乌克兰无人机频闯波罗的海邻国领空引争议

2026年5月27日 17:57 / 联合早报

AI摘要

• 乌克兰无人机多次误入波罗的海三国领空，乌方与邻国归咎于俄电子干扰，俄则反指乌与北约国家串谋。
• 北约战机5月19日在爱沙尼亚击落一架疑属乌方无人机，系三国入盟后首次为防御发射导弹。
• 立陶宛首都维尔纽斯遭无人机逼近，议员紧急避难；乌否认刻意利用边境飞行，承诺调查俄干扰行为。
• 俄称乌军袭击致炼油厂开工率降至多年低点，正考虑限制柴油及航空燃油出口，或冲击全球油价。

本摘要由AI辅助生成，仅供参考

图为北约本月早前在另一波罗的海国家立陶宛测试新型无人机幽灵-X（Anduril Ghost-X）。 （路透社）

（维尔纽斯／斯德哥尔摩综合电）乌克兰无人机近期在打击俄罗斯时多次闯入波罗的海邻国领空，在北约邻国与基辅之间引发争议，北约与莫斯科的紧张局势也升级。

乌克兰为加大对俄罗斯的攻势，频频出动爆炸式无人机，袭击由俄罗斯负责处理近40%油气出口的波罗的海港口。多数时候，基辅和波罗的海国家均承认，闯入邻国领空的无人机来自乌克兰，并同声指责是俄罗斯使用电子防御系统扰乱信号，导致无人机误入邻国境内。

俄罗斯则反指乌克兰与波罗的海邻国串谋，利用波罗的海邻国领空来对俄罗斯发动打击。

立陶宛、拉脱维亚和爱沙尼亚三个波罗的海小国都是北约成员国，也是乌克兰的坚定支持者。爱沙尼亚外长查赫克纳向路透社说：“ 莫斯科急于利用任何机会来分化西方阵营，旨在向乌克兰施压，迫使乌克兰停止打击俄罗斯。”

虽然闯入邻国的乌克兰无人机皆未造成损坏，但已引起不安。5月19日，一架北约战机在爱沙尼亚境内打下一架疑属乌克兰的无人机。这是波罗的海三国2004年加入北约以来，北约首次“为了联盟的防御发射导弹”。

隔天，一架无人机飞向立陶宛首都维尔纽斯，迫使立陶宛国会议员躲入地下防空壕。防长考纳斯坦言，部分乌克兰无人机装载炸药，可能击中民间建筑，威胁日益加剧，“我们必须保护人民”。

有瑞典军事专家认为，乌克兰可能预见俄方会投鼠忌器，避免朝北约境内开火，因此刻意让无人机在靠近俄罗斯与波罗的海国家的边境飞行。不过，乌克兰外交部否认这个说法，坚称俄方才是祸源。

爱沙尼亚政府已要求乌克兰加强无人机管控，基辅也承诺“认真”调查俄罗斯如何让乌克兰无人机导入邻国境内。

分析认为，俄罗斯刻意将乌克兰无人机导入邻国领空的可能性的确存在，而无人机进入时未被侦测到，也暴露北约与俄罗斯、白罗斯接壤边境的防空漏洞。

乌军袭击打击炼油厂 俄考虑限制柴油航空燃油出口

俄罗斯占领的克里米亚塞瓦斯托波尔港的防空部队星期三（5月27日）清晨击落20多架乌克兰无人机。

俄方还指责乌军使用“风暴之影”导弹发动袭击。这款导弹由一家英法合资企业生产；俄罗斯此前曾召见英法两国大使，抗议乌克兰使用这种武器。

另据俄罗斯国际文传电讯社引述知情人士报道，随着乌军袭击持续升级，俄炼油厂开工率降至多年来的最低水平，俄罗斯正考虑限制柴油和航空煤油的出口。

据报，禁止出口柴油和航空燃油的决定已进入最后阶段，但尚未确定日期。如果禁令实施，将给全球石油产品价格带来压力，因为俄罗斯是主要的柴油出口国，约有40%的柴油产量销往国外市场。

Pakistan: America’s most complicated ally — and why Trump is betting on it again

May 27, 2026 5:00am EDT / Fox News

Sen Lindsey Graham says he doesn’t trust Pakistan ‘as far as I can throw them’ while Trump calls them ‘great’

By Morgan Phillips, Fox News

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

As Pakistan’s army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, emerged as a key intermediary in negotiations tied to the escalating Iran crisis, Washington once again found itself relying on a country that American officials have spent decades accusing of playing both sides in the war on terror.

Munir has emerged as a key intermediary in negotiations aimed at preventing renewed conflict with Iran, placing Pakistan — despite decades of accusations involving Taliban safe havens, nuclear proliferation and Osama bin Laden — back at the center of U.S. diplomacy in the Middle East.

The latest negotiations have again exposed one of the biggest contradictions in U.S. foreign policy: Washington keeps turning to Pakistan even after years of tension, distrust and accusations that elements of the country’s security establishment supported militant groups fighting American troops.

