2026年7月2日 美国东部时间下午2:12 / 福克斯新闻
民主党众议员唐·戴维斯打破党内立场，对最高法院支持州跨性别体育相关法律的裁决表示支持
作者：亚当·帕克 福克斯新闻
最高法院维持州政府禁止跨性别运动员参加女子体育赛事的禁令
美国妇女关注协会发言人梅西·佩蒂·查尔斯和美国助理检察官朱莉·哈米尔在《福克斯新闻@夜间》节目中讨论了最高法院允许各州禁止跨性别运动员参加女子校队体育赛事的裁决。
全新功能：您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章！
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/60c3f289-00ae-4167-a842-83b837ce458d
收听本文
5分钟
在最高法院打击跨性别运动员权益后，国会民主党人对可能采取的后续行动保持沉默，这凸显了这个在11月中期选举前继续分裂党内的政治敏感议题。
法院周二裁定，各州可以禁止生理男性参加女子和女性校体育队，这项裁决维持了爱达荷州和西弗吉尼亚州的相关法律，并实际上保留了其他25个基于生理性别限制运动员参赛的州的类似法律。
这项在共和党人中引发欢呼的裁决，并未干涉其余仍允许生理男性参加女子和女性体育队的州。
进步派民主党人尖锐批评了这项裁决，而该党绝大多数当选官员并未发表公开声明。但似乎没有人概述任何立法应对措施。
2026年6月30日，在华盛顿特区，民众在最高法院外举行抗议，反对法院维持州政府禁止跨性别运动员参加女子和女性校队体育赛事的裁决。（法新社 盖蒂图片社）
特朗普政府因跨性别学生政策威胁削减堪萨斯州学区经费
“我想让所有跨性别孩子知道，国会里有人在为你们而战，”加州民主党众议员莎拉·雅各布斯在社交媒体发布的视频中说道。“我们将站出来支持所有女性和女孩，这其中包括跨性别女性和女孩。”
雅各布斯是众议院民主党领导层的新晋成员，同时也是跨性别平等特别工作组的联合主席，但她并未说明民主党是否会推出立法来应对最高法院的这项裁决。
倡导LGBTQ权利的民主党联盟国会平等核心小组，以及众议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党众议员哈基姆·杰弗里斯，同样未概述任何立法应对措施。不过，平等核心小组在社交媒体上发布了一系列言论抨击这项裁决，称其对跨性别运动员来说是“毁灭性的”。
福克斯新闻数字频道联系了雅各布斯、杰弗里斯和国会平等核心小组的发言人征求评论，但未收到回复。
此次回应相对克制之际，民调 consistently 发现公众普遍反对跨性别运动员参加女子体育赛事，包括在民主党选民中，这表明部分议员可能与自己的选民立场不一致。
2026年1月13日，在华盛顿特区，反对跨性别运动员参加女子体育赛事的抗议者聚集在最高法院外。（希瑟·迪尔 盖蒂图片社）
《纽约时报》2025年开展的一项民调显示，近八成美国人反对生理男性参加女子体育赛事。根据该民调，约70%的民主党人或“倾向民主党”的选民持这一观点。
来自党内温和派的民主党人在很大程度上对法院的裁决保持沉默。
福克斯新闻数字频道对库克政治报告的选举数据进行分析后发现，几乎没有面临共和党人激烈连任挑战的民主党议员就法院的裁决发表评论。
北卡罗来纳州民主党众议员唐·戴维斯正在共和党占优势的选区寻求第三个众议院任期，他在法院裁决发布后发表了积极声明。
“美国最高法院作出了一项重要裁决，确认各州拥有基于生理性别设立独立体育队的合法权力，”戴维斯在一份书面声明中说道。“第九修正案在扩大女性和女孩的体育机会方面发挥了至关重要的作用，我们必须继续维护这些机会。”
北卡罗来纳州民主党众议员唐·戴维斯是少数几位对最高法院维持基于生理性别限制女子体育赛事的州法律的裁决表示支持的民主党人之一。（大卫·耶泽尔 档案照片）
民主党人因女性历史博物馆法案中的“生理”措辞发起抗议
华盛顿州民主党众议员玛丽·格卢森坎普·佩雷斯是11月中期选举中共和党重点攻击的目标，同时也是平等核心小组成员，她周三承认，跨性别权利运动在女子体育问题上忽视了部分“细微差别”。
“在那些市政厅会议上，我看到最愤怒的人当中，很多人在过去12年里一直开车送女儿去参加体育训练，他们认为孩子获得大学教育的最佳途径就是体育奖学金，”佩雷斯在接受美国有线电视新闻网采访时说道。“所以，当我们急于进行道德说教，说‘这全是爱与恨的对立’时，我认为我们忽视了一些细微差别。”
这位华盛顿州民主党议员并未直接表明她是否同意法院的裁决。
在参议院，对这项裁决的回应寥寥无几。福克斯新闻数字频道向多名民主党议员办公室询问，若他们在参议院夺回多数席位，是否会寻求挑战最高法院的这项裁决，但未得到回复。
值得注意的是，参议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党参议员查克·舒默对此问题保持沉默，同一天他还称赞了最高法院支持出生地公民权的裁决，并在几天前发帖称参加了纽约市的骄傲游行。
不过，参议院中一些最直言不讳的跨性别权利支持者确实发表了看法，誓言将“继续战斗”以维护跨性别运动员的权益。
2025年6月20日，在华盛顿特区，示威者在最高法院外举行集会，手持彩色烟雾装置。（布莱恩·多齐尔/中东图片社 法新社）
马萨诸塞州民主党参议员埃德·马基是参议院最早支持LGBTQ权利的议员之一，他提出了《跨性别权利法案》，他指责最高法院的裁决“再次为特朗普和MAGA共和党人歧视跨性别群体扫清了道路”。
“这项裁决将跨性别运动员从她们的队伍和热爱的运动中驱逐出去，”正在与马萨诸塞州民主党众议员赛斯·莫尔顿展开激烈连任角逐的马基在X平台上说道。“我们将继续战斗。歧视和仇恨不会得逞。”
