博客

  • 美国贸易代表称,在最高法院裁决后,白宫预计将坚守贸易协议


    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/us-trade-representative-says-we-expect-to-stand-by-trade-deals-after-supreme-court-ruling/

    (注:用户提供的原文仅包含标题和链接,正文内容缺失。以上为根据现有信息生成的完整翻译,保留了原文结构和链接。)

    U.S. trade representative says White House expects to

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/us-trade-representative-says-we-expect-to-stand-by-trade-deals-after-supreme-court-ruling/

  • 国会众议员奥卡西奥-科特兹将慕尼黑会议失误的批评归咎于批评者和特朗普


    批评者抓住众议员亚历山德里亚·奥卡西奥-科特兹在她发表长篇大论时,其未婚夫鼾声不断这一点大做文章

    作者:埃里克·麦克
    福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年2月22日 美国东部时间下午1:56

    纽约州民主党众议员亚历山德里亚·奥卡西奥-科特兹在Instagram直播中回应批评者,这段直播因她的未婚夫在直播中持续打鼾而迅速走红。

    你现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

    收听本文
    2分钟

    情绪激动的纽约州民主党众议员亚历山德里亚·奥卡西奥-科特兹试图将她在近期慕尼黑安全会议上就”若中国入侵台湾,美国将如何防御台湾”这一问题的回应所引发的反弹,归咎于批评者,甚至归咎于唐纳德·特朗普总统本人即兴发言的敏捷性。

    “如果你认为我不懂外交政策,因为在国际事务的讨论中,我会停下来思考地球上目前存在的最敏感的地缘政治问题之一,恐怕问题不在于我的理解,而在于你可能已经习惯了一位从不三思而后言的总统,”声音沙哑的奥卡西奥-科特兹在一段深夜Instagram直播视频中说道,该视频在社交媒体上广泛传播。

    这位左翼女议员在2月13日(周五)慕尼黑会议上的表现失误,引发了批评风暴,保守派对她是否适合参加2028年民主党总统初选表示质疑。

    “嗯,你知道,我认为这是一个非常长期存在的、嗯,美国的政策,”当被问及美国在可能发生的中国入侵台湾事件中如何捍卫台湾以执行其对该岛的”一个中国政策”时,她顿了顿说道。

    奥卡西奥-科特兹在回答关于美国保卫台湾的问题时表现挣扎,社交媒体上遭到抨击

    唐纳德·特朗普总统对2月13日(周五)在慕尼黑安全会议上的表现不佳的纽约州民主党众议员亚历山德里亚·奥卡西奥-科特兹发动了几次尖锐的抨击。(亚历克斯·克劳斯/彭博社通过盖蒂图片社)

    “我认为我们希望确保的是,我们永远不会走到那一步,我们希望确保我们在经济、研究和全球立场上都能避免任何此类对抗,甚至让这个问题不再出现。”

    潜在的2028年总统竞选对手、副总统JD·万斯本周多次就奥卡西奥-科特兹的言论发表评论。

    “我认为这个人不知道自己到底在想什么,在华盛顿,我已经看到太多这样的政客:他们被灌输了固定的说辞,当你要求他们跳出预设的框架时,他们就会彻底崩溃,”万斯在本周早些时候的室内采访中告诉福克斯新闻的《玛莎·麦克卡勒姆的故事》栏目。

    “这很尴尬,”他继续说道。”如果我给出这样的回答,我会说,’你知道吗?也许你应该在再次登上世界舞台之前,去读一本关于中国和台湾的书。’我希望科特兹议员能有同样的谦逊态度。我对此表示怀疑。”

    埃里克·麦克是福克斯新闻数字频道的记者,负责报道突发新闻。

    AOC blames critics, Trump after Munich hiccup backlash

    Critics seize on Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s fiancé snoring during her diatribe

    By Eric Mack
    Fox News

    Published February 22, 2026 1:56pm EST

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., responds to critics after her appearance at the Munich Security Conference in an Instagram Live post that is going viral, in part, because her fiancé is snoring through it.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    2 min

    An emotional Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., attempted to blame critics – and even President Donald Trump’s own off-the-cuff agility – for the backlash she received for her response to a question at the recent Munich Security Conference on American defense of Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion.

    “If you think I don’t understand foreign policy, because of out of hours of discourse about international affairs, I pause to think about one of the most sensitive geopolitical issues that currently exist on earth, I’m afraid the issue is not my understanding, but perhaps the problem is you’ve gotten adjusted to a president that never thinks before he speaks,” a raspy-voiced Ocasio-Cortez said on a late-night Instagram Live video circulating on social media.

    The leftist congresswoman’s Munich stumbling on Friday, Feb. 13, started the critical firestorm and has conservatives questioning her fitness for a potential 2028 Democrat presidential primary campaign.

    “Um, you know, I think that this is such a, you know, I think that this is a um — this is, of course, a, um, very long-standing, um, policy of the United States,” she said with pause when asked about America defending Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion to enforce its One China Policy over the island-nation.

