博客

Iran agrees in principle to dispose of highly-enriched uranium, White House official says

May 24, 2026 / 11:43 AM EDT / CBS News

By Jennifer Jacobs, Jennifer Jacobs Senior White House reporter

Jennifer Jacobs is a senior White House reporter at CBS News.

Jennifer Jacobs, Sara Cook

Sara Cook is a White House producer and multi-platform reporter for CBS News. She has covered three presidential campaigns and the Obama, Biden, and Trump administrations.

Iran has agreed in principle to dispose of highly-enriched uranium in negotiations with the U.S., although a deal likely won’t be signed this weekend, a senior Trump administration official said Sunday morning.

The official said the U.S. believes Iran’s supreme leader has approved the template for a deal, but a final agreement still needs to be made before anything is signed.

The U.S. wants Iran to commit to disposing of highly enriched uranium and to resolving other nuclear issues, the official said. The official said the administration believes this is a better deal than the 2015 deal agreed upon under former President Barack Obama, which allowed nuclear enrichment up to a certain level.

Officials were still working through details of the mechanism for how the uranium would be disposed of with the people who have been empowered by the supreme leader to negotiate.

Neither side disputes that stockpiled enriched material will be disposed of, it’s a question of how at this point, the official said.

As a condition of the deal, the U.S. would lift its blockade on ships entering and exiting Iranian ports. There would be coordination between U.S. Central Command and Gulf countries to ensure ships can pass safely, but that coordination should not be understood as a tolling system, the official said.

Vice President JD Vance, Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner have been involved in the negotiations. The U.S. is trying to involve every Middle Eastern ally, the official said.

Mr. Trump said Saturday that the peace deal is “largely negotiated,” but he posted on social media one day later that he told his representatives “not to rush into a deal” and “time is on our side.”

美国总统特朗普星期天（5月24日）在社媒Truth Social发文说：“在达成、认证并签署协议之前，（海上）封锁将继续全面有效。双方都必须谨慎行事，确保万无一失。” （法新社档案照片）

美国总统特朗普说，他已告知外交代表不要仓促与伊朗达成协议，因为“时间站在我们这边”。

特朗普星期天（5月24日）在社媒Truth Social发文说：“在达成、认证并签署协议之前，（海上）封锁将继续全面有效。双方都必须谨慎行事，确保万无一失。”

他也说：“绝不能出错！我们与伊朗的关系正变得更加专业和富有成效。”

White House blasts Cruz, Pompeo for trashing Trump peace efforts as Iran appeasement

2026-05-24T09:42:05-04:00 / Fox News

White House official says critics have ‘no idea’ what they’re talking about on Iran negotiations

By Eric Mack Fox News

Published May 24, 2026 9:42am EDT | Updated May 24, 2026 10:19am EDT

Trump discusses possible Iran peace deal after White House talks

Fox News correspondent Alex Hogan reports on President Donald Trump’s calls with regional leaders and optimism surrounding a possible diplomatic resolution to the Iran conflict on ‘Fox Report.’

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

While President Donald Trump was burning the midnight oil hammering out a last-minute peace and denuclearization deal with Iran, his White House inner circle was hammering critics from the right for either working to “undermine” peace efforts or “illegally” abusing residual security clearance.

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, a Fox News contributor, and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, received X criticism from some of Trump’s top inner circle advisors, including White House communications director Steven Cheung, deputy assistant on counterterror Sebastian Gorka and outside political advisor Alex Bruesewitz.

“Mike Pompeo has no idea what the f— he’s talking about,” Cheung wrote in a scathing X post Saturday night. “He should shut his stupid mouth and leave the real work to the professionals. He’s not read into anything that’s happening, so how would he know.”

Trump himself finally weighed in on the latest peace talks Sunday morning, rebuking his predecessors along with his current critics.

TOP REPUBLICAN WARNS TRUMP AGAINST MAKING A DEAL WITH IRAN: ‘FINISH THE JOB’

“One of the worst deals ever made by our Country was the Iran Nuclear Deal, put forth and signed into existence by Barack Hussein Obama and the rank amateurs of the Obama Administration. It was a direct path to Iran developing a Nuclear Weapon,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Not so with the transaction currently being negotiated with Iran by the Trump Administration – THE EXACT OPPOSITE, in fact!

“The negotiations are proceeding in an orderly and constructive manner, and I have informed my representatives not to rush into a deal in that time is on our side. The Blockade will remain in full force and effect until an agreement is reached, certified, and signed. Both sides must take their time and get it right. There can be no mistakes!

