特朗普扩大对古巴制裁范围,将美国企业之外的外国协助方纳入严厉打击范围


2026-06-03 15:39 EDT / 福克斯新闻网

特朗普签署的行政令威胁对在与古巴GAESA企业集团相关行业开展业务的外国公司实施制裁
作者:埃弗拉特·拉赫特 福克斯新闻网
发布于2026年6月3日 美国东部时间下午3:39

前财政部制裁官员马克斯·迈兹利什表示,特朗普政府正将“前所未有的”施压范围扩大到古巴本土之外,威胁对与这个岛国军事关联的经济帝国有往来的外国银行和公司实施制裁。

NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/cf8aab6a-aaa4-4981-8d9d-39d959b295a9

收听本文
6分钟

特朗普政府正在推出被专家称为数十年来美国对古巴制裁最重大的一次扩围举措。

本届政府正在尝试实施支持者所称的首个针对外国公司的古巴相关次级制裁全面方案,目标不仅是哈瓦那本身,还有继续与这个岛国军事关联的经济帝国开展业务的外国公司和银行。

这项新框架由唐纳德·特朗普总统于5月1日签署的行政令确立,首次将施压范围扩大到美国企业之外,威胁外国公司若继续在与企业管理集团S.A.(简称GAESA)相关的古巴经济关键领域开展业务,将面临制裁风险。

特朗普政府因石油即将耗尽呼吁关闭古巴禁运漏洞

支持者称,此举填补了一项漏洞,该漏洞曾允许外国投资者维持古巴的共产主义政权,而长期存在的美国禁运在很大程度上限制了美国人的相关贸易。

批评者则认为,这些措施可能会加剧古巴本已严峻的人道主义危机,却无法有效削弱古巴政府。

古巴莫隆的示威者试图焚烧共产党总部,此前当局据称未经事先警告就向抗议者开枪。(福克斯新闻数字频道获取)

“本月初,特朗普政府首次将美国制裁的适用范围从仅禁止美国公司和美国个人与古巴岛开展贸易,扩展到第三方国家和协助方,”曾任职于美国财政部、现为国防民主基金会研究员的马克斯·迈兹利什在接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时表示。
“这是有史以来首次以真正前所未有的方式,本届政府现在将同样的逻辑应用于古巴,”他说。

制裁的重点主要是GAESA,这是一家庞大的军事关联企业集团,分析人士估计其控制着古巴40%至70%的经济,包括旅游业、矿业、零售业、港口和金融服务。

迈兹利什与康纳·法伊弗共同撰写的国防民主基金会近期报告指出,在古巴开展业务的外国公司实际上正在帮助维持该政权的军事和政治领导层。

[特朗普宣布古巴问题进入国家紧急状态,威胁对向共产主义政权供应石油的国家征收关税]

2023年4月12日,古巴哈瓦那的一块广告牌上展示了已故古巴总统菲德尔·卡斯特罗、前古巴总统劳尔·卡斯特罗以及古巴总统、共产党第一书记米格尔·迪亚斯-卡内尔的画像。(亚历山大·梅内吉尼/路透社)

美国国务院根据新授权于5月对GAESA及其多家关联实体实施了制裁,为在6月5日的过渡期截止日后继续与它们开展业务的外国公司和金融机构面临潜在处罚打开了大门。

迈兹利什认为,此前的制裁制度之所以失败,是因为它们仅孤立了美国企业,却允许外国机构继续为古巴国家提供资金。
“例如,有很多西班牙公司在古巴与GAESA合作的豪华酒店、别墅物业投资了数百万美元,所有这些资金都在资助这个军事企业,却牺牲了古巴人民的利益,”他说。

他还指出了加拿大在古巴镍和钴行业的参与,称外国投资为该政权带来了“巨额资金”。

“很多人认为多年来的美国禁运实际上是古巴岛上诸多问题的罪魁祸首,但他们没有考虑到这样一个事实:这次新纳入制裁名单的GAESA多年来坐拥估计200亿美元的资产和现金,却剥夺了古巴人民的资源,”迈兹利什告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。

但该政策的批评者警告称,经济影响可能最沉重地落在普通古巴人身上。

美国大学长期研究古巴问题的专家威廉·利奥格兰德表示,5月1日的措施代表了一次重大升级,因为它们专门针对外国企业,而非仅仅针对美国实体。

利奥格兰德称,新制裁代表了一次重大升级,因为它们的适用范围超出了美国人,旨在通过威胁实施制裁来阻止外国公司与GAESA开展业务。

利奥格兰德承认,这些措施可能会剥夺古巴政府的收入,但辩称更广泛的民众可能会遭受最严重的影响。

[古巴 entire电网崩溃,全岛陷入停电]