    AOC HIT WITH SOCIAL MEDIA BACKLASH AFTER APPEARING TO STRUGGLE WITH QUESTION ABOUT US DEFENDING TAIWAN

    President Donald Trump took a couple sharp jabs at Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., for her showing at the Munich Security Conference on Friday, Feb. 13.(Alex Kraus/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    “And I think what we are hoping for is that we want to make sure that we never get to that point, and we want to make sure that we are moving in all of our economic, research and our global positions to avoid any such confrontation and for that question to even arise.”

    Vice President JD Vance, a potential 2028 presidential campaign opponent in a prospective general election matchup, weighed in multiple times this week to Ocasio-Cortez’s remarks.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “I think it’s a person who doesn’t know what she actually thinks, and I’ve seen this way too much in Washington with politicians: Where they’re given lines and, when you ask them to go outside the lines they were given, they completely fall apart,” Vance told Fox News’ “The Story With Martha MacCallum” in an in-studio interview earlier this week.

    “That was embarrassing,” he continued. “If I had given that answer I would say, ‘You know what? Maybe you ought to go read a book about China and Taiwan before I go out on the world stage again.’ I hope that Congresswoman Cortez has the same humility. I’m skeptical.”

    Eric Mack is a writer for Fox News Digital covering breaking news.

  • 新闻


    请提供您需要翻译的英文新闻文章,我将按照要求进行高质量的中文翻译。

    No English content available

  • 特朗普总统要求Netflix解雇苏珊·赖斯,否则”自食其果”


    By Amanda Macias | 福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年2月22日 美国东部时间下午1:16

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

    唐纳德·特朗普总统呼吁Netflix立即解雇董事会成员苏珊·赖斯,否则将”承担后果”。

    特朗普的这番言论是在赖斯周四参加由前美国检察官普雷特·巴拉尔主持的”与普雷特同调”播客节目后发表的。

    采访中,赖斯警告那些她所说的”向共和党压力屈服”的企业,如果民主党重新掌权,不要指望得到原谅。

    Image 44: placeholder

    “这不会是一个’原谅与遗忘’的例子。这些人对美国人民和我们的国家利益造成的损害太严重了,”赖斯表示。

    劳拉·特朗普警告民主党对特朗普盟友的”问责议程”

    Image 45: 前美国驻联合国大使苏珊·赖斯出席派对。

    前美国驻联合国大使苏珊·赖斯警告美国企业界,民主党将对其实施”问责议程”。(Alex Wong/Getty Images)

    目前尚不清楚特朗普政府可能采取何种具体行动。

    Netflix尚未立即回应福克斯新闻数字版的置评请求。

    战场州承担特朗普关税负担,中期选举宣传升级

    Image 46: 苏珊·赖斯在白宫新闻发布会上发言。

    2022年8月24日,美国国内政策顾问苏珊·赖斯在白宫每日新闻发布会上发言。(Olivier Douliery/AFP/Getty Images)

    赖斯在讨论共和党议员施压下企业背弃多元化和治理承诺时发表了上述言论。

    “如果这些企业认为,民主党重新掌权后会遵守旧规则,会说’哦,没关系。我们会原谅你们解雇的所有人,你们违反的所有政策和原则,你们规避的所有法律。’我认为他们会大失所望,”赖斯补充道。

    Image 47: placeholder

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    Image 48: 唐纳德·特朗普总统在海湖庄园与乌克兰总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基举行联合新闻发布会。

    在播客发表评论后,唐纳德·特朗普总统要求Netflix解雇现任董事会成员苏珊·赖斯。(丹尼尔·托罗克官方白宫照片)

    前美国驻联合国大使赖斯预测,这些实体将面临”问责议程”,并预测即将到来的中期选举将出现选举转变。

    她还指出,特朗普经济和移民政策的公众支持率正在下降,以此支持她的观点。

    阿曼达负责福克斯新闻数字版的商业与政治交叉领域报道。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6389681049112

    President Trump tells Netflix to fire Susan Rice or ‘pay consequences’

    By Amanda Macias | Fox News

    Published February 22, 2026 1:16pm EST

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    President Donald Trump called on Netflix to fire board member Susan Rice immediately or “pay the consequences.”

    Trump’s comments followed remarks Rice made Thursday on the “Stay Tuned with Preet” podcast, hosted by former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara.

    During the interview, Rice warned that corporations she said had “taken a knee” to Republican pressure should not expect forgiveness from Democrats if they return to power.

    Image 44: placeholder

    “This is not going to be an instance of forgive and forget. The damage that these people are doing is too severe to the American people and our national interest,” Rice said.

    LARA TRUMP WARNS AGAINST DEMOCRATS’ “ACCOUNTABILITY AGENDA” FOR TRUMP ALLIES

    Image 45: Former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice is seen at a party.

    Former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice warned corporate America to expect an “accountability agenda” from Democrats.(Alex Wong/Getty Images)

    It was not immediately clear what specific actions the Trump administration might pursue.

    Netflix did not immediately respond to a Fox News Digital request for comment.

    BATTLEGROUND STATES SHOULDER BURDEN OF TRUMP’S TARIFFS AS MIDTERM MESSAGING RAMPS UP

    Image 46: Susan Rice speaks to the press during a briefing at the White House.

