分类: 未分类

  • 阿利托警告最高法院犯下“严重错误”,或危及国家安全


    2026年7月1日 美国东部时间下午2:30 / 福克斯新闻

    阿利托警告称,外国国民所生的孩子可能在成长过程中仇视美国,却仍能持有美国护照并享有完整公民权利

    作者:伊莱恩·马伦 福克斯新闻

    香农·布里姆解读阿利托大法官关于出生权公民身份的异议意见
    香农·布里姆重点介绍了大法官塞缪尔·阿利托对最高法院出生权公民身份裁决的强烈异议。阿利托警告了国家安全风险,并列举了外国母亲或非法移民在美国所生子女可能构成威胁的假设情景。他辩称,该裁决为非法入境提供了“强大动机”,可能影响国家未来。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!
    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/1b5986e3-316a-48d9-8bf3-fe21b8e47a63

    收听本文
    3分钟

    最高法院大法官塞缪尔·阿利托警告称,最高法院在“特朗普诉芭芭拉”案中维持了对大多数在美国出生的人的出生权公民身份的裁决,将公民身份扩展到非法移民和临时访客(包括“生育游客”)所生的子女,这威胁到美国的国家安全。

    “这是最高法院历史上最重要的裁决之一,在我看来,最高法院犯下了严重错误,”阿利托在其异议意见中写道。

    周二,最高法院以6票对3票的投票结果推翻了唐纳德·特朗普总统在就职次日发布的行政令,该行政令限制父母未在美国拥有永久合法身份的人自动获得美国公民身份。

    阿利托在强烈的异议意见中猛烈抨击多数派的裁决,辩称大法官们误读了第十四修正案。他写道,只有完全效忠美国且不效忠其他国家的人,才应在出生时自动获得公民身份。

    这11项即将到来的最高法院裁决可能决定特朗普第二任期议程的成败

    2019年3月7日,在华盛顿特区众议院小组委员会听证会上,大法官塞缪尔·阿利托就最高法院预算作证(奇普·索莫德维拉/盖蒂图片社)

    除了宪法层面的反对意见外,阿利托还警告称,该裁决可能被寻求为子女获取美国公民身份的敌对国家外国国民所利用。

    “最高法院的解释不仅与第十四修正案的原始含义相悖,还会产生荒谬的结果,”阿利托写道。“尽管希望合法移民的外国人有时需要等待多年,但生育游客在美国所生的孩子会自动成为公民。”

    最高法院最新移民裁决将导致美国人“死亡和受苦”,一名律师警告

    阿利托描述了一个假设情景:一名外国国民在美国分娩后迅速返回本国,以此作为更大阴谋的一部分,最终意图伤害美国。

    “假设孩子在成长过程中从未访问过美国,且被灌输对这个国家的仇恨,”阿利托写道。“根据最高法院的裁决,此人是美国公民。他可以自由进出该国。他可以持美国护照周游世界。即使他密谋伤害这个国家,至少根据现行先例,他也无法被剥夺公民身份。”

    2025年12月13日,白宫边境事务专员汤姆·霍曼出席圣地亚哥与墨西哥蒂华纳之间边境墙沿线的新闻发布会(路透社/迈克·布莱克)

    “美国移民改革联盟”联合主席迈克尔·豪夫支持阿利托的观点,他认为扩大出生权公民身份会削弱美国公民身份的价值,并使美国面临外国对手的威胁。

    他向福克斯新闻数字频道指出了《华尔街日报》的一项调查,该调查显示,一名中国科技亿万富翁从未踏入美国境内,却通过代孕在美国生下了约100个孩子。

    “看看中国生育旅游和试管婴儿技术的情况,19世纪60年代起草第十四修正案的人显然没有想到富裕的外国国民会通过现代生殖技术在美国生育孩子,”豪夫说。“这类问题应该留给国会,而不是由法官曲解宪法语言来决定。”

    订阅获取政治新闻简报

    边境事务专员汤姆·霍曼向福克斯新闻呼应了阿利托对国家安全的担忧,呼吁对生育旅游展开更深入调查。

    2026年4月1日,示威者在华盛顿特区最高法院外集会支持出生权公民身份(曼德尔·恩/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    “我同意阿利托大法官的观点,”霍曼告诉福克斯新闻。“出生权公民身份一直是非法移民的主要驱动力之一。”

    “但更重要的是,这是一个国家安全问题,”霍曼说。“我们有成千上万来自中国和俄罗斯的国民前来美国生育,然后离开。现在我们有了成千上万的公民,如果这种情况继续下去,在我们认为是对手的国家里,这一数字将达到数百万。这些人可能会来到美国,对国家的运作方式产生影响。”

    伊莱恩·马伦是福克斯新闻数字频道和福克斯商业频道的撰稿人,报道全国政治新闻。

    Alito warns Supreme Court made ‘serious mistake’ that could have national security consequences

    July 1, 2026 2:30pm EDT / Fox News

    Alito warns a child born to a foreign national could grow up hating America yet still hold a US passport and full citizenship rights

    By Elaine Mallon Fox News

    Shannon Bream reads Justice Alito’s dissent on birthright citizenship implications

    Shannon Bream highlights Justice Samuel Alito’s strong dissent regarding the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision. Alito warns of national security implications, citing hypothetical scenarios of children born in the U.S. to foreign mothers or illegal immigrants, who might pose threats. He argues this ruling offers a ‘powerful incentive’ for illegal entry, potentially affecting the country’s future.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/1b5986e3-316a-48d9-8bf3-fe21b8e47a63

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito warned that the court’s ruling in Trump v. Barbara, which upheld birthright citizenship for most people born in the United States, threatens America’s national security by extending citizenship to children born to illegal aliens and temporary visitors, including “birth tourists.”

    “This is one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court, and in my judgment, the Court has made a serious mistake,” Alito wrote in his dissent.

    On Tuesday, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to strike down President Donald Trump’s executive order, issued on his second day in office, restricting automatic United States citizenship for people born in the United States whose parents did not have permanent legal status in the country.

    Alito railed against the majority’s ruling in a forceful dissent, arguing the justices misinterpreted the 14th Amendment. He wrote that only people who owe their full allegiance to the United States, and not another country, should automatically receive citizenship at birth.

    THESE 11 UPCOMING SUPREME COURT DECISIONS COULD MAKE OR BREAK TRUMP’S SECOND TERM AGENDA

    Justice Samuel Alito testifies about the court’s budget during a hearing a House subcommittee hearing on March 7, 2019, in Washington, D.C.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    But beyond his constitutional objections, Alito warned the ruling could be exploited by foreign nationals from enemy nations seeking U.S. citizenship for their children.

    “The Court’s interpretation is not only contrary to the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, it produces grotesque results,” Alito wrote. “While foreigners who wish to immigrate lawfully must sometimes wait for many years, a child born here to a birth tourist is automatically a citizen.”

    SUPREME COURT’S LATEST IMMIGRATION RULING WILL CAUSE AMERICANS TO ‘DIE AND SUFFER’ ATTORNEY WARNS

    Alito described a hypothetical scenario in which a foreign national gives birth in the United States before promptly returning to her home country as part of a larger plot to eventually harm the United States.

    “Suppose the child never visited the United States while growing up and was inculcated with hatred of this country,” Alito wrote. “According to the Court, that person is a citizen of the United States. He can enter and leave the country as he pleases. He can travel the world on a United States passport. Even if he plots to harm this country, he cannot be deprived of his status as a citizen, at least under current precedent.”

    White House border czar Tom Homan attends a press conference along the border wall between San Diego and Mexico’s Tijuana, Dec. 13, 2025.(Reuters/Mike Blake)

    Michael Hough, co-president of NumbersUSA, sided with Alito, arguing that expanding birthright citizenship risks diluting the value of U.S. citizenship and exposing the United States to foreign adversaries.

    He pointed Fox News Digital to a Wall Street Journal investigation reporting that a Chinese tech billionaire fathered roughly 100 children born in the United States through surrogacy, despite never having entered the country.

    “Look at what’s happening with Chinese birth tourism and IVF. The people who drafted the 14th Amendment in the 1860s obviously weren’t contemplating wealthy foreign nationals creating children in the United States through modern reproductive technology,” Hough said. “Those kinds of questions should be left to Congress, not decided by judges stretching constitutional language.”

    SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

    Border czar Tom Homan echoed Alito’s concerns over national security to Fox News, calling for greater investigations into birth tourism.

    Demonstrators rally in support of birthright citizenship outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on April 1, 2026.(Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “I agree with Judge Alito,” Homan told Fox News. “Birthright citizenship has always been a major driver for illegal immigration.”

    “But more importantly, it’s a national security concern,” Homan said. “We have nationals from China and Russia coming in the thousands, having a baby and leaving. Now we have citizens in the thousands, and if this continued, in the millions in countries that I think are adversaries to us. That could come here and have an impact on how this country is run.”

    Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.

  • 前民主党人披露脱党原因:将以共和党身份在民主党铁票仓参选


    阿富汗退伍军人兼律师在马萨诸塞州第六国会选区共和党初选中无对手参选

    2026年7月1日 美国东部夏令时下午1:32 / 福克斯新闻
    作者:利奥·布里塞尼奥

    马萨诸塞州共和党候选人认为眼下正是拿下这一长期由民主党把持席位的绝佳时机

    米卡·琼斯,这位从民主党转投共和党的候选人,希望抓住几十年来首次出现的席位空缺机遇。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/b8c7505c-dddc-4c90-98ee-2ded65de22dd

    收听本文
    4分钟

    米卡·琼斯,这位自称曾是肯尼迪式民主党人的候选人转投共和党后,希望抓住“千载难逢”的机遇,力争拿下马萨诸塞州第六国会选区。

    “这个席位上次出现空缺还是在47年前,”琼斯说道。

    “我认为,当我们的国会代表团只有一个党派时,马萨诸塞州会蒙受损失——在我看来,该党议员比其他州的议员更不愿与跨党派合作。”

    琼斯的竞选团队押注该选区的独立选民——或许还有部分民主党人——会意识到,哪怕只有一名共和党籍众议员,也能为马萨诸塞州带来好处。再加上马萨诸塞州偶尔会出现共和党胜选的先例,琼斯相信自己的竞选能够打破过往不利局面,助力决定众议院的权力平衡。