“Our relationship with Iran is becoming a much more professional and productive one. They must understand, however, that they cannot develop or procure a Nuclear Weapon or Bomb.”

The Pompeo post that drew the White House ire suggested an impending Trump deal would wind up being an Obama-era-esque capitulation to Iran’s ongoing nuclear weapons aspirations.

MORNING GLORY: PRESIDENT TRUMP MUST REJECT A SECOND MUNICH AND HOLD FIRM AGAIN IRAN

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo served under President Donald Trump’s first administration and expressed concern that a pending peace deal with Iran might return the U.S. to an appeasement policy that Trump once denounced after former President Barack Obama’s and Joe Biden’s administrations.(Chip Somodevilla/AFP)

“The deal being floated with Iran seems straight out of the Wendy Sherman-Robert Malley-Ben Rhodes playbook: Pay the IRGC to build a WMD program and terrorize the world,” Pompeo wrote on X. “Not remotely America First.”

“It’s straightforward: Open the damned strait.Deny Iran access to money.Take out enough Iranian capability so it cannot threaten our allies in the region.

“Overdue. Let’s go.”

MIKE POMPEO: TRUMP’S IRAN STRIKES SHOW WORLD WHAT ‘AMERICA FIRST’ FOREIGN POLICY LOOKS LIKE

Gorka, while confirming nothing from Pompeo’s post, did suggest the former secretary of state might be “illegally” abusing his residual high security clearance.

“You have no knowledge of what is being negotiated in secret,” Gorka wrote on X. “If you did, you would be in possession of information illegally provided to you and which you are wholly unauthorized to have or to share.”

“So are you a liar or a criminal Pompeo?” Gorka asked.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio weighed in Sunday morning with a further rebuke of critics of the Trump administration’s peace-making efforts.

WHY IRAN TALKS ARE IN LIMBO AS TRUMP SCRAMBLES FOR A WAY OUT OF THE WAR HE STARTED

“The idea that somehow this president, given everything he’s already proven he’s willing to do, is going to somehow agree to a deal that ultimately winds up putting Iran in a stronger position when it comes to nuclear ambitions is absurd,” Rubio said. “That’s just not going to happen.

“But our preference is to address this through diplomatic means, and that’s what we’re endeavoring to do here.”

IRAN’S PRESIDENT FINALLY CAVES TO TRUMP, MAKES MAJOR ADMISSION ABOUT NUCLEAR WEAPONS

Rubio admitted he remains only “cautiously” optimistic Iran will put its words on paper into “action.”

“You can agree to things on paper,” he continued. “They actually have to be implemented. You can agree to things in writing and then you actually have to go out and do it.”

Cruz also received blowback for a post suggesting Trump’s peace efforts would come up short because of releasing “billions of dollars” to the Iranian regime.

“I am deeply concerned about what we are hearing about an Iran ‘deal,’ being pushed by some voices in the administration,” Cruz wrote Saturday on X. “President Trump’s decision to strike Iran was the most consequential decision of his second term. He was right to do so, and we achieved extraordinary military results — including destroying all of their missiles & drones and sinking their entire navy.

MORNING GLORY: TRUMP SHOULD DEMAND A CLEAR VICTORY OVER IRAN AND REJECT WEAK COMPROMISES

“If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant “death to America” — now receiving billions of dollars, being able to enrich uranium & develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake.

“The details are still coming out — and I pray the early reports are wrong — but the fact that Biden’s Rob Malley is praising the deal is not encouraging.

“President Trump believes in peace through strength, and his strong leadership has already made America much safer. He should continue to hold the line, defend America & enforce the red lines he has repeatedly drawn.”

That drew criticism from one of Trump’s outside political advisors in Bruesewitz.

ISRAEL-IRAN WAR DIVIDES DEMOCRATS, BUT TRUMP’S DIPLOMACY ALSO SPLITTING REPUBLICANS

“Cool, Ted,” Bruesewitz wrote on X, touching off a tit-for-tat exchange with Cruz. “No one asked you, bro.

“Stop trying to undermine the President and his administration.”

Cruz fired back, suggesting Trump’s inner circle might be pushing Obama-era “Iran appeasement.”

