2026年5月1日 美国东部时间05:00:13 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
据法律专家表示,美国联邦通讯委员会若要剥夺迪士尼旗下ABC电视台的广播牌照,将面临重重阻碍。
美国联邦通讯委员会于周二下令对ABC的牌照进行提前审查,称正将该电视网纳入其针对迪士尼多元化、公平性与包容性(DEI)实践的持续调查范围。ABC旗下共有八家电视台,包括纽约的WABC-TV和洛杉矶的KABC-TV。
此次加急审查的时机引发了密切关注,因为该命令发布的前一天,特朗普总统呼吁解雇吉米·坎摩尔。此前,坎摩尔在ABC深夜脱口秀节目中的一则玩笑激怒了特朗普及其妻子梅拉尼娅·特朗普。
“这是向迪士尼和ABC施压的手段,目的是改变其节目内容,并迫使他们解雇吉米·坎摩尔,”哥伦比亚大学奈特第一修正案研究所诉讼副主任凯蒂·法洛在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示,她补充道,联邦通讯委员会此次行动的时机“非常可疑”。
曾在联邦通讯委员会任职的投资咨询机构新街研究公司政策分析师布莱尔·莱文在一份报告中称,“此次提前审查令的时机有力证明,启动提前续期程序的动机与总统解雇坎摩尔的呼吁有关,而非ABC的人事行动。”
联邦通讯委员会针对迪士尼的指控
联邦通讯委员会于2025年3月启动针对迪士尼的调查,核心是该公司的DEI政策是否违反联邦反歧视规定。去年,联邦通讯委员会主席布伦丹·卡尔在致时任迪士尼首席执行官罗伯特·艾格的一封信中称,ABC强制执行的“包容性标准”可能在各层级制作环节造成了种族和身份配额制。
该机构还指控ABC采取基于种族的雇佣行为,并将企业奖学金限定发放给特定人口群体。此次针对迪士尼的调查,正值特朗普政府在更广泛范围内取消各雇主、联邦机构、大学及其他组织的DEI举措期间。
迪士尼未回应置评请求。该娱乐公司本周早些时候在发给哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的一份声明中表示,其“长期以来始终严格遵守联邦通讯委员会的规定”。
“我们有信心相关记录能够证明,我们始终符合《通信法案》和第一修正案对牌照持有者的资质要求,并准备通过适当的法律渠道证明这一点,”该公司发言人说道。
联邦通讯委员会也拒绝置评,仅告知哥伦比亚广播公司新闻可参考卡尔周四在新闻发布会上的发言。当被记者问及联邦通讯委员会要求迪士尼为其ABC电视台提交提前牌照续期申请的举动是否与坎摩尔的玩笑有关时,卡尔转而谈及该机构的歧视指控。
“你可以追溯到一年多以前,也就是去年3月,我当时写信给迪士尼称,有证据……或指控表明,迪士尼通过这种恶劣的DEI歧视形式,正如我在信中所言,在公司内部制造了种族隔离空间,”他说道。
卡尔还指出,联邦通讯委员会本周早些时候已下令另一家广播公司Bridge News为其电视台提交提前牌照续期申请。
“我们始终明确表示,我们要求广播公司履行其义务——不仅是公共利益标准,还有[平等就业机会]义务,”卡尔说道,并未提及坎摩尔相关事件。
极少使用的处罚手段
联邦通讯委员会极少拒绝广播牌照续期申请。然而,根据圣克拉拉大学传播学教授查德·拉斐尔的一篇研究论文,1975年,该机构曾在发现某电台母公司负责人指示旗下电台为两名参议院候选人提供有利报道后,吊销了五家电台的牌照。
美国全国广播电视协会周三在一份声明中表示,牌照续期程序必须以“可预测性、公平性和透明度”为基础。
该行业协会称:“联邦通讯委员会‘几乎前所未有的要求一家公司快速重新申请其所有牌照——而非采用传统执法程序’的做法,违背了这些原则,并给所有广播公司带来了极大的不确定性。”
极高的法律门槛
联邦通讯委员会可以通过两种方式挑战广播公司的牌照资质。其一,该机构可以拒绝续期牌照,这一过程耗时漫长,广播公司在此期间可继续运营。其二,联邦通讯委员会可以吊销牌照,这是更为严厉的处罚手段,实际上会迫使广播公司停播。
该机构在周二发给迪士尼的命令中并未表明将采取上述任何一项措施。然而,专门从事媒体业务的公益律师安德鲁·杰伊·施瓦茨曼告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,尽管联邦通讯委员会有权吊销广播牌照,但这两种行动都面临极高的法律门槛。
“他们绝不可能尝试吊销牌照。法律标准几乎无法达到,”他说道。“吊销牌照要求联邦通讯委员会承担全部举证责任,证明广播公司存在最严重的违规行为和不当行为。”
由于这些保护性条款,联邦通讯委员会几乎从未行使过吊销电视台牌照的权力;施瓦茨曼指出,上一次此类案件发生在数十年前。
法律专家表示,联邦通讯委员会也可以拒绝续期ABC的广播牌照,此类牌照的有效期为八年。但这同样可能引发棘手的法律程序,耗时数年之久。
专注于保护言论自由的非营利组织“个人权利与表达基金会”首席法律顾问罗伯特·科恩-雷维尔表示,该机构必须先证明迪士尼的多元化政策存在歧视行为,并在行政法法官面前陈述其案件。随后法官将针对每一家ABC电视台的牌照作出裁决,所有裁决均可上诉。
“个人权利与表达基金会”首席法律顾问罗伯特·科恩-雷维尔表示,联邦通讯委员会针对迪士尼的歧视指控似乎过于薄弱,不足以挑战ABC的牌照。
“如果他们真的只是关注DEI相关问题,那么他们无法涉及节目内容问题,”科恩-雷维尔说道。“而如果他们提及节目内容问题,那么就会陷入第一修正案相关的大量麻烦之中。”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH6f42sSCQA
Could the FCC yank ABC’s TV licenses amid Trump spat with Kimmel?
