2026-05-11T12:23:11-04:00 / 福克斯新闻网
艾萨众议员的决议获众议院司法委员会主席吉姆·乔丹支持
作者:安德鲁·马克·米勒,福克斯新闻网
发布于2026年5月11日美国东部时间下午12:23
乔纳森·特利指出:民主党正将弹劾变成英国式的不信任投票
福克斯新闻特约评论员乔纳森·特利在《生命、自由与莱文秀》节目中深入探讨了第25修正案的历史及其现代应用。
【新功能】您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!
收听本文
时长:6分钟
【福克斯新闻独家报道】 加利福尼亚州共和党众议员达雷尔·艾萨提出一项决议,旨在推翻众议院对唐纳德·特朗普总统的两次弹劾。他表示,此举将纠正民主党利用“明知虚假”的声明,以党派手段破坏总统声誉的行径。
这项编号为H.Res.1211的决议已提交众议院司法委员会,决议宣称,众议院分别于2019年和2021年通过的针对特朗普的两项弹劾案,应正式“撤销,仿佛此类条款从未在众议院全院获得通过”。
“事实是,宪法并未规定当某人被错误起诉时该如何处理,”艾萨对福克斯新闻数字频道表示,“弹劾本质上就是起诉,而且是一种你无法真正脱罪的起诉。如果你被众议院弹劾,众所周知,你该去哪里恢复自己的名誉,这是个问题。”
“这正是我们目前面临的难题:总统遭到了错误指控,如今已有证据表明当时存在隐瞒信息和虚假信息的情况,但我们该如何挽回这种负面影响?答案是我们回到国会,回到众议院全院进行投票。”
格雷格·贾勒特:长期隐藏的文件显示,第一次特朗普弹劾案完全是一场骗局
2026年5月8日,华盛顿白宫南草坪,唐纳德·特朗普总统在登上海军一号前与记者交谈。(何塞·路易斯·马加纳/美联社)
“更重要的是,”艾萨解释道,他希望自己的这项举措能“确保弹劾过程中存在不当行为这一事实和真相得到听证”,因为“真正重要的是,我们必须在国会和美国人民面前阐明我们的立场”。
该决议指出,2019年的弹劾案基于不可靠且带有政治偏见的信息,并提到新解密的材料削弱了触发此次调查的匿名举报人投诉的可信度。
决议声称,该举报人并不掌握第一手资料,在据称带有政治偏见的其他官员的协助下行事,而众议院调查人员处理或歪曲证据的方式不当,同时剥夺了特朗普当面驳斥指控者的机会。
特朗普弹劾案举报人律师起诉政府撤销其安全许可
2025年9月17日,华盛顿特区,达雷尔·艾萨众议员在众议院司法委员会听取联邦调查局局长卡什·帕特尔作证时聆听发言。(内森·波斯纳/安纳多卢通讯社 via 盖蒂图片社)
今年早些时候,国家情报总监图尔西·加巴德在一份新闻稿中宣布解密相关文件,称这些文件揭露了情报界内部“协调一致的行动”,旨在“制造一场阴谋,并以此作为2019年弹劾特朗普总统的依据”。
艾萨表示,民主党在弹劾过程中“违反了众议院的所有规则”,艾萨办公室一位不愿具名的消息人士对福克斯新闻数字频道透露,知名民主党人士私下承认,弹劾案曝光后的信息“让众议院颜面尽失”,且“反映了国会山和华盛顿出了什么问题”。
该决议认为,2021年的弹劾案进程仓促且程序存在缺陷,指出众议院从提出议案到通过仅用了两天时间,并未开展全面的证据审查程序。尽管议员们与宪法专家举行了一场简短的委员会听证会,但该议案在没有传唤事实证人或进行深入调查的情况下获得通过,决议称这剥夺了特朗普享有的基本正当程序权利。
“他们实质上以一场叛乱、一项真正的重罪为由弹劾了他,但这是虚假的,”艾萨说。
白宫驳斥民主党对1月6日事件的“欺骗性”言论,发布周年抨击报道
吉姆·乔丹众议员表示:“民主党出于政治动机提出指控,将弹劾作为对付特朗普总统的武器。”(凯文·迪奇/盖蒂图片社)
此前曾有过撤销弹劾案的尝试,包括2022年和2023年的多项决议,但均未获得听证、 markup(注:指委员会审议并修改议案的程序)或全院投票,并在第118届国会结束时胎死腹中。
艾萨对福克斯新闻数字频道表示,此前的决议没有本次决议措辞强硬,且“不具备我们现在拥有的条件”,也就是“有力的论据,即我们如今要审判的是指控方的不当行为,而非总统本人,因为弹劾他所依据的信息,正是提出这些指控的人明知是虚假的”。
此外,艾萨的这项努力得到了国会共和党高层之一、众议院司法委员会主席、俄亥俄州共和党议员吉姆·乔丹的支持。
“民主党出于政治动机提出指控,将弹劾作为对付特朗普总统的武器,”乔丹对福克斯新闻数字频道表示,“我们赞扬艾萨主席牵头这场斗争,将这场骗局从记录中抹去。”
这项举措也得到了其他众议院共和党议员的大力支持。目前已有超过20名联署议员,名单包括:纽约州共和党众议员克劳迪娅·特尼、威斯康星州共和党众议员斯科特·菲茨杰拉德、南卡罗来纳州共和党众议员拉塞尔·弗莱、密苏里州共和党众议员马克·奥尔福德、田纳西州共和党众议员蒂姆·伯切特、加利福尼亚州共和党众议员汤姆·麦克林托克、俄亥俄州共和党众议员戴维·J·泰勒、怀俄明州共和党众议员哈丽雅特·哈格曼、佐治亚州共和党众议员里克·艾伦、佐治亚州共和党众议员里奇·麦考密克、俄亥俄州共和党众议员迈克尔·鲁利、伊利诺伊州共和党众议员玛丽·米勒、佐治亚州共和党众议员迈克·柯林斯、威斯康星州共和党众议员格伦·格罗思曼、佛罗里达州共和党众议员吉米·帕特里尼斯、堪萨斯州共和党众议员特蕾西·曼、密歇根州共和党众议员蒂姆·瓦尔伯格、田纳西州共和党众议员约翰·罗斯、南卡罗来纳州共和党众议员乔·威尔逊、北卡罗来纳州共和党众议员戴维·鲁泽尔、田纳西州共和党众议员戴安娜·哈什巴格,以及德克萨斯州共和党众议员罗尼·杰克逊。
艾萨的决议重新引发了一场宪法争议:众议院是否可以追溯性地撤销其已经通过的弹劾案。支持者认为,既然宪法赋予众议院“弹劾的唯一权力”,那么众议院也有权管理自身的记录,并投票撤销此前的行动。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