DAVID MARCUS: THE MAGA ‘CIVIL WAR’ OVER IRAN IS A MYTH

“Hush, child,” Cruz replied on X. “The adults are talking. I’m not your ‘bro.’ And young political grifters pushing Iran appeasement are not remotely helping the President.”

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, got into a tit-for-tat with a trusted President Donald Trump outside advisor for suggesting a pending Iran peace deal would amount to “Iran appeasement.”(Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

While there is some criticism of the Trump White House peace efforts, a noted Senate anti-war voice from the right came out to tell critics to let Trump cook.

“War virtually always ends with negotiations,” Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., wrote Sunday morning on X. “Critics of President Trump’s peace negotiations should give President Trump the space to find an American First solution.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Trump, in his Sunday morning Truth Social post, suggested Iran might ultimately wind up a reliable member of the Abraham Accords, his signature deal to secure long-lasting peace in the Middle East.

“I would like to thank, thus far, all of the countries of the Middle East for their support and cooperation, which will be further enhanced and strengthened by their joining the Nations of the historic Abraham Accords and, who knows, perhaps the Islamic Republic of Iran would like to join, as well!” Trump wrote.

Eric Mack is a writer for Fox News Digital covering breaking news.

Senator Booker on emerging Iran Deal: ‘Donald Trump is being played as a fool.’

2026-05-24 11:48 AM EDT / CNN

By Jake Tapper, CNN

Published 11:48 AM EDT, Sun May 24, 2026

https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/24/politics/video/booker-trump-iran-deal

Senator Booker on emerging Iran Deal: “Donald Trump is being played as a fool.”

Senator Booker talks with Jake Tapper about the emerging Iran Deal, generational change in the Democratic Party, and what Democrats need to do to meet the moment.

6:54 • Source: CNN

美国优先重建本国武器库 或推迟两年向日本交付战斧导弹

2026年5月24日 22:52 / 联合早报

美军3月9日发布的视频显示，美国海军的弗兰克·E·彼得森号导弹驱逐舰在一处不明地点发射战斧导弹，支援对伊朗的“史诗怒火”行动。 （路透社）

（伦敦讯）消息人士透露，由于五角大楼正优先重建因伊朗战争而大量消耗的武器库存，美国可能会推迟两年交付日本所订购的400枚战斧导弹。据悉，美国此前也已知会几个欧洲盟友，它们采购的美国武器预计会大幅延迟交货。

《金融时报》引述几名知情者报道，美国战争部长赫格塞斯本月早前与日本防长小泉进次郎通电话时告知对方，战斧（Tomahawk）导弹的交付预计会严重延误。

报道指出，这对日本来说是一个沉重打击。2024年，日本首次订购战斧导弹，以加强对中国的威慑力。这款导弹射程达1600公里，将使日本具备打击中国沿海地区的“反击”能力。

日本原本在2028年4月前，分两批收到这些导弹。据悉，美国告诉日本，交货时间可能会延迟最多两年。

日本是美国在印度太平洋地区的重要盟友，它延迟收到导弹，将对整个印太地区产生影响。此前，五角大楼把武器从亚洲转移到中东，已引起亚洲盟友担忧。

美国企业研究所亚洲安全专家库珀（Zack Cooper）说：“尽管特朗普政府高官一再承诺会以亚洲为优先，但五角大楼现在却把重心放在中东。考虑到军火生产的漫长周期，在伊朗战争结束后，亚洲盟友和伙伴将在很长的时间里继续感受到战争的影响。”

据美国战略与国际问题研究中心（CSIS）估算，美国在伊朗战争前约有3100枚战斧导弹，开战后用掉其中的1000多枚，而战斧导弹从美国国会批准拨款到列装美军耗时约四年。