ISLAMABAD DENIES SHELTERING IRAN JETS, TRUMP PRAISES PAKISTAN’S MEDIATION AS ‘ABSOLUTELY GREAT’

Pakistan’s renewed diplomatic role has come under heightened scrutiny — and exposed divisions among Republicans — after allegations that Iranian military aircraft may have been moved into Pakistani territory during the recent conflict, claims Islamabad has denied.

“I don’t trust Pakistan as far as I can throw them,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said May 12. “If they actually have Iranian aircraft parked in Pakistan bases to protect Iranian military assets, that tells me maybe we should be looking for somebody else to mediate.”

Trump, however, publicly praised Pakistan’s leadership the same day.

“They’re great,” Trump told reporters May 12. “I think the Pakistanis have been great. The field marshal and the prime minister of Pakistan have been absolutely great.”

“Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir have been helpful mediators, and the United States is grateful for Pakistan’s efforts to bring an end to the conflict. When Iran’s nuclear threat is removed for good, the entire world will be safer and more stable,” White House spokesperson Olivia Wales told Fox News Digital in a statement.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf meets with chief of Defence Forces of Pakistan, Field Marshal Asim Munir, in Tehran, Iran, May 23, 2026.(Iranian Parliament Speaker Office/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via Reuters)

Where Pakistan burned the US

Pakistan has long occupied an uneasy place in American foreign policy.

The nuclear-armed country borders both Iran and Afghanistan, maintains deep ties across the region’s security landscape and has historically been viewed by U.S. officials as too strategically important to fully isolate.

Even critics who accuse Pakistan of double-dealing acknowledge Washington has struggled to disengage from Islamabad because of the country’s nuclear arsenal, geographic position and influence over regional militant networks.

But distrust between Washington and Islamabad deepened dramatically after U.S. forces killed bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in 2011 — a military town located near the country’s premier military academy.

“The fact that we had to do that operation without Pakistani support speaks volumes as to how much we trusted them,” Bill Roggio, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and editor of the Long War Journal, told Fox News Digital.

Critics and former U.S. officials long questioned whether Pakistani intelligence could have been unaware of bin Laden’s presence in Abbottabad, though Pakistan has repeatedly denied knowingly sheltering him.

Analysts say Pakistan’s military establishment also spent years viewing Afghanistan through the lens of its rivalry with India, seeing a Taliban-friendly government in Kabul as a form of strategic leverage against Indian influence in the region.

“They view Afghanistan as strategic depth,” Roggio said.

Vice President JD Vance walks with Pakistan’s Chief of Defense Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir, Deputy Prime Minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar, U.S. Embassy Charge d’Affaires Natalie A. Baker, and Interior Minister Mohsin Raza Naqvi after arriving for talks with Iranian officials in Islamabad, Pakistan, on April 11, 2026.(Jacquelyn Martin/Reuters)

Analysts say Pakistan’s security establishment historically differentiated between militant groups targeting Pakistan itself and groups viewed as useful against India or in Afghanistan — a strategy critics argue led Islamabad to tolerate or maintain ties with some Taliban-linked and anti-India groups even while cooperating with U.S. counterterrorism operations after 9/11.

Pakistani officials also have argued the country paid a heavy price for aligning with Washington after 9/11, pointing to years of suicide bombings, insurgent attacks and instability inside Pakistan itself.

Pakistan’s defense minister recently acknowledged the country had done “dirty work” for the U.S. and the West during decades of regional conflict, arguing policies tied to the anti-Soviet war in Afghanistan and the post-9/11 era ultimately destabilized Pakistan itself.

Roggio argued Pakistan’s security establishment spent years publicly cooperating with Washington while simultaneously tolerating or supporting Taliban-linked groups fighting American troops in Afghanistan.

PAKISTAN FLIP FLOPS ON TRUMP NOBEL PEACE PRIZE NOMINATION AFTER LESS THAN 24 HOURS

“Pakistan supported the Taliban knowing that they were killing Americans,” he said.

Pakistan’s latest diplomatic role has also drawn renewed scrutiny after allegations that Iranian military aircraft may have been moved into Pakistani territory during the recent conflict — claims Islamabad has denied.

Pakistan’s nuclear history has fueled concern in Washington for decades as well. Abdul Qadeer Khan, the architect of Pakistan’s nuclear program, later admitted operating a proliferation network that transferred nuclear technology and expertise to countries including Iran, Libya and North Korea.

Counterterrorism analysts and former U.S. officials have long warned that al Qaeda operatives and affiliated groups continued finding sanctuary in parts of Pakistan’s tribal regions even after the 9/11 attacks, though the scale of those networks remains debated.

Pakistani officials have long denied supporting terrorist organizations and argue the country has itself suffered heavily from Islamist violence, including attacks by ISIS-K and the Pakistani Taliban. Islamabad also has denied allegations that Iranian military aircraft were sheltered inside Pakistan during the recent conflict.

