2026-04-16 17:17:57 UTC / 路透社
作者:安德鲁·古兹沃德 贾娜·温特
2026年4月16日 世界标准时间17:17 更新于3小时前
节点运行失败
2019年10月30日,美国华盛顿国家记者俱乐部,前中央情报局局长约翰·布伦南在主题为“2020愿景:情报与美国总统选举”的选举安全论坛上发言。路透社/约书亚·罗伯茨/档案照片
- 摘要
- 据熟悉调查的人士透露,FBI将约谈前情报官员
- 调查聚焦于前中情局局长的证词
- 特朗普政府司法部已针对特朗普批评者发起多起调查
华盛顿4月15日路透电 —— 两位熟悉该调查的人士表示,美国联邦调查局(FBI)计划在针对前中央情报局局长约翰·布伦南的刑事调查中约谈约六名证人,此次调查围绕一份认定俄罗斯干预2016年美国大选以帮助唐纳德·特朗普的情报评估展开。
两位消息人士称,此前从未被报道过的约谈预计将包括参与2017年那份评估的前情报官员,调查将深入探究特朗普-俄罗斯调查的起源——这是特朗普长期敦促检察官追查的议题。
《路透社伊朗简报》新闻通讯将为您提供伊朗局势的最新动态与分析,点击此处订阅。
广告 · 滚动以继续阅读
此次调查是特朗普政府司法部重新审视一项调查的深远举措,该调查的核心结论后来得到了司法部、两党参议院委员会以及中央情报局审查的证实,这引发了批评人士的担忧,即特朗普政府正在利用检察权力打击被视为对手的人,并重新审理特朗普第一任期内的核心事件。
路透社无法确定未来几周将被约谈的人员的具体身份。消息人士称,调查人员已经进行了少量证人约谈。
广告 · 滚动以继续阅读
此次调查由迈阿密美国检察官办公室主导,已开展数月。消息人士表示,调查似乎聚焦于布伦南2023年就该评估的制定过程在国会作证时的内容。
布伦南的律师在去年12月的一封信中披露,检察官已告知布伦南他是此次调查的目标。
特朗普的盟友、俄亥俄州众议员吉姆·乔丹于去年10月将布伦南提交给司法部,指控这位前中情局局长在2023年的证词中向众议院司法委员会作出虚假陈述。
作为有线电视新闻分析师和长期批评特朗普的人士,布伦南谴责针对他的调查是带有政治偏见的,是对法律体系的滥用。他的律师在去年12月致迈阿密地区法院首席法官的信中称,此次调查没有“法律上站得住脚的依据”,并指责检察官使用了不当手段。
布伦南的律师拒绝置评。
司法部发言人拒绝置评。FBI未回应置评请求。
一场持续已久的争端
两位执法官员告诉路透社,本月从帕姆·邦迪手中接管司法部、出任代理司法部长的托德·布兰切,此前作为邦迪的高级副手协助监督了此次调查,并在最近几周与司法部高层召开会议审议调查进展。
特朗普本月解雇了邦迪,原因是对他要求开展的调查的进度和结果感到不满。
另外两位了解调查情况的消息人士称,即将进行的证人约谈是在4月2日邦迪被解雇前就安排好的,似乎并非直接针对她的被解职。
2017年1月特朗普首次就职前几天发布的那份情报评估认定,俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京试图提升共和党候选人特朗普的参选前景,并诋毁其民主党对手希拉里·克林顿。
特朗普长期以来将以往针对他与莫斯科关联的调查斥为“骗局”和旨在破坏其2017年至2021年第一任期的政治操弄。
截至目前,检察官已至少分两批发出传票,向多名前情报和执法官员索要与2017年评估制定过程相关的信息。
鉴于布伦南2023年的证词是在华盛顿的众议院委员会上作出的,而非在佛罗里达州,因此在南佛罗里达州提起的针对布伦南的诉讼可能面临法律质疑。华盛顿的法官和大陪审团此前就对调查和起诉特朗普目标的努力持抵制态度。
众议院司法委员会共和党主席乔丹的举报指控布伦南在讨论所谓的“斯蒂尔档案”时向该委员会撒谎。该档案由一名前英国情报官员撰写,内容涉及特朗普与俄罗斯之间所谓的关联。这份由特朗普政治对手资助、包含未经证实传闻的档案,一直是特朗普及其盟友所称的俄罗斯调查存在政治偏见的焦点。
布伦南多次表示,中央情报局反对将该档案纳入情报评估。其调查结果摘要被附在报告的机密版本中。
安德鲁·古兹沃德、贾娜·温特报道;迈克尔·利尔蒙、霍华德·戈勒编辑
我们的准则:汤姆森路透社信任原则
Exclusive: FBI under Trump ramps up probe of ex-CIA chief Brennan over Russia report, sources say
2026-04-16 17:17:57 UTC / Reuters
By Andrew Goudsward and Jana Winter
April 16, 2026 5:17 PM UTC Updated 3 hours ago
节点运行失败
Former CIA director John Brennan speaks during a forum on election security titled, “2020 Vision: Intelligence and the U.S. Presidential Election” at the National Press Club in Washington, U.S., October 30, 2019. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/File Photo
- Summary
- FBI to interview ex-intelligence officials, say people familiar with investigation
- Investigation focuses on testimony of ex-CIA chief
- Trump Justice Department has pursued several investigations into Trump critics
WASHINGTON, April 15 (Reuters) – The FBI plans to question roughly a half-dozen witnesses in its criminal inquiry into ex-CIA Director John Brennan over a U.S. intelligence assessment that found Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump, said two people familiar with the investigation.