    十余位民主党人激烈角逐接替米基·谢里尔的席位,唯一共和党候选人找到了自身优势

    国会大厦旁的马萨诸塞州国会候选人米卡·琼斯(米卡·琼斯竞选团队;丹尼尔·奥伊尔/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    参选国会前,琼斯曾在第82空降师服役,于2014年至2015年赴阿富汗执行任务。后来他考入法学院,成为一名律师。

    正是在法学院就读期间,他开始对民主党发展方向产生疑虑,称其发展轨迹让他“大为震惊”。

    “那是在2016年,算是个前奏,之后几年我们遭遇了更多与进步主义意识形态相关的问题,”琼斯回忆道。
    “尤其是在支持执法方面——当时正值‘defund the police’(解散警局)运动。还有那种试图将人们划分为压迫者和被压迫者的世界观,我觉得这与肯尼迪总统的愿景截然不同。从那时起,我退出民主党,成为了无党派人士。”

    尽管琼斯认为该州63%的注册无党派选民中,有一部分人或许认同这一观点,但他向他们推销的理念更为务实。

    他认为,马萨诸塞州正因缺乏共和党籍议员而蒙受损失——后者可以与共和党政府和国会展开协作。

    摇摆选区纽约共和党人在这场决定众议院控制权的关键选战中势头渐长

    2026年5月11日,唐纳德·特朗普总统在白宫玫瑰园举行的全国警察周活动中,向其政府成员和执法机构领导人晚宴发表讲话(朱莉娅·德马雷·尼基森/美联社照片)

    “我们的两名参议员、九名国会议员——没有一位是共和党人。我认为他们采取了‘只为反对’的心态,”琼斯在谈及民主党同僚对特朗普政府的态度时说道。
    “正因如此,我们错失了大量联邦资金,数十亿美元的联邦资金。如果我成为该代表团里唯一的共和党人,就能在合理的时候与政府合作,在不合理的时候提出反对,秉公评判,真正专注于不仅符合我所选民区的利益,还能为整个马萨诸塞州发声。”

    当被问及为何不直接以无党派身份参选,而是选择共和党标签时,琼斯表示,他需要该党的竞选基础设施,才能真正开展竞选活动拿下该选区。

    “你确实需要一个政党的运作体系。而且我确实是共和党人。可以说我属于中右翼,尤其是在财政问题上,”琼斯说道。
    “我名字旁的‘R’(共和党缩写)会是个挑战,我完全承认这一点。不过我认为还有15%到20%的选民确实是无党派人士,且非常看重候选人的素质。”

    作为例证,琼斯提到了其他在马萨诸塞州成功参选的共和党人。
    “人们都忘了,米特·罗姆尼曾担任马萨诸塞州州长。还有比尔·韦尔德州长,以及查理·贝克州长。所以我认为,马萨诸塞州的共和党模式是值得效仿的,在这里运作得非常好,”琼斯说道。

    关键摇摆选区民主党候选人就过往亲警、拥枪言论致歉

    马萨诸塞州国会候选人米卡·琼斯与选民交谈(米卡·琼斯竞选团队)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    该选区现任议员、民主党人赛斯·莫尔顿宣布将竞选参议员,不再寻求连任。他上一次连任是以62.9%比35.2%的得票率击败共和党挑战者、机械工程师小罗伯特·梅。

    琼斯在该州9月1日的初选中无对手参选,大概率将晋级11月3日的大选。

    利奥·布里塞尼奥是福克斯新闻数字频道国会组政治记者,此前曾任职于《世界杂志》。

    Ex-Democrat reveals why he ditched party and is running as Republican in blue stronghold

    Afghanistan veteran and attorney is running unopposed in GOP primary for the 6th Congressional District

    July 1, 2026 1:32pm EDT / Fox News

    By Leo Briceno

    Republican candidate in Massachusetts sees perfect storm to flip long held Democratic seat

    Micah Jones, a former Democrat-turned Republican, hopes to capitalize on a seat that’s open for the first time in decades.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/b8c7505c-dddc-4c90-98ee-2ded65de22dd

    Listen to this article

    4 min

    Micah Jones, a former self-described JFK Democrat-turned-Republican, hopes to capitalize on a “once-in-a-lifetime” opportunity as he looks to flip Massachusetts’ 6th Congressional District.

    “The last time this seat was open was 47 years ago,” Jones said.

    “I think that Massachusetts suffers when we have a one-party congressional delegation that, in my opinion, is less inclined to work across the aisle than representatives of other states.”

    Jones’s campaign is a bet that the district’s independent voters — and maybe some Democrats — will see the benefit Massachusetts could reap from having even just one Republican representative. Coupled with the precedent of the occasional Republican success is the Bay State, Jones believes his race can beat past odds and help decide the balance of power in the House of Representatives.

    LONE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FINDS HIS EDGE AS A DOZEN DEMOCRATS CLASH IN RACE TO REPLACE MIKIE SHERRILL

    Micah Jones, candidate for Congress in Massachusetts, pictured alongside U.S. Capitol.(Micah Jones for Congress; Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    Before running for Congress, Jones served in the military in the 82nd Airborne Division, deploying on a tour in Afghanistan from 2014 to 2015. Later, after going to law school, he became an attorney.

    It was in law school that he began to have doubts about the Democratic Party’s direction, describing a “shock” at its trajectory.

    “This was back in 2016. That was kind of the incubator before everything that we’ve now dealt with the last few years in regards to more progressive ideologies,” Jones recalled.

    “In particular, when it came to support for law enforcement — this was during the defund the police movement. When it came to a worldview that tried to classify people between oppressors and oppressed, I felt that was fundamentally different than President Kennedy’s vision. And at that point, I left the Democratic Party, became an independent.”

    Although Jones believes a portion of the state’s 63% registered independents may share that view, his pitch to them is more pragmatic.

    He believes Massachusetts is missing out on Republican representation that can coordinate with the GOP administration and Congress.

    NEW YORK REPUBLICAN IN TOSS-UP DISTRICT GAINS MOMENTUM IN KEY RACE TO DETERMINE HOUSE CONTROL

    President Donald Trump arrives to speak at a dinner for members of his administration and law enforcement organization leaders during National Police Week in the White House Rose Garden in Washington on May 11, 2026.(Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo)

    “Our two senators, our nine congressional members — none of them are Republicans. And I think that they have taken a resistance-only mindset,” Jones said, referring to their posture toward the Trump administration.

    “And so, I think that we lose out on significant federal funding, billions of dollars in federal funding. I could be the sole Republican on that delegation, to work with the administration when it makes sense, push back when it doesn’t, call balls and strikes, really focus on what’s best for not only my district, [and] advocate for Massachusetts as a whole.”

    When asked about the Republican label and why not just run as an independent, Jones said he believes he needs the party’s campaign infrastructure to meaningfully wage a campaign to flip the district.

    “You do need a party apparatus. And I am a Republican. I would say I’m center-right, especially on fiscal issues,” Jones said.

    “The ‘R’ next to my name is going to be challenging. I fully acknowledge that. I do, however, think there is another 15% to 20% [of voters] that really are independents and really do care about candidate quality.”

    As evidence, Jones pointed to other Republicans who have run successfully in Massachusetts.

    “People forget, Gov. Mitt Romney was governor of Massachusetts. You have Gov. Bill Weld; you have Gov. Charlie Baker. And so, I think that the Massachusetts Republican model is one to emulate and one that works very well here,” Jones said.

    DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE APOLOGIZES FOR PAST PRO-POLICE, PRO-GUN POSTS IN KEY BATTLEGROUND RACE

    Micah Jones, candidate for Congress in Massachusetts, speaks to a voter.(Micah Jones for Congress)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The district’s current occupant, Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., announced he would pursue a Senate seat rather than re-election. He last won re-election in a 62.9% to 35.2% victory over Republican challenger Robert May Jr., a mechanical engineer.

    Jones, who is running unopposed in the state’s Sept. 1 primaries, will likely advance to the general election on Nov. 3.

    Leo Briceno is a politics reporter for the congressional team at Fox News Digital. He was previously a reporter with World Magazine.

  • 特朗普2025年通过加密货币获利12亿美元 乔纳森·斯旺称这可能“仅为冰山一角”


    2026-07-01T17:47:28.642Z / CNN 政治频道

    作者:达娜·巴什,CNN
    发布时间:2026年7月1日,美国东部时间下午1:47

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/01/politics/video/haberman-swan-book-regime-change-trump-crypto-ip

    特朗普2025年通过加密货币获利12亿美元 乔纳森·斯旺称这可能“仅为冰山一角”

    《政坛内幕》

    特朗普总统的财务披露文件显示,他去年通过一系列加密货币投资、特许权使用费支付和房地产投资斩获数十亿美元。但记者乔纳森·斯旺在接受达娜·巴什采访时表示:“我们只了解其中一小部分情况……这份财务披露并未涵盖大量流入特朗普家族的资金。”斯旺与合著者玛吉·哈伯曼一同做客《政坛内幕》,讨论他们的新书《政权更迭》。

    9:47 • 消息来源:CNN

    Trump made $1.2B through crypto in 2025. Jonathan Swan says that likely doesn’t ‘scratch the surface’ of the family’s gains

    2026-07-01T17:47:28.642Z / CNN Politics

    By Dana Bash, CNN

    Published 1:47 PM EDT, Wed July 1, 2026

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/01/politics/video/haberman-swan-book-regime-change-trump-crypto-ip

    Trump made $1.2B through crypto in 2025. Jonathan Swan says that likely doesn’t ‘scratch the surface’ of the family’s gains

    Inside Politics

    President Trump’s financial disclosure documents reveal he collected billions of dollars via an array of cryptocurrency ventures, royalty payments and property investments last year. But reporter Jonathan Swan tells Dana Bash, ‘We only know a fraction of what’s going on… This financial disclosure does not account for a lot of the money that’s going into the Trump family.” Swan joins “Inside Politics” with his co-author Maggie Haberman to discuss their new book, “Regime Change.”