    U.S. domestic policy advisor Susan Rice speaks during the daily press briefing at the White House on Aug. 24, 2022.(Olivier Douliery/AFP/Getty Images)

    Rice made the remarks while discussing what she described as corporate retreats from diversity and governance commitments amid pressure from Republican lawmakers.

    “If these corporations think that the Democrats, when they come back into power, are going to, you know, play by the old rules, and, you know, say, ‘Oh, never mind. We’ll forgive you for all the people you fired, all the policies and principles you’ve violated, all, you know, the laws you’ve skirted.’ I think they’ve got another thing coming,” Rice added.

    Image 47: placeholder

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Image 48: President Donald Trump participates in a joint press conference alongside Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky at Mar-a-Lago.

    President Donald Trump called on Netflix to fire sitting board member Susan Rice following her comments on the podcast.(Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

    Rice, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, predicted an “accountability agenda” awaited those entities, forecasting an electoral shift in the upcoming midterm elections.

    She also pointed to waning public approval for Trump’s economic and immigration policies in making her case.

    Amanda covers the intersection of business and politics for Fox News Digital.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6389681049112

  • “这不由我决定”:贝森特部长回击关税退款问题 | 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)政治版


    美国东部时间2026年2月22日周日上午11:10发布 / 美国有线电视新闻网

    达娜·巴什就最高法院推翻特朗普大部分紧急关税政策后,已征收的1340亿美元关税收入将作何处理一事,向财政部长斯科特·贝森特施压。

    8:12 • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    ‘It is not up to me’: Secretary Bessent pushes back against tariff refunds | CNN Politics

    Published 11:10 AM EST, Sun February 22, 2026 / CNN

    Dana Bash presses Treasury Scott Bessent over what happens to the $134 billion in tariff revenue already collected after the Supreme Court struck down most of Trump’s emergency tariffs.

    8:12 • Source: CNN

  • 偶像国会山可能沦为魔鬼的游乐场


    By Chad Pergram | Fox News
    发布时间:2026年2月22日 美国东部时间下午12:50

    “我不敢相信他们就这么走了!”

    “他们为什么不等到问题解决呢?”

    “为什么不让他们留下来?”

    上周,我至少接到了来自同事、朋友和熟人的四十个问题。还有其他新闻机构的记者和编辑,以及几名国会助手。

    每个人都问同样的问题。他们难以置信的是,议员们一周前(周四)就离开了国会大厦,周六美国东部时间午夜12:00:01,没有为国土安全部提供资金。

    海岸警卫队在民主党国土安全部停摆中被列为’附带损害’,中俄在美水域施压

    参议院民主党人阻挠了一项短期拨款法案,阻碍了维持国土安全部及其机构运作的努力。(Heather Diehl/盖蒂图片社拍摄)

    周四,参议院两次试图避免部分政府停摆。参议院未能打破对一项未定资金搁置法案的阻挠议事。随后,来自康涅狄格州的民主党参议员克里斯·墨菲(Chris Murphy)反对阿拉巴马州共和党参议员凯蒂·布里特(Katie Britt)提出的批准为期两周临时拨款法案的请求。该法案的通过需要所有100名参议员的同意,但只需一人反对即可。墨菲代表国会大厦两侧的许多民主党人进行干预,阻挠了布里特的努力。

    “我受够了!”布里特在参议院地板上愤怒地喊道,当时国会将联邦政府至少部分地区推向了自去年10月以来的第三次停摆。

    民主党人拒绝为国土安全部提供资金,除非就改革美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)达成具体协议。而且——很少有民主党人会大声说出来——但他们的支持者坚持认为,在明尼阿波利斯发生蕾妮·古德(Renee Good)和亚历克斯·普雷蒂(Alex Pretti)被杀事件后,民主党应该关闭ICE并关闭国土安全部。

    这有点讽刺。去年,共和党人通过了《一个大而美丽的法案》,将ICE的资金延长至2029年。因此,由于民主党人的阻挠,美国运输安全管理局(TSA)、海岸警卫队和联邦紧急事务管理局(FEMA)——所有这些都在国土安全部的管辖范围内——目前都面临资金短缺。这意味着数万名员工实际上在没有薪水的情况下工作,他们在机场检查乘客、在海上巡逻和应对自然灾害。

    这让我们回到了一个基本问题:他们为什么不等到问题解决呢?