《金融时报》4月已报道，美国也通知英国、波兰等欧洲盟友，它们向美国订购的武器系统交付时间将严重延误。

美国为伊朗战争消耗大量导弹，并把韩国萨德系统的拦截导弹等武器从亚洲转移到中东，加剧了外界对美军是否有足够武器，可在潜在的台海危机中协防台湾的担忧。

佳能全球战略研究所的亚洲防务专家峰村健司说，中国拥有2000多枚能打击日本境内目标的远程导弹，日本则几乎没有与之匹敌的导弹，因此获得战斧导弹至关重要。

峰村说：“美国推迟交付战斧……势必会进一步削弱美日对华联合威慑力量”。

专家预计，日本将被迫加快研发与制造国产导弹。

五角大楼拒绝就这一报道置评。日本驻美大使馆说，日美两国经常进行会谈，但拒绝透露具体谈话内容。

美国优先重建本国武器库 或推迟两年向日本交付战斧导弹

2026年5月24日 22:52 / 联合早报

美军3月9日发布的视频显示，美国海军的弗兰克·E·彼得森号导弹驱逐舰在一处不明地点发射战斧导弹，支援对伊朗的“史诗怒火”行动。 （路透社）

（伦敦讯）消息人士透露，由于五角大楼正优先重建因伊朗战争而大量消耗的武器库存，美国可能会推迟两年交付日本所订购的400枚战斧导弹。据悉，美国此前也已知会几个欧洲盟友，它们采购的美国武器预计会大幅延迟交货。

《金融时报》引述几名知情者报道，美国战争部长赫格塞斯本月早前与日本防长小泉进次郎通电话时告知对方，战斧（Tomahawk）导弹的交付预计会严重延误。

报道指出，这对日本来说是一个沉重打击。2024年，日本首次订购战斧导弹，以加强对中国的威慑力。这款导弹射程达1600公里，将使日本具备打击中国沿海地区的“反击”能力。

日本原本在2028年4月前，分两批收到这些导弹。据悉，美国告诉日本，交货时间可能会延迟最多两年。

日本是美国在印度太平洋地区的重要盟友，它延迟收到导弹，将对整个印太地区产生影响。此前，五角大楼把武器从亚洲转移到中东，已引起亚洲盟友担忧。

美国企业研究所亚洲安全专家库珀（Zack Cooper）说：“尽管特朗普政府高官一再承诺会以亚洲为优先，但五角大楼现在却把重心放在中东。考虑到军火生产的漫长周期，在伊朗战争结束后，亚洲盟友和伙伴将在很长的时间里继续感受到战争的影响。”

据美国战略与国际问题研究中心（CSIS）估算，美国在伊朗战争前约有3100枚战斧导弹，开战后用掉其中的1000多枚，而战斧导弹从美国国会批准拨款到列装美军耗时约四年。

《金融时报》4月已报道，美国也通知英国、波兰等欧洲盟友，它们向美国订购的武器系统交付时间将严重延误。

美国为伊朗战争消耗大量导弹，并把韩国萨德系统的拦截导弹等武器从亚洲转移到中东，加剧了外界对美军是否有足够武器，可在潜在的台海危机中协防台湾的担忧。

佳能全球战略研究所的亚洲防务专家峰村健司说，中国拥有2000多枚能打击日本境内目标的远程导弹，日本则几乎没有与之匹敌的导弹，因此获得战斧导弹至关重要。

峰村说：“美国推迟交付战斧……势必会进一步削弱美日对华联合威慑力量”。

专家预计，日本将被迫加快研发与制造国产导弹。

五角大楼拒绝就这一报道置评。日本驻美大使馆说，日美两国经常进行会谈，但拒绝透露具体谈话内容。

EPA Administrator on California toxic tank crisis: ‘We’re being told the tank will fail.’

2026-05-24 11:50 AM EDT / CNN Politics

By Jake Tapper, CNN

EPA Administrator on California toxic tank crisis: “We’re being told the tank will fail.”

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin talks with Jake Tapper about the toxic tank crisis in California, rollbacks to regulations of refrigerants and PFAS chemicals, and criticism from the MAHA movement.

7:25 • Source: CNN

Transcript: Reps. Josh Gottheimer and Mike Lawler on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” May 24, 2026

2026-05-24T11:51:11-0400 / CBS News

The following is the transcript of the interview with Reps. Josh Gottheimer, Democrat of Maine, and Mike Lawler, Republican of New York, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on May 24, 2026.

NANCY CORDES: We go now to a bipartisan pair of representatives. Josh Gottheimer is a Democrat from New Jersey, and Mike Lawler is a Republican from New York. Congressmen, welcome. Thank you for joining us.

REP. MIKE LAWLER: Thanks for having us.

REP. JOSH GOTTHEIMER: Thanks for having us.

NANCY CORDES: Sure. Congressman Lawler, I want to start with you and get your take on this memorandum of understanding that appears to be taking shape between the US and Iran. We’ve already seen some blow back from some of your fellow Republicans. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham said, if the reports on the deal are accurate, “it makes one wonder why the war started to begin with.” Congressman, do you share his view?

