https://www.cbsnews.com/video/actor-james-van-der-beek-dies-at-48/
(注:用户提供的输入内容不完整,仅包含标题和部分URL,缺少正文信息。以上为根据现有信息生成的标题及保留URL的完整输出格式。若需完整翻译,请提供完整新闻文本。)
James Van Der Beek,
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/actor-james-van-der-beek-dies-at-48/
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/actor-james-van-der-beek-dies-at-48/
(注:用户提供的输入内容不完整,仅包含标题和部分URL,缺少正文信息。以上为根据现有信息生成的标题及保留URL的完整输出格式。若需完整翻译,请提供完整新闻文本。)
James Van Der Beek,
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/actor-james-van-der-beek-dies-at-48/
78岁的民主党人在司法部长的部分证词中被发现双眼紧闭
作者:阿什利·奥利弗
福克斯新闻
发布时间:2026年2月11日 美国东部时间下午2:46
纽约州民主党众议员杰里·纳德勒(Jerry Nadler)在众议院司法委员会关于帕姆·邦迪(Pam Bondi)的关键听证会上,部分时间被发现双眼紧闭,这导致观察者批评他在司法部长作证时睡觉。
78岁、已连任17届的纳德勒在邦迪作为司法部长(DOJ)掌舵后的首次小组委员会露面期间,在其开场陈述时被看到双眼紧闭。
该委员会共和党主导的X账号(原推特)分享了一段纳德勒闭眼的视频,配睡眠表情符号,并指出,当委员会最高民主党人、马里兰州众议员杰米·拉斯金(Jamie Raskin)发表开场讲话时,纳德勒似乎也打瞌睡。
邦迪听证会因议员指责民主党人搞”闹剧”陷入混乱
“别担心,@纳德勒议员。我们听腻了@拉斯金议员抱怨特朗普总统!”委员会共和党人在推特上写道。
另一位社交媒体用户分享了一段纳德勒闭眼的独立视频。
该用户写道:”纳德勒在今日司法部听证会上@AGPamBondi(帕姆·邦迪司法部长)的开场陈述中睡着。被工作人员叫醒#任期限制。”
保守派《Townhall》网站也发布了一张纳德勒”听证会现场被抓睡觉”的类似图片。
(配图:2026年2月11日,众议院司法委员会听证会上,杰里·纳德勒被发现双眼紧闭)(福克斯新闻数字版)
当轮到纳德勒质问邦迪时,他表现得很警觉,借此机会就司法部是否遵守一项要求其公布与杰弗里·爱泼斯坦(Jeffrey Epstein)性交易案件相关的所有未分类材料的法律,与她展开辩论。
拥枪权活动家安德鲁·波拉克(Andrew Pollack)在X平台上写道:”在众议院司法委员会听证会上睡觉,足以说明他对爱泼斯坦受害者的重视程度。”
(配图:2026年2月11日,帕姆·邦迪在众议院司法委员会听证会上作证)(汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ-滚石报,通过盖蒂图片社)
纳德勒曾担任众议院司法委员会最高民主党人,他于2025年9月宣布,在30多年的任期后将从国会退休。
纳德勒的办公室未回应置评请求。
阿什利·奥利弗是福克斯新闻数字版和福克斯商业频道记者,负责报道司法部和法律事务。故事线索请发邮件至ashley.oliver@fox.com。
Rep. Jerry Nadler closes eyes during Pam Bondi House Judiciary hearing | Fox News
Rep. Jerry Nadler mocked after appearing to doze off during Bondi hearing opening statements
The 78-year-old Democrat was seen with eyes closed during portions of the attorney general’s House Judiciary Committee testimony
By Ashley Oliver
Fox News
Published February 11, 2026 2:46pm EST
Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., was seen with his eyes closed during portions of a key House Judiciary Committee hearing featuring Pam Bondi, leading observers to pan him for sleeping as the attorney general was testifying.
Nadler, a 78-year-old 17-term congressman, was seen with his eyes shut as Bondi gave her opening statement as part of her first appearance before the panel since taking the helm of the DOJ.
The committee’s Republican-led X account shared a video of Nadler with sleeping emojis and observed that Nadler also appeared to doze off as Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the top Democrat on the committee, gave his opening remarks.
BONDI HEARING DEVOLVES INTO CHAOS OF SHOUTS AS AG ACCUSES DEMOCRATS OF ‘THEATRICS’
Rep. Jerry Nadler speaks to members of the media in New York on Oct. 3, 2025.(Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
“Don’t worry, @RepNadler. We are tired of listening to @RepRaskin complain about President Trump too!” the committee Republicans wrote.
Another social media user shared a separate video of Nadler appearing with his eyes closed.
Nadler “falls asleep during @AGPamBondi opening statement at today’s DOJ hearing. Gets awaken by staffer #TermLimits,” the user wrote.
The conservative Townhall posted a similar image of Nadler “caught sleeping” during the hearing.
MASSIE, KHANNA TO VISIT DOJ TO REVIEW UNREDACTED EPSTEIN FILES
Rep. Jerry Nadler was seen with his eyes closed during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Feb. 11, 2026.(Fox News Digital)
Nadler was alert when it came time for him to question Bondi, using the moment to spar with her over the DOJ’s efforts to comply with a law that required the department to release all unclassified material related to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking cases.
Gun rights activist Andrew Pollack wrote on X that “sleeping during the House Judiciary Committee speaks volumes about how seriously he actually takes the Epstein victims.”
Attorney General Pam Bondi testifies during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Feb. 11, 2026.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Nadler, who previously served as the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, announced in September that he would retire from Congress after more than three decades in office.
Nadler’s office did not respond to a request for comment.
Ashley Oliver is a reporter for Fox News Digital and FOX Business, covering the Justice Department and legal affairs. Email story tips to ashley.oliver@fox.com.