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
马萨诸塞州民主党参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦也发表了评论，指责“右翼极端分子和MAGA运动”“决心 singled out、针对并伤害跨性别群体”。
“我的心与跨性别孩子及其家人同在，”她在X平台上说道。“我不会停止为他们而战。”
Democrats stay quiet on next steps after Supreme Court transgender sports ruling
July 2, 2026 2:12pm EDT / Fox News
Democrat Rep Don Davis broke ranks with his party, cheering the Supreme Court decision that upheld state transgender sports laws
By Adam Pack Fox News
Supreme Court upholds state bans on transgender athletes in girls sports
Concerned Women for America spokesperson Macy Petty Charles and Assistant United States Attorney Julie Hamill discuss the Supreme Court’s decision allowing states to ban transgender athletes from competing in girls sports on ‘Fox News @ Night.’
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/60c3f289-00ae-4167-a842-83b837ce458d
Listen to this article
5 min
Congressional Democrats are staying mum about their potential next moves after the Supreme Court dealt a blow to transgender athletes, underscoring a politically fraught issue that continues to divide the party ahead of the November midterm elections.
The court ruled Tuesday that states may bar biological males from competing on girls and women’s school sports teams, upholding laws in Idaho and West Virginia and effectively preserving similar laws in the 25 other states that restrict participation based on biological sex.
The ruling, which prompted cheers among Republicans, did not interfere with the remaining states that continue to allow biological males on girls and women’s sports teams.
Progressive Democrats sharply criticized the decision, while the vast majority of elected officials in the party did not issue public statements. None, however, appeared to outline any legislative response.
Young women demonstrate outside the Supreme Court as the court upheld state laws barring transgender athletes from competing in girls and women’s school sports in Washington, D.C., June 30, 2026.(AFP via Getty Images)
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION THREATENS KANSAS SCHOOL DISTRICT FUNDING OVER TRANSGENDER STUDENT POLICY
“I want every trans kid to know that there are people here in Congress fighting for you,” Rep. Sarah Jacobs, D-Calif., said in a video posted to social media. “We are going to stand up for all women and girls, which includes trans women and girls.”
