美国众议院以微弱差距否决限制特朗普伊朗战争权力的提案


2026年5月14日 21:17 UTC / 路透社
作者:帕特里夏·曾格勒

华盛顿,5月14日(路透社)——美国众议院以微弱差距否决了一项由民主党提出的决议案,该决议旨在暂停对伊朗的军事行动,直至国会授权后方可重启,但这项限制唐纳德·特朗普总统军事行动的提案以最接近的差距落败。

众议院就这项战争权力决议案的投票结果为212票对212票,因决议需获得多数赞成方可通过,最终宣告失败。尽管有更多共和党议员支持这项提案,但仍未能扭转局面。

《路透伊朗简报》新闻简报将为您持续提供伊朗战争的最新动态与分析。请点击此处订阅。

特朗普的三名共和党同僚——密歇根州众议员汤姆·巴雷特、宾夕法尼亚州众议员布莱恩·菲茨帕特里克以及肯塔基州众议员托马斯·马西——投票支持了该决议,而一名民主党议员——缅因州众议员贾里德·戈尔登——则投下了反对票。

这是众议院今年第三次就伊朗战争权力决议案进行投票,也是自5月1日特朗普就伊朗战争向国会提交报告的60天期限到期后的首次投票。特朗普当时宣称,停火协议已“终止”针对伊朗的敌对行动。

参议院此前已有七次相关投票均以失败告终。

此类投票的差距正不断缩小,特朗普所在的共和党在参众两院都仅拥有微弱多数优势。众议院上一次战争权力决议案投票于4月16日进行,当时以213票对214票落败,另有一名议员投了“弃权”票。

在那次投票中,仅有一名共和党议员支持该决议。

参议院的投票差距也在持续缩小。本周三,一项战争权力决议案以50票对49票被否决,三名共和党议员与除一人外的所有民主党议员均投票推动该议案通过。

民主党援引宪法权限

2026年5月14日,美国华盛顿特区,一名行人走过美国国会大厦圆形大厅内的美国国旗。路透社/凯莉·库珀

民主党一直呼吁特朗普就伊朗冲突中的军事行动向国会寻求授权,指出美国宪法规定只有立法机构,而非总统,有权宣战。

他们警告称,特朗普可能已将美国拖入一场长期冲突,却未制定明确战略,并谴责自2月28日美以联合空袭伊朗以来,汽油、食品及其他商品价格上涨。

在11月将决定共和党是否继续掌控国会的中期选举前夕,民主党已将物价可负担性作为其经济政策的核心议题。

受战争爆发以来商品和服务成本飙升推动,美国4月生产者价格指数出现四年以来最大涨幅。

“是时候让总统向我们寻求授权了,我也认为,是时候结束这场战争了,”众议院外交事务委员会最高民主党议员格雷戈里·米克斯在众议院辩论中说道。

白宫援引总司令权力

共和党人与白宫方面表示,特朗普的行动合法,且符合其作为总司令在国家面临迫在眉睫的威胁时下令开展有限军事行动以保护美国的权利。

一些国会共和党议员指责民主党仅出于党派反对特朗普的目的才提出战争权力决议案。

“这完全是作秀,”众议院外交事务委员会主席、佛罗里达州众议员布莱恩·马斯特在辩论中说道。他指责民主党通过战争权力决议案,为伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队传递了希望。

帕特里夏·曾格勒在华盛顿报道;唐·达夫伊与马修·刘易斯编辑

本社报道准则:路透社信托原则

US House narrowly rejects bid to rein in Trump Iran war powers

May 14, 2026 9:17 PM UTC / Reuters

By Patricia Zengerle

WASHINGTON, May 14 (Reuters) – The U.S. House of Representatives narrowly defeated a Democratic-led resolution aiming to stop the Iran war until hostilities are ‌authorized by Congress, but the effort to rein in President Donald Trump’s military campaign failed by the closest possible margin.

The House voted 212 to 212 on the war powers resolution, meaning it failed because it needed a majority to pass, despite more Republicans backing the effort.

The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

Three of Trump’s fellow Republicans – ​Tom Barrett of Michigan, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Thomas Massie of Kentucky – backed the resolution, and one Democrat – ​Jared Golden of Maine – opposed it.

It was the third House vote this year on an Iran war ⁠powers resolution, and the first since the conflict hit a 60-day deadline on May 1 for Trump to come to Congress ​about the war. Trump declared then that a ceasefire had “terminated” hostilities against Iran.

There also have been seven failed votes in the Senate.

The ​votes have been getting tighter, with Trump’s fellow Republicans holding just a slim majority in both chambers. The last House war powers resolution failed on April 16 by 213-214, with one member voting “present.”

In that vote, just one Republican supported the resolution.

They also have been getting more narrow in the Senate, ​where a war powers resolution was blocked by 50-49 on Wednesday as three Republicans joined every Democrat except one in voting to ​advance the measure.

DEMOCRATS CITE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

A person walks in front of an American flag in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 14, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper

Democrats have called on Trump to come to Congress for authorization to use military force in the Iran conflict, ‌noting that ⁠the U.S. Constitution says only the legislature, not the president, can declare war.

They warned that Trump may have pulled the country into a long conflict without setting out a clear strategy and railed against higher prices for gasoline, food and other products since the joint U.S.-Israeli air strikes on Iran on February 28.

Democrats have made affordability a central theme of their economic message ahead of midterm ​elections in November that will decide ​whether Republicans keep control of ⁠Congress.

U.S. producer prices posted their biggest increase in four years in April, boosted by soaring costs for goods and services since the war began.

“It is time for the president to come to us, ​and it is time for us, I believe, to end this war,” Representative Gregory Meeks, the ​top Democrat on ⁠the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said in House debate.

WHITE HOUSE CITES COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF POWERS

Republicans – and the White House – say Trump’s actions are legal and within his rights as commander-in-chief to protect the U.S. by ordering limited military operations when the country faces an imminent threat.

Some congressional ⁠Republicans have ​accused Democrats of filing war powers resolutions only because of their partisan opposition ​to Trump.

“It is 100% about theatrics,” Representative Brian Mast of Florida, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, said during debate. He accused Democrats of giving hope to ​Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps by filing war powers resolutions.

Reporting by Patricia Zengerle in Washington; Editing by Don Durfee and Matthew Lewis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注