2026-06-19T16:21:24.362Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/19/politics/vances-israel-trump-break-iran
- 副总统JD·万斯向以色列官员发出警告,进一步暗示美以两国紧张关系升级。
- 万斯表示,以色列应停止批评其唯一 remaining 盟友,而唐纳德·特朗普总统此前已多次称以色列在黎巴嫩的行动过于强硬。
- 以色列在黎巴嫩的袭击一再破坏美伊和谈,令特朗普政府感到愤怒。
AI生成摘要经CNN编辑审核。
长期以来的美以盟友关系中,美国与以色列联手发动中东战争一直是一个充满争议的局面。
但周四局势似乎到了临界点,副总统JD·万斯对以色列发表了直言不讳的严厉言论——听上去简直就是一种威胁。
这是特朗普政府数日来发出的一系列警告的高潮,政府显然担心以色列可能破坏美国与伊朗达成的、许多人认为对伊朗过于有利的协议。消息人士告诉CNN,在以色列军方与伊朗支持的激进组织真主党之间的冲突再次危及美伊谈判后,以色列和真主党于周五同意延长停火协议。
这种决裂似乎不可避免,原因有多个:
- 以色列对伊朗战争的目标与美国大相径庭,且其投入程度远高于美国。
- 近年来,以色列在美国的声望已大幅下降。
- 即使是一贯强烈支持以色列的共和党,近期也有许多知名影响力人士严厉批评以色列,并不得不应对其选民基础中日益严重的反犹太主义问题。
- 尽管唐纳德·特朗普总统一直坚定支持以色列,但多年来他也多次传播诸多反犹太主义刻板印象。
- 而且特朗普只有在符合自身利益的情况下才会善待盟友。
如今,本届政府几乎是在直言不讳地喊话:你们应该接受我们给予的条件并感到庆幸,否则后果自负。
美国是否真的会走到“后果自负”那一步仍未可知。但值得注意的是,就连共和党似乎也越来越接近与以色列决裂的临界点。
万斯提到以色列在全球范围内不受欢迎的言论最为引人注目。
“在当前这个时刻,唐纳德·J·特朗普是世界上唯一一个同情以色列国的国家元首,”万斯在周四的新闻发布会上表示。“而他恰好是世界超级大国的国家元首。如果我是以色列政府内阁成员,我可能不会攻击全世界仅剩的唯一一个强大盟友。”
随后万斯反复强调,以色列或许应该谨慎行事。
他指出以色列在多大程度上依赖美国武器,以及一些以色列领导人“需要清醒过来,认清本国所处的现实局势”。
这与周四早些时候发表在《纽约时报》对罗斯·多萨特采访中的强硬论调相呼应,当时这位副总统敦促以色列承认美国一直是“令人难以置信的合作伙伴”,并提及美国的导弹系统如何保护了以色列。
他还暗示以色列应缩减在黎巴嫩的行动,这些行动已经威胁到了脆弱的和平进程。
“你们是一个拥有900万人口的国家,”万斯在谈及以色列时说道。“你们不能只靠杀戮来解决所有的国家安全问题。”
最后这番话呼应了特朗普的观点,后者曾多次称以色列的行动过于强硬。
本月早些时候,特朗普总统承认他曾告诉以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡,以色列在黎巴嫩的行动“疯了”。
特朗普还告诉Axios新闻网,他曾直截了当地警告内塔尼亚胡。
“我说:‘比迪,你最好小心点,否则你很快就会孤军奋战了,’”特朗普说道。
到6月14日,特朗普在社交媒体上谴责以色列袭击贝鲁特,称这场袭击“本不该发生”,并称以色列以此报复的真主党袭击“非常微不足道,毫无意义”。
随后在周二法国举行的七国集团峰会上,特朗普与卡塔尔埃米尔塔米姆·本·哈马德·阿勒萨尼一同发表讲话时,对以色列的批评更加尖锐。
“你们不能每次找人的时候就把一栋公寓楼推倒,因为那些公寓楼里住着很多人,他们并非全都是真主党成员——这一点我可以告诉你,”特朗普说道。
他称以色列最近的报复性袭击“太过分了”。
特朗普随后总结道:“如果不是美利坚合众国……以色列现在就不存在了。以色列百分之百会被从地球上抹去。以色列每个聪明人都知道这一点。”
尽管万斯的言论引发了广泛关注,但特朗普的立场也与之如出一辙。
这一切并不意味着特朗普政府与以色列即将决裂。目前很可能存在一定的造势姿态,以期在和谈期间让明显不满的以色列就范。
或许这一招会奏效。消息人士称,周五在发生致命冲突后,以色列和真主党已同意延长停火协议。
但以色列和内塔尼亚胡也有重大利益,希望从这场战争中榨取最大利益,因为其他国家加入其努力迫使伊朗屈服的机会实属罕见。
显而易见,他们的处境与特朗普政府截然不同,后者似乎只是希望这场战争尽快结束。因此,以色列试图加大美国放手的难度,这是可以预见的。
但即便抛开所有这些不谈,特朗普和万斯以这种口吻谈论以色列这一事实本身就非同寻常。
目前对以色列最大的批评之一是,他们在加沙战争中的行为已经过于出格——包括联合国一个独立委员会在内的一些人甚至称其为种族灭绝——以色列对此予以否认。如果特朗普称以色列的行为过于极端,这将有助于强化这一认知。
这对本届政府来说也是一种极不寻常的对待以色列的方式。
诚然,特朗普经常以恶劣且极具交易性质的方式对待盟友。(看看眼下意大利总理乔治娅·梅洛尼的遭遇就知道了。)但与以色列的联盟一直有所不同。即使内塔尼亚胡本人令特朗普感到沮丧,特朗普似乎也将其视为更具益处、近乎神圣的关系。
