博客

  • 杰夫·贝佐斯称美国底层工薪阶层不应缴纳联邦所得税


    2026年5月20日 美国东部时间下午1:23 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    记者:梅根·塞鲁洛,MoneyWatch栏目
    梅根·塞鲁洛是哥伦比亚广播公司MoneyWatch驻纽约记者,报道小企业、职场、医疗保健、消费者支出和个人理财话题。她经常做客哥伦比亚广播公司新闻24小时频道解读相关报道。

    查看完整简历

    亚马逊创始人杰夫·贝佐斯周三接受CNBC采访时表示,美国底层一半的工薪阶层不应缴纳联邦所得税,他认为取消这些税收可以缓解经济压力并激励创业。

    目前美国半数纳税人缴纳的联邦所得税约占总税额的3%,贝佐斯称这一比例应降至“零”。据彭博亿万富翁指数显示,2021年卸任亚马逊首席执行官的贝佐斯是全球第四大富豪,身家估值达2790亿美元。

    无党派税收政策机构税收基金会的数据显示,美国最富有的1%家庭缴纳了约40%的联邦所得税。

    贝佐斯此番言论正值美国部分民主党州议员和国会议员再次推动针对百万富翁和亿万富翁的新财富税之际。与此同时,共和党所谓的“宏伟且完善”的税收与支出法案包含了减税条款,批评人士称这些减税政策主要惠及最富裕家庭。

    贝佐斯表示,政府可以通过“取消困难人群的纳税义务”,为他们“提供更好的创业成功机会”。
    “他们或许会成为下一个史蒂夫·乔布斯,”贝佐斯在谈及已故苹果联合创始人时说道。

    零税负,而非减税

    贝佐斯明确表示,他并非呼吁降低低收入家庭的所得税。
    “我不是要减税,而是要彻底免税,”他在接受CNBC采访人安德鲁·罗斯·索尔金采访时表示,“我认为零税率意义非凡,零比1美元这个数字要好得多。”

    贝佐斯发表此番观点之际,部分民主党州正在提议对超级富豪居民征税。上个月,加州一项针对亿万富翁征税的提案支持者征集到了足够签名,该提案将出现在11月的投票清单中。该提案将对净资产超过10亿美元的加州居民征收一次性5%的税。

    今年3月,马萨诸塞州联邦参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦提出了《2026年超级百万富翁税法》。该法案呼吁对资产超过5000万美元的家庭和信托基金征收每年2%的税,并对亿万富翁的财富额外征收1%的税。该法案还提议对放弃美国公民身份、资产超过5000万美元的个人征收40%的“出境税”。

    此外,新泽西州参议员科里·布克提出了《保留薪酬法案》,该法案将取消联合报税家庭首7.5万美元收入的所得税。

    税收基金会的数据显示,根据联邦所得税体系,2023年年收入低于53801美元的半数纳税人平均所得税税率为3.7%。而最富有的1%纳税人平均税率为26.3%。

    艾米·皮奇 编辑

    Jeff Bezos says bottom half of U.S. earners should pay no federal income tax

    May 20, 2026 1:23 PM EDT / CBS News

    By Megan Cerullo Reporter, MoneyWatch
    Megan Cerullo is a New York-based reporter for CBS MoneyWatch covering small business, workplace, health care, consumer spending and personal finance topics. She regularly appears on CBS News 24/7 to discuss her reporting.

    Read Full Bio

    Amazon founder Jeff Bezos told CNBC on Wednesday that the bottom half of U.S. earners should pay no federal income tax, arguing that eliminating those taxes could ease financial strain and encourage entrepreneurship.

    The bottom half of U.S. taxpayers currently pays about 3% of federal income taxes, a share Bezos said should fall to “zero.” Bezos, who stepped back as Amazon’s CEO in 2021, is the world’s fourth-richest person, with a fortune valued at $279 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

    The top 1% of households pay about 40% of federal income taxes, according to the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan tax policy institute.

    Bezos’ comments come amid renewed pushes from some Democratic state and federal lawmakers to institute new wealth taxes aimed at millionaires and billionaires. At the same time, the Republicans’ “big, beautiful” tax and spending bill included tax breaks that critics say predominantly help the wealthiest households.

    The government can give “people who are struggling today” a better chance at entrepreneurial success “by eliminating their tax bill,” Bezos said.

    “Maybe they’re going to be the next Steve Jobs,” Bezos said, referring to the late co-founder of Apple.

    Zero taxes, not lower taxes

    Bezos made it clear that he’s not calling for a reduction in income tax for lower-income families.

    “I don’t want to reduce it, I want to eliminate it,” he told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin. “I think there’s something very powerful about zero. Zero is a better number than $1.”

    Bezos stated his views as some Democratic states are proposing taxes on ultra-wealthy residents. Last month, proponents of a proposal to tax California billionaires obtained enough signatures for the measure to appear on the November ballot. The measure would impose a one-time 5% tax on Californians with net worths of $1 billion or more.

    In March, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, introduced the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act of 2026. The bill calls for an annual 2% tax on households and trusts worth more than $50 million, plus an extra 1% tax on billionaires’ wealth. It also proposes a 40% “exit tax” on individuals worth more than $50 million who renounce their American citizenship.

    Additionally, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey has proposed the Keep Your Pay Act, which would eliminate taxes on the first $75,000 for households filing joint tax returns.

    Under the federal income-tax system, the bottom half of taxpayers — those making less than $53,801 annually — faced an average income-tax rate of 3.7% in 2023, Tax Foundation data shows. The top 1% paid an average rate of 26.3%.

    Edited by Aimee Picchi

  • 参议院两党推动立法永久终结政府停摆


    2026年5月20日 美国东部时间下午1:00 / 福克斯新闻

    兰克福德与哈桑计划在肯尼迪修改薪酬规则后加快推进《防止政府停摆法案》

    作者:亚历克斯·米勒,福克斯新闻

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6383758955112

    参议员兰克福德提出法案以避免政府停摆

    福克斯新闻资深国会记者查德·珀格拉姆与俄克拉荷马州共和党参议员詹姆斯·兰克福德做客《福克纳焦点》,就政府停摆进入首个无薪周时联邦雇员薪酬支付投票失败一事展开讨论。

    新增功能: 你现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    【福克斯新闻独家首发】 参议院正采取另一项举措防止政府停摆,这一次是要彻底杜绝停摆发生。

    此次行动此前,路易斯安那州共和党参议员约翰·肯尼迪成功修改了参议院规则,禁止议员在停摆期间领取薪酬——此举旨在确保参议员在未来政府停摆期间,能和联邦雇员一样切身感受到痛苦。

    但俄克拉荷马州共和党参议员詹姆斯·兰克福德与新罕布什尔州民主党参议员玛吉·哈桑正进一步采取行动,彻底防止政府停摆再次发生。

    参议院通过问责法案,迈出防止未来停摆的重要第一步

    2026年3月23日,参议员詹姆斯·兰克福德在华盛顿特区国会大厦内行走。(希瑟·迪尔/盖蒂图片社)

