作者： root

Minnesota Dems unite to block Walz, Ellison impeachment push, sparking online outrage: ‘They’re panicking’

2026-04-16T14:48:12-04:00 / Fox News

The fraud scandal is estimated to have cost taxpayers up to $19 billion, according to reports

By Andrew Mark Miller Fox News

Published April 16, 2026 2:48pm EDT

‘Incompetence or dereliction’: Minnesota lawmaker rips Tim Walz as state fraud losses mount

Republican Reps. James Comer and Pete Stauber weigh in on federal investigation into massive Minnesota fraud scheme.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

4 min

Conservatives on social media erupted with outrage Thursday after Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota united to block a Republican effort to investigate further and impeach Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison.

A resolution taken up by the Minnesota House Rules and Legislative Administration Committee to launch an impeachment investigation and allow the committee to hold hearings, issue subpoenas and further investigate the massive fraud scandal was blocked after all eight Democrats on the committee voted against it, Fox 9 Minneapolis reported.

The lawmakers deadlocked 8-8 on a straight party-line vote.

“This is a fundamentally unserious proposal by a fundamentally unserious party who isn’t interested in governing,” Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party (DFL) Rep. Michael Howard said about the move.

COMER TO SAY TIM WALZ ‘ENABLED FRAUD,’ FAILED WHISTLEBLOWERS IN BOMBSHELL MINNESOTA HEARING

“Gas prices are rising because of Trump’s illegal war in Iran. Health care, housing and childcare costs are spiking. We have hospitals closing, yet this is what we’re going to do today? A bill that’s absolutely going nowhere, dead on arrival.”

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison testify before Congress.(Graeme Sloan/Getty Images)

On social media, conservatives blasted the Minnesota Democrats for not taking seriously the unfolding fraud scandal, which is estimated to have cost taxpayers a total of up to $19 billion.

“Despite years of whistleblower reports, dozens of hearings & local news stories, & court convictions, Democrats CONTINUE to block any investigation of Tim Walz,” Minnesota House Fraud Committee Chair Rep. Kristin Robbins, R-Minn., who is running for governor, posted on X.

“They protect each other to protect their political base. @amyklobuchar is just part of the protection racket.”

“Minnesotans lost $9B in taxpayer dollars to just 14 Medicaid programs under Tim Walz’s administration,” Townhall columnist Dustin Grage posted on X. “Today, every single Democrat in Rules Committee voted to block an investigation into that fraud. Absolutely disgusting.”

TAFOYA RIPS WALZ ‘DODGING’ ACCOUNTABILITY IN HEARING, UNVEILS PLAN TO FIGHT FRAUD: ‘FULL WEIGHT OF THE LAW’

Video

“Look at their campaign contributions,” Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis., posted on X.

“They’re panicked and don’t want anyone finding out how this was allowed to happen,” conservative influencer Eric Daugherty posted on X. “REMOVE WALZ FROM OFFICE and start the criminal proceedings for complicity!”

“You don’t block investigations into fraud unless you’re benefiting from the fraud,” conservative commentator Shawn Farash posted on X.

“When one party does not want accountability or transparency, When one party knows that massive fraud exist but refuses to investigate that fraud, the people must stand up and demand they be held accountable,” Jay Feely, a former NFL kicker who is running for Congress as a Republican in Arizona, posted on X.

AUDIO OF ELLISON MEETING WITH CONVICTED FRAUDSTERS RESURFACES AS LAWYER ALLEGES WALZ, AG SHARE BLAME

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz announced Jan. 5, 2026, he would not be seeking re-election at a press conference at the State Capitol in St. Paul, Minn.(Jerry Holt/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

“This is why all spending and every program at the federal level and state level should be on Blockchain for everyone to see.”

Fox News Digital reached out to Democratic leadership on the committee for comment.

Walz dropped his bid for re-election in January as pressure to address systemic fraud mounted. He testified in front of Congress months later along with Ellison in a fiery hearing that left conservatives unsatisfied over the answer to the question of what the two elected officials knew about the fraud and what they did to stop it.

Walz has rebuffed calls for him to resign, prompting Minnesota Republicans to take various actions to further investigate or impeach him.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Impeaching or removing either Walz or Ellison would be a difficult uphill battle for Republican lawmakers in Minnesota given the current makeup of the Minnesota Legislature. Impeachment requires a simple majority vote in the House.

However, the House is evenly split, making it nearly impossible for Republicans to pass articles of impeachment without significant Democratic defections or a major shift in control.

Removing an official from office requires a two-thirds supermajority vote in the Senate, where the DFL holds a narrow one-seat majority.

Andrew Mark Miller is a reporter at Fox News. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email tips to AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6387388302112

Army secretary praises general who was fired by Hegseth

2026-04-16 12:48 PM ET / CNN

By Haley Britzky

Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll testifies during a House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense budget hearing for the US Army, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on April 16, 2026.

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

Army Secretary Dan Driscoll strongly praised an Army chief who was fired earlier this month by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth but conceded that civilian leadership of the military gets “to pick the leaders that they want.”

