美联储迄今对战争对经济影响的观察


2026-04-29T10:14:13.831Z / 路透社

作者:丹·伯恩斯

2026年4月29日 美国东部时间上午10:14 更新于2小时前

2026年3月31日,美国纽约布鲁克林区Sunoco加油站展示的汽油价格

  • 内容摘要
  • 劳动力市场受战争影响极小,失业救济申请人数保持稳定
  • 通胀大幅攀升,主要由汽油价格推动;核心通胀指标受影响相对较小
  • 增长前景不明朗,零售销售和部分制造业指标上升,但工业产出下降

4月29日(路透社)——美联储官员上一次会议是在美领导对伊朗战争爆发两周多后召开的,当时他们除了飙升的汽油价格外,几乎没有其他数据可以评估战争对经济以及利率前景的影响。

随着他们本周再次举行会议,过去六周的数据并未大幅改善这一评估局面,尤其是在对其政策制定最为关键的就业市场、通胀和整体经济活动方面。

订阅路透社商业新闻简报,每日突发商业新闻直接发送至您的收件箱。点击此处注册

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

以下是美联储3月中旬开会时可获取的战争爆发以来的数据快照,以及这些数据此后的变化情况。

就业

截至目前,就业市场几乎未显现出战争带来的明显影响。整体就业增长数据受到一次性因素干扰,比如加州的医疗罢工和恶劣天气,因此几乎无法提供有效信号。3月失业率小幅下降,但主要原因是劳动参与率下滑。反映裁员情况的每周首次申请失业救济人数——这是了解就业市场状况最及时的窗口——在战争爆发以来的八次统计中几乎没有变化,其中六次数据是在美联储官员上一次会议之后发布的。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

|数据|3月17-18日已掌握|战争爆发后新增|
|—|—|—|
|非农就业人数变化|2月:-9.2万
3月:+17.8万|2月(修正后):-13.3万|
|失业率|2月:4.4%
3月:4.3%|无|
|失业救济申请人数|2次报告,基本无变化|6次报告,基本无变化|

通胀

战争爆发以来,整体通胀读数大幅走高,汽油价格领涨,上涨约三分之一,全国平均价格突破每加仑4美元大关。消费者价格指数(CPI)和生产者价格指数(PPI)显示价格涨幅达到三到四年以来的最高水平。剔除食品尤其是能源成本后,整体价格增长压力迄今有所缓解。

不过,美联储尚未获得用于设定2%通胀目标的个人消费支出(PCE)价格指数的正式战时数据,且要等到本周会议结束后的周四才能看到3月份的报告——这是冲突爆发后的第一个完整自然月的数据。但基于CPI和PPI读数的估算显示,自战争爆发以来,整体通胀和核心通胀均进一步高于目标水平。

根据美国供应管理协会(ISM)的采购经理月度基准调查,2月制造业投入成本已大幅飙升,3月升至三年半以来的新高。

美联储官员担忧,物价高企持续的时间越长——尤其是像汽油这样对消费者通胀预期影响重大的商品——通胀预期开始脱锚的风险就越大,这将使他们抑制通胀的工作变得更加困难。一些波动性较大的家庭通胀预期指标,比如密歇根大学消费者信心指数调查,自战争爆发以来显著走高。其他指标则相对平稳,表明目前预期仍未脱锚,包括纽约联储的消费者预期调查以及基于市场的指标,如美国通胀保值债券(TIPS)盈亏平衡通胀率和衍生出的五年后五年远期利率。

|数据|3月17-18日已掌握|战争爆发后新增|
|—|—|—|
|CPI|2月:
环比0.3%
同比2.4%
核心(剔除食品和能源):
环比0.2%
同比2.5%|3月:
环比0.9%
同比3.3%
核心:
环比0.2%
同比2.6%|
|PPI|1月:
环比0.5%
同比2.9%
核心(剔除食品、能源、贸易服务):
环比0.3%
同比3.4%|3月:
环比0.5%
同比4.0%
核心:
环比0.2%
同比3.6%
2月:
环比0.5%(修正后)
同比3.4%(修正后)
核心:
环比0.5%
同比3.5%
1月(修正后):
环比0.6%
同比3.1%
核心:
环比0.5%
同比3.5%|
|PCE|1月:
环比0.3%
同比2.8%
核心:
环比0.4%
同比3.1%|2月:
环比0.4%
同比2.8%
核心:
环比0.4%
同比3.0%|
|ISM制造业支付价格指数|2月:70.5|3月:78.3|
|密歇根大学通胀预期|2月:
一年期3.4%
五年期3.3%|3月:
一年期3.8%
五年期3.2%
4月:
一年期4.7%
五年期3.5%|
|纽约联储消费者预期调查通胀预期|2月:
一年期3.0%
三年期3.0%|3月:
一年期3.4%
三年期3.1%|
|TIPS盈亏平衡率|3月16日:
五年期2.64%
十年期2.36%
五年后五年远期2.14%|4月27日:
五年期2.65%
十年期2.45%
五年后五年远期2.23%|