    9:47 • Source: CNN

  • 美军直升机在阿拉伯海坠毁,一名乘员失踪,美国海军证实


    2026年7月1日 / 美国东部时间下午2:01 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
    作者:马克·奥斯本

    据美国中央海军司令部消息,当地时间周三凌晨,一架载有四人的MH-60S“海鹰”直升机在阿拉伯海进行“紧急水上迫降”后,机上三名乘员已在海上获救。

    目前搜救行动仍在进行,以寻找第四名也是最后一名失踪乘员。

    美军方表示,目前“没有迹象”表明这架直升机因敌方火力被击落。该直升机隶属于“乔治·H·W·布什”号航母。

    美国中央海军司令部称:“直升机四名机组人员中的三人已被救起,目前在‘乔治·H·W·布什’号航母上情况稳定。美国海军在该区域的兵力目前正在搜寻其余仍失踪的机组人员。”

    事故发生在美东时间凌晨约3点30分,对应当地时间约上午11点。


    ![MH-60R“海鹰”直升机资料图。美国海军/法新社通过盖蒂图片社供图]

    “乔治·H·W·布什”号航母自4月底以来一直在中东地区部署,是目前部署在该区域的两艘航母之一。尽管美国已取消对进出霍尔木兹海峡船只的封锁,但仍在当地保持了相当规模的军事存在。

    截至5月中旬美国国会收到最新通报时,美军在“史诗愤怒”行动中已损失42架固定翼飞机或旋翼机。

    这一数据不包括今年6月初被伊朗无人机击落的美军阿帕奇直升机。当时该机两名机组人员成功获救。这起事件促使美国对伊朗发动“自卫打击”。

    埃莉诺·沃森对本文亦有贡献。

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/us-helicopter-goes-down-in-arabian-sea-crew-member-missing/

    U.S. helicopter goes down in Arabian Sea, crew member missing, Navy says

    July 1, 2026 / 2:01 PM EDT / CBS News

    By Mark Osborne

    Three members of a four-person MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter crew were rescued at sea after an “emergency water landing” in the Arabian Sea early Wednesday morning, according to U.S. Naval Forces Central Command.

    A search continues for the fourth and final crew member.

    There is “no indication” the helicopter was shot down by hostile action, the military said. The helicopter is assigned to the USS George H.W. Bush.

    “Three of the helicopter’s four crew members have been recovered and are in stable condition aboard George H. W. Bush,” U.S. Naval Forces Central Command said. “U.S. Navy assets in the region are currently searching for the other aircrewman still missing.”

    The incident happened at about 3:30 a.m. Eastern time, which would’ve been about 11 a.m. local time.

    File photo of an MH-60R Sea Hawk helicopter. U.S. Navy/AFP via Getty Images

    The USS George H.W. Bush has been in the Middle East since late April. It is one of two aircraft carriers remaining in the region. While the U.S. has rescinded its blockade of vessels traveling into and out of the Strait of Hormuz, it still has a sizable military presence.

    The U.S. had lost 42 fixed-wing or rotor aircraft in Operation Epic Fury as of mid-May, the last time an update was given to Congress.

    That does not include the U.S. Apache helicopter shot down by an Iranian drone in early June. The two crew members on that helicopter were able to be rescued. That incident precipitated the U.S. to undertake “self-defense strikes” against Iran.

    Eleanor Watson contributed to this report.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/us-helicopter-goes-down-in-arabian-sea-crew-member-missing/

  • 新闻


    南方贫困法律中心高管涉嫌利用大型银行开展“付钱买仇恨”计划

    美国官员:前首席财务官蒂尼·哈奇森、前研究主管海蒂·贝里奇和前首席执行官玛格丽特·黄涉嫌隐瞒该计划

    2026-07-01 13:32 EDT / 福克斯新闻

    作者:阿斯拉·Q·诺曼尼 福克斯新闻

    发布于2026年7月1日 13:32 EDT

    曾被南方贫困法律中心贴上“反穆斯林极端主义者”标签的穆斯林改革者称该非营利组织“应当解散

    曾被南方贫困法律中心(SPLC)贴上“反穆斯林极端主义者”标签的英国穆斯林改革者马吉德·纳瓦兹表示,SPLC应当“解散”。此前,美国司法部一项新调查显示,该组织多年来涉嫌秘密向极右翼极端分子支付了410万美元。

    【新增功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/88fd7d41-2735-4956-9b2e-ba0683a24c47

    收听本文
    13分钟

    FOX独家首发:联邦官员告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,南方贫困法律中心的两名前高管利用一系列支票账户,秘密向极端分子输送410万美元资金,其中包括一名绰号“雅利安野蛮人”的人,这是一个长期的“付钱买仇恨”计划。

    消息人士称,SPLC前首席财务官蒂尼·哈奇森和前情报项目主管海蒂·贝里奇于2008年在赛诺弗斯银行开设了这些账户,让这家饱受诟病的非营利组织信任的银行成为了将支持者捐款转移到可疑组织的枢纽。该网络最终为多达50名被称为“Fs”的秘密“现场线人提供支持,这些线人潜伏在全国各地的极端组织中。法庭文件中目前已确认约13名现场线人。

    “SPLC找到了自己的利基市场,其领导层用疯狂募集的捐款建立了一个独立王国,”前纽约警察局情报官员、律师兼福克斯新闻撰稿人保罗·毛罗说道。

    前SPLC首席执行官玛格丽特·黄涉嫌于2021年9月签署了一封向赛诺弗斯银行官员承认该计划的信件,随后于2025年7月结束了在SPLC的任期。

    SPLC的支持者将这些付款接收者称为“线人”,其中包括2017年弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔“团结右翼”抗议活动背后的右翼极端分子。

    “政府可以运作线人,”毛罗说,“私营企业不能。”

    最新披露的信息显示,对SPLC的联邦调查规模远大于最初报道的规模,且是在该组织最高层策划的。此前人们此前曾被认为贝里奇涉嫌参与所谓的付款,但这是联邦官员首次确认她涉案。

    有关SPLC案件的新细节浮出水面之际,特朗普政府的司法部正加强对有影响力的非营利组织加强审查。本周早些时候,福克斯新闻数字频道独家报道称,联邦检察官已对总部位于上海的马克思主义科技大亨内维尔·罗伊·辛格汉姆发起大陪审团调查,调查其资助左翼激进组织的资金是否存在非法行为。这两项联邦调查表明,本届政府正积极努力,审查某些组织是否利用非营利地位来隐瞒财务运作。

    (左侧为前SPLC主席兼首席执行官玛格丽特·黄,右侧为代理主席兼首席执行官布莱恩·费尔,这张拼接照片展示了该组织在领导层更迭和联邦调查中的处境。(来源:Variety/Penske Media via Getty Images;USA TODAY Network via Imagn Images)

    赛诺弗斯银行的一位发言人告诉福克斯新闻数字频道表示,这家总部位于佐治亚州哥伦布市的银行正在配合联邦调查人员参与“正在进行的调查”。

    “根据政策上,我们不会就特定客户关系不予置评,”该发言人表示,“我们已全力配合正在进行的调查,并将继续配合。”

    哈奇森、贝里奇和黄均未回应多次置评请求。5月下旬,SPLC提出驳回此案。6月9日,就在美国政府针对SPLC提出补充起诉书几天后,该非营利组织的代理总裁兼首席执行官布莱恩·费尔在众议院司法委员会举行的激烈听证会上否认SPLC并未有任何不当行为。

    这些指控是联邦案件的核心,该案件指控SPLC犯有银行欺诈、电信欺诈和共谋洗钱。熟悉调查的消息人士表示,可能会对该非营利组织的个别高管和前高管提出额外指控。

    福克斯新闻数字频道的调查通过洗钱传统的三个阶段剖析了政府对所谓行动的理论:放置、分层和整合。在第一阶段的放置环节,美国官员表示,哈奇森和贝里奇在SPLC内部创建并控制了一个隐藏的金融基础设施,这是据称向所谓的现场线人的410万美元非法付款的入口。

    在第二阶段,分层环节涉及将资金通过多个账户、交易和实体转移,例如哈奇森和贝里奇据称为虚假公司设立的一系列银行账户,目的是掩盖资金来源。最后,在第三阶段,整合环节发生在当行动的收益或产物被吸收到合法活动中,例如该组织的“极端分子档案”,并变得难以与普通商业活动区分开来。

    根据联邦检察官的说法,SPLC所谓的行动涵盖了所有三个阶段。

    司法部对马克思主义大亨内维尔·罗伊·辛格汉姆资助左翼组织的大陪审团调查

    SPLC情报项目主管海蒂·贝里奇出席活动时的照片,2018年1月12日。(来源:David Buchan/Variety/Penske Media via Getty Images)

    在未指明财务和情报主管的情况下,4月公开的大陪审团起诉书显示,“雇员1”和“雇员2”于2008年在“银行1”和“银行2”开设了一个秘密的九个银行账户网络,从2014年到2023年向极右翼极端分子输送数百万美元。最初的起诉书称金额为300万美元,但在补充起诉书中增至410万美元。

    起诉书指出,“SPLC的人员”是“秘密将捐款转移给‘Fs’的人,其中包括“雇员1”——“一名后来担任首席财务官的人”和“雇员2”——“一名后来担任情报项目主任的人”。

    联邦官员告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,从财务主管兼公司秘书升任首席财务官的哈奇森是“雇员1”。他们表示,“雇员2”是贝里奇,她于1999年以刚获得博士学位的学生身份加入SPLC,并于2004年被任命为情报项目副主任,后来担任情报报告主任。

    赛诺弗斯银行公司总部位于佐治亚州哥伦布市。(来源:赛诺弗斯银行)

    这两人据称以不标识SPLC的名称创建了银行账户结构。这九个空壳实体被命名为“中心调查机构”、“福克斯摄影”、“Imagery Ink”、“J&J电子”、“凯利海事”、“西北技术”、“技术作家小组”、“特纳人事”和“稀有书籍仓库”。

    联邦检察官指控这些账户被用于支付线人,同时隐瞒资金来源。政府的理论是,这些账户成为了支持大规模洗钱行动的金融基础设施。

    联邦检察官指控这些账户活跃多年,历经了这个美国最具影响力的民权组织之一的领导层更迭和内部动荡。

    SPLC高层官员据称向新纳粹线人支付120万美元,该线人同时是其秘密浪漫伴侣视频

    二十多年来,贝里奇成为了该非营利组织最具影响力的人物之一,塑造了“极右翼极端主义”、“白人至上”和“新纳粹仇恨”的记录、定义和传播方式。

    她曾在国会作证,并定期出现在电视和广播节目中。记者、学者和政策制定者经常向她寻求对白人民族主义团体、反政府运动和国内极端主义的分析。到2017年,美国广播公司将她描述为“追踪美国仇恨的女性。

    相比之下,哈奇森保持低调,很少被拍照,在幕后默默工作。2017年,她在该非营利组织“密西西比慈善注册”的续期文件中以SPLC财务主管兼秘书、财务记录的保管人,也是该非营利组织的两名“支票签署人”之一。

