美联储哈马克:不再适宜释放降息倾向


2026-05-01 12:01:44 UTC / 路透社

作者:迈克尔·S·德比
2026年5月1日 美国东部时间下午12:01 更新于4小时前

image 2025年4月24日,美国克利夫兰联邦储备银行行长贝丝·哈马克在纽约接受路透社采访时发言。路透社/迈克·西格尔/档案照片

5月1日(路透社)——克利夫兰联邦储备银行行长贝丝·哈马克周五表示,她本周反对美联储保留宽松政策倾向,原因是经济和通胀前景存在不确定性。
“2026年经济前景的不确定性有所上升,这让货币政策的未来路径更加难以预判,”哈马克在一份声明中说道。

订阅路透社商业新闻简报,每日突发商业新闻直达您的收件箱。[点击此处注册]。

这位官员表示,她周三投票反对美联储维持利率目标区间在3.5%至3.75%不变的政策声明,因为该声明保留了“暂停而非结束宽松周期”的措辞。“鉴于当前的经济前景,我认为这种明确的宽松倾向已不再适宜。”

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

哈马克表示,当前通胀存在上行风险,就业市场则存在下行风险。她补充称,通胀压力“广泛存在”,且“油价上涨带来了额外的通胀压力”。

哈马克的异议发生在一场异常激烈的联邦公开市场委员会投票期间,共有四名官员背离了共识立场。

哈马克以及明尼阿波利斯和达拉斯联邦储备银行的行长们,均投票反对FOMC声明,因其继续保留了暗示美联储下次政策举措将是降息的措辞。另有一位官员——美联储理事斯蒂芬·米兰——投下反对票,支持降息。

迈克尔·S·德比 报道;千住友子 编辑

我们的准则:汤森路透信托原则。

Fed’s Hammack says no longer appropriate to signal rate cut bias

2026-05-01 12:01:44 UTC / Reuters

By Michael S. Derby

May 1, 2026 12:01 PM UTC Updated 4 hours ago

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland President Beth Hammack speaks during an interview with Reuters in New York City, U.S., April 24, 2025. REUTERS/Mike Segar/File Photo

May 1 (Reuters) – Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland President Beth Hammack said Friday she dissented against the ​central bank holding on to an easing bias ‌this week due to uncertainty around the economic and inflation outlooks.

“Uncertainty around the economic outlook has increased in 2026 and ​makes the future path for monetary policy more ​uncertain,” Hammack said in a statement.

Get a daily digest of breaking business news straight to your inbox with the Reuters Business newsletter. Sign up here.

The official said ⁠she voted against the Fed’s policy statement on Wednesday ​that left the interest rate target range unchanged at between ​3.5% and 3.75% because it retained language that pointed to “a pause rather than an end to the easing cycle. I see ​this clear easing bias as no longer appropriate given ​the outlook.”

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Hammack said there are now upside risks to inflation and ‌downside ⁠risks to the job market. She added inflation pressures are “broad based” and “and rising oil prices present an additional source of inflationary pressure.”

Hammack’s dissent took place amid an ​unusually fractious Federal ​Open Market ⁠Committee vote that saw four officials break from the consensus.

Hammack, as well as the ​leaders of the Minneapolis and Dallas Fed ​banks, voted ⁠against the FOMC statement due to its continued inclusion of language that suggested that the next policy move by ⁠the ​central bank would be an ​easing. One official, Fed Governor Stephen Miran, dissented in favor of a ​rate cut.

Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注