2026-07-03T04:00:48-04:00 / 福克斯新闻
这项以6票对3票通过的裁决维持了第14修正案的保障条款，而这正是特朗普曾试图通过行政命令予以废除的内容
作者：汉娜·布伦南 福克斯新闻
发布时间 2026年7月3日 美国东部时间凌晨4:00 | 更新时间 2026年7月3日 美国东部时间凌晨4:06
最高法院驳回特朗普终止出生公民权诉求，议员态度出现分化
共和党议员表示国会应推动立法遏制“生育旅游”，而民主党议员则称赞该裁决是宪法的胜利，凸显出围绕总统下一步行动的分歧。（图片来源：尼古拉斯·巴拉西 为福克斯新闻数字频道拍摄）
【新功能】您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/c7a5a9a9-9198-465d-92ba-663a920f3f2a
收听本文
时长：3分钟
国会山的议员们对最高法院驳回唐纳德·特朗普总统终止出生公民权诉求的裁决反应不一，该裁决进一步确认在美国出生的儿童将被承认为美国公民。
“这是一个糟糕的裁决，”佛罗里达州共和党众议员拜伦·唐纳兹告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。
“应该在外国人入境前就加以监管——杜绝他们仅仅为了生孩子就来美国然后离开的情况，”加利福尼亚州民主党众议员罗·卡纳说道。
“在入境移民程序方面应该有监管。但这并不意味着一旦孩子在美国出生，我们就要剥夺他们的公民身份，”他补充道。
共和党议员指责最高法院背叛美国，推动限制出生公民权和孕妇访客的法案
在最高法院驳回特朗普终止出生公民权诉求后，罗·卡纳、美国最高法院和拜伦·唐纳兹分别发表了看法。（图片来源：香农·芬尼/盖蒂图片社 美国全国广播公司供稿；李锐/新华社 盖蒂图片社供稿；内森·波斯纳/阿纳多卢通讯社 盖蒂图片社供稿）
这起案件让两党议员阵营出现分裂，其争议点在于特朗普试图将出生公民权与第14修正案脱钩的行政命令。大多数接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访的民主党议员认为，如果裁决结果相反，将被认定为违宪。
“我认为他们的判决是正确的，”得克萨斯州民主党众议员克里斯琴·梅尼菲说道。“最高法院明确了宪法的含义。如果有人还对第14修正案的内容有疑问，我觉得这有点可笑。所以我很高兴他们做出了正确的判决。”
特朗普遭遇最高法院重大挫败，大法官们维持出生公民权判决
2026年2月16日，得克萨斯州众议员克里斯琴·梅尼菲（D-TX）在休斯顿市第34街贝尔塔举办的DJ迈克尔·5000·瓦茨国王日活动上发表讲话。瓦茨于2026年1月30日去世，享年52岁。（图片来源：马库斯·英格拉姆/盖蒂图片社）
“我拥护宪法，”南卡罗来纳州民主党众议员詹姆斯·克莱伯恩在被问及该裁决时表示。
“宪法就是宪法。如果你不喜欢宪法，你可以尝试修改它，”罗德岛州民主党众议员赛斯·马格齐纳说道。“但说实话，我认为我们国家面临的问题比美国公民凭借出生权成为公民这件事要严重得多。”
这项6票对3票的裁决凸显了特朗普移民政策遭遇的重大挫败，此前特朗普一直批评出生公民权是“非法移民的磁石”。
最高法院就出生公民权裁决发布后，移民海关执法局加强执法，五天内逮捕1万人
视频
“我认为总统对这个国家的移民存在执念，”马里兰州民主党众议员萨拉·埃尔弗雷思说道。“他一心想要让移民的处境尽可能艰难。我们在移民海关执法局的行动中已经多次看到这一点，在针对第14修正案的攻击中也同样如此。”
大法官克拉伦斯·托马斯、尼尔·戈萨奇和塞缪尔·阿利托是三名持不同意见的大法官——他们认为第14修正案并未保障所有父母非法且临时居留美国的孩子拥有出生公民权。阿利托指出，该裁决未能认清“生育旅游”现象的抬头，即外国人为了让孩子出生在美国而入境，这可能会给国家安全带来威胁。
【点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用】
明尼苏达州民主党众议员伊尔汉·奥马尔和加利福尼亚州民主党众议员玛克辛·沃特斯拒绝就该裁决向福克斯新闻数字频道置评。
“美国人民应该感到高兴，因为宪法比某个人的意见更重要，”密西西比州民主党众议员本尼·汤普森说道。
汉娜是福克斯新闻数字频道政治团队的制作助理。
WATCH: Controversial SCOTUS decision strikes a divide among lawmakers
2026-07-03T04:00:48-04:00 / Fox News
The 6-3 ruling preserves the 14th Amendment guarantee that Trump had sought to end via executive order
By Hannah Brennan Fox News
Published July 3, 2026 4:00am EDT | Updated July 3, 2026 4:06am EDT
Lawmakers split after Supreme Court rejects Trump’s birthright citizenship bid
Republicans say Congress should pursue legislation to curb “birth tourism” while Democrats praise the ruling as a victory for the Constitution, exposing the divide over the president’s next move. (Credit: Nicholas Ballasy for Fox News Digital)
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/c7a5a9a9-9198-465d-92ba-663a920f3f2a
Listen to this article
3 min
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill had split reactions to the Supreme Court’s ruling to strike down President Donald Trump’s bid to end birthright citizenship, further allowing children born in the United States to be recognized as U.S. citizens.
“It’s a terrible decision,” Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., told Fox News Digital.
“Regulate folks before they come in — in terms of not coming here just to have a baby and leave,” Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said.
“In terms of the immigration process coming in, there should be regulation. Not that once you’re born here that we’re going to denaturalize you,” he continued.