    SPLC将其官方银行列为斯特林银行列为赛诺弗斯银行的子公司,总部位于蒙哥马利。

    2019年10月,贝里奇与人共同创立了一个新的501(c)(3)非营利组织“全球反对仇恨与极端主义项目”,其邮寄地址距离阿拉巴马州首府SPLC总部仅三英里。

    两个月后,根据她的领英资料显示,贝里奇在SPLC工作了20年后离开了SPLC,就在针对她经营多年的“付钱买仇恨计划的天网正逐渐收紧。根据SPLC当年的纳税申报单显示,她最后一次的薪资为173,090美元,奖金为25,721美元。

    在贝里奇和哈奇森离开SPLC后,所谓的违规行为仍在继续。

    FOX独家首发:激烈的国会山听证会后,SPLC的免税地位面临威胁视频

    SPLC秘密付款的所谓接收者之一是埃里克·格利贝,新纳粹组织“国家联盟”前主席。在拳击时期被称为“雅利安野蛮人”的格利贝据称在2016年至2023年间从SPLC获得了超过14万美元。

    在他据称收取付款的同时,格利贝出现在SPLC描述极端分子和组织的材料中。一份专门介绍格利贝的SPLC“极端分子档案”页面包含了一个访客可以向该组织捐款的链接。

    SPLC将“雅利安野蛮人”埃里克·格利贝列为极端分子,并从该页面收集捐款,尽管据称多年来一直向他支付作为线人。(来源:南方贫困法律中心)

    格利贝未回应置评请求。

    曾代表“国家联盟”成员在涉及格利贝的诉讼中的弗吉尼亚州律师丹尼尔·哈维尔称格利贝描述格利贝为无能的领导者。

    “格利贝就是个笑话,”哈维尔告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,“他不知道如何经营企业或政治组织。他们这群人蠢得离谱。”

    哈维尔表示,那场诉讼的怨恨可能促成了格利贝成为SPLC线人。

    SPLC现任主席兼首席执行官玛格丽特·黄(左)和一位“为了自由妈妈”成员(右)。(来源:Getty Images)

    法庭文件显示,与所谓行动相关的大额账户一直活跃到2020年8月,当时隐藏的账户结构终于引起了银行官员的关注。根据法庭文件,赛诺弗斯银行进行了内部调查。此次审查成为政府案件中的关键时刻。

    根据起诉书显示,2021年9月9日左右,SPLC“总裁兼首席执行官”和SPLC“董事会主席”以书面形式向银行1——赛诺弗斯银行承认,虚构账户是“为南方贫困法律中心的运营利益而开设,并在该中心的授权下运作。

    他们在一份文件中还表示,“根据我们本周早些时候的讨论……这些账户是为了该组织的利益而开设和运作的。联邦消息人士告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,当时的首席执行官是黄。

    黄的承认现在处于政府法律理论的核心,即账户结构并非 rogue员工所为,而是在组织授权下运作的。

    该非营利组织及其姊妹组织SPLC行动基金于前一年雇佣了黄,称她为“国际知名的人权和公民权领袖”,此前曾担任美国大赦国际执行董事。

    目前尚不清楚签署文件时的董事会主席是谁,但前高盛高管贝内特·格劳当时是董事会成员。格劳未回应多次置评请求。

    黄签署承认书的角色此前从未公开披露过。

    SPLC起诉书为贝森特的财政部调查党派非营利组织带来动力

    斯科特·贝森特出席“会见媒体”节目,2026年3月22日。(来源:NBC/MeetThePress)

    SPLC最后一次在截至2022年10月31日的IRS 990申报单中列出哈奇森。根据该IRS申报单,她最后一次的薪资为237,749美元,奖金为32,697美元。

    2025年7月初,黄宣布辞去总裁一职,“以优先家庭生活”。董事会任命宪法学者、前SPLC董事会主席布莱恩·费尔为代理总裁兼首席执行官。

    联邦官员告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,SPLC高级官员在这一所谓行动中的角色引发了执法部门的重大警示,称所谓的活动反映了一个从顶层指导的结构化生态系统。调查人员将此次行动描述为SPLC及其姊妹组织的资金流动、线人、公共内容和政治工作紧密相连,哈奇森和贝里奇等高级官员负责控制SPLC的资金、叙事和影响力。

    **被起诉的SPLC主席因涉嫌向KKK成员秘密付款而面临众议院质询视频

    2017年10月,穆斯林改革者马吉德·纳瓦兹在福克斯新闻上谈论南方贫困法律中心将他污蔑为“反穆斯林极端主义者”。(来源:福克斯新闻)

    法庭程序对SPLC的一些目标来说是一种平反。

    早在2017年10月,SPLC和其他三个组织——媒体事务、重新思考媒体和新社区中心发布了一份题为“反穆斯林极端主义者实地指南”。当时的采访中,贝里奇证实,民主党亿万富翁乔治·索罗斯的开放社会慈善机构为该报告的制作提供了资金。

    该报告将马吉德·纳瓦兹——英国穆斯林改革者,他创立了奎拉姆基金会以打击伊斯兰极端主义。2018年,他起诉SPLC诽谤,赢得了337.5万美元的和解金和公开道歉。

    纳瓦兹最近告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,SPLC所谓的支付极端分子的体系是腐败的,他对针对该非营利组织的联邦起诉感到欣慰。

    “他们在资助双方,”纳瓦兹说,“如果你控制了游戏规则……你就能控制仇恨的来源……然后控制反应。”

    “他们拿钱来打击仇恨,”他说,“然后[资助他们拿钱来打击的仇恨。”

    在SPLC进行辩护之际,纳瓦兹表示,“这份起诉书清楚地表明,SPLC现在应该解散。它应该就此终结。”

    福克斯新闻数字频道的邦妮·朱和阿德里安娜·詹姆斯-罗迪尔为本报告做出了贡献。

    阿斯拉·诺曼尼是福克斯新闻数字频道的调查高级编辑。她曾是《华尔街日报》记者,报道过与金钱、政治和社会相关的报道。她是《觉醒之军:破坏美国自由的左翼-绿色联盟》一书的作者。可通过asra.nomani@fox.com联系她,或在X平台上关注@asranomani。

    Southern Poverty Law Center’s leaders allegedly used major bank to fund pay-to-hate operation

    US officials: Ex-CFO Teenie Hutchison, ex-research chief Heidi Beirich and ex-CEO Margaret Huang allegedly kept scheme secret

    2026-07-01 13:32 EDT / Fox News

    By Asra Q. Nomani Fox News

    Published July 1, 2026 1:32pm EDT

    Muslim reformer branded an ‘extremist’ by SPLC says the nonprofit should ‘cease to exist’

    Once branded an “anti-Muslim extremist” by the SPLC, British Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz says the SPLC should “cease to exist” as a new DOJ investigation reveals it allegedly secretly paid far-right extremists $4.1 million over many years.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/88fd7d41-2735-4956-9b2e-ba0683a24c47

    Listen to this article

    13 min

    FIRST ON FOX: A pair of former top executives at the Southern Poverty Law Center used a network of checking accounts to secretly funnel $4.1 million to extremists, including one nicknamed “The Aryan Barbarian,” in a long-running pay-to-hate scheme, federal officials told Fox News Digital.

    The SPLC’s former chief financial officer Teenie Hutchison and ex-Intelligence Project chief Heidi Beirich allegedly created the accounts at Synovus Bank in 2008, making the beleaguered nonprofit’s trusted bank a hub for diverting supporters’ donations to sketchy groups, sources said. The network ultimately supported secret payments to as many as 50 confidential “field sources,” called “Fs,” embedded within extremist organizations around the country. Some 13 field sources have so far been identified in court filings.

    “The SPLC found its niche, and its leaders built a fiefdom with donations they got like crazy,” former NYPD intelligence official, attorney and Fox News contributor Paul Mauro said.

    Former SPLC Chief Executive Officer Margaret Huang allegedly signed a letter acknowledging the operation to Synovus bank officials in September 2021 before ending her tenure at the SPLC in July 2025.

    SPLC supporters have characterized the payment recipients as “informants,” and they included a right-wing extremist behind the infamous 2017 “Unite the Right” protests in Charlottesville, Va.

    “The government can run informants,” said Mauro. “Private industry cannot.”

    The new revelations show the federal investigation of the SPLC is significantly larger than initially reported and was orchestrated at the organization’s highest level. Beirich was previously believed to be involved in the alleged payments, but this is the first time federal officials have confirmed her involvement.

    The new details about the SPLC case emerge as the Trump administration’s Justice Department intensifies scrutiny of influential nonprofit organizations. Earlier this week, Fox News Digital reported exclusively that federal prosecutors launched a grand jury investigation into Shanghai-based Marxist tech mogul Neville Roy Singham over possible illegality in his funding of left-wing activist groups. Together, the two federal investigations signal an aggressive effort by the administration to examine whether certain organizations are using their nonprofit status to conceal financial operations.

    Former SPLC President and CEO Margaret Huang, left, and interim President and CEO Bryan Fair are shown in a split image as the organization navigates leadership changes and a federal investigation.(Variety/Penske Media via Getty Images; USA TODAY Network via Imagn Images)

    A spokesperson for Synovus Bank told Fox News Digital that the lender, based in Columbus, Ga., is working with federal investigators in the “ongoing investigation.”

    “As a matter of policy, we do not comment on specific client relationships,” the spokesperson said. “We have cooperated fully with the ongoing investigation and will continue to do so.”

    Hutchison, Beirich and Huang didn’t respond to repeated requests for comment. In late May, the SPLC filed a motion to dismiss the case. On June 9, days after the U.S. government filed a superseding indictment against the SPLC, the nonprofit’s interim president and chief executive officer, Bryan Fair, denied any wrongdoing by the SPLC during a fiery hearing before the House Judiciary Committee.

    The allegations sit at the center of a federal case accusing the SPLC of bank fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Sources familiar with the investigation say additional charges will likely be filed against individual executives and former executives of the nonprofit.

    Fox News Digital’s investigation unpacks the government’s theory of the alleged operation through the traditional three stages of money laundering: placement, layering and integration. In the first stage of placement, U.S. officials say Hutchison and Beirich created and controlled a hidden financial infrastructure at SPLC that became the entry point for $4.1 million in allegedly illicit payments made to so-called field sources.

    In the second stage, layering involves moving money through multiple accounts, transactions and entities, like a series of bank accounts Hutchison and Beirich allegedly set up for fake companies, designed to obscure the money’s origin. Finally, in the third stage, integration occurs when the proceeds or products of an operation become absorbed into legitimate activities, like the organization’s “Extremist Files,” and become difficult to distinguish from ordinary business operations.

