新闻资讯

博客

  • 民主党关于移民的停摆要求有多受欢迎？


    分析：艾伦·布雷克
    发布时间：2026年2月13日，美国东部时间上午10:27

    参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默在美国国会大厦的新闻发布会上指着一张民主党要求改革移民和海关执法局（ICE）的海报。

    格雷姆·斯隆/彭博社/盖蒂图片社

    移民 联邦机构 选举 民意调查 国家安全

    国会几乎可以肯定，将再次导致联邦政府大部分部门停摆。

    在周五午夜的最后期限前，共和党人和民主党人之间几乎没有达成资助国土安全部的协议迹象。共和党高层于周四将其普通党员送回家。

    一方最终将不得不让步，而拟议的移民执法改革的受欢迎程度将对哪一方“获胜”产生重大影响。与此同时，人们很快会看到对航空旅行、应急响应服务以及在某种程度上对移民执法的影响。

    僵局源于对改革特朗普政府在明尼阿波利斯等地使用移民和海关执法局（ICE）和边境巡逻队的分歧，联邦探员在那里已经造成两人死亡：蕾妮·古德和亚历克斯·普雷蒂。特朗普政府周四宣布，将结束在明尼阿波利斯增派探员的行动。

    共和党人和民主党人都表示，美国民众站在自己一边。特朗普政府和共和党人指出，数据显示美国人希望将非法移民驱逐出境。民主党人则坚持认为，美国民众支持他们，因为绝大多数人不赞成ICE的做法，并表示驱逐行动“走得太远”。

    那么谁是对的？显然，美国人并不支持现状，本周美国全国广播公司新闻与SurveyMonkey的民调显示，70%的人希望至少对ICE进行改革（约30%的人希望废除ICE）。民主党人显然在这里拥有一些影响力。

    但这种影响力有多大？让我们来分析一下民主党推动的几项具体提案。

    结束巡逻执法

    美国政府已非正式地略微放松了ICE在街头随机拦截的做法，至少目前如此。在第二次死亡事件后，边境负责人汤姆·霍曼接管明尼阿波利斯的行动时表示，行动将更加“有针对性”。

    关于更正式的法律限制，民意调查结果有些复杂。

    皮尤研究中心一年前的一项民调发现，66%的美国人认为执法部门应该能够在抗议或集会上逮捕非法移民。另有63%的人认为应该能够在其家中逮捕，54%的人认为应该能够在工作场所逮捕。

    但这些问题都没有具体询问随机拦截街头人员的情况。皮尤研究中心当年晚些时候的民调显示，54%的人不赞成工作场所突袭。

    尽管如此，似乎有理由认为，明尼阿波利斯探员在公共场所拦截人员的场景，在60%的美国人认为特朗普的移民执法“走得太远”这一结果中发挥了重要作用。

    正当程序

    民主党人指责特朗普政府称，它可以在没有司法令状的情况下进入某人的家中——而仅使用更容易获得的行政令状，由行政部门自己提供。

    考虑到特朗普政府尽管在这方面屡犯错误，仍试图加速驱逐行动，民主党人还推动通过其他方式将正当程序法典化。

    但众议院议长迈克·约翰逊称，要求司法令状是“不可行的提议”。特朗普政府则反复辩称，非法移民不应享有与公民同等的正当程序权利。

    民调显示：美国人似乎认为，被ICE针对的人应有权充分质疑其驱逐决定。

    路透社与益普索7月的一项民调显示，50%的美国人不同意“被怀疑的非法移民不应享有正当程序”这一说法，37%的人同意。

    5月的一项公共宗教研究中心民调显示，美国人以61%对37%的优势反对像特朗普政府那样在没有正当程序的情况下将人驱逐到外国监狱。

    佩戴口罩和随身摄像头

    随身摄像头似乎是一个共识问题，最近的一项昆尼皮亚克大学民调显示，92%的人认为应该要求佩戴。国土安全部最近宣布，探员将佩戴摄像头。

    ICE探员佩戴口罩的能力是两党之间更具争议的话题。民主党人警告说，口罩会让探员产生不受惩罚的感觉，而政府则表示，口罩对于防止“人肉搜索”（即分享探员的个人信息）至关重要，这可能导致探员成为目标。

    但如果由美国民众决定，口罩将被禁止。

    昆尼皮亚克民调显示，登记选民中61%的人认为不应允许佩戴口罩，35%的人认为应该允许。美国全国广播公司的民调显示，63%的美国人不赞成佩戴口罩。值得注意的是，强烈反对口罩的人（49%）大约是强烈赞成的两倍（24%）。

    防止种族貌视

    共和党人辩称，最近最高法院的裁决允许移民执法部门根据外貌或语言来针对人员。

    尽管如此，这并不意味着美国人喜欢这一政策。皮尤民调上个月发现，72%的美国人认为移民官员以外貌或语言为由检查移民身份是不可接受的。

    明尼阿波利斯流传甚广的一段视频显示，一名边境巡逻队探员告诉一名男子，他要求对方出示文件“因为你的口音”。当地警察局长引用了可能存在的种族貌视案例，而国土安全部对此予以否认。

    提高官员标准

    由于特朗普去年的重大议程法案中大幅增加了资金，政府迅速扩大了ICE。ICE很快成为资金最充足的联邦执法机构，遥遥领先。

    民主党人长期以来一直担心，这可能导致大量训练不足的官员涌入。

    很难衡量美国人对此的具体看法。但路透社与益普索本月的民调显示，80%的美国人认为培训和行为标准“极其”（57%）或“非常”（23%）重要。

    统一行为准则

    民主党人正在推动建立一个新的移民执法问责制度。美国人表示，他们希望加强监督。

    民调反复显示，他们不信任政府能够实现这种问责——尤其是在政府明显试图避免对枪杀古德的ICE探员进行全面调查之后（政府表示，在两党呼吁后，将对普雷蒂的死亡进行更实质性的调查）。

    古德被杀后，益普索上个月的一项民调显示，59%的美国人认为调查不会公平，39%的人认为会公平。

    同样，昆尼皮亚克民调显示，61%的美国人认为政府没有如实说明普雷蒂被杀的情况，25%的人认为政府如实说明了。

    高达80%的人表示应该进行“独立”调查。甚至多数共和党人（56%）也支持这一点。

    移民 联邦机构 选举 民意调查 国家安全

    How popular are Democrats’ shutdown demands on immigration?

    Analysis by Aaron Blake
    PUBLISHED Feb 13, 2026, 10:27 AM ET

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer points to a poster of Democrats’ demands for ICE reform, during a news conference at the US Capitol on Thursday.

    Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg/Getty Images

    Immigration Federal agencies Election polls National security

    Congress is now virtually assured to, yet again, shut down major parts of the federal government.

    There’s little sign of an agreement between Republicans and Democrats to fund the Department of Homeland Security ahead of the Friday midnight deadline. And GOP leaders sent their rank-and-file members home Thursday.

    One side will eventually have to cave, and the popularity of proposed changes to immigration enforcement will have a major impact on which side “wins.” Meanwhile, people will soon see impacts on their air travel, emergency response services and, to some extent, immigration enforcement.

    The standoff stems from disagreements about reforming the Trump administration’s use of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol in places like Minneapolis, where federal agents have killed two people: Renee Good and Alex Pretti. The Trump administration announced Thursday that it’s ending its surge of agents in Minneapolis.

    Both Republicans and Democrats say the American people are on their side. The Trump administration and Republicans point to numbers that show Americans want undocumented immigrants to be deported. Democrats insist the American people side with them because a large majority disapprove of ICE and say the deportation effort has gone “too far.”

    So who’s right? It’s clear Americans aren’t supporting the status quo, with an NBC News-SurveyMonkey poll this week showing 7 in 10 want to at least see changes to ICE (about 3 in 10 want it abolished). Democrats obviously have some leverage here.