2025年9月8日,华盛顿特区,达雷尔·艾萨出席年度电影制片人协会颁奖晚宴暨招待会。(盖蒂图片社)
包括部分法律学者在内的批评者认为,尽管众议院可以表达反对意见或在记录中加以注释,但它无法抹去弹劾案这一历史事实,也不能在弹劾程序完成后撤销宪法程序,因此此类努力在很大程度上只是象征性的。
“我们的目标是证明弹劾是虚假的,而且是恶意的虚假指控,因此它不应再作为一项合法指控存在,以免日后有人拿它说事,比如‘反对君主制’之类的,”艾萨说。
“当你被诬告时,无论时隔数日、数周、数月还是数年,有些人应该和当初刊登最初指控时一样,热衷于在头版刊登更正声明,”艾萨解释道,“这就是我们想要实现的目标:让合法的更正声明至少获得与虚假指控相同程度的关注。”
福克斯新闻数字频道已联系白宫征求评论。
安德鲁·马克·米勒是福克斯新闻记者。可在推特@andymarkmiller关注他,或发送爆料邮件至AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com。
GOP lawmaker unveils historic move to ‘expunge’ both ‘maliciously false’ impeachments against Trump
2026-05-11T12:23:11-04:00 / Fox News
Rep Issa’s resolution has support from House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan
By Andrew Mark Miller, Fox News
Published May 11, 2026 12:23pm EDT
Democrats are making impeachment like an English vote of no confidence, Jonathan Turley argues
Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley dives into the history of the 25th Amendment and its modern applications on ‘Life, Liberty & Levin.’
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Listen to this article
6 min
FIRST ON FOX:Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., has introduced a resolution aimed at reversing the two impeachments of President Donald Trump in the House of Representatives in a move he says will rectify a situation where Democrats used “knowingly false” claims in a partisan attempt to destroy the president’s reputation.
The resolution, H.Res.1211, referred to the House Judiciary Committee, declares that both of Trump’s impeachments, approved by the House in 2019 and 2021, should be formally “expunged as if such Article had never passed the full House of Representatives.”
“The fact is that the Constitution doesn’t spell out what to do when you’ve wrongfully indicted somebody,” Issa told Fox News Digital. “An impeachment is basically an indictment and it’s an indictment that you can’t really be acquitted from. If you are impeached by the House, famously where do you go to get your reputation back, is the question,”
“And that’s sort of a problem that we’re dealing with, which is that the president was wrongfully accused, the evidence is now out that there was withheld information and false information, but where do we go to unring this bell? And the answer is we go back to Congress and we go to the House floor and we have a vote.”