周二,共和党议员们闭门集会,试图为《保障美国选民资格法案》(SAVE America Act)规划前进道路。该法案是一项经过修订的选举完整性立法,长期以来在国会中被搁置。
由三位强硬派保守派人士——犹他州参议员迈克·李(Mike Lee)、威斯康星州参议员罗恩·约翰逊(Ron Johnson)和佛罗里达州参议员里克·斯科特(Rick Scott)——共同推动的这项立法,并要求参议院对其进行审议。
[image_1]
[image_2]
犹他州共和党参议员迈克·李(Mike Lee)正在推动参议院通过选民ID立法,并提出了共和党人可以采取的多种途径。(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
据参会议员描述,李议员在会上慷慨陈词,呼吁推进该法案。该法案要求选民出示身份证明,登记时必须亲自证明公民身份,并指示各州将非公民从选民名单中移除。
“参议院里没有一件事是容易推进的,”李议员在会后表示,“这件事当然也不例外。但如果我们想做这件事,就必须这样做。”
事实上,参议院民主党人不会支持这项立法。这意味着,目前60票的阻挠议事门槛是难以逾越的障碍。
[image_3]
怀俄明州共和党参议院多数党党鞭约翰·巴雷索(John Barrasso)希望共和党人继续推动选民ID立法,并指出在日常生活中出示身份证明的普遍性。(Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
怀俄明州共和党参议院多数党党鞭约翰·巴雷索告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,共和党人将继续强调选民ID问题的合理性,因为在日常生活的多个方面,身份证明的使用极为普遍。
“乘坐飞机需要带照片的身份证件。在橄榄球比赛上想买杯啤酒?你也需要带照片的身份证件。去图书馆,几乎做任何事情都需要照片身份证件,”巴雷索说,“现在你看到民主党人要求在他们参加的任何会议上都要有照片身份证件,我们在佐治亚州就看到了这种情况。”
[image_4]
但民主党人的反对以及温和派共和党议员莉萨·默科斯基(Lisa Murkowski)对该立法的否决,使得李议员等人向同僚们提出了两个选择——废除阻挠议事规则或转而采用“站席式”阻挠议事(即传统的冗长辩论)。
参议院多数党领袖、南达科他州共和党人约翰·图恩(John Thune)立即对前者泼了冷水。
[image_5]
佛罗里达州共和党参议员里克·斯科特(Rick Scott)表示,所有选项都在考虑之中,包括采用原始版本的阻挠议事规则来通过选民ID立法。(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
“不仅仅是我不愿意这么做。根本没有接近足够的票数——甚至一点都不接近——来废除阻挠议事规则,”图恩说,“所以这个想法虽然还在被提及,但没有未来。”
“那么有没有其他方法可以达到目的?我们拭目以待。”
特朗普在其第二任期内一直要求参议院共和党人废除阻挠议事规则,而共和党人目前正考虑转向“站席式”阻挠议事——这是在现代60票门槛出现前就存在的一种阻挠手段。
[image_6]
现代阻挠议事规则比“站席式”阻挠议事更容易启动,后者要求议员们在参议院进行辩论。这种方式可能会使参议院瘫痪数百小时。
斯科特告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,在会议期间,他的同僚们“开始理解”“站席式”阻挠议事的含义,但也指出并非所有人都已达成共识。
“我认为我们应该考虑所有选项,无论是‘站席式’阻挠议事还是其他方式,以确保选举安全,”斯科特说,“所以,我不会放弃。”
亚历克斯·米勒(Alex Miller)是福克斯新闻数字频道的记者,负责报道美国参议院事务。
Senate Republicans face long odds in advancing voter ID legislation, but they’re not backing down.
Huddled behind closed doors on Tuesday, GOP lawmakers attempted to chart a path forward on the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act, a revamped version of election integrity legislation that has long gathered dust in Congress.
A trio of hardliner conservatives — Sens. Mike Lee of Utah, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rick Scott of Florida — have championed the legislation and demanded it be considered in the upper chamber.
[image_1]
MURKOWSKI BREAKS WITH GOP ON VOTER ID, SAYS PUSH ‘IS NOT HOW WE BUILD TRUST’
[image_2]
Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, is leading the push in the Senate to pass voter ID legislation and is pitching multiple paths that Republicans could take to do it.(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Lee gave what lawmakers who attended the meeting described as an impassioned plea to move ahead with the bill, which would require voters to show identification, mandate in-person proof of citizenship when registering and direct states to remove noncitizens from voter rolls.
“Nothing in the Senate’s an easy move,” Lee said after the meeting. “This one’s certainly not. But if we want to do this, this is how we have to go about it.”
Indeed, Senate Democrats won’t support the legislation. That means the 60-vote filibuster threshold is, for now, an impossible barrier to breach.
REPUBLICANS, TRUMP RUN INTO SENATE ROADBLOCK ON VOTER ID BILL
[image_3]
Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., wants Republicans to keep pressing for voter ID legislation and noted how prevalent showing ID is in everyday life.(Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., told Fox News Digital that Republicans would continue to press the voter ID issue as common sense, given how prevalent identification is across several aspects of daily life.
“To get on an airplane you need a photo ID. You want to buy a beer at a football game? You need a photo ID. Go to the library, you need a photo ID for just about everything,” Barrasso said. “And now you see Democrats are demanding photo IDs to go to any meetings that they have, and we just saw that in Georgia.”
[image_4]
But Democratic resistance and moderate GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s rejection of the legislation leave two options, which Lee and others pitched to their colleagues — nuke the filibuster or turn to the standing, or talking, filibuster.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., immediately threw cold water on the former.
SCHUMER NUKES GOP PUSH FOR ‘JIM CROW-ERA’ VOTER ID LAWS IN TRUMP-BACKED SHUTDOWN PACKAGE
[image_5]
Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., said all options were on the table to pass voter ID legislation, including turning to the original version of the filibuster.(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
“It’s not just me not being willing to do it. There aren’t anywhere close to the votes — not even close — to nuking the filibuster,” Thune said. “And so that idea is something, although it continues to be put out there, is something that doesn’t have a future.
“So is there another way of getting there? We’ll see.”
In lieu of nuking the filibuster, which Trump has asked Senate Republicans to do throughout his second term, the GOP is considering turning to the standing filibuster, which existed before the modern 60-vote threshold.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
[image_6]
The modern filibuster is less strenuous than the standing filibuster, which requires lawmakers to debate on the floor. That route could paralyze the upper chamber for hundreds of hours.
Scott told Fox News Digital that during the meeting his colleagues were “starting to understand” the standing filibuster but noted that not everyone was on board yet.
“I think we ought to look at all of our options to get it passed, whether it’s the talking filibuster or whatever it is, to make sure elections are secure,” Scott said. “So, I’m not going to give up.”
Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.