Why Trump is betting on Pakistan again

More than a decade after the bin Laden raid shattered trust between Washington and Islamabad, Pakistan’s military leadership has again emerged as a critical diplomatic channel for Washington — this time during the escalating crisis involving Iran.

Trump increasingly has engaged Munir directly in recent weeks, reinforcing longstanding perceptions that Pakistan’s military — rather than its civilian government — remains the country’s dominant power center.

Munir, a former intelligence chief, has leveraged Pakistan’s longstanding relationships across the region to position himself as a channel between Washington and Tehran.

Roggio argued Pakistan is also attempting to rehabilitate its international image by presenting itself as a stabilizing force in the region.

“They’re trying to present an image of being a purveyor of peace in the region,” he said.

Earlier rounds of diplomacy tied to the Iran conflict were also hosted in Islamabad, elevating Pakistan’s role as a regional intermediary.

Pakistan and Qatar appear to have emerged as complementary diplomatic channels rather than competing ones during the latest negotiations involving Iran.

Analysts say Pakistan’s military leadership has increasingly positioned itself as a political and security intermediary between Washington and Tehran, while Qatar has remained central to the more formal diplomatic and financial dimensions of regional negotiations.

This is a locator map for Pakistan with its capital, Islamabad, and the Kashmir region.

Qatar, which hosted negotiations between the U.S. and the Taliban that led to the 2020 Doha agreement laying out the framework for the eventual U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, has again emerged as a central diplomatic channel as talks intensified over the weekend.

Pakistan also played a behind-the-scenes role in those negotiations, reflecting Washington’s longstanding reliance on Islamabad’s ties to the Taliban leadership during the Afghanistan war.

Critics of the Doha agreement argued it sidelined the U.S.-backed Afghan government while strengthening the Taliban ahead of its return to power in 2021.

Pakistan’s relationship with the Taliban also has become increasingly strained since the group returned to power in Afghanistan. Pakistani officials have accused Taliban authorities of failing to stop militants launching attacks into Pakistan from across the border, and Islamabad has threatened military action against some groups operating near Afghan territory.

The divide over Pakistan reflects a broader debate that has shaped U.S. foreign policy for decades: whether Washington’s strategic need for Islamabad outweighs longstanding concerns over the country’s relationships with militant groups and regional adversaries.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

More than a decade after the bin Laden raid shattered trust between Washington and Islamabad, Pakistan has once again become a diplomatic channel the U.S. appears unable — or unwilling — to avoid during one of the region’s most volatile crises.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6396666087112

乌克兰无人机频闯波罗的海邻国领空引争议

2026年5月27日 17:57 / 联合早报

图为北约本月早前在另一波罗的海国家立陶宛测试新型无人机幽灵-X（Anduril Ghost-X）。 （路透社）

（维尔纽斯／斯德哥尔摩综合电）乌克兰无人机近期在打击俄罗斯时多次闯入波罗的海邻国领空，在北约邻国与基辅之间引发争议，北约与莫斯科的紧张局势也升级。

乌克兰为加大对俄罗斯的攻势，频频出动爆炸式无人机，袭击由俄罗斯负责处理近40%油气出口的波罗的海港口。多数时候，基辅和波罗的海国家均承认，闯入邻国领空的无人机来自乌克兰，并同声指责是俄罗斯使用电子防御系统扰乱信号，导致无人机误入邻国境内。

俄罗斯则反指乌克兰与波罗的海邻国串谋，利用波罗的海邻国领空来对俄罗斯发动打击。

立陶宛、拉脱维亚和爱沙尼亚三个波罗的海小国都是北约成员国，也是乌克兰的坚定支持者。爱沙尼亚外长查赫克纳向路透社说：“ 莫斯科急于利用任何机会来分化西方阵营，旨在向乌克兰施压，迫使乌克兰停止打击俄罗斯。”

虽然闯入邻国的乌克兰无人机皆未造成损坏，但已引起不安。5月19日，一架北约战机在爱沙尼亚境内打下一架疑属乌克兰的无人机。这是波罗的海三国2004年加入北约以来，北约首次“为了联盟的防御发射导弹”。

隔天，一架无人机飞向立陶宛首都维尔纽斯，迫使立陶宛国会议员躲入地下防空壕。防长考纳斯坦言，部分乌克兰无人机装载炸药，可能击中民间建筑，威胁日益加剧，“我们必须保护人民”。

有瑞典军事专家认为，乌克兰可能预见俄方会投鼠忌器，避免朝北约境内开火，因此刻意让无人机在靠近俄罗斯与波罗的海国家的边境飞行。不过，乌克兰外交部否认这个说法，坚称俄方才是祸源。