    But how much? Let’s break down a few of the specific proposals Democrats are pushing.

    Ending roving patrols

    ICE agents depart the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis on February 4.

    John Moore/Getty Images

    The administration has unofficially backed off a bit on ICE conducting random stops in the street, at least for now. When border czar Tom Homan took over in Minneapolis after the second death, he signaled the operation would be more “targeted.”

    The polling is a bit mixed on more official legal restrictions.

    A Pew Research Center poll a year ago found 66% of Americans said law enforcement should be able to arrest undocumented immigrants at protests or rallies. Another 63% said it should be able to do so in their homes, and 54% said it should be fair game at workplaces.

    But none of these specifically ask about stopping random people on the streets. And Pew polling later that year showed 54% disapproved of workplace raids.

    Still, it seems logical to assume that the scenes of agents stopping people in public in Minneapolis have played a significant role in 6 in 10 Americans deciding that Trump’s immigration enforcement has gone “too far.”

    Due process

    Democrats have cried foul that the Trump administration has said it can enter someone’s home without a judicial warrant — instead using only an easier-to-obtain administrative warrant, which the executive branch itself provides.

    And they’ve also pushed to codify due process in other ways, given how much the Trump administration has sought to accelerate deportations, despite a record of mistakes on this front.

    But House Speaker Mike Johnson has called requiring judicial warrants “an unworkable proposal.” And the Trump administration has repeatedly argued that undocumented migrants shouldn’t get the same due process as citizens.

    What polls show: It seems Americans do believe people targeted by ICE should have the right to sufficiently challenge their deportations.

    A Reuters-Ipsos poll in July showed Americans disagreed 50%-37% with the idea that suspected undocumented migrants aren’t entitled to due process.

    And a Public Religion Research Institute poll in May showed Americans by a 61%-37% margin opposed deporting people to foreign prisons without due process, as the Trump administration has done.

    Masks and body cameras

    Two ICE agents drive by a vigil near the site where Renee Good was killed in Minneapolis, on January 14.

    Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

    Body cameras appear to be a consensus issue, with a recent Quinnipiac University poll showing 92% said they should be required. DHS recently announced that agents would wear them.

    ICE agents’ ability to wear masks is a more contentious debate between the parties. Democrats warn they give agents a sense of impunity, while the administration has said they are important to prevent “doxxing,” or sharing the agents’ personal information, which can lead to them being targeted.

    But if the American people decided, the masks would be out.

    The Quinnipiac poll showed registered voters said 61%-35% that masks shouldn’t be permitted. And the NBC poll showed 63% of Americans disapproved of masks. Notably, about twice as many strongly opposed masks (49%) as strongly approved of them (24%).

    Preventing racial profiling

    Republicans have argued that recent Supreme Court rulings have allowed immigration enforcement to target people based on how they look or what language they speak.

    Regardless, that doesn’t mean Americans are a fan of the policy. A Pew poll last month found 72% of Americans said it was unacceptable for immigration officers to use someone’s looks or language as a reason to check their immigration status.

    A much-shared video from Minneapolis showed a Border Patrol agent telling a man he asked for his paperwork “because of your accent.” And local police chiefs have cited possible instances of racial profiling, which DHS has denied.

    Increasing standards for officers

    The administration has rapidly expanded ICE thanks to an explosion of funding in Trump’s big agenda bill last year. It quickly became the highest funded federal law enforcement agency, by far.

    And Democrats have long worried that this could create an influx of insufficiently trained officers.

    It’s difficult to measure how Americans feel about this specifically. But a Reuters-Ipsos poll this month showed 80% of Americans said training and conduct standards were “extremely” (57%) or “very” (23%) important.

    Uniform code of conduct

    Federal agents pin a protester to the ground anspray a chemical irritant into his face, in Minneapolis on January 21.

    Richard Tsong-Taatarii/The Minnesota Star Tribune/Getty Images

    Democrats are pushing to create a new system for accountability for immigration enforcement. And Americans have indicated they are interested in increased oversight.

    Polling has repeatedly shown they don’t trust the administration to deliver that accountability — especially after it clearly sought to avoid a full-fledged investigation of the ICE officer who shot Good. (The administration has indicated it would conduct a more substantial investigation of Pretti’s death, after bipartisan calls for that.)

    An Ipsos poll last month, after Good’s killing, showed Americans said 59%-39% that they weren’t confident the investigation would be fair.

    Likewise, the Quinnipiac poll showed Americans said 61%-25% that the administration hadn’t given an honest account of Pretti’s killing.

    And a whopping 80% said there should be an “independent” investigation. Even a majority of Republicans (56%) supported that.

    Immigration Federal agencies Election polls National security

  • 白宫动用国际开发署资金作安保开支


    发布/2026年2月13日 23:51

    2025年10月21日，美国管理和预算办公室（OMB）主任拉塞尔·沃特出席特朗普在白宫主持的玫瑰园俱乐部午餐会。 （路透社）

    路透社看到的三份文件显示，白宫预算办公室正在动用美国前对外援助机构美国国际开发署的数以百万美元计的资金，为总统特朗普的预算主管拉塞尔·沃特支付安保费用。

    沃特（Russell Vought ）是政府改革的策划者之一，此次改革已导致数千个联邦政府职位裁减。

    文件显示，沃特领导的白宫管理和预算办公室（OMB）正从美国国际开发署（USAID）剩余的运营经费中拨出1500万美元（近1895万新元），用于支付美国法警署为沃特提供的安保服务，直至2026年底。

    一名知情人士透露，沃特的安保团队由十几名美国法警组成，但路透社无法独立证实这一说法。OMB没有安排沃特接受采访。

    美国法警署没有就沃特一事发表评论，称其不会透露受保护人员的身份，但“通常会向受保护机构申请报销”。

    针对国际开发署资金的使用情况，白宫管理和预算办公室发言人雷切尔·考利在电子邮件中答道：“我们将继续使用由该署长监管的三个机构的可用资金来保护他。”

    她显然指的是OMB、USAID和消费者金融保护局（CFPB），沃特目前担任CFPB的代理局长。

    去年，沃特曾担任USAID代理局长近90天，之后他的副手于11月接任。根据一份此前未公开的文件，他目前仍是这个几乎已经解散的机构的高级顾问。

    考利没有透露沃特安保费用的细节，但她没有否认USAID的资金用于支付他美国法警安保人员的费用。

    文件：白宫动用国际开发署资金作安保开支

    发布/2026年2月13日 23:51

    2025年10月21日，美国管理和预算办公室（OMB）主任拉塞尔·沃特出席特朗普在白宫主持的玫瑰园俱乐部午餐会。 （路透社）

    路透社看到的三份文件显示，白宫预算办公室正在动用美国前对外援助机构美国国际开发署的数以百万美元计的资金，为总统特朗普的预算主管拉塞尔·沃特支付安保费用。

    沃特（Russell Vought ）是政府改革的策划者之一，此次改革已导致数千个联邦政府职位裁减。

    文件显示，沃特领导的白宫管理和预算办公室（OMB）正从美国国际开发署（USAID）剩余的运营经费中拨出1500万美元（近1895万新元），用于支付美国法警署为沃特提供的安保服务，直至2026年底。

    一名知情人士透露，沃特的安保团队由十几名美国法警组成，但路透社无法独立证实这一说法。OMB没有安排沃特接受采访。

    美国法警署没有就沃特一事发表评论，称其不会透露受保护人员的身份，但“通常会向受保护机构申请报销”。

    针对国际开发署资金的使用情况，白宫管理和预算办公室发言人雷切尔·考利在电子邮件中答道：“我们将继续使用由该署长监管的三个机构的可用资金来保护他。”