增长与消费

美联储官员要到本周会议结束后才能看到哪怕仅涵盖冲突部分时段的国内生产总值(GDP)报告。最新的可用数据仍为2025年第四季度,当时增长受到创纪录时长的联邦政府停摆抑制。据路透社调查的经济学家预计,第一季度经济增长率将反弹至2.3%,但预估区间从-0.2%到+3.9%不等,鉴于战争影响的不确定性,这一区间异常宽泛。增长反弹部分得益于去年共和党减税政策的影响,该政策导致本报税季个人退税金额增加,似乎提振了家庭支出,同时更快的商业投资折旧预计将提升企业资本支出。

与GDP情况一样,美联储官员尚未看到包含冲突时期的完整消费者支出报告,但零售销售等其他消费衡量指标在整体和核心层面均有所上升。

|数据|3月17-18日已掌握|战争爆发后新增|
|—|—|—|
|GDP 第四季度第二次预估:0.7%|第四季度第三次预估:0.5%|无|
|零售销售|1月:
环比-0.2%
核心零售:环比0.3%|3月:
环比1.7%
核心零售:环比0.7%
2月:
环比0.7%(修正后)
核心零售:环比0.6%(修正后)
1月(修正后):
环比0.0%
核心零售:环比0.5%|
|消费者支出|1月:环比0.4%|2月:环比0.5%
1月(修正后):环比0.3%|

工业活动

部分制造业活动指标出现回升,部分原因是客户因战争导致全球供应链受阻,试图增加商品库存以应对短缺风险。但美联储自身的工业产出数据显示,2月录得一年来最大涨幅后,3月出现18个月来最大跌幅。

|数据|3月17-18日已掌握|战争爆发后新增|
|—|—|—|
|工业产出|2月:环比0.2%|3月:环比-0.5%
2月(修正后):环比0.7%|
|制造业产出|2月:环比0.2%|3月:环比-0.1%
2月(修正后):环比0.4%|
|ISM制造业指数|2月:52.4|3月:52.7|

丹·伯恩斯报道;安德里亚·里奇编辑

本报编辑准则:路透社诚信原则

What the Fed has seen about the war’s impact on the economy so far

2026-04-29T10:14:13.831Z / Reuters

By Dan Burns

April 29, 2026 10:14 AM UTC Updated 2 hours ago

节点运行失败

Gasoline prices are displayed at a Sunoco station in the Brooklyn borough of New York City, U.S., March 31, 2026. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo

  • Summary
  • Labor market shows minimal impact from war, jobless claims steady
  • Inflation rises sharply, mainly due to gasoline prices; core measures less affected
  • Growth outlook uncertain, retail sales and some manufacturing indicators up, but industrial output down

April 29 (Reuters) – Federal Reserve officials last met just over two weeks into the U.S.-led war on Iran and then had little data at their disposal beyond surging gasoline prices to assess its impact on the economy ​and the outlook for interest rates.

As they meet again this week, the data over the past six weeks has not done much to sharpen that picture, especially on the ‌topics most critical to their policymaking like the job market, inflation and overall activity.

Get a daily digest of breaking business news straight to your inbox with the Reuters Business newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Here’s a snapshot of what figures were available to them since the war’s start when they met in mid-March and how those have evolved since.

EMPLOYMENT

The job market has shown almost no visible imprint from the war so far. Headline job growth figures have been distorted by one-time factors, such as a healthcare strike in California and bad weather, so have provided little signal. The jobless rate ticked lower in March but largely ​because of a decline in the workforce. Layoff activity as indicated by weekly reports on new claims for unemployment benefits – the most timely window into the state of the job market – has ​shown almost no change through eight readings over the course of the war so far, six of which have come in since Fed officials last met.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Data Latest in ⁠hand March 17-18 New since
Nonfarm payrolls change February: -92k March: +178k

February (rev.): -133k
Unemployment rate February: 4.4%March: 4.3%
Jobless claims 2 weekly reports, little changed 6 weekly reports, little changed

INFLATION

Headline inflation readings have shot higher since the war’s onset, led by gasoline prices climbing by roughly a ​third to crest the $4-a-gallon mark on a national average. Measures such as the Consumer Price Index and Producer Price Index have shown prices accelerating by the most in three to four years. Stripping out food and especially ​energy costs shows broader price-growth pressures to be somewhat less aggravated so far.