    According to federal prosecutors, the SPLC’s alleged operation involved all three stages.

    DOJ LAUNCHES GRAND JURY PROBE INTO MARXIST MOGUL NEVILLE ROY SINGHAM’S FUNDING OF LEFTIST GROUPS

    SPLC Intelligence Project Director Heidi Beirich speaks during an event on Jan. 12, 2018.(David Buchan/Variety/Penske Media via Getty Images)

    Without naming the finance and intelligence chiefs, a grand jury indictment made public in April revealed that “Employee-1” and “Employee-2” in 2008 created a secret network of nine bank accounts at “Bank-1” and “Bank-2” that funneled millions of dollars to far-right extremists from 2014 through 2023. The initial indictment put the amount at $3 million, but it was increased to $4.1 million in a superseding indictment.

    The indictment notes that “individuals at the SPLC” were the ones who “secretly funneled donated money to the Fs,” including “Employee-1,” a “person who would become the Chief Financial Officer, and “Employee-2,” a “person who would become the Director of the Intelligence Project.”

    Federal officials told Fox News Digital that Hutchison, who moved from the position of treasurer and corporate secretary to chief financial officer, is “Employee-1.” They said “Employee-” 2 is Beirich, who started in 1999 as a newly-minted Ph.D. student, and was named deputy director of the Intelligence Project in 2004 and later director of the Intelligence Report.

    Synovus Bank’s corporate headquarters is located in Columbus, Ga.(Synovus Bank)

    The duo allegedly created a banking account structure under names that didn’t identify the SPLC. The nine shell entities were dubbed “Center Investigative Agency,” “Fox Photography,” “Imagery Ink,” “J&J Electronics,” “Kelly’s Marine,” “North West Technologies,” “Tech Writers Group” and “Turner Personnel” and “Rare Books Warehouse.”

    Federal prosecutors allege the accounts were used to pay informants while concealing the source of the money. The government’s theory is that the accounts became the financial infrastructure supporting a sprawling money laundering operation.

    Federal prosecutors allege the accounts remained active for years, surviving leadership transitions and internal turmoil at one of the nation’s most influential civil-rights organizations.

    TOP SPLC OFFICIAL ALLEGEDLY FUNNELED $1.2M TO NEO-NAZI INFORMANT WHO WAS SECRET ROMANTIC PARTNER

    Video

    Over two decades, Beirich became one of the nonprofit’s most influential figures, shaping how “far-right extremism,” “White supremacy” and “neo-Nazi hate” were documented, defined and communicated.

    She testified before Congress, and appeared regularly on television and radio. Journalists, academics and policymakers frequently turned to her for analysis of White-nationalist groups, anti-government movements and domestic extremism. By 2017, ABC News described her as “the woman tracking hate in America.”

    In contrast, Hutchison maintained a low profile and was rarely photographed, working quietly behind the scenes. In 2017, she was on the renewal document for the nonprofit’s “Mississippi Charitable Registration” as the SPLC’s treasurer and secretary, the custodian of financial records and one of the nonprofit’s two “check signers.”

    The SPLC listed its official bank as Sterling Bank, a Synovus Bank subsidiary based in Montgomery.

    In October 2019, Beirich co-founded a new 501(c)(3) nonprofit, “Global Project Against Hate and Extremism,” with a mailing address just three miles away from SPLC headquarters in Alabama’s capital.

    Two months later, Beirich left SPLC after 20 years, according to her LinkedIn profile, just as the dragnet was closing in on the alleged pay-to-hate operation she’d been running for years. According to the SPLC’s tax filing that year, she last earned a salary of $173,090 and a bonus of $25,721.

    The alleged violations continued after Beirich’s and Hutchison’s tenures at SPLC.

    FIRST ON FOX: SPLC’S TAX-EXEMPT STATUS UNDER THREAT AFTER FIERY CAPITOL HILL HEARING

    Video

    One of the alleged recipients of secret SPLC payments was Erich Gliebe, the former chairman of a neo-Nazi organization, National Alliance. Known as “The Aryan Barbarian” during his time as a boxer, Gliebe allegedly received more than $140,000 from the SPLC between 2016 and 2023.

    At the same time he was allegedly collecting payments, Gliebe was featured in SPLC materials describing extremist figures and organizations. An SPLC “Extremist Files” profile dedicated to Gliebe contained a link through which visitors could donate to the organization.

    The SPLC features Erich Gliebe, “the Aryan Barbarian,” as an extremist and collects donations off the page, even though it allegedly paid him for years as an informant.(Southern Poverty Law Center)

    Gliebe didn’t respond to requests for comment.

    Daniel Harvill, a Virginia attorney who represented National Alliance members in litigation involving Gliebe, described Gliebe as an ineffective leader.

    “Gliebe was a joke,” Harvill told Fox News Digital. “He didn’t know how to run a business or political organization. There was a large pile of stupid among them.”

    Harvill said bitterness from that litigation may have contributed to Gliebe becoming an SPLC informant.

    The SPLC’s current president and CEO, Margaret Huang, on the left, and a Moms for Liberty member on the right.(Getty)

    Court filings indicate that larger accounts associated with the alleged operation remained active until August 2020, when the hidden account structure finally drew scrutiny from bank officials. Synovus Bank did an internal investigation, according to court filings. That review became a pivotal moment in the government’s case.

    According to the indictment, around Sept. 9, 2021, the SPLC “President and Chief Executive Officer” and the SPLC “Board Chair” admitted in writing to Bank-1 – Synovus Bank – that the fictitious accounts were “opened for the benefit of the Southern Poverty Law Center operations and operated under the Center’s authority.”

    They signed a document also stating that “pursuant to the discussion we had earlier this week…the accounts had been opened and operated for the benefit of the organization.” The CEO was Huang, federal sources told Fox News Digital.

    Huang’s acknowledgment now sits near the center of the government’s legal theory that the account structure wasn’t the work of rogue employees but operated under organizational authority.

    The nonprofit and its sister organization, the SPLC Action Fund, had hired Huang the year earlier, describing her as an “internationally renowned human and civil rights leader,” previously serving as executive director of Amnesty International USA.

    It isn’t clear who the board chair was at the time of the signing, but former Goldman Sachs executive Bennett Grau was a board member at the time. Grau didn’t respond to repeated requests for comment.

    Huang’s role in signing the admission hasn’t been publicly disclosed before.

    SPLC INDICTMENT BUILDS MOMENTUM FOR BESSENT’S TREASURY TO PROBE PARTISAN NONPROFITS

    Scott Bessent speaks during “Meet the Press” on March 22, 2026.(NBC/MeetThePress)

    SPLC last listed Hutchison on its IRS 990 filing for the period ending on Oct. 31, 2022. According to that IRS filing, she last earned $237,749 and a bonus of $32,697.

    In early July 2025, Huang announced her resignation as president, stepping down “to prioritize family life.” The board of directors named constitutional scholar and former SPLC Board Chair Bryan Fair as interim president and CEO.

    The role of senior SPLC officials in this alleged operation raises significant red flags for law enforcement, federal officials told Fox News Digital, saying the alleged activity reflects a structured ecosystem directed from the top. Investigators describe an operation in which financial flows, informants, public content and political work by the SPLC and its sister organizations were closely linked, with senior officials like Hutchison and Beirich positioned to control the money, narrative and influence of the SPLC.

    INDICTED SPLC CHIEF FACES HOUSE GRILLING OVER ALLEGED SECRET PAYMENTS TO KKK MEMBERS

    In October 2017, Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz speaks to Fox News about the Southern Poverty Law Center smearing him as an “anti-Muslim extremist.”(Fox News)

    The court proceedings represent a form of vindication for some targets of the SPLC.

    Back in October 2017, the SPLC and three other groups – Media Matters, ReThink Media and the Center for New Community – released a publication titled “Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists.” In interviews at the time, Beirich confirmed that Democratic billionaire George Soros’s Open Society philanthropy had provided funding for the production of the report.

    The report included Maajid Nawaz, a British Muslim reformer who founded the Quilliam Foundation to combat Islamist extremism. The next year, in 2018, he sued the SPLC for defamation, winning a $3.375 million settlement and a public apology.

    Nawaz recently told Fox News Digital that the SPLC’s alleged system of paying extremists is corrupt, and he feels vindicated by the federal prosecution against the nonprofit.

    “They were funding both sides,” Nawaz said. “If you control the rules of the game… you’re able to control where the hate comes from… and then control the reaction.”

    “They were taking money to fight hate,” he said, “and then [funding the very hate they] took money to fight.”

    As the SPLC mounts its defense, Nawaz said, “This indictment demonstrates clearly that the SPLC should now cease to exist. It should come to an end.”

    Fox News Digital’s Bonnie Chu and Adriana James-Rodil contributed to this report.

    Asra Nomani is senior editor of investigations at Fox News Digital. She is a former reporter at the Wall Street Journal, where she covered stories related to money, politics and society. She is the author of “Woke Army: The Left-Green Alliance That Is Undermining America’s Freedom.” She can be reached at asra.nomani@fox.com and on X at @asranomani.

  • 美国司法部在最高法院赢得第二修正案相关案件后,威胁就州级枪支法律提起诉讼


    2026-07-01T18:06:48.599Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:蒂尔尼·斯尼德、宝拉·里德

    1小时2分钟前发布
    发布于 美国东部时间2026年7月1日下午2:06


    2022年6月在檀香山家中,夏威夷步枪协会主席凯诺阿·卡库正在检查自己的一把私人枪支。
    马可·加西亚/美联社

    代理司法部长托德·布兰奇威胁将对四个州提起诉讼,这些州的枪支限制法律与上周被最高法院推翻的夏威夷州法律类似。
    他同时警告那些正在考虑制定“效仿”夏威夷州法律的州,它们也可能面临美国司法部的诉讼。特朗普政府已将挑战枪支监管规定列为优先事项,包括周三宣布的两起新诉讼。

    “如果我们必须起诉他们,我们当然会这么做,他们也确实该被起诉,”布兰奇在周三的新闻发布会上说道。“但……最高法院已经明确告知各州他们违反了宪法,本司法部本不该再出面提醒各州这一点。”

    夏威夷州此前的法律规定,枪支在对公众开放的私人场所默认被禁止,除非场所所有者明确同意携带枪支。最高法院以6比3的意识形态分歧投票裁定该法律违反第二修正案,判决意见中指出新泽西州、马里兰州、纽约州和加利福尼亚州四个州也有类似法规。特朗普政府支持挑战这项所谓“默认禁令”的夏威夷枪支拥有者,并在最高法院庭审中辩称该禁令违宪。

    特朗普政府正在其最新一轮的第二修正案诉讼浪潮中,测试其他枪支监管规定的合宪性。

    周三,该政府宣布对弗吉尼亚州的攻击性武器禁令提起法律挑战,旨在推翻美国第四巡回上诉法院维持这类枪支禁令的先例。与此同时,最高法院也计划在下一个开庭期审理一起关于此类禁令合宪性的案件。
    此外,美国司法部还单独提起了针对加利福尼亚州的诉讼,起诉该州禁止半自动机枪转换套件手枪的法律,这类枪支通常被称为格洛克手枪。

    Justice Department threatens lawsuits over state gun laws after Second Amendment win at Supreme Court

    2026-07-01T18:06:48.599Z / CNN

    By Tierney Sneed, Paula Reid

    1 hr 2 min ago

    PUBLISHED Jul 1, 2026, 2:06 PM ET

    Kainoa Kaku, president of the Hawaii Rifle Association, checks one of his personal firearms while at his home in June 2022 in Honolulu.