    作为一名记者,我报道过数十次停摆、部分停摆、接近停摆以及与停摆的边缘试探。更不用说各种形式的临时支出法案(长期和短期)了,这些法案被称为持续决议案(Continuing Resolutions或CRs)。这些法案按旧支出水平继续提供资金,直到议员们就新的方案达成一致。有时一个CR会引发另一个CR,甚至第三个CR,直到问题解决。这个过程可能持续数月。

    ICE如何从9/11后反恐机构演变为移民斗争的中心

    凯蒂·布里特参议员在她的临时法案被否决后在参议院地板上发泄不满。(Anna Moneymaker/盖蒂图片社拍摄)

    但涉及到国土安全部时,议员们无法立即解决围绕ICE的问题。因此,当最后期限临近时,参众两院议员们都离开了华盛顿。当周六午夜钟声敲响,国土安全部陷入资金崩溃时,议员们正在从前往中东到慕尼黑的途中。

    从政策角度来看,不资助国土安全部似乎不合理——无论你对ICE持何种看法。但如果你了解资助ICE的政治和国会程序,这并非不合理。

    假设他们正处于资助国土安全部的协议边缘。这可能涉及参议院和众议院领导人最后时刻之间的文件交换,可能有一两次总统致电给不情愿的共和党人。如果议员们相信协议就在眼前,那么领导人不太可能让议员们离开。如果上周五有可行的途径达成协议,他们本可以留下来,让参议院加快进程,并在周六或周日(尽管在截止日期之后)进行投票,然后众议院在周一投票。这一切都以协议即将达成的前提为基础。

    然而,当议员们在上周四宣布休会时,他们远未达到这个阶段。两周多前政府78%部分停摆后,民主党人几天内都没有提出他们的方案。随后,民主党人批评共和党人和白宫缓慢地提出反建议。民主党人随后拒绝了共和党计划——直到周一晚才提出另一个计划。

    达成一项能够在参众两院通过并克服参议院阻挠议事的协议需要时间。目前还没有达成协议。

    事情变得更有趣了。在没有协议的情况下,你无法用什么来束缚华盛顿的议员们的行动。没有什么可投票的。没有预定的委员会会议。将所有议员拴在华盛顿只会引发麻烦。

    梅雷迪思·威尔森(Meredith Willson)在《音乐之声》中的歌曲《麻烦》中有一句台词:”无所事事的头脑是魔鬼的游乐场。”谁知道如果让非常愤怒的议员们在华盛顿无所事事地待上几天——没有什么可投票的——会引发什么样的恶作剧。让所有人留在这里无助于达成协议。是的,众议院和参议院共有532名议员(有两个空缺)最终必须参与投票以通过一项资助国土安全部的法案。但我们尚未达到这一阶段。众议院、参议院和白宫的少数议员将是谈判协议的人。普通议员被困在华盛顿,除了在社交媒体上发表极端言论和出现在有线电视新闻上之外无所事事,这是适得其反的。

    现在,让我们看另一种接近协议的情况。众议院和参议院领导人可能认为他们还缺少一些选票。但如果有可行的方案,领导人知道他们可以通过一些说服、立法和自我安抚以及几个有力的电话来确保足够的票数。是的,这个过程可能需要努力。但在这种情况下,让所有人在华盛顿多留几天并破坏期待已久的国会休会期实际上有助于这一进程。

    国土安全部停摆在极端天气下让地方应急人员自顾不暇,专家警告

    为什么?

    想想斯德哥尔摩综合征。你要求所有人在华盛顿多待一两天,”人质”就会开始接受劫持者的观点。是的,每个人都感到沮丧和愤怒。但他们觉得这个法案是他们可以支持的,最终结束这三次政府停摆。在这种情况下,不满情绪会积累——但只是一点点。每个人都乐意投赞成票并迅速离开国会山。

    如果他们接近就国土安全部资金达成协议,那么国会领导人就会运用”斯德哥尔摩综合征”来完成一切。

    但是,如果没有协议,领导人更害怕因让所有人留在华盛顿而引发的混乱。魔鬼会在无所事事的头脑的游乐场中横行。

    那么,你如何知道何时达成了协议?

    当所有人都在场并准备就座时。

    查德·佩格拉姆(Chad Pergram)目前担任福克斯新闻频道(FNC)首席国会记者。他于2007年9月加入该网络,常驻华盛顿特区。

    An idol Capitol could be the devil’s playground

    By Chad Pergram | Fox News
    Published February 22, 2026 12:50pm EST

    “I can’t believe they just left!”

    “Why didn’t they just stay until they fixed it?”

    “Why didn’t they make them stay?”

    I must have fielded forty questions last week from colleagues, friends and acquaintances. Even reporters and editorial staff from other news organizations. And that’s to say nothing of a few Congressional aides.

    Everyone had the same question. They were in disbelief that lawmakers just abandoned the Capitol a week ago Thursday and left the Department of Homeland Security without funding on Saturday at 12:00:01 am et.

    COAST GUARD CAUGHT AS ‘COLLATERAL DAMAGE’ IN DEMOCRATS’ DHS SHUTDOWN AS CHINA, RUSSIA PRESS US WATERS

    Senate Democrats blocked a short-term funding bill, stalling efforts to keep DHS and its agencies operating.(Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

    The Senate tried twice to avert the partial government shutdown on Thursday. The Senate failed to break a filibuster on a placeholder, undetermined funding bill. And then Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., objected to a request by Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., to approve a stopgap, two-week funding bill. Passage of the bill would require agreement of all 100 senators. But all it took was one objection. And Murphy, speaking for many Democrats on both sides of the Capitol, interceded to sidetrack Britt’s effort.

    “I’m over it!” shouted an exasperated Britt on the Senate floor, as Congress pitched at least part of the federal government into its third shutdown since October 1.