REPUBLICAN ACCUSES SCOTUS OF BETRAYING US, PUSHES BILL RESTRICTING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, PREGNANT VISITORS
Rep. Ro Khanna, the U.S. Supreme Court and Rep. Byron Donalds weighed in after the high court rejected President Donald Trump’s bid to end birthright citizenship.(Shannon Finney/NBC via Getty Images; Li Rui/Xinhua via Getty Images; Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
The case, which left many Republicans and Democrats divided, challenged Trump’s executive order to detach birthright citizenship from the 14th Amendment. Most Democrats who Fox News Digital spoke to argued that if the ruling had gone the other way, it would have been considered unconstitutional.
“I think they got it right,” Rep. Christian Menefee, D-Texas said. “The Supreme Court said that the Constitution says what it says. That if anybody even has a question about what the 14th Amendment says, I think it’s a little embarrassing. So I’m glad they got it right.”
TRUMP SUFFERS MAJOR SUPREME COURT DEFEAT AS JUSTICES UPHOLD BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP
Rep. Christian Menefee (D-TX) speaks onstage during DJ Michael 5000 Watts King’s Day at The Bell Tower on 34th in Houston, Texas, on February 16, 2026. Watts passed away on January 30, 2026, at the age of 52.(Marcus Ingram/Getty Images)
“I believe in the Constitution,” Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., said when asked about the ruling.
“The Constitution is the Constitution. If you don’t like the Constitution, you can try to change it,” Rep. Seth Magaziner, D-R.I., said. “But honestly, I think we’ve got much bigger problems as a country than Americans trying to live their lives as birthright citizens.”
The 6-3 decision highlights a significant loss for Trump’s immigration agenda as he has criticized birthright citizenship as a “magnet for illegal immigration.”
ICE SURGES ENFORCEMENT, MAKES 10,000 ARRESTS IN FIVE DAYS AMID SUPREME COURT BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP DECISION
Video
“I think the president has an obsession with immigrants in this country,” Rep. Sarah Elfreth, D-Md., said. “He’s hell-bent on making it as uncomfortable as possible. We’ve seen that time and again with ICE, we’ve seen this with an attack on the 14th Amendment.”
Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Samuel Alito were the three to dissent — arguing the 14th Amendment does not guarantee birthright citizenship to all children born to parents who are unlawfully and temporarily in the country. Alito cited that the ruling fails to recognize the rise of “birth tourism,” the concept that foreigners come to America just to give birth, potentially opening the door to national security threats.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., and Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., declined to comment on the ruling to Fox News Digital.
“Americans should be happy, because the Constitution means more than one guy’s opinion,” Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said.
Hannah is a Production Assistant for the Politics team at Fox News Digital.
发表回复