    她显然指的是OMB、USAID和消费者金融保护局（CFPB），沃特目前担任CFPB的代理局长。

    去年，沃特曾担任USAID代理局长近90天，之后他的副手于11月接任。根据一份此前未公开的文件，他目前仍是这个几乎已经解散的机构的高级顾问。

    考利没有透露沃特安保费用的细节，但她没有否认USAID的资金用于支付他美国法警安保人员的费用。

  • 白宫动用国际开发署资金作安保开支


    发布/2026年2月13日 23:51

    路透社看到的三份文件显示，白宫预算办公室正在动用美国前对外援助机构美国国际开发署的数以百万美元计的资金，为总统特朗普的预算主管拉塞尔·沃特支付安保费用。

    沃特（Russell Vought ）是政府改革的策划者之一，此次改革已导致数千个联邦政府职位裁减。

    文件显示，沃特领导的白宫管理和预算办公室（OMB）正从美国国际开发署（USAID）剩余的运营经费中拨出1500万美元（近1895万新元），用于支付美国法警署为沃特提供的安保服务，直至2026年底。

    一名知情人士透露，沃特的安保团队由十几名美国法警组成，但路透社无法独立证实这一说法。OMB没有安排沃特接受采访。

    美国法警署没有就沃特一事发表评论，称其不会透露受保护人员的身份，但“通常会向受保护机构申请报销”。

    针对国际开发署资金的使用情况，白宫管理和预算办公室发言人雷切尔·考利在电子邮件中答道：“我们将继续使用由该署长监管的三个机构的可用资金来保护他。”

    她显然指的是OMB、USAID和消费者金融保护局（CFPB），沃特目前担任CFPB的代理局长。

    去年，沃特曾担任USAID代理局长近90天，之后他的副手于11月接任。根据一份此前未公开的文件，他目前仍是这个几乎已经解散的机构的高级顾问。

    考利没有透露沃特安保费用的细节，但她没有否认USAID的资金用于支付他美国法警安保人员的费用。

    文件：白宫动用国际开发署资金作安保开支

    发布/2026年2月13日 23:51

    路透社看到的三份文件显示，白宫预算办公室正在动用美国前对外援助机构美国国际开发署的数以百万美元计的资金，为总统特朗普的预算主管拉塞尔·沃特支付安保费用。

    沃特（Russell Vought ）是政府改革的策划者之一，此次改革已导致数千个联邦政府职位裁减。

    文件显示，沃特领导的白宫管理和预算办公室（OMB）正从美国国际开发署（USAID）剩余的运营经费中拨出1500万美元（近1895万新元），用于支付美国法警署为沃特提供的安保服务，直至2026年底。

    一名知情人士透露，沃特的安保团队由十几名美国法警组成，但路透社无法独立证实这一说法。OMB没有安排沃特接受采访。

    美国法警署没有就沃特一事发表评论，称其不会透露受保护人员的身份，但“通常会向受保护机构申请报销”。

    针对国际开发署资金的使用情况，白宫管理和预算办公室发言人雷切尔·考利在电子邮件中答道：“我们将继续使用由该署长监管的三个机构的可用资金来保护他。”

    她显然指的是OMB、USAID和消费者金融保护局（CFPB），沃特目前担任CFPB的代理局长。

    去年，沃特曾担任USAID代理局长近90天，之后他的副手于11月接任。根据一份此前未公开的文件，他目前仍是这个几乎已经解散的机构的高级顾问。

    考利没有透露沃特安保费用的细节，但她没有否认USAID的资金用于支付他美国法警安保人员的费用。

  • 马里兰州州长韦斯·摩尔称拜登在移民问题上”做得不够”，但抨击特朗普的镇压政策


    2026年2月13日 / 美国东部时间下午1:34 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    马里兰州州长韦斯·摩尔告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻，在全国就联邦执法问题展开激烈辩论之际，移民问题是美国”长期回避的问题”。

    虽然他公开谴责特朗普政府的移民政策是”残忍和鲁莽的政治议程”，但他告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻高级记者诺拉·奥唐奈，前总统乔·拜登”本不该有这样的权力”。

    “我们本可以做得更多。我认为，没有人会否认，在拜登总统任内，移民问题并没有得到妥善解决，”他在一场市政厅会议上说，该会议于美国东部时间和太平洋时间周日晚上8点在哥伦比亚广播公司播出，紧随《60分钟》节目之后。

    在拜登政府期间，美国边境巡逻队在南部边境抓获的移民人数创历史新高，官员们正努力应对人道主义、政治和运营危机。在拜登任期内的某些时候，该机构每天记录数千起抓捕事件，到2023年底的高峰日，总数攀升至约10,000人。

    这就是为什么特朗普将移民问题作为其2024年总统竞选的核心内容，承诺全面改革美国移民政策并进行美国历史上最大规模的驱逐行动。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻在10月报道称，2025财年美国与墨西哥边境的非法越境人数降至50多年来的最低年度水平。

    尽管移民问题在2024年选民的首要问题中名列前茅，但对特朗普政府驱逐行动的支持率已开始下降，最近的民调显示，更多美国人认为美国移民和海关执法局（ICE）的行动”过于严厉”。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻获得的美国国土安全部内部文件显示，在特朗普上任第一年，被ICE逮捕的人中有不到14%有暴力犯罪记录。

    摩尔表示，他认为没有任何一届政府能够完全制定出有效的移民制度，而只有国会才能解决这个问题。

    “这对我来说很令人沮丧，现在的国会就是这样，我觉得我们只是在眼睁睁看着责任被不断放弃，”他说。

    由于共和党人控制着白宫和参众两院，摩尔暗示，如果特朗普推动的话，他可能会在”下周”就有一项全面的移民改革法案”摆在他的办公桌上”。”因为他们有足够的票数。但这并没有发生，”他说。

    *

    观看哥伦比亚广播公司新闻《重要事务》：由诺拉·奥唐奈主持的韦斯·摩尔州长市政厅会议，于美国东部时间和太平洋时间周日晚上8点播出，紧随哥伦比亚广播公司《60分钟》节目之后。

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/gov-wes-moore-biden-immigration-policies/

    Gov. Wes Moore argues Biden “needed to do more” on immigration but blasts Trump’s crackdown

    February 13, 2026 / 1:34 PM EST / CBS News

    Maryland Gov. Wes Moore told CBS News immigration is an issue the country has “punted on for a very long time” amid the nation’s heated debate over federal enforcement.

    While he has publicly condemned the Trump administration’s immigration policies as a “cruel and reckless political agenda,” he told CBS News senior correspondent Norah O’Donnell that former President Joe Biden “did not have this right.”

    “We needed to do more. That, I don’t think anyone can argue that we had the system worked out under President Biden – that immigration was worked out,” he said during a town hall, airing Sunday at 8 p.m. ET/PT on CBS, right after 60 Minutes.

    During the Biden administration, the southern border saw record numbers of migrant apprehensions by Border Patrol, as officials grappled with a humanitarian, political and operational crisis. At points during Biden’s tenure, the agency recorded thousands of apprehensions per day, with totals climbing to around 10,000 on peak days in late 2023.

    That’s why Mr. Trump made immigration a central part of his 2024 presidential campaign, pledging a sweeping overhaul of U.S. immigration policy and the largest deportation in the nation’s history. The tally of unlawful crossings along the U.S.-Mexico border in fiscal year 2025 dropped to the lowest annual level in more than five decades, CBS News reported in October.

    While voters ranked immigration among their top issues in 2024, support for the Trump administration’s deportation efforts has started to decline and recent polls show more Americans view ICE’s operations as “too tough.” An internal Department of Homeland Security document obtained by CBS News shows less than 14% of those arrested by ICE in Trump’s first year back in office had violent criminal records.

    Moore said he would argue that no administration has ever fully figured out an effective system, and that only Congress can fix it.