2024年3月18日,古巴阿尔特米萨省包塔市的一条黑暗街道上,一名女子带着儿子向车辆示意。(亚米尔·拉赫/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)

“这可能会剥夺古巴政府的资金,但影响将主要落在普通公民身上,因为这意味着政府用于进口食品、药品和燃料的资源更少了,”他说。

这场辩论正值古巴面临多年来最严重的经济和人道主义危机之际。

世界粮食计划署称,由于燃料短缺、通货膨胀和进口商品获取渠道减少,粮食不安全状况正在恶化,而联合国官员警告称,电力短缺和停电正在扰乱全岛的医院、疫苗接种计划和食品分销网络。

利奥格兰德还警告称,更严厉的制裁可能会引发另一场移民危机。

[尼加拉瓜封锁古巴移民前往美国的通道]

古巴民众走上街头抗议食品和电力短缺。(路透社)

“另一个意想不到的后果是,通过让古巴的生活条件更加绝望,更严厉的制裁可能会引发类似于1980年或1994年的大规模移民潮,”利奥格兰德说。

一位不愿透露姓名的美国官员驳斥了美国制裁应对古巴人道主义危机负责的说法。
“古巴人民的苦难不是由美国禁运造成的,而是由古巴独裁政权失败的共产主义政策和侵犯人权行为造成的,”该官员告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“禁运并不禁止古巴进入世界市场或与第三国开展贸易。”

该官员补充称,美国法律明确允许向古巴出口食品、药品和医疗设备,并指责该政权“将数十亿美元隐藏在海外银行账户中,而非投资于电力、基础设施和人民的日常需求”。

这场辩论反映了围绕美国对伊朗和委内瑞拉等国制裁的长期争议,支持者认为经济压力是削弱专制政府的工具,而批评者则认为政权往往能够存活下来,平民却要承担经济损失。

[点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP]

迈兹利什认为,不应仅以制裁是否立即推翻政府来评判其效果。
“问题不在于禁运太过严厉,”他说。“而是它不够严厉。”

福克斯新闻数字频道已联系古巴驻华盛顿大使馆置评,但截至发稿未收到回复。

埃弗拉特·拉赫特是福克斯新闻数字频道负责国际事务和联合国事务的记者。在X平台@efratlachter关注她。新闻线索可发送至efrat.lachter@fox.com。

Trump expands Cuba sanctions beyond US companies in major crackdown on foreign enablers

2026-06-03 15:39 EDT / Fox News

A Trump executive order threatens sanctions exposure for foreign firms operating in sectors linked to Cuba’s GAESA conglomerate

By Efrat Lachter Fox News

Published June 3, 2026 3:39pm EDT

Former Treasury sanctions official Max Meizlish says the Trump administration is expanding “unprecedented” pressure beyond Cuba itself by threatening foreign banks and companies tied to the island’s military-linked economic empire.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/cf8aab6a-aaa4-4981-8d9d-39d959b295a9

Listen to this article

6 min

The Trump administration is rolling out what experts describe as the most significant expansion of U.S. sanctions on Cuba in decades.

The administration is attempting what supporters say is the first broad application of Cuba-related secondary sanctions against foreign firms, aiming not only at Havana itself but also at foreign companies and banks that continue doing business with the island’s military-linked economic empire.

The new framework, established under an executive order signed by President Donald Trump May 1, applies pressure beyond U.S. companies for the first time, threatening foreign firms with sanctions exposure if they continue operating in key sectors of the Cuban economy linked to Grupo de Administración Empresarial S.A., or GAESA.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PRESSED TO CLOSE CUBA EMBARGO LOOPHOLE AS OIL SET TO RUN OUT WITHIN DAYS

Supporters say the move closes a loophole that allowed foreign investors to sustain Cuba’s communist regime while the longstanding U.S. embargo largely restricted Americans.

Critics argue the measures risk worsening an already severe humanitarian crisis on the island without meaningfully weakening the government.

Demonstrators attemp to burn the Communist Party headquarters in Morón, Cuba, after authorities allegedly opened fire on protesters without prior warning.(Obtained by Fox News Digital)

“At the top of the month, what the Trump administration did was for the first time extend the application of U.S. sanctions from just prohibiting trade between U.S. firms and U.S. persons and the Cuban island to third-party countries and enablers,” Max Meizlish, a former Treasury Department official now serving as a research fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital in an interview.

“For the first time ever in a truly unprecedented fashion, that’s the same logic that the administration is now applying to Cuba,” he said.

The sanctions focus heavily on GAESA, a sprawling military-linked conglomerate that analysts estimate controls between 40% and 70% of Cuba’s economy, including tourism, mining, retail, ports and financial services.

