快讯:克鲁兹就特朗普伊朗协议敲响警钟,警告切勿向“神权疯子”拨款数十亿美元


2026年6月18日 美国东部时间上午11:58 / 福克斯新闻频道

参议员亚当·希夫称伊朗在获得制裁解除和解冻资金的同时“一无所获”
作者:汉娜·布伦南 福克斯新闻

观看:参议员们就特朗普的伊朗和平协议作出反应:“太丢人了”

共和党和民主党议员就唐纳德·特朗普总统的伊朗和平协议作出反应,两党议员均批评该协议,并对其潜在影响表示担忧。(图片来源:尼古拉斯·巴拉西 福克斯新闻数字频道)

全新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/5303b0c9-1212-4220-917f-181173491513

收听本文
时长:3分钟

两党议员都对唐纳德·特朗普总统新签署的伊朗和平协议表示强烈怀疑,认为该协议让伊朗处境更有利,并质疑美国是否在协议中获得了足够的回报。

在特朗普周四签署谅解备忘录之前,得克萨斯州联邦参议员、共和党人特德·克鲁兹就已提出了议员中最为尖锐的批评,称该协议奖励了敌对政权中的“神权疯子”。

“向想要杀害我们的神权疯子拨款数十亿美元,这可不是个好主意,”克鲁兹对福克斯新闻数字频道表示,“不幸的是,我认为总统在这项协议上收到了糟糕的建议。”

其他共和党人在被问及新协议条款时愤然离场。

特朗普政府公布拟议伊朗协议的全面条款

得克萨斯州联邦参议员、共和党人特德·克鲁兹批评特朗普政府的伊朗谅解备忘录,称该协议将为德黑兰带来数十亿美元的经济利益,而多名议员质疑美国将从中获得什么回报。(埃里克·李/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社;亚历克斯·王/盖蒂图片社)

该谅解备忘录将立即解除制裁,包括豁免伊朗石油出口并解冻其冻结资金,同时为超过3000亿美元的重建和经济发展项目搭建框架。协议还设定了60天的谈判期,旨在就伊朗核计划达成最终协议——包括克鲁兹在内的批评者认为,这些条款将为德黑兰带来数十亿美元的经济收益。

民主党人对这位共和党总统的批评更加肆无忌惮。

“伊朗现在能够出口石油和天然气,赚取更多数十亿美元,还能获得其冻结资产的使用权,”加利福尼亚州联邦参议员、民主党人亚当·希夫表示,“而伊朗为此付出了什么?一无所获。”

“这对伊朗来说是一笔绝佳的协议,”他对福克斯新闻数字频道说道,“我完全无法理解这种思路。”

核专家警告伊朗的铀“权利”是谎言,称特朗普坚持立场是正确的

2026年2月21日,加利福尼亚州参议员亚当·希夫在旧金山举行的加州民主党大会上发表讲话。(曼努埃尔·奥贝戈佐/路透社)

多名议员还质疑,该协议是否能在伊朗核计划问题上获得有意义的让步,而这一问题正是引发冲突的根源。

“我认为在核武器开发问题上,措辞都一样,”伊利诺伊州联邦参议员、民主党人迪克·德宾说道,“我们当初是为了什么而开战?”

“你在开玩笑吗?”当被问及该协议的质量时,马萨诸塞州联邦参议员、民主党人伊丽莎白·沃伦反驳道,“听着,所有迹象都表明,伊朗现在比这场战争开始前的处境更好。”

其他议员质疑,在经历了数月的战争之后,该协议是否能被合理地视为美国的一场胜利。

“我最担心的是,我不知道任何人,哪怕是像唐纳德·特朗普这样优秀的推销员,怎么能把这说成是美国的胜利,”弗吉尼亚州联邦参议员、民主党人马克·华纳说道。

并非所有议员都反对该协议。

肯塔基州联邦参议员、共和党人兰德·保罗表达了简短但支持的立场,他说:“和平总比战争好。”

特朗普再次称协议即将达成,随后证实与伊朗达成最后一刻协议,但细节仍保密

2026年3月18日,肯塔基州联邦参议员、共和党人兰德·保罗在华盛顿特区参议院国土安全委员会为参议员马克韦·马林斯确认国土安全部部长职位的听证会上发表开场陈述。(安娜·蒙尼梅耶/盖蒂图片社)

多名议员还将该协议与奥巴马时代的《联合全面行动计划》(JCPOA),即2015年核协议进行了比较,特朗普在第一任期内退出了该协议。

“向我公开的信息表明,我们做出的让步比《联合全面行动计划》多得多,换来的却比那时少得多,”弗吉尼亚州联邦参议员、民主党人蒂姆·凯恩说道。

沃伦认为,这场冲突的结果实际上让政府回到了特朗普曾经拒绝过的类似协议。

点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

“还记得现在的整个核协议吗?”沃伦问道,“不比我们2015年巴拉克·奥巴马达成协议时的情况好多少。”