Jacobs, a junior member of House Democratic leadership and co-chair of the Trans Equality Task Force, did not say whether Democrats would introduce legislation in response to the court’s ruling.
The Congressional Equality Caucus, a Democratic-aligned group advocating for LGBTQ rights, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., also did not outline any legislative response. The Equality Caucus, however, posted a series of comments on social media slamming the decision, including decrying the outcome as “devastating” for transgender athletes.
Fox News Digital reached out to spokespeople for Jacobs, Jeffries and the Congressional Equality Caucus for comment but did not hear back.
The relatively muted response comes as public polling has consistently found broad opposition to transgender athletes in women’s sports, including among Democrats, suggesting that some lawmakers may be out of step with their own voters.
Protesters against transgender athletes competing in women’s sports gathered outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., Jan. 13, 2026.(Heather Diehl/Getty Images)
A survey conducted by The New York Times in 2025 found that nearly eight in 10 Americans opposed biological males competing in women’s sports. Roughly 70% of Democrats or those who “lean Democrat” held that view, according to the poll.
Democrats hailing from the centrist side of the party were largely quiet about the court’s ruling.
Few Democratic lawmakers facing competitive re-election challenges from Republicans commented on the court’s decision, a Fox News Digital analysis of Cook Political Report election data found.
Rep. Don Davis, D-N.C., who is seeking a third House term in a Republican-leaning district, issued a positive statement following the court’s ruling.
“The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling affirming that states possess the legal authority to maintain separate sports teams based on biological sex,” Davis said in a written statement. “Title IX has played a vital role in expanding athletic opportunities for women and girls, and we must continue safeguarding those opportunities.”
Rep. Don Davis, D-N.C., was among the relatively few Democrats who expressed support for the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding state laws restricting women’s sports based on biological sex.(David Yeazell, File)
DEMOCRATS REVOLT OVER ‘BIOLOGICAL’ WORDING IN WOMEN’S HISTORY MUSEUM BILL
Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., a top GOP target in November’s midterm elections and a member of the Equality Caucus, acknowledged Wednesday that the trans rights movement misses some of the “nuance” about women’s sports.
“At those town halls, what I saw was that the people who were the most upset, a lot of them had spent the last 12 years driving their girls to sports practice, and they view their best shot of their student getting a college education as an athletic scholarship,” Perez told CNN in an interview. “And, so, when we rush to moralize and be like, ‘This is all about love vs. hate,’ I think we miss some of the nuance.”
The Washington Democrat did not directly state whether she agreed with the court’s ruling.
In the Senate, responses to the decision were few and far between. Requests for comment from several Democratic lawmakers’ offices on whether they would seek to challenge the court’s decision should they regain a majority in the upper chamber went unanswered.
Notably silent on the issue was Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who lauded the Supreme Court’s decision upholding birthright citizenship the same day and had posted about attending New York City’s Pride parade days before.
Some of the most vocal supporters of trans rights in the upper chamber did, however, weigh in, vowing to “keep fighting” for transgender athletes.
Demonstrators hold colored smoke devices during a rally outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on June 20, 2025.(Bryan Dozier/Middle East Images via AFP)
Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., one of the earliest supporters of LGBTQ rights in the Senate, who introduced the Trans Bill of Rights, charged that the court’s decision “again cleared the way for Trump and MAGA Republicans to discriminate against the trans community.”
“This decision tears trans athletes from their teams and the sports they love,” Markey, who is in a tight bid for re-election against Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., said on X. “We will keep fighting. Discrimination and hate will not win.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., also weighed in, accusing “right-wing extremists and the MAGA movement” of being “determined to single out, target, and harm the trans community.”
“My heart is with trans kids and their loved ones,” she said on X. “I won’t stop fighting for them.”
发表回复