2026年6月23日 美国东部时间晚上7:24 / 福克斯新闻
这份以2比1通过的裁决撤销了下级法院以正当程序为由阻止该政策的命令
作者：伊莱恩·马伦，福克斯新闻
福克斯新闻司法记者戴维·斯彭特在《美国报道》节目中详细介绍了亚伯拉罕·埃尔莫西略·阿尔瓦雷斯——所谓袭击白宫UFC赛事阴谋的主谋。
周一，特朗普政府在移民政策上取得重大胜利：联邦上诉法院恢复了全国范围的快速遣返政策，为国土安全部重启对符合条件的非法移民进行快速递解扫清了道路。
该裁决允许联邦移民当局迅速驱逐在美国境内被发现的某些移民，前提是这些移民未被合法入境或假释进入美国，且无法证明他们已在美国连续居住至少两年。
在这份2比1的裁决中，美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院撤销了下级法院阻止该政策的命令，认为挑战者不太可能在其主张中胜诉——即该扩张违反了宪法规定的正当程序保护。
“国土安全部因此行使了自由裁量权，在法律允许的最大范围内适用其快速遣返权限，”贾斯汀·沃克法官代表法院写道。
特朗普的移民海关执法局推出大胆的法院移民逮捕策略 加速遣返拜登曾规避的行动
2025年11月17日，美国移民和海关执法局及执法与驱逐行动局的联邦执法人员在华盛顿进行了一次交通拦截并拘留了多人。(亚历克斯·布兰登/美联社照片)
国土安全部对该裁决表示赞赏。
“多年来，国土安全部专断地将快速遣返限制在14天以内，尽管该政策适用于过去两年内非法入境的非法外国人，”国土安全部总法律顾问詹姆斯·珀西瓦尔在给福克斯新闻数字频道的一份声明中说道。“今天，哥伦比亚特区巡回法院维护了我们依法行事的决定。现在领取2600美元支票和免费返乡航班还为时不晚！”
该裁决推翻了由拜登任命的美国地区法官贾·科布发布的全国性暂缓执行令，科布法官认为该政策存在重大风险，即个人可能在获得有意义的机会证明自己可免于快速遣返之前就被错误驱逐。
特朗普政府最早于2019年特朗普第一任期内将快速遣返政策扩展至全国范围。拜登政府后来废除了该政策，随后国土安全部在特朗普2025年1月重返总统职位后不久恢复了这一政策。
多数派法官认为，宪法要求政府在非法移民面临递解出境时通知他们，并给予他们回应的机会，但并不要求移民官员解释每一个可能阻止其被驱逐的潜在法律抗辩理由。
上诉法院在移民裁决中为特朗普赢得短期胜利，击败博阿斯伯格
“宪法要求的是告知个人政府正在采取的行动及其依据，以及给予回应的机会，”沃克写道。“这并不要求政府解释个人如何才能胜诉。”
法院驳回了相关论点，即国土安全部必须主动告知个人，他们可以通过证明自己已在美国连续居住至少两年来避免快速遣返。
“如果正当程序要求政府告知个人两年连续居住规则，那么 presumably 也要求告知他们每一个对抗快速遣返的依据，”沃克写道。“‘造路运动’没有提出限制性原则，也没有为如此宽泛的要求找到任何依据。”
多数派还驳回了有关错误驱逐案例证明该政策本身违宪的主张。
“诚然，记录中有证据表明，一些外国人尽管已在美国居住两年以上，但仍被错误地纳入了快速遣返范围，”裁决意见中写道。“如果确实如此，那就是违法行为。但问题根源在于个别官员未遵守法律——而非我们正在审议的书面指令本身存在缺陷。”
国土安全部部长马克韦恩·穆林2026年6月3日周三在华盛顿出席众议院国土安全委员会就国土安全部2027财年预算请求举行的听证会。(克利夫·欧文)
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
罗伯特·威尔金斯法官持不同意见，他认为国土安全部的程序没有给移民提供有意义的机会来证明他们已在美国连续居住至少两年，因此可能不符合快速遣返的资格。
“国土安全部所使用的程序，没有给非公民提供有意义的机会来证明他们已在美国连续居住满两年，”威尔金斯写道。
伊莱恩·马伦是福克斯新闻数字频道和福克斯商业频道的撰稿人，报道全国政治。
Biden judge overruled on key Trump immigration policy
June 23, 2026 7:24pm EDT / Fox News
The 2-1 ruling vacates a lower court order that had blocked the policy on due process grounds
By Elaine Mallon, Fox News
Fox News Justice correspondent David Spunt has the details on Abraham Hermosillo Alvarez, the alleged ringleader of a plot to attack the White House UFC event, on ‘America Reports.’