“而在经历了这一切之后,唐纳德·特朗普把我们带到了这一步?”她继续说道,“太丢人了。”

汉娜是福克斯新闻数字频道的制作助理。

WATCH: Cruz sounds alarm on Trump Iran deal, warns against handing billions to ‘theocratic lunatics’

June 18, 2026 11:58am EDT / Fox News

Sen. Adam Schiff said Iran is giving up ‘nothing’ in exchange for sanctions relief and access to frozen funds

By Hannah Brennan Fox News

WATCH: Senators react to Trump’s Iran peace deal: ‘What an embarrassment’

Republican and Democratic senators react to President Donald Trump’s Iran peace deal, with lawmakers from both parties criticizing the agreement and raising concerns about its potential impact. (Credit: Nicholas Ballasy for Fox News Digital)

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/5303b0c9-1212-4220-917f-181173491513

Listen to this article

3 min

A bipartisan group of lawmakers voiced strong skepticism about President Donald Trump’s newly signed Iran peace deal, arguing the agreement leaves Iran in a stronger position while questioning whether the United States secured enough in return.

Prior to Trump signing the memorandum of understanding (MOU) on Thursday, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, offered some of the sharpest criticism among lawmakers, arguing the deal rewards “theocratic lunatics” of a hostile regime.

“Giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is not a good idea,” Cruz told Fox News Digital. “I think the president, unfortunately, is receiving bad advice on this deal.”

Other Republicans stormed off when confronted about the new terms.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION UNVEILS SWEEPING TERMS OF PROPOSED IRAN AGREEMENT

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, criticized the Trump administration’s Iran memorandum of understanding, arguing the agreement would provide billions of dollars in economic benefits to Tehran while several lawmakers questioned what the United States would gain in return.(Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Alex Wong/Getty Images)

The MOU provides immediate sanctions relief, including waivers on Iranian oil exports and access to frozen funds, while establishing a framework for more than $300 billion in reconstruction and economic development. It also sets a 60-day negotiation period aimed at reaching a final accord on Iran’s nuclear program — provisions critics like Cruz argue would provide Tehran with billions in economic benefits.

Democrats were even more brazen in their criticism of the Republican president.

“Iran is now going to be able to export their oil and gas, rake in billions more. It’s going to get access to its frozen assets,” Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said. “And what is Iran giving up for this? Nothing.”

“This is a great deal for Iran,” he told Fox News Digital. “I just don’t understand the thinking at all.”

NUCLEAR EXPERTS WARN IRAN’S URANIUM ‘RIGHT’ IS A MYTH, SAY TRUMP IS RIGHT TO HOLD FIRM

Senator Adam Schiff speaks during the California Democratic Convention in San Francisco, Calif., on Feb. 21, 2026.(Manuel Orbegozo/Reuters)

Several lawmakers also questioned whether the agreement secures meaningful concessions on Iran’s nuclear program, the issue that drove the conflict in the first place.

“I think when it comes to the development of nuclear weapons, the language is the same,” Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said. “We went to war for what?”

“Are you kidding?” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., shot-back when asked about the quality of the deal. “Look, everything about this says that Iran is better off now than it was before this war started.”

Other lawmakers questioned whether the agreement could credibly be viewed as a win for the U.S. after months of war.

“My biggest fear is I don’t know how anyone, even as good a salesman as Donald Trump can be, can sell this as a win for the United States,” Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., said.

Not every lawmaker opposed the agreement.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., shared a brief but supportive stance, saying: “Peace is better than war.”

TRUMP AGAIN SAYS DEAL IS CLOSE, THEN CONFIRMS A LAST-MINUTE AGREEMENT WITH IRAN, BUT DETAILS STILL SECRET

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., delivers an opening statement during a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing for Sen. Markwayne Mullin’s confirmation as DHS secretary in Washington, D.C., on March 18, 2026.(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Several lawmakers also compared the agreement to the Obama-era Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the 2015 nuclear deal Trump withdrew from during his first term.

“The public reporting to me suggests we’re giving up an awful lot more to get a lot less than the JCPOA,” Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., said.

Warren argued the outcome of the conflict had effectively brought the administration back to a deal similar to the one Trump once rejected.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“Remember this whole nuclear deal now?” Warren asked. “No better than what we had back in 2015, back when Barack Obama cut the deal.

“And that’s where Donald Trump winds us up after all of this?” she continued. “What an embarrassment.”

Hannah is a Production Assistant for Fox News Digital.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注