    “And this is the frustrating thing for me with this Congress right now, where I feel we are just watching a continued abdication of responsibility,” he said.

    With Republicans controlling the White House and both chambers of Congress, Moore suggested that Trump could have a comprehensive immigration reform bill “on his desk next week” if he pushed for it. “Because they have the votes. And that’s not happening,” he said.

    *

    Watch CBS News Things That Matter: A Town Hall with Governor Wes Moore, moderated by Norah O’Donnell on Sunday at 8 p.m. ET/PT, right after 60 Minutes on CBS.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/gov-wes-moore-biden-immigration-policies/

  • MAGA vs MAGA：佐治亚州选举暴露特朗普支持者阵营内部分歧


    2026年2月13日 上午11:09 UTC / 路透社

    佐治亚州道尔顿，2月13日（路透社） – 唐纳德·特朗普总统或许本以为，他对一位当地检察官的支持会在取代美国众议员玛乔丽·泰勒·格林的竞选中扫清共和党对手。然而，仍有超过十几名共和党人在角逐，使得佐治亚州这个极度保守的地区成为特朗普对其“让美国再次伟大”（MAGA）运动掌控力的年度选举考验场。

    2月4日，特朗普表示 Clay Fuller 将是 MAGA 的火炬手并给予支持后，这位曾在佐治亚州西北部四个县担任地方检察官的前官员成为了推定领先者。

    然而，特朗普的背书并未阻止其他14名共和党候选人继续角逐3月10日的特别选举（周一将开始提前投票）。此外，还有三名民主党候选人及一名独立候选人参与竞争。

    几位共和党候选人将自己塑造为特朗普右翼民粹主义的真正捍卫者，试图填补格林因1月与总统激烈分裂后辞职而留下的权力真空。

    佐治亚州第14国会选区，从亚特兰大郊区延伸至田纳西州边境的蓝领走廊，自2020年格林以压倒性优势胜选并迅速成为该运动最直言不讳的全国性人物之一后，已成为 MAGA 堡垒。如今，随着格林退选，该选区选民正纠结于共和党未来走向以及谁能领导它。

    对22名选民的采访显示，这场竞选仍充满变数。大多数共和党人表示尚未确定支持哪位候选人，特朗普的单一背书不会决定他们的投票。

    “我是特朗普的支持者，尊重他的意见，但他不住在这个选区，”本周在肯尼索市参加候选人论坛的选民 John Burdette 表示，“我认为我们对谁最能代表我们有更好的判断。”

    格林选区争夺 MAGA 旗手地位的斗争凸显了该运动在全国范围内的演变。尽管对特朗普的忠诚仍是核心特征，但对“MAGA”含义的共识正逐渐瓦解——如今这一标签涵盖了更多元的联盟。

    这些新兴分歧对共和党在11月中期选举中维持国会控制权构成风险，可能为民主党在竞争激烈的选区利用共和党内部矛盾创造机会。

    政治观察家称，由于共和党候选人分散选票，领先的民主党候选人 Shawn Harris 可能获得足够支持进入4月7日的决选（若无人获得多数票）。

    2024年哈里斯以35.6%的得票率输给格林（64.4%），其表现将被关注，以观察民主党能否延续在特别选举中胜选的势头，尽管彻底获胜被视为极不可能。

    空军退伍军人 Fuller 表示，他计划将重点放在阿巴拉契亚山麓延伸的贫困农村社区的经济发展上。他还誓言摒弃格林那种以阴谋论和网络攻击特朗普“敌人”为特征的好斗风格，这种风格曾使该选区备受关注。

    “在需要的时候我也会使用强硬言辞，”他在竞选活动后告诉路透社，“但我有自己的立场。我认为选民不想再看到那种风格。”

    “神、枪、特朗普”

    不过，Fuller 有时也会用煽动性言论支持特朗普的议程。

    1月24日——当天联邦移民局人员在明尼阿波利斯枪杀护士 Alex Pretti——他在 X 平台承诺，若当选将提名所有移民和海关执法局（ICE）特工获得总统自由勋章，并推动将该机构预算增加两倍。

    但在多年支持总统的候选人中，没有人比 Colton Moore 更激进——这位极右翼前州参议员自称“特朗普的头号捍卫者”，竞选口号为“神、枪、特朗普”。

    作为特朗普2020年选举被窃取论的长期支持者，Moore 多次与佐治亚州共和党领导层发生冲突。

    81岁的共和党选民 Charles Stoker 表示，这种对抗性做法正是吸引渴望挑战建制派的基层保守派的关键。他指出，尽管获得特朗普背书，佐治亚州多名共和党人在2022年中期选举中失利。

    “特朗普总统得到了糟糕的建议，”他表达了对 Fuller 获得支持的失望，“方向应该由民众自下而上决定。”

    尽管未获特朗普背书，Moore 已获得前国家安全顾问 Michael Flynn、前佛罗里达州议员 Matt Gaetz 以及代表共和党极右翼的佐治亚州共和党大会（GRA）的支持。

    GRA 主席 Nathaniel Darnell 对路透社表示：“特朗普总统几年后可能会卸任，我们需要确保有人真正为选区利益行事，我信任 Moore 而非 Fuller。”

    候选人之间的主要分歧在于风格而非实质内容。一些人拥护定义特朗普主义的好斗风格，另一些人则呼吁政治回归更文明、注重共识的路线。

    Meg Strickland （曾投票支持特朗普）是少数自称为温和派的候选人之一。她认为共和党应回归小政府传统，摒弃尖酸的个人政治，“我认为特朗普不是真正的保守派，希望我们能重回正轨。”

    哈里斯的胜算渺茫，但或给共和党传递警告

    以“回归常态”为竞选口号的 Strickland 承认，她在特朗普2024年以68%得票率拿下的选区中，获胜概率极低。

    但她认为共和党误判了时机，指出选民对联邦移民局强硬手段的反弹以及她竞选活动中凸显的生活成本压力。

    59岁的牧场主兼退休准将 Harris 将争取不满的共和党选民作为核心策略，承诺降低普通工人生活成本、扩大平价医疗可及性。

    哈里斯拥有120万美元竞选资金，他称自己的立场与格林（自与特朗普决裂后转向帮助工薪阶层、遏制有毒政治和解决国债）的立场有重叠。

    “玛乔丽·泰勒·格林已经回归到传统共和党人的立场，她的话术和我上次与她竞争时的主张一致，”哈里斯表示。

    1月最后一周（特朗普背书前）由 Quantus Insights 对729名注册共和党人进行的民调显示，Moore 和 Fuller 分别以13.4%和12.6%领先，超三分之一受访者未决定支持谁。

    北佐治亚大学政治学教授 Nathan Price 表示，这场竞选的不确定性反映了共和党和 MAGA 运动正处于转型期。

    “随着特朗普任期进入第六年，或许政党开始超越他，思考未来的方向，”他说。

    Jayla Whitfield-Anderson、Rich McKay 和 Nathan Layne 报道，Ross Colvin 和 Alistair Bell 编辑

    MAGA vs MAGA: Georgia election exposes divisions in Trump’s base

    February 13, 2026 11:09 AM UTC / Reuters

    DALTON, Georgia, Feb 13 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump may have expected his endorsement of a local prosecutor in the race to replace U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene to clear the Republican field. Instead, more than a dozen Republicans are still competing, turning this deeply conservative corner of Georgia into an election-year test of Trump’s hold on his Make America Great Again movement.

    Clay Fuller, the former district attorney for four counties in northwest Georgia, became the presumptive frontrunner after Trump threw his support behind him on February 4, describing him as a torchbearer of MAGA.

    Trump’s endorsement, however, has not deterred 14 other Republican candidates from pressing ahead in the March 10 special election, with early voting to start on Monday. Three Democratic candidates and one independent are also competing.