    Marco Garcia/AP

    Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche threatened lawsuits against four states that have gun restrictions similar to the Hawaii law that the Supreme Court struck down last week.

    He also warned states considering laws that “mirror” Hawaii’s that they could face Justice Department lawsuits as well, as the Trump administration has made challenges to firearm regulations a priority, including with two new lawsuits announced Wednesday.

    “If we have to sue them, of course, we will, and they should be sued,” Blanche said at a news conference Wednesday. “But … it shouldn’t take this Department of Justice telling a state they’re violating the Constitution when the Supreme Court told them they were.”

    The Hawaii law said that guns are presumptively banned on private property open to the public unless the property-owner gives explicit consent for firearm carry. The Supreme Court, divided on 6-3 ideological lines, said the law violated the Second Amendment in an opinion that noted that four other states — New Jersey, Maryland, New York and California — have similar statutes. The Trump administration supported the Hawaii gun-owners who challenged the so-called default ban and presented arguments before the Supreme Court that it was unconstitutional.

    The Trump administration is testing the constitutionality of other firearm regulations in its latest blitz of Second Amendment litigation.

    On Wednesday, it announced a legal challenge to Virginia’s ban on assault weapons that seeks to overturn US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals precedent upholding that type of firearms prohibition. The case comes as the Supreme Court also plans to hear a case next term on the constitutionality of those kinds of bans as well.

    Additionally, the Justice Department unveiled a separate lawsuit against California for its ban on semiautomatic machinegun convertible pistols, which are commonly known as Glocks.

  • 美国宣布不会延长与加拿大和墨西哥的关键贸易协议


    2026-07-01T13:48:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻(CBS News)

    作者
    亚伦·纳瓦罗 数字记者
    亚伦·纳瓦罗是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的数字记者,曾报道2024年大选,还曾在2021年和2022年选举周期担任哥伦比亚广播公司新闻政治部门的助理制片人。

    阅读完整简历

    更新时间:2026年7月1日 / 美国东部时间下午3:37 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    据美国贸易代表办公室消息,美国已决定不延长与加拿大和墨西哥的关键贸易协定。

    7月1日是三国决定是否将《美国-墨西哥-加拿大协定》(USMCA)延长至2042年的截止日期。特朗普政府的这一决定意味着《美国-墨西哥-加拿大协定》将继续生效,并在2036年到期前接受为期10年的年度审查,除非各方达成另一项延长协议。

    美国贸易代表贾米森·格里尔在一份声明中表示:“美国将继续与墨西哥和加拿大接触,以解决该协定的缺陷以及我们与这两个国家的贸易逆差问题。不过,在这些问题得到解决之前,或者在协定终止之前,该协定仍将有效。”

    聚焦美国贸易逆差

    特朗普总统于2020年签署《美国-墨西哥-加拿大协定》成为法律,取代了1994年的《北美自由贸易协定》。

    该协定降低了美国、墨西哥和加拿大之间的贸易壁垒,旨在为美国工人创造就业机会,并提振美国制造业。除其他变更外,该协定收紧了汽车行业的规则,要求每辆汽车75%的零部件必须在北美生产,才能免征进口关税。

    2020年在密歇根州的一次活动中,特朗普将该协定称为“我们有史以来签署的最公平、最平衡、最有益的贸易协定”。但此后他对该协定的态度发生了转变。特朗普在6月对记者表示,没有这份协定,美国“作为一个国家会发展得更好”。

    一名特朗普政府高级官员告诉记者,《美国-墨西哥-加拿大协定》未能缓解美国与加拿大和墨西哥之间的贸易逆差。该官员表示:“我们认为,《美国-墨西哥-加拿大协定》并未如总统所愿起到控制逆差的作用。”

    美国贸易代表办公室表示,美国计划于7月20日当周与墨西哥举行新一轮双边谈判。这位高级政府官员称,在这些谈判中,两国将讨论原产地规则、知识产权以及围绕墨西哥遵守劳工义务的担忧。

    该官员未提及与加拿大会晤的具体计划,但表示:“我们将继续与加拿大伙伴进行磋商。”

    谈判可能耗时数年

    特朗普政府可能会在10年后协定到期前完全退出《美国-墨西哥-加拿大协定》,不过这一决定可能取决于谈判的进展情况。贸易专家表示,这些谈判可能会拖延数年。

    这位高级政府官员表示希望快速解决贸易协定的主要症结,并补充说,特朗普可以在2028年任期结束前与墨西哥和加拿大达成修改贸易协定的协议。

    “总统对此仍持怀疑态度,但我认为继续谈判符合我们国家的利益,”该官员补充道。

    贸易专家表示,美国退出《美国-墨西哥-加拿大协定》的影响将取决于是否有双边贸易协定取代该协定。

    投资咨询公司凯投宏观(Capital Economics)的经济学家在一份报告中表示:“如果没有双边协议,加拿大和墨西哥的经济增长都将放缓,因为过去一年支撑两国外部经济的关税豁免将被取消。”

    他们补充道:“但考虑到平均关税税率只会升至10%,而非此前根据《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)威胁征收的高得多的税率,因此可以避免经济衰退。”

    编辑:阿兰·谢尔特

    U.S. says it won’t extend key trade deal with Canada and Mexico

    2026-07-01T13:48:00-0400 / CBS News

    By
    Aaron Navarro Digital Reporter
    Aaron Navarro is a CBS News digital reporter. He covered the 2024 elections and was previously an associate producer for the CBS News political unit in the 2021 and 2022 election cycles.

    Read Full Bio

    Updated on: July 1, 2026 / 3:37 PM EDT / CBS News

    The U.S. has decided not to extend a key trade pact with Canada and Mexico, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative.

    July 1 was the deadline for the three countries to decide whether to extend the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, until 2042. The Trump administration’s decision means the USMCA remains in effect and subject to annual reviews for 10 years, until it expires in 2036, unless another agreement is reached to extend it.

    “The United States will continue to engage with Mexico and Canada to address the agreement’s shortcomings and our trade deficits with these countries,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement. “However, the agreement remains in force pending resolution of these issues or until the agreement’s termination.”

    Focus on the U.S. trade deficit

    President Trump signed the USMCA into law in 2020, replacing the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement.

    The USMCA lowered trade barriers among the U.S., Mexico and Canada, aiming to create jobs for American workers and energize the country’s manufacturing sector. Among other changes, the deal tightened rules for the auto industry, requiring that 75% of each vehicle be produced in North America to avoid any import duties.

    At an event in Michigan in 2020, Mr. Trump described the pact as the “fairest, most balanced and beneficial trade agreement we have ever signed into law.” But he has since soured on the deal. Speaking to reporters in June, Mr. Trump said the U.S. would “do better as a country” without the agreement.

    The USMCA has failed to ease the U.S. trade deficit with Canada and Mexico, a senior Trump administration official told reporters. “We believe that the USMCA does not operate to control the deficit like the president intended,” the person said.

    The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said the U.S. is scheduled to meet with Mexico the week of July 20 for another round of bilateral negotiations. During those talks, the two countries will discuss rules of origin, intellectual property and concerns surrounding Mexico’s compliance with labor obligations, the senior administration official said.

    The official did not discuss specific plans to meet with Canada, but said, “We will continue our discussions with our Canadian partners.”

    Talks could take years

    The Trump administration could decide to withdraw from the USMCA altogether before it expires in 10 years, though that decision will likely depend on how negotiations unfold. Those talks could drag on for years, according to trade experts.

    The senior administration official expressed interest in resolving the major sticking points of the trade deal quickly, adding that Mr. Trump could reach an agreement with Mexico and Canada to alter their trade pact before his term expires in 2028.

    “The president remains skeptical of this, but I think it’s in the interest of our country to keep negotiating,” the person added.

    The impact of a U.S. withdrawal from the USMCA would depend on whether any bilateral trade agreements replaced the pact, according to trade experts.

    “Absent bilateral deals, growth would slow in both Canada and Mexico as the tariff exemption, which has kept both countries’ external sectors afloat over the past year, was removed,” economists with investment advisory firm Capital Economics said in a report.