    兰克福德长期以来一直在推动《防止政府停摆法案》,数年前就差一点成功通过该法案。如今借着肯尼迪修改规则的余热,他计划重新提交这项立法,并加快推进至全院投票。

    兰克福德在给福克斯新闻数字频道的一份声明中表示,美国民众已经对“毫无意义的政府停摆闹剧以及国会将联邦雇员和政府服务作为政治对峙筹码的行为”感到厌倦。

    他说:“《防止政府停摆法案》用一个简单的理念永久终结政府停摆:如果国会未能履职,国会就不能放假回家。我们将压力从美国民众身上转移到他们选举出的议员身上。此前这项法案只差三票就能通过,现在是时候完成这项工作了。”

    历史性停摆导致员工无薪后,参议员同意停摆期间放弃薪酬

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6391469122112

    肯尼迪参议员的提案遭民主党人阻挠,国土安全部停摆期间议员薪酬被扣法案落空

    一旦再次发生政府停摆,该法案将自动触发短期融资延期,每次维持政府运作14天。该法案还将对议员及其幕僚施加严格限制,禁止他们使用纳税人资金前往华盛顿特区以外的地方出差。

    法案还将取消国会代表团海外出行计划,并阻止议员休会——这是本届国会期间43天和76天政府停摆期间,参众两院遭到的主要批评点之一。

    鉴于肯尼迪的规则修改获得了全票支持,人们乐观地认为兰克福德和哈桑的法案也将获得同样结果。

    共和党人希望永久终结政府停摆,担忧民主党会再次引发停摆

    2025年11月10日,新罕布什尔州民主党参议员玛吉·哈桑在华盛顿特区美国国会大厦内。(亚伦·施瓦茨/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    哈桑在给福克斯新闻数字频道的一份声明中表示,该法案“激励国会按时为政府提供资金,并确保在国会无法达成协议时,有预案保护民众家庭和我们的经济”。

    她说:“政府停摆代价高昂、本可避免,却让新罕布什尔州乃至全美民众为国会的失职买单。”

    兰克福德上次在2023年推进该法案时以微弱差距失败,当时几乎所有参议院民主党人都投了反对票,而几乎所有参议院共和党人——除了肯塔基州参议员兰德·保罗——都投了支持票。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    议员们仍在应对最近一次停摆的连锁反应,此次停摆导致国土安全部及其数万名联邦员工数月未领到薪酬。

    共和党人正深入推进预算和解程序,以完成该机构移民业务的资金拨付,预计将于本周末在参议院推进相关法案。

    亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道记者,负责报道美国参议院事务。

    Senate plots permanent end to government shutdowns with bipartisan push

    May 20, 2026 1:00pm EDT / Fox News

    Sens. Lankford and Hassan plan to fast-track the Prevent Government Shutdowns Act after Kennedy’s pay rule change

    By Alex Miller, Fox News

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6383758955112

    Sen. Lankford proposes bill to avoid government shutdowns

    Fox News senior congressional correspondent Chad Pergram and Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., join ‘The Faulkner Focus’ to discuss the failed vote to pay federal workers amid the government shutdown as they enter their first week without pay.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    FIRST ON FOX:The Senate is taking another step to prevent government shutdowns, this time to stop them from happening altogether.

    It’s a move that comes after Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., successfully changed the Senate rules to prevent lawmakers in the upper chamber from being paid during shutdowns — a play designed to ensure that senators feel the same pain as federal workers during future closures.

    But Sens. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., are taking things a step further to outright prevent government shutdowns from ever happening again.

    SENATE TAKES MAJOR FIRST STEP TO PREVENT FUTURE SHUTDOWNS WITH PAINFUL ACCOUNTABILITY PLAY

    Sen. James Lankford walks through the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on March 23, 2026.(Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

    Lankford has long been pushing his Prevent Government Shutdowns Act, and was nearly successful in passing it years ago. Now, with momentum still fresh from Kennedy’s rule change, he plans to reintroduce the legislation and fast-track it to a floor vote.

    Lankford contended in a statement to Fox News Digital that Americans had grown wary of “worthless government shutdown drama and Congress using federal workers and government services as pawns in political standoffs.”

    “The Prevent Government Shutdowns Act ends government shutdowns forever with a simple idea: if Congress doesn’t do its job, Congress doesn’t get to go home,” he said. “We shift the pressure off the American people and onto the people they elected. We came within three votes of passing this before, and it is time to finish the job.”

    SENATORS AGREE TO GO WITHOUT PAY DURING SHUTDOWNS AFTER HISTORIC CLOSURES LEFT WORKERS UNPAID

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6391469122112

    Sen. Kennedy stunned as Democrat blocks bill to withhold congressional pay during DHS shutdown

    In the event of another shutdown, the legislation would automatically trigger a short-term funding extension to keep the government open for 14 days at a time. It would also install strict limits on lawmakers and their staff by preventing them from embarking on taxpayer-funded travel outside of Washington, D.C.

    It would also nix congressional delegations overseas and prevent lawmakers from taking a recess, a key point of criticism against both chambers during the 43-day and 76-day government shutdowns that happened during this Congress.

    Given the unanimous support for Kennedy’s rule change, there’s optimism that Lankford and Hassan’s bill will have the same result.

    REPUBLICANS EYE ENDING GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWNS FOREVER OVER FEARS DEMS WILL DO IT AGAIN

    Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 10, 2025.(Aaron Schwartz/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    Hassan said in a statement to Fox News Digital that the bill “incentivizes Congress to fund the government on time and ensures that there is a plan in place to protect families and our economy if Congress cannot come to an agreement.”

    “Government shutdowns are costly, avoidable, and make people in New Hampshire and across the country pay the price for the failures of Congress,” Hassan said.

    Lankford’s last attempt to advance the legislation in 2023 narrowly failed, with nearly every Senate Democrat voting against it while nearly every Senate Republican — save for Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. — supported it.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Lawmakers are still dealing with the ripple effects of the latest shutdown, which saw the Department of Homeland Security and its tens of thousands of federal workers go without pay for months.

    Republicans are deep into the budget reconciliation process to finish funding immigration operations at the agency and are expected to advance the package from the Senate by week’s end.

    Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.