然而周四万斯谈论以色列的方式,与他和特朗普去年在椭圆形办公室对乌克兰总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基的施压非常相似——还记得那句“你有没有说过一次‘谢谢’?”。
在这两起事件中,特朗普和万斯都试图让盟友就范,因为后者不愿接受结束战争的某些条件。
但在这起事件中,局势有可能颠覆数十年来的美国外交政策:与以色列的紧密同盟。
Vance’s threat is the latest sign US could be breaking with Israel
2026-06-19T16:21:24.362Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/19/politics/vances-israel-trump-break-iran
- Vice President JD Vance issued a warning to Israel officials that further hints at escalating tensions between the US and Jerusalem.
- Vance said Israel should stop criticizing its sole remaining friend, while President Donald Trump has repeatedly called Israel’s conduct in Lebanon too heavy-handed.
- Israel attacks in Lebanon have repeatedly derailed US-Iran peace talks, angering the Trump administration.
AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.
The United States joining with Israel to launch a war in the Middle East was always a fraught situation for the longstanding US-Israeli alliance.
But things seemed to come to a head Thursday, when Vice President JD Vance had some blunt and harsh words for Israel — words that sounded a whole lot like a threat.
It was the culmination of days of warning signs from the Trump administration, which clearly fears Israel might scupper a US agreement with Iran that many view as way too favorable to the Iranians. Israel and Hezbollah agreed to renew a ceasefire on Friday, sources told CNN, after fighting between the Israeli military and the Iran-backed militant group again jeopardized US-Iran negotiations.
The break seemed inevitable, for several reasons:
- Israel’s goals for the Iran war were substantially different from the United States’ goals, and it was far more invested.
- Israel’s reputation in the US had already substantially declined in recent years.
- Even the still-strongly pro-Israel Republican Party has recently seen many prominent influencers strongly criticize Israel and has reckoned with growing antisemitism in its base.
- While President Donald Trump has aligned strongly with Israel, he’s also trafficked in numerous antisemitic tropes over the years.