“There is no person that has more respect for Gen. (Randy) George and his 42 years of service, his Purple Heart, his wife Patty, their grandkids, their kids. I adore them. And he was an amazing transformational leader,” Driscoll said during a House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee hearing on Thursday. “That being said, the civilian leadership, the design of our system is that they get to pick the leaders that they want, and we execute on those orders.”

Driscoll said he was in North Carolina for his kids’ spring break when he heard George “was asked to put in his resignation paperwork.” When they returned he and his family “drove straight to Gen. George’s house, we walked right in, and we all gave him a hug.”

Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George speaks during the POW/MIA National Recognition Day Ceremony at the Pentagon, on September 19, 2025.

Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP/File

Hegseth fired George earlier this month alongside two other Army general officers. CNN reported that senior Army leadership was caught off guard and learned of his forced departure at the same time as the rest of the Department of Defense.

CNN has reported that Hegseth and Driscoll have butted heads behind the scenes, as the defense secretary has grown increasingly wary of Driscoll — who is close with Vice President JD Vance — and paranoid that Driscoll would replace him.

“If Driscoll starts getting too prominent, or too favored, it makes it a lot easier politically to just let Hegseth go somehow or find an off-ramp,” one source previously told CNN.

George and Driscoll worked very closely together as the two senior-most Army leaders. George previously worked as the senior military assistant to former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. And while the role of senior military assistant is apolitical and considered to be given to highly-capable military officers, his proximity to Austin was considered a mark against him by Hegseth and his circle.

Gen. Chris LaNeve, who is now the acting chief of staff of the Army, served as Hegseth’s senior military assistant. Military and Pentagon officials speculated when Hegseth made LaNeve the vice chief of staff that he would ultimately replace George.

Repeatedly during the hearing on Thursday, lawmakers voiced support and admiration for George and his service. Republican Rep. Tom Cole, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, said he is a “huge fan” of George.

“I just want the record to reflect how much we regret. I personally regret at least, he’s no longer in active service,” Cole said. “He’s a real loss to us, in my opinion. But again, I’m sure the successor will be equally capable.”

Driscoll said on Thursday that LaNeve — who was sitting next to him — is “a patriotic American too, whose family is multi-generational service.”

“[W]hat I can say about Gen. LaNeve sitting beside me is …. his kids are in, serving now. He served 35 years, has led a lot of our most important formations. And what is so amazing about the United States Army is — and we’ve done calls with all of our leadership over the last week — the United States Army goes rolling along for the last 250 years,” Driscoll said. “We have amazing leaders all over the world who can step in at a moment’s notice and keep fighting for our Army.

Exclusive: US law enforcement raids offices of Houston fuel trader Ikon Midstream

2026-04-16 19:14:10 UTC / Reuters

By Stefanie Eschenbacher, Stephen Eisenhammer, Laura Gottesdiener and Shariq Khan

April 16, 2026 7:14 PM UTC Updated 54 mins ago

节点运行失败

Members of the Mexican navy patrol in a boat next to a refinery of Mexican state oil company Pemex as Mexico expands probe into cartel-linked maritime fuel-smuggling at key ports, in Ciudad Madero, Mexico, May 28, 2025. REUTERS/Daniel Becerril/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

• Summary
• Companies

• U.S. law enforcement executed a federal search warrant at Ikon Midstream’s Houston headquarters
• Company’s attorney said raid was triggered by Reuters’ October 2025 investigation into alleged fuel smuggling
• No arrests made; fuel trader’s attorney maintains Ikon Midstream engaged in no wrongdoing

April 16 (Reuters) – U.S. authorities have raided the offices of Ikon Midstream, a Houston fuel ​trader whose diesel exports are part of fuel-smuggling investigations in Mexico, two U.S. officials and a Mexican security official told Reuters.

The operation, in which law enforcement ‌executed a federal search warrant, occurred this week at Ikon Midstream’s Houston headquarters, two of the U.S. sources said. One of the sources said it targeted computers and documents. Reuters was unable to confirm the exact reason for the search or what materials were seized. The raid has not been previously reported.

The Reuters Power Up newsletter provides everything you need to know about the global energy industry. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The company’s attorney, Joseph Slovacek, confirmed that “U.S. Customs and Border Protection served a search warrant on Ikon.” He said law enforcement cited earlier ​Reuters reporting about Ikon Midstream as the reason for the search.

“The warrant was entirely the result of your October 2025 article, and your persistent attempts to have Ikon ​investigated,” Slovacek said in response to a Reuters request for comment sent on Thursday.

“No arrests were made because Ikon had not engaged in ⁠any wrongdoing,” he added.

Rhett Kenagy, Ikon Midstream’s chairman and chief executive, could not be reached for comment.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and Mexico’s presidency did ​not respond to requests for comment sent earlier on Thursday. The FBI declined to comment.

The operations of Ikon Midstream were detailed in a 2025 Reuters investigation into the alleged smuggling of fuel ​into Mexico. That report chronicled, using tanker-tracking data and trade records, how a shipment of diesel exported by Ikon Midstream in March 2025 aboard the tanker Torm Agnes made its way to Mexico. That shipment ended up in the hands of Intanza, a Mexican company suspected of being a front for the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), according to three Mexican security sources and a government security document reviewed by Reuters.