The interviews, which have not been previously reported and are expected to include former intelligence officials involved in the 2017 assessment, will delve into the origins of the Trump-Russia inquiry — an issue Trump has long urged that prosecutors pursue, the two sources said.
The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The probe represents a far-reaching effort by Trump’s Justice Department to revisit an investigation whose core conclusions were later affirmed by the Justice Department, a bipartisan Senate committee and a CIA review, fueling critics’ concerns that the Trump administration is using prosecutorial power to target perceived adversaries and re-litigate a central episode of Trump’s first term.
Reuters could not determine the specific identities of the people set to be interviewed over the next several weeks. Investigators have already conducted a small number of witness interviews, sources said.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The probe is being run by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami and has been under way for months. The sources said it appears to be focusing on congressional testimony Brennan gave in 2023 about the crafting of the assessment.
Brennan was told by prosecutors that he is a target of the investigation, his attorney disclosed in a letter in December.
A Trump ally, Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, referred Brennan to the DOJ in October, alleging the former CIA director had made false statements to the House Judiciary Committee during the 2023 testimony.
Brennan, a cable news analyst and longtime critic of Trump, has condemned reported investigations into him as politically biased and a misuse of the legal system. His lawyer, in the December letter to the chief District Court judge in Miami, said there was no “legally justifiable basis” for the investigation and accused prosecutors of using improper tactics.
Brennan’s attorney declined to comment.
A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment. The FBI did not respond to a request for comment.
A LONG-RUNNING DISPUTE
Todd Blanche, who assumed the job of acting attorney general this month when he took over the Justice Department from Pam Bondi, helped oversee the investigation as her top deputy and convened meetings with DOJ leaders to review its progress in recent weeks, two law enforcement officials told Reuters.
Trump fired Bondi this month amid frustration with the pace and outcome of investigations he demanded.
The forthcoming witness interviews were scheduled before Bondi’s ouster on April 2 and do not appear to be a direct reaction to her dismissal, according to the two other sources with knowledge of the probe.
The intelligence assessment, issued in January 2017 days before Trump’s first inauguration, concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to boost the Republican Trump’s candidacy and denigrate his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.
Trump has long railed against past investigations into his ties to Moscow as a “hoax” and a politically motivated effort to undermine his first term, which ran from 2017 to 2021.
Prosecutors have so far sent at least two batches of subpoenas seeking information about the crafting of the 2017 assessment from a range of former intelligence and law enforcement officials.
A prosecution of Brennan based in southern Florida could face legal challenges given that Brennan’s 2023 testimony took place before a House committee in Washington, not in Florida. Judges and grand juries in Washington have been resistant to previous efforts to investigate and prosecute Trump’s targets.
The referral from Jordan, the Republican chair of the House Judiciary Committee, alleged Brennan lied to the panel in discussing the so-called Steele dossier, a report by a former British intelligence officer on purported ties between Trump and Russia. The dossier, which was funded by Trump’s political opponents and included unverified rumors, has been the focus of claims by Trump and his allies of political bias in the Russia probe.
Brennan has repeatedly said the CIA opposed including the dossier in the intelligence assessment. A summary of its findings was attached to a classified version of the report.
Reporting by Andrew Goudsward and Jana Winter; Editing by Michael Learmonth and Howard Goller
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复