爱沙尼亚政府已要求乌克兰加强无人机管控，基辅也承诺“认真”调查俄罗斯如何让乌克兰无人机导入邻国境内。

分析认为，俄罗斯刻意将乌克兰无人机导入邻国领空的可能性的确存在，而无人机进入时未被侦测到，也暴露北约与俄罗斯、白罗斯接壤边境的防空漏洞。

乌军袭击打击炼油厂 俄考虑限制柴油航空燃油出口

俄罗斯占领的克里米亚塞瓦斯托波尔港的防空部队星期三（5月27日）清晨击落20多架乌克兰无人机。

俄方还指责乌军使用“风暴之影”导弹发动袭击。这款导弹由一家英法合资企业生产；俄罗斯此前曾召见英法两国大使，抗议乌克兰使用这种武器。

另据俄罗斯国际文传电讯社引述知情人士报道，随着乌军袭击持续升级，俄炼油厂开工率降至多年来的最低水平，俄罗斯正考虑限制柴油和航空煤油的出口。

据报，禁止出口柴油和航空燃油的决定已进入最后阶段，但尚未确定日期。如果禁令实施，将给全球石油产品价格带来压力，因为俄罗斯是主要的柴油出口国，约有40%的柴油产量销往国外市场。

How Donald Trump is insulating himself from future investigations

2026-05-27T10:00:08.598Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/27/politics/donald-trump-insulating-himself-future-investigations

• Trump’s deal creating an “anti-weaponization fund” could shield him from probes beyond tax matters and incentivize people to defy congressional investigations.
• Trump is firing inspectors general and challenging post-Watergate laws that require document preservation and congressional oversight.
• Legal scholars say Trump is dismantling post-Watergate oversight mechanisms as the midterm elections approach.

AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

The deal that President Donald Trump reached with his own administration to set-up an “anti-weaponization fund” for his allies is the latest example of how his second stint in the White House has focused on undermining checks on presidential power and insulating himself from future investigations.

The agreement highlights the new hurdles Trump is erecting that that could stymie probes by congressional Democrats, successor administrations and even authorities outside the federal government.

On several fronts, Trump is dismantling post-Watergate transparency mandates, attacking Congress’ power of the purse, rewarding loyalists accused of committing crimes that support his causes, and assaulting independent agencies and executive branch watchdogs.

Trump has done so by capitalizing on and accelerating an expansion of presidential power embraced by the conservative Supreme Court, and by blowing through norms and political gravity that reined in other presidents, former government attorneys and constitutional scholars told CNN.

When Congress in the 1970s passed constraints on the presidency in response to the scandals of the Richard Nixon administration, courts at the time backed those laws.

“What we’ve now seen is this dramatic pendulum swing in favor of just more executive power that’s consolidated within the president himself, that’s no longer dispersed,” said University of Southern California Gould School of Law Professor Adam Zimmerman. “We also see someone who’s willing to use that power to push that power to the limit.”

https://www.cnn.com/

Could Trump’s foes benefit from “anti-weaponization” fund?
3:22

The latest gambit – a controversial agreement arising from a legally dubious lawsuit Trump brought against the IRS – is more sweeping in its protections for the president than initially reported. Its language could shield Trump from more than just tax-related probes. And the broad criteria for whom could benefit from the nearly $1.8 billion fund could incentivize individuals to not comply with congressional investigations into the president.

“The announcement of this fund really crystallizes so many trends we’ve seen in this term, which is the president using, corruptly using, the power of the government to punish his enemies and reward his friends, including friends who would break the law on his behalf,” said Gregg Nunziata, executive director of the Society for the Rule of Law, an organization of conservatives who oppose Trump.

A Justice Department spokesperson defended the fund in a statement that said it “was created to specifically hear and redress claims of lawfare and seek accountability for any American who was unfairly targeted for their beliefs.”

“Those who are upset about the Anti-Weaponization Fund should remind themselves that we are in this position because the President’s tax returns were illegally leaked, and previous administrations used their law enforcement agencies to relentlessly persecute their political adversaries,” the spokesperson said.

The tax amnesty the new deal extends to the president, his business and his family was made public with an addendum quietly published the day after the original agreement was announced. In defending it, DOJ officials have described the arrangement as the IRS letting go of past audits of the president in exchange for a dismissal of the $10 billion case Trump brought against the federal government for improper disclosure of his tax returns.

“Every single settlement, both sides give away something,” acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who signed the deal and who was Trump’s personal lawyer during the Biden-era criminal prosecutions against him, told CNN last week.

The language applies not just to potential claims against Trump brought by IRS or Treasury, but by any agency, though the Justice Department clarified to CNN that the focus is on civil matters, rather than criminal. The Department has also stressed that the agreement covers audits or claims related to Trump conduct that predates the May 19 agreement.

But the deal’s language forbids not just tax-related reviews, but any government claims related to Trump pre-settlement conduct that fits under the agreement’s conception of “lawfare” or “weaponization.”

Those terms have no legal meaning, but another part of the agreement defines those concepts in extremely broad terms, meaning the deal seeks to forbid all sorts of federal enforcement actions or reviews that could be aimed at past conduct by Trump, his family or his businesses.

