伊朗局势升级之际美国武器库存仍告枯竭,危及美军应对未来战争的能力


2026-07-12T10:30:26.343Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/12/politics/us-weapon-stocks-depleted-iran-war

美国主要武器库存仍严重枯竭,若继续以当前频率对伊朗发动打击,库存压力将进一步加剧。美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周五重申,此次冲突中的停火协议已经“结束”。

专家告诉美国有线电视新闻网(CNN),武器储备状况可能会影响美军应对与中国甚至朝鲜之间潜在未来战争的能力。

“如果战争继续以过去五天的节奏进行……库存减少的幅度将足以带来新的、更高的风险……在印太地区,”退役海军陆战队上校、战略与国际研究中心防务分析师马克·坎西恩说道。

分析人士和CNN此前的报道显示,被称为“史诗之怒行动”的伊朗冲突初期阶段,美军消耗了数千枚用于远程精确打击以及防御敌方空中和导弹袭击的关键导弹。

布鲁金斯学会外交政策研究主管迈克尔·奥汉隆表示,“毫无疑问”,库存“低于我们的理想水平”。

根据战略与国际研究中心的分析,在美伊全面交战于4月停火时,五角大楼已发射了至少一半的战区高空区域防御(THAAD)弹道导弹拦截弹、近一半的爱国者防空拦截弹,以及约30%的战斧式陆攻导弹。CNN此前通过三名熟悉美国国防部内部库存估算的人士证实了该分析的准确性。

停火协议为美国库存提供了喘息之机,随后几个月的低强度针锋相对袭击所需的美国导弹数量较少。

但坎西恩表示,关键导弹的补给率很低——根据当前财年的交付计划,五角大楼每月仅接收约15枚新战斧导弹和20枚新爱国者导弹。2026年没有战区高空区域防御导弹的交付计划。战略与国际研究中心估计,要将这些库存恢复到伊朗战争前的水平需要三年甚至更长时间。

曾担任五角大楼副审计长和代理审计长的美国企业研究所高级研究员伊莱恩·麦卡斯克告诉CNN,“大多数弹药的补给时间表基本上以年为单位——多数需要两到五年。”

防务采购专家、退役陆军三星少将、同样隶属于美国企业研究所的约翰·法拉利强调,战争爆发以来,国会“未拨款一分钱用于替换任何一枚导弹”,只能依靠“正常、缓慢的年度和平时期流程”。

最近几周,白宫正式向议员们申请补充资金,以支付伊朗冲突的相关费用(以及一些无关项目),但该法案在国会的通过之路艰难。

一名五角大楼官员告诉CNN,该部门“致力于迅速扩大国防工业基础”。特朗普于6月援引《国防生产法案》,取消监管繁文缛节以加快导弹生产,国防部已与制造商签订协议,扩大其生产线。

“国防部正在积极探索并整合美国最优秀的创新技术,无论其来源何处,以实现大规模生产,增强整个供应链的韧性,”这位五角大楼官员说道。

坎西恩表示,援引《国防生产法案》“有所帮助”,但“影响将很小”。扩大生产能力需要时间。

允许德国和乌克兰等其他国家国内生产爱国者拦截弹的许可协议,也可以在全球需求上升之际缓解美国生产线的压力。特朗普于周四在土耳其北约峰会间隙发表讲话时,宣布了向乌克兰发放相关许可。

但这些协议进展缓慢——日本用了三年时间才建成其爱国者工厂,而德国尽管自2022年开始建设生产线,至今仍未生产出一枚爱国者导弹。

根据战略与国际研究中心的分析,其他导弹库存,如精确打击导弹和联合空对地防区外导弹的库存,反弹速度会更快,应能在2027年中至下半年恢复到战前水平。

坎西恩警告称,如果美军继续以高消耗率使用关键导弹,中国冲突场景并非五角大楼可能面临的唯一潜在风险。分析人士认为,美朝战争计划需要大量美国导弹,既用于打击敌方目标,也用于保卫美军和首尔,抵御平壤方面预计发动的大规模袭击。

五角大楼发言人肖恩·帕内尔在一份与4月份提供给CNN的声明完全一致的声明中表示,“美国军队是世界上最强大的军队,拥有在总统选择的时间和地点执行任务所需的一切。”

“我们已在多个作战司令部发起多次成功行动,同时确保美军拥有雄厚的武器库能力,以保护我们的人民和利益,”帕内尔说道。

布鲁金斯学会的奥汉隆表示,他认为美军威慑中国或朝鲜侵略的能力“尚未受损”。

但这位专家警告称,“在某个时刻”威慑可能会减弱。“这可能无法衡量,也无法知晓那个临界点在哪里,因为这在很大程度上取决于对手的心理,”奥汉隆说道。

CNN的扎卡里·科恩和娜塔莎·伯特兰对本文亦有贡献。

戴维斯·温基在CNN的报道得到了Outrider基金会与新闻资助合作伙伴(JFP)之间的合作支持。CNN对报道保留完全的编辑控制权。

Iran war heats up while US weapon stocks remain depleted, risking military’s ability to fight future wars

2026-07-12T10:30:26.343Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/12/politics/us-weapon-stocks-depleted-iran-war

Key US weapons stockpiles remain significantly depleted and will come under even more intense pressure if strikes against Iran continue at the current rate, as President Donald Trump reiterated Friday that the ceasefire in the conflict is “over.”

