特朗普推动重划选区计划在阿拉巴马州、南卡罗来纳州遭遇挫折


2026-05-26T18:23:05.638Z / 路透社

法庭裁决对共和党不利,阿拉巴马州保留重要黑人占比的美国国会选区
南卡罗来纳州共和党议员否决新选区地图
该州党内初选已开始投票

5月26日(路透社)——唐纳德·特朗普总统推动共和党领导的州在11月中期选举前绘制对其政党更有利的选举地图的计划周二遭遇双重挫折,南卡罗来纳州和阿拉巴马州重塑美国国会众议院选区的努力受阻。

南卡罗来纳州的几名共和党州参议员打破特朗普所在政党的一贯立场,与民主党议员一道投票否决了一份新地图草案,该草案旨在拆分由黑人民主党议员詹姆斯·克莱伯恩把持的国会选区。克莱伯恩30多年前首次当选该席位。

订阅《每日案卷》新闻简报,将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的清晨资讯之旅。点击此处注册

与此同时,一个由三名联邦法官组成的小组否决了阿拉巴马州共和党人推出的新地图计划。该计划将取消该州两个黑人人口占多数的选区之一,法官裁定州议员在重新划分选区边界时故意歧视黑人选民。

在特朗普的敦促下,美国南部多个州的共和党人赶在4月美国最高法院一项削弱对黑人选民或拉丁裔人口占比高的国会选区保护措施的裁决出台后,匆忙推行新的选区地图。

田纳西州已批准一份新地图,拆分了位于孟菲斯的民主党把持的黑人选民占多数的选区;路易斯安那州则正在推进一项计划,取消该州两个黑人人口占比可观的选区之一。

黑人选民通常支持民主党。

民主党和民权倡导者称共和党此举带有种族歧视色彩。共和党支持者则表示,他们关注的是党派优势,而非种族问题。

当前特朗普的公众支持率低迷,部分原因是不受欢迎的伊朗战争以及由此推高的汽油价格,共和党正试图在中期选举中保住其在美国众议院的微弱多数席位。

南卡罗来纳州地图计划失败

南卡罗来纳州的拟议地图原本打算拆分现年85岁的民主党实权人物克莱伯恩把持的选区,从而让共和党得以包揽该州全部7个国会众议院席位。

周二的投票是该计划第二次在州参议院受阻。本月早些时候,5名共和党议员与民主党议员一道,未能达到推进该计划所需的三分之二多数票。

南卡罗来纳州共和党州长亨利·麦克马斯特此前曾拒绝白宫要求召开特别会议的压力,此次却改变立场,召集议员重新审议该地图草案。

该州党内初选的提前投票已于周二启动。一些共和党参议员表示,一旦选票已经开始投放,他们无法支持修改地图并推迟初选。

“据我所知,立法机构在投票开始后更改选举日期并重划选区,这在历史上没有先例,”参议员理查德·卡什在议会辩论中说道。

卡什指出,截至中午已有数万张选票完成投票。

阿拉巴马州地图被认定非法

在阿拉巴马州,一个由三名法官组成的小组裁定,共和党支持的地图故意歧视黑人选民,不能用于2026年的选举。法院表示,阿拉巴马州必须继续使用现有保留两个黑人人口占比可观选区的地图,而非仅保留一个。

阿拉巴马州共和党官员随即表示,他们将向以保守派为主的美国最高法院提起上诉。

阿拉巴马州共和党州长凯·艾维此前已将因这份有争议的地图重新划分的4个国会众议院席位的党内初选推迟至8月。该地图于2023年首次获得批准。

这份地图拆分了一个黑人人口占比接近50%的选区。白人约占该选区人口的40%,其余人口由亚裔和西班牙裔等其他少数族裔构成。黑人约占阿拉巴马州总人口的四分之一。目前该选区由黑人议员绍马里·菲格尔斯代表。

该法官小组曾在2023年就认定该地图存在歧视行为并予以否决。两周前,最高法院批准了阿拉巴马州取消该禁令的请求,并指示法官们根据4月的一项裁决重新审视他们的结论,该裁决提高了基于种族质疑选举地图的门槛。

但该小组仍得出了相同的结论:该地图蓄意且非法地针对黑人选民。

“最终,我们无法认同让阿拉巴马州选民在2026年选举中使用带有故意基于种族歧视污点的选区划分方案进行投票,”该小组写道。该小组包括两名由特朗普任命的法官和一名由民主党前总统比尔·克林顿任命的法官。

