18名众议院共和党议员违抗特朗普 通过乌克兰援助法案,或将面临否决战


2026年6月4日 美国东部时间晚上8:28 / 福克斯新闻频道

18名众议院共和党议员违抗特朗普 通过乌克兰援助法案,或将面临否决战

这份由民主党起草的法案目前在参议院面临艰难闯关,同时遭到共和党领导层和白宫的反对

作者:亚当·帕克 福克斯新闻

NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章播报!

由共和党掌控的众议院周四通过了一项全面的安全法案,为乌克兰提供新的军事援助并对俄罗斯实施制裁,此举对反对该法案的特朗普政府发出了尖锐的驳斥。

18名共和党议员跨党派投票支持这份由民主党起草的法案,最终投票结果为226票赞成、195票反对。与共和党议员团一起参加党团会议的无党派议员、来自加利福尼亚州的众议员凯文·凯利也投票支持该法案。与此同时,明尼苏达州民主党众议员伊尔汗·奥马尔是唯一一名投下反对票的民主党议员。

众议院共和党领导层以及绝大多数共和党议员都反对这项旨在加强乌克兰防御能力的法案,目前正值俄罗斯导弹和无人机袭击激增,冲突进入第五年之际。

该法案目前已提交参议院,在那里要通过参议院议程将面临一场艰难的战斗。据福克斯新闻数字频道获取的一份声明显示,白宫表示该法案会破坏唐纳德·特朗普总统结束这场长期冲突的目标,特朗普将否决这项法案。

由共和党掌控的众议院不顾众议院议长、路易斯安那州共和党议员迈克·约翰逊以及白宫的反对,通过了一项乌克兰援助法案。(阿尔·德拉戈/彭博社摄)

记者手记:共和党反叛者违抗特朗普,国会跨多票的控制权持续削弱

“该法案试图束缚总统的手脚,强制要求美国对俄乌战争采取广泛应对措施,同时新增数亿美元未提供资金的授权项目,”白宫文件中部分内容写道。

这项安全法案将重申美国对乌克兰和北约的支持,批准超过15亿美元的新安全援助以及80亿美元的直接贷款,并延长五角大楼为乌克兰采购武器和军事装备的项目。

该法案还将瞄准克里姆林宫的能源利润——这是维持俄罗斯战争努力的核心,以及与受制裁俄罗斯实体有业务往来的组织和公司。

白宫警告称,该法案规定的强制性制裁将“使全球经济陷入混乱”。

但支持该法案的共和党人表示,其通过不应被视为违抗总统。

“特朗普总统一直是支持乌克兰人民的领导人,所以我会投票支持乌克兰人民,延续特朗普政府的支持传统,”南卡罗来纳州议员威尔逊在接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时说道。

当被问及共和党内部的反对声音时,威尔逊说:“普京需要知道,美国人民站在乌克兰勇敢无畏的人民一边。”

白宫警告称,如果《乌克兰支持法案》送达特朗普总统办公桌,他将否决该法案。(摄影师:肖恩·瑟/美联社/彭博社通过盖蒂图片社拍摄)

支持乌克兰的共和党众议员培根宣称:“真正的共和党人都知道,普京的俄罗斯憎恨西方和自由”

尽管如此,几名反对该法案的共和党人表示,他们的反对不应被视为对乌克兰缺乏支持。

“这项法案不是为了帮助乌克兰。这不是为了反抗弗拉基米尔·普京,”佛罗里达州共和党众议员兰迪·法恩说道。“这是因为特朗普 derangement综合征(特朗普妄想症),而特朗普总统正试图让这场冲突落幕。”

共和党议员团中的其他人士也明确反对为乌克兰提供额外的美国援助。

“我反对为乌克兰提供更多资金,”路易斯安那州共和党众议员克莱·希金斯告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。

此次投票成功之前,由纽约州民主党众议员格雷戈里·米克斯发起的这项法案早在2025年初就已提出,但在众议院外交事务委员会搁置了一年多。

但在几名倒戈的共和党议员签署由民主党起草的 discharge请愿书( discharge请愿书,即解除议长对法案的搁置权)后,该法案获得了动力,触发了众议院议长迈克·约翰逊——这位掌控议会议事流程的共和党人——反对的投票。

大多数共和党议员不愿支持通过discharge请愿书提交到议会的法案,这通常被视为破坏共和党领导层并帮助少数党民主党人的举动。

“民主党人在少数党地位时反复像多数党一样执政,本周我们也将如此,”众议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党议员哈基姆·杰弗里斯周二说道。

乌克兰顿涅茨克州克拉马托尔斯克的一栋居民住宅楼在周三的俄罗斯袭击中仍有受损,袭击造成至少三人死亡、四人受伤。(阿尔捷姆·斯捷潘诺夫/乌克兰公共电视台/“乌克兰国家广播公司”股份公司/全球影像乌克兰通过盖蒂图片社拍摄)

一些共和党议员还认为,这项乌克兰相关法案起草拙劣且内容过时。

例如,该法案呼吁北约成员国将国防开支提高至其经济产出的2%,但特朗普在2025年已从盟友那里获得了5%的承诺。

“这项法案实际上让我们倒退,北约国防成员国的开支会因此减少,”宾夕法尼亚州共和党众议员瑞安·麦肯齐说道。

该法案还提议为乌克兰军队的训练和装备提供的资金低于国会去年在年度国防政策法案中批准的数额。

“越来越明显的是,这场战争终将结束,而结束的方式将是通过谈判,”德克萨斯州共和党众议员基思·塞尔在众议院辩论期间说道。“如果你支持这项法案,那么显然你对和平不感兴趣,因为该法案的后果将束缚本届总统的手脚,并可能导致未来的敌对行动蔓延至欧洲。”