Carrots and sticks for participation in probes into Trump

Already, Trump and his Justice Department have punished those who facilitated investigations into his conduct, while wiping away the prosecutions of his supporters.

“He’s sending the signal louder every day, that if you commit a crime on his behalf, you have nothing to worry about. In fact, you’ll be celebrated, and perhaps rewarded financially,” said Nunziata, who previously served as a lawyer in several Republican Senate offices.

Capitol riot prosecutors and DOJ employees involved in former special counsel Jack Smith’s investigations were fired. The Justice Department dismissed the contempt-of-Congress case against former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, for his defiance of a House January 6 probe subpoena. Former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James – both the faces of high-profile investigations into Trump – have been targeted with criminal charges.

Trump granted clemency to everyone charged or convicted in the Capitol attack, and now top administration officials are not ruling out those defendants – including those convicted of assaulting law enforcement – receiving payouts from the new fund.

“It’s fair to say that this administration uses a lot of sticks and a lot of carrots,” Zimmerman said, calling the president’s pardon power “an extremely large carrot” and the new fund “carrot cake.”

Zimmerman, who worked on the compensation fund for victims of the 9/11 terrorist attack, pointed to the influence Trump will have over the commission that doles out compensation. The president can fire at will the board’s members, who will be chosen by his attorney general.

“It is a completely fair concern that this could be part of a significant set of incentives for people not to potentially participate in future government investigations, or even the legislative hearings that, we might imagine, would take place if the Democrats took the House or the Senate,” Zimmerman said.

When Trump returned to the White House in January 2025, he did so with the benefit of a sweeping 2023 presidential immunity precedent from the Supreme Court that wasn’t on the books for his first term. That Supreme Cout case dealt with Trump’s immunity in criminal prosecutions of conduct that could be connected to official presidential acts. But the Justice Department is also now pushing back against the civil lawsuits against the president related to the January 6 assault on the US Capitol.

Meanwhile, DOJ is working on regulations that would sideline investigations by state bar associations into department lawyers for attorney disciplinary proceedings.

When those proceedings were brought against attorneys who worked on Trump’s 2020 election reversal plots, they revealed new details about how the schemes played out. The outside groups that have filed the bar complaints against Trump-aligned attorneys have argued the proceedings will discourage lawyers from breaking ethics rules to help the president. But the administration and its allies, and even some Trump critics, argue that the ethics proceedings amount to an abuse of a disciplinary process.

The Justice Department – defending its proposal to suspend state bar investigations while its own disciplinary proceedings are underway – argues that because it has its own ethics and professional responsibility team, the agency should have the ability to review its own employees’ conduct first.

As the administration has sought to blunt investigations that could touch on the president, it’s barreled through the post-Watergate reforms that created internal checks and oversight mechanisms within the executive branch.

At the beginning of his second term, the president fired several inspectors general, who are tasked by Congress with investigating fraud, waste and abuse within their agencies. Those offices were the source of multiple probes that scrutinized the conduct of the first Trump administration and led to congressional investigations, including the 2019 impeachment proceedings against the president.

Earlier this year, a Justice Department office charged with giving legal advice to the executive branch told the president he was no longer obligated to follow the Presidential Records Act, which requires that White House documents be preserved and ultimately turned over to the National Archives for public use.

Under the DOJ’s theory for the law’s supposed unconstitutionality – a theory a federal judge has already rejected – Congress could never pass a statute that would “encroach” on the performance of a president’s executive power. The DOJ’s memo cast doubt on the idea that Congress could have a “legitimate” reason to study the inner-workings of a White House for the purpose of drafting laws.

The administration’s challenge of statutes that serve as a check on the presidency is in step with a shift under the Supreme Court in favor of the so-called “unitary executive” theory of presidential power.

The conservative majority – three members of which Trump appointed – has let Trump remove without cause heads of ostensibly independent agencies, trampling over limits placed by Congress. The Supreme Court is now considering a case that could decide on the merits the scope of a president’s firing powers.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority last year also gave the administration the greenlight in an emergency order to withhold $4 billion in foreign aid funding – diminishing another check that Congress has on the presidency.

The new anti-weaponization fund fits “within a pattern of looking for ways to be able to spend money without Congress, to get greater executive control over federal spending,” said Zachary Price, a constitutional law professor and University of California San Francisco Law School.

Ironically, in its pushback to oversight from the Democratic House during Trump first presidency, the administration argued that courts need not order compliance with congressional subpoenas because lawmakers could use their spending powers to encourage participation in the probes. Now, if Democrats regain the gavel after the midterms, their tools for constraining the president will be weaker than what they had at their disposal with the 2019 House takeover.

“It takes a certain amount of honorable conduct for our government to work,’” said Doug Letter, a former longtime DOJ attorney who then served as general counsel for the Democratic-led US House in Trump’s first term.