阿拉巴马州两个黑人人口占比可观的选区目前由民主党人把持,共和党控制着该州其余5个选区。

约瑟夫·阿克斯报道;保罗·托马施编辑

Trump’s redistricting push suffers setbacks in Alabama, South Carolina

2026-05-26T18:23:05.638Z / Reuters

Court ruling goes against Republicans in Alabama
Judges preserve significantly Black US House district
Republican South Carolina lawmakers balk at new map
Voting already underway in party primaries in the state

May 26 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump’s push for Republican-led states to draw electoral maps more favorable to his party ahead of November’s midterm elections suffered twin setbacks on ​Tuesday, when efforts in South Carolina and Alabama to reshape U.S. House of Representatives districts were stymied.

In a rare break with Trump from members of his ‌own party, several Republican state senators in South Carolina voted with Democrats to abandon a new map aimed at dismantling the U.S. House district held by congressman James Clyburn, a Black Democrat first elected to the seat more than three decades ago.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Separately, a panel of three federal judges blocked Alabama Republicans from installing a new map that would eliminate one of the state’s two districts with major Black populations, ruling that state lawmakers intentionally ​discriminated against Black voters in reconfiguring the boundaries.

At Trump’s urging, Republicans in several Southern states have rushed to implement new maps following a U.S. Supreme Court decision in April that ​weakened protections for U.S. House districts with significant Black or Latino populations.

Tennessee already has approved a new map that broke up a majority-Black, Democratic-held ⁠district based in Memphis, while Louisiana is advancing a plan to eliminate one of two districts with sizable Black populations in that state.

Black voters typically support Democrats.

Democrats and civil rights advocates ​have called the Republican efforts racially discriminatory. Republican backers have said they are focused on partisan advantage, not race.

Republicans are seeking to retain their narrow U.S. House majority in the midterms at a ​time when Trump is registering low approval ratings in public opinion polls, thanks in part to the unpopular Iran war and the higher gasoline prices it has caused.

SOUTH CAROLINA MAP FAILS

The proposed map in South Carolina would have positioned Republicans to sweep all seven U.S. House districts in the state after taking apart the seat held by Clyburn, 85, a Democratic power broker.

Tuesday’s vote was the second time that the effort stalled in the ​state Senate. Five Republicans joined Democrats earlier in the month to deny the two-thirds majority needed to advance the plan during a regular session of the chamber.

Republican South Carolina Governor Henry ​McMaster, who had previously had rejected White House pressure to call a special session, reversed course and brought lawmakers back to consider the map.

Early voting began in the state on Tuesday in party primaries. Some Republican ‌senators said ⁠they could not support changing the map and postponing the primaries once ballots had already been cast.

“As far as I can tell, there is no historical precedent for a legislature to change the date of an election and redraw the maps once voting has begun,” Senator Richard Cash said during floor debate.

Cash noted that tens of thousands of votes had been recorded by midday.

ALABAMA MAP DEEMED ILLEGAL

In Alabama, a three-judge panel decided that a Republican-backed map intentionally discriminated against Black voters and could not be used for the 2026 elections. Instead, the court said, Alabama must continue to ​use a map that has two districts with ​sizable Black populations, not just one.

Republican officials ⁠in Alabama immediately said they would appeal to the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court.

Republican Alabama Governor Kay Ivey previously postponed until August the party primaries for four U.S. House districts that were redrawn as part of the disputed map, which was first approved in 2023.

The map breaks up a district ​in which Black people comprise just shy of 50% of the population. White people make up about 40% of the district, with other ​minorities including Asian and Hispanic ⁠people filling out the balance. Black people make up about a quarter of Alabama’s population. The district is currently represented by congressman Shomari Figures, who is Black.

The same panel of judges found the map discriminatory in 2023 and blocked it. Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court granted Alabama’s request to lift that block, and directed the judges to reconsider their findings in light of its April decision that ⁠raised the bar ​for challenging electoral maps on the basis of race.

But the panel reached the same conclusion: that the map purposefully ​and unlawfully targeted Black voters.

“Ultimately, we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination,” wrote the panel, which includes two judges appointed ​by Trump and one appointed by Democratic former President Bill Clinton.

Democrats hold Alabama’s two districts with sizeable Black populations. Republicans control the state’s other five districts.

Reporting by Joseph Ax; editing by Paul Thomasch

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注