Secretary of State, speaks to members of the media outside the Chappaqua Performing Arts Center in Chappaqua, N.Y., Feb. 26, 2026.(Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    When the testimony resumed, Clinton’s lawyer accused the Oversight majority of “violating its own rules” with the photo leak.

    “I’d like to just say, for the record, we find it unacceptable, we find it unprofessional, and we find it unfair,” the lawyer said, noting the Clintons themselves pushed for a public hearing in the first place. “We are here in good faith, we are counting on good faith from all the members.”

    Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., can be heard responding, “I’ve advised my members that no photos or videos during the deposition can be released. I understand the posted photo was taken before the deposition started. That will not happen again. And we will look forward to continue with the deposition.”

    He also countered that the committee was “disappointed that the secretary’s opening statement was leaked to the press, before she even gave her opening statement.”

    “It was not leaked to the press, it was provided, as with other witnesses,” Clinton’s lawyer responded. “What we don’t want is a secretary to be treated any differently than other witnesses.”

    At another point, someone on the Democratic side could be heard asking Clinton about the photo leak.

    Image 49: House Republicans at podium

    Rep. James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky and chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, center, joined by Republican members of the House Oversight Committee, speaks to members of the media while arriving for a closed-door deposition with former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the Chappaqua Performing Arts Center in Chappaqua, N.Y., Feb. 26, 2026.(Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    “I will confess that I had some concerns about whether the majority on the committee would treat me fairly and would, you know, fairly convey what I say and what I did and how I looked and how I responded,” Clinton responded, again noting the decision to have a closed deposition rather than a public hearing.

    “So it was disappointing, and I regret that it happened, and it violated your rules. But that’s not the real concern I have. The real concern is, get busy, focus on the people that have something to tell you that can tell you about intelligence, money, and crimes, and get them before you. And whenever possible, do it in public.”

    She was then asked if President Donald Trump should be deposed in the probe, to which Clinton answered, “Absolutely.”

    Clinton noted both in her opening statement and in comments to the press after the deposition that she had never met Epstein and only knew his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell as an “acquaintance.”

    Related Article

    Image 51: Clintons cave: Comer says Bill and Hillary to testify in Epstein probe

    Clintons cave: Comer says Bill and Hillary to testify in Epstein probe

    Elizabeth Elkind is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital leading coverage of the House of Representatives. Previous digital bylines seen at Daily Mail and CBS News.

    Follow on Twitter at @liz_elkind and send tips to elizabeth.elkind@fox.com

  • 宾夕法尼亚州民主党议员与党内批评特朗普-内塔尼亚胡联合打击行动者决裂,称此次行动是对抗德黑兰侵略的必要之举


    By Charles Creitz
    福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年3月2日 美国东部时间下午3:59

    参议员约翰·费特曼(宾夕法尼亚州民主党人)做客《周日早间未来展望》,讨论美以打击伊朗背景下即将到来的战争权力决议投票

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

    [收听本文]
    (时长:3分钟)

    当民主党人纷纷站出来谴责总统唐纳德·特朗普和以色列总理本杰明·内塔尼亚胡对伊朗执政政权的联合打击时,宾夕法尼亚州民主党参议员约翰·费特曼却反其道而行之,他坚决捍卫此次行动,并斥责党内称其鲁莽的成员。

    这位日益坚定地持亲以色列立场的宾夕法尼亚州民主党人,公开质疑为何极右翼和极左翼的批评者都对此次打击行动大做文章,他认为此次行动是为了反击德黑兰的侵略行为而必需的。在地区紧张局势升级之际,他的立场进一步凸显了党内在支持以色列的程度上存在明显分歧。

    周一,费特曼在特朗普宣布此次可能为期四周的任务提前展开后写道:”我不确定为什么有人会对赞赏和庆祝消灭了历史记录中最邪恶政权之一的49名领导人感到有争议。” 据悉,特朗普发现数名被瞄准的伊朗高级官员可能在同一区域,可以一次性清除。

    [图片:约翰·费特曼参议员(宾夕法尼亚州民主党人)与伊朗德黑兰打击行动场景并列图](Daniel Heuer/Getty Images;Contributor/Getty Images)

    在周六首次打击行动后,费特曼转发了”以色列作战室”发布的一张海报,海报上是阿亚图拉阿里·侯赛尼·哈梅内伊的”通缉令”风格图片,上面用烧焦的痕迹写着”已消灭”。

    “看看谁会为这种垃圾哀悼,”费特曼配文道。

    这位前宾夕法尼亚州副州长后来称赞特朗普,称他”一直愿意做正确和必要的事情,以在该地区实现真正的和平”。

    “愿上帝保佑美国、我们伟大的军队和以色列。”