  • 英国国防部称俄军战机在黑海上空“危险拦截”英国侦察机


    2026-05-20T13:19:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    英国国防部周三在一份声明中表示,上月有两架俄罗斯战机在黑海上空“反复且危险地”拦截了一架英国侦察机。

    英国国防大臣约翰·希利在声明中表示:“这一事件再次体现了俄罗斯飞行员的危险且不可接受的行为,他们针对的是在国际空域执行任务的 unarmed ( unarmed 保留,应为 unarmed,无武装)飞机。这些行为严重增加了事故风险,可能导致局势升级。”

    此次事件发生之际,两国关系因乌克兰战争以及长期以来的间谍指控而处于历史低点。

    声明补充称,俄军苏-35和苏-27战机上月拦截了英国皇家空军的“铆钉接头”侦察机,其中一架苏-27战机一度距离英国飞机机头仅6米(19英尺),同时还附带了一段时长12秒的事件相关视频。

    这架侦察机当时正在国际空域执行例行飞行任务,作为英国与盟友协同保障北约东部侧翼安全行动的一部分。


    英国国防部2026年5月20日发表声明称,上月有两架俄罗斯战机在黑海上空“反复且危险地”拦截了一架英国侦察机。英国国防部

    官员们表示,此次对峙是自2022年以来涉及英国“铆钉接头”侦察机最严重的一次事件。2022年,一架俄罗斯战机在同一区域上空向一架英国飞机附近发射了一枚导弹。

    在此次新事件中,“一架俄罗斯苏-35战机飞得过近,触发了‘铆钉接头’侦察机的应急系统,包括自动驾驶系统失灵”,国防部表示。

    “在另一次危险拦截中,一架俄罗斯苏-27战机在英国飞机前方进行了6次通场飞行”,声明补充道。

    “严重后果”

    希利表示,这起事件不会“削弱英国捍卫北约、盟友以及自身利益免受俄罗斯侵略的承诺”。

    此次拦截事件发生在希利宣布英国皇家海军追踪并“驱离”三艘俄罗斯潜艇数天之后。这些潜艇据称在英国北部大西洋海域进行了为期一个月的“秘密行动”,活动区域靠近重要的海底光缆和输油管道。

    希利在4月9日公开了此次监视行动的细节。

    他警告俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京,任何破坏英国海底光缆和输油管道的企图都将“带来严重后果”。

    英国的监视任务涉及约500名人员,英国军机飞行时长超过450小时,一艘海军护卫舰航行数千海里。

    去年的一项国防评估得出结论,俄罗斯对英国构成“直接且紧迫”的威胁。

    自2022年2月莫斯科入侵乌克兰以来,英国历届政府一直是乌克兰的坚定支持者。

    声明补充称,英国国防和外交大臣官员本周已就此次空中事件正式向俄罗斯大使馆提出抗议。

    此次拦截事件是两国之间最新的军事对峙事件。

    2025年12月,英国海军称其追踪到一艘俄罗斯潜艇在英吉利海峡航行三天。同月,英国与挪威签署合作协议,将共同运作一支护卫舰舰队,在北大西洋“猎杀”潜艇。


    英国海军称其追踪到一艘俄罗斯潜艇在英吉利海峡航行三天。英国皇家海军

    2025年11月,希利表示,一艘俄罗斯间谍船在英国水域附近追踪其活动时,用激光照射英国皇家空军飞行员。英国方面称,该船只被用于收集情报和绘制海底光缆地图。

    2024年11月,英国战机紧急起飞监视一架靠近英国空域的俄罗斯侦察机。就在几天前,俄罗斯战机在波罗的海上空和挪威海岸附近被发现,北约战机随即紧急出动。

    U.K. spy plane “dangerously intercepted” by Russian military jets over Black Sea, defense ministry says

    2026-05-20T13:19:00-0400 / CBS News

    Two Russian jets “repeatedly and dangerously” intercepted a British surveillance aircraft over the Black Sea last month, the defense ministry said in a statement on Wednesday.

    “This incident is another example of dangerous and unacceptable behaviour by Russian pilots, towards an unarmed aircraft operating in international airspace. These actions create a serious risk of accidents and potential escalation,” Defense Minister John Healey said in the communique.

    The incident comes as relations between the two countries remain at a historic low over the Ukraine war and longstanding spying allegations.

    The Russian Su-35 and Su-27 jets intercepted the Royal Air Force (RAF) Rivet Joint aircraft last month with the Su-27 at one point flying as close as six meters (19 feet) to the British plane’s nose, the statement added, along with a 12-second video of the alleged incident.

    The surveillance aircraft was taking part in a routine flight in international airspace as part of the U.K.’s work alongside allies to secure NATO’s Eastern Flank.

    Two Russian jets “repeatedly and dangerously” intercepted a British surveillance aircraft over the Black Sea last month, the defense ministry said in a statement on May 20, 2026. U.K. Defense Ministry

    Officials said the encounter was the most serious involving a U.K. Rivet Joint since 2022. In that case, a Russian aircraft fired a missile near a British plane over the same region.

    In the new incident, “one Russian Su-35 aircraft flew close enough to trigger emergency systems on the Rivet Joint, including disabling the autopilot system,” the ministry said.

    “In another dangerous intercept, a Russian Su-27 aircraft conducted six passes in front of the British aircraft,” it added.

    “Serious consequences”

    Healey said the incident would not “deter the UK’s commitment to defend NATO, our allies and our interests from Russian aggression.”

    The intercepts came days after Healey announced that the Royal Navy had tracked and “seen off” three Russian submarines on an alleged month-long “covert operation” in Atlantic waters “north of the U.K.” near vital undersea cables and pipelines.

    Healey made details of the monitoring operation public on April 9.

    He warned Russian President Vladimir Putin that any attempt to damage U.K. cables and pipelines would have “serious consequences.”

    The U.K. monitoring mission involved around 500 personnel and saw U.K. aircraft fly more than 450 hours while a navy frigate covered several thousand nautical miles.

    A defense review last year concluded that Russia poses an “immediate and pressing” threat to the nation.

    The British government under successive prime ministers has been a staunch supporter of Ukraine following Moscow’s February 2022 invasion.

    Defense and foreign ministry officials this week formally complained to the Russian embassy about the air incident, the statement added.

    The interception marks the latest military incident between the two countries.

    In December 2025, the British navy said it tracked a Russian submarine navigating through the English Channel for three days. That same month, the U.K. and Norway signed a cooperation agreement to jointly operate a fleet of frigates to”hunt down” submarinesin the North Atlantic.

    The British navy said it tracked a Russian submarine navigating through the English Channel for three days. Royal Navy

    In November 2025, Healey said aRussian spy ship pointed lasers at Royal Air Force pilotstracking its activity near U.K. waters. Britain said the ship was being used for gathering intelligence and mapping undersea cables.

    In November 2024, British jets were scrambled to monitor a Russian reconnaissance aircraft flying close to U.K. airspace, just days afterNATO jets were mobilizedwhen Russian aircraft were spotted over the Baltic Sea and off the coast of Norway.