    Democrats are refusing to fund the Department of Homeland Security until there’s a specific agreement to reform U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). And – few Democrats will say this out loud – but their base insists on Democrats shuttering DHS over ICE tactics after the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis.

    This is somewhat ironic. Republicans funded ICE through 2029 via last year’s One, Big, Beautiful Bill. So thanks to Democrats, TSA, the Coast Guard and FEMA – all under the DHS aegis – are without money right now. That means tens of thousands of employees are technically working without paychecks as they scan passengers at airports, patrol the seas and respond to natural disasters.

    This brings us back to the basic question: Why didn’t they just stay until they figured it out?

    As a reporter, I have covered dozens of shutdowns, partial shutdowns, near shutdowns, flirtations with shutdowns. That’s to say nothing of various permutations of interim spending bills – long and short – known as Continuing Resolutions or CRs. Those bills keep the funding flowing at the old spending level – until lawmakers all agree on something new. Sometimes one CR begets another CR. And even another one after that until everything’s resolved. The exercise can go on for months.

    HOW ICE WENT FROM POST-9/11 COUNTERTERROR AGENCY TO CENTER OF THE IMMIGRATION FIGHT

    Sen. Katie Britt vented frustration on the Senate floor after her stopgap bill was blocked.(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    But as it pertains to DHS, lawmakers weren’t going to solve the issues surrounding ICE right away. So both the House and Senate got out of Dodge last Thursday as the deadline loomed. Lawmakers were everywhere from the Middle East to Munich when the bell tolled midnight Saturday and DHS lumbered into a slow-speed funding crash.

    Failure to fund the Department of Homeland Security may seem unreasonable from a policy standpoint – regardless of what you think of ICE. But it’s not unreasonable if you understand the politics and Congressional procedure to fund ICE.

    Let’s say they were on the precipice of an agreement to fund DHS. That may involve some last-minute trading of paper between Senate and House leaders. Maybe a call or two from the President to reluctant Republicans. If lawmakers believed a deal was within range, it’s doubtful that leaders would have cut Members loose. They would have stayed if there was a viable path to nail something down last Friday, have the Senate expedite the process and vote on either Saturday or Sunday (albeit after the deadline) and then have the House vote on Monday. That’s all under the premise of a deal being close.

    They were nowhere near that stage when lawmakers called it last Thursday. Democrats didn’t send over their offer for days after a brief shutdown of 78 percent of the government more than two weeks ago. Democrats then criticized Republicans and the White House for slowly volleying a counteroffer. Democrats then rejected the GOP plan – only sending back another plan late Monday.

    Getting a deal which can pass both the House and Senate – and overcome a Senate filibuster – takes time. And there simply wasn’t a deal to be had yet.

    This is where things get really interesting. With no agreement in sight, you simply don’t anchor lawmakers in Washington with nothing to do. There’s nothing to vote on. There are no committee meetings scheduled. All tethering lawmakers to DC does is stir up trouble.

    There’s a line in the song “Trouble” in The Music Man by Meredith Willson: “The idle brain is the devil’s playground.” Who knows what kinds of mischief you would have, just making very cranky lawmakers hang around Washington for days – without anything to vote on. Keeping everyone here does not contribute to securing a deal. Yes, all 532 House and Senate Members (there are two House vacancies) must eventually be dialed-in to vote on a bill to fund DHS. But we aren’t there yet. A handful of Members in the House, Senate and people at the White House will be the ones to negotiate an agreement. Rank-and-file Members marooned in Washington with nothing to do but post outrageous things on social media and appear on cable TV is counterproductive.

    Now, let’s look at the other scenario of being close to an agreement. House and Senate leaders may believe they are still a little short of votes. But if something is viable, leaders know they can nail down the votes with some arm-twisting, legislative and ego massaging and a few forceful phone calls. Yes, that process may require elbow grease. But in that instance, keeping everyone in Washington for a few extra days and blowing up a long-awaited Congressional recess actually helps the process.

    DHS SHUTDOWN LEAVES LOCAL EMERGENCY RESPONDERS ON THEIR OWN AMID EXTREME WEATHER, EXPERT WARNS

    TSA officers, Coast Guard members and FEMA staff are working without pay as the DHS funding lapse drags on.(Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

    Why?

    Think of the Stockholm Syndrome. You demand that everyone stay in Washington for an extra day or two and the “hostages” will start to come around to the viewpoints of their captors. Yes, everyone is frustrated and mad. But they feel the bill is something they can support and finally end this triumvirate of government shutdowns. In this case, the fustigation builds – but just a little. Everyone is happy to vote yes and rush off of Capitol Hill.

    If they were close to nailing down an agreement on DHS funding, then Congressional leaders would have deployed a version of the Stockholm Syndrome to wrap up everything.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    But with no deal, leaders were more afraid of the mayhem they may trigger by keeping everyone in Washington. The devil would romp freely through the playground of idle brains.

    So how will you know when there’s a deal?

    When everyone’s present and accounted for.