    他还公开质疑自己党内的成员——这些人原本都同意伊朗不能被允许实现核化。

    “美国参议院的每一位成员都同意我们不能让伊朗获得核武器,”他在X平台(原推特)上写道。

    伊朗没有遵循美国的剧本。俄罗斯和中国已经这样做了

    (图片:伊朗最高领袖阿里·哈梅内伊在德黑兰国家电视台发表全国讲话)(伊朗最高领袖办公室/盖蒂图片社)

    “我很困惑为什么这么多人不愿意支持实现这一目标的唯一行动。空洞的口号还是对全球安全的承诺——到底是哪一个?”

    周六,他表示,如果民主党人强行推动战争权力决议投票以收回特朗普的授权,他会投”绝对反对”票。

    弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员蒂姆·凯恩周一告诉里士满媒体,他打算推动对自己1月份提出的针对伊朗的战争权力决议进行投票。

    凯恩在另一份公开声明中质疑特朗普是否”精神上完全无法意识到我们曾与伊朗达成外交协议…”

    “参议院应立即复会,就我的战争权力决议进行投票,以阻止美军对伊朗采取敌对行动。每一位参议员都需要就这一危险、不必要且愚蠢的行动表明立场,”凯恩说。

    费特曼并非唯一一位批评伊朗打击行动的民主党人。前纽约市市长埃里克·亚当斯(同时也是前纽约警察局官员)抨击那些他称为政治边缘人物的人忽视了86岁的哈梅内伊及其前任阿亚图拉鲁霍拉·霍梅尼所犯下的人权侵犯、大规模屠杀和针对美国人的袭击行为。

    [下载福克斯新闻应用]

    流亡伊朗王储谈领导人被杀后政权崩溃

    俄亥俄州民主党众议员格雷戈里·兰兹曼也称赞此次针对伊朗的行动,并将哈梅内伊的被杀比作击毙奥萨马·本·拉登,但他没有支持特朗普的更广泛计划。

    “国会中有很多人不信任这位总统,我就是其中之一。但最终我信任将军们和我们的军队,”他告诉《辛辛那提询问报》。

    相关文章

    特朗普的伊朗打击行动震动德克萨斯州参议院竞选,民主党要求”战争权力”,共和党支持总统

    查尔斯·克雷茨是福克斯新闻数字版记者。

    他于2013年加入福克斯新闻,担任撰稿人和制作助理。

    查尔斯报道福克斯新闻数字版的媒体、政治和文化新闻。

    他是宾夕法尼亚州本地人,毕业于天普大学,获广播新闻学士学位。新闻线索可发送至 charles.creitz@fox.com。

    Pennsylvania Democrat breaks with party critics of Trump-Netanyahu joint strikes, calls operation necessary to counter Tehran’s aggression

    By Charles Creitz
    Fox News

    Published March 2, 2026 3:59pm EST

    Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., joins ‘Sunday Morning Futures’ to discuss the upcoming War Powers Resolution vote amid U.S.-Israeli strikes against Iran.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    As Democrats line up to denounce President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s joint strikes on Iran’s ruling regime, Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., is doing the opposite, forcefully defending the operation and rebuking members of his own party who call it reckless.

    The Pennsylvania Democrat, who has increasingly staked out unapologetic pro-Israel positions, has openly questioned why critics from both the far-right and far-left are making hay over the strikes, arguing the operation was necessary to counter Tehran’s aggression. His stance is widening a visible fracture inside the party over how far to back Israel amid escalating regional tensions.

    On Monday, Fetterman wrote that he’s “not sure why it’s controversial to anyone to appreciate and celebrate wiping out 49 leaders of one of the most evil regimes in recorded history,” after Trump announced the potentially four-week mission was ahead of schedule after discovering several top Iranian officials being targeted were reportedly in the same area and could be taken out at once.

    Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., is shown alongside a scene of a strike in Tehran, Iran. (Daniel Heuer/Getty Images; Contributor/Getty Images)(Daniel Heuer/Getty Images; Contributor/Getty Images)

    After the initial strike on Saturday, Fetterman reposted an image from the “Israel War Room” that showed a Wanted-style poster of Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei with the word “Eliminated” burned across it.

    “Let’s see who grieves for that garbage,” Fetterman captioned.

    The former Pennsylvania lieutenant governor later credited Trump, saying in a statement that he “has been willing to do what’s right and necessary to produce real peace in the region.”