  • “一记耳光”:前国会警察起诉阻止特朗普的“反武器化”资金


    2026年5月20日 下午2:54 美国东部时间 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)
    作者:玛格丽特·吉文,CNN
    发布于2026年5月20日 周三 下午2:54 美国东部时间
    https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/20/politics/video/cncpm-harry-dunn-suing-anti-weaponization-fund

    “一记耳光”:前国会警察起诉阻止特朗普的“反武器化”资金

    美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)的布丽安娜·凯勒采访了哈里·邓恩——这位曾在2021年1月6日保卫国会大厦的前美国国会警察。他正参与一起诉讼,起诉特朗普政府,要求阻止一项新设立的18亿美元资金的实施,该资金将拨付给声称自己遭到前一届政府不公平调查的总统唐纳德·特朗普的盟友。

    5:44 • 来源:CNN

    ‘A slap in the face:’ Fmr Capitol Police officer suing to stop Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

    2026-05-20 2:54 PM EDT / CNN

    By Margaret Given, CNN

    Published 2:54 PM EDT, Wed May 20, 2026

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/20/politics/video/cncpm-harry-dunn-suing-anti-weaponization-fund

    ‘A slap in the face:’ Fmr Capitol Police officer suing to stop Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

    CNN’s Brianna Keilar speaks with Harry Dunn, a former member of the US Capitol Police who protected the Capitol on January 6, 2021. He is part of a lawsuit suing the Trump administration to block the implementation of a newly created $1.8 billion fund for allies of President Donald Trump who say they were unfairly investigated by previous administration.

    5:44 • Source: CNN

  • 奥马尔就所谓欺诈关联打破沉默,声明直指特朗普政府:“彻头彻尾的谎言”


    2026-05-20 13:04:55-04:00 / 福克斯新闻频道

    明尼苏达州女议员在新声明中表示:“任何声称我知晓这一阴谋的说法都是彻头彻尾的谎言”

    作者:安德鲁·马克·米勒、基拉·麦克唐纳 福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年5月20日美国东部时间下午1:04 | 更新时间:2026年5月20日美国东部时间下午1:12

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6396054512112

    伊尔汉·奥马尔因财务问题面临新调查

    明尼苏达州民主党众议员伊尔汉·奥马尔因修改财务披露文件引发争议,正面临众议院道德委员会对其财务状况的新调查。此次修改将其家庭 reported 财富从最高3000万美元大幅下调至不足10万美元。明尼苏达州州众议员克里斯汀·罗宾斯要求奥马尔给出解释,奥马尔牵头推动的《膳食法案》也牵涉一起2.5亿美元的欺诈案。

    【福克斯新闻独家首发】

    明尼苏达州民主党众议员伊尔汉·奥马尔就批评人士对其可能与明尼苏达州“喂养我们的未来”重大欺诈丑闻有关联的质疑发声,并暗示特朗普政府应承担责任。

    “任何声称我知晓这一阴谋的说法都是彻头彻尾的谎言,”这位明尼苏达州联邦众议员周三在给福克斯新闻数字频道的书面声明中说道。

    “《膳食法案》由特朗普总统签署成为法律,在两党支持下作为一项更广泛的立法包的一部分获得通过。特朗普政府的农业部部长在该项目推出期间制定了监管框架。我一直致力于保障儿童供餐,并且将继续确保我们的孩子不会挨饿。”

    奥马尔随后表示,在“这一欺诈行为曝光的那一刻”,她“立即致信农业部部长,要求给出解释并追究责任”。


    伊尔汉·奥马尔被要求解释明尼苏达州欺诈案为何“彻底失控”

    明尼苏达州民主党众议员伊尔汉·奥马尔周三就与“喂养我们的未来”丑闻相关的指控作出回应,称这些说法“彻头彻尾的谎言”,并指责唐纳德·特朗普总统签署了《膳食法案》成为法律。(汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. 盖蒂图片社;温·麦克纳梅/盖蒂图片社)

    “正如我从一开始就指出的那样,打着喂养饥饿儿童的幌子窃取数百万美元来资助奢华生活和高额开支的行为令人发指,”奥马尔说道。“我很高兴艾米·博克和所有参与这一可恶阴谋的人都因欺骗纳税人、背叛弱势儿童而被追究责任。”

    奥马尔发表此番言论之前,越来越多的压力要求她解释自己对这起让纳税人损失数亿美元的丑闻的了解程度以及关联情况。

    明尼苏达州众议院预防欺诈和州机构监督委员会邀请奥马尔就她所知的情况作证,但奥马尔始终未予回应,这促使该委员会发起传唤获取她相关信息的行动。该行动遭到委员会民主党议员的阻挠。


    JD·万斯表示,司法部正在调查伊尔汉·奥马尔是否存在移民欺诈,相关指控涉及与兄弟假结婚

    明尼苏达州民主党众议员伊尔汉·奥马尔2026年1月28日在明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯的卡梅尔商场发表讲话。(埃里克·塞耶/洛杉矶时报 盖蒂图片社)

    就在上周,该委员会发布了最终报告,指责蒂姆·瓦尔兹州长的政府助长了一种“容忍文化”,使得欺诈者总共窃取了数十亿美元的纳税人资金。

    该报告对奥马尔提出了强烈批评,称她推动并纳入《家庭-first冠状病毒应对法案》的《膳食法案》“拆除了联邦营养项目的防护栏”,允许营利性餐厅参与,并允许“取餐即走”的灵活政策,这使得几乎无法核实“喂养我们的未来”项目是否真正为儿童提供了餐食。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6396070529112

    该委员会共和党主席、州众议员克里斯汀·罗宾斯建议国会应采取行动强制执行传唤令,以获取更多有关奥马尔所谓与定罪欺诈犯关联、公开宣传一家后来与该项目有关联的明尼阿波利斯餐厅,以及与明尼苏达州教育部和选民的沟通与会议记录等问题的答案。

    “她是在欺诈行为曝光后才发了一封信,”罗宾斯在回应奥马尔的声明时告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。

    “在此之前,她曾致信敦促政府保留豁免政策——这使得欺诈行为得以继续。这听起来像是在修正历史。我根本不相信。”

    本月早些时候,福克斯新闻数字频道报道称,奥马尔的一名前幕僚向委员会发送邮件,同样将矛头指向特朗普第一任期内的农业部,并淡化了奥马尔的《膳食法案》立法可能带来的负面影响。

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系白宫和农业部置评。

    安德鲁·马克·米勒是福克斯新闻记者。可在推特@andymarkmiller 找到他,或发送爆料邮件至AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com。

    Omar breaks silence on alleged fraud connections in statement pointing to Trump admin: ‘Flat-out false’

    2026-05-20 13:04:55-04:00 / Fox News

    Minnesota congresswoman says ‘any claim that I had knowledge of this scheme is flat-out false,’ in new statement

    By Andrew Mark Miller , Kiera McDonald Fox News

    Published May 20, 2026 1:04pm EDT | Updated May 20, 2026 1:12pm EDT

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6396054512112

    Ilhan Omar under new investigation over finances

    Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., faces a new investigation by the House Ethics Committee into her finances, stemming from a controversial change in her financial disclosures. The revision drastically cut her family’s reported wealth from up to $30 million to less than $100,000. Minnesota State Representative Kristin Robbins demands answers from Omar, whose sponsored MEALS Act was also implicated in a $250 million fraud.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    FIRST ON FOX:Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., is speaking out over mounting questions from critics about her possible connection to the massive Feeding Our Future fraud scandal in Minnesota and suggested the Trump administration bears responsibility.

