2026年4月14日 美国东部夏令时10:13:45 / 福克斯新闻
拥有401(k)退休账户的美国人若北京采取封锁台湾行动，“将立刻感受到冲击”——艾克·弗赖曼如是说
作者：摩根·菲利普斯 福克斯新闻
发布于2026年4月14日 美国东部夏令时上午10:13
斯坦福大学研究员艾克·弗赖曼表示，北京可能会针对半导体市场制造市场震荡，令美国人的401(k)退休账户及全球经济面临风险。
【新功能】您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章！
收听本文
8分钟
根据一项从近期霍尔木兹海峡局势动荡中吸取教训的最新分析，中国或许无需对台湾发动军事入侵就能引发全球经济危机。
正如伊朗在2026年早些时候所展现的那样，即便只是对关键航运咽喉要道进行有限干预，也能扰乱全球市场：推高物价、破坏供应链、动摇投资者信心。
分析师警告，北京可能会对台湾采取类似策略——台湾是全球先进半导体产业最关键的枢纽。
如果中国明天就采取行动封锁台湾，“拥有401(k)账户的美国人会立刻感受到影响”，斯坦福大学胡佛研究所研究员艾克·弗赖曼在接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时表示。
台湾反对党领导人在北京会晤习近平，台湾防务斗争加剧
台湾半导体供应中断可能会引发全球市场大幅抛售，打击在美国退休投资组合中占比颇高的美国大型科技股。
中国在大规模实弹演习期间向台湾附近区域发射火箭，以军舰、军机和军事压力包围该岛，紧张局势升级。（解放军东部战区/路透社）
长期以来，华盛顿的大部分注意力都集中在阻止中国入侵台湾上，但弗赖曼认为，更大的风险可能是一种更模糊的战略——利用经济压力、军事信号和市场恐慌来孤立台湾，同时避免引发全面战争。
他在本周二出版的新书《捍卫台湾：防止对华战争的战略》中详细阐述了这一观点，并警告北京可能会“兵不血刃地挤压、孤立并迫使台湾屈服”。
近年来，中国大幅增加了在台湾周边的军事活动，开展模拟包围和封锁场景的大规模军演。分析师表示，这些演习反映出中国越来越重视非入侵式的选项。
这一分析发布之际，美国国家情报总监办公室发布的最新年度威胁评估报告显示，中国领导人“目前没有计划发动对台入侵”，且“没有设定实现统一的固定时间表”。
这一结论在华盛顿引发了争论：美国是否过于专注于威慑传统的两栖进攻，而忽视了更渐进的胁迫形式？
中国军事学说长期以来包含所谓的“联合封锁作战”，分析师指出，北京越来越多地通过海军、空军和海岸警卫队行动相结合的方式，释放出孤立台湾的信号。
近年来，中国大幅增加了在台湾周边的军事活动，开展模拟包围和封锁场景的大规模军演。分析师表示，这些演习反映出中国越来越重视非入侵式的选项。
战争研究所和美国企业研究院的分析师也发出类似警告，称中国正在积极演练封锁行动的各个环节，近期的演习模拟了切断台湾主要港口、限制能源和贸易通道通行的行动。
弗赖曼表示，这份情报评估与他的观点一致，即北京的首选战略可能不会升级为全面战争。
“中国的A计划是不战而取台湾，”他说。
中国对台湾的封锁可能会摧毁全球半导体航运。（安·王/路透社）
美国议员警告台湾“应对当下”，与此同时中国开展入侵式军演
分析师表示，中国未必需要实施全面封锁。相反，北京可以依靠军事演习、海上检查和限制区域，提高在台湾海峡开展业务的风险。
仅此一项不确定性，就足以迫使保险公司和航运公司撤离该地区，实际上切断台湾的贸易往来。全球约有一半的集装箱船途经台湾海峡，即便只是有限的中断，也可能波及全球供应链。
战略与国际研究中心近期的一份报告基于26场兵棋推演，分析了中国军队登船和拦截驶往台湾的商船的场景，这将引发全球贸易的广泛中断，并升级冲突风险。
同一分析还发现，尽管中国可能造成严重的经济损害，但封锁并非低风险选项，可能迅速升级为涉及美国及其盟友的更大规模军事冲突。
伊朗在霍尔木兹海峡的行动暂时扰乱了全球约20%的石油供应，引发了能源和金融市场的即时波动。他认为，台湾地区发生类似的中断，后果将更为广泛。
台湾生产了全球约90%的最先进半导体，包括为人工智能系统、消费电子产品和美国军事技术提供动力的尖端芯片。
中国称在反对党领导人访台后将恢复与台湾的部分往来
风险远远超出台湾本身。
半导体供应中断可能会波及全球经济，影响从人工智能开发、美国国防系统到消费电子和汽车制造的各个领域。分析师警告，鉴于最先进层面缺乏可行替代方案，即便台湾芯片产业暂时停产，也可能引发广泛的经济动荡。
这种集中程度长期以来被称为台湾的“硅盾”，即该岛在全球经济中的核心地位会提高任何中断行动的代价，从而起到威慑冲突的作用。
但同样的主导地位也造成了脆弱性。与石油不同，没有战略储备可以抵消突发的半导体供应冲击。
“如果剥夺美国获取先进计算能力的途径，整个人工智能行业都将岌岌可危，”弗赖曼说，“这可能引发类似雷曼兄弟式的连锁反应。”
此类冲击可能会波及金融市场，打击美国大型科技公司，并将全球经济推向衰退，他表示。
弗赖曼还警告，中国甚至可能无需实施全面封锁就能实现其目标，转而依赖已经在使用的渐进式“灰色地带”战术。
中国渔船“民兵”编队彰显对台灰色地带压力上升
“危险在于他们已经在这么做了，”他说。
这些战术可能包括骚扰商业航运和空中交通、对在该地区运营的公司施加监管压力，以及其他旨在增加风险但不触发直接军事回应的措施。他认为，随着时间的推移，这种压力可能会迫使私营企业，尤其是保险公司、航运公司和航空公司，缩减在台湾周边的业务。
随着市场参与者规避风险，这种态势可能会让北京在不费一枪一弹的情况下有效孤立台湾。
不过，分析师 caution 说，台湾海峡的环境比霍尔木兹海峡更为复杂、军事化程度更高，美国海军行动和地区局势也存在显著差异。
台湾也在认真对待这一威胁。
官员们已开始规划演习，以在发生封锁场景时维持关键物资（包括能源）的供应，这凸显出人们越来越担心此类中断并非天方夜谭。
弗赖曼表示，美国必须调整战略以应对这些风险，并警告称，随着与中国的紧张局势在最高层级外交中持续升级，仅靠传统的军事威慑可能已不够。
预计这一问题将成为唐纳德·特朗普总统与中国国家主席习近平定于5月在北京举行的高规格会晤的核心议题，台湾、贸易紧张局势和美国对台军售可能成为讨论的关键要点。
与此同时，他 caution 说，任何战略转变都必须配合稳定的外交姿态，避免传递出软弱或升级冲突的信号。
弗赖曼敦促美国领导人保持一贯且审慎的态度，警告称即便语言或政策出现细微变化，都可能被解读为软弱。
“我们长期奉行一个中国政策。这表明，如果我们的核心立场受到挑战，我们会坚定立场，但同时也会保持克制，”他说。
“我们希望中国和台湾通过谈判解决争端，不使用武力或胁迫手段。”
记者未能立即联系到中国大使馆和台湾外事部门置评。
Hormuz chaos sparks warning: China could strangle Taiwan without firing a shot
2026-04-14 10:13:45 EDT / Fox News