The situation with armaments could impact the American military’s ability to fight a potential future war with China or even North Korea, experts told CNN.

“If the war continues at the rate it’s been going for the last [five] days … it would reduce stockpiles enough that there would be a new, higher level of risk … with the Indo-Pacific,” said Mark Cancian, a retired Marine Corps colonel and defense analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank.

The early phase of the Iran conflict, dubbed Operation Epic Fury, saw the US military expend thousands of key missiles used for long-range precision strikes and to defend against enemy air and missile attacks, according to analysts and previous CNN reporting.

Michael O’Hanlon, who leads foreign policy research at the Brookings Institution think tank, said there’s “no doubt” that stockpiles are “lower than we would prefer.”

By the time full-scale fighting between the US and Iran stopped in April, the Pentagon had fired at least half of its THAAD ballistic missile interceptors, nearly half of its Patriot air defense interceptors, and around 30% of its Tomahawk land-attack missiles, according to a CSIS analysis. CNN previously confirmed the accuracy of the analysis through three people familiar with internal Defense Department stockpile estimates.

The ceasefire offered a respite for the US stockpile as the low-intensity tit-for-tat strikes in subsequent months required fewer US missiles.

But replenishment rates are low for key missiles, Cancian said — according to current fiscal year delivery schedules, the Pentagon is receiving roughly 15 new Tomahawks and 20 new Patriot missiles per month. There are no THAAD deliveries forecast in 2026. CSIS estimated it would take three or more years to rebuild those inventories to pre-Iran war levels.

Elaine McCusker, an American Enterprise Institute senior fellow who previously served as the Pentagon’s deputy and acting comptroller, told CNN that the “timeline for replenishment of munitions for the most part will be measured in years — two-to-five for most.”

Defense acquisition expert John Ferrari, a retired Army two-star general also affiliated with the American Enterprise Institute, highlighted that “not a single dollar has been appropriated by the Congress to replace a single missile” since the war began, leaving just the “normal, slow yearly peacetime process.”

In recent weeks, the White House formally requested supplemental funding from lawmakers to cover the costs of the Iran conflict (and some unrelated programs), but the measure faces a tough road through Congress.

A Pentagon official told CNN that the department is “committed to rapidly expanding the defense industrial base.” Trump invoked the Defense Production Act in June to remove regulatory red tape and speed missile production, and the Defense Department has inked deals with manufacturers to expand their production lines.

“The Department is aggressively pursuing and integrating the best of American innovation, wherever it resides, to deliver production at scale and drive resiliency across supply chains,” said the Pentagon official.

The Defense Production Act invocation is “helpful,” Cancian said, but “the impact will be small.” And expanding production capacity takes time.

Licensing agreements to allow other countries such as Germany and Ukraine to domestically produce Patriot interceptor missiles could also ease pressure on the US production lines amid rising global demand. Trump announced the license for Ukraine on Thursday while speaking on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Turkey.

But the agreements are slow-moving — Japan needed three years to build its Patriot factory, and Germany is yet to produce a Patriot missile despite starting work on their production line in 2022.

Other missile inventories, such as those for the Precision Strike Missile and the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile, will be quicker to rebound and should reach their pre-war level by mid-to-late 2027, according to the CSIS analysis.

Cancian warned that a China conflict scenario isn’t the only potential risk that the Pentagon may face if it continues to expend key missiles at a high rate. Analysts believe war plans with North Korea call for a significant amount of US missiles, both to hit enemy targets and to defend US forces and Seoul from projected massive strikes by Pyongyang’s forces.

Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell, in a statement identical to one provided to CNN in April, said that “America’s military is the most powerful in the world and has everything it needs to execute at the time and place of the President’s choosing.”

“We have executed multiple successful operations across combatant commands while ensuring the U.S. military possesses a deep arsenal of capabilities to protect our people and our interests,” Parnell said.

O’Hanlon of the Brookings Institution said he doesn’t believe the US military’s ability to deter Chinese or North Korean aggression “has suffered yet.”

But the expert cautioned that “at some point” deterrence could wane. “It’s probably unmeasurable and unknowable where that point might be, since it’s largely about an adversary’s psychology,” said O’Hanlon.

CNN’s Zachary Cohen and Natasha Bertrand contributed to this report.

_Davis Winkie’s work at CNN is supported by a partnership between_Outrider Foundation_and Journalism Funding Partners (JFP). CNN retains full editorial control of the reporting._

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注