REP. LAWLER: No, and I think it’s important that we actually get all of the details, number one. Number two, if you look at what took place during the kinetic activity, what did they do? They focused on the ballistic missiles program, the drone capabilities, the naval fleet, and seizing control of Iran’s airspace. They were able to do that. Iran retaliated with a blockade in the Strait of Hormuz, and President Trump blockaded that, which caused great harm to Iran’s economy, stopped the flow of oil to China, and so there’s been immense pressure for everybody to reach a deal, but the bottom line is the objective is to ensure that Iran does not possess a nuclear weapon, and that is what President Trump has been clear and consistent on from the very beginning. And so, I think it is imperative, before everybody rushed to, you know, get to the microphone, that they actually understand the terms of the agreement that is being proposed, and specifically with respect to the enriched uranium.

NANCY CORDES: So, you like what you’re hearing?

REP. LAWLER: Look, I’ve been in touch with the administration. I serve as chair of the Middle East and North Africa Subcommittee on the Foreign Affairs Committee. I think on the whole, what the administration has been able to do for the first time in 47 years has forced the remnants of this regime into a negotiation, a real negotiation. The fact is, the JCPOA, from over a decade ago, was not a negotiation, it put Iran on the glide path to a nuclear bomb. We are trying to stop that, and the president took decisive action to do it.

NANCY CORDES: Congressman Gottheimer, you’ve been pushing to get a war powers resolution passed. You’re getting closer to doing it. If the nuclear decisions get pushed off, but the Strait of Hormuz does get reopened more quickly, is that a win for American taxpayers?

REP. GOTTHEIMER: Well, I think the good news here, and as Mike said, we’re still getting details. The good news is the Straits will be back open, if that’s true, and that will mean gas prices will go down for Americans, and that’s good news. The news is bad news, in my opinion, is, and this is where it’s unclear, is the initial objectives had to do with enriched uranium and making sure that from a nuclear capability. Iran, which I think is a clear adversary to the United States under banners of death to America, and I believe the Iranian regime should be crushed, but part of that is making sure that we diminish their nuclear capabilities. So, they can’t make the jump to having a nuclear weapon. That we significantly diminish their ballistic military capabilities, their missile capabilities, and of course their drone activity, and then with all the dollars that have gone historically to terror programs and their proxy programs, Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Those are all questions that are out there, and it’s unclear if we’ve made any substantial progress there, and I think you know, if the end to point of Senator Graham, if you look back at this and say, okay, we’ve made huge investments, and we’ve had a clear goal along, which is to crush Iran and reduce their ballistic and missile program, their nuclear program, their terror program, and all we got was actually something that was never on the table, a reopening of the Straits of Hormuz. That to me, in the end, will not be reaching the goals initially set forth here, and so that’s-that’s the big question. If we’ve just really gotten nothing and kind of run in place.

NANCY CORDES: Congressman Lawler, the President made a high-profile visit to your district on Friday. He campaigned for you because you represent one of just three Republican-held districts in the US that Kamala Harris won in 2024. How are you explaining to your constituents this new settlement that prevents the IRS from auditing any Trump family documents prior to this year?

REP. LAWLER: Well, I think when it comes to any agreements that the president has made with the IRS, from my vantage point, you know, I think looking back at what the Biden administration did, they certainly weaponized the government and were targeting the president, and I think he obviously had claims that he brought against the government as a result of that. From the standpoint of the president, you know, I was happy to welcome him to my district, just as I did Joe Biden when he was president. Joe Biden came three years ago to my district, and I showed up. President Trump was here. We had over 5,000 people show up in my district to hear directly from the President on the issues most acutely impacting them, including my ability to deliver on lifting the cap on SALT. The President also announced bestowing the Presidential Medal of Freedom on one of my constituents who died on 9/11, Wells Crowther, the man in the red bandana, who saved 18 lives. And we also heard from the Gorman family, their daughter Sheridan Gorman, was brutally murdered by an illegal immigrant who was allowed into this country under Joe Biden’s open border policies, and then arrested in Chicago, released under cashless bail and disastrous pro-criminal policies in the city of Chicago, and murdered this 18 year old girl who had her whole life ahead of her, and so hearing from her family was paramount. So, I was happy to have the president there.

NANCY CORDES: Understood. I do want to get to the issue of antisemitism, because we wanted to have you both on together, because you are working together on ways to address the rise in anti-Semitism in the US. Congressman Gottheimer, I understand the value in lawmakers drawing attention to some of the really vile incidents that we have seen in this country lately, the stabbing of a Jewish man on the streets of New York, the shooting at the Capitol Jewish Museum here in Washington, but what can Congress realistically do about this problem?