A recent Foundation for Defense of Democracies report authored by Meizlish and Connor Pfeiffer argued that foreign companies doing business in Cuba are effectively helping sustain the regime’s military and political leadership.

[TRUMP DECLARES NATIONAL EMERGENCY OVER CUBA, THREATENS TARIFFS ON NATIONS THAT SUPPLY OIL TO COMMUNIST REGIME]

Images of late Cuban President Fidel Castro, Cuba’s former President Raul Castro and Cuba’s President and First Secretary of the Communist Party Miguel Diaz-Canel are displayed in a billboard in Havana, Cuba, April 12, 2023.(Alexandre Meneghini/Reuters)

The State Department sanctioned GAESA and several affiliated entities in May under the new authorities, opening the door for potential penalties against foreign companies and financial institutions that continue dealings with them after a June 5 wind-down deadline.

Meizlish argued previous sanctions regimes failed because they isolated American companies while allowing foreign actors to continue financing the Cuban state.

“There’s a lot of Spanish firms, for instance, that have invested millions of dollars in luxury hotel properties, villa properties in Cuba that partner with GAESA, all funding this military enterprise at the expense of the Cuban people,” he said.

He also pointed to Canadian involvement in Cuba’s nickel and cobalt sectors, saying foreign investment has generated “huge amounts of money for the regime.”

“A lot of people think about the U.S. embargo over the years is actually being responsible for a lot of the problems on the Cuban island, but they don’t give consideration to the fact that GAESA, this newly sanctioned entity, has been sitting on an estimated $20 billion in assets and cash over the year while depriving the people of Cuba,” Meizlish told Fox News Digital.

But critics of the policy warn the economic fallout could land hardest on ordinary Cubans.

William LeoGrande, a longtime Cuba expert at American University, said the May 1 measures represent a major escalation because they specifically target foreign businesses rather than just Americans.

LeoGrande said the new sanctions represent a major escalation because they extend beyond Americans and aim to deter foreign companies from doing business with GAESA by threatening sanctions exposure.

LeoGrande acknowledged the measures could deprive the Cuban government of revenue but argued the broader population is likely to suffer most.

[CUBA’S ENTIRE ELECTRICAL GRID COLLAPSES, LEAVING WHOLE ISLAND WITHOUT POWER]

A woman with her son signals a car on a dark street during a blackout in Bauta municipality, Artemisa province, Cuba, on March 18, 2024.(YAMIL LAGE/AFP via Getty Images)

“This would potentially deprive the Cuban government of funds, but the impact will fall mainly on ordinary citizens because it means the government has fewer resources to import food, medicine and fuel,” he said.

The debate comes as Cuba faces its deepest economic and humanitarian crisis in years.

The World Food Programme says food insecurity is worsening amid fuel shortages, inflation and declining access to imported goods, while U.N. officials have warned that electricity shortages and blackouts are disrupting hospitals, vaccination programs and food distribution networks across the island.

LeoGrande also warned tougher sanctions could contribute to another migration crisis.

[NICARAGUA BLOCKS PATHWAY USED BY CUBAN MIGRANTS TO REACH THE US]

Protests take to the streets in Cuba over food, electricity shortages.(Reuters)

“Another unintended effect is that by making living conditions in Cuba even more desperate, tougher sanctions could trigger a mass migration like we saw in 1980 or 1994,” LeoGrande said.

On background, a U.S. official rejected arguments that American sanctions are responsible for Cuba’s humanitarian crisis.

“The suffering of the Cuban people is not caused by the U.S. embargo but by the Cuban dictatorship’s failed Communist policies and human rights violations,” the official told Fox News Digital. “The embargo does not prohibit Cuba’s access to world markets or trade with third countries.”

The official added that U.S. law explicitly permits exports of food, medicine and medical equipment to Cuba and accused the regime of hiding “billions in overseas bank accounts instead of investing in electricity, infrastructure and the daily needs of its people.”

The debate mirrors longstanding arguments surrounding U.S. sanctions on countries like Iran and Venezuela, where supporters view economic pressure as a tool to weaken authoritarian governments while critics argue regimes often survive and civilians absorb the economic damage.

[CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP]

Meizlish argued sanctions should not be judged simply by whether they immediately topple governments.

“The problem isn’t that the embargo went too far,” he said. “It’s that it didn’t go far enough.”

Fox News Digital reached out to the Cuban Embassy in Washington for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication.

Efrat Lachter is a reporter for Fox News Digital covering international affairs and the United Nations. Follow her on X @efratlachter. Stories can be sent to efrat.lachter@fox.com.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注