    “Any claim that I had knowledge of this scheme is flat-out false,” the Minnesota congresswoman said in a written statement to Fox News Digital on Wednesday.

    “The MEALS Act was signed into law by President Trump and passed with bipartisan support as part of a broader legislative package. Trump’s USDA Secretary set the regulatory framework during the rollout of the program. I have always championed feeding kids and will continue to ensure our children do not go hungry.”

    Omar went on to say that the “moment this fraud came to light” she “immediately sent a letter to the USDA Secretary demanding answers and accountability.”

    ILHAN OMAR PRESSED TO EXPLAIN HOW FRAUD IN MINNESOTA GOT ‘SO OUT OF CONTROL’

    Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., responded Wednesday to allegations tied to the Feeding Our Future scandal, calling the claims “flat-out false” and blaming President Donald Trump for signing the MEALS Act into law.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Win McNamee/Getty Images)

    “As I stated from the beginning, stealing millions of dollars under the guise of feeding hungry children to bankroll lavish lifestyles and extravagant expenses is reprehensible,” Omar said. “I’m grateful that Aimee Bock and every individual involved in this abhorrent scheme are being held accountable for defrauding taxpayers and betraying vulnerable children.”

    Omar’s comment comes after she faced mounting pressure to explain her knowledge of and connections to the scandal that cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

    The Minnesota House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee invited Omar to testify about what she knew but says she never responded, which prompted an effort to subpoena information from her. That effort was blocked by Democrats on the committee.

    JD VANCE SAYS DOJ LOOKING INTO IF ILHAN OMAR COMMITTED IMMIGRATION FRAUD AMID BROTHER-MARRIAGE ALLEGATIONS

    Rep. Ilhan Omar speaks at Karmel Mall in Minneapolis, Minn., on Jan. 28, 2026.(Eric Thayer / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

    Just last week, the committee released its final report that accused Gov. Tim Walz’s administration of fostering a “culture of tolerance” that allowed fraudsters to steal billions in taxpayer dollars overall.

    The report offered a strong critique of Omar, asserting that her MEALS Act, implemented into the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, “took the guardrails off” federal nutrition programs by allowing for-profit restaurants to participate and permitting “grab-and-go” flexibilities that made it nearly impossible to verify if children were actually being fed by the Feeding Our Future program.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6396070529112

    The committee’s Republican chair, state Rep. Kristin Robbins, has suggested that Congress should take action to enforce the subpoena and get more answers about questions related to Omar’s alleged association with convicted fraudsters, her public promotion of a Minneapolis restaurant that later became linked to the program, along with communication and meeting records with the Minnesota Department of Education and constituents.

    “She only sent a letter once the fraud was exposed,” Robbins told Fox News Digital in response to Omar’s statement.

    “Prior to that, she sent letters urging the administration to keep the waivers in place — allowing the fraud to continue. Sounds like revisionist history. I don’t buy it at all.”

    Earlier this month, Fox News Digital reported that a former Omar staffer sent an email to the committee also pointing to Trump’s USDA during his first term and downplaying the potential negative impact of Omar’s MEALS Act legislation.

    Fox News Digital reached out to the White House and USDA for comment.

    Andrew Mark Miller is a reporter at Fox News. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email tips to AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com.

  • 美国民主党议员试图约束特朗普对古巴的行动,白宫加大对古施压


    2026-05-20T17:35:12.711Z / 路透社

    U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) speaks during a U.S. Senate Democratic leaders' press conference following their weekly policy lunch, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon/File Photo

    提要

    支持者援引特朗普的威胁及美军备战相关报道

    • 参议员们辩称古巴并未对美国构成重大威胁
    • 越来越多共和党人担忧特朗普发动多场军事行动

    华盛顿,5月20日(路透社)——一群美国民主党参议员周三提出一项决议,旨在阻止唐纳德·特朗普总统动用军事力量打击古巴,与此同时特朗普政府通过起诉前总统劳尔·卡斯特罗,加大了对这个岛国政府的施压力度。

    来自弗吉尼亚州的民主党议员蒂姆·凯恩、加利福尼亚州的亚当·希夫以及亚利桑那州的鲁本·加列戈提出了一项《战争权力决议》,禁止美国武装力量对这个由共产党执政的岛国动用武力。

    即刻开启您的晨间法律资讯订阅

    由《每日案卷》新闻简报直接发送至您的收件箱,获取最新法律新闻。点击此处注册

    他们援引了这位共和党籍总统多次威胁派遣军队推翻哈瓦那政府的言论,以及美国南方司令部已受命制定作战计划的报道,尽管古巴并未对美国构成重大国家安全威胁。

    “美国军方是世界上最优秀的,但在对美国没有明确益处的情况下,我们的军人不应该被派往险境,”凯恩说道。他一直致力于推动国会落实宪法条款,即只有国会而非总统拥有宣战权。

    在罕见的对特朗普的批评声中,由共和党掌控的参议院周二投票推进一项决议,要求除非政府获得国会授权,否则结束针对伊朗的战争。这是今年参议院第八次提出此类决议。

    尽管包括部分共和党议员在内的国会议员都对特朗普多次部署美军感到担忧,但目前尚不清楚这项古巴战争权力决议在特朗普所在共和党以53票对47票占据多数席位的参议院中会有何种结果。

    上个月,参议院以51票对47票的结果,几乎完全沿党派路线投票否决了一项类似的古巴战争权力决议。当时共和党方面辩称,美国并未与古巴发生实际敌对行动,因此该决议没有必要。

    特朗普已通过实施燃油封锁加大了对古巴的施压力度,此举引发了持续不断的停电,并给这个岛国本已举步维艰的经济带来新的打击。

    “我国当前最不需要的,就是基于对本土的虚假威胁而发动针对古巴的政权更迭战争,这会摧毁古巴人民,并引发人为的移民危机,”凯恩在一份声明中说道。

    帕特丽夏·曾格勒报道;桑吉·米格拉尼编辑

    US Democrats push to rein in Trump on Cuba as White House steps up pressure

    2026-05-20T17:35:12.711Z / Reuters

    U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) speaks during a U.S. Senate Democratic leaders’ press conference following their weekly policy lunch, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon/File Photo

    Summary

    Backers cite Trump’s threats, reports of military planning

    • Senators argue that Cuba poses no significant threat to US
    • More Republicans concerned about Trump’s many military campaigns

    WASHINGTON, May 20 (Reuters) – A group of Democratic U.S. senators introduced a resolution to stop President Donald Trump from using the military against Cuba on Wednesday, as his administration escalated pressure on the island’s government by indicting former President Raul Castro.