- And Trump tends to treat allies well only insofar as it benefits him.
Now, the administration is practically yelling: You guys should take what we’ve given you and be happy, or else.
Whether the US ever gets to the “or else” part remains to be seen. But it’s remarkable that even the Republican Party seems to be increasingly approaching a breaking point with Israel.
Vance’s remarks, in which he pointed to Israel’s worldwide unpopularity, were the most striking.
“Donald J. Trump is the only head of state in the entire world who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time,” Vance said at a press briefing Thursday. “And he happens to be the head of state of the world’s superpower. If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left in the entire world.”
Vance then repeatedly returned to the idea that maybe Israel should tread carefully.
He cited how reliant Israel is on American weapons, as well as the need for some Israeli leaders “to wake up and smell the reality of the situation that country is in.”
That echoed a harsh line in an interview with the New York Times’ Ross Douthat published earlier Thursday, in which the vice president urged Israel to recognize that the US has been an “incredible partner” and cited how US missile systems have protected the Israelis.
He also suggested Israel should scale back its efforts in Lebanon, which have threatened the tenuous peace process.
“You’re a country of nine million people,” Vance said of Israel. “You can’t just kill your way out of solving every single national security problem that you have.”
That last comment echoes Trump, who has several times painted Israel’s conduct as way too heavy-handed.
The US president earlier this month acknowledged telling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he was “crazy” over Israel’s conduct in Lebanon.
Trump also told Axios that he had flatly warned Netanyahu.
“I said, ‘Bibi, you better be careful, or you will be on your own very soon,’” Trump said.
By June 14, Trump took to social media to decry an Israeli attack on Beirut, saying it “should not have happened” and that the Hezbollah attack it was responding to was “very small and meaningless.”
Then Trump got even more critical of Israel in comments alongside Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani on Tuesday at the G7 in France.
“You don’t have to knock down an apartment house every time you’re looking for somebody, because there are a lot of people in those apartment houses and they’re not all Hezbollah — that I can tell you,” Trump said.
He called a recent retaliatory attack from Israel “too much.”
Trump then concluded that, “if it weren’t for the United States of America … Israel would not exist right now. Israel would have been blown off the face of the earth, 100%. And every smart person in Israel knows that.”
While Vance’s comments have gotten all the attention, Trump was barking up a very similar tree.
None of it means Trump and Israel are in for an imminent break. There is likely some posturing going on here, in hopes of keeping a clearly unhappy Israel in line amid peace talks.
And perhaps it will work. Sources said Friday that Israel and Hezbollah had agreed to renew their ceasefire after a deadly clash.
But Israel and Netanyahu also have a major interest in extracting the most they can out of this war, given how rare an opportunity it is for other countries to join their efforts in trying to bring Iran to heel.
They’re simply in a very — foreseeably — different place than the Trump administration, which seems to just want this to be over. So it’s predictable that Israel will try to make it harder for the US to let go.
But even setting all that aside, the mere fact that Trump and Vance are talking in these terms is remarkable.
One of the biggest criticisms of Israel right now is that their conduct in the war in Gaza has simply gone too far — some, including an independent United Nations commission, have even called it genocide — an accusation Israel denies. If Trump says Israel goes way too far, that’s going to help cement that perception.
It’s also just a highly unusual way for the administration to treat Israel.
It’s true that Trump often treats allies poorly and in very transactional ways. (Look at what’s happening right now with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.) But the alliance with Israel has been different. Trump has seemed to view it as more beneficial and almost sacred, even when Netanyahu was personally frustrating him.
Yet the way Vance spoke about Israel on Thursday sounded a lot like his and Trump’s browbeating of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — remember “Have you said ‘thank you’ once?” — in the Oval Office last year.
In both cases, Trump and Vance were looking to put an ally in its place over reluctance to accept certain terms to end a war.
But in this case, the situation is threatening to upend decades of American foreign policy: a close alliance with Israel.
发表回复