Americans with 401(k)s ‘would feel it right away’ if Beijing moved to choke off the island, Eyck Freymann says
By Morgan Phillips Fox News
Published April 14, 2026 10:13am EDT
Stanford fellow Eyck Freymann says Beijing may trigger market shock targeting semiconductors, putting Americans’ 401(k)s and the global economy at risk.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Listen to this article
8 min
China may not need to launch a military invasion of Taiwan to trigger a global economic crisis, according to a new analysis that draws lessons from recent disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.
As Iran showed earlier in 2026, even limited interference with a key shipping choke point can rattle global markets: spiking prices, disrupting supply chains and shaking investor confidence.
Analysts warn Beijing could apply a similar strategy to Taiwan, the world’s most critical hub for advanced semiconductors.
If China moved to choke off Taiwan tomorrow, “Americans with 401(k)s would feel it right away,” Stanford Hoover Institution fellow Eyck Freymann told Fox News Digital.
TAIWAN OPPOSITION LEADER MEETS XI IN BEIJING AS TAIWAN DEFENSE FIGHT INTENSIFIES
A disruption to Taiwan’s semiconductor supply could trigger a sharp sell-off in global markets, hitting major U.S. technology stocks that make up a significant share of retirement portfolios.
节点运行失败
China launched rockets near Taiwan during massive live-fire drills, surrounding the island with warships, aircraft and military pressure as tensions rise.(PLA Eastern Theater Command/Reuters)
While much of Washington’s focus has long centered on deterring a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, Freymann argues the greater risk may be a more ambiguous strategy — using economic pressure, military signaling and market panic to isolate the island without triggering a full-scale war.
He expands on that argument in his new book, “Defending Taiwan: A Strategy to Prevent War with China,” published Tuesday, warning Beijing could “squeeze, isolate, and coerce Taiwan into submission without firing a shot.”
China significantly has increased military activity around Taiwan in recent years, conducting large-scale exercises that simulate encirclement and blockade scenarios. Analysts say those drills reflect a growing emphasis on options short of invasion.
That analysis comes as a new Annual Threat Assessment released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence found that Chinese leaders “do not currently plan to execute an invasion of Taiwan” and “do not have a fixed timeline for achieving unification.”
The finding has fueled debate in Washington over whether the United States is too focused on deterring a traditional amphibious assault while overlooking more gradual forms of coercion.
Chinese military doctrine has long included what it calls a “joint blockade campaign,” and analysts note Beijing has increasingly signaled its ability to isolate Taiwan through a combination of naval, air and coast guard operations.