Intanza could not be ​reached for comment. Letters sent to the company by courier could not be delivered, and Intanza has no website, no publicly listed phone number nor any social media presence that ​Reuters could identify.

Smuggled fuel and stolen crude oil have become the second-largest source of revenue for Mexico’s cartels behind narcotics, according to the U.S. government, which has ramped up efforts to crack down on the ‌illicit trade ⁠alongside its broader attempt to combat the drug gangs. The Trump administration designated CJNG as a foreign terrorist organization in February 2025.

The October 22 Reuters report revealed how Mexican cartels earn billions of dollars annually by allegedly smuggling fuel mainly from the U.S. to Mexico, helped by U.S. players, some unwitting, others complicit. Import-export paperwork for these transactions is often incomplete or faked by smugglers.

The scheme boils down to a tax dodge: Diesel, gasoline and naphtha are claimed in trade paperwork to be lubricants to avoid the steep import duties that Mexico charges on those imported ​fuels, Mexican authorities say. The savings can amount ​to more than half a cargo’s ⁠value: $7 million in the case of the March 2025 Torm Agnes shipment, according to a Reuters’ calculation.

Denmark-based Torm, which manages the vessel, in September 2025 told Reuters that it had stopped doing business with Ikon Midstream in April of that year “based on what has come to light.” The ​company said at the time that it was not responsible for, nor involved in, completing customs paperwork for the shipments.

Following the publication ​of Reuters’ story last ⁠year, Mexico’s government said that it had expanded investigations into suspected fuel smuggling by unspecified companies and officials, including at three Mexican ports where Ikon Midstream delivered petroleum products in 2025, according to a government report posted to a Senate website in February.

Ikon Midstream repeatedly has denied wrongdoing. It sued Reuters for defamation on November 14 in Texas state court, contending the news agency made “categorically false” statements about ⁠its business in ​the October article. In a separate March 27 statement to Reuters, Ikon Midstream said it “conducted its business lawfully” ​and “we have never falsified any U.S. or Mexican customs document.”

Reuters stands by its reporting and strongly denies making any attempts to have Ikon Midstream investigated by law enforcement, a spokeswoman said.

Reporting by Stefanie Eschenbacher and Stephen Eisenhammer in Mexico ​City; Laura Gottesdeiner in Monterrey, Mexico, and Shariq Khan in New York; Additional reporting by Emily Green in Mexico City, Kristina Cooke in San Francisco and Jana Winter in Washington; Editing by Marla Dickerson

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Jackson publicly airs grievances with conservative colleagues over Trump-era rulings

2026-04-16 12:35pm EDT / Fox News

The Biden appointee used a Yale Law School speech to target the conservative majority’s shadow docket practices

By Ashley Oliver Fox News

Published April 16, 2026 12:35pm EDT

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson accused the Supreme Court this week of using unexplained emergency orders to hand President Donald Trump wins, warning the practice risks eroding public trust in the judiciary.

In a Yale Law School speech made public Wednesday, Jackson, a Biden appointee and frequent dissenter on emergency rulings, repeatedly called the Supreme Court’s use of the emergency docket “problematic” and argued the conservative majority’s decisions were sometimes “utterly irrational.”

The emergency docket, sometimes known as the interim or “shadow” docket, allows litigants to bypass typical court proceedings and seek immediate relief from the Supreme Court in the face of restraining orders and injunctions in the lower courts.

“Given the real world facts that a stay request asks the court to consider, the court’s stay decisions can, at times, come across utterly irrational,” Jackson said. “We cannot expect the public to have faith in our judicial system if, without clear explanation, we consistently greenlight harmful acts.”

JUSTICE JACKSON ACCUSES SUPREME COURT OF ENSURING TRUMP ‘ALWAYS WINS’ IN SCATHING DISSENT

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman on the nation’s highest court, speaks at the 60th Commemoration of the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing on Sept.15, 2023, in Birmingham, Alabama.(Butch Dill/Pool/Getty Images)

Jackson emphasized she was not seeking to “praise” or “bury” the emergency docket, but she warned its current use is straying from its historical role, which she said used to be more limited.

“There is a serious concern that the Supreme Court’s modern stay practices are having an enormously disruptive and potentially corrosive effect on the functioning of the federal judiciary’s usual decision-making process,” Jackson, who did not cite Trump by name during her remarks, said.

Jackson also argued the concept of equal justice was being cast aside because “savvy parties” knew how to bypass the lengthy court process and apply for emergency stays at the Supreme Court, unlike average people caught up in legal proceedings.

“If we are not careful, the emergency docket can and will become an end-run around the standard review process, a special avenue that certain privileged litigants can utilize selectively,” Jackson said.