    Democrats Tim Kaine of Virginia, Adam Schiff of California and Ruben Gallego of Arizona introduced a War Powers Resolution to block the use of the U.S. armed forces against the Communist-ruled island.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    They cited the Republican president’s repeated threats to send in the troops to change the government in Havana and reports that the U.S. Southern Command has been ordered to draw up attack plans, even though Cuba does not pose a significant national security threat to the U.S.

    “The U.S. military is the best in the world, but our servicemembers shouldn’t be sent into harm’s way when there’s no clear benefit to the United States,” said Kaine, a leader of efforts in Congress to enforce the Constitution’s provision that the legislature, not the president, has the power to declare war.

    In a rare rebuke to Trump, the Republican-majority Senate voted on Tuesday to advance a resolution to end the Iran war unless the administration obtains Congress’ authorization. It was the eighth time this year such a resolution was introduced in the Senate.

    Although members of Congress, including some Republicans, are concerned about Trump’s multiple deployments of U.S. forces, it was not immediately clear how a Cuba war powers resolution would fare in a chamber where Trump’s fellow Republicans hold a 53-47 majority.

    Last month, the Senate voted by 51 to 47, almost entirely along party lines, to block a similar Cuba war powers resolution. At the time, Republicans argued that there were no active U.S. hostilities against Cuba, so the resolution was unnecessary.

    Trump has increased pressure on Cuba by imposing a fuel blockade that has triggered sustained power outages and dealt fresh blows to the island’s already struggling economy.

    “The last thing that our country needs right now is a regime change war in Cuba based on imaginary threats to the homeland that would devastate the Cuban people and generate a man-made migration crisis,” Kaine said in a statement.

    Reporting by Patricia Zengerle;Editing by Sanjeev Miglani

  • 特朗普要求参议院解雇否决其舞厅融资计划的议事规则顾问


    2026-05-20T18:06:50.999Z / 《华盛顿邮报》

    此次要求提出之际,参议院共和党领袖正纠结是否要在移民机构拨款法案中纳入这项备受争议的工程的相关资金。

    2026年5月20日 美国东部时间下午2:06 | 今日美国东部时间下午2:06

    Donald Trump speaks to reporters at the construction site for the proposed White House ballroom. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    作者:艾萨克·恩斯多夫与贾雷尔·迪拉德

    在参议院议事规则顾问否决共和党将特朗普提议的白宫舞厅相关资金纳入移民执法机构拨款法案的尝试数日后,唐纳德·特朗普总统首次要求解雇该名议事规则顾问。

    Trump demands Senate fire parliamentarian who ruled against ballroom funding plan

    2026-05-20T18:06:50.999Z / The Washington Post

    The demand comes as Senate Republican leaders wrestle with whether to include money for the controversial project in a bill that funds immigration agencies.

    May 20, 2026 at 2:06 p.m. EDT Today at 2:06 p.m. EDT

    President Donald Trump speaks to reporters at the construction site for the proposed White House ballroom. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    By Isaac Arnsdorf and Jarrell Dillard

    President Donald Trump for the first time called for the firing of the Senate’s parliamentarian, days after she rejected a Republican attempt to include money related to his proposed White House ballroom in a bill that funds immigration enforcement agencies.

  • 美国共和党参议员称特朗普舞厅拨款已从支出法案中移除


    2026-05-20 19:43:21 UTC / 路透社

    作者:理查德·考恩

    2026年5月20日 美国东部时间晚上7:43 更新于13分钟前


    美国路易斯安那州共和党参议员约翰·肯尼迪2026年5月19日出席在华盛顿特区国会山举行的参议院小组委员会会议,讨论美国司法部2027财年预算提案。路透社/伊夫林·霍克斯坦 购买授权

    华盛顿,5月20日(路透社)——美国共和党参议员约翰·肯尼迪周三表示,参议院内部对拨款10亿美元用于计划中的白宫舞厅及相关安保措施的支持不足,该提案不会被纳入一项720亿美元的移民执法法案。

    在离开共和党参议员会议后对记者发表讲话时,来自路易斯安那州的肯尼迪表示:“我们被告知情况就是这样,再说一遍,我还没看过法案文本,但我们得知舞厅相关拨款已经被排除在外。”

    路透社伊朗简报通讯将为您带来伊朗局势的最新动态与分析。在此注册

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩对记者表示,他所在的53名共和党议员正试图解决“几个棘手问题”。“我认为问题与东翼翻新项目有关,”他说道。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统已下令拆除白宫东翼,将其改建为一座9万平方英尺的舞厅,他称该舞厅最多可容纳1000人就座。

    特朗普最初曾表示该项目不会动用联邦资金。但这一说法数次变更,最终国会共和党人要求从纳税人资金中拨款10亿美元,他们称这笔资金将用于舞厅及特勤局其他项目的安保升级。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    图恩表示,其中一个悬而未决的问题是,即便舞厅项目取消,特勤局约7.8亿美元的额外拨款是否仍将保留。

    过去几周,外界的关注焦点集中在民主党所称的特朗普“镀金虚荣项目”的联邦拨款争议上,而这笔720亿美元的国土安全部移民驱逐资金也在中期选举竞选拉开帷幕之际搅动了国会。

    民主党人士认为国土安全部的资金已经充足,并要求对该部门的执法行动施加新的限制,这一要求遭到了共和党人的反对。

    理查德·考恩报道,克里斯·里斯与迪帕·巴宾顿编辑

    我们的准则:汤姆森路透社信任原则。

    US Republican senator says Trump ballroom funding removed from spending bill

    2026-05-20 19:43:21 UTC / Reuters

    By Richard Cowan

    May 20, 2026 7:43 PM UTC Updated 13 mins ago

    U.S. Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) attends a Senate subcommittee on the Justice Department’s proposed 2027 budget, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 19, 2026. REUTER/Evelyn Hockstein Purchase Licensing Rights

    WASHINGTON, May 20 (Reuters) – U.S. Republican Senator John Kennedy on Wednesday said there was insufficient support in ​the Senate to spend $1 billion on a planned White House ‌ballroom and related security measures, and that the proposal would not be included in a $72 billion immigration enforcement bill.

    Speaking to reporters after leaving a meeting of Republican ​senators, Kennedy, of Louisiana, said: “We were told that, and again, I ​haven’t looked at the text, but we’re told that the ⁠ballroom money is out.”

    The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters that ​there were “a couple snags” that his 53 Republicans were trying to iron ​out. “I think there are issues related to the East Wing modernization project,” he said.

    President Donald Trump has had the East Wing of the White House demolished, to be ​replaced by a 90,000-square-foot ballroom that he says could seat up to ​1,000 people.

    Trump originally said the project would involve no federal funding. But that has ‌changed ⁠several times, culminating in congressional Republicans seeking $1 billion in taxpayer money that they argued would provide security enhancements for the ballroom and other Secret Service projects.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Thune said one of the unresolved issues was whether around $780 million ​in additional Secret ​Service spending would ⁠be maintained even if the ballroom was not going forward.