分析: 艾伦·布莱克
更新时间: 2026年2月11日,美国东部时间下午4:34
发布时间: 2026年2月11日,美国东部时间下午3:33
周三,司法部长帕姆·邦迪在众议院司法委员会面前的证词,是我们迄今为止见过的特朗普内阁官员中最紧张、最具对抗性的证词之一。
邦迪出席听证会时,政府和司法部正面临一系列问题,包括他们对杰弗里·爱泼斯坦(Jeffrey Epstein)案件档案的处理、新报道的对六名民主党议员的起诉失败,以及上月联邦官员在明尼阿波利斯枪杀两名抗议者的事件。
以下是本次听证会的一些启示:
听证会初期,华盛顿州民主党众议员普拉米拉·贾亚帕尔(Pramila Jayapal)请在场的爱泼斯坦幸存者起立,并就一个棘手问题向邦迪发起质疑。
她要求邦迪(刚刚就虐待幸存者道歉)也为司法部未能对幸存者的敏感个人信息进行编辑而道歉。
邦迪停顿片刻,似乎在考虑下一步行动。但她没有道歉,反而转而指责她的前任司法部长梅里克·加兰(Merrick Garland)。双方的交流迅速演变为争吵和人身攻击。
这一幕颇具警示意义:司法部已承认存在这些编辑失误,而幸存者是最值得同情的群体。但邦迪却选择了对抗而非忏悔。
听证会的其余部分也延续了这种对抗性。邦迪全程极具攻击性,想尽办法回避民主党人和共和党众议员托马斯·马西(Thomas Massie)关于爱泼斯坦事件的提问,这种做法在政治上可能并不明智。
她还拒绝民主党人反复要求她回应身后的幸存者(他们表示司法部一直忽视他们),这一行为让场面显得十分尴尬。
她称一名民主党人为“过气的失败者律师”,斥责另一名议员攻击“美国历史上最伟大的总统”特朗普。
当邦迪声称“没有证据表明唐纳德·特朗普犯罪”时,来自加利福尼亚州的民主党众议员泰德·刘(Ted Lieu)指出,爱泼斯坦档案中一条未经证实的关于特朗普的线索(他称这算作证据),并指控邦迪作伪证,要求她辞职。邦迪则建议该议员应关注“加州的恐怖犯罪”。
当另一名议员再次敦促她考虑附近的幸存者时,她没有回应,反而指向倒计时时钟说:“你的时间到了。”
她多次打断提问者,以至于共和党司法委员会主席吉姆·乔丹(Jim Jordan)不得不反复提醒她,时间属于议员,而非她本人。
这似乎表明邦迪在向“唯一的观众”——特朗普——献殷勤,但这可能是以取悦真正希望得到答案的美国公众为代价。
毕竟,最近的一项民调显示,美国人对政府处理爱泼斯坦案件的不满比例约为3:1。
这种对抗性对邦迪而言或许司空见惯,但却显得不合时宜,仿佛她没有认真对待这一严肃问题。
如今,许多特朗普官员似乎在“服从他的命令”和“做看起来明智的事”之间抉择,邦迪周三的表现就是一个典型例子。
但邦迪不能只针对民主党人——毕竟,一些共和党人也对她和她的部门施压。
其中,与主导爱泼斯坦档案调查的马西的交锋,在实际揭露政府问题方面尤为突出。
这位肯塔基州议员指出了另一个重大编辑问题:政府似乎错误地编辑了一些被执法部门一度怀疑与爱泼斯坦有犯罪关联的男性。马西和来自加利福尼亚州的民主党众议员罗·卡纳(Ro Khanna)列举了其中六人,包括亿万富翁商业巨头莱斯·韦克斯纳(Les Wexner)。
(韦克斯纳尚未被指控犯罪,其代表称他“与执法部门合作,并被告知他‘在任何方面都不是同谋或目标’”。)
邦迪像政府其他官员一样辩称,韦克斯纳的名字在文件其他地方出现过。但马西称这是转移话题——司法部正是在他与爱泼斯坦犯罪关联的地方故意编辑了他的名字。
邦迪随后声称,政府在“40分钟内”恢复了韦克斯纳的名字,但马西准确指出,这是在他和卡纳指出问题之后才发生的。
“在我当场抓包后40分钟内,”马西澄清道。
邦迪随后称马西是“失败的政客”和“伪君子”。
尽管民主党人试图强调政府在这一问题上的失误,但邦迪常常通过回避问题和陷入争吵来混淆视听。
马西的这次交锋实际上取得了效果。
有那么一瞬间,议员们想起了一个越来越困扰他们所有人的问题——这带来了罕见的真正和解时刻。
来自加利福尼亚州的民主党众议员埃里克·斯瓦尔韦尔(Eric Swalwell)(他经常与亲特朗普的证人发生争执)转而讲述了他和家人面临的威胁。在详细说明后,他问邦迪这些威胁是否仍在调查中。
“我只是请求你的帮助来保护生命,因为我们现在所处的环境中生命受到威胁,”斯瓦尔韦尔说。
邦迪回应道:“他们正在调查,我可以提供更多细节。你们任何人都不应该受到威胁,你们的孩子和家人都不应该受到威胁,我会与你们合作。”
这段对话凸显了一个被忽视的大问题——议员们通常不愿谈论这个问题,但它显然影响了两党。这一次,双方在目标上达成了罕见的统一。
当然,两党在谁该为政治暴力负责的问题上也存在激烈分歧,这一问题在听证会的另一环节也被提及。
通常情况下,听证会会由委员会中证人的盟友引导,使其朝着更有利的方向发展,聚焦于对他们有利的问题。
但这次听证会中,这类问题却难以找到。
一些共和党人试图聚焦于拜登政府传票传唤共和党国会议员通话记录(共和党人将此比作“监视”他们)。
然而,听证会召开的前一天,我们得知特朗普政府对六名国会民主党人采取了更激进的行动——实际上试图起诉他们但失败了。这些人正是特朗普暗示应被起诉的对象。
邦迪在开场陈述中强调“保护民众安全”,引用了犯罪率显著下降的数据。乔丹在开场陈述中则聚焦于驱逐政策。
但这些议题似乎都已偏离政府的核心问题。上午早些时候发布的一项NBC新闻民调显示,特朗普在移民问题上的不支持率飙升至60%。此外,政府仍在处理其特工在明尼阿波利斯枪杀亚历克斯·普雷蒂(Alex Pretti)和蕾妮·古德(Renee Good)后产生的后果,这些事件也成为政府的重大负担。
这次听证会本应需要一场强有力的表现,邦迪可以直接回应这些问题并试图挽回局面。但她却没有这样做,而是选择“求生”。
邦迪一如既往地准备充分,试图回击议员们的质疑。但这种做法的弊端是,有时可能会适得其反。
听证会初期,邦迪令人费解地建议委员会中的民主党人应关注特朗普任内股市的上涨:
“道琼斯指数现已超过50,000点,标准普尔接近7,000点,纳斯达克屡创新高,美国人的401(k)养老金和退休储蓄蓬勃发展,”邦迪说,“这才是我们应该讨论的话题。”
民主党人迅速指出,股市通常不属于司法委员会的管辖范围。
听证会后期,她攻击来自佛蒙特州的民主党众议员贝卡·巴林特(Becca Balint)投票反对一项涉及反犹主义的决议。
但巴林特实际上是大屠杀幸存者的孙女。
巴林特在大声质问邦迪时指出了这一点,并恳求道:“你认真的吗?”然后愤然离开了听证会。
本文已根据最新报道更新。
5 takeaways from Pam Bondi’s fiery testimony
Analysis by Aaron Blake
Updated Feb 11, 2026, 4:34 PM ET
PUBLISHED Feb 11, 2026, 3:33 PM ET
Attorney General [Pam Bondi’s testimony] in front of the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday was some of the tensest and most combative testimony we’ve seen to date from a Trump Cabinet official.
Bondi came into the hearing with the administration and DOJ facing a series of problems, including their handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, the newly reported failed indictments of six Democratic lawmakers, and the killing of two protesters by federal officers in Minneapolis last month.
Below are some takeaways from the hearing:
Early in the hearing, Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington asked Epstein survivors in the audience to stand up. And she challenged Bondi on a difficult issue.
She asked Bondi, who had just apologized to the survivors for the abuse they suffered, to also apologize to them for the Justice Department’s [failures to redact survivors’ sensitive personal information].
Bondi paused, as if considering her next move. Then, rather than apologize, she launched into a deflection about her predecessor as attorney general, Merrick Garland. The exchange quickly devolved into arguments and personal attacks.