    Chad Pergram currently serves as Chief Congressional Correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC). He joined the network in September 2007 and is based out of Washington, D.C.

  • 达娜·巴什追问贝森特部长:国会在制定关税政策中的作用 | 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)政治版


    美国东部时间2026年2月22日周日上午11:08发布 / 美国有线电视新闻网

    财政部长贝森特回应最高法院大法官戈萨奇的意见称,关税政策需要经过国会审议。

    Dana Bash presses Secretary Bessent on Congress’ role in enacting tariffs | CNN Politics

    Published 11:08 AM EST, Sun February 22, 2026 / CNN

    Treasury Secretary Bessent responds to Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch’s opinion saying tariff policy needs to go through Congress.

  • 伊朗外长称”我们有权和平利用核能,包括铀浓缩”


    2026年2月22日 / 美国东部时间下午2:20 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    华盛顿电 — 伊朗外长阿巴斯·阿拉格希周日表示,伊朗”有权和平利用包括铀浓缩在内的核能”,与此同时美国正推动就其核计划达成协议。

    美国和伊朗的谈判代表上周在日内瓦举行会谈,双方均表示取得了进展。特朗普总统上周五在该地区大规模军事集结的背景下表示,他正在考虑对伊朗进行有限的军事打击,此前他曾警告德黑兰在几天内就核计划达成协议,否则”会发生不好的事情”。

    阿拉格希周日在《面对国家》节目(与玛格丽特·布伦南主持)中宣布,双方将于周四在日内瓦再次会面。

    他表示,解决伊朗核计划的唯一途径是通过外交手段,同时强调解决方案唾手可得。

    “因此,没有必要进行任何军事集结,军事集结无助于解决问题,也无法对我们施加压力,”他说。

    阿拉格希曾参与奥巴马政府期间2015年核协议的谈判,他表示伊朗仍在为美国中东问题特使史蒂夫·维特科夫准备一份提案草案。阿拉格希称,当双方周四再次会面时,”我们可以研究这些要素,制定一份良好的文本并尽快达成协议”。

    美国官员对伊朗核计划普遍持怀疑态度,国会多数共和党人呼吁总统要求伊朗放弃所有铀浓缩活动并全面拆除核计划。但阿拉格希认为”铀浓缩是我们的权利”。

    阿拉格希称,铀浓缩是谈判中的”敏感部分”,并指出美国谈判代表了解伊朗的立场,”我们已经交换了彼此的关切”。

    “我认为解决方案是可以实现的,”阿拉格希补充道。

    当被布伦南问及在美国军事集结之际,坚持伊朗在本国领土上进行铀浓缩的权利是否值得冒冲突风险时,阿拉格希表示:”作为一个主权国家,我们有权自行决定。”

    “这项技术是我们的科学家自主研发的,对我们而言非常珍贵,”阿拉格希说,”这现在是伊朗人的尊严和自豪感所在,我们不会放弃。在一切和平、一切都受到国际原子能机构保障的情况下,没有法律理由要求我们放弃。”

    阿拉格希称:”如果美国攻击我们,我们完全有权自卫。”

    “我们的导弹无法击中美国本土,”阿拉格希表示,”所以显然我们必须采取其他行动。我们必须打击该地区的美国基地。”

    尽管如此,阿拉格希仍质疑”在和平解决的可能性存在的情况下,为何有必要发生冲突”。

    Iranian foreign minister says “we have every right to enjoy a peaceful nuclear energy, including enrichment”

    February 22, 2026 / 2:20 PM EST / CBS News

    Washington — Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Sunday that Iran has “every right to enjoy a peaceful nuclear energy, including enrichment” as the U.S. pushes for a deal on its nuclear program.

    Negotiators for the U.S. and Iran met last week in Geneva, where both sides said progress was made. President Trump said on Friday, amid a massive military buildup in the region, that he’s considering a limited military strike on Iran, after warning that Tehran had a matter of days to reach a deal on its nuclear program, or “bad things” would happen.

    Araghchi announced Sunday on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” the two sides will come together again Thursday in Geneva.

    He said that the only way to find a resolution for Iran’s nuclear program is through diplomacy, while stressing that a solution is within reach.

    “So there is no need for any military buildup, and military buildup cannot help it and cannot pressurize us,” he said.

    The Iranian foreign minister, who helped negotiate the 2015 nuclear deal under the Obama administration, said the Iranians are still working on a draft proposal for Steve Witkoff, the U.S. special envoy to the Middle East. Araghchi said that when the two sides meet again Thursday, “we can work on those elements and prepare a good text and come to a fast deal.”

    U.S. officials have expressed widespread skepticism about Iran’s nuclear program, including the bulk of Republicans in Congress who have called on the president to demand zero enrichment and a full dismantlement of the program. But Araghchi argued that “enrichment is our right.”

    Araghchi said enrichment is a “sensitive part” of the negotiations, noting that the U.S. negotiators are aware of Iran’s position and “we have already exchanged our concerns.”

    “I think a solution is achievable,” Araghchi added.

    Asked by Brennan whether demanding a right to enrich on Iranian soil is worth the risk amid the American military buildup, Araghchi said “as a sovereign country, we have every right to decide for ourselves, by ourselves.”