SUPREME COURT EXTENDS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S $5 BILLION FOREIGN AID FREEZE AMID ONGOING LEGAL CHALLENGE

The Supreme Court building is seen in Washington, D.C.(AP/Jon Elswick)

Jackson contended that the modern-day use of the emergency docket “disrespects” lower court judges, allowing the high court to “routinely interfere with lower court cases,” a remark that comes as the Trump administration routinely blasts what it has described as “rogue” district court judges who have stymied the president’s agenda.

“A one-line stay grant that overturns a lower court’s contrary conclusion suggests that the judgment call was so easy that no deliberation or explanation is required, and that suggestion casts aspersions on the tedious work that our colleagues have done,” Jackson said.

The Trump administration has faced hundreds of lawsuits and adverse rulings in the lower courts. While the Department of Justice’s solicitor general’s office often does not elevate cases to the Supreme Court for emergency consideration, when it does, it has won most of the time.

BIDEN-APPOINTED JUDGE AT CENTER OF REPEATED CLASHES WITH TRUMP ADMIN ISSUES NEW IMMIGRATION BLOCK

John Sauer, then- special assistant attorney general at the Louisiana Department of Justice, speaks during a hearing.(Al Drago/Bloomberg)

Through the emergency docket, the Supreme Court has greenlit Trump’s mass firings and curtailed nationwide injunctions. The high court has cleared the way for deportations and immigration stops sometimes criticized as controversial. The justices have also found that the government can, for now, discharge transgender service members from the military.

But Trump has not won out all the time. The justices required the administration to give more notice to alleged illegal immigrants being deported under the Alien Enemies Act and agreed with a lower court that the president improperly federalized the National Guard as part of his immigration crackdown in Chicago.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

In August, Jackson lashed out at the Supreme Court majority for “lawmaking” from the bench in a dissent to an emergency decision to temporarily allow the National Institutes of Health’s cancellation of about $738 million in grant money.

“This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this Administration always wins,” Jackson wrote at the time.

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House and Supreme Court’s public affairs team for comment on Thursday.

Ashley Oliver is a reporter for Fox News Digital and FOX Business, covering the Justice Department and legal affairs. Email story tips to ashley.oliver@fox.com.

Judge: Trump can’t claim that entire White House ballroom project is needed for national security

2026-04-16T16:49:39.021Z / CNN

By Devan Cole

Updated 48 min ago
Updated Apr 16, 2026, 3:23 PM ET
PUBLISHED Apr 16, 2026, 12:49 PM ET

A crane being used to construct the new White House ballroom is seen next to the White House, on April 5, 2026.

Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

A federal judge has again ordered President Donald Trump to pause construction of a massive new ballroom at the White House, rejecting the president’s “disingenuous” bid to circumvent an earlier ruling against the project by claiming that it needed to proceed for national security reasons.

The ruling Thursday from senior US District Judge Richard Leon is the latest development in a winding legal saga around the controversial ballroom, which the judge said last month was being built unlawfully since Congress hadn’t expressly approved it.

Leon, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, carved out an exception so that crews could continue working on a highly sophisticated bunker being installed under the proposed ballroom. But Trump had contended that the entire project was covered by that loophole since the above-ground structure “advances critical national-security objectives as an integrated whole.”

Leon forcefully rejected that argument in his latest decision, accusing the president of advancing an “incredible, if not disingenuous” reading of his earlier ruling.

“Defendants argue that the entire ballroom construction project, from tip to tail, falls within the safety-and-security exception and therefore may proceed unabated,” he wrote in the 10-page decision. “That is neither a reasonable nor a correct reading of my Order!”

“National security is not a blank check to proceed with otherwise unlawful activity, and belated assertions that the above-ground ballroom is ‘inseparable’ from an array of security features are not an occasion for this Court to reweigh the equities or reconsider the preliminary injunction!” Leon wrote.

The judge reiterated that crews could continue working on the bunker and could proceed with other work “necessary to ensure the safety, security, and structural integrity of the White House” and its grounds. But he made clear that absent congressional approval of the ballroom, no above-ground construction could continue except work to cover and secure the facilities being built underground.

The Justice Department has appealed Leon’s decision.

Anticipating the appeal, Leon delayed implementation of his ruling for one week. But he warned the White House that any above-ground work that happens during that period may need to be reversed depending on how the case plays out.

“I have no desire or intention to be dragooned into the role of construction manager,” Leon wrote, adding that he trusts the president to implement his order in good faith.

The decision comes several days after a federal appeals court in Washington, DC, instructed Leon to clarify the scope of his March injunction halting work on the nearly 90,000-square-foot ballroom.

The White House had asked the appeals court to shelve that ruling, arguing the entire project “advances critical national-security objectives” because the above-ground structure involves “the use of missile-resistant steel columns, beams, drone-proof roofing materials, and bullet, ballistic, and blast proof glass windows.”

“They also include the installation of bomb shelters, hospital and medical facilities, protective partitioning, and top-secret military installations, air conditioning, heating, venting, and more,” Justice Department lawyers defending the project in a lawsuit against it told the appeals court.

But the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which sued last year to block construction of the ballroom, has repeatedly said Trump is erroneously conflating the bunker with the above-ground addition.