    Several of the Republican candidates are casting themselves as the true champions of Trump’s right-wing populism, vying to fill the vacuum left by Greene, who resigned her congressional seat in January after a bitter split with the president.

    Georgia’s 14th Congressional District, a mostly blue-collar corridor from Atlanta’s exurbs up to the Tennessee border, has established itself as a MAGA stronghold since Greene swept to victory in 2020 and quickly became one of the movement’s most outspoken national figures. Now, with Greene stepping aside, the district’s voters are grappling with what comes next for the party and who should lead it.

    Interviews with 22 voters suggest the race remains fluid. Most Republicans said they had not settled on a candidate and that Trump’s endorsement alone won’t decide their vote.

    “I’m a Trump supporter, and I respect his opinion, but he doesn’t live in this district,” said John Burdette, a voter who attended a candidate forum this week in the city of Kennesaw. “I think we have a better perspective on who is best to represent us.”

    The fight to claim the mantle of MAGA standard-bearer in Greene’s district highlights how the movement nationally is evolving. While fealty to Trump is still the distinct denominator, there is increasingly less agreement on what it means to be “MAGA”, a label that now covers a far more diverse coalition.

    These emerging divisions pose a risk for Republicans’ control of Congress in November’s midterm elections, creating potential openings for Democrats to take advantage of any infighting in competitive districts.

    With Republicans splitting votes, political observers say the leading Democratic candidate, Shawn Harris, could gain enough support to make a runoff, set for April 7 if no candidate secures a majority.

    After losing to Greene by 64.4%–35.6% in 2024, his performance will be watched to see if Democrats can sustain their recent streak of outperforming in special elections, though outright victory is seen as highly unlikely.

    A U.S. Air Force veteran, Fuller said he aims to focus on bringing economic development to the district’s poorer rural communities stretching across the foothills of Appalachia. He also vowed to move past Greene’s combative style, marked by conspiracy-mongering and online attacks on Trump’s perceived enemies that drew scrutiny to the district.

    “I’ve got the gear for fire and brimstone when the situation calls for it,” he told Reuters after a campaign event. “But I’m my own man. I don’t think the voters want that style again.”

    ‘GOD, GUNS, TRUMP’

    Still, Fuller does sometimes use inflammatory rhetoric in support of Trump’s agenda.

    On January 24 – the same day federal immigration officers shot and killed nurse Alex Pretti in Minneapolis – he pledged in a post on X that, if elected, he would nominate all Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents for the Presidential Medal of Freedom and push to triple the agency’s budget.

    But no candidate in the race has been as fiery or aggressive in backing the president over the years as Colton Moore, a hard-right former state senator who calls himself “Trump’s #1 Defender” and is running under the slogan “GOD. GUNS. TRUMP.”

    A longtime champion of Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was stolen, Moore has repeatedly clashed with Georgia’s Republican leadership.

    To Charles Stoker, an 81-year-old Republican voter, that confrontational approach is precisely what resonates with grassroots conservatives eager to challenge the establishment. He noted that a string of Georgia Republicans lost their races in the 2022 midterms despite being endorsed by Trump.

    “President Trump has been getting bad advice,” he said, voicing disappointment with the Fuller endorsement. “Directions need to come from the people upward.”

    Though he missed out on Trump’s endorsement, Moore has secured backing from former national security adviser Michael Flynn, former Florida congressman Matt Gaetz and the Georgia Republican Assembly, a group that represents the party’s far-right wing.

    “President Trump’s going to be gone in a few years,” GRA President Nathaniel Darnell told Reuters, arguing that Moore, not Fuller, could be trusted to work in the district’s best interests.

    The main differences between candidates are on style rather than substance. Some candidates have embraced the combative approach that defines Trumpism, while some have called for more civility and consensus-building in politics.

    Meg Strickland, who voted for Trump, is one of the few self-described moderates in the race. She says the party should chart a new course that would see it return to its small-government roots and move away from caustic, personality-driven politics.

    “I don’t think that Trump is a true conservative and I hope that we can get back there,” said the 39-year-old travel consultant and mother of three.

    LONG ODDS FOR HARRIS, BUT COULD SEND REPUBLICANS A MESSAGE

    Strickland, running on a “return to normal” message, acknowledges the steep odds she faces in a district Trump carried with 68% of the vote in 2024.

    But she believes Republicans are misreading the moment, pointing to the voter backlash to aggressive tactics by federal immigration agents and the cost-of-living squeeze she says dominates her campaign stops.

    Harris, a 59-year-old cattle farmer and retired brigadier general, has made courting disaffected Republican voters a central focus of his Democratic candidacy, aiming to win them over with a message centered on lowering costs for everyday workers and expanding access to affordable healthcare.

    Harris, who has $1.2 million on hand to campaign, said he sees overlap between his positions and Greene’s since her break with Trump and shift in focus to helping working Americans, curbing toxic politics and tackling the national debt.

    “Marjorie Taylor Greene is a Republican that has moved back into what the old Republicans were,” Harris said. “Her talking points are the same talking points that I had when I ran against her the last time.”

    A Quantus Insights poll of 729 registered Republicans conducted in the last week of January, before Trump’s endorsement, pointed to a wide-open race, with Moore and Fuller at the top with 13.4% and 12.6% support, and more than a third of respondents undecided.

    Nathan Price, a political science professor at the University of North Georgia, said the race’s fluidity reflects a Republican Party and a MAGA movement in transition.

    “I think you’re starting to see perhaps the party looking beyond him a little bit as he gets into the sixth year and maybe starting to think about the future of the party,” he said.

    Reporting by Jayla Whitfield-Anderson, Rich McKay and Nathan Layne, editing by Ross Colvin and Alistair Bell

    节点运行失败

  • 消息人士称，特朗普预计将出席在迈阿密举行的沙特未来投资倡议会议


    2026年2月13日 美国东部时间上午9:04 / 路透社

    作者：哈迪勒·阿尔·赛耶格（Hadeel Al Sayegh）和蒂姆尔·阿扎里（Timour Azhari）

    节点运行失败

    • 摘要
    • 特朗普的参与凸显了海湾地区经济合作关系
    • 沙特阿拉伯寻求私营部门对”愿景2030″计划的合作
    • 沙特与阿联酋在地区经济主导权争夺中竞争加剧

    迪拜/利雅得，2月13日（路透社） – 知情人士透露，美国总统唐纳德·特朗普预计将出席在迈阿密举行的沙特阿拉伯”未来投资倡议”（FII）会议，这是他重返白宫后连续第二次出席该活动。

    两人表示，特朗普预计将出席3月26日至29日举行的活动首日由沙特主权财富基金（PIF） governor Yasir Al-Rumayyan举办的晚宴。因未获授权公开发言，他们要求匿名。

    路透社《内部追踪》（Inside Track）通讯是您了解全球体育界重大赛事的必备指南。点击此处注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续

    沙特未来投资倡议（FII）研究所、沙特政府和白宫未立即回应置评请求。

    特朗普参与FII平台，凸显了其政府对海湾地区经济合作的重视。

    沙特王储与特朗普11月会面期间，沙特与美国敲定了一系列投资和国防协议，利雅得承诺对美投资规模从特朗普5月访沙时提出的6000亿美元大幅提升至1万亿美元。

    沙特阿拉伯”愿景2030″转向私营部门

    此次高规格出席之际，沙特正重新调整其宏伟的”愿景2030″经济转型计划，此前该计划依赖的大型项目因资金短缺而面临调整。

    沙特官员在最初计划严重依赖政府资金后，正日益转向寻求私营部门的支持与合作。

    在沙特重新定位经济议程之际，FII迈阿密活动将为其吸引北美和南美商界领袖及投资者提供平台。

    此次活动同时也在沙特与阿联酋之间日益加深的竞争背景下举行。这两个传统上亲密的海湾盟友，因地区经济竞争和战略优先事项日益产生分歧。

    两国正争夺中东主要商业和金融中心地位，阿联酋在金融、科技等领域的快速崛起，与沙特”愿景2030″计划下的自身雄心产生摩擦。FII与阿布扎比的米尔肯研究所全球会议（5月在洛杉矶举行）形成竞争。

