2026年6月4日 美国东部时间下午2:30 / 福克斯新闻
该修正案未获通过之际，代理司法部长托德·布兰奇曾承诺本届政府不会再推进这项反武器化基金
作者：亚历克斯·米勒
特朗普政府不再推进“反武器化”基金
“全明星”嘉宾在《特别报道》节目中讨论有关“反武器化”基金的决定
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章！
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/554b7ada-84e6-4b44-ba7a-120fd6534c52
收听本文
3分钟
参议院共和党人团结起来，反对永久废除唐纳德·特朗普总统近20亿美元的“反武器化”基金，尽管其党内对此存在大量批评声音。
共和党人与民主党人联手否决了北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯提出的一项修正案，该修正案旨在阻止该基金再次设立，并将相关资金转至国家欺诈基金。尽管参议院民主党人厌恶“反武器化”基金，但将资金转至他处的做法几乎遭到了全体民主党议员的反对。
不过，仍有12名共和党人投票支持该修正案，这表明他们对该基金以及政府未来可能推出的相关计划普遍持反感态度。
该修正案的失败可能会终结要求永久废除该基金的日益高涨的呼声，此事发生在参议院就共和党近700亿美元移民执法法案进行马拉松式投票之初，期间经历了数小时的拖延。
两党均将矛头指向特朗普的20亿美元基金，移民海关执法局拨款法案陷入危险境地
北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯对同僚表示，如果即将到来的预算和解法案包含给唐纳德·特朗普总统的舞厅项目拨款10亿美元，他将不会支持该法案。(安德鲁·哈尼克/盖蒂图片社；奇普·索莫德维拉/盖蒂图片社)
该基金于上月作为特朗普家族与美国国税局和解协议的一部分宣布推出，遭到了共和党人的强烈反对，他们担心如果没有适当的保障措施，2021年1月6日国会山骚乱期间袭警的定罪人员可能会动用这笔纳税人资金。
尽管如此，早已对该问题感到愤怒的共和党人并不买账代理司法部长托德·布兰奇的承诺——布兰奇称政府不会再推进该基金。
尽管布兰奇表示政府无意推进该基金，但周三在椭圆形办公室被问及该基金的命运时，特朗普的表态却截然不同，他告诉记者：“我得问问律师，我不知道。”
共和党推进移民海关执法局拨款法案，迫使特朗普争议性20亿美元基金退隐
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6397459411112
“在我看来，武器化基金是一件很棒的事情，”特朗普说，“我喜欢它，我认为它非常重要。”
蒂利斯表示，尽管听到特朗普发表了与布兰奇相反的言论，但他辩称，如果政府真的想要终止该基金，“为什么不利用这个机会将其正式写入法律呢？”
“否则，你就是在让我们每一位面临连任的议员陷入困境，他们不得不在今天到选举日之间处理这个问题，”蒂利斯说，“对于白宫表示不会推进、司法部也表示不会推进的事情来说，这毫无意义。”
共和党人感到反感，特朗普的10亿美元司法部“亲信基金”威胁到移民海关执法局及边境巡逻计划
参议院共和党议员、路易斯安那州参议员比尔·卡西迪在参议院卫生、教育、劳工与养老金委员会听证会上发言，2026年2月25日，华盛顿特区。(安德鲁·哈尼克/盖蒂图片社)
蒂利斯的修正案可能不会是共和党提出的最后一项相关修正案。路易斯安那州参议员比尔·卡西迪已于周四与新泽西州民主党参议员科里·布克联名提交了法庭之友意见书，抨击该基金，他也提出了一项修正案，以确保该基金不会死灰复燃。
但仍反对该基金的共和党人辩称，核心法案中并未涉及该基金，如果特朗普和政府试图重启该基金，应留待日后再处理。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
“有人说，‘哦，特朗普说不定哪天又会像昨天发言中提到的那样，设立武器化基金’，”肯塔基州共和党参议员兰德·保罗说，“那如果他真的这么做了，只要该政策不受欢迎，到时再处理就是了。”
亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道负责报道美国参议院的撰稿人。
Dozen GOP rebels fail to permanently kill Trump’s controversial $2B fund
June 4, 2026 2:30pm EDT / Fox News
The amendment’s failure comes after Acting AG Todd Blanche vowed the administration would no longer pursue the anti-weaponization fund
By Alex Miller
Trump administration not moving forward with ‘anti-weaponization’ fund
‘All-star’ panelists discuss the decision made on the ‘anti-weaponization’ fund on ‘Special Report’.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/554b7ada-84e6-4b44-ba7a-120fd6534c52
Listen to this article
3 min
Senate Republicans rallied against permanently killing President Donald Trump’s nearly $2 billion “anti-weaponization” fund despite heavy criticism among their ranks.
Republicans and Democrats shut down an amendment from Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., that would prevent the fund from ever returning and instead divert the funding to the nation’s fraud fund. Though Senate Democrats despise the “anti-weaponization” fund, diverting the money was a bridge too far for nearly the entire caucus.
A dozen Republicans voted for the amendment, however, signaling a broad distaste for the fund and any future plans the administration may have for it.
The amendment’s failure could put to bed the growing push to codify a permanent end to the fund and comes after hours of delays at the onset of the Senate’s marathon voting spree to pass the GOP’s nearly $70 billion immigration enforcement package.
BOTH PARTIES TARGET TRUMP’S $2B FUND AS ICE FUNDING PACKAGE ENTERS DANGER ZONE
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told his colleagues that he would not support the upcoming budget reconciliation package if it included $1 billion for President Donald Trump’s ballroom.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images; Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
The fund, announced last month as part of a settlement between the Trump family and the Internal Revenue Service, received strong pushback from Republicans who feared that without proper guardrails, people convicted of assaulting police officers during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot on Capitol Hill could access the taxpayer funds.
Still, Republicans who were already incensed over the issue weren’t sold on Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s vow that the administration would no longer pursue the fund.
Though Blanche said the administration wasn’t looking to move forward with the fund, Trump struck a different tone in the Oval Office on Wednesday when asked about the fate of the fund, telling reporters, “I’d have to ask the lawyers. I don’t know.”
GOP ADVANCES ICE FUNDING PACKAGE AFTER FORCING TRUMP’S CONTROVERSIAL $2B FUND INTO RETREAT
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6397459411112
“The weaponization fund, as far as I’m concerned, was a beautiful thing,” Trump said. “I love it. I think it’s so important.”
Tillis said that while he heard Trump’s comments that were “to the contrary” of Blanche’s, he argued that if the administration truly wanted to end the fund, “Why not use this moment to codify that?”
“Otherwise, you’re exposing every one of our members who are in cycle to having to deal with this between today and Election Day,” Tillis said. “And that makes no sense for something that the White House says they’re not moving forward, or the DOJ says they’re not moving forward.”
REPUBLICANS RECOIL AS TRUMP’S BILLION-DOLLAR DOJ ‘SLUSH FUND’ FOR ALLIES THREATENS ICE, BORDER PATROL PLAN
Chairman Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., speaks during a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on Feb. 25, 2026, in Washington, D.C.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Tillis’ amendment likely won’t be the last from the GOP. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., who on Thursday signed on to an amicus brief with Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., blasting the fund, also has an amendment to ensure it won’t return from the grave.
But Republicans who still disagreed with the fund argued that there was nothing in the underlying bill related to it, and that it should be an issue dealt with later on should Trump and the administration try to revive it.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“People say, ‘But, oh, Trump may someday again do the weaponization fund from his remarks yesterday,’” Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said. “Well, then address it if he tries to do it, if it’s unpopular. People can address it when it happens.”
Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.
发表回复