“The lack of a massive ballroom on the White House grounds is not a national-security emergency. Its absence has not prevented any past president from residing in the White House during his tenure over the past two centuries, or from using the prior East Wing bunker for approximately eighty years,” the group told Leon in court papers filed this week.

“The defendants declare that the bunker needs ‘adequate above-ground cover,’ but never explain why only the President’s preferred 70-foot-tall ballroom – and not a simple at-grade slab – would suffice,” lawyers for the Trust wrote.

Carol Quillen, the president and CEO of the group, said in a statement that it’s “pleased the court upheld the preliminary injunction and halted above-ground construction of the White House ballroom until Congress approves the project.”

Trump on Thursday lashed out on social media, calling the move politically motivated and a threat to national security.

He argued in a Truth Social post that the White House lacks a large-scale event space that presidents have “desperately wanted and desired for over 150 years,” and said the planned ballroom is critical for hosting world leaders and major events safely.

Trump said that the ballroom would include extensive security features such as “Bomb Shelters, a State of the Art Hospital and Medical Facilities, Protective Partitioning, Top Secret Military Installations, Structures, and Equipment, Protective Missile Resistant Steel, Columns, Roofs, and Beams, Drone Proof Ceilings and Roofs, Military Grade Venting, and Bullet, Ballistic, and Blast Proof Glass.”

This story has been updated with additional responses.

Rep Ayanna Pressley used a discharge petition to force the vote, and key GOP members signed on

By Adam Pack, Fox News

Haitian national charged in brutal Florida gas station killing

An illegal immigrant from Haiti was charged with killing a female gas station clerk in Fort Meyers, Florida, April 3, 2026. (Fort Meyers Police Department)

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

3 min

A group of House Republicans defied President Donald Trump on Thursday to support shielding more than 350,000 Haitian nationals from deportation.

Ten GOP lawmakers joined Democrats and one independent to approve legislation that would allow Haitians to be eligible for the temporary protected status (TPS) program for another three years.

Those Republicans included Reps. Mike Lawler and Nicole Malliotakis of New York; Maria Elvira Salazar, Mario Diaz-Balart and Carlos Gimenez of Florida. Don Bacon of Nebraska; Rich McCormick of Georgia; Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania; and Mike Carey and Mike Turner of Ohio. Many in that cohort have large Haitian diaspora communities in their districts.

The TPS program allows foreign nationals whose home countries face humanitarian crises or dangerous conditions to temporarily live and work in the United States without fear of deportation. It does not provide a pathway to citizenship.

President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media outside the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., April 13, 2026.(Salwan Georges/Bloomberg)

SUPREME COURT TO HEAR TRUMP CHALLENGE TO PROTECTED STATUS FOR SYRIAN, HAITIAN NATIONALS IN US

The successful vote comes as the Trump administration has sought to revoke the TPS program for Haiti, arguing that conditions have improved in the country and that granting Haitians legal protections runs counter to American interests. The effort is currently stalled as the TPS termination works its way through the nation’s courts.

The measure is largely symbolic due to resistance from Senate Republicans who are not expected to hold a vote on renewing TPS for Haitians. Trump would almost certainly veto a TPS extension bill that clears Congress.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., a member of the “Squad,” used a legislative maneuver known as a discharge petition to force a chamber vote on the TPS extension bill. The effort would have been futile without the support of a handful of Republicans who signed Pressley’s discharge petition to reach the necessary 218 signatures and trigger a vote.

Rep. Laura Gillen, D-N.Y., sponsored the resolution on the House floor.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., listens to testimony from Minnesota lawmakers about fraud investigations in their home state during a hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 7, 2026, in Washington, D.C.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

JUDGE HALTS HOMELAND SECURITY PLAN TO END TEMPORARY PROTECTED STATUS FOR SOUTH SUDAN

The president has also spotlighted the killing of a Florida woman by a Haitian illegal immigrant earlier in April. The suspect, Rolbert Joachim, 40, reportedly received TPS status during the Biden administration.

“An Illegal Alien Criminal from Haiti, who was released into our Country by the WORST President in History, Crooked Joe Biden, and the Radical Democrats in Congress, just beat an innocent woman to death with a hammer at a gas station in Florida,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

“This one killing should be enough for these Radical Judges to STOP impeding my Administration’s Immigration Policies, and allow us to END THIS SCAM ONCE AND FOR ALL.”

Proponents of the measure argued that Haitians, who have been granted work authorization through the TPS program, have a positive economic impact on communities.

“I’ve heard from healthcare providers and business leaders across Nebraska who are concerned about the impact this would have on patient care and our economy,” Bacon, who is retiring, told Fox News Digital.

“I don’t see the goodness of deporting people who are here legally, who are working and who contribute to our country.”

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., came close to resigning over his anger with the Trump administration’s 28-point plan to end the war between Russia and Ukraine.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

But the majority of House Republicans have stood by the Trump administration’s decision to revoke the TPS program for Haiti.

“Members of Congress have a sacred and exclusive duty to our American constituents, not to foreign nationals,” Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., who is running for governor, told Fox News Digital.