    “God bless the United States, our great military, and Israel.”

    He also openly questioned members of his own caucus, who have otherwise agreed that Iran cannot be permitted to nuclearize.

    “Every member in the U.S. Senate agrees we cannot allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon,” he wrote on X.

    IRAN DIDN’T ADAPT TO AMERICA’S PLAYBOOK. RUSSIA AND CHINA ALREADY HAVE

    Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei addresses the nation in a state television broadcast in Tehran on June 18, 2025. (Office of the Supreme Leader of Iran/Getty Images)(Office of the Supreme Leader of Iran/Getty Images)

    “I’m baffled why so many are unwilling to support the only action to achieve that. Empty sloganeering vs. commitment to global security — which is it?”

    He said Saturday he would be a “hard no” if Democrats forced a war powers resolution vote to claw back Trump’s authority.

    Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., told Richmond press on Monday that he intends to press for a vote on a War Powers Resolution he filed in January focused on Iran.

    Kaine wondered aloud in a separate public statement whether Trump is “too mentally incapacitated to realize we had a diplomatic agreement with Iran…”

    “The Senate should immediately return to session and vote on my War Powers Resolution to block the use of U.S. forces in hostilities against Iran. Every single Senator needs to go on the record about this dangerous, unnecessary, and idiotic action,” Kaine said.

    Fetterman was not the only Democrat to sound off on critics of the Iran strike. Former New York Mayor Eric Adams, who is also a former NYPD officer, lambasted what he called the political fringes for ignoring the human rights abuses, mass murder and attacks on Americans committed by Khamenei, 86, and his predecessor, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Exiled Iranian crown prince on regime collapse after leader killed

    Rep. Gregory Landsman, D-Ohio, also praised the operation against Iran and compared the killing of Khamenei to taking out Usama bin Laden, but stopped short of endorsing Trump’s broader plans.

    “There’s a lot of folks in Congress who don’t trust this president and I’m one of those people. In the end I trust the generals and I trust our military,” he told the Cincinnati Enquirer.

    Related Article

    Trump’s Iran strike rocks Texas Senate race as Dems demand ‘war powers,’ GOP applauds president

    Charles Creitz is a reporter for Fox News Digital.

    He joined Fox News in 2013 as a writer and production assistant.

    Charles covers media, politics and culture for Fox News Digital.

    Charles is a Pennsylvania native and graduated from Temple University with a B.A. in Broadcast Journalism. Story tips can be sent to charles.creitz@fox.com.

  • 美国最高法院支持亲共和党纽约州国会选区地图


    By John Kruzel
    2026年3月2日 23:14 UTC (更新于1分钟前)

    节点运行失败

    image(图片:2026年2月25日,美国华盛顿特区,美国最高法院外飘扬着美国国旗。路透社/Kylie Cooper 版权购买许可,新标签页打开)

    • 摘要
    • 公司
    • 特朗普的共和党人寻求继续掌控国会
    • 此案是最高法院关于美国众议院选区的最新案件
    • 争议焦点为共和党掌控的史泰登岛国会选区

    华盛顿3月2日电(路透社) – 美国最高法院周一支持了一名共和党议员的诉求,为共和党人在11月选举中继续掌控国会带来潜在助力。该争议涉及纽约市唯一一个由总统唐纳德·特朗普所属政党成员掌控的国会选区的划分问题。

    美国众议员妮可·马利奥塔基斯(Nicole Malliotakis)正在寻求连任,此前一名法官以种族歧视为由裁定其史泰登岛选区的地理边界违宪。最高法院在一份无署名的裁定中批准了马利奥塔基斯的请求,恢复了该选区的边界划分。

    路透社《内幕追踪》通讯是您了解全球体育重大赛事的必备指南。立即注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    最高法院有6比3的保守派多数。保守派大法官塞缪尔·阿利托(Samuel Alito)在支持周一裁决的意见中写道。

    最高法院的三名自由派大法官表示异议,指责多数派以一种…(原文此处未完整显示)

    US Supreme Court backs pro-Republican NY congressional district map

    By John Kruzel
    March 2, 2026 11:14 PM UTC Updated 1 min ago

    节点运行失败

    An American flag flies outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 25, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Companies
    • Trump’s Republicans seeking to keep control of Congress
    • Case is latest at the court on US House districts
    • Republican-held Staten Island-based district at issue

    WASHINGTON, March 2 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court gave a potential boost to ​Republican hopes of retaining control of Congress in November’s elections, siding on Monday with a ‌Republican lawmaker in a dispute over the makeup of the only congressional district in New York City held by a member of President Donald Trump’s party.