    While the controversy of spending federal money on what ​Democrats call a “gilded vanity project” for Trump has been ​the focus ⁠of attention in the past few weeks, the $72 billion for Department of Homeland Security immigrant deportations has also been roiling Congress as the midterm election ⁠campaigns ​get underway.

    Democrats argue that the DHS is ​already well funded and have demanded new restrictions on the department’s law enforcement operations, which Republicans ​have rejected.

    Reporting by Richard Cowan, editing by Chris Reese and Deepa Babington

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 为何特朗普的“反武器化”基金如此丑闻缠身


    2026-05-20T17:08:23.383Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    • 这是一个由特朗普实际掌控的政府,正为他提供豁免权。
    • 悄悄新增的条款让特朗普及其家人免受过往税务调查和审计的追责。
    • 该基金的架构赋予特朗普广泛控制权,同时可能 rewarding 包括1月6日骚乱参与者在内的盟友。

    本文由AI生成摘要,并经CNN编辑审核。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统是“奥威尔式窗口”的典型受益者。也就是说,他所做的诸多极端、打破政治惯例的行为,随着时间推移,会让原本堪称丑闻的事件显得愈发平淡无奇、不值一提。

    特朗普从联邦政府挪用数十亿美元设立“反武器化”基金一事,正是如此。这位总统曾试图让自己掌控的联邦政府向他个人支付100亿美元,但最终妥协为17.76亿美元,用于赔偿那些声称遭上一届政府不公平 targeting 的人(说白了就是特朗普的盟友)。

    协议明确表示,这笔资金不会直接流向特朗普或其家人个人。因此,此事看起来或许并不算什么大不了的事——政府向来都会向蒙受不公的当事方支付赔偿。

    但这绝非小事一桩,且存在诸多严重问题,原因有以下几点。

    周二悄悄披露的新细节进一步印证了这一点。

    美国政府未经任何宣传或公告,悄然在和解协议中加入了几项对特朗普及其身边之人极为有利的严苛条款。

    条款规定,政府“永久禁止并排除”就截至本周和解协议签署日之前的税务问题,对特朗普、其家人或其企业提起诉讼。

    若这些条款得以维持,特朗普、其家人及其企业将实质上免于受到与美国国税局待处理事项相关的“索赔”或“审查”,包括此前已提交的纳税申报单相关问题。

    这些条款是周二在周一司法部原新闻稿的超链接中悄悄补充的。

    司法部发言人娜塔莉·巴尔达萨雷为和解协议条款的补充内容辩护称,这是为了妥善解决特朗普关于其纳税申报单遭非法泄露的投诉——这也是他最初向美国国税局提起100亿美元诉讼的缘由。(2024年,一名美国国税局承包商因承认泄露特朗普及其他人的纳税申报单而获刑五年。)

    她指出,和解协议签署后,特朗普仍可能因未来的税务问题被追责。

    但这绝非常规操作。这是一个由特朗普实际掌控的政府,正为他提供豁免权。

    而历史表明,他确实非常需要这种豁免权。

    2018年,《纽约时报》在一项极为详尽的调查中披露,特朗普在20世纪90年代参与了“可疑的税务筹划,包括 outright fraud(公然欺诈)行为”。2023年,一名法官裁定特朗普及其儿子们存在欺诈行为。2024年,特朗普因篡改商业记录的34项刑事罪名被判有罪。

    《纽约时报》周二还报道称,这些条款还将让特朗普免于面临一项可能导致其损失1亿美元的专项审计。

    (特朗普在2016年总统竞选期间承诺会公开自己的纳税申报单,这也是自1980年以来每位 major-party candidate(主要政党候选人)的惯例。但后来他违背了这一承诺,声称自己的纳税申报单正在接受审计。)

    但即便在周二新增条款之前,和解协议披露的细节就已对特朗普极为有利。

    首先,尽管和解协议称特朗普及其儿子们“不会从本和解协议中获得任何经济利益”,但这并不意味着他毫无收获,恰恰相反。

    协议中提到,特朗普将“收到美国政府的正式道歉”。同样,这也绝非普通和解协议会有的内容。在这场和解中,总统实质上同时站在了协议的双方,而他正让其中一方出具官方道歉,进一步强化了自己的受害者论调。

    但更重要的是,特朗普可以利用这笔基金来偿还众多为他做尽各种事——有时甚至是违法之事——的盟友。

    这一点在2021年1月6日为特朗普武装起事的人群身上体现得最为明显。副总统JD·万斯周二拒绝排除向众多已获赦免的1月6日骚乱参与者提供经济赔偿的可能性,暗示他们中的一些人或许也遭到了“不公平对待”。

    当天保护美国国会大厦的执法人员周三提起诉讼,要求阻止该基金的实施,理由之一是该基金可能被用于资助准军事组织。

    该基金还可能惠及那些拒绝向调查人员提供可能对特朗普不利信息的人。

    例如,前特朗普竞选主席保罗·马纳福特曾与调查人员达成合作协议,随后却莫名其妙地向他们撒谎,导致自己面临额外数年的监禁。曾多次表态会为忠于自己的人提供赦免的特朗普,后来赦免了他。

    如今,为特朗普违法行事甚至还能获得现金赔偿。

    即便这笔现金从未进入特朗普的个人账户,这也会在政治上增强他的实力。想想看,这会向其他盟友传递怎样的信号:他会如何保护和奖赏自己人。

    再说说特朗普对该基金的掌控程度。

    和解协议条款规定,该基金将由五名成员管理,成员由司法部长任命——其中一名需与国会领袖协商后任命。代理司法部长托德·布兰奇是特朗普的前辩护律师,他有权单方面任命五名成员中的四名。

    更有甚者,特朗普可以“无理由”随时罢免任何一名成员。

    这意味着这些管理人员将听命于特朗普,而特朗普在很多方面已将布兰奇领导的司法部打造成了自己政治运作的工具。

    关于受资助人员的相关报告也将被列为“机密”,这实际上为政府规避了公众监督。和解协议还规定,基金成员所做的索赔、报价或其他决定“不得上诉、仲裁或接受司法审查”。

    这种集中在特朗普手中的巨大控制权,听起来与“政治献金池”(slush fund)颇为相似。

    这让人联想到他的“和平委员会”,该委员会实质上让特朗普完全掌控了由各国为讨好他而捐赠的数十亿美元资金。

    (和平委员会的章程赋予特朗普否决其通过的决议的权力,并可单方面通过“决议或其他指令……以落实和平委员会的使命”。它还规定特朗普是解释章程任何内容的“最终权威”。)

    这一举措与“反武器化”基金一样,都涉及特朗普利用其官方政府职权,迫使他人将数十亿美元资金的控制权交给他,从而在政治上增强自己的实力。

    而就该基金而言,特朗普从自己掌控的政府手中获得的和解协议,还以自身及家人的豁免权形式,为他带来了极为重要的个人利益。

    这笔钱或许没有100亿美元直接进账,但它无疑是十足的丑闻。

    Why Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund is so scandalous

    2026-05-20T17:08:23.383Z / CNN

    • This is a government that Trump controls effectively giving him immunity.
    • New terms quietly added grant Trump and his family immunity from past tax investigations and audits.
    • The fund’s structure gives Trump extensive control while potentially rewarding allies, including January 6 rioters.

    AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

    President Donald Trump is a studied beneficiary of the Overton window. That is, the many extreme and norm-busting things he does, over time, make things that would once be scandalous appear more mundane and unremarkable.

    Such is the case with Trump’s wrangling of billions of dollars from the federal government for an “anti-weaponization” fund. The president tried to get the federal government he controls to pay him $10 billion, but he’s ultimately settling for $1.776 billion for people (read: Trump’s allies) who claim they were unfairly targeted by the previous administration.

    The agreement explicitly says none of the money will go to Trump or his family personally. So, it might not seem like an especially big deal. The government pays parties it has wronged all the time.

    But it is a big deal — and highly problematic, for a number of reasons.

    New details quietly released Tuesday reinforce why.

    The government, without any fanfare or even announcement, quietly added some very serious terms to the settlement that are remarkably favorable to Trump and those around him.

    They say the government is “FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED” from bringing claims against Trump, his family or his businesses for past tax issues, up to the date of the settlement this week.

    If the terms are allowed to stand, Trump, his family and his businesses would effectively be immune from “claims” or “examinations” related to matters pending before the IRS, including in previously filed tax returns.

    The terms were quietly added Tuesday in a hyperlink to Monday’s original Justice Department press release.

    DOJ spokesperson Natalie Baldassarre defended the addition to the settlement’s terms by suggesting it was appropriate to settle Trump’s complaint about the unauthorized leaking of his tax returns — the subject of his initial $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. (An IRS contractor in 2024 pleaded guilty to leaking Trump’s and others’ tax returns and was sentenced to five years in prison.)

    She noted Trump could still be pursued for future tax issues, after the settlement date.

    But this is anything but business-as-usual. This is a government that Trump controls effectively giving him immunity.

    And it’s a type of immunity that history shows he could really use.

    The New York Times in 2018 described Trump in an extremely thorough investigation as having participated in “dubious tax schemes during the 1990s, including instances of outright fraud.” A judge in 2023 found Trump and his sons liable for fraud. Trump in 2024 was convicted on 34 criminal counts of falsifying business records.

    And the Times reported Tuesday that the terms would also spare Trump from a specific audit in which an adverse ruling could have cost him $100 million.

    (Trump as a presidential candidate in 2016 promised to release his tax returns, as every major-party candidate since 1980 had done. But then he reneged on that promise, citing being under audit.)

    But even before the new terms were added on Tuesday, the details released about the settlement were a huge boon to Trump.

    For one, while the settlement says he and his sons will “receive no economic benefit from this Settlement Agreement,” that doesn’t mean he gets nothing of value. Far from it.

    For one, it says Trump will “receive a formal apology from the United States.” Again, this isn’t a normal settlement. This is one in which the president essentially sits at the top of both sides of the agreement, and he’s getting one of those sides to register an official apology that furthers his claims of victimization.

    But the more significant aspect is that Trump can use the fund to pay off scores of allies who did all manner of things — including sometimes illegal — on his behalf.

    That’s most notably the case with those who, in many cases, literally rose up in arms for Trump on January 6, 2021. Vice President JD Vance on Tuesday declined to rule out financial payments to the many already pardoned January 6 rioters who assaulted police, suggesting some of them might too have been “mistreated.”

    Law enforcement officers who protected the US Capitol that day sued the Trump administration on Wednesday to block the implementation of the fund, arguing, in part, that it could be used to finance paramilitary organizations.

    The fund could also benefit people who declined to provide investigators information that might have hurt Trump.

    Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, for example, once cut a deal to cooperate with those investigators and then inexplicably lied to them, exposing himself to years more in prison. Trump, who’s repeatedly floated pardons for those who toe his line, later pardoned him.

    Now breaking the law in ways that benefit Trump could come with a cash payout, too.

    That empowers Trump politically, even if the cash never enters his personal bank account. Just think of the message it sends to other allies about how he will protect and reward them.

    And then there’s the level of control Trump has over the fund.

    The terms of the settlement say it’s to be run by five members who are appointed by the attorney general — including one in consultation with congressional leaders. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche is Trump’s former defense lawyer, he gets to unilaterally appoint four out of five members.

    What’s more, Trump can remove any member “without cause” at any point.

    That means these people will be answerable to Trump, who has in many ways made Blanche’s DOJ an arm of his own political operation.

    The reports about who’s being compensated are also set to be “confidential,” effectively giving the administration cover from public scrutiny. And the settlement allows “no appeal, arbitration, or judicial review of claims, offers, or other determinations made” by the fund’s members.

    It’s an immense amount of control, centralized under Trump, that sounds quite a bit like a slush fund.

    It’s reminiscent of his Board of Peace, which basically gives Trump full effective control over billions of dollars contributed by countries seeking to curry favor with him.

    (The Board of Peace’s charter gives Trump the authority to veto resolutions it passes and to unilaterally adopt “resolutions or other directives … to implement the Board of Peace’s mission.” It also makes him the “final authority” when it comes to interpreting anything in the charter.)

    That effort, like the “anti-weaponization” fund, involved Trump using his official governmental authority to compel people to give him control over a pot of billions of dollars that empowers him politically.

    And in the case of the fund, the settlement Trump got from the government he runs also gives him a hugely significant personal benefit, in the form of immunity for himself and his family.

    It might not be $10 billion in his pocket. But it’s certainly the stuff of scandal.

  • 在海岸警卫队毕业典礼上,特朗普敦促毕业生引领“国家复兴”


    2026年5月20日 美国东部时间下午1:30 / 《华盛顿邮报》

    克利夫·R·伍特森小(Cleve R. Wootson Jr.)

    康涅狄格州新伦敦电——在全球动荡加剧之际,面对即将服役的毕业生群体,唐纳德·特朗普总统周三对新晋海岸警卫队军官表示,他们将在保卫国土以及推进他所称的美国“国家复兴”方面发挥关键作用。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统周三抵达康涅狄格州新伦敦的美国海岸警卫队学院毕业典礼现场。(奇普·索莫德维拉/盖蒂图片社摄)

    At Coast Guard commencement, Trump tells grads to lead ‘national resurgence’

    2026-05-20 1:30 p.m. EDT / The Washington Post

    The president linked the force’s mission to his own priorities, domestically and in Iran, in an address at the military academy in Connecticut.

    By Cleve R. Wootson Jr.

    NEW LONDON, Conn. — Addressing a graduating class entering military service during a period of intensifying global instability, President Donald Trump told newly commissioned Coast Guard officers Wednesday that they would play a key role in both defending the homeland and advancing what he called America’s “national resurgence.”

    President Donald Trump arrives at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy commencement cereemony Wednesday in New London, Connecticut. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)