It was a telling moment. The Justice Department has acknowledged these redaction failures. And the survivors are some of the most sympathetic figures imaginable. But Bondi decided the moment called for combativeness, not contrition.
The rest of the hearing flowed from there. Bondi was extremely combative throughout, doing whatever she could to avoid Democrats’ and GOP Rep. Thomas Massie’s questions about Epstein — in ways that might seem politically unwise.
She also refused Democrats’ repeated entreaties to address the survivors seated behind her — survivors who said DOJ had ignored them — which made for some compelling visuals.
She called a Democrat a “[washed up, loser lawyer.]” She berated another for attacking “the greatest president in American history,” Trump.
When Bondi claimed there was “no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime,” Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu of California pointed to an unsubstantiated tip about Trump from the Epstein files — something he said counts as evidence — and accused Bondi of lying under oath and called for her to resign. Bondi suggested the lawmaker should focus on “horrific crimes in California” instead.
And when another lawmaker urged her again to consider the survivors sitting nearby, rather than responding she pointed to the expired clock, saying, “Your time is up.”
She talked over her interrogators so much that Republican Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan had to repeatedly remind her that the time belonged to the members, not her.
It seemed Bondi was playing to the “audience of one” — Trump. But that came potentially at the expense of appealing to an American public that really does want answers.
A recent poll, after all, showed Americans [disapprove about 3-to-1] of the administration’s handling of the Epstein files.
The combativeness was normal for Bondi, but it risked looking out of place and like she wasn’t taking a serious issue seriously.
So many Trump officials right now seem to be choosing between doing his bidding and doing what might otherwise seem wise. And Bondi’s performance Wednesday was a case in point.
But Bondi couldn’t just go after Democrats. After all, some Republicans have pressed her and her department on this issue.
And an exchange with Massie, the lead Republican behind the Epstein files effort, stood out when it came to actually pinning down the administration.
The Kentuckian pointed to another big redactions issue: How the administration appeared to [errantly redact some men] whom law enforcement at one point appeared to suspect of criminal activity with Epstein. Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California have cited six of them, including billionaire business magnate Les Wexner.
(Wexner has not been accused of a crime, and [a representative has said] he cooperated with law enforcement and was told he “was neither a co-conspirator nor target in any respect.”)
Bondi noted, as the administration has, that Wexner’s name appeared elsewhere in the documents. But Massie referred to that as a red herring — that the Justice Department happened to redact his name specifically where it was linked to possible crimes.
Bondi then claimed he administration un-redacted Wexner’s name “within 40 minutes.” But Massie accurately noted that only came after he and Khanna had called it out.
“Within 40 minutes of me catching you red-handed,” Massie clarified.
Bondi went on to call Massie a “failed politician” and a “hypocrite.”
While Democrats tried to highlight the administration’s missteps on this issue, Bondi was often able to muddy the waters by avoiding the question and getting into shouting matches.
Massie’s exchange actually landed.
For a brief moment, the lawmakers were reminded of an issue that increasingly inflicts them all. And it brought about a rare [moment of real comity].
Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California, who has often tussled with Trump-allied witnesses, instead focused on threats that he and his family have faced. After detailing them, he asked Bondi if they were still being investigated.
“I’m just asking for your help to protect life, because life is at risk with the environment we’re in right now,” Swalwell said.
Bondi responded: “They are being looked into, and I can give you more details on those. None of you should be threatened ever. None of your children should be threatened. None of your families should be threatened, and I will work with you.”
The exchange highlighted a sleeping giant of an issue — and one that lawmakers are often reluctant to talk about. But it’s an issue that clearly impacts both sides of the aisle. And for once there was some unity in purpose.
Of course, the two sides have also disagreed vehemently about who is more to blame for political violence — an issue that also came up at another point in the hearing.
The way these hearings usually work is that the witnesses’ allies on the committee try to guide things in a more favorable direction. So they’ll focus on issues that play to their strengths.
But those issues were hard to come by.
Some Republicans tried to focus on the Biden Justice Department having subpoenaed the call logs of congressional Republicans — which the GOP has compared to “spying” on them.
But the hearing literally came a day after we learned the Trump DOJ went a whole lot further with six congressional Democrats — actually [trying and failing to indict them]. These people were, yet again, people Trump suggested deserved to be prosecuted.
Bondi focused in her opening remarks on the idea of keeping people safe, citing significant [declines in crime numbers]. And Jordan in his opening statement focused on deportations.
But those too are issue that seem to have gotten away from the administration. An [NBC News poll] released earlier in the morning showed Trump’s disapproval on immigration spiking to 60%. And the administration is still dealing with the fallout from its agents having shot and killed Alex Pretti and Renee Good in Minneapolis — situations which have also emerged as major liabilities for the administration.
It was the kind of hearing that could seemingly have used a strong performance, where Bondi directly addressed the issues at hand and tried to right the ship.
But Bondi didn’t come to answer tough questions. She came to survive the hearing.
Bondi, as she has before, came loaded for bear to hit back at lawmakers.
But the downside of that approach is that sometimes you can miss.
Early in the hearing, Bondi rather puzzlingly suggested Democrats on the committee should instead focus on how much the stock market has surged under Trump.
“The Dow is over 50,000 right now, the S&P at almost 7,000, and the NASDAQ smashing records, Americans’ 401(k)s and retirement savings are booming,” Bondi said. “That’s what we should be talking about.”
The stock market is not usually the purview of the Judiciary Committee, which a Democrat quickly pointed out.
Later in the hearing, she attacked Democratic Rep. Becca Balint of Vermont for having voted against [a resolution involving antisemitism].
But Balint is actually the granddaughter of someone who died in the Holocaust.
Balint pointed that out while shouting at Bondi and imploring her, “Are you serious?” Then Balint stormed out of the hearing.
This article has been updated with additional reporting.