但该法案的支持者反驳称,在结束战争的努力陷入停滞之际,乌克兰迫切需要军事援助。

“这是我们的丘吉尔时刻,或是张伯伦时刻,”即将不再寻求连任的培根说道。“天哪,我想选择丘吉尔,众议院也最好选择丘吉尔。”

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6397138895112

The Democrat-authored bill now faces an uphill battle in the Senate and is opposed by GOP leadership and the White House

By Adam Pack, Fox News

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Republican-led House on Thursday passed a sweeping security package providing new military aid to Ukraine and imposing sanctions on Russia, delivering a sharp rebuke to the Trump administration, who opposed the measure.

Eighteen Republicans crossed party lines to support the Democrat-authored legislation in a vote of 226-195. California Rep. Kevin Kiley, an independent who caucuses with Republicans, also supported the legislation. Meanwhile, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., was the lone Democratic lawmaker to vote against the bill.

House GOP leadership and the vast majority of Republicans opposed the legislation aimed at bolstering Ukraine’s defenses amid a surge in Russian missile and drone strikes as the conflict enters its fifth year.

The measure now heads to the Senate, where it faces an uphill battle to clear the chamber. The White House said the legislation would undermine President Donald Trump’s goal of ending the prolonged conflict and that he would veto the measure, according to a statement obtained by Fox News Digital.

The GOP-led House passed a Ukraine aid package over the objections of House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and the White House.(Al Drago/Bloomberg)

REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: GOP REBELS DEFY TRUMP AS CONGRESSIONAL GRIP CONTINUES TO WEAKEN ACROSS MULTIPLE VOTES

“The bill seeks to tie the President’s hands by mandating a wide-ranging U.S. response to the Russia-Ukraine war while adding hundreds of millions in unfunded authorizations,” the White House document reads, in part.

The security package would reaffirm U.S. support for Ukraine and NATO, authorize more than $1.5 billion in new security assistance and $8 billion in direct loans, and extend a Pentagon program that procures weapons and military equipment for Ukraine.

The legislation would also target the Kremlin’s energy profits, which are central to keeping Russia’s war effort going, as well as organizations and companies that do business with sanctioned Russian entities.

The White House warned that the legislation’s mandatory sanctions would “plunge the global economy into chaos.”

But Republicans who supported the measure said its passage should not be viewed as defying the president.

“President Trump has been the leader to support the people of Ukraine, and so I’ll be voting for the people of Ukraine, continuing the Trump tradition of support,” Wilson, a South Carolina lawmaker, told Fox News Digital in an interview.

When asked about GOP opposition, Wilson said, “Putin needs to know that the American people stand with the brave and courageous people of Ukraine.”

The White House warned that President Donald Trump would veto the Ukraine Support Act if it reaches his desk.(Photographer: Shawn Thew/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

PRO-UKRAINE GOP REP. BACON DECLARES ‘REAL REPUBLICANS KNOW THAT PUTIN’S RUSSIA HATES THE WEST AND FREEDOM’

Still, several Republicans who opposed the measure said their opposition should not be viewed as a lack of support for Ukraine.

“This bill is not about helping Ukraine. This is not about standing up to Vladimir Putin,” Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla., said. “This is about engaging in Trump Derangement Syndrome as President Trump tries to bring this conflict in for a landing.”

Others in the GOP conference voiced firm opposition to additional U.S. aid for the country.

“I oppose further funding of Ukraine,” Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., told Fox News Digital.

The successful vote came after the legislation, sponsored by Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., had languished in the House Foreign Affairs Committee for more than a year after being introduced in early 2025.

But the measure gained momentum after a handful of defecting Republicans signed a Democrat-authored discharge petition that triggered a vote over the objections of House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., who controls the floor.

Most Republicans are reluctant to support legislation that comes to the floor via a discharge petition, which is often seen as undermining GOP leadership and aiding Democrats in the minority.

“Democrats have repeatedly governed in the minority as if we were in the majority, and we’re going to do so again this week,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Tuesday.

A residential apartment building in Kramatorsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine, remains damaged after a Russian attack Wednesday that killed at least three people and wounded four others.(Artem Stepanov/Suspilne Ukraine/JSC “UA:PBC”/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)

Some GOP lawmakers also argued the Ukraine measure was poorly drafted and outdated.

For example, the bill calls on NATO countries to increase defense spending to 2% of their economic output, but Trump secured a 5% commitment from allies in 2025.

“This bill literally moves us backwards, and a decrease of NATO defense member spending would be the result,” Rep. Ryan Mackenzie, R-Pa., said.

The legislation also proposes a lower figure for training and equipping Ukraine’s military than what Congress authorized last year in annual defense policy legislation.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“It’s increasingly obvious that this war will end, and when it ends, it will be through negotiation,” Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas, said during debate on the House floor. “If you support this bill, then clearly you are not interested in peace, because the consequences would tie the hands of this president and could lead to future hostilities that would bleed over into Europe.”

But the legislation’s proponents fired back that Ukraine is in desperate need of military aid amid stalled efforts to end the war.

“This is our Churchill moment or our Chamberlain moment,” Bacon, who is not running for reelection, said. “By God, I want to choose Churchill, and this House better choose Churchill.”

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6397138895112

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注