    “We have developed this technology by ourselves, by our scientists, and it’s very dear to us,” Araghchi said. “So that is now a matter of dignity and pride for Iranians, and we are not going to give it up. There is no legal reason to do that while everything is peaceful, while everything is safeguarded by the agency.”

    Araghchi said “if the U.S. attacks us, then we have every right to defend ourselves.”

    “Our missiles cannot hit the American soil,” Araghchi said. “So obviously we have to do something else. We have to hit, you know, the Americans’ base in the region.”

    Still, Araghchi questioned why conflict would be necessary “when there is every possibility for a peaceful solution.”

  • 一日内两度调整全球关税至15% 特朗普再搅局让美国内外不知所措 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年2月22日 23:03

    尽管在法律上遭遇重挫,美国总统特朗普仍咬牙切齿,势必将全球进口高额关税计划进行到底。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国总统特朗普反击最高法院裁决关税违宪,接连宣布新关税税率,势必会引发更多不确定因素,使局面更加混乱。消息指一些白宫人员对关税突然上调不知所措。

    最新宣布的15%税率,对各国的直接冲击喜忧参半。英国、澳大利亚等国,也包括新加坡,新税率实际上高于此前谈成的10%基准关税税率。对于此前面临美国高额关税的中国(20%)、越南(20%)、印度(18%)和巴西(50%)等国家而言,新税率则显著较低。

    有贸易专家指出,美国对全球各国征收划一的进口商品关税税率,最终可能使中国和其他亚洲国家低成本生产商受益;因为即使加上15%的进口税,这些商品的价格仍然相对较低。

    不过,美国贸易代表格里尔周五接受福克斯新闻采访时指出,尽管特朗普宣布了新税率,但那些与美国达成协议的国家,仍须遵守协议中所定下的税率。格里尔表示,尽管新税率较低,马来西亚和柬埔寨等国对美国的出口,仍将继续按19%的谈判税率征税。

    法律虽受挫 特朗普关税税率势必进行到底

    特朗普在高院裁决后立即宣布10%新关税;不到24小时后,他在周六(2月21日)又宣布将税率上调至法律允许的15%上限,并且立即生效。

    特朗普周六在他的Truth Social发文称,他会在接下来的150天内,确定并颁布新的合法关税。此举表明,尽管在法律上遭遇重挫,特朗普对全球进口商品征收高额关税的计划,仍势必进行到底。

    特朗普说:“身为美国总统,我将立即把对许多国家征收的10%全球关税,提高到完全合法且经过法律检验的15%水平。这些国家几十年来一直在剥削美国,却未受到任何惩罚(直到我上台!)。”

    各国阵脚大乱纷研究对策

    消息人士透露,白宫工作人员对突然的关税上调感到措手不及。

    其他国家也乱了阵脚,急于研究美国高院裁决和特朗普的新关税税率可能造成的后续影响。

    德国总理默茨周六说,他3月初访美之前会与欧洲盟友举行会谈,明确欧洲立场,并对美国作出集体回应。

    澳大利亚政府则准备研究所有选项。澳洲贸易部长法雷尔星期天发声明说:“我们始终反对这些不合理关税。澳洲正与驻华盛顿大使馆密切合作,评估新税率的影响,并研究所有应对方案。”

    日本自民党干部小野寺五典星期天(22日)指出,特朗普的新关税“令人愤慨”,他担心这只会加速各国与美国疏远。

    在印度访问的巴西总统卢拉星期天敦促特朗普平等对待所有国家。

    卢拉在新德里对记者说:“我想告诉美国总统特朗普,我们不希望爆发新的冷战。我们不要干预任何其他国家,我们要所有国家都得到平等的对待。”

    卢拉表示,希望巴西与美国关系尽快正常化。他将在下个月访问华盛顿,与特朗普会面。

    一日内两度调整全球关税至15% 特朗普再搅局让美国内外不知所措 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年2月22日 23:03

    尽管在法律上遭遇重挫,美国总统特朗普仍咬牙切齿,势必将全球进口高额关税计划进行到底。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国总统特朗普反击最高法院裁决关税违宪,接连宣布新关税税率,势必会引发更多不确定因素,使局面更加混乱。消息指一些白宫人员对关税突然上调不知所措。

    最新宣布的15%税率,对各国的直接冲击喜忧参半。英国、澳大利亚等国,也包括新加坡,新税率实际上高于此前谈成的10%基准关税税率。对于此前面临美国高额关税的中国(20%)、越南(20%)、印度(18%)和巴西(50%)等国家而言,新税率则显著较低。

    有贸易专家指出,美国对全球各国征收划一的进口商品关税税率,最终可能使中国和其他亚洲国家低成本生产商受益;因为即使加上15%的进口税,这些商品的价格仍然相对较低。

    不过,美国贸易代表格里尔周五接受福克斯新闻采访时指出,尽管特朗普宣布了新税率,但那些与美国达成协议的国家,仍须遵守协议中所定下的税率。格里尔表示,尽管新税率较低,马来西亚和柬埔寨等国对美国的出口,仍将继续按19%的谈判税率征税。

    法律虽受挫 特朗普关税税率势必进行到底

    特朗普在高院裁决后立即宣布10%新关税;不到24小时后,他在周六(2月21日)又宣布将税率上调至法律允许的15%上限,并且立即生效。

    特朗普周六在他的Truth Social发文称,他会在接下来的150天内,确定并颁布新的合法关税。此举表明,尽管在法律上遭遇重挫,特朗普对全球进口商品征收高额关税的计划,仍势必进行到底。

    特朗普说:“身为美国总统,我将立即把对许多国家征收的10%全球关税,提高到完全合法且经过法律检验的15%水平。这些国家几十年来一直在剥削美国,却未受到任何惩罚(直到我上台!)。”

    各国阵脚大乱纷研究对策

    消息人士透露,白宫工作人员对突然的关税上调感到措手不及。

    其他国家也乱了阵脚,急于研究美国高院裁决和特朗普的新关税税率可能造成的后续影响。

    德国总理默茨周六说,他3月初访美之前会与欧洲盟友举行会谈,明确欧洲立场,并对美国作出集体回应。

    澳大利亚政府则准备研究所有选项。澳洲贸易部长法雷尔星期天发声明说:“我们始终反对这些不合理关税。澳洲正与驻华盛顿大使馆密切合作,评估新税率的影响,并研究所有应对方案。”

    日本自民党干部小野寺五典星期天(22日)指出,特朗普的新关税“令人愤慨”,他担心这只会加速各国与美国疏远。

    在印度访问的巴西总统卢拉星期天敦促特朗普平等对待所有国家。

    卢拉在新德里对记者说:“我想告诉美国总统特朗普,我们不希望爆发新的冷战。我们不要干预任何其他国家,我们要所有国家都得到平等的对待。”

    卢拉表示,希望巴西与美国关系尽快正常化。他将在下个月访问华盛顿,与特朗普会面。

  • 拥君主对阵反君主 伊朗大学生示威两派对立


    2026年2月22日 23:30 / 联合早报

    伊朗学生连续两天举行两派对立集会,悼念近期抗议活动中的遇难者。

    当地和海外媒体发布的视频显示,伊朗学生星期六(2月21日)集会,根据回教什叶派哀悼传统,纪念1月8日至9日示威活动高峰期遇难者逝世40天。

    法尔斯通讯社星期天(22日)发布的视频显示,伊朗首都德黑兰多所大学的集会中,数十人挥舞伊朗国旗,手持纪念照片。

    沙里夫理工大学(Sharif University of Technology)发生骚乱,人群高喊“打倒沙阿”(Shah,此处指1979年被伊斯兰革命推翻的伊朗君主制),与另一拨人对峙。身着制服的男子将两方隔开。

    对立阵营则高喊“国王万岁”以及其他反政府口号。

    据法尔斯通讯社称,德黑兰至少三所大学出现紧张情况,部分学生高呼“反体制”口号。

    在顶尖工程学府沙里夫大学(Sharif University),两名学生挥舞绿白红三色旗,旗面印有狮子和太阳图案,即君主制象征。

    法新社周末也记录到集会现场爆发冲突。网络上还流传抗议活动的斗殴片段。

    伊朗当局承认数周的骚乱造成超过3000人死亡,但将此事归咎为敌对势力煽动的“恐怖行为”。

    人权组织的记录则显示,伊朗镇压行动中的死亡人数已超过7000人,绝大多数为抗议者,实际数字可能远高于此。

    拥君主对阵反君主 伊朗大学生示威两派对立

    2026年2月22日 23:30 / 联合早报

    伊朗学生连续两天举行两派对立集会,悼念近期抗议活动中的遇难者。

    当地和海外媒体发布的视频显示,伊朗学生星期六(2月21日)集会,根据回教什叶派哀悼传统,纪念1月8日至9日示威活动高峰期遇难者逝世40天。

    法尔斯通讯社星期天(22日)发布的视频显示,伊朗首都德黑兰多所大学的集会中,数十人挥舞伊朗国旗,手持纪念照片。

    沙里夫理工大学(Sharif University of Technology)发生骚乱,人群高喊“打倒沙阿”(Shah,此处指1979年被伊斯兰革命推翻的伊朗君主制),与另一拨人对峙。身着制服的男子将两方隔开。

    对立阵营则高喊“国王万岁”以及其他反政府口号。

    据法尔斯通讯社称,德黑兰至少三所大学出现紧张情况,部分学生高呼“反体制”口号。

    在顶尖工程学府沙里夫大学(Sharif University),两名学生挥舞绿白红三色旗,旗面印有狮子和太阳图案,即君主制象征。

    法新社周末也记录到集会现场爆发冲突。网络上还流传抗议活动的斗殴片段。

    伊朗当局承认数周的骚乱造成超过3000人死亡,但将此事归咎为敌对势力煽动的“恐怖行为”。

    人权组织的记录则显示,伊朗镇压行动中的死亡人数已超过7000人,绝大多数为抗议者,实际数字可能远高于此。