内塔尼亚胡称以色列将起诉《纽约时报》


2026年5月14日 / 美国东部时间下午4:43 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

作者:格雷厄姆·凯茨 记者
格雷厄姆·凯茨是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻数字部门负责刑事司法、隐私问题和信息安全的调查记者。可通过KatesG@cbsnews.com或grahamkates@protonmail.com联系格雷厄姆
查看完整个人简介

以色列总理本杰明·内塔尼亚胡的政府计划提起诽谤诉讼,起诉《纽约时报》,以回应该报一篇指称针对巴勒斯坦囚犯存在普遍性性虐待的专栏文章。

这篇由记者尼古拉斯·克里斯托夫撰写的专栏文章,援引了14名男女的采访,“他们称自己遭到以色列定居者或安全部队成员的性侵犯”,但文章也提到克里斯托夫无法核实部分虐待指控。

以色列官员谴责《纽约时报》刊发这篇报道。内塔尼亚胡的办公室称其是“有史以来针对以色列国发布的最令人发指、最扭曲的谎言之一”。该办公室在周四的一份声明中表示,内塔尼亚胡和外交部长吉德翁·萨尔“已指示对《纽约时报》提起诽谤诉讼”。

内塔尼亚胡在X平台上发文称,他的法律顾问将“考虑对《纽约时报》和尼古拉斯·克里斯托夫采取最严厉的法律行动”。

《纽约时报》周三晚间为克里斯托夫的文章辩护,称其是“一篇经过深入报道的观点新闻作品”。

“他采访的14名男女的陈述,只要有可能,都已与其他证人以及受害者倾诉过的对象——包括家人和律师——进行了核实,”《纽约时报》发言人查理·施塔特兰德勒说道。“文章细节经过了 extensive 事实核查,相关陈述还与新闻报道、人权组织的独立研究、调查结果进行了交叉比对,其中一起案件还参考了联合国证词。在报道和事实核查的整个过程中,我们还就文章中的主张咨询了独立专家。”

目前尚不清楚诉讼将在美国还是以色列提起,也不清楚原告方将是谁。

佛蒙特法学院与研究生院前院长、第一修正案学者罗德尼·斯莫拉表示,在美国,政府本身无法提起诽谤诉讼。斯莫拉称,如果内塔尼亚胡或其他政府官员提起诉讼,他们很可能会面临重重困难。

“我认为归根结底,法院会认为这篇(文章)没有足够针对性地指向内塔尼亚胡,允许他提起诉讼,简直危险地接近于允许政府本身提起诉讼,”斯莫拉说道。

美国公民自由联盟前主席纳丁·斯特罗森表示,《纽约时报》还可以援引另一起标志性案件。在《纽约时报诉沙利文案》中,最高法院限制了公职人员提起诽谤诉讼的权利。

斯特罗森称,无论原告是内塔尼亚胡还是其他人,都必须证明“存在故意或鲁莽的虚假陈述,即他们知道或有充分理由知道所述内容为虚假”。

“这不能是观点、分析或视角问题,必须是客观可证伪的,”斯特罗森说道。

耶鲁大学法学院教授杰德·鲁本菲尔德也提到了沙利文案,他表示:“我认为这场诉讼几乎没有胜诉的可能。”

“如果你在批评政府时不点名具体个人,也就是不指出是谁被指应对所谓的不当行为或罪行负责……那么你就是在行使自己的第一修正案权利,”鲁本菲尔德说道。

美国的公众人物曾因认为不公平或诽谤性的新闻报道而提起数百万美元的诉讼,但在庭审中,他们必须证明记者或出版商存在实际恶意——即明知陈述为虚假,或对事实漠不关心。

近年来,特朗普总统曾利用对报道不满提起的诉讼作为筹码,从包括哥伦比亚广播公司新闻在内的新闻机构母公司处获得数百万美元的庭前和解金。特朗普曾就2024年《60分钟》节目对前副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯的采访起诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻。该媒体在诉讼提起后不久就称其“完全毫无依据”。特朗普与哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的母公司派拉蒙最终于2025年达成1600万美元的和解。

1983年,以色列时任国防部长阿里尔·沙龙就一篇关于黎巴嫩大屠杀的文章起诉《时代》杂志。该案进入庭审阶段,联邦陪审团认定相关报道失实,但认定杂志在刊发该报道时不存在实际恶意。

斯莫拉表示,沙龙——数十年后将担任总理——拥有诉讼资格,因为他声称具有诽谤性的报道是专门针对他的。他指出,一小群人即使在报道中未被点名,只要他们认为自己被指与所谓的诽谤行为有关,也拥有法律诉讼资格。

克里斯托夫的专栏文章提到了加沙一名记者的指控,称其被剥光衣服,被一只狗猥亵,以色列警卫在一旁嘲笑。克里斯托夫写道,“巴勒斯坦囚犯和人权监测者还提及了警犬被训练来强奸囚犯的报道”。