    通常每年秋季在利雅得举行的主要FII会议被称为”沙漠中的达沃斯”，已成为沙特展示其经济愿景并吸引全球投资的旗舰活动。

    该组织已将活动从利雅得扩展至其他主要城市。

    报道：哈迪勒·阿尔·赛耶格（Hadeel Al Sayegh）和蒂姆尔·阿扎里（Timour Azhari）；编辑：莎伦·辛格尔顿（Sharon Singleton）

    我们的标准：路透社信托原则。点击此处查看。

    Trump expected to attend Saudi FII conference in Miami, sources say

    February 13, 2026 9:04 AM UTC / Reuters

    By Hadeel Al Sayegh and Timour Azhari

    节点运行失败

    U.S. President Donald Trump looks on as he makes an announcement on the repeal of a scientific finding that greenhouse gas emissions endanger human health, removing the legal basis for federal climate regulations, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 12, 2026. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Trump’s engagement highlights Gulf economic partnerships
    • Saudi Arabia seeks private sector collaboration for Vision 2030
    • Saudi-UAE rivalry intensifies over regional economic dominance

    DUBAI/RIYADH, Feb 13 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to attend Saudi Arabia’s Future Investment Initiative conference in Miami, marking his second consecutive appearance at the event since returning to the White House, people familiar with the matter said.

    Trump is expected to attend a dinner on the first day hosted by Yasir Al-Rumayyan, governor of Saudi Arabian sovereign wealth fund PIF, two people said, asking not to be identified as they were not authorized to speak publicly. The event takes place from March 26-29.

    The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad

    The FII Institute, the Saudi government and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Trump’s engagement with the FII platform underscores the importance his administration places on Gulf economic partnerships.

    Saudi Arabia and the U.S. finalised a series of investment and defense agreements during the crown prince’s meeting with Trump in November, with Riyadh boosting its commitment to invest in the United States to $1 trillion – expanding significantly from the $600 billion in deals outlined during Trump’s visit to the kingdom in May.

    SAUDI ARABIA’S VISION 2030 PIVOTS TO PRIVATE SECTOR

    The potential high-profile attendance comes as Saudi Arabia recalibrates its ambitious Vision 2030 economic transformation program amid a shortage of funding for mega-projects that were part of the kingdom’s wider diversification efforts.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Saudi officials have increasingly pivoted toward securing buy-in and collaboration from the private sector after initial plans relied heavily on government funding.

    The FII Miami event would provide a platform for Saudi Arabia to court North and South American business leaders and investors at a time when the kingdom is repositioning its economic agenda.

    The gathering also takes place against a backdrop of deepening rivalry between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, traditionally close Gulf allies, who have increasingly found themselves at odds over regional economic competition and strategic priorities.

    The two nations have been vying for position as the Middle East’s premier business and financial hub, with the UAE’s rapid rise in sectors from finance to technology creating friction with Saudi Arabia’s own ambitions under Vision 2030. FII competes with Abu Dhabi’s Milken Institute Global Conference, which takes place in Los Angeles in May.

    The main FII conference, usually held each fall in Riyadh and dubbed “Davos in the Desert,” has become a flagship event for Saudi Arabia to showcase its economic vision and attract global investment.

    The organization has expanded beyond Riyadh to host events in other major cities.

    Reporting by Hadeel Al Sayegh and Timour Azhari; Editing by Sharon Singleton

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 葡萄牙通过法案 限制青少年使用社交媒体 | 联合早报


    发布时间：2026年2月13日 17:18 | 来源：联合早报

    葡萄牙议会通过法案，限制16岁以下儿童和青少年访问在线平台和社交媒体。

    来自葡萄牙执政党社会民主党（PSD）的法案起草人指出，这项措施旨在保护儿童免受网络欺凌、有害内容以及不法分子的侵害。

    路透社报道，法案星期四（2月12日）以148票赞成、69票反对、13票弃权获得通过。

    家长将使用名为“数码移动密钥”（DMK）的公共系统来授予孩子访问权限，该系统也有助于执行现有的禁令，禁止13岁以下儿童访问数码社交媒体、视频和图片分享平台或在线博彩网站。技术提供商也必须落实与DMK兼容的年龄验证系统。

    违反该法案的罚款金额根据企业规模而定，从2万欧元到200万欧元（3万至300万新元）不等；个人违规的罚款金额则从1万欧元到25万欧元不等。

    中国新闻社引述《晨邮报》称，尽管各党派一致认同社交媒体对儿童构成风险，但在解决方案上存在分歧。目前，该法案仍需提交专门委员会进行详细讨论。

    近期，包括西班牙、希腊、英国和法国在内的一些国家，出于对社交媒体可能对儿童产生负面影响的担忧，正酝酿采取更严格的监管力度。此前，澳大利亚于去年12月成为首个禁止16岁以下未成年人访问此类平台的国家。

    葡萄牙通过法案 限制青少年使用社交媒体 | 联合早报

    发布时间：2026年2月13日 17:18 | 来源：联合早报

    葡萄牙议会通过法案，限制16岁以下儿童和青少年访问在线平台和社交媒体。

    来自葡萄牙执政党社会民主党（PSD）的法案起草人指出，这项措施旨在保护儿童免受网络欺凌、有害内容以及不法分子的侵害。

    路透社报道，法案星期四（2月12日）以148票赞成、69票反对、13票弃权获得通过。

    家长将使用名为“数码移动密钥”（DMK）的公共系统来授予孩子访问权限，该系统也有助于执行现有的禁令，禁止13岁以下儿童访问数码社交媒体、视频和图片分享平台或在线博彩网站。技术提供商也必须落实与DMK兼容的年龄验证系统。

    违反该法案的罚款金额根据企业规模而定，从2万欧元到200万欧元（3万至300万新元）不等；个人违规的罚款金额则从1万欧元到25万欧元不等。

    中国新闻社引述《晨邮报》称，尽管各党派一致认同社交媒体对儿童构成风险，但在解决方案上存在分歧。目前，该法案仍需提交专门委员会进行详细讨论。

    近期，包括西班牙、希腊、英国和法国在内的一些国家，出于对社交媒体可能对儿童产生负面影响的担忧，正酝酿采取更严格的监管力度。此前，澳大利亚于去年12月成为首个禁止16岁以下未成年人访问此类平台的国家。

  • 泰国首相：为泰党将加入泰自豪党领导的联合政府 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年2月13日 18:00

    泰国首相阿努廷说，在星期天大选中以较大优势获胜的泰自豪党将与排名第三的为泰党组成联合政府。

    法新社引述阿努廷星期五（2月13日）宣布的消息说：“我们很荣幸今天为泰党的高层领导能够莅临。虽然选举结果尚未正式确认，但我们已达成共识，为泰党将按计划支持我们领导联合政府。”

    根据路透社基于选举委员会数据的计算，阿努廷领导的泰自豪党在星期天的大选中意外获胜，在500个议席的众议院中赢得193席，紧随其后的是获得118席的改革派人民党和获得74席的民粹主义政党为泰党。

    目前身陷囹圄的亿万富翁前首相达信支持的为泰党，将使阿努廷在议会中获得绝对多数席位，这可能为组建稳定的联合政府铺平道路。

    阿努廷在与为泰党领导人会谈后告诉记者：“我们将共同组建政府，治理国家，为国家谋福祉。”