Latest effort to rein in Trump on Iran falls short in House vote

April 16, 2026 / 1:58 PM EDT / CBS News

Washington— The latest vote in the House to block President Trump from taking further military action against Iran narrowly failed Thursday as the war approaches its third month and the off-ramp remains uncertain.

The war powers resolution, introduced by Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, failed in a 213 to 214 vote, with one voting present. One Republican voted with nearly all Democrats, just shy of the support it needed for passage.

It’s the latest test of Congress’ support for the war that Mr. Trump has claimed for weeks would be over “soon.”

Democrats in both the House and Senate stressed a renewed urgency to reining in the president’s authority on Iran after he threatened last week to eradicate a “whole civilization” unless the regime agreed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical channel for global oil trade. Since then, peace talks between the U.S. and Iran collapsed in Pakistan amid a fragile two-week ceasefire and the U.S. has placed a blockade on vessels using Iranian ports.

Last week’s episode, in which Mr. Trump threatened to attack Iran’s civilian infrastructure, prompted some Republicans to express unease, but had little effect on how they voted on the president’s war powers authority. A Democratic-led resolution in the Senate also failed in a Tuesday vote, with just one Republican supportive of it.

House Democrats tried to pass Meeks’ measure last week via unanimous consent during a brief pro forma session, but were blocked from even offering it as the presiding Republican quickly gaveled out of session.

Meeks’ resolution would have directed the president to remove U.S. armed forces from hostilities against Iran, unless explicitly authorized by Congress.

Three Democrats who voted against the last war powers resolution in early March — Reps. Henry Cuellar of Texas, Greg Landsman of Ohio and Juan Vargas — backed Thursday’s effort to limit Mr. Trump on Iran.Rep. Jared Golden of Maine was the lone Democrat in opposition.

“The cost of inaction was far too high to tolerate. But now it’s time to be done,” Landsman said in a statement last month announcing his switch.

Cuellar said his change of heart was not a rebuke, but a “reaffirmation of Congress’ constitutional role.” But he also attributed his decision to a lack of clear exit strategy and answers from the administration about its objectives.

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky also voted in favor, while Republican Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio voted present. Massie and Davidson were the only two House Republicans to break with Mr. Trump in the March vote.

Meeks said after the vote he expected Davidson to remain supportive. He told reporters, “I expected him to hold, but I’ll have a conversation with him now.” Meeks added that he’s been trying to flip Golden “for a period of time” and those conversations will continue.

In a statement, Golden said the resolution could undermine negotiations with Iran to end the war.

“The purported aim of this and other war powers resolutions is to stop the hostilities. Thankfully, the United States and Iran are currently in a ceasefire, and we are negotiating over critical questions of national security and international order,” he said. “At this moment, a resolution like this would weaken our hand.”

Some Republicans have indicated they could shift their votes if the war continues beyond the statutory 60-day deadline, which falls on May 1. The 1973 War Powers Resolution — which Congress passed in response to the Vietnam War as a check on the president’s power to enter armed conflict without consent from the legislative branch — capped any unauthorized engagement at 60 days. But the law has widely been viewed as unconstitutional by presidents from both parties.

Meeks said Thursday that he planned to file another war powers resolution.

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/white-house-insists-iran-peace-talks-will-continue-despite-rising-tensions-over-strait-of-hormuz/

How Trump and Hegseth are complicating the GOP’s pope pushback

2026-04-16T17:52:17.964Z / CNN

Analysis by

Aaron Blake

Updated 1 hr 31 min ago
Updated Apr 16, 2026, 2:37 PM ET
PUBLISHED Apr 16, 2026, 1:52 PM ET

Donald Trump Pete Hegseth Religion

Pope Leo XIV arrives at Bamenda Airport in Bamenda, Cameroon, on Thursday.

Patrick Meinhardt/AFP/Getty Images

Republicans have largely settled on a two-sided response to explain away President Donald Trump’s potentially blasphemous post depicting himself as Jesus, as well as his feud with Pope Leo XIV over the Iran war.

Trump’s now-deleted post was ill-advised, they concede. But also, the pope should stay in his lane.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday trampled all over those points — and reinforced that the Trump administration is the side blurring the lines between theology and politics, practically demanding a more direct clash with the pope.

That clash appears to be arriving, with Pope Leo increasingly sounding an alarm that the Trump administration is misappropriating God’s will.

In an Iran war briefing Thursday, Hegseth likened the media covering the war skeptically to Pharisees who plotted against Jesus — searching for an excuse to persecute him even as Jesus performed a miracle.

“I sat there in church and I thought, our press are just like these Pharisees,” Hegseth said.

Of course, for the metaphor to work, Trump would have to be Jesus. And this is now the third time in two weeks the administration has painted such a picture. Trump himself posted and later deleted an image of himself as Jesus, healing a sick man, and earlier this month his spiritual adviser Paula White-Cain likened Trump to Jesus at a White House Easter event.

And despite Republicans like Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Vice President JD Vance arguing that the pope should stick to theology while politicians stick to politics, the Trump administration appears increasingly bent on casting the Iran conflict as a holy war blessed by God.