发布时间 / 来源:2026年2月11日 23:16 | 联合早报
一名在英国杀害伴侣并将其分尸后埋在花园的波兰女子,被判至少21年监禁。
现年40岁的波德沃尔纳(Anna Podedworna)于2009年与伴侣扎布洛卡(Izabela Zablocka)从波兰搬到英国中部德比市寻找工作。
隔年,年仅30岁的扎布洛卡与身处波兰的母亲和女儿突然断联,被申报失踪。
检方指,波德沃尔纳于2010年杀害扎布洛卡后,利用其专业屠夫技能将尸体剖成两半埋入花园,随后用水泥覆盖掩埋。
威廉姆斯法官星期三(2月11日)在德比刑事法庭宣判时,对坐在被告席的波德沃尔纳说:“从各方面来看,你之后的生活仿佛从未发生过任何异常事件一样。”
去年,在一名调查扎布洛卡失踪案的波兰记者到访后不久,波德沃尔纳终于向警方透露藏尸地点。
波德沃尔纳声称,她是在一次激烈争吵中出于自卫杀死扎布洛卡,但经过审判后她被判犯有谋杀罪。
威廉姆斯法官说:“你以如此方式残害伊莎贝拉(扎布洛卡)的遗体,却丝毫未表现出悔意……你是在愤怒之下杀死了那个你憎恨的伴侣。”
波德沃尔纳也因妨碍合法安葬和妨碍司法公正被判罪成。
波兰女子杀害伴侣分尸埋花园 判监21年
发布时间 / 来源:2026年2月11日 23:16 | 联合早报
一名在英国杀害伴侣并将其分尸后埋在花园的波兰女子,被判至少21年监禁。
现年40岁的波德沃尔纳(Anna Podedworna)于2009年与伴侣扎布洛卡(Izabela Zablocka)从波兰搬到英国中部德比市寻找工作。
隔年,年仅30岁的扎布洛卡与身处波兰的母亲和女儿突然断联,被申报失踪。
检方指,波德沃尔纳于2010年杀害扎布洛卡后,利用其专业屠夫技能将尸体剖成两半埋入花园,随后用水泥覆盖掩埋。
威廉姆斯法官星期三(2月11日)在德比刑事法庭宣判时,对坐在被告席的波德沃尔纳说:“从各方面来看,你之后的生活仿佛从未发生过任何异常事件一样。”
去年,在一名调查扎布洛卡失踪案的波兰记者到访后不久,波德沃尔纳终于向警方透露藏尸地点。
波德沃尔纳声称,她是在一次激烈争吵中出于自卫杀死扎布洛卡,但经过审判后她被判犯有谋杀罪。
威廉姆斯法官说:“你以如此方式残害伊莎贝拉(扎布洛卡)的遗体,却丝毫未表现出悔意……你是在愤怒之下杀死了那个你憎恨的伴侣。”
波德沃尔纳也因妨碍合法安葬和妨碍司法公正被判罪成。
发布/2026年2月11日 23:32
世界贸易组织总干事伊维拉说,在地缘政治紧张局势加剧之际,世贸组织必须紧急推进自我改革,并直言“维持现状绝非选项”。
(法新社)
世界贸易组织总干事伊维拉说,在地缘政治紧张局势加剧之际,世贸组织必须紧急推进自我改革,并直言“维持现状绝非选项”。
法新社报道,伊维拉(Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala)星期三(2月11日)说,当前“多边组织是否仍具现实意义”正引发广泛质疑,世贸组织已“处于关键转折点”。
这个负责监管全球大部分贸易规则的机构,正面临越来越大的改革压力。许多人认为,世贸组织的现行体系和架构已经过时,难以跟上快速变化的世界。
伊维拉在活动上发表讲话时强调:“我们这类多边组织必须顺应时代需求进行变革,通过改革适应时代发展。我认为,维持现状绝非选项。”
她在日内瓦世贸组织总部发表演讲时,援引人工智能和量子技术的发展速度指出“世界变化如此之快”,强调“如果组织不能适应,就会被时代淘汰。”
下月在喀麦隆举行的世贸组织部长级会议将以改革为核心议题。
立即订阅《联合早报》,洞察全球局势异动,把握世界经济发展脉搏,解锁国际热点评析。
—————————————-
*第一年S$59.40,第二年起每年S$118.80
世界贸易组织
改革
节点运行失败
节点运行失败
总干事伊维拉:世贸组织须紧急推动改革 | 联合早报
发布/2026年2月11日 23:32
总干事伊维拉:世贸组织须紧急推动改革
世界贸易组织总干事伊维拉说,在地缘政治紧张局势加剧之际,世贸组织必须紧急进行改革。 (法新社)
世界贸易组织总干事伊维拉说,在地缘政治紧张局势加剧之际,世贸组织必须紧急推进自我改革,并直言“维持现状绝非选项”。
法新社报道,伊维拉(Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala)星期三(2月11日)说,当前“多边组织是否仍具现实意义”正引发广泛质疑,世贸组织已“处于关键转折点”。
这个负责监管全球大部分贸易规则的机构,正面临越来越大的改革压力。许多人认为,世贸组织的现行体系和架构已经过时,难以跟上快速变化的世界。
伊维拉在活动上发表讲话时强调:“我们这类多边组织必须顺应时代需求进行变革,通过改革适应时代发展。我认为,维持现状绝非选项。”
她在日内瓦世贸组织总部发表演讲时,援引人工智能和量子技术的发展速度指出“世界变化如此之快”,强调“如果组织不能适应,就会被时代淘汰。”
下月在喀麦隆举行的世贸组织部长级会议将以改革为核心议题。
立即订阅《联合早报》,洞察全球局势异动,把握世界经济发展脉搏,解锁国际热点评析。
特别优惠
*第一年S$59.40,第二年起每年S$118.80
世界贸易组织
改革
节点运行失败
节点运行失败
2026年2月11日 美国东部时间下午5:34 / 路透社
作者:理查德·考恩
节点运行失败
美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市,2026年2月3日,联邦移民局特工在 Interstate 35W 高速公路上短暂拘留一名女子后,一名明尼苏达州警察与其坐在移民和海关执法局(ICE)车辆内的女子交谈。路透社/塞思·赫尔德 购买许可权,打开新标签页
华盛顿,2月11日(路透社) – 美国国会面临周五(美国东部时间)午夜的截止期限,以达成一项为国土安全部(DHS)提供资金的协议。国土安全部负责移民执法行动,而在特朗普政府的政策下,这些行动已在美国各地大幅加强。
以下是共和党人和民主党人正在艰难应对的五个棘手问题:
路透社《内部轨道》通讯是您了解全球体育界重大事件的必备指南。请在此注册。
参议院和众议院的民主党人希望移民和海关执法局(ICE)以及海关与边境保护局(CBP)的特工——尤其是在流动巡逻中的特工——摘下口罩,佩戴清晰可见的姓名和徽章标识。他们还希望特工佩戴随身摄像头,并将相关操作程序写入法律,确保在调查行为时可获取摄像头录像。
其他民主党要求包括:国土安全部官员进入私人财产前必须获得司法令状。
共和党人则认为,民主党提出的限制可能危及特工及其家人的安全,而民主党人表示,这些是警方和其他执法部门长期遵守的惯例。
民主党人表示,不再允许ICE或CBP特工在教堂、学校、医院、投票地点和法院附近徘徊,以试图抓捕移民。
民主党人认为,这些建筑必须立即允许被拘留者的律师进入,以防止美国公民被逮捕或拘留。他们还希望结束特朗普政府在国会议员根据监督权力视察拘留中心时设置的障碍。
民主党人关注的是保护公众免受他们认为过度激进的ICE和CBP行动的伤害,这些行动已导致两名美国公民死亡,并在全国各地城市引发日益强烈的公众反对。共和党人则专注于为联邦特工提供安全保障,使其能够按照总统唐纳德·特朗普的命令逮捕和驱逐非法移民。他们认为,这样做将使美国城镇和城市更加安全。
他们希望在一项644亿美元的国土安全部拨款法案中加入新条款,以惩罚
Explainer: Five things holding up a deal on US immigration operations
February 11, 2026 5:34 PM UTC / Reuters
By Richard Cowan
节点运行失败
A Minnesota state policeman speaks to a woman sitting inside an ICE vehicle after she was briefly detained on Interstate 35W by Federal immigration agents while they conduct immigration enforcement tasks in Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S., February 3, 2026. REUTERS/Seth Herald Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
WASHINGTON, Feb 11 (Reuters) – The U.S. Congress faces a midnight (EST) Friday deadline for a deal to fund the Department of Homeland Security, which is in charge of immigration enforcement operations that have ramped up across the United States under Trump administration policies.
