2026年4月28日 / 美国东部时间晚上10:32 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
周二,一名联邦法官驳回了司法部针对亚利桑那州选民信息的诉讼,这是特朗普政府在全国范围内推动获取选民数据计划的又一次失败。
美国地区法官苏珊·布罗尼奇支持亚利桑那州州务卿阿德里安·丰特斯的立场,认定1960年《民权法案》第三章并未赋予司法部要求亚利桑那州提交全州选民登记名单的权力。
“本案涉及的法律问题是:司法部部长是否有权依据第三章获取全州选民登记名单,”这位由特朗普任命的法官写道。“本案并不涉及政治问题:司法部部长是否应该有权获取全州选民登记名单。”
丰特斯和亚利桑那州总检察长克里斯·梅斯对这一裁决表示欢迎,他们在周四的联合声明中表示,司法部索要的数据“包含数百万亚利桑那州选民的敏感个人信息”。
“亚利桑那州拒绝这一要求的做法是正确的,今天的裁决证实了这一决定的合法性,”他们说。“我们两个办公室将继续捍卫亚利桑那州选民的隐私,抵制联邦政府的越权行为。”
哥伦比亚广播公司新闻已联系司法部征求评论。
此次裁决是司法部在索要州级选民数据的诉讼中第六次败诉,此前加利福尼亚州、俄勒冈州、密歇根州、马萨诸塞州和罗得岛州也作出了类似的不利于司法部的裁决。
司法部于去年夏天要求丰特斯提交亚利桑那州的选民登记名单,称其正在核查该州对《全国选民登记法》和《帮助美国投票法》的遵守情况。该部门随后明确表示,需要获取选民的全名、出生日期、家庭住址,以及驾照号码或部分社会安全号码。
丰特斯以州和联邦隐私法为由拒绝共享该数据。司法部随后于1月对该州提起诉讼。
司法部已就选民数据问题起诉了数十个其他州和华盛顿特区,通常的理由是需要确保各州遵守联邦法律中关于维护准确选民登记名单的要求。一名司法部官员上个月表示,政府希望对亚利桑那州的选民登记数据进行“个性化评估”。
联邦政府在另一起涉及罗得岛州选民登记名单的诉讼中承认,计划将该州的数据提交给国土安全部数据库,以核查是否有非公民登记投票。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻上个月曾报道,司法部和国土安全部达成协议,将选民登记数据用于移民和刑事调查。
特朗普先生数月来一直在寻求扩大联邦政府在选举中的权限,指责各州管理选举流程不当,并且毫无根据地声称美国选举中充斥着欺诈行为。他经常提及非公民投票的问题,尽管这种情况非常罕见。
这位总统一直在推动议员们通过一项名为《拯救美国法案》的立法,该法案将要求人们在登记投票时提供公民身份证明,并在投票时出示身份证件。
他还于去年签署了一项行政命令,试图强制要求提供公民身份证明,但被一名法官裁定无效。今年早些时候,特朗普签署了另一项行政命令,指示其政府制定每个州符合投票资格的已确认美国公民名单,并表示美国邮政局只能向每个州的联邦准备名单上的人员邮寄缺席选票。已有近24个州就该命令提起诉讼。
Judge tosses out Trump administration lawsuit seeking access to Arizona voter data
April 28, 2026 / 10:32 PM EDT / CBS News
A federal judge on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit from the Justice Department seeking information on Arizona voters, another defeat in the Trump administration’s nationwide push for voter data.
U.S. District Judge Susan Brnovich sided with Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, finding that Title III of the Civil Rights Act of 1960 doesn’t grant the Justice Department the power to demand that Arizona produce its statewide voter registration list.
“This case presents a legal question: is the Attorney General entitled to the SVRL under Title III,” the Trump-nominated judge wrote. “It does not present a political question: should the Attorney General be entitled to the SVRL.”
Fontes and Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes hailed the ruling, writing in a joint statement Thursday that the data sought by the Justice Department “contains the sensitive personal information of millions of Arizona voters.”
“Arizona acted correctly in refusing this request, and today’s ruling vindicates that decision,” they said. “Our offices will continue to defend the privacy of Arizona voters against federal overreach.”
CBS News has reached out to the Justice Department for comment.
The ruling marks the Justice Department’s sixth loss in lawsuits seeking state-level voter data, following similar rulings in California, Oregon, Michigan, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
The Justice Department asked Fontes to hand over Arizona’s voter registration list last summer, saying it was checking the state’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act and Help America Vote Act. The department later clarified that it needed voters’ full names, dates of birth, home addresses and either their driver’s license numbers or partial Social Security numbers.
Fontes declined to share that data, citing state and federal privacy laws. The Justice Department then sued the state in January.
The Justice Department has sued dozens of other states and Washington, D.C., for voter data, usually citing a need to ensure that states were complying with federal laws requiring states to maintain accurate voter registration lists. A department official wrote last month that the government is looking to do an “individualized assessment” of Arizona’s voter registration data.
The federal government acknowledged in a separate lawsuit involving Rhode Island’s voter registration list that it planned to run that state’s data through a Homeland Security database to check if any noncitizens are registered to vote. CBS News reported last month on a deal between the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security to use voter registration data for immigration and criminal investigations.
Mr. Trump has sought for months to expand the federal government’s role in elections, accusing states of mismanaging the process and claiming — without evidence — that U.S. elections are riddled with fraud. He has often focused on voting by noncitizens, which is rare.
The president has pushed lawmakers to pass legislation called the SAVE America Act that would require people to show proof of citizenship to register to vote and an ID to cast a ballot.
He also signed an executive order last year that sought to impose a proof-of-citizenship requirement, which a judge struck down. Earlier this year, Mr. Trump signed a separate order that directed his administration to draw up lists of confirmed U.S. citizens who are eligible to vote in each state, and said the U.S. Postal Service can only send absentee ballots to people on each state’s federally prepared list. Almost two dozen states are suing over the order.
发表回复