That makes for an awkward argument: While Pope Leo shouldn’t judge wars, Trump and Hegseth are allowed to judge God’s will.

Here’s a brief recap (with a tip of the cap to CNN’s Zachary B. Wolf, who has been documenting this for weeks):

• Hegseth has said the military strikes are being “carried out under the protection of divine providence.”
• He has quoted a Psalm which says, “Blessed be the Lord, my rock, who trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle.”
• At a Christian service at the Pentagon recently, Hegseth cited imprecatory psalms — basically, prayers seeking God’s retribution against foes — which included asking for God to “break the teeth of the ungodly” and for God’s “overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
• At another service Wednesday, the Defense secretary recited a vengeful prayer he said was shared with him that appears to echo a notorious Samuel L. Jackson character’s monologue in “Pulp Fiction.”
• He on Thursday suggestively cited a pair of rescue missions of American airmen as “miracles, you might say.”
• Hegseth previously drew parallels between one of those rescues and Jesus’ resurrection.
• Trump has punctuated his own remarks by saying, “glory be to GOD.”
• And the president later wagered that God supports the war because “God wants to see people taken care of.”

The pope appears to have noticed this trend.

Mere minutes after Hegseth’s comments at the briefing Thursday morning, Pope Leo posted a pointed comment from a speech he had just delivered in Bamenda, Cameroon.

“Jesus told us blessed are the peacemakers,” the pope said. “But woe to those who manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic or political gain — dragging that which is sacred into darkness and filth.”

Indeed, the pope hasn’t been content just to criticize the Iran war; he has previously warned against invoking God’s will to justify it.

In his Palm Sunday address in late March, he referred to Jesus as someone “whom no one can use to justify war.”

“God does not bless any conflict,” he added last week. “Anyone who is a disciple of Christ, the Prince of Peace, is never on the side of those who once wielded the sword and today drop bombs.”

Mourners attend the funeral of a civilian killed in US-Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, on March 29.

Majid Saeedi/Getty Images

The Vatican said last week that the pope’s comments weren’t just about any one person. And indeed, there are plenty of examples of people waging war while claiming to do so on behalf of a god. It’s kind of a historical trend.

But it’s one that the Trump administration has clearly decided to resurrect in US foreign policy. And that has set up a war of wills between the Trump administration and the Catholic Church.

“The pope can say what he wants, and I want him to say what he wants, but I can disagree,” Trump told reporters at the White House Thursday.

The administration badly wants to pitch this war as a holy one — likely looking to garner more backing from a broadly skeptical American public, including lukewarm Trump supporters.

In fact, Hegseth has been speaking in such terms dating back to a book he published in 2020 called, “American Crusade.” In that book, Hegseth approvingly cited a pope having blessed the crusades.

“The pope, the Catholic Church, and European Christians chose to fight — and the crusades were born,” Hegseth wrote. “Pope Urban II urged the faithful to fight the Muslims with his famous battle cry on their lips: ‘Deus vult!,’ or ‘God wills it!’”

(You might remember the controversy over Hegseth’s “Deus vult” tattoo during his confirmation process last year.)

Hegseth concluded the paragraph by lamenting a papacy and a Catholic Church that bears little resemblance to the one from the days of Urban II.

“Europe was twice bailed out by America in world wars,” Hegseth said, “and the pope today leads interfaith services.”

These days, the pope seems quite anxious to at least partake in a rhetorical fight.

The administration’s decision to not just launch a thinly justified war, but to claim to be doing so with the blessings of God, appears to be spurring Leo to weigh in more forcefully. It’s one thing to go against God’s will, after all; it’s another to do so while claiming affirmatively that it is God’s will.

That means that Republicans who might have hoped this would be a one- or two-day story — and that they could put the pope in his place and move on — appear unlikely to get their wish.

And it might be time to come up with a new talking point.

This story has been updated with additional developments.

Judge faults Trump for ‘brazen’ bid to continue ballroom construction

2026-04-16 17:14:59 UTC / Reuters

By Jan Wolfe

April 16, 2026 5:14 PM UTC Updated 52 mins ago

节点运行失败

The construction of U.S.President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom continues in Washington, D.C., U.S., January 12, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

April 16 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Thursday again ruled that U.S. President Donald Trump’s plan to build a White House ballroom ​without congressional approval was unlawful, faulting the Republican president for asserting that ‌national security requirements demanded the project move forward.

In a 10-page order, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon modified the wording of an injunction he issued on March 31 that had ordered construction to stop, to address ​Trump and federal agencies’ “brazen” and “disingenuous” interpretation of that earlier ruling.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The National Trust ​for Historic Preservation, a nonprofit charged by Congress to help preserve historic ⁠buildings, sued the administration, asserting Trump exceeded his authority when he razed the historic White ​House East Wing last October and began construction of the planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom, which ​is costing more than $400 million and being funded by corporate donors.

Leon said he was clarifying the scope of his earlier order to stop “above-ground construction of the planned ballroom” but not “below-ground construction of national security facilities.”