GREGG JARRETT: LONG-HIDDEN DOCUMENTS REVEAL FIRST TRUMP IMPEACHMENT WAS A TOTAL FRAUD
President Donald Trump walks to speak with reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington on May 8, 2026.(Jose Luis Magana/AP)
“More importantly,” Issa explained, is that he hopes his process will “make sure that the facts and the reality that there was misconduct in the process gets a hearing” because that’s “really where this becomes a big deal is that we really have to make our case in front of Congress and in front of the American people.”
The resolution makes the case that the 2019 impeachment was based on unreliable and politically biased information, pointing to newly declassified material that it says undermines the credibility of the anonymous whistleblower whose complaint triggered the inquiry.
It contends the whistleblower lacked firsthand knowledge, was assisted by other officials with alleged political bias, and that House investigators mishandled or misrepresented evidence while denying Trump the opportunity to confront his accusers.
LAWYER OF WHISTLEBLOWER IN TRUMP IMPEACHMENT CASE SUES ADMINISTRATION OVER REVOKED SECURITY CLEARANCE
Rep. Darrell Issa listens during a House Judiciary Committee hearing with FBI Director Kash Patel in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 17, 2025.(Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
In a press release earlier this year, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced the declassification of documents she says revealed a “coordinated effort” within the intelligence community “to manufacture a conspiracy that was used as the basis to impeach President Trump in 2019.”
Issa says the Democrats “broke every House rule” in their impeachment quests, and a source close to Issa’s office told Fox News Digital that prominent Democrats have admitted in private that information revealed since the impeachments “reflects so poorly on the House” and “represents an example of what’s gone wrong in the Capitol and in Washington.”
The resolution argues that the 2021 impeachment was rushed and procedurally flawed, noting that the House moved from introduction to passage in two days and did not conduct a full evidentiary process. While lawmakers held a brief committee hearing with constitutional experts, the measure advanced without fact witnesses or extended investigation, which the resolution says denied Trump basic due process.
“They impeached him for essentially an insurrection, a true high crime, and it’s false,” Issa said.
WHITE HOUSE TORCHES DEMOCRATS’ JAN 6 ‘GASLIGHTING’ CLAIMS IN ANNIVERSARY TAKEDOWN
Rep. Jim Jordan said, “Democrats weaponized impeachment against President Trump with politically motivated charges.”(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Previous attempts have been made to reverse the impeachments, including resolutions in 2022 and 2023, but never received hearings, markups or floor votes, and died at the end of the 118th Congress.
Issa told Fox News Digital that the previous resolutions were not written as strongly as this one and “didn’t have what we have,” which is “the compelling case to say the misconduct of the accusation is now what we’re going to have on trial rather than the president because he was impeached with information that the very people who brought it knew was wrong.”
Additionally, Issa’s effort has the backing of one of the top Republicans in Congress, House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.
“Democrats weaponized impeachment against President Trump with politically motivated charges,” Jordan told Fox News Digital. “We applaud Chairman Issa for leading the fight to expunge this sham from the record.”
The effort also has strong support from other House Republicans. A list of over 20 cosponsors includes: Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., Scott Fitzgerald, R-Wis., Russell Fry, R-S.C., Mark Alford, R-Mo., Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., Tom McClintock, R-Calif., David J. Taylor, R-Ohio, Harriet Hageman, R-Wyo., Rick Allen, R-Ga., Rich McCormick, R-Ga., Michael Rulli, R-Ohio, Mary Miller, R-Ill., Mike Collins, R-Ga., Glenn Grothman, R-Wis., Jimmy Patronis, R-Fla., Tracey Mann, R-Kan., Tim Walberg, R-Mich., John Rose, R-Tenn., Joe Wilson, R-S.C., David Rouzer, R-N.C., Diana Harshbarger, R-Tenn., and Ronny Jackson, R-Texas.
Issa’s resolution reignites a constitutional argument about whether the House can retroactively nullify an impeachment it has already adopted. Supporters contend that because the Constitution gives the House the “sole Power of Impeachment,” it also has authority over its own records and can vote to expunge prior actions.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Darrell Issa attends the annual MPA awards ceremony and reception in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 8, 2025.(Getty Images)
Critics, including some legal scholars, argue that while the House can express disapproval or annotate its records, it cannot erase the historical fact of an impeachment or undo the constitutional process once it has occurred, making such efforts largely symbolic.
“Our goal is to show that it’s false and it was maliciously false and, as a result, it should no longer stand as a legitimate accusation to then be played upon when people are saying, ‘No Kings,’” Issa said.
“When you’ve been falsely accused, whether it’s days, weeks, months or years later, somebody should be just as interested in printing that retraction on the front page as they were in putting the original charge on the front page,” Issa explained. “And that’s what we’re trying to achieve, is to have the legitimate retraction receive at least some semblance of the same attention as the false accusations did.”
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment.
Andrew Mark Miller is a reporter at Fox News. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email tips to AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com.
发表回复