2026-05-01 05:00:13 EDT / CBS News
The Federal Communications Commission would face major obstacles in stripping Disney of broadcast licenses for its ABC television stations, according to legal experts.
The FCC on Tuesday ordered an early review of the ABC licenses, saying it is investigating the network as part of its ongoing probe into Disney’s diversity, equity and inclusion practices. ABC owns eight TV stations, including WABC-TV in New York and KABC-TV in Los Angeles.
The timing of the expedited review is drawing scrutiny, as it occurred the day after President Trump called for Jimmy Kimmel’s firing. This followed a joke Kimmel made on his late-night ABC talk show that angered Mr. Trump and his wife, Melania Trump.
“This is a way to put pressure on Disney and ABC to achieve different programming and to get them to fire Jimmy Kimmel,” Katie Fallow, deputy litigation director of Columbia University’s Knight First Amendment Institute, told CBS News, adding that the timing of the FCC’s action is “highly suspect.”
Blair Levin, a policy analyst with investment adviser New Street Research who previously worked at the FCC, said in a report that the “timing of the order is strong evidence that the motive for the early renewal process relates to the president’s call to fire Kimmel, not an ABC employment action.”
FCC allegations against Disney
Launched in March 2025, the FCC’s probe into Disney centers on whether the company’s DEI policies violated federal anti-discrimination rules. In a letter to then-Disney CEO Robert Iger last year, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr claimed that ABC’s mandatory “inclusion standards” may have caused racial and identity quotas at every level of production.
The agency also accuses ABC of using race-based hiring practices and of restricting corporate fellowships to selected demographic groups. The Disney investigation occurred during a broader effort by the Trump administration — already underway at the time — to roll back DEI initiatives across employers, federal agencies, universities and other organizations.
Disney did not respond to a request for comment. In a statement shared with CBS News earlier this week, a spokesperson for the entertainment company said it has a “long record” of operating in full compliance with FCC rules.
“We are confident that the record demonstrates our continued qualifications as licensees under the Communications Act and the First Amendment and are prepared to show that through the appropriate legal channels,” the spokesperson said.
The FCC also declined to comment, referring CBS News to Carr’s remarks at a press conference on Thursday. Asked by a reporter if the FCC’s move to ask Disney to file early license renewal applications for its ABC stations was connected to Kimmel’s joke, Carr instead focused on the agency’s allegations of discrimination.
“You can go all the way back to more than a year ago, in March of last year, where I wrote a letter to Disney saying that there was evidence… or allegations indicating that Disney, through this sort of invidious form of DEI discrimination, was creating, as I specified in a letter to them, racially segregated spaces inside the company,” he said.
Carr also noted that the FCC earlier this week ordered another broadcaster, Bridge News, to file early license renewal applications for its TV stations.
“We’ve been very clear that we’re holding broadcasters accountable to their obligations — not just public interest standards, but [equal employment opportunity] obligations,” Carr said, without commenting on Kimmel.
Rarely used sanction
The FCC has only rarely denied broadcast license renewals. In 1975, however, the agency denied renewal of five radio station licenses after finding that the parent company’s owner instructed stations to provide favorable coverage of two men running for Senate, according to a research paper from Chad Raphael, a communications professor at Santa Clara University.
The National Association of Broadcasters said in a statement on Wednesday that the license renewal process must be grounded in “predictability, fairness, and transparency.”
The FCC’s “nearly unprecedented request for one company to quickly reapply for all of its licenses — rather than utilize its traditional enforcement process — runs contrary to these principles and creates significant uncertainty for all broadcasters,” the trade group said.
High legal bar
The FCC can challenge broadcasters’ licensing in two ways. First, the agency can decline to renew a license, which involves a lengthy legal process during which the broadcaster can continue operating. Second, the FCC can revoke a license, a more severe sanction that effectively forces a broadcaster off the air.
The agency did not state in its order to Disney on Tuesday that it would take either measure. Yet while the FCC has the authority to revoke broadcast licenses, both actions face a high legal bar, Andrew Jay Schwartzman, a public interest lawyer specializing in media, told CBS News.
“There’s no way they would try to revoke the license. The legal standard is insurmountable,” he said. “Revocation places the entire burden on the FCC to demonstrate that the broadcaster is engaged in the most gross forms of abuse of rules and misconduct.”
Due to these guardrails, the FCC has almost never exercised its power to revoke a TV station’s license; Schwartzman notes that the last such case was several decades ago.
The FCC could also deny renewal of ABC’s broadcast licenses, which are granted for eight-year terms, legal experts said. Yet that also could require a nettlesome legal process that could drag on for years.
The agency would have to document how Disney’s diversity policies are discriminatory and present its case before an administrative law judge, said Robert Corn-Revere, chief counsel at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a nonprofit organization focused on protecting free speech. The judge would then have to issue a decision on each ABC station license, which could all be appealed.
Robert Corn-Revere, chief counsel at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a nonprofit organization focused on protecting free speech, said the FCC’s allegations of discrimination against Disney seem too flimsy to challenge ABC’s licenses.
“If they’re really just noticing issues on DEI, then they would not be able to get into the programming issues,” Corn-Revere said. “And if they do list programming issues, they buy themselves a whole lot of trouble under the First Amendment.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH6f42sSCQA
发表回复