Trump’s conduct goes “so far beyond what anybody thought when putting together the Constitution and our system of government,” Letter said. “I am not sure what the real check is, other than impeachment.”

CNN’s Marshall Cohen contributed to this report.

欧盟正式批准与美国贸易协议 移交议会表决

2026年5月27日 18:05 / 联合早报

欧盟27个成员国正式批准与欧洲议会达成的一项妥协方案，以落实与美国的贸易协议。该协议目前仅需欧洲议会最终批准即可生效。

法新社报道，星期三（5月27日）在布鲁塞尔举行的外交官会议正式批准这个方案。相关立法文本预计将提交6月中旬举行的欧洲议会全会进行最终表决，随后由欧盟理事会批准。

欧盟与美国于去年7月达成贸易协议，核心内容包括欧盟暂停对所有美国工业品的关税，并对大量进入欧盟市场的美国农食产品建立关税配额制度，以换取美国对大多数欧盟输美商品征收15%的关税。

由于美国索要丹麦自治领地格陵兰岛引发欧美关系紧张，加上美国最高法院裁定特朗普政府大规模关税政策违法，欧盟对欧美贸易协议的批准经历数月延迟。

不过，上周欧盟各国和议员们达成一项妥协方案，使欧盟有望在7月4日特朗普设定的最后期限前落实该协议，否则将面临惩罚性的新关税。

欧盟与美国于去年7月达成贸易协议，核心内容包括欧盟暂停对所有美国工业品的关税，但欧盟仍未履行承诺。 （路透社档案照片）

这项妥协方案为取消欧盟关税附加了保障措施，以防美国违背承诺。但这些保障措施较最初的要求有所缩减，以避免与白宫再次产生紧张关系。

协议中一项所谓的“日落条款”被显著推迟至2029年底，即特朗普任期结束后。

协议文本也给予美国在年底前取消对钢铁零部件征收的15%以上额外关税的宽限期，而非像议会希望的那样将这个作为先决条件。

一项所谓的“日出条款”也被删除。这项条款规定，只有在美国履行承诺后，欧盟方面的协议才会生效。

欧盟与美国于去年7月达成贸易协议，核心内容包括欧盟暂停对所有美国工业品的关税，但欧盟仍未履行承诺。 （路透社档案照片）

欧盟27个成员国正式批准与欧洲议会达成的一项妥协方案，以落实与美国的贸易协议。该协议目前仅需欧洲议会最终批准即可生效。

法新社报道，星期三（5月27日）在布鲁塞尔举行的外交官会议正式批准这个方案。相关立法文本预计将提交6月中旬举行的欧洲议会全会进行最终表决，随后由欧盟理事会批准。

欧盟与美国于去年7月达成贸易协议，核心内容包括欧盟暂停对所有美国工业品的关税，并对大量进入欧盟市场的美国农食产品建立关税配额制度，以换取美国对大多数欧盟输美商品征收15%的关税。

由于美国索要丹麦自治领地格陵兰岛引发欧美关系紧张，加上美国最高法院裁定特朗普政府大规模关税政策违法，欧盟对欧美贸易协议的批准经历数月延迟。

不过，上周欧盟各国和议员们达成一项妥协方案，使欧盟有望在7月4日特朗普设定的最后期限前落实该协议，否则将面临惩罚性的新关税。

这项妥协方案为取消欧盟关税附加了保障措施，以防美国违背承诺。但这些保障措施较最初的要求有所缩减，以避免与白宫再次产生紧张关系。

协议中一项所谓的“日落条款”被显著推迟至2029年底，即特朗普任期结束后。

协议文本也给予美国在年底前取消对钢铁零部件征收的15%以上额外关税的宽限期，而非像议会希望的那样将这个作为先决条件。

一项所谓的“日出条款”也被删除。这项条款规定，只有在美国履行承诺后，欧盟方面的协议才会生效。

伊朗指美国“弱” 再次开战可能性低

2026年5月27日 18:29 / 联合早报

周二在德黑兰，一名民众走过街上的反美以壁画，画中描绘了伊朗导弹击中一艘航空母舰的场景。 （法新社）

（华盛顿/德黑兰综合电）美国打击伊朗南部虽招致德黑兰的报复威胁，但伊朗军方称，战事不太可能会重启。不过，伊朗也表明，已做好应战准备。

塔斯尼姆通讯社周三（5月27日）引述伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队海军政治副司令阿克巴尔扎德的话说：“由于敌人力量薄弱，发生战争的可能性很低，（伊朗）武装部队已装满弹匣，严阵以待。”