斯莫拉表示,如果个别警犬训导员提起诉讼,他们“或许”能成为合格的原告。

“拥有这类专业知识且承担该任务的人数极少,”斯莫拉说道。

不过,斯特罗森表示,即使是这类案件,根据沙利文案确立的标准,胜诉的可能性也微乎其微,因为专栏文章中并未点名具体个人。

“在我看来,这将是一场颇具想象力的诉讼尝试,”斯特罗森说道。

Netanyahu says Israel will sue The New York Times

May 14, 2026 / 4:43 PM EDT / CBS News

By Graham Kates Reporter
Graham Kates is an investigative reporter covering criminal justice, privacy issues and information security for CBS News Digital. Contact Graham at KatesG@cbsnews.com or grahamkates@protonmail.com
Read Full Bio

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government plans to file a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times in response to an opinion column alleging widespread sexual abuse targeting Palestinian prisoners.

The column, by journalist Nicholas Kristof, cites interviews with 14 men and women “who said they had been sexually assaulted by Israeli settlers or members of the security forces,” but notes Kristoff was unable to corroborate some accounts of abuse.

Israeli officials condemned the Times for publishing the report. Netanyahu’s office called it “one of the most hideous and distorted lies ever published against the State of Israel.” In a statement Thursday, the office said Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar “have instructed the initiation of a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times.”

Netanyahu posted on X that his legal advisers will “consider the harshest legal action against The New York Times and Nicholas Kristof.”

The Times on Wednesday night defended Kristof’s piece, calling it a “deeply reported piece of opinion journalism.”

“The accounts of the 14 men and women he interviewed were corroborated with other witnesses, whenever possible, and with people the victims confided in — that includes family members and lawyers,” said Charlie Stadtlander, a spokesperson for the Times. “Details were extensively fact-checked, with accounts further cross-referenced with news reporting, independent research from human-rights groups, surveys and in one case, with U.N. testimony. Independent experts were consulted on the assertions in the piece throughout reporting and fact-checking.”

It is unclear if litigation will be filed in the United States or Israel, or who the plaintiffs will be.

A government itself cannot sue for defamation in the United States, according to Rodney Smolla, a First Amendment scholar and former president of the Vermont Law and Graduate School. If Netanyahu or another government official were to bring the suit, Smolla said they’d likely have a tough hill to climb.

“I think at the end of the day, courts would say this [article] is insufficiently targeting Netanyahu, and to allow him to sue is just too perilously close to allowing a suit by the government itself,” Smolla said.

The New York Times can also count on a different landmark case in which it was involved. In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court limited the ability of public officials to sue for defamation, according to Nadine Strossen, a former president of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Strossen said the plaintiff, whether Netanyahu or someone else, would have to show “that there was intentional or reckless falsity, that they knew or had great reason to know that what was being said was false.”

“It can’t be a matter of opinion or of analysis or of perspective. It has to be objectively falsifiable,” Strossen said.

Yale Law professor Jed Rubenfeld also noted the Sullivan case, saying “I think there is probably zero chance of the suit succeeding.”

“If you write your criticism of a government impersonally without naming particular individuals, who you’re saying are responsible for whatever the misconduct or crimes are….then you’re within your First Amendment rights,” Rubenfeld said.

Public figures in the U.S. have sued for millions over news coverage they considered unfair or defamatory, but at trial they’re required to show that the reporter or publisher acted with actual malice — the knowledge that statements were false, or reckless disregard for the truth.

President Trump has in recent years wielded lawsuits over coverage he hasn’t liked as leverage to extract millions in pretrial settlements from the parent companies of news outlets, including CBS News. Mr. Trump sued CBS News over a 2024 “60 Minutes” interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. The outlet said the lawsuit was “completely without merit” shortly after it was filed. Mr. Trump and CBS News’ parent company, Paramount, settled in 2025 for $16 million.

In 1983, Israel’s then-Minister of Defense Ariel Sharon sued Time Magazine over an article about a massacre in Lebanon. That case went to trial, and a federal jury found the reporting in question to be false, but concluded the magazine did not act with actual malice in publishing the story.

Smolla said Sharon — who decades later would serve as prime minister — had standing because the reporting that he claimed was defamatory was about him specifically. He noted that members of a small group can have legal standing — even when unnamed in the reporting — if they believe they’re implicated in the alleged defamation.

Kristof’s column includes a claim by a journalist from Gaza that he was stripped naked and mounted by a dog as Israeli guards laughed. Kristof wrote that “the Palestinian prisoners and human rights monitors have also cited reports of police dogs being coached to rape prisoners.”

Smolla said if individual police dog trainers brought claims they “might” be viable plaintiffs.

“There are only a small number of people with that expertise who have that assignment,” Smolla said.

Still, Strossen said even a case like that would have little chance under the Sullivan standard, since individuals were not named in the column.

“It seems to me that would be an imaginative effort,” Strossen said.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注