2026年6月23日 / 美国东部时间晚7:59 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
记者雅各布·罗森 司法部报道
加利福尼亚州一名联邦法官发布全国范围禁令,叫停特朗普政府的多项政策,其中包括一项允许在移民法庭实施逮捕的政策,以及另一项取消因涉嫌违反移民法被捕者拘留时长上限的政策。
美国加利福尼亚北区联邦地区法官P·凯西·皮茨周二在一份长达71页的判决书中裁定,上述政策具有任意性,违反了《行政程序法》。他表示,美国移民海关执法局(ICE)和移民审理执行办公室的律师“未能为其行为提供合理的解释”。
在移民法庭实施逮捕的做法始于特朗普政府执政期间,该政策允许联邦执法人员将那些出庭接受移民法官审理的人员拘留。
社区领袖和民主党议员一直强烈反对这一做法,该政策曾导致法庭外走廊出现激烈对峙。他们称,联邦移民执法人员的这种做法让社区民众饱受精神创伤。
皮茨表示,“ICE逮捕的并非那些因与逮捕‘无关’的刑事或民事违法行为出庭的个人,而是根据这些非公民在移民法庭上所面临的移民指控罪名逮捕他们。”
皮茨称,该政策“基于一个虚假前提”,即ICE已正式废除2021年发布的关于在移民法院实施逮捕的过往指导意见,且“未能就取消此前对移民法庭民事执法行动的限制给出合理解释”。
这项允许ICE将被拘留者关押超过12小时的拘留豁免政策,同样侵犯了被拘留者的第五修正案权利,因为他们遭受了“惩罚性监禁条件”,皮茨写道。
皮茨表示,ICE曾将部分被拘留者关押在旧金山的一个移民中心超过12小时——通常是过夜甚至数天——他否决了这项政策,原因是ICE“未能考虑替代方案以解决其羁押能力问题”,而这正是该政策出台的根源。
哥伦比亚广播公司新闻已就此事联系国土安全部置评。
“当法官对被告作出判决时,被告会被拘留。如果一名外籍人士被移民法官下令驱逐出境,理应发生同样的情况,”国土安全部总法律顾问詹姆斯·珀西瓦尔周二晚间在X平台上写道。“一名地区法官作出相反的裁决,纯粹是为反美、开放边境议程服务的司法激进主义。”
另有消息称,纽约一名联邦法官上月裁定,联邦特工不得再在曼哈顿的移民法院实施逮捕。
负责纽约这起案件的美国地区法官P·凯文·卡斯特尔同样认定,特朗普政府取消此前对移民法院执法行动的限制属于“任意且反复无常”的行为。
联邦法官发布禁令 禁止ICE在纽约移民法院实施逮捕
https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/video/federal-judge-issues-stay-banning-ice-from-making-arrests-at-nyc-immigration-courts/
Judge blocks Trump administration from arresting immigrants at courts
June 23, 2026 / 7:59 PM EDT / CBS News
By Jacob Rosen Justice Department Reporter
A federal judge in California issued a nationwide injunction against multiple Trump administration policies, among them one that allowed arrests at immigration courts and another that eliminated the cap on the amount of time an individual arrested for an alleged immigration violation can be detained.
U.S. District Judge P. Casey Pitts in the Northern District of California ruled in a 71-page opinion Tuesday that the policies were arbitrary and violated the Administrative Procedure Act. He said that attorneys for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Executive Office for Immigration Review “failed to provide reasoned explanations for their actions.”
The practice of making arrests at immigration courts began during the Trump administration and enabled federal law enforcement agents to take into custody individuals who were appearing before immigration judges.
Community leaders and Democratic lawmakers have railed against the practice, which has led to dramatic confrontations in the hallways outside courtrooms. They say the tactics used by federal immigration agents are leaving communities traumatized.
Pitts said that “ICE is not arresting individuals who appear for criminal or civil violations ‘unrelated’ to the arrest but instead arresting noncitizens based on the very immigration offenses for which the noncitizens are appearing in immigration court.”
The policy, Pitts said, is “based on a false premise” that ICE had properly rescinded past guidance on arrests at immigration courthouses from 2021, and “fails to provide a rational explanation” for its removal of previous limits on civil enforcement actions at immigration courts.
The detention waiver, which allowed ICE to hold detainees for more than 12 hours, also violated the Fifth Amendment rights of detainees because they were subject to “punitive conditions of confinement,” Pitts wrote.
Pitts said that ICE has held some detainees at an immigration center in San Francisco for more than 12 hours — and often overnight or for multiple days — and struck down the policy because ICE “failed to consider alternative options to address its capacity issues,” which were at the root of the policy’s implementation.
CBS News has reached out to the Department of Homeland Security for comment.
“When a judge sentences a defendant, the defendant is taken into custody. If an alien is ordered removed by an immigration judge, the same should happen,” DHS General Counsel James Percival wrote Tuesday night on X. “A district judge ordering otherwise is naked judicial activism in service of an anti-American, open borders agenda.”
Separately, a federal judge in New York ruled last month that federal agents can no longer make arrests at immigration courthouses in Manhattan.
U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel, the judge in the New York case, similarly found that the Trump administration’s withdrawal of the prior limits on enforcement actions at immigration courts was “arbitrary and capricious.”
Federal judge issues stay banning ICE from making arrests at NYC immigration courts
https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/video/federal-judge-issues-stay-banning-ice-from-making-arrests-at-nyc-immigration-courts/
发表回复