Here are five difficult topics Republicans and Democrats are grappling with:
The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.
NEW CONTROLS ON HOW ICE AND CBP AGENTS OPERATE
Democrats in the Senate and House of Representatives want Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection agents — especially those on roving patrols — to shed their face masks and wear legible name and badge IDs. They also want agents to wear body cameras and procedures written into law making camera footage available during investigations of conduct.
Other Democratic demands include requiring judicial warrants before DHS officers can enter private property.
Republicans argue Democrats’ constraints could endanger agents or their families, while Democrats say these are long-held practices police departments and other law enforcement forces abide by.
NEW CONTROLS ON WHERE ICE AND CBP OPERATE
Democrats say no more ICE or CBP agents hanging out at churches, schools, hospitals, voting places and courts to try to nab immigrants.
TIGHTER ‘SAFEGUARDS’ ON DETENTION FACILITIES
The buildings must grant immediate access to detainees’ lawyers to prevent U.S. citizens from arrest or detention, Democrats argue. They also want to end impediments they say the Trump administration erects when members of Congress try to visit detention centers as part of their oversight powers.
REPUBLICAN DEMANDS FOR SAFEGUARDING FEDERAL AGENTS
Democrats focus on safeguarding the public from what they see as overzealous ICE and CBP operations that have seen the killings of two U.S. citizens and growing public backlash in cities throughout the country. Republicans are focused on providing safety for federal agents to carry out arrests and deportations of immigrants in the country illegally, as ordered by President Donald Trump. Doing so will make American towns and cities safer, they argue.
They want new provisions in a $64.4 billion DHS funding bill to punish
更新于:2026年2月11日 / 美国东部时间上午11:55 / CBS/美联社
周三,在意大利米兰科尔蒂纳冬奥会女子自由式雪上技巧项目中,美国队的伊丽莎白·莱姆利(Elizabeth Lemley)和杰林·考夫(Jaelin Kauf)分获金牌和银牌。
莱姆利以82.30分赢得了有8名选手参加的决赛。这位来自科罗拉多州韦尔的20岁选手将在米兰科尔蒂纳奥运会上首次亮相奥运赛场。
在颁奖仪式上,莱姆利的金牌丝带脱落,组委会承认已有“有限数量”的奖牌获得者遇到过类似问题。赛后新闻发布会上,莱姆利展示了她修复好的奖牌。
莱姆利在意大利利维尼奥的利维尼奥空中技巧与雪上技巧公园赢得女子自由式雪上技巧金牌后庆祝,2026年2月11日。路透社/汉娜·麦凯
考夫以80.77分卫冕银牌。这位来自怀俄明州阿尔塔的29岁选手在2022年北京冬奥会上也获得了银牌。
考夫的父母都是职业雪上技巧滑雪运动员。
“我妈妈一直是我最大的英雄和榜样,看着她如何面对生活并突破界限,”她在奥运会前接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示。
2018年金牌得主、法国选手佩琳·拉丰(Perrine Laffont)在周三的决赛中获得铜牌。
澳大利亚卫冕冠军雅卡拉·安东尼(Jakara Anthony)在决赛最后一轮失误滑倒,最终排名第八。
Team USA’s Elizabeth Lemley and Jaelin Kauf win gold and silver in women’s moguls at Winter Olympics
Updated on: February 11, 2026 / 11:55 AM EST / CBS/AP
Elizabeth Lemley and Jaelin Kauf won gold and silver for Team USA in women’s freestyle moguls skiing at the Winter Olympics on Wednesday.
Lemley won the eight-skier final with a score of 82.30 points. The 20-year-old from Vail, Colorado, is making her Olympic debut at the Milan Cortina Games.
During the medal ceremony, Lemley’s gold detached from its ribbon, an issue that organizers have acknowledged has been happening to a “limited number” of medalists. At a news conference afterward, Lemley displayed her repaired medal.
Elizabeth Lemley of Team USA celebrates after winning gold in women’s freestyle moguls skiing at Livigno Aerials & Moguls Park in Livigno, Italy, Feb. 11, 2026. Reuters/Hannah Mckay
Kauf repeated as silver medalist with a score of 80.77. The 29-year-old from Alta, Wyoming, also won silver in 2022 in Beijing.
Both of Kauf’s parents were professional mogul skiers.
“My mom has always been my biggest hero and role model, just watching how she’s just gone at life and done what she’s done, pushing the boundaries,” she told CBS News ahead of the Games.
Jaelin Kauf and Elizabeth Lemley of Team USA hug each other after their runs in the women’s moguls finals at the Winter Olympics in Livigno, Italy, Feb. 11, 2026. Reuters/Gonzalo Fuentes
Perrine Laffont of France, the 2018 gold medalist, took bronze in Wednesday’s finals.
Defending champion Jakara Anthony of Australia finished eighth after slipping on the last run of the final.
2026年2月11日 / 美国东部时间上午11:19 / CBS新闻
基辅报道 — 乌克兰领导人的一位顾问周三告诉CBS新闻,总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基(Volodymyr Zelenskyy)不打算在2月24日宣布即将举行总统选举,此前有报道称由于特朗普总统的压力,他会安排全国投票。
“没有任何迹象表明谈判进程会导致总统做出这一宣布,”这位不愿透露姓名的顾问表示。
《金融时报》早些时候报道称,泽连斯基确实计划在2月24日的讲话中宣布总统选举将于5月举行,这一天将是俄罗斯发动全面入侵四周年的纪念日。
泽连斯基上周在基辅告诉记者,特朗普政府正推动乌克兰和俄罗斯达成一项在6月前结束战争的协议。
泽连斯基与波兰总理唐纳德·图斯克在乌克兰基辅圣米迦勒大教堂外参观乌克兰阵亡者纪念碑墙,2026年2月5日。乌克兰总统新闻局/图片来源/路透社
“美国人提议各方在今年夏季初结束战争,并可能会根据这个时间表向双方施加压力,”泽连斯基表示。
特朗普总统有时会猛烈批评泽连斯基,包括一年前称他为“没有选举的独裁者”。但乌克兰政客指出,根据该国宪法,自俄罗斯发动战争以来实施的戒严令期间,无法举行全国选举。
战争持续期间乌克兰举行选举是否可行?