美军中央司令部周一（25日）宣布，对伊朗南部目标实施了自卫打击。伊朗革命卫队过后恫言，将对任何违反停火的行为做出果断的对等回应。

《纽约时报》周二（26日）引述匿名美国官员报道，美军在发动袭击前发现，伊朗采取了一系列可能构成威胁的军事行动，这才决定先发制人。

据报道，美军在此前24小时里击沉了革命卫队的两艘快艇，这两艘快艇被指试图在霍尔木兹海峡布设水雷。

据悉，伊朗也在20多艘美国海军军舰附近，发射单向攻击无人机。这些军舰部署在阿曼湾与阿拉伯海，执行对伊朗的海上封锁。

美军情报分析人员还发现，霍尔木兹海峡附近的伊朗地对空导弹基地有活动迹象，可能对执行封锁任务的美国陆基和舰载攻击机构成威胁。

美军中央司令部周二受询时拒绝就这一报道置评，仅强调美军正继续自卫，同时保持克制。

司令部当天也在社交媒体上驳斥有关美国已重启“自由计划”的报道，称美军目前没有在霍尔木兹海峡为商船护航。

《纽时》引述美国官员与独立分析员的话说，在美伊寻求敲定停战协议之际，伊朗军方可能想要试探美方反应，以确定它能否有更大的行动空间。

随着美伊谈判进入关键时刻，特朗普定周三召开全体内阁会议，伊朗战争与美国经济料是主要议题。此次会议地点原定为马里兰州的戴维营，但因天气原因改为白宫。

以色列持续空袭黎巴嫩

另一方面，以色列持续空袭黎巴嫩，同时扩大在黎巴嫩南部的地面行动，这可能不利于美伊达成协议。

路透社引述黎巴嫩安全消息人士报道，以色列周二对黎巴嫩实施了超过120次空袭。以色列总理内坦亚胡当天说：“我们正加强在黎巴嫩的行动。以色列国防已部署大量地面部队，控制具有战略意义的制高点。”

以军证实，在黎巴嫩南部的地面行动已扩大至指定安全区之外，以进一步把真主党逼向黎巴嫩北部，降低真主党无人机袭击对以色列北部社区的威胁。

黎巴嫩媒体报道，以军周二的空袭造成至少31人死亡、40人受伤，黎巴嫩东部重要的盖劳恩水坝附近地区也遭到至少三次空袭。

王毅在安理会上呼吁各方坚定停火止战

中国外长王毅周二呼吁战争当事方坚定停火止战，继续相向而行，尽快让和平重回中东大地。

王毅当天主持联合国安理会会议后告诉媒体，当前局势的关键是美伊谈判，中方支持相关努力。他说：“冰冻三尺，非一日之寒；化解宿怨，也非一日之功。但谈判每前进一步，和平就多一分希望。”

伊朗指美国“弱” 再次开战可能性低

2026年5月27日 18:29 / 联合早报

周二在德黑兰，一名民众走过街上的反美以壁画，画中描绘了伊朗导弹击中一艘航空母舰的场景。 （法新社）

（华盛顿/德黑兰综合电）美国打击伊朗南部虽招致德黑兰的报复威胁，但伊朗军方称，战事不太可能会重启。不过，伊朗也表明，已做好应战准备。

塔斯尼姆通讯社周三（5月27日）引述伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队海军政治副司令阿克巴尔扎德的话说：“由于敌人力量薄弱，发生战争的可能性很低，（伊朗）武装部队已装满弹匣，严阵以待。”

美军中央司令部周一（25日）宣布，对伊朗南部目标实施了自卫打击。伊朗革命卫队过后恫言，将对任何违反停火的行为做出果断的对等回应。

《纽约时报》周二（26日）引述匿名美国官员报道，美军在发动袭击前发现，伊朗采取了一系列可能构成威胁的军事行动，这才决定先发制人。

据报道，美军在此前24小时里击沉了革命卫队的两艘快艇，这两艘快艇被指试图在霍尔木兹海峡布设水雷。

据悉，伊朗也在20多艘美国海军军舰附近，发射单向攻击无人机。这些军舰部署在阿曼湾与阿拉伯海，执行对伊朗的海上封锁。

美军情报分析人员还发现，霍尔木兹海峡附近的伊朗地对空导弹基地有活动迹象，可能对执行封锁任务的美国陆基和舰载攻击机构成威胁。

美军中央司令部周二受询时拒绝就这一报道置评，仅强调美军正继续自卫，同时保持克制。

司令部当天也在社交媒体上驳斥有关美国已重启“自由计划”的报道，称美军目前没有在霍尔木兹海峡为商船护航。

《纽时》引述美国官员与独立分析员的话说，在美伊寻求敲定停战协议之际，伊朗军方可能想要试探美方反应，以确定它能否有更大的行动空间。

随着美伊谈判进入关键时刻，特朗普定周三召开全体内阁会议，伊朗战争与美国经济料是主要议题。此次会议地点原定为马里兰州的戴维营，但因天气原因改为白宫。

以色列持续空袭黎巴嫩

另一方面，以色列持续空袭黎巴嫩，同时扩大在黎巴嫩南部的地面行动，这可能不利于美伊达成协议。

路透社引述黎巴嫩安全消息人士报道，以色列周二对黎巴嫩实施了超过120次空袭。以色列总理内坦亚胡当天说：“我们正加强在黎巴嫩的行动。以色列国防已部署大量地面部队，控制具有战略意义的制高点。”