The judge’s ​original March 31 order said much of the work needed to stop but that ​crews could continue “construction necessary to ensure the safety and security of the White House.”

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Trump and federal ‌agencies then ⁠asserted in court filings that the judge’s national security exception applied to the entire project because of elements of the ballroom like missile-resistant columns and drone-proof roofing.

The Trump administration also argued that the ballroom and a planned military bunker underneath it are a “single, ​coherent whole.”

Leon wrote in ​Thursday’s order that ⁠Trump and federal agencies “now seek to turn this exception on its head and unreasonably insist that the entire ballroom project may proceed.”

“I ​cannot possibly agree,” the judge wrote.

Trump on Thursday called Leon a “highly ​political” and “out ⁠of control” judge.

“The Ballroom is deeply important to our National Security, and no Judge can be allowed to stop this Historic and Militarily Imperative Project,” Trump said on Truth Social.

The ⁠National ​Trust for Historic Preservation had asked Leon to clarify ​his earlier injunction. After Trump appealed, an intermediate appeals court last week had also instructed Leon to revisit ​its scope, citing Trump’s arguments about national security.

Reporting by Jan Wolfe; editing by David Gaffen

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Harris stops in key presidential primary state after leaving door wide open to 2028 run

April 16, 2026 3:04pm EDT / Fox News

Harris told Rev Al Sharpton last week she’s ‘thinking about’ seeking the presidency again in 2028

By Paul Steinhauser Fox News

Former Vice President Kamala Harris is sparking more speculation about whether she will launch another presidential run in 2028 by making stops this week in a crucial presidential primary state.

Harris is in Columbia, South Carolina, on Thursday after making stops Wednesday in Greenville. For more than two decades, South Carolina has been one of the key early-voting states in the Democratic Party’s nominating calendar, and visits by potential presidential contenders generate buzz about their national ambitions.

The South Carolina swing by the former vice president comes less than a week after she dropped a tantalizing comment at the first major cattle call of Democratic presidential contenders.

HARRIS DROPS BIGGEST HINT YET ABOUT 2028

Former Vice President Kamala Harris is questioned by National Action Network founder the Rev. Al Sharpton, on April 10, 2026, in New York City.(AP)

“I might. I might. I’m thinking about it… I’ll keep you posted,” Harris said last Friday at the National Action Network’s 35th Anniversary Convention last Friday, when asked by the event founder, the Rev. Al Sharpton, if she would seek the presidency in 2028.

Harris, who replaced then-President Joe Biden as the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee but later lost the election to President Donald Trump, was greeted by the crowd with chants of “run again.”

The civil rights organization’s gathering gave Harris and eight other Democratic White House hopefuls an opportunity to speak directly to an influential group of Black leaders and activists who are key members of the Democratic Party’s base.

Black voters are also key players in South Carolina’s Democratic Party electorate. And Harris, the first female and Black vice president in the nation’s history, received a warm welcome when she arrived Wednesday at a South Carolina Democratic Party fundraiser and reception in Greenville.

HARRIS, NEWSOM, STIR 2028 SPECULATION AT MAJOR DEMOCRATIC PARTY MEETING

Former Vice President Kamala Harris speaks with patrons during a stop at Crave restaurant ahead of a South Carolina Democratic Party fundraiser on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, in Greenville.(Meg Kinnard/AP Photo)

Harris is holding a book tour event on Thursday for her memoir, “107 Days,” her look back at her abbreviated 2024 campaign.

Harris was mostly out of the headlines for a couple of months after the end the Biden administration. She began stepping back into the political spotlight last spring and summer, including headlining Democratic National Committee fundraisers.

Her decision last summer to pass on launching a 2026 gubernatorial campaign in her home state of California was seen as clearing the runway for a 2028 presidential bid. Her nationwide book tour has helped keep her visible while building email lists and boosting donor interest.

The former vice president’s current southern swing also includes fundraising appearances for the state Democratic Parties in Georgia and North Carolina, two crucial general election battlegrounds.

Harris narrowly lost both those states and the five other key battlegrounds to Trump in the 2024 election.

Pointing to Harris’ schedule, a veteran strategist in the former vice president’s political orbit recently told Fox News Digital, “Of course we are reading tea leaves.”

21 DEMOCRATS WHO MAY RUN FOR THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2028

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6393116414112

‘Dems are panicking’ over possibility of Kamala 2028

The strategist, who asked to remain anonymous to speak more freely, said, “No one knows what she is planning to do for 2028, but until she tells us herself, she is going to continue to travel, speak up about the issues she cares about the most.”

If she does run again in 2028, Harris would be considered one of the early frontrunners in what’s expected to be a crowded and competitive race for the Democratic nomination.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) is giving thumbs down to the White House hopefuls.

“Democrats are kicking off the 2028 primary by parading Kamala Harris and a roster of failed governors trying to outrun their own records,” RNC national press secretary Kiersten Pels told Fox News last week as she pointed to potential contenders who appeared at Sharpton’s convention.

Paul Steinhauser is a politics reporter based in the swing state of New Hampshire. He covers the campaign trail from coast to coast.