    泰自豪党曾是为泰党领导的执政联盟成员，联盟在2023年大选后上台执政。但去年6月，在时任首相佩通坦与柬埔寨前领导人洪森的通话泄露后，泰自豪党退出联盟。

    佩通坦随后被法院下令解职，为阿努廷出任首相铺平了道路。

    阿努廷说：“请大家消除过去的误会。我们希望携手合作，共同治理国家。”

    泰国首相：为泰党将加入泰自豪党领导的联合政府 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年2月13日 18:00

    泰国首相阿努廷说，在星期天大选中以较大优势获胜的泰自豪党将与排名第三的为泰党组成联合政府。

    法新社引述阿努廷星期五（2月13日）宣布的消息说：“我们很荣幸今天为泰党的高层领导能够莅临。虽然选举结果尚未正式确认，但我们已达成共识，为泰党将按计划支持我们领导联合政府。”

    根据路透社基于选举委员会数据的计算，阿努廷领导的泰自豪党在星期天的大选中意外获胜，在500个议席的众议院中赢得193席，紧随其后的是获得118席的改革派人民党和获得74席的民粹主义政党为泰党。

    目前身陷囹圄的亿万富翁前首相达信支持的为泰党，将使阿努廷在议会中获得绝对多数席位，这可能为组建稳定的联合政府铺平道路。

    阿努廷在与为泰党领导人会谈后告诉记者：“我们将共同组建政府，治理国家，为国家谋福祉。”

    泰自豪党曾是为泰党领导的执政联盟成员，联盟在2023年大选后上台执政。但去年6月，在时任首相佩通坦与柬埔寨前领导人洪森的通话泄露后，泰自豪党退出联盟。

    佩通坦随后被法院下令解职，为阿努廷出任首相铺平了道路。

    阿努廷说：“请大家消除过去的误会。我们希望携手合作，共同治理国家。”

  • 因安全事件停运 德国科隆－波恩机场恢复运营 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年2月13日 18:20

    德国西部科隆－波恩机场（Cologne Bonn Airport）因安全事件暂停运营数小时，数千名旅客受到影响。

    路透社引述德国公共广播公司WDR称，星期五（2月13日）上午的机场停运导致两个航站楼的安检区域人员疏散，原因是新安装的安检设备出现故障。

    据航班追踪网站Flightradar24显示，上午9时刚过（新加坡时间下午4时），飞机开始恢复起飞。

    新华社引述媒体的报道说，科隆警方发言人说，由于一台行李扫描仪出现故障，许多乘客不得不再次接受安全检查。但警方未透露细节。

    科隆－波恩机场是德国客运量第六大的机场，也是联合包裹服务公司（UPS）的区域枢纽。

    节点运行失败

    因安全事件停运 德国科隆－波恩机场恢复运营 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年2月13日 18:20

    德国西部科隆－波恩机场（Cologne Bonn Airport）因安全事件暂停运营数小时，数千名旅客受到影响。

    路透社引述德国公共广播公司WDR称，星期五（2月13日）上午的机场停运导致两个航站楼的安检区域人员疏散，原因是新安装的安检设备出现故障。

    据航班追踪网站Flightradar24显示，上午9时刚过（新加坡时间下午4时），飞机开始恢复起飞。

    新华社引述媒体的报道说，科隆警方发言人说，由于一台行李扫描仪出现故障，许多乘客不得不再次接受安全检查。但警方未透露细节。

    科隆－波恩机场是德国客运量第六大的机场，也是联合包裹服务公司（UPS）的区域枢纽。

    节点运行失败

  • 特朗普：无暇当被告，却有大把时间起诉


    By Tom Hals
    2026年2月13日 上午11:06 UTC 更新于7分钟前

    节点运行失败

    前美国总统唐纳德·特朗普于2026年1月29日在美国华盛顿特区出席纪录片《梅拉尼娅》首映式时发表讲话。路透社/Kylie Cooper 购买授权，新标签页打开

    • 摘要
    • 公司
    • 特朗普长期以来利用诉讼回击批评者
    • 即便身为总统，他仍继续提起民事诉讼
    • 最高法院1997年驳回克林顿的诉讼豁免权请求
    • 特朗普律师提出”临时豁免权规则”

    特拉华州威尔明顿，2月13日（路透社） – 2024年11月特朗普赢得连任后不久，其律师就向特拉华州一名州法官表示，针对他社交媒体公司两位联合创始人提起的诉讼应暂停审理，因为在任总统没有时间处理民事诉讼。

    特朗普的律师请求法官洛里·威尔（Lori Will）”承认一项临时豁免权规则，以保护总统免受州民事诉讼的干扰、分心和骚扰”。原告指控称，他们因成功推出Truth Social平台而未获得约定的报酬。

    每日简讯新闻通讯将最新法律新闻直接发送到您的收件箱，助您开启充满活力的一天。立即注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    但在法官就豁免权问题做出裁决之前，特朗普似乎通过自行对爱荷华州《得梅因纪事报》（Des Moines Register）提起民事诉讼削弱了自己的论点。

    几十年来一直利用诉讼回击批评者的特朗普，随后又以个人名义提起了至少五起诉讼，索赔金额达数千亿美元。

    这些诉讼包括：针对图书出版商企鹅兰登书屋（Penguin Random House）的诽谤诉讼；针对三家新闻机构——《纽约时报》（The New York Times，NYT.N）、新标签页打开、《华尔街日报》（The Wall Street Journal，NWSA.O）、新标签页打开和英国广播公司（BBC）的诽谤诉讼；指控摩根大通（JPMorgan Chase，JPM.N）非法关闭其账户的诉讼；以及指控美国国税局（U.S. Internal Revenue Service）未能阻止其纳税申报单向媒体披露的诉讼。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    这些媒体公司和摩根大通均否认存在不当行为。美国国税局尚未就该诉讼发表评论或在法庭上作出回应。

    最终，威尔法官于9月驳回了针对特朗普的特拉华州案件，但并非基于豁免权理由。

    用特朗普的论点回击他

    一些被他起诉的对象正试图利用这位共和党总统的豁免权主张来反击他，称如果特朗普声称自己太忙而无法应对针对他的诉讼，那么他就不应被允许起诉他人。

    密歇根大学法学院教授理查德·普里默斯（Richard Primus）在谈到特朗普的豁免权立场时表示：”这就好比说，’我们要打棒球，但只有我能击球’。”

    美国最高法院在1997年涉及民主党前总统比尔·克林顿的裁决中就总统民事诉讼豁免权问题作出了裁决，宣布总统不享有豁免权。大法官们允许一名前阿肯色州政府雇员保拉·琼斯（Paula Jones）对克林顿提起诽谤和性骚扰诉讼。

    最高法院在2024年涉及特朗普的裁决中认定，总统在履行公职时对刑事起诉享有广泛豁免权，但该裁决未涉及民事诉讼豁免权问题。

    在特朗普的一起诉讼中，最新的反击方是民调机构安·塞尔泽（Ann Selzer）。2024年12月，特朗普与《得梅因纪事报》及其出版商一同起诉了她，原因是在选举前的一项民调显示其民主党对手卡玛拉·哈里斯在爱荷华州领先，而特朗普最终赢得了该州。

    塞尔泽请求暂停诉讼直至特朗普任期结束，但未获成功。

    被告律师辩称，特朗普有滥用法院推进政治议程的历史，其豁免权主张可能会给他提供一个新的武器来对付媒体。他们表示，特朗普可以在自己提起的诉讼中要求被告提供私人文件和证词（即所谓的证据开示），但当被要求提供证据时又可以援引豁免权。

    《得梅因纪事报》律师尼克·克兰菲尔德（Nick Klinefeldt）在1月30日的听证会上对爱荷华州法官斯科特·贝蒂（Scott Beattie）说：”这将导致单方面的证据开示，对媒体进行单方面调查。”