以军证实，在黎巴嫩南部的地面行动已扩大至指定安全区之外，以进一步把真主党逼向黎巴嫩北部，降低真主党无人机袭击对以色列北部社区的威胁。

黎巴嫩媒体报道，以军周二的空袭造成至少31人死亡、40人受伤，黎巴嫩东部重要的盖劳恩水坝附近地区也遭到至少三次空袭。

王毅在安理会上呼吁各方坚定停火止战

中国外长王毅周二呼吁战争当事方坚定停火止战，继续相向而行，尽快让和平重回中东大地。

王毅当天主持联合国安理会会议后告诉媒体，当前局势的关键是美伊谈判，中方支持相关努力。他说：“冰冻三尺，非一日之寒；化解宿怨，也非一日之功。但谈判每前进一步，和平就多一分希望。”

Trump lashes out at Biden over suing DOJ to hide interview audio files

May 27, 2026 7:23am EDT / Fox News

Biden’s lawyers filed suit in Washington federal court to prevent audio and transcripts from reaching Congress

By Bradford Betz Fox News

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett discusses former President Joe Biden’s reported efforts to prevent the release of classified information tapes and former FBI Director James Comey’s indictment on ‘Hannity.’

President Donald Trump lashed out at former President Joe Biden late Tuesday after his predecessor sued the Justice Department to block the release of audio recordings and transcripts tied to the special counsel investigation into his handling of classified documents.

“A Crooked Politician!!!” Trump wrote on Truth Social while sharing a Just the News article about Biden’s lawsuit against the DOJ.

Biden sued the Justice Department on Tuesday in an effort to block the release of audio recordings and transcripts of the former president’s interview with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer that were obtained by special counsel Robert Hur during his classified documents investigation.

Biden’s lawyers said in the lawsuit that the Justice Department plans to release the files to Congress and the conservative Heritage Foundation after previously arguing that they were exempt from disclosure under federal public records law.

BIDEN REPEATEDLY SAYS ‘I DON’T REMEMBER’ REGARDING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN NEWLY RELEASED HUR INTERVIEW AUDIO

President Donald Trump blasted his predecessor, former President Joe Biden, who sued to block the release of audio recordings and transcripts of his interview with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer(Kenny Holston-Pool/Getty Images)

According to the filing, Biden’s attorneys argued that disclosure would “constitute an unwarranted invasion of President Biden’s privacy.”

“Every American, including a sitting or former Vice President, has a right to privacy in the personal conversations he has within his own home,” Biden’s attorneys wrote in the lawsuit. “And when the U.S. Department of Justice obtains that private information through a criminal investigation, the Department bears a particular responsibility to protect it from disclosure.”

President Donald Trump criticized former President Joe Biden’s economic record while in office.(Evan Vucci/AP)

At issue in the case are audio recordings and transcripts of Biden’s interviews at his home in 2016 and 2017 with Zwonitzer, who worked with Biden on his two memoirs.

BIDEN STRUGGLES WITH WORDS, KEY MEMORIES IN LEAKED AUDIO FROM SPECIAL COUNSEL HUR INTERVIEW

The files were scrutinized by Hur as part of his investigation into Biden’s improper retention of classified documents from his time as a senator and vice president.

Hur’s yearlong investigation resulted in a 345-page report that questioned Biden’s age and mental competence but recommended no criminal charges against the then-81-year-old. Hur said he found insufficient evidence to successfully prosecute a case in court.

President Joe Biden delivers remarks on the verdict in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial and on the Middle East from the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington on May 31, 2024.(Evan Vucci/AP)

Biden has separately fought the release of audio from his interview with Hur. The House in 2024 voted to hold then-Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over that audio after the White House asserted executive privilege.

Transcripts of Biden’s interviews with federal prosecutors were released last year. While Biden insisted he treated classified information seriously, the transcripts showed he was at times fuzzy about dates and details and said he was unfamiliar with the paper trail for some of the sensitive documents he handled.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Republicans have argued Biden was being given a pass by his own Justice Department and that Trump had been unfairly victimized by prosecutors. Democrats, meanwhile, emphasized Biden’s cooperation with investigators and contrasted it with the criminal case against Trump, who was accused of refusing to return classified documents requested by the National Archives that were stored at his Florida estate.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Bradford Betz is a Fox News Digital breaking reporter covering crime, political issues,and much more.

GOP lawmaker faces criticism at fiery town hall in Nebraska

2026-05-27 6:50 AM EDT / CNN

GOP lawmaker faces criticism at fiery town hall in Nebraska

Nebraska GOP Rep. Mike Flood said President Donald Trump’s “anti-weaponization” fund should not be used for rioters who were at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, during a town hall in his district where he was repeatedly pressed on his support of the president’s agenda. CNN affiliate KMTV was on the scene.

1:44 • Source: KMTV