    “But given the average tariff rate would only rise to 10%, rather than the much higher rates previously threatened under IEEPA, recessions could be avoided,” they added, referring to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

    Edited by Alain Sherter

  • 杰森·米勒将再次入职白宫——肩负信息传递使命


    2026-07-01T18:43:19.879Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:克里斯汀·霍姆斯
    发布时间:2026年7月1日,美国东部时间下午2:43

    唐纳德·特朗普 国会新闻

    2025年9月22日,纽约市纽约时代广场喜来登酒店举办的2025年康科迪亚年度峰会上,前高级顾问、唐纳德·J·特朗普总统及SHW合伙人有限责任公司负责人杰森·米勒在台上发言

    三名知情人士告诉美国有线电视新闻网(CNN),唐纳德·特朗普总统的前顾问兼竞选发言人杰森·米勒预计将再次加入白宫团队。

    其中一名消息人士透露,尽管相关文书和细节仍在敲定中,但米勒很可能将担任一名特别政府雇员,专门负责围绕总统的政绩制定信息传播策略。

    另一位了解相关讨论的消息人士表示,这可能包括引导总统聚焦某些政治议题,并指出米勒自2015年起就与特朗普共事,作为其心腹已赢得了特朗普的信任。

    “杰森是总统信任的左膀右臂,他敬重总统,共事已久,”该消息人士称,“身边有能为总统提供正确政治建议的人始终是件好事。”

    特朗普近期在信息传递上屡屡失误,一再偏离共和党聚焦民生负担与提振经济的核心诉求。他发动的伊朗危机导致汽油价格大幅上涨,上周又突然拒绝签署一项旨在降低住房成本的两党里程碑式法案,随后还将其称为“无聊透顶的东西”。

    但特朗普近期又提出了更符合共和党政治策略的口号——在一系列民主社会主义者赢得初选后,将民主党标签为共产主义者。负责特朗普竞选运作的詹姆斯·布莱尔曾私下透露,将民主党塑造成更糟糕的选择是共和党中期选举战略的核心内容。

    两位消息人士称,白宫办公厅主任苏西·怀尔斯与参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩的亲密盟友约翰尼·德斯特凡诺也预计将加入白宫团队。德斯特凡诺在特朗普第一任期内曾担任总统助理与顾问。

    “他极具影响力,在众议院、参议院和白宫都拥有深厚人脉,将成为极为宝贵的资产,”一位了解该人事决策的消息人士告诉CNN。

    美国有线电视新闻网已联系米勒和德斯特凡诺置评。《华盛顿邮报》最先报道了此次拟议的人事变动。

    Jason Miller set to join White House again — with a messaging mission

    2026-07-01T18:43:19.879Z / CNN

    By Kristen Holmes

    PUBLISHED Jul 1, 2026, 2:43 PM ET

    Donald Trump Congressional news

    Jason Miller, Former Senior Advisor, President Donald J. Trump & Principal, SHW Partners LLC, speaks onstage during the 2025 Concordia Annual Summit at Sheraton New York Times Square on September 22, 2025 in New York City.

    Leigh Vogel/Getty Images for Concordia Annual Summit/File

    President Donald Trump’s former adviser and campaign spokesperson Jason Miller is expected to join the White House, three sources familiar with the matter told CNN.

    While those people said the paperwork and details are still being finalized, Miller will likely take on a special government employee role specific to crafting messaging around the president’s accomplishments, according to one of those sources.

    That could include guiding the president to focus on certain political topics, said another one of the people briefed on the conversations, noting that Miller has earned Trump’s trust as a confidant and has worked with the president dating back to 2015.

    “Jason is a hand that is trusted by the president, he respects him, he’s been around a long time,” that source said. “Having people around him reinforcing correct political advice is always a good thing.”

    Trump has struggled to stay on message lately, repeatedly hijacking the Republican Party’s desire to focus on affordability and improving the economy. His Iran war drove gas prices up sharply, and he last week abruptly refused to sign a landmark bipartisan bill meant to drive down the price of housing, later calling it “a yawn.”

    But he’s latched onto another message lately that is more in line with the party’s political strategy — labeling Democrats as communists after a series of democratic socialist primary wins. James Blair, who is leading Trump’s political operation, has privately outlined that portraying Democrats as the worse option is a central part of the GOP’s midterm strategy.

    Johnny DeStefano, a close ally of White House chief of staff Susie Wiles and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, is also expected to join the White House, two of the sources said. DeStefano served as assistant and counselor to the president during Trump’s first term.

    “He is incredibly influential and has deep relationships that span the House, Senate and White House — he will be a huge asset,” one source familiar with the decision told CNN.

    CNN has reached out to Miller and DeStefano for comment. The Washington Post first reported the proposed staffing changes.

  • 芝加哥联邦首席检察官表示,“布罗德韦尔六人组”不当行为曝光后,逾千起案件正在审查中


    2026年7月1日 美国东部时间下午1:57 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    作者:莎拉·N·林奇

    莎拉·N·林奇 资深司法部记者
    莎拉·N·林奇是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻驻华盛顿特区的资深司法部记者。

    阅读完整简历

    莎拉·N·林奇

    伊利诺伊州北区联邦首席检察官周三表示,在芝加哥联邦检察官因大陪审团滥用职权和检察官不当行为,被迫撤销“布罗德韦尔六人组”案件的指控后,已有超过1000起大陪审团起诉书正在接受审查。

    美国伊利诺伊州北区检察官安德鲁·布特罗斯在华盛顿特区一场无关的新闻发布会上对媒体表示,作为提振大陪审团程序公信力努力的一部分,他的办公室正在审查最早可追溯至2007年的案件中的检察官行为。

    “当所有工作都完成后,我可以告诉大家,伊利诺伊州北区将有远超1000起大陪审团起诉书接受审查,”布特罗斯说道。

    “审查将具有追溯性,涵盖部分案件中近20年前发生的情况,同时也将覆盖目前法院 pending 的所有正在进行的案件。”

    他表示,对当前案件的审查旨在提振公众对司法系统的信心,并确保这些案件不会出现与“布罗德韦尔六人组”案相同的问题。该案涉及去年秋季在伊利诺伊州布罗德韦尔市美国移民海关执法局设施外被捕的一群抗议者。

    近几个月来,检察官不当行为的曝光让布特罗斯面临越来越多的审查。

    在美国地区法官阿普丽尔·佩里罕见地公开了通常保密的大陪审团笔录后,该案宣告失败。笔录显示,检察官在获取对抗议者的起诉书时存在不当行为。

    image
    安德鲁·布特罗斯,伊利诺伊州北区美国检察官,2026年7月1日在华盛顿特区司法部的一场新闻发布会上。内森·波斯纳/阿纳多卢通讯社 盖蒂图片社

    这起丑闻的核心人物是前美国助理检察官谢里·梅克伦堡,她离职后前往伊利诺伊州民主党参议员迪克·德宾的办公室任职。大陪审团笔录显示,她不当“担保”针对被告的证据力度,驳回了对指控持不同意见的大陪审员,并在正式程序之外不当联系了一名大陪审员。

    德宾随后已将她从岗位上解雇。

    布特罗斯针对这些曝光事件宣布实施了一项整改计划。该计划的一部分内容是新增改革举措,布特罗斯表示这些改革为检察官何时需要移交大陪审团材料以及在何种情形下移交划定了“清晰明确的界限”。

    他表示,该计划的第二部分内容是对过往案件开展全面审查,包括梅克伦堡以及该办公室其他检察官经办的案件。

    “这将是一次大规模、全方位的审查,目前已经启动。”

    Top federal prosecutor in Chicago says more than 1,000 cases under review after Broadview Six misconduct revelations

    July 1, 2026 1:57 PM EDT / CBS News

    By Sarah N. Lynch

    Sarah N. Lynch Senior Justice Department Reporter
    Sarah N. Lynch is the senior Justice Department reporter for CBS News, based in Washington, D.C.

    Read Full Bio

    Sarah N. Lynch

    More than 1,000 grand jury presentations are under review after federal prosecutors in Chicago were forced to dismiss charges in the “Broadview Six” case due to grand jury abuses and prosecutorial misconduct, the top federal prosecutor in the district said Wednesday.

    Speaking to the media in Washington, D.C., at an unrelated press conference, U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros for the Northern District of Illinois said his office is scrutinizing prosecutorial conduct in cases that date back as far as 2007, as part of an effort to shore up confidence in the grand jury process.

    “When this is all said and done, I will tell you that well over 1,000 grand jury presentations will be reviewed in the Northern District of Illinois,” Boutros said.

    “They will both be retroactive, looking at what happened in some cases going all the way back almost 20 years. It will cover everything that is happening now that’s pending in court.”

    He said the review of current cases is designed to instill confidence in the system and ensure those cases are not suffering from the same issues as seen with the Broadview Six — a case involving a group of protesters who were arrested outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Broadview, Illinois, last fall.

    Boutros has faced mounting scrutiny after revelations of prosecutorial misconduct came to light in recent months.

    The case fell apart after U.S. District Judge April Perry took the rare step of unsealing usually secret grand jury transcripts which revealed prosecutors had engaged in inappropriate conduct when securing the indictment against the protesters.

    Andrew Boutros, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, at a press conference at the Justice Department in Washington, D.C., on July 1, 2026. Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images

    At the center of the scandal is former Assistant U.S. Attorney Sheri Mecklenburg, who left to take a job working for Sen. Dick Durbin, an Illinois Democrat. The grand jury transcripts showed that she improperly “vouched” for the strength of the evidence against the defendants, dismissed grand jurors who disagreed with the allegations, and improperly contacted one grand juror outside of official proceedings.

    blob:https://www.cbsnews.com/ef0339a1-b327-44cc-9fe4-aa44e7f75cb0

    Durbin has since fired her from her post.

    Boutros, in response to the revelations, announced he has instituted a remediation plan. Part of that plan entails new reforms that Boutros said create “very bright lines” about when prosecutors need to turn over grand jury material and under what circumstances.

    The second part of the plan entails the extensive review of prior cases, including those handled by Mecklenburg as well as by other prosecutors in the office, he said.

    “It’s going to be a massive review, a comprehensive review, and it is underway.”