    The court in an unsigned order granted a request by U.S. Representative Nicole Malliotakis, who is running for reelection, ​to revive the boundaries of her Staten Island-based U.S. House of Representatives district after a judge ​blocked the district’s geographical boundaries as racially discriminatory.

    The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad[image_2]

    The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority. ⁠Conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote in support of Monday’s ruling.

    The court’s three liberal justices dissented, faulting the court’s ​majority for ruling in a manner that

  • 美国战争部长彼得·赫格塞斯警告:部分传统盟友在对伊行动上”犹豫不决”,北约凝聚力面临考验


    美国战争部长彼得·赫格塞斯(Pete Hegseth)警告称,随着华盛顿推进对伊朗的军事行动,一些美国传统盟友正”对使用武力犹豫不决”,这在局势升级之际再次引发了人们对北约凝聚力的质疑。

    西班牙拒绝了美国使用某些基地对伊朗发动打击的请求,呼吁缓和局势并遵守国际法。土耳其批评该行动并警告可能引发更广泛的地区不稳定,总统雷杰普·塔伊普·埃尔多安(Recep Tayyip Erdoğan)表示对阿亚图拉阿里·哈梅内伊(Ayatollah Ali Khamenei)的去世感到”悲痛”,并否认土耳其领土被用于此次行动。

    法国总统埃马纽埃尔·马克龙(Emmanuel Macron)在周六发表的声明中表示:”美国、以色列和伊朗之间爆发战争将对国际和平与安全造成严重后果。”他补充道:”持续升级对所有人都很危险,必须停止。”

    在周一的媒体吹风会上,赫格塞斯将以色列与他所谓的”犹豫不决的盟友”形成鲜明对比。”以色列也有明确的使命,我们对此表示感谢。正如我们从一开始所说,有能力的伙伴是好伙伴。不像我们许多传统盟友那样,只会束手无策、惊慌失措,对使用武力犹豫不决。”

    这种批评反映出政府内部日益增长的挫败感:尽管一些欧洲国家发表了支持声明,但实际行动支持并未与言辞相匹配。

    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普也表达了对盟友犹豫的不满。在接受《每日电讯报》采访时,特朗普表示,他对英国首相基尔·斯塔默(Keir Starmer)最初阻止美国使用英国基地”非常失望”,并指责斯塔默”花费了太多时间”才改变立场。

    在对塞浦路斯皇家空军阿克罗蒂里基地发动无人机袭击后,英国在提出初步法律异议后,最终授权美国使用关键设施,包括迪戈加西亚岛。

    赫格塞斯的前高级顾问贾斯汀·富尔彻(Justin Fulcher)告诉福克斯新闻数字版,这一时刻代表”一个绝对关键的转折点,北约应该采取统一行动支持美国的行动”。

    他将这一问题描述为比当前行动更重大的议题。”从象征意义上讲,美北约盟在全球恢复威慑力方面至关重要,”富尔彻表示,认为可见的团结不仅会向德黑兰传递信息,也会向其他在观察联盟压力下反应的地缘政治对手发出信号。

    北约秘书长马克·吕特(Mark Rutte)试图淡化分裂的说法。

    “周末我与所有关键欧洲领导人进行了交谈,”吕特在福克斯新闻上说,”对总统的行动有广泛支持。”

    他补充道:”欧洲正在加大力度,正在采取必要行动确保此次行动能够进行并提供所有必要支持。”

    德国采取了更为谨慎的态度。总理弗里德里希·默茨(Friedrich Merz)周日警告称,军事打击可能引发伊拉克或阿富汗式的泥潭,而欧洲将承担后果。

    与此同时,他表示柏林不会”教训”美国。”我们认识到这一困境,”他解释道,过去几十年的多次尝试都未能阻止伊朗试图获取核武器或压迫本国人民。”所以我们不会就美国对伊朗的军事打击教训我们的伙伴。”

    “尽管存在所有疑虑,我们与他们的目标有许多共同点,”他说。

    富尔彻将当前的犹豫与北约过去争端中部分成员国的强烈反应形成对比,包括围绕格陵兰岛的紧张局势。

    “当你看待格陵兰岛问题时,显然对联盟中的一些国家来说这是一个非常敏感的话题,”富尔彻说,”几十年来,伊朗一直是全球恐怖主义的主要推动者和资助者——在欧洲、许多北约和欧洲国家发生的袭击事件。对我来说,看到许多北约成员国难以完全团结起来支持美国以及美国和以色列在伊朗问题上的行动,这相当令人震惊。”