China has significantly increased military activity around Taiwan in recent years, conducting large-scale exercises that simulate encirclement and blockade scenarios. Analysts say those drills reflect a growing emphasis on options short of invasion.
Analysts at the Institute for the Study of War and the American Enterprise Institute have similarly warned that China is actively rehearsing elements of a blockade, with recent exercises simulating efforts to cut off Taiwan’s major ports and restrict access to energy and trade routes.
Freymann said the intelligence assessment aligns with his view that Beijing’s preferred strategy may fall short of outright war.
“China’s Plan A is to take Taiwan without a fight,” he said.
A Chinese blockade of Taiwan could shatter global semiconductor shipping.(Ann Wang/Reuters)
US LAWMAKERS WARN TAIWAN TO ‘MEET THE MOMENT’ AS CHINA STAGES INVASION-STYLE DRILLS
Analysts say China would not necessarily need to impose a full blockade. Instead, Beijing could rely on military drills, maritime inspections and restricted zones to raise the risk of operating in the Taiwan Strait.
That uncertainty alone could be enough to drive insurers and shipping companies out of the region, effectively cutting off Taiwan’s trade. With roughly half of the world’s container ships passing through the strait, even limited disruption could ripple across global supply chains.
A recent Center for Strategic and International Studies report, based on 26 war game simulations, examined scenarios in which Chinese forces board and interdict commercial ships bound for Taiwan, triggering widespread disruption to global trade and raising the risk of escalation.
The same analysis found that while China could inflict serious economic harm, a blockade would not be a low-risk option and could quickly spiral into a broader military conflict involving the United States and its allies.
Iran’s actions in the Strait of Hormuz temporarily disrupted roughly 20% of global oil supply, triggering immediate volatility in energy and financial markets. A similar disruption in Taiwan, he argued, would have even broader consequences.
Taiwan produces roughly 90% of the world’s most advanced semiconductors, including the cutting-edge chips that power artificial intelligence systems, consumer electronics and U.S. military technology.
CHINA SAYS IT WILL RESUME SOME TIES WITH TAIWAN AFTER VISIT BY OPPOSITION LEADER
The stakes extend far beyond Taiwan itself.
A disruption in semiconductor supply could ripple across the global economy, affecting everything from artificial intelligence development and U.S. defense systems to consumer electronics and automotive manufacturing. Analysts warn that even a temporary shutdown of Taiwan’s chip industry could trigger widespread economic disruption, given the lack of viable alternatives at the most advanced level.
That concentration has long been referred to as Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” the idea that the island’s central role in the global economy helps deter conflict by raising the stakes for any disruption.
But that same dominance also creates a vulnerability. Unlike oil, there is no strategic reserve to offset a sudden semiconductor supply shock.
“If you take away the United States’ access to advanced compute, there goes the whole AI trade,” Freymann said. “It risks the possibility of a Lehman Brothers-style cascading event.”
China launched rockets near Taiwan during massive live-fire drills, surrounding the island with warships, aircraft and military pressure as tensions rise.(PLA Eastern Theater Command/Reuters)
Such a shock could ripple through financial markets, hit major U.S. technology companies and push the global economy toward recession, he said.
Freymann also warned that China may not even need to impose a full blockade to achieve its goals, instead relying on incremental “gray zone” tactics already in use.
CHINESE FISHING ‘MILITIA’ FORMATIONS SIGNAL RISING GRAY-ZONE PRESSURE ON TAIWAN
“The danger is that they’re already doing it,” he said.
Those tactics could include harassment of commercial shipping and air traffic, regulatory pressure on companies operating in the region, and other measures designed to increase risk without triggering a direct military response. Over time, he argued, such pressure could force private companies, particularly insurers, shipping firms and airlines, to scale back operations around Taiwan.
That dynamic could allow Beijing to effectively isolate the island without firing a shot, as market actors move to avoid risk.
Still, analysts caution that the Taiwan Strait presents a more complex and heavily militarized environment than the Strait of Hormuz, where U.S. naval operations and regional dynamics differ significantly.
Taiwan is also taking the threat seriously.
Officials have begun planning exercises aimed at maintaining access to critical supplies, including energy, in the event of a blockade scenario, underscoring growing concern that such a disruption is plausible.
Freymann said the United States must adapt its strategy to account for these risks, warning that traditional military deterrence alone may not be sufficient as tensions with China continue to play out at the highest levels of diplomacy.
The issue is expected to loom over a high-stakes meeting between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping scheduled for May in Beijing, where Taiwan, trade tensions and U.S. arms sales to the island are likely to be key points of discussion.
At the same time, he cautioned that any shift in strategy must be paired with a steady diplomatic posture to avoid signaling weakness or escalation.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Freymann urged U.S. leaders to maintain a consistent and measured approach, warning that even subtle shifts in language or policy could be interpreted as weakness.
“We have a long-standing one-China policy. It shows that we are resolved if our principal position is tested, but that we’re also restrained,” he said.
“We want China and Taiwan to resolve their disputes through negotiation without force or coercion.”
The Chinese embassy and Taiwan foreign ministry could not immediately be reached for comment.