  • 法院裁定“诱饵丹”可继续留在阿拉斯加选票上,专家警告排序选择投票制设下选民“陷阱”


    2026-07-01T15:01:54-04:00 / 福克斯新闻频道

    诚实选举项目执行董事杰森·斯尼德告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,涉事候选人显然是在试图误导选民

    作者:安德鲁·马克·米勒 福克斯新闻
    发布于2026年7月1日 美国东部夏令时下午3:01

    NEW 你现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    收听本文
    时长5分钟

    阿拉斯加最高法院裁定,挑战参议员丹·沙利文的同名共和党候选人可以继续留在选票上,一名选举专家称这一判决暴露了阿拉斯加排序选择投票制和四分之一初选制度的明显缺陷。

    阿拉斯加最高法院周一裁定,退休教师丹·J·沙利文有资格与现任参议员丹·沙利文一同出现在共和党初选中,维持了下级法院的裁决,尽管共和党人和选举部门辩称丹·J·沙利文的参选是民主党特工策划的“骗局”,目的可能是误导选民、分流现任议员的选票。

    “这显然是在试图误导选民,”诚实选举项目执行董事杰森·斯尼德告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,“相关事实已经相当清楚了。”

    斯尼德指出,阿拉斯加的排序选择投票制(RCV)和丛林初选特别容易被同名候选人的恶意策略利用。与传统的党派初选不同,阿拉斯加的初选不分党派,将前四名晋级者送入大选。

    丹·沙利文指控同名挑战者企图“操纵”阿拉斯加参议院选举

    参议院候选人丹·J·沙利文(左)与阿拉斯加州共和党参议员丹·沙利文(右)同框。(沙利文竞选美国参议院团队;布兰登·贝尔/彭博社/盖蒂图片社)

    斯尼德称,在传统的共和党初选中,他所说的“诱饵”候选人不太可能在大选前淘汰合法的参选者。

    他表示,今年阿拉斯加参议院竞选的初选选票竞争激烈,约有16名候选人参选,近乎相同的姓名可能造成严重混淆。

    共和党人竭力阻止多个“丹·沙利文”出现在阿拉斯加选票上,称参选行为是“骗局”

    参议员丹·沙利文于2014年11月3日在阿拉斯加安克雷奇的PenAir飞机库举行的竞选集会上向人群发表讲话。(大卫·赖德/盖蒂图片社)

    “你实际上同时面临两个问题,”斯尼德说,“没有党派初选,不存在共和党或民主党提名候选人。所有人都在同一场丛林初选中参选,前四名候选人将晋级大选。”

    斯尼德辩称,在传统的党派初选中,他所说的诱饵候选人几乎没有机会阻止合法的共和党提名候选人进入大选。他表示,阿拉斯加拥挤的全党派初选为选民混淆创造了更多可能。

    “如果足够多的选民选错了丹·沙利文,那么这个诱饵就能进入大选,”斯尼德说,“届时选票上就会出现两个名叫丹·沙利文的人。”

    斯尼德表示,排序选择投票制会让问题复杂化,因为在候选人被淘汰后,选票会被重新分配。

    “如果你只给一位候选人排名,那么当该候选人被淘汰时,你的选票也会随之失效,”他说。

    同名挑战者在法院争取参选资格之际,阿拉斯加重磅参议院选举陷入混乱

    众议员玛丽·佩尔托拉于2024年12月3日在华盛顿特区举行的国会圣诞树点亮仪式上发言。(内森·波斯纳/阿纳多卢通讯社)

    他说,另一种可能是,选民可能误将排名第一的人选错了丹·沙利文,将民主党人玛丽·佩尔托拉排在第二位,那么在计票过程中如果诱饵候选人被淘汰,这些选票就会转移给佩尔托拉。

    “这里有各种各样的陷阱,”斯尼德说,“至少,我认为这表明排序选择投票制加上丛林初选特别容易受到这类伎俩的影响。”

    “这绝对不是一个已经成熟的方案,不管那些支持排序选择投票制的人试图向我们推销什么。”

    阿拉斯加最高法院确实规定,选举官员可以在选票上添加额外的识别信息以区分两名候选人,具体的标识设计由选举部门决定。

    丹·J·沙利文被批评者称为“诱饵丹”,他因与民主党顾问安伯·李的关联受到审查。福克斯新闻数字频道通过元数据发现,安伯·李是其竞选启动声明的作者。李此前曾支持佩尔托拉参选,并在今年1月对《国会山报》表示,乐观地认为这位阿拉斯加民主党人将击败现任议员沙利文。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    丹·J·沙利文已报名参选阿拉斯加州联邦参议员,2026年6月26日在阿拉斯加州彼得斯堡拍摄的肖像照。(凯蒂·霍姆隆德/美联社)

    据阿拉斯加选举总监卡罗尔·比彻透露,丹·J·沙利文此前登记的名字是“小丹尼尔·J·沙利文”,但此次申请以“丹·沙利文”的名义参加初选。比彻还指出,他的竞选材料与现任共和党议员的竞选材料视觉风格相似,且他在报名参选前不久才加入共和党,此前与共和党并无关联。

    他的参选结果可能会对该州竞争激烈的参议院选举产生决定性影响。现任参议员丹·S·沙利文正寻求在这个倾向共和的州连任第三届。民主党人希望前阿拉斯加州民主党众议员玛丽·佩尔托拉能在11月击败沙利文,参议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党参议员查克·舒默曾助力佩尔托拉参选。

    丹·J·沙利文的竞选团队在给福克斯新闻数字频道的一份声明中表示:“沙利文先生为阿拉斯加最高法院昨日的决定性胜利感到振奋。如果选举部门仍在纠结如何按照阿拉斯加州法律和以往惯例妥善设计选票,他不予置评,并期待开展竞选活动。”

    福克斯新闻数字频道的亚当·帕克为本报道撰稿。

    安德鲁·马克·米勒是福克斯新闻记者。可在推特@andymarkmiller关注他,或发送爆料邮件至AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com。

    https://www..com/video/6399449550112
    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/df93e292-4688-416d-91c6-565646cd0bcb

    Court keeps ‘Decoy Dan’ on Alaska ballot as expert warns ranked-choice system creates voter ‘traps’

    2026-07-01T15:01:54-04:00 / Fox News

    Honest Elections Project ED Jason Snead told Fox News Digital the candidate in question is ‘clearly’ trying to mislead voters

    By Andrew Mark Miller Fox News

    Published July 1, 2026 3:01pm EDT

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article
    5 min

    Alaska’s highest court ruled that a same-name Republican challenger to Sen. Dan Sullivan can remain on the ballot, a decision an election expert says exposes glaring flaws in Alaska’s ranked-choice voting system and top-four primary.

    The Alaska Supreme Court ruled Monday that Dan J. Sullivan, a retired teacher, is eligible to appear on the Republican primary ballot alongside incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan, affirming a lower court’s decision keeping him on the ballot despite Republicans and the Division of Elections arguing that Dan J. Sullivan’s candidacy is a “sham” attempt orchestrated by Democratic operatives to potentially trip up voters and siphon off votes from the incumbent.

    “It very clearly is an attempt to mislead voters,” Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, told Fox News Digital. “When you look at the facts, they’ve been pretty clearly established.”

    Snead pointed to Alaska’s ranked choice voting (RCV) and jungle primary as especially vulnerable to any nefarious tactics with same-name candidates because, unlike a traditional partisan primary, Alaska advances the top four finishers from a single primary election to the general election, regardless of party.

    DAN SULLIVAN ACCUSES SAME-NAME CHALLENGER OF TRYING TO ‘RIG’ ALASKA SENATE RACE

    Senate candidate Dan J. Sullivan, left, is pictured alongside Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, right.(Sullivan for U.S. Senate; Brandon Bell-Pool/Getty Images)

    Snead argued that under a conventional Republican primary, a candidate he described as a “decoy” would be unlikely to eliminate a legitimate contender before the general election.

    Instead, he said, voters face a crowded top-four primary ballot in this year’s Alaska Senate race, roughly 16 candidates are running, and confusion over nearly identical names could have significant consequences.

    GOP FIGHTS TO STOP MULTIPLE DAN SULLIVANS FROM APPEARING ON ALASKA BALLOT, CALLS CANDIDACY A ‘SHAM’

    Sen. Dan Sullivan addresses the crowd during a campaign rally at a PenAir airplane hangar on Nov. 3, 2014, in Anchorage, Alaska.(David Ryder/Getty Images)

    “You’ve really got two problems in one,” Snead said. “You don’t have any party primary. There’s no Republican nominee or Democratic nominee. You have this jungle primary where everybody runs together, and the top four candidates advance to the general election.”

    Snead argued that under a traditional partisan primary, a candidate he described as a decoy would have little chance of preventing a legitimate Republican nominee from advancing to the general election. Instead, he said, Alaska’s crowded all-party primary creates more opportunities for voter confusion.

    “If enough of them pick the wrong Dan Sullivan, then he makes it into the general,” Snead said. “Now you’ve got two people named Dan Sullivan on the ballot.”

    Snead said the ranked-choice system can compound the problem because ballots are redistributed as candidates are eliminated.

    “If you only rank one person, then your ballot is eliminated if that person is eliminated,” he said.

    ALASKA’S BLOCKBUSTER SENATE RACE THROWN INTO CHAOS AS SAME-NAME CHALLENGER FIGHTS DISQUALIFICATION IN COURT

    Rep. Mary Peltola speaks during the Capitol Christmas tree lighting ceremony in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 3, 2024.(Nathan Posner/Anadolu)

    He said another possibility is that voters could mistakenly rank the wrong Dan Sullivan first and Democrat Mary Peltola second, causing those votes to transfer to Peltola if the decoy candidate is eliminated during tabulation.

    “There are lots of different traps here,” Snead said. “At a minimum, I think this speaks to the fact that ranked-choice voting plus jungle primaries is especially vulnerable to these sorts of games.”

    “It is definitely not an idea that is ready for prime time, no matter what the people that push ranked choice are trying to sell us on.”

    The Alaska Supreme Court did stipulate that election officials could add additional identifying information to the ballot to distinguish between the two candidates, leaving those design decisions to the Division of Elections.

    Dan J. Sullivan, known to his critics as “Decoy Dan,” has come under scrutiny over ties to Democratic consultant Amber Lee, who was revealed as the author of his campaign launch announcement in metadata reviewed by Fox News Digital. Lee has notably supported Peltola’s prior runs for office and expressed optimism to The Hill in January that the Alaska Democrat would unseat the incumbent Sullivan.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Dan J. Sullivan, who has filed to run for U.S. Senate in Alaska, poses for a photo in Petersburg, Alaska, on June 26, 2026.(Katie Holmlund/Associated Press)

    According to Alaska Director of Elections Carol Beecher, Dan J. Sullivan requested to appear on the primary ballot under the name “Dan Sullivan” despite previously registering as “Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr.” Beecher also noted that his campaign materials are visually similar to the incumbent Republican’s campaign and that he had no affiliation with the GOP prior to jumping into the race shortly before the filing deadline.

    The fate of his candidacy could prove decisive in the state’s hotly contested Senate race in which Sen. Dan S. Sullivan is seeking a third term in the Republican-leaning state. Democrats are hoping that former Rep. Mary Peltola, D-Alaska, whom Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., helped recruit into the race, will unseat Sullivan in November.

    In a statement to Fox News Digital, Dan J. Sullivan’s campaign said, “Mr. Sullivan has been buoyed by yesterday’s decisive victory at the Alaska Supreme Court. To the extent that the Division of Elections is still grappling with how it will properly effectuate ballot design in a manner consistent with Alaska law and past practice, he has no comment, and looks forward to running his campaign.”

    Fox News Digital’s Adam Pack contributed to this report.

    Andrew Mark Miller is a reporter at Fox News. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email tips to AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com.

    https://www..com/video/6399449550112
    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/df93e292-4688-416d-91c6-565646cd0bcb