美国人真的很反感特朗普的“装饰”尝试


2026-05-01T10:00:51.221Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

分析由

亚伦·布莱克撰写
发布于 2026年5月1日,美国东部时间早上6:00

唐纳德·特朗普

2025年10月22日,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在华盛顿特区白宫椭圆形办公室展示他计划中的宴会厅效果图。
吉姆·沃森/法新社/盖蒂图片社

当后人撰写唐纳德·特朗普的总统任期时,有一个以H开头的词很可能会占据重要篇幅:傲慢(hubris)。

看看他试图将自己的名字和审美风格遍布美国乃至整个政府的做法就知道了。

在持续面临严重经济压力的时期,他突然决定拆除白宫东翼,建造一个气派的大型宴会厅,用于举办与权贵人士的聚会。

尽管他的支持率跌至近期美国历史上罕见的低点,他仍在推进一系列极不寻常的举措,将自己的姓名和形象附着在各类政府建筑和产品上——从肯尼迪中心、美国和平研究所,到国家公园年卡、储蓄账户、处方药网站、新型战列舰、战斗机、富人签证、金币、美元纸币,如今甚至包括护照。

此前,我们几乎没有民调数据可以衡量这些举措在美国民众中的反响。但事实证明,美国人对这些东西的反感程度,可能和表面看起来一样强烈。

关于这个宴会厅的初步民调显示,绝大多数民众对此并不支持。

但即便在当时,你也可以理解为什么有人会觉得这种反对只是暂时的。也许美国人只是对拆除白宫大片区域感到震惊。也许他们会认识到白宫建筑群确实需要更大的活动空间——而特朗普一直表示该项目将由私人出资。

又或许并非如此。

《华盛顿邮报》与美国广播公司新闻联合开展的最新民调发现,如今美国人对该项目的反感程度和去年10月时一模一样。

当时民众以56%反对、28%支持的比例否决了拆除东翼建造新宴会厅的计划,如今这一比例仍为56%反对、28%支持。

2025年11月14日,从重新开放的华盛顿纪念碑上可以看到,施工人员正在继续拆除白宫东翼,为新宴会厅的建设做准备。
安德鲁·莱登/盖蒂图片社

上周末,共和党人似乎从中嗅到了机会。在华盛顿希尔顿酒店举行的白宫记者晚宴遭遇枪击事件后,他们全力投入了支持修建宴会厅的宣传活动。

这个想法——至少最初的宣传口径是——宴会厅将成为此类活动更安全的举办场地(且不提由于种种原因,它实际上根本无法承办这类晚宴)。他们甚至提出将动用4亿美元纳税人资金来建设该项目,而非特朗普一直所说的私人捐款。

《华盛顿邮报》-美国广播公司新闻的民调在枪击事件前后分别进行了一次。尽管民调发现枪击事件后共和党对宴会厅的支持率略有上升,但统计分析显示,“总体而言,民众的看法并未因枪击事件发生显著变化”。

美国人仍以2比1的比例反对修建宴会厅。而对此持有强烈反对意见的民众比例仍为3比1——和枪击事件前一模一样。

民调结果对特朗普另外两项“装饰”计划来说更为糟糕。

特朗普计划在林肯纪念堂和阿灵顿国家公墓之间建造一座250英尺高的凯旋门?

美国人以52%反对、21%支持的比例否决了该计划。

仅有勉强过半的共和党人(51%)支持该计划,而无党派人士的反对比例接近5比1(57%反对、12%支持)。

(和宴会厅一样,该拟建拱门也遭到了监管委员会绝大多数民众的负面反馈。)

而美国财政部计划将特朗普的签名印在纸币上——这是美国历史上首次有在任总统这么做?

2025年10月15日,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在白宫东厅出席宴会厅捐赠者晚宴时,站在拟建的“独立拱门”模型旁发表讲话。
安德鲁·卡瓦列罗-雷登/法新社/盖蒂图片社

美国人对此的反对程度更高,达68%反对、12%支持。

即便共和党人也以两位数的比例反对该举措,42%反对、28%支持。而且除了“让美国再次伟大”(MAGA)阵营的共和党人之外,几乎没有其他支持者。(非MAGA阵营的共和党人反对比例为64%-10%。)

除了这些民调之外,关于特朗普将自己名字遍布各处的举措,几乎没有其他相关数据。

而今年1月,在肯尼迪中心董事会投票决定将特朗普的名字刻在建筑上之后,美国有线电视新闻网的一项民调似乎证实了美国人并不喜欢他对肯尼迪中心和史密森学会等文化机构做出的“改动”。

多达62%的美国人——包括30%的共和党人——表示他在这些改动上“做得太过分了”。

在被问及的八项特朗普举措中,这是“做得太过分”这一评价占比最高的一项。

在政治分析领域,有时看起来特朗普做什么都不会损害他的支持率。毕竟,长期以来,即便他的支持率很低,但韧性十足。

但有时,那些在普通人看来近乎疯狂的行为,在美国民众眼中确实就是如此。

如今,由于伊朗战争和高油价,总统的支持率比以往任何时候都在下滑,很明显,给华盛顿镀金、用更多特朗普元素装饰美国政府,并没有起到任何帮助作用。

Americans really don’t like Trump’s attempts at ornamentation

2026-05-01T10:00:51.221Z / CNN

Analysis by

Aaron Blake

PUBLISHED May 1, 2026, 6:00 AM ET

Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump shows an image of his planned ballroom in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on October 22, 2025.

Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

When the story of Donald Trump’s presidency is written, it’s quite likely that the h-word will figure prominently: hubris.

Look no further than how he’s tried to apply his name — and aesthetic — across America and the government.

During a time of significant ongoing economic stress, he decided to suddenly bulldoze the East Wing of the White House to build a big, fancy ballroom to hold parties with powerful people.

And even as his popularity is sinking to lows rarely seen in recent American history, he’s plowed forward with his highly unorthodox efforts to affix his moniker and likeness to all manner of government buildings and products — ranging from the Kennedy Center, the US Institute of Peace, to National Park passes, savings accounts, a prescription drugs website, a new class of battleships, fighter jets, a visa for rich people, gold coins, dollars bills and, now, to passports.

Up until now, we’ve had little polling by which to gauge how these initiatives landed with the American people. But as it turns out, Americans seem to regard these things as about as ghastly as they might seem.

Initial polling about the ballroom showed it overwhelmingly unpopular.

But even at the time, you could have been forgiven for thinking that was temporary. Maybe it was just jarring for Americans to see the demolition of a large portion of the White House. Maybe they’d see the value of a larger events space — that Trump says is privately funded — for a White House complex that needs it.

Or maybe not.

A new Washington Post-ABC News poll found Americans hate it just as much today as they did back in October.

While they opposed the East Wing demolition and new ballroom project 56%-28% back then, they oppose it today 56%-28%.

Construction crews continue to remove the East Wing of the White House and prepare for the new ballroom construction as seen from the newly reopened Washington Monument on November 14, 2025, in Washington, DC.

Andrew Leyden/Getty Images

Republicans seemed to sense an opportunity on this over the weekend. They jumped headlong into a pro-ballroom campaign after the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at the Washington Hilton hotel.

The idea — at least as it was initially pitched — was that the ballroom would be a more secure venue for such events (never mind that it wouldn’t actually work for this dinner, for a host of reasons). They even decided to float spending $400 million in taxpayer money on it, not the private donations Trump has long said would fund it.

The Post-ABC poll was conducted both before and after the shooting. But although it found a modest rise in GOP support for the ballroom afterward, a statistical analysis showed that, overall, there was “no significant change in opinion associated with the shooting.”

Americans still opposed the ballroom 2-to-1. And those who felt strongly about it still opposed it 3-to-1 – just like before the shooting.

The verdict in the poll was even worse for two other Trump attempts at ornamentation.

Trump’s plan to build a 250-foot triumphal arch between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery?

Americans oppose it 52%-21%.

Only a bare majority of Republicans (51%) support it, and independents oppose it by nearly a 5-to-1 margin (57%-12%).

(The proposed arch, like the ballroom, has also received overwhelmingly negative public feedback to the relevant regulatory commission.)

And the US Treasury’s move to put Trump’s signature on paper money – the first time that’s ever happened with a sitting president?

US President Donald Trump stands near models for a proposed “Independence Arch” as he speaks during a dinner with ballroom donors in the East Room of the White House on October 15, 2025.

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images

Americans oppose that even more, 68%-12%.

Even Republicans lean against that one by double-digits, 42%-28%. And there’s almost no support outside of MAGA Republicans. (Non-MAGA Republicans oppose it 64%-10%.)

Apart from these surveys, there’s not much other data on Trump’s efforts to plaster his name on everything.

And a CNN poll back in January, after the Kennedy Center board voted to put Trump’s name on the building, would seem to confirm Americans don’t like his overall “changes to cultural institutions” like the Kennedy Center and Smithsonian.

Fully 62% of Americans — including 30% of Republicans — said he had “gone too far” with those changes.

Out of eight different Trump initiatives tested, that was the largest “gone too far” number.

In the world of political analysis, it can sometimes seem like nothing Trump does hurts him. After all, his approval rating had proven resilient, if low, for a long time.

But sometimes, the actions that seem kind of crazy to the naked eye do come off that way to the American people.

And now that the president is bleeding support more than ever over the Iran war and high gas prices, it’s clear that gilding DC and adorning the US government with more Trump isn’t helping.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注