The Trump administration scored a major immigration win Monday after a federal appeals court revived its nationwide expedited removal policy, clearing the way for the Department of Homeland Security to resume fast-track deportations of eligible illegal immigrants.
The ruling allows federal immigration authorities to quickly remove certain migrants found anywhere in the country if they were not lawfully admitted or paroled into the U.S. and cannot show they have continuously lived in the country for at least two years.
In a 2-1 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated a lower court order that had blocked the policy, concluding that challengers were unlikely to succeed on their claims that the expansion violates constitutional due process protections.
“DHS thereby exercised its discretion to apply its expedited-removal authority to the maximum extent allowed by law,” Judge Justin Walker wrote for the court.
TRUMP’S ICE LAUNCHES BOLD COURTHOUSE MIGRANT ARREST STRATEGY TO FAST-TRACK DEPORTATIONS BIDEN AVOIDED
Federal law enforcement officers with Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Enforcement and Removal Operations conducted a traffic stop and detained people in Washington on Nov. 17, 2025.(Alex Brandon/AP Photo)
DHS praised the ruling.
“For years, DHS has arbitrarily limited expedited removal to 14 days even though it applies to illegal aliens who entered the country illegally within the last two years,” DHS General Counsel James Percival said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “Today, the D.C. Circuit vindicated our decision to apply the law as written. It’s not too late to take a $2,600 check and a free flight home!”
The ruling reverses a nationwide stay issued by U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, a Biden appointee, who found the policy created a significant risk that individuals could be wrongly deported before having a meaningful opportunity to prove they were exempt from expedited removal.
The Trump administration first expanded expedited removal nationwide during Trump’s first term in 2019. The Biden administration later rescinded the policy before DHS reinstated it shortly after Trump returned to office in January 2025.
The majority concluded that the Constitution requires the government to notify illegal immigrants when they are facing deportation and give them an opportunity to respond, but does not require immigration officials to explain every potential legal defense that could prevent their removal.
APPEALS COURT GRANTS TRUMP SHORT-TERM WIN OVER BOASBERG IN IMMIGRATION RULING
“The constitutional requirement is notice of the action the government is taking and the grounds for it, plus an opportunity to respond,” Walker wrote. “It is not a requirement that the government explain how the individual might prevail.”
The court rejected arguments that DHS must proactively inform individuals they can avoid expedited removal by proving they have continuously lived in the United States for at least two years.
U.S. President Donald J. Trump watches the UFC lightweight championship fight during the UFC Freedom 250 event on the South Lawn at the White House on June 14, 2026 in Washington, DC(Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC)
“If due process requires the government to inform individuals of the two-year continuous-presence rule, it presumably also requires informing them of every other basis for contesting expedited removal,” Walker wrote. “Make the Road offers no limiting principle and identifies no authority for so expansive a requirement.”
The majority also dismissed claims that examples of wrongful deportations demonstrated the policy itself was unconstitutional.
“To be sure, the record contains evidence that some aliens have been erroneously subjected to expedited removal despite having been present for more than two years,” the opinion stated. “If so, that’s illegal. But the cause there would be individual officers’ failure to follow the law — not defects in the written directives under review.”
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin testifies before the House Committee on Homeland Security during a hearing on the Fiscal 2027 budget request for the Department of Homeland Security, in Washington, Wednesday, June 3, 2026.(Cliff Owen)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Judge Robert Wilkins dissented, arguing that DHS’s procedures do not give migrants a meaningful chance to prove they have lived in the United States for at least two years and therefore may not qualify for expedited removal.
“DHS is using procedures that do not allow a meaningful opportunity for noncitizens to demonstrate that they have been continuously present in the United States for two years,” Wilkins wrote.
Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.
发表回复