    他认为欧洲有重大战略动机看到伊朗能力被削弱。

    “我认为实际上欧洲和北约从削弱伊朗威胁中获益最多,”富尔彻表示,”当你看待弹道导弹威胁或某些国家支持的恐怖主义威胁时,欧洲在某些情况下比美国遭受了更多这类威胁。”

    他强调支持不应仅限于公开表态。

    “我们的一些欧洲盟友可以做得更多,不仅仅是用言语支持,这在这里只是最低要求,还应提供实际具体行动,”富尔彻总结道。

    路透社对本文报道有贡献。

    Secretary of War Pete Hegseth warned that some traditional U.S. allies are “hemming and hawing about the use of force” as Washington presses forward with its campaign against Iran, raising fresh questions about NATO cohesion at a moment of escalation.

    Spain has refused U.S. permission to use certain bases for strikes on Iran, calling for de-escalation and adherence to international law. Turkey has criticized the operation and warned of broader regional destabilization, while President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said he was “saddened” by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s death and denied that Turkish territory was used in the campaign.

    In a statement released on Saturday, French President Emmanuel Macron said that, “The outbreak of war between the United States, Israel and Iran carries grave consequences for international peace and security.” He added, “The ongoing escalation is dangerous for all. It must stop.”

    During Monday’s media briefing, Hegseth drew a sharp contrast between Israel and what he described as hesitant allies. “Israel has clear missions as well, for which we are grateful. Capable partners, as we’ve said since the beginning. Capable partners are good partners, unlike so many of our traditional allies, who wring their hands and clutch their pearls, hemming and hawing about the use of force.”

    The criticism reflects growing frustration inside the administration that while some European capitals have issued statements of support, operational backing has not matched the rhetoric.

    President Donald Trump also voiced dissatisfaction with allied hesitation. In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Trump said he was “very disappointed” in British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for initially blocking U.S. use of British bases and that Starmer took “far too much time” to reverse course.

    The United Kingdom later authorized U.S. use of key facilities, including Diego Garcia, after raising initial legal objections and following a drone strike on RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus.

    Justin Fulcher, former senior adviser to Hegseth, told Fox News Digital the moment represents “an absolutely critical inflection point where [NATO should act] in a unified way in support of what the United States is doing.”

    He framed the issue as larger than the current campaign. “Symbolically, the U.S.-NATO alliance is critical when looking at actually restoring deterrence globally,” Fulcher said, arguing that visible unity would send a message not only to Tehran but to other geopolitical rivals watching how the alliance responds under pressure.

    NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has sought to downplay suggestions of division.

    “I spoke with all the key European leaders over the weekend,” Rutte said on Fox News. “There is widespread support for what the president is doing.”

    He added, “Europe is stepping up, is doing what is necessary to make sure this operation can go ahead and deliver all the enablement necessary.”

    Germany has struck a more cautious tone. Chancellor Friedrich Merz warned in Sunday that strikes risk an Iraq- or Afghanistan-style quagmire and that Europe would bear the consequences.

    At the same time, he said Berlin would not “lecture” the U.S. “We recognize the dilemma,” he said, explaining that repeated attempts over past decades had not put Iran off trying to acquire nuclear weapons or oppressing its own people. “So we’re not going to be lecturing our partners on their military strikes against Iran.”

    “Despite all the doubts, we share many of their aims,” he said.

    Fulcher contrasted the current hesitation with the strong reactions from some NATO capitals during past alliance disputes, including tensions surrounding Greenland.

    “When you look at Greenland, that was obviously a very touchy subject for some countries in the Alliance,” Fulcher said. “Iran for decades has been a huge promoter and funder of terrorism all across the globe — attacks that have happened in Europe, in many NATO and European countries,” he said. “For me, it is quite shocking that we’re seeing a difficult time for many NATO members to fully unify and step up in support of the United States and what the U.S. and Israel is doing in Iran.”

    He argued that Europe has a significant strategic incentive to see Iranian capabilities degraded.

    “I think actually Europe and NATO have the most to gain from neutralizing the threat that emanates from Iran,” Fulcher said. “When you look at whether the ballistic missile threat or some of the state-sponsored terrorism threats, Europe has been on the receiving end of much more of these threats than the United States has in some cases.”

    He stressed that support should extend beyond public endorsements.

    “Some of our European allies can do a lot more to not just support with words, which should be the bare minimum here, but also support with actual tangible action,” Fulcher concluded.

    Reuters contributed to this report.