REP. GOTTHEIMER: Well, we know since October 7 in the Hamas terrorist attacks, anti-Semitic incidents in the country are up 70%. Mike and I- both our states have some of the top anti- numbers of antisemitic incidents in the entire country. It’s totally unacceptable. And what’s happening now is it’s far too often in our politics on both sides, right? Whether it’s Hasan Piker, who’s a streamer on the left, or Candace Owens on the right, who were campaigning with candidates around the country, actually encouraging some of the most vile anti-Semitic language, like Hassan Piker, who calls Jews pigdogs, Candace Owens, who denies the Holocaust. We’ve got candidates on both sides who’ve embraced them, who’ve made insane comments, like the woman in Texas this past week, a Democratic candidate who said that Jews should be in camps. You’ve got Bilzerian, Dan Bilzerian in Florida, who said we should exterminate Jews. None of this should be acceptable. And- and Mike and I, whether it’s through the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, which we passed out of the House last Congress on defining anti-Semitism, and introduced again this Congress, or both of us condemning Piker and Owens in legislation, both of us believe deeply that we need to stand up to this. And Mike’s been very outspoken, as have others, and our leadership on both sides needs to make it very clear time and again that- that you don’t stand with these- with people like Owens and Piker, and they’re not welcome in our districts, and none of this language is acceptable either. I think it’s very important.

NANCY CORDES: Congressman Lawler, why do you believe that fringe candidates, like the one that Congressman Gottheimer just mentioned, sense that there is a market for that sort of hate to begin with? Is there some kind of permission structure that has been created in both of your parties?

REP. LAWLER: I don’t think there’s any question that anti-Semitism has been condoned by folks across the political aisle, and from my vantage point, it is something that all of us have a responsibility to push back against, regardless of party. These candidates are coming forward. They feel it is okay to blame Jews for whatever ills there are in the world. Obviously- you know, I experienced just last week Rand Paul’s son screaming at me in a bar because he thought I was Jewish, when in fact I’m Irish, Italian, Catholic, and regardless of whether I was or I wasn’t Jewish, the idea–

NANCY CORDES: — He has apologized for that–

REP. LAWLER: — For him to feel it is okay to engage in that. He did ultimately, but the idea that people feel it’s okay to engage in that type of conduct is shameful. And I think what Josh and I are trying to do in putting this resolution forward is to say enough, and to say to both parties, we have to police our own. We cannot allow this. We cannot support candidates who engage in rank, vile anti-Semitism. You know, the Jewish population is about 2% of the United States, and meanwhile it’s over 50% of the hate crime. Times that are experienced, something’s got to give.

NANCY CORDES: Got it. Congressman Lawler, Congressman Gottheimer. We appreciate both of you coming on. Thank you so much. And we’ll be right back.

以总理内坦亚胡：与特朗普一致认为须消除伊朗核威胁

2026年5月24日 23:30 / 联合早报

以色列总理内坦亚胡说，需要拆除伊朗的核浓缩设施，并将浓缩核材料从伊朗领土上移除。 （路透社档案照片）

以色列总理内坦亚胡说，他与美国总统特朗普一致认为，任何与伊朗达成的最终协议都必须消除德黑兰构成的核威胁。

路透社报道，内坦亚胡星期天（5月24日）在社媒Telegram上发文说，这将需要拆除伊朗的核浓缩设施，并将浓缩核材料从伊朗领土上移除。

他也说，特朗普重申了以色列有权在所有战线上自卫，包括在黎巴嫩的威胁。

以总理内坦亚胡：与特朗普一致认为须消除伊朗核威胁

2026年5月24日 23:30 / 联合早报

以色列总理内坦亚胡说，需要拆除伊朗的核浓缩设施，并将浓缩核材料从伊朗领土上移除。 （路透社档案照片）

以色列总理内坦亚胡说，他与美国总统特朗普一致认为，任何与伊朗达成的最终协议都必须消除德黑兰构成的核威胁。

路透社报道，内坦亚胡星期天（5月24日）在社媒Telegram上发文说，这将需要拆除伊朗的核浓缩设施，并将浓缩核材料从伊朗领土上移除。

他也说，特朗普重申了以色列有权在所有战线上自卫，包括在黎巴嫩的威胁。