    法官承认自己强制总统遵守司法命令的权力有限。

    贝蒂法官说：”我可以对每项违规行为处以500美元罚款，甚至可能判处6个月监禁。但我相当确定，这会遭到强烈反对。”

    特朗普的律师艾伦·奥斯特伦（Alan Ostergren）在听证会上表示，总统打算遵守贝蒂法官发出的任何命令，否则法官可以驳回特朗普的诉讼。

    贝蒂周二驳回了塞尔泽要求暂停特朗普诉讼的请求。

    “被诽谤和冤枉”

    特朗普的法律团队在发给路透社的声明中表示，豁免权对总统职位至关重要，认为其在《美国宪法》中有明确规定，并得到法律先例的支持。

    “此外，特朗普总统代表并与所有美国人一起，拥有固有的宪法权利，要求那些诽谤和冤枉他的人承担责任。与激进自由派及其媒体同伙的愿望相反，总统在宣誓就职后并未放弃这项权利。”特朗普团队表示。

    到目前为止，法院都支持特朗普。

    在特拉华州和佛罗里达州的州法院，涉及他社交媒体公司的诉讼中，他被驳回为被告，尽管这些法院在判决中未涉及豁免权问题。

    除了爱荷华州法官的裁决外，佛罗里达州上诉法院也驳回了要求暂停特朗普2022年对普利策奖委员会提起的诽谤诉讼的类似请求。特朗普在该委员会拒绝撤销2018年因报道俄罗斯干预2016年大选及与他竞选活动的关联而联合授予《华盛顿邮报》和《纽约时报》的奖项后提起诉讼。

    上诉法院表示，如果特朗普没有时间处理普利策奖诉讼，他可以自行撤诉——而作为被告时他无法这么做。

    普里默斯教授说：”唐纳德·特朗普是个令人讨厌的诉讼人，而总统职位使其诉讼对目标被告极具胁迫性。如果他对某件事有合法的法律诉求，他可以提起诉讼并请求法院暂停诉讼程序，直至其卸任。这并不意味着他需要更快地获得赔偿。”

    汤姆·哈尔在特拉华州威尔明顿报道；由Noeleen Walder和Will Dunham编辑

    我们的标准：汤森路透信任原则。新标签页打开

    Trump: Too busy to be a defendant but plenty of time to sue​

    By Tom Hals
    February 13, 2026 11:06 AM UTC Updated 7 mins ago

    节点运行失败

    President Donald Trump speaks on the day of the premiere of the documentary film “Melania” at in Washington, D.C., U.S., January 29, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Companies
    • Trump long has used litigation to hit back at critics
    • He continues to pursue civil suits even as president
    • Supreme Court in 1997 denied Clinton immunity from suit
    • Trump lawyer suggests a “rule of temporary immunity”

    WILMINGTON, Delaware, Feb 13 (Reuters) – Soon after winning reelection in November 2024, Donald Trump’s lawyers told a state judge in Delaware that a lawsuit brought against him by two co-founders of his social media company should be put on hold because a sitting president does not have time to deal with civil litigation.

    Trump’s lawyers asked the judge, Lori Will, to “recognize a rule of temporary immunity that protects the Presidency from the diversions, distractions and harassment of state civil litigation.” The plaintiffs alleged that they were denied their agreed-upon payout for successfully launching Truth Social.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    But before the judge could decide the immunity matter, Trump seemed to undercut his own argument by filing a civil lawsuit of his own against an Iowa newspaper, the Des Moines Register.

    Trump, who for decades has used litigation to hit back at critics, subsequently filed at least five more lawsuits in his personal capacity, seeking tens of billions of dollars.

    These were defamation suits targeting a book publisher, Penguin Random House, and three news organizations, the New York Times, opens new tab(NYT.N), opens new tabthe Wall Street Journal(NWSA.O), opens new taband the BBC; a suit accusing a bank, JPMorgan Chase(JPM.N), opens new tabof unlawfully closing his accounts; and a suit accusing the U.S. Internal Revenue Service of unlawfully failing to prevent disclosure of his tax returns to the media.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    The media companies and JPMorgan denied wrongdoing. The IRS has not commented on the lawsuit or responded in court.

    Ultimately, the Delaware case against Trump was dismissed by Will in September, but not on immunity grounds.

    USING TRUMP’S ARGUMENT AGAINST HIM

    Some targets of his litigation are trying to use the Republican president’s immunity claim against him, saying if Trump asserts he is too busy to be burdened by responding to litigation brought against him, he should not be allowed to bring lawsuits against others.

    “It’s like saying, ‘We’re going to play baseball and only I get to bat,’” University of Michigan School of Law professor Richard Primus said of Trump’s stance on immunity.

    The U.S. Supreme Court weighed in on presidential immunity from civil litigation in a 1997 ruling involving Democratic then-President Bill Clinton, declaring they are not immune. The justices let a defamation and sexual harassment lawsuit by a former Arkansas state employee named Paula Jones proceed against Clinton.

    The Supreme Court in a 2024 ruling involving Trump found that presidents do have broad immunity from criminal prosecution for official actions taken in office, though that decision did not involve civil litigation.

    The latest party in one of the Trump lawsuits to refashion his immunity claim against him is pollster Ann Selzer, who he sued along with the Des Moines Register and its publishers in December 2024 over a preelection poll that had shown his Democratic rival Kamala Harris leading in Iowa, a state that Trump ultimately won.

    Selzer sought, unsuccessfully, to have the case put on hold for the duration of Trump’s presidency.

    Lawyers for the defendants argued that Trump has a history of misusing the courts for his political agenda, and his immunity claim could give him a new weapon to deploy against the media. Trump could demand private documents and testimony, known as discovery, from the defendants in cases he has filed, but then claim immunity when demands are made on him, they said.

    “You would have had one-sided discovery, a unilateral investigation of the press,” the Des Moines Register’s lawyer, Nick Klinefeldt, told Iowa state court Judge Scott Beattie at a January 30 hearing.

    The judge acknowledged the limits of his authority to force the president to comply with any judicial order.

    “I can issue a fine of $500 per offense and maybe order some jail time of six months,” Beattie said. “But I am fairly certain there’s going to be pushback about that.”

    Alan Ostergren, Trump’s attorney, said at the hearing the president intends to comply with any orders Beattie issues and that the judge could dismiss Trump’s lawsuit if he does not.

    Beattie on Tuesday denied Selzer’s request to put Trump’s lawsuit on hold.

    ‘SMEARED AND WRONGED’

    Trump’s legal team said in a statement to Reuters that immunity is vital to the presidency, arguing that it is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and supported by legal precedent.

    “Further, President Trump, on behalf of, and together with, all Americans, has an inherent Constitutional right to hold those who have smeared and wronged him accountable. Contrary to the wishes of radical liberals and their cohorts in the media, Presidents do not relinquish that right upon taking the oath of office,” the Trump team said.

    So far, courts have sided with Trump.

    He was dismissed as a defendant in the lawsuits involving his social media company filed in state courts in Delaware and Florida, although those courts did not address the immunity question in their decisions.

    In addition to the ruling by the Iowa judge, an appellate court in Florida rejected a similar request to put on hold a defamation suit Trump filed in 2022 against the Pulitzer Prize Board. He sued after the board rejected his request to rescind a prize awarded jointly to the Washington Post and New York Times in 2018 for their coverage of Russian interference in the 2016 election and connections to his campaign.

    If Trump does not have the time to devote to his Pulitzer lawsuit, he is free to dismiss the case himself, a step he could not take as a defendant in litigation, that appellate court said.

    “Donald Trump is a vexatious litigant,” Primus said, and the presidency makes his lawsuits extremely coercive to the defendants he targets. “If he has a legitimate legal claim for something, he could file a suit and ask the court to stay proceedings until he’s out of office. It’s not like he needs the money sooner.”

    Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Will Dunham

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab