No English content available

More gasoline price shocks might hit US drivers this summer travel season

2026-05-20T21:35:46.594Z / Reuters

Summary

• Automobile Association expects record 39.1 million to travel by car this weekend
• Gasoline prices surge due to Iran conflict, Strait of Hormuz closure impacts supply
• Analysts warn that low inventories, refinery outages and hurricanes could push prices higher

NEW YORK, May 21 (Reuters) – As millions of travelers hit the road for the U.S. Memorial Day holiday ​weekend, high gasoline prices fueled by ongoing supply disruptions from the war with Iran are set to add financial strain for motorists, kicking ‌off what is set to become a pricier summer travel season.

U.S. retail gasoline prices have jumped more than $1.50 per gallon, or about 45%, since late February, when the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran. Prices for crude oil used to make gasoline have also surged, along with prices for many goods, as the conflict has led to the effective closure of the ​Strait of Hormuz, a key trade conduit through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil consumption flows.

The Reuters Power Up newsletter provides everything you need to know about the global energy industry. Sign up here.

President Donald Trump is facing mounting political pressure as ​households grapple with higher energy costs. Several states are already suspending gas taxes to ease the pain at the pump, and

similar discussions
about ⁠reducing the 18.4-cent federal gasoline tax are underway.

US retail fuel prices have surged sharply

This Memorial Day weekend, a three-day weekend during which many Americans take to the road, will kick off the summer ​travel season. Even with higher gas prices, a record of 39.1 million people are expected to travel by car and 3.66 million by plane to their destinations, according ​to American Automobile Association (AAA) data.

“This is the most volatile summer at the pump in years, and the Strait of Hormuz closure is at the center of it,” said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, adding that Americans are going to pay billions more to get where they’re going this summer, and even after the Strait reopens. It could take a ​year or more for prices to fully recover, he added.

HIGHER COSTS, SHORTER TRIPS

Still, travelers are planning to drive fewer miles this summer, reflecting the financial strain prolonged ​high energy prices have on American motorists.

Just 56% of Americans now plan to drive more than two hours this summer, compared to 69% last year, a new GasBuddy survey shows. ‌Cost is now ⁠the dominant travel consideration, with 67% saying gas prices are directly impacting their driving plans and 36% saying rising costs are causing them to take fewer road trips, the survey shows.

Despite prices at the pump hovering at their highest level in four years, gasoline consumption remained relatively strong, analysts said, however, they warned a supply shortage could be on the horizon with summer travel season approaching.

“Gasoline storage has fallen for fourteen weeks in a row, and every week during the war in Iran, ​and we are going to stagger into ​Memorial Day weekend, the start of ⁠the summer driving season, within striking distance of the 11-year low,” said Bob Yawger, director of energy futures at Mizuho. “We are in big trouble as far as gasoline is concerned,” he said.

U.S. gasoline inventories fell by 1.5 million barrels last week to 214.2 ​million barrels, the Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday, compared with analysts’ expectations in a Reuters poll for a 2.1 ​million-barrel draw.

On top of ⁠uncertainty that still looms over the Middle East, recent refinery outages, the approaching Atlantic hurricane season and tightening global inventories will add further upward pressure to fuel costs.

The national average price of gasoline is projected to be $1.48 more expensive on this Memorial Day compared to last year, GasBuddy forecast on Wednesday showed, adding that if traffic through the ⁠Strait of ​Hormuz remained restricted for much of the summer, prices could cross the $5 per gallon mark.

“We have to ​be very concerned that globally we’re drawing inventories at a terrific pace, and global demand is finding its way here not just for crude, but for refined products,” said John Kilduff, partner at Again ​Capital.

Reporting by Nicole Jao in New York; Additional reporting by Georgina McCartney in Houston; Editing by Stephen Coates

One GOP congressman is vowing to end Trump’s $1.8 billion compensation fund for allies

2026-05-20 5:18 PM ET / CNN

By Ellis Kim, Annie Grayer

Updated May 20, 2026, 5:50 PM ET

PUBLISHED May 20, 2026, 5:18 PM ET

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, in December 2025.

Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Summary

• Pennsylvania GOP Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick said he is exploring ways to block the nearly $1.8 billion fund.
• Many congressional Republicans say they were left in the dark about the fund and are scrambling to learn its details.
• The Department of Justice says the fund will be overseen by five board members appointed by the attorney general, with one chosen after consulting Congress.

AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

One Republican congressman says he is exploring ways to end the Trump Justice Department’s move to establish a tax-payer fueled “anti-weaponization” fund, a move likely to draw the ire of President Donald Trump.

Pennsylvania GOP Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick told reporters he “100%” wants to prevent the nearly $1.8 billion fund that could compensate Trump’s allies from moving forward.

“Once we get to the bottom of the source of the funding, we’re going to put legislative text together. We got to figure out what we have jurisdiction over. That’s the first question,” he said Wednesday, later sending a letter to the Justice Department demanding answers about the fund.

Fitzpatrick, a moderate who represents a district that voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election, was the first in his party to publicly reject the fund outright and vow to stop it. He has recently bucked some of Trump’s other priorities – like funding for his East Wing ballroom – and provoked the president’s threat of backing a primary opponent against him.

A number of Republicans across the Capitol, however, were scrambling behind the scenes to learn more about the fund and what oversight role they can play, underscoring how lawmakers in the president’s own party are often left in the dark about key administration moves.

Related article President Donald Trump speaks to the press before boarding Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on Wednesday. Jacquelyn Martin/AP Why Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund is so scandalous 6 min read

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said that he expects scrutiny over the fund to occur through the appropriations process for the next fiscal year.

“My assumption is that, based on some of the blowback that’s come since this was announced, that there would be a significant amount of attention paid to it,” Thune told reporters Tuesday.

Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins pressed acting Attorney General Todd Blanche for more details in a Senate hearing on Tuesday, asking how much will be paid for each claim, the legal basis for those decisions and whether the information related to the claims will be publicly available.

Blanche acknowledged that the creation of the fund “is unusual” but argued that “it is not unprecedented.”

The DOJ’s announcement earlier this week outlines that the money to enact these settlements will come from a permanent appropriation already established for the department to settle cases, called the judgment fund. According to the department, the attorney general will appoint five board members to oversee the fund, one of whom will be chosen “in consultation” with congressional leadership.

But House Speaker Mike Johnson said Wednesday that “we don’t know any of the details of that settlement fund.”

A source with experience settling federal employment cases noted that the judgment fund already exists to handle such settlements, arguing that the establishment of the so-called anti-weaponization fund felt more like an overblown press release with political ramifications and saying it does not change the legal process.

Still, most Republicans are trying to learn the basics about the fund given they were not consulted ahead of time.

House Oversight Chair James Comer said he did not know anything about the fund until he read news reports about it.

House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole, meanwhile, told CNN he was not consulted or given any heads up about the administration’s creation of this fund or how it would be used and said he was looking into whether any legislative action is required.

“I don’t know anything about it. I haven’t seen it yet. I don’t know what it is legislatively. So I really don’t have anything to say,” Cole said.

白宫：特朗普拟短时间内决定新对台军售

2026年5月21日 07:42 / 联合早报

美国白宫官员星期三（5月20日）告诉台湾媒体，美国总统特朗普将在相当短的时间内，针对新对台军售方案做出决定。

特朗普同日称，将与台湾总统赖清德交谈。目前特朗普政府正在考虑是否推进对台湾的140亿美元（179亿新元）军售，这项潜在交易已引发中国大陆批评。

特朗普也说：“我们很好地掌控了局势。我们和习主席举行了很棒的会晤……我们会处理台湾问题。”特朗普上周五（15日）结束对华三天国事访问。

自1979年美国与台湾断交、与中国大陆建交以后，台美领导人47年来只在2016年有过一次简短通话，时任台湾总统蔡英文在特朗普首次当选总统后致电祝贺。

有白宫官员以背景说明的方式告诉台湾《联合报》，如同特朗普所言，特朗普将在相当短的时间内，针对新的对台军售方案做出决定。

延伸阅读

美国对台军售未定 特朗普称将与赖清德交谈

白宫并说明，特朗普去年12月核准111亿美元的对台军售，符合美国自1950年以来的政策。

白宫也说，特朗普在第一任期核准的对台军售多于美国其他总统；在第二任期核准的对台军售，多过前总统拜登四年任期的总额。

DOJ veterans fear criminal probe into ex-CIA director is being stacked with Trump loyalists

2026-05-20T17:49:00-0400 / CBS News

Law enforcement veterans are expressing deep concerns that the Trump Justice Department’s criminal investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan is being systematically stacked with politically motivated personnel who are intent on a partisan indictment.

Brennan is the subject of two criminal probes being led by the Miami-area U.S. Attorney’s Office. One is weighing allegations that he lied to Congress in 2023 about the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment on Russian interference in the 2016 election. The second is a sprawling “grand conspiracy” probe examining whether Obama- and Biden-era officials were part of a long-running conspiracy to keep President Trump out of political office.

Last month, the Justice Department abruptly removed the senior career prosecutor who was overseeing the Brennan case after she expressed concerns about the strength of the evidence and replaced her with Joseph DiGenova, a staunch Trump ally, to run both investigations.

On Tuesday, DiGenova’s wife, Victoria Toensing, a former federal prosecutor, conservative commentator and staunch Trump ally, was sworn in as a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of Florida. DiGenova declined to say whether she is working on the Brennan and grand conspiracy cases, but a source with direct knowledge confirmed she is.

Now, multiple sources are raising concerns that some of the line prosecutors and FBI agents assigned to the case may harbor underlying political motivations that could cast doubt on their ability to conduct an impartial investigation.

One of the FBI agents, for example, once sought to investigate whether Italian military satellites hacked American voting machines in the 2020 election. A second agent was involved in the recently botched criminal prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey, sources told CBS News, and also lobbied senators to confirm Kash Patel to be FBI director.

Those two agents — Rose Marketos and Jack Eckenrode — both served on the Director’s Advisory Team at the FBI, which was set up by Patel and staffed by agents from around the country who support his policy goals, according to sources familiar with the matter.

A number of the agents who have participated in that group have also been assigned to work on high-profile cases involving targets identified by Mr. Trump as political adversaries.

Marketos and Eckenrode did not respond to requests for comment.

“The FBI does not comment on the contents or existence of investigations in the media, particularly those pertaining to classified information,” an FBI spokesperson said. “Moreover, any accusation of political bias is false and eerily similar to the actual conduct of former officials under the previous administration who actively participated in weaponized government for years.”

Meanwhile, one of the line prosecutors who recently joined the case, Chris DeLorenz, previously clerked for U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon as she was presiding over — and ultimately dismissed — the criminal charges against Mr. Trump related to his retention of classified records.

DeLorenz was detailed as a prosecutor to the probe despite his limited prosecutorial experience, after recently working in the deputy attorney general’s office.

CBS has reached out to DeLorenz for comment.

A federal grand jury in Ft. Pierce, Florida, where Judge Cannon is based, is now investigating the “grand conspiracy” allegations. Because she is the only U.S. District judge in Ft. Pierce, she would most likely handle any potential criminal case brought there.

“Career attorneys and agents take very seriously the power they have to charge someone with a crime. Until this administration, they were expected to drop a case when an investigation revealed no crime occurred,” said Stacey Young, a former Justice Department lawyer. Young founded and leads the nonprofit Justice Connection, which provides support for former and current career Justice Department civil servants.

“Now, if they dare to say they can’t justify bringing charges against a perceived enemy of this president, they’re pushed aside and replaced with loyalists who will contort the facts and the law to manufacture a case,” she said.

Critics of the investigation have said that it has been tainted by politics since its inception. Mr. Trump has railed against Brennan for years, calling him “crooked as hell” and suggesting he should “pay a price.” Mike Davis, a legal surrogate for Mr. Trump and one of his most pugnacious defenders, pushed relentlessly for a sweeping conspiracy case against former Obama and Biden administration officials with Brennan at its center.

The case was met with skepticism from career Justice Department lawyers from the outset. It was transferred to the Southern District of Florida after federal prosecutors in Philadelphia who were initially assigned to review the case determined there was not enough evidence to proceed, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

Seasoned current and former agents and prosecutors say their concerns over the already-fraught criminal cases involving Brennan have only grown as more personnel with seemingly pro-Trump perspectives have been added to the investigative teams.

“Italygate”

One agent who is now involved in the Brennan and grand conspiracy cases is Marketos, who previously worked on a public corruption squad in the Washington Field Office that had investigated Mr. Trump and was disbanded last year.

During recent witness interviews with former intelligence officials, Marketos asked questions about the “Clinton plan intelligence” — an apparent reference to a 2016 election conspiracy theory,claiming Hillary Clinton used allegations about Russia to distract from her own scandals, sources told CBS News. (The theory was later discredited by a Republican-appointed special counsel).

Criminal defense lawyers who have interacted with Marketos told CBS News she’s taken a secondary role in witness interviews and has largely conducted herself professionally.

During her time on the public corruption squad for the Washington field office, she told colleagues she believed Trump won the 2020 election, several sources said.

Without the knowledge of her immediate supervisor, she sought permission to travel to Rome to speak with a confidential human source who claimed that Italian military satellites had hacked into Dominion’s voting machines to flip votes against Mr. Trump, according to sources familiar with the matter and congressional testimony from that supervisor.

In the transcript of the testimony, the former supervisor said he later discovered that Justice Department officials laughed when they saw her request. He also said several of the sources providing the tip about the satellites had “partisan political ties.”

“There was a lack of investigative rigor,” the former FBI supervisor told lawmakers.

Her supervisor denied her request after discovering the former acting deputy attorney general had previously referred to the allegation as “pure insanity,” according to a transcript of the interview. He added that he shut down the investigation in around July 2021.

An internal Justice Department directory lists Marketos as being assigned to the Office of Congressional Affairs, though she hasn’t spent much — if any — time there, sources said.

CBS News could not determine how Marketos came to be assigned to the Brennan case. Typically agents are assigned cases to investigate in the regional offices where they are based. The two investigations targeting Brennan are being conducted in Florida. Marketos is based in the Washington, D.C. area.

Marketos’ involvement in the Brennan case has also attracted attention because of her recent temporary assignment with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence — the agency whose core mission is integrating foreign, domestic and military U.S. intelligence in defense of American interests at home and abroad.

Since last year, the ODNI has been tasked by its director, Tulsi Gabbard, with identifying what has been called political “weaponization” or political bias in the intelligence community. The office last year referred the “grand conspiracy” case for investigation.

Marketos has primarily spent her time since last year on temporary assignment to Gabbard’s office, and she has even reached out to defense lawyers on the Brennan case from her post there, sources told CBS News.

“It is a staggering indictment of the current institutional standards that an individual who lacks the basic discernment to distinguish between a fringe conspiracy theory and a federal crime is now tasked with investigating a former CIA director,” former FBI agent James Davidson told CBS News.

Davidson is now the president of the FBI Integrity Project, a group founded by former agents who say they aim to protect the bureau’s integrity from partisan influences and other abuses.

An official from ODNI declined to answer questions about Marketos’ role, stating that she is not an employee of the office and referring CBS News to the FBI.

“As Director Gabbard has said publicly, we’ve sent multiple criminal referrals and stated that ODNI shares information as appropriate with the DOJ and FBI to support their investigations,” a Gabbard spokesperson said.

From retirement to the Comey case

Eckenrode, meanwhile, was a retired longtime agent who returned to the bureau after Patel became director. He previously served on the investigative team for former special counsel John Durham, sources said.

His involvement in the latest probes related to Russia and the 2016 election was previously reported by the New York Times.

Eckenrode publicly endorsed Patel’s nomination to lead the FBI in a letter to lawmakers, according to the Washington Examiner. In that letter, he criticized the bureau’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, writing, “Regrettably, the FBI’s conduct during Crossfire Hurricane has caused the Bureau’s reputation to plummet, and for a variety of reasons, it has not rebounded.”

Eckenrode was one of two FBI agents assigned last year to investigate whether former FBI Director James Comey lied to Congress, sources told CBS News.

Before the case was dismissed on a different issue, a magistrate judge blasted the two agents and the former interim U.S. attorney, saying they had potentially committed misconduct by failing to filter evidence that was likely covered by Comey’s attorney-client privilege rights and by using stale search warrants from a prior FBI investigation that started in 2017.The Justice Department has denied any wrongdoing.

Eckenrode has been present for some witness interviews and meetings to discuss the Brennan case, several sources said, though CBS News has not determined his precise role in the probes.

He is listed in the Justice Department’s internal directory under Patel’s office, which is also a part of the bureau not typically assigned to criminal probes.

Joe DiGenova, the 2020 Trump campaign attorney who’s leading the Brennan investigations

DiGenova returns to the Justice Department more than two decades after he served as U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C., from 1983 to 1988.

More recently, DiGenova represented Mr. Trump’s campaign in its failed attempt to overturn the 2020 election results, and he has long railed against Brennan’s role in assessing that Russia tried to meddle in the 2016 election, referring to him in one interview as the “primogenitor of the entire counterintelligence investigation.”

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, when asked by CBS News last month whether DiGenova’s involvement in the case could raise questions about bias, replied, “He has to make sure that he is doing everything ethically. I’m sure that he would.”

On Tuesday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Jason Reding Quiñones, posted a photograph of DiGenova, Toensing and others standing outside the federal courthouse in Ft. Pierce.

DiGenova “led a productive meeting with half the team in person at the federal courthouse in Fort Pierce and the other half joining by video,” Quiñones wrote. “Good things are building in SDFL.”

维拉球员和团队赢得欧洲联赛锦标后，在随队球迷面前兴奋庆祝。 （法新社）

（伊斯坦布尔法新电）阿斯顿维拉（Aston Villa）蒂勒曼斯（Tielemans）和布恩迪亚（Buendia）的两个漂亮进球，在星期四（5月21日）的欧洲联赛决赛中以3比0大胜德甲球队弗赖堡（Freiburg），终结球会长达30年的冠军荒。

在伊斯坦布尔举行的球赛中，蒂勒曼斯第40分钟用一记势大力沉的凌空抽射打破僵局。在上半场伤停补时前的最后几秒，布恩迪亚在禁区边缘轰入弧线球为维拉扩大领先优势。

下半场第57分钟，罗杰斯（Rogers）彻底浇灭首次杀入欧洲决赛的弗赖堡的反扑希望。这是维拉自1996年夺得英格兰联赛杯以来的首座冠军奖杯，也是他们阔别44年再次捧起欧洲重要大赛赛事的冠军杯。在维拉152年的队史中，最辉煌的时刻莫过于1982年在鹿特丹凭借彼得·威斯（Peter Withe）的进球爆冷击败拜仁慕尼黑（Bayern Munich）、捧起欧洲冠军杯（欧冠前身）。

维拉主帅埃梅里带领维拉夺下生涯的第五座欧洲联赛冠军。（法新社）

这场胜利再次证明维拉主帅埃梅里（Emery）在欧洲联赛赛场上无与伦比的统治力。这位54岁的西班牙名帅此前曾率领塞维利亚（Sevilla，2014年、2015年、2016年）和比利亚雷亚尔（Villarreal，2021年）四度夺冠，如今他带领维拉再度登顶，将个人的欧洲联赛冠军增加到五座。

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4A0w1f58DCo

Trump’s $1.776 billion ‘weaponization’ fund sparks outrage, but court challenges will be tough

2026-05-20T21:58:06.786Z / Reuters

May 20 (Reuters) – Opponents of President Donald Trump’s sweeping legal settlement with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service will face high hurdles in challenging its $1.776 billion fund for victims of alleged political “weaponization” and its provision barring audits of his taxes, according to legal experts.

Congressional Democrats derided the so-called Anti-Weaponization ​Fund as a slush fund to steer taxpayer dollars to Trump’s political allies, while watchdog groups called the tax immunity agreement illegal. Even some Republicans expressed qualms. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, for instance, said ‌he was “not a big fan” of the plan.

Two police officers who defended the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, against a failed bid by Trump supporters to stop Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory, have already sued. The officers allege that the fund will reward and empower rioters who have harassed them and made death threats.

Legal experts said it is unclear whether challengers will be able to block payouts or undo Trump’s shield against audits of past taxes if Congress, controlled by Trump’s fellow Republicans, stays silent.

‘NO LONGER A VENUE’

In part, that is because Trump dismissed his $10 billion lawsuit ​against the IRS before the settlement was announced, preventing the judge in that case from doing anything.

“There’s no longer a venue to challenge the legality of this settlement,” said Danny Werfel, who served as IRS commissioner during the Biden ​administration.

The Justice Department announced the fund on Monday, shortly after Trump voluntarily withdrew his lawsuit accusing the IRS of wrongdoing in media leaks of his tax returns during his first term ⁠as president.

Trump also dropped claims over the government’s investigations of contacts between his 2016 presidential campaign and Russians, and the FBI’s 2022 search of his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida for classified documents he retained after his first term ended. Trump will also get ​an apology under the plan.

On Tuesday, the Justice Department quietly released an addendum signed that day by acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche, which “FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED” the government from prosecuting or pursuing pending tax claims against Trump, his family and his businesses. Blanche is ​a former personal lawyer for Trump.

‘WEAPONIZATION OR LAWFARE’

The $1.776 billion fund, an apparent nod to the year of the country’s founding, will be controlled by Trump allies.

It will be used to compensate people who claim to have been damaged by U.S. government “weaponization or lawfare.” Trump has accused the Biden administration and other political opponents of improperly using law enforcement, intelligence and regulatory agencies to target him and his allies.

The fund will be financed from the