The Fed has yet, however, to see a formal wartime reading of the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index that it uses to set its 2% inflation target and will not see a report for March, the first full month of the conflict, until Thursday, a day after this week’s meeting adjourns. But estimates based off the CPI and PPI readings suggest it has moved further above target since the war began ​at both the headline and core level.

Manufacturing input costs, which had soared in February according to the Institute for Supply Management’s benchmark monthly survey of purchasing managers, rose to a new three-and-a-half-year high in March.

Fed officials ​worry that the longer prices stay elevated – especially for products as influential as gasoline in shaping consumers’ outlooks for price changes – risks may grow that inflation expectations begin to become unanchored, and that would make their job of inflation containment ‌all the harder. ⁠Some more volatile measures of households’ inflation expectations, such as the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index survey, are notably higher since the war began. Other measures have remained more subdued to suggest expectations remain anchored for now, including the New York Fed’s Survey of Consumer Expectations and market-based gauges like Treasury Inflation Protected Securities breakeven inflation rates and a derivative of those known as the five-year, five-year forward rate.

Data Latest in hand March 17-18 New since
CPI February:

0.3% m/m

2.4% y/y

Core (ex-food, energy):

0.2% m/m

2.5% y/yMarch:

0.9% m/m

3.3% y/y

Core:

0.2% m/m

2.6% y/y
PPI January:

0.5% m/m

2.9% y/y

Core (ex-food, energy, trade):

0.3% m/m

3.4% y/y March:

0.5% m/m

4.0% y/y

Core:

0.2% m/m

3.6% y/y

February:

0.5% m/m (rev.)

3.4% y/y (rev.)

Core:

0.5% m/m

3.5% y/y

January (rev.):

0.6% m/m

3.1% y/y

Core:

0.5% m/m

3.5% y/y
PCE January:

0.3% m/m

2.8% y/y

Core:

0.4% m/m

3.1% y/y February:

0.4% m/m

2.8% y/y

Core:

0.4% m/m

3.0% y/y
ISM prices ​paid index February: 70.5 March: 78.3
UMich inflation expectations February:

3.4% 1-year

3.3% 5-year March:

3.8% 1-year

3.2% ​5-year

April:

4.7% 1-year

3.5% 5-year
New York Fed SCE inflation expectations February:

3.0% ⁠1-year

3.0% 3-year March:

3.4% 1-year

3.1% 3-year
TIPS brekevens March 16:

2.64% 5-year

2.36% 10-year

2.14% 5Y5Y fwd April 27:

2.65% 5-year

2.45% 10-year

2.23% 5Y5Y fwd

GROWTH & CONSUMPTION

Fed officials will not see a gross domestic product report covering even part of the conflict period until after this week’s meeting. The latest-available figures still refer to the fourth quarter of 2025, a period when growth was restrained by ​a record-long federal government shutdown. Economic growth is expected to have rebounded to 2.3% in the first quarter, according to economists polled by Reuters, but ​the range of estimates from minus ⁠0.2% to plus 3.9% is unusually wide given the uncertainty over the war’s impact. The growth recovery is owing in part to the effects of the Republican tax cuts enacted last year, which resulted in larger individual tax refunds this filing season that appear to be buoying household spending and faster business investment depreciation that is seen lifting corporate capital expenditures.

As with GDP, Fed officials still have not seen a full consumer spending report that includes the ⁠conflict period, but ​other measures of consumption like retail sales have risen at both the headline and core levels.

Data Latest in hand March 17-18 New since
GDP Q4 ​2nd read:

0.7%Q4 3rd read:

0.5%
Retail sales January:

-0.2%

Control:

0.3%March:

1.7%

Control:

0.7%

February:

0.7% (rev.)

Control:

0.6% (rev.)

January (rev.):

0.0%

Control:

0.5%
Consumer spending January:

0.4%February:

0.5%

January (rev.):

0.3%

INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY

Some measures of manufacturing activity have seen a lift thanks in part to customers trying to build goods stockpiles in anticipation of shortages as global supply chains get gummed up by the war. But the Fed’s own industrial output ​data flipped from reporting the biggest gain in a year in February to the biggest drop in 18 months in March.

Data Latest in hand March 17-18 New since
Industrial production February:

0.2%March:

-0.5%

February (rev.):

0.7%
Manufacturing output February:

0.2%March:

-0.1%

February (rev.):

0.4%
ISM manufacturing index February:

52.4 March:

52.7

Reporting by Dan Burns; Editing by Andrea Ricci

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注