12月,特朗普总统在接受《政治报》采访时再次提出这一批评,指责泽连斯基“利用战争”来避免选举。
乌克兰领导人当时回应特朗普的评论称,如果美国和欧洲准备在俄罗斯持续进攻期间“确保乌克兰的安全”,选举可以举行。
在戒严令下,乌克兰已禁止大型公共集会,宵禁仍然有效,旨在保护平民生命。与此同时,俄罗斯致命的空袭没有减弱的迹象。
根据乌克兰组织Oko Gora +新闻与分析中心的分析,仅在1月份,俄罗斯就向乌克兰发射了创纪录的5,717枚炸弹和导弹。爆炸无人机袭击也持续不断。官员们表示,一架无人机在夜间击中了哈尔科夫地区的一处民宅,造成一名父亲和他的三个幼儿死亡,其怀孕的妻子受重伤。
乌克兰紧急情况服务局分享的照片显示,消防员在据称俄罗斯无人机袭击摧毁了乌克兰东北部哈尔科夫地区博霍杜希夫市佐洛乔夫村的一所房屋后扑灭大火,2026年2月11日。乌克兰紧急情况服务局/图片来源
除了安全风险外,专家表示,法律和后勤限制也使得战争期间举行选举几乎不可能。乌克兰国家安全与国防委员会秘书奥列克西·丹尼洛夫(Oleksiy Danilov)表示,戒严令下举行议会或总统选举均属非法。
战争还导致许多乌克兰选民流离失所,该国缺乏远程投票所需的基础设施。根据经济战略中心的数据,截至2024年11月,约有520万乌克兰难民在国外,而联合国国际移民组织估计另有300万乌克兰人在国内流离失所,也无法在当地投票站投票。
出于所有这些原因,乌克兰官员表示,在停火生效前无法举行选举。
许多人还认为,任何全国选举都应包含或伴随公民投票,让乌克兰人民支持或拒绝任何最终结束战争的协议条款,其中可能包括乌克兰做出领土让步,尽管泽连斯基迄今为止已排除这种可能性。
据总统办公室称,此类公投只有在超过半数的合格选民能够参与的情况下才有效。
“选举只是和平计划的一部分,”乌克兰总统顾问周三告诉CBS新闻,“我们将一起对和平计划的所有要点进行投票,我们不能单独挑选选举。”
Ukrainian official denies plan to announce elections soon despite pressure from Trump
February 11, 2026 / 11:19 AM EST / CBS News
Kyiv — President Volodymyr Zelenskyy does not plan to make an announcement about looming presidential elections on Feb. 24, an adviser to the Ukrainian leader told CBS News on Wednesday, after a report suggested he would schedule a national vote due to pressure from President Trump.
“There is no change in the negotiations track that would lead the president to make this announcement,” said the adviser, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
The Financial Times reported earlier that Zelenskyy did plan to announce presidential elections would be held as soon as May during an address on Feb. 24, the date that will mark four years since Russia launched its full-scale invasion.
Zelenskyy told journalists in Kyiv last week that the Trump administration was pushing Ukraine and Russia to agree to a deal to end the war by June.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, right, and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk visit the Wall of Remembrance of the Fallen for Ukraine, outside the Saint Michael’s Cathedral in Kyiv, Ukraine, Feb. 5, 2026. Ukrainian Presidential Press Service/Handout/REUTERS
“The Americans are proposing the parties end the war by the beginning of this summer and will probably put pressure on the parties precisely according to this schedule,” Zelenskyy said.
Mr. Trump has at times been fiercely critical of Zelenskyy, including in comments one year ago when he called him a “dictator without elections.” But Ukrainian politicians point out that under the country’s constitution, national elections cannot be held during martial law — which has been imposed since Russia launched its war.
Are elections feasible in Ukraine as the war continues?
In December, President Trump renewed that line of criticism, accusing Zelenskyy of “using the war” to avoid elections in an interview with Politico.
The Ukrainian leader responded to Mr. Trump’s comments then, saying elections could be held if the U.S. and Europe were prepared to “ensure security” in his country amid Russia’s ongoing assault.
Large public gatherings have been prohibited in Ukraine and curfews remain in place under the martial law measures intended to protect civilian life. Meanwhile,Russia’s deadly airstrikes show no sign of abating.
In January alone, Russia hit Ukraine with a record 5,717 bombs and missiles, according to an analysis by the Ukrainian group Oko Gora + News and Analytics. Explosive drone attacks have also been relentless. Officials said one drone hit a civilian home overnight in the Kharkiv region, killing a father and his three toddlers and seriously wounding his pregnant wife.
A photo shared by the State Emergency Service of Ukraine shows firefighters trying to put out the blaze after an alleged Russian drone strike destroyed a house in the village of Zolochiv, in the city of Bohodukhiv in northeast Ukraine’s Kharkiv region, killing a man and his three young children and leaving their heavily pregnant mother in critical condition, Feb. 11, 2026. State Emergency Service of Ukraine/Handout
On top of the security risks, experts say legal and logistical constraints also make holding elections during the war nearly impossible. According to Oleksiy Danilov, Secretary of the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council, it is illegal to hold either parliamentary or presidential elections under martial law.
The war has also driven many Ukrainian voters out of the country, and there’s little infrastructure in place to enable remote voting. As of November 2024, there were some 5.2 million Ukrainian refugees abroad, according to the Center for Economic Strategy, while United Nation’s International Organization for Migration estimates an additional 3 million Ukrainians are internally displaced and would also be unable to vote at local polling stations.
For all those reasons, Ukrainian officials say elections cannot be held before a ceasefire comes into effect.
Many also argue that any national election should include or accompany a referendum for the Ukrainian people to back — or reject — the terms of any eventual deal to end the war, which could include Ukraine making territorial concessions, though Zelenskyy has thus far ruled that out.
According to the president’s office, such a referendum would only be valid if more than half of the country’s eligible voters are able to participate.
“Elections are just one part of a peace plan,” the Ukrainian presidential adviser told CBS News on Wednesday. “We will vote on all points of the peace plan together, and we cannot cherry pick elections separately.”
2026年2月11日 / 美国东部时间上午11:44 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
米兰—周二,当马克西姆·瑙莫夫(Maxim Naumov)踏上2026年米兰冬奥会的奥运冰面时,他并非孤身一人。
当音乐响起,灯光映照冰场,这位24岁的美国滑冰选手正在实现一个他与父母——前奥运双人滑选手叶夫根尼娅·希什科娃(Evgenia Shishkova)和瓦季姆·瑙莫夫(Vadim Naumov)——共同的梦想。他们两人去年在波托马克河上空的空中碰撞事故中不幸遇难。
“那是他们三人共同的梦想,”波士顿滑冰俱乐部教练、家族密友苏珊·哈梅尔-博塔里(Susan Hamel-Bottari)在瑙莫夫完成比赛后告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻。“他总说,这不是一个人的梦想,而是三个人的。”
周二男子短节目比赛期间,这一梦想在米兰冰场溜冰场得以实现。
就在他踏上冰面之前,头顶的大屏幕上出现了一行字:“爸爸妈妈,这是为你们而战。”
(图:美国花样滑冰选手马克西姆·瑙莫夫在2026年2月10日意大利米兰举行的米兰-科尔蒂纳冬奥会花样滑冰男子单人滑短节目比赛中。Joris Verwijst/BSR Agency/Getty)
瑙莫夫随后呈现了职业生涯中最出色的一次滑行,获得85.65分,足以晋级本周晚些时候的自由滑比赛。
但数字仅讲述了故事的一部分。
完成比赛后,他跪倒在地,仰望天空。体育场内的观众也将情感倾注而出,给予他热烈的起立鼓掌。
之后,他拿出一张照片——照片中是年幼的他和未来的奥运选手,站在冰面上,父母分别站在他两侧。
(图:2026年2月10日,美国队选手马克西姆·瑙莫夫在米兰-科尔蒂纳2026年冬奥会花样滑冰男子单人滑短节目比赛后,手持一张自己与父母的合影。WANG Zhao/AFP)
“我不知道自己是该哭、该笑还是该笑中带泪,”瑙莫夫赛后表示,“我只能抬头仰望他们。我仍然不敢相信刚才发生的一切。”
他的美国队夹克内袋里,装着一句简短的留言——他父亲最喜欢的提醒之一:“意料之外,便是常态。”
过去一年,这句建议以难以想象的方式受到了考验。
希什科娃和瑙莫夫是去年一架客机与军用直升机在华盛顿特区附近相撞事故中的67名遇难者之一。当时他们正结束一次滑冰发展训练营,返回途中遭遇不幸。
(图:1994年2月15日,挪威利勒哈默尔冬奥会,瓦季姆·瑙莫夫和叶夫根尼娅·希什科娃参赛。Chris Cole/Allsport/Getty)
这场悲剧令他们紧密相连的滑冰社区——包括波士顿滑冰俱乐部——陷入巨大悲痛,俱乐部失去了数名成员。
哈梅尔-博塔里回忆起那天的震惊以及之后的感受。
“我不知道该如何回应他,”她说,“我只是告诉他,我会永远在他身边。”
哈梅尔-博塔里告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,他在过去几个月中的韧性令人鼓舞。
“无论发生什么,他每天都会来溜冰场,”她说,“无论内心感受如何,他都坚持出席。他意志坚强,是个斗士。”
瑙莫夫全身心投入训练,在冰面上寻找慰藉与释放。
“每一次滑行和脚步移动,我都忍不住感觉到他们的存在,”他说,“几乎就像棋盘上的棋子。”
除了个人竞技目标,瑙莫夫还延续了父母的事业。他们创立了“明日冠军”项目,这是波士顿滑冰俱乐部的一个发展计划,通过严格的冰上训练、体能训练、体操和芭蕾结合的方式培养年轻滑冰选手。
即便在备战奥运会期间,瑙莫夫仍继续教授该项目课程。
“孩子们都很喜欢他,”哈梅尔-博塔里说,“他非常积极乐观。他从最好的老师那里学习——也就是他的父母。”
许多年轻选手在米兰观看了瑙莫夫的比赛。一些人专程前往意大利,举着印有自己手印和名字的自制标语牌;另一些人则在家中为他欢呼。
“作为波士顿滑冰俱乐部的大家庭,看到他以及我们共同经历的一切,真的会让人热泪盈眶,”哈梅尔-博塔里说,“今晚,他做到了。”
瑙莫夫曾表示,他并不专注于奥运首秀的完美表现。
“我只想全力以赴,”他说,“把一切都留在冰场上,不留遗憾。”
在所有鼓舞人心的奥运故事中,瑙莫夫的表现因其超越分数和排名的深层意义而格外突出。
Friend says Maxim Naumov’s Olympic debut was a dream he shared with his parents, as he carries on their legacy
February 11, 2026 / 11:44 AM EST / CBS News
Milan— When Maxim Naumov stepped onto Olympic ice at the 2026 Winter Games in Milan on Tuesday, he wasn’t alone.
As the music began and the lights reflected off the rink, the 24-year-old American skater was fulfilling a dream he shared with his parents, former Olympic pairs skaters Evgenia Shishkova and Vadim Naumov. They were both killed last year in the midair collision over the Potomac River.
“It was a dream that all of them had,” Susan Hamel-Bottari, a coach at the Skating Club of Boston and a close friend of the family, told CBS News after Naumov skated. “He always says it’s not one, it’s three.”
That dream played out at the Milano Ice Skating Arena during the men’s short program competition on Tuesday.
Right before he took the ice, on the jumbotron over his head, a message appeared: “Mom and Dad, this is for you.”
Figure skater Maxim Naumov of the U.S. during his short program routine at the Milano Ice Skating Arena in the Winter Olympics on Feb. 10, 2026, in Milan, Italy. Joris Verwijst/BSR Agency/Getty
Naumov then delivered one of the strongest skates of his career, earning a score of 85.65, enough to advance to the free skate round later this week.
But the numbers told only part of his story.
After finishing his program, he dropped to his knees and looked up. The crowd in the stadium let their emotions pour out as well, giving him a standing ovation.
He later pulled out a photo of himself as a small boy and future Olympian, standing on the ice for the first time between his parents.
Team USA’s Maxim Naumov holds a picture of himself with his parents, after competing in the figure skating men’s singles short program during the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Olympic Games, Feb. 10, 2026. WANG Zhao/AFP
“I didn’t know if I was going to cry, smile or laugh,” Naumov said afterward. “All I could do was look up at them. I still can’t believe what just happened.”
Inside his Team USA jacket, he carried a short message — one of his father’s favorite reminders: “Expect the unexpected.”
The past year has tested that advice in unimaginable ways.
Shishkova and Naumov were among 67 people killed last year when the passenger aircraft they were on collided with a military helicopter near Washington, D.C. They were on their way home from a skating development camp.
Vadim Naumov and Evgenia Shishkova are seen competing at the Winter Olympics in Lillehammer, Norway, Feb. 15, 1994. Chris Cole/Allsport/Getty
The tragedy devastated their tight-knit skating community, including the Skating Club of Boston, which lost several members.
Hamel-Bottari remembers the shock of that day, and what came after.
“I didn’t know how to respond to him,” she said. “I just told him I would always be there for him.”
His resilience in the months since has been inspiring, Hamel-Bottari told CBS News.
“Every day he would come to the rink, no matter what,” she said. “No matter what he was feeling inside, he showed up. He’s mentally tough. He’s a fighter.”
Naumov leaned into his training, finding both refuge and release.
“With every glide and step that I made on the ice, I couldn’t help but feel their presence,” he said. “Almost like a chess piece on a chessboard.”
Beyond his own competitive goals, Naumov has also carried on with his parents’ work. They founded Tomorrow’s Champions, a development program at the Skating Club of Boston designed to train young skaters through a rigorous mix of on-ice sessions, off-ice conditioning, gymnastics and ballet.
Even while training for the Olympics, Naumov continued teaching in the program.
“The kids love him,” Hamel-Bottari said. “He’s very positive. He learned from the best — from both of them.”
Many of those young skaters were watching as Naumov took to the ice in Milan. Some traveled to Italy and held up handmade signs with their handprints and names. Others cheered from home.
“For us, as the Skating Club of Boston family, to see him and know what we went through, it just brings tears to your eyes,” Hamel-Bottari said. “Tonight, he did it.”
Naumov has said that he wasn’t focused on perfection in his Olympic debut.
“I wanted to go out there and just give my heart out,” he said. “Leave everything out there. Have no regrets.”
Amid all the inspirational Olympic storylines, Naumov’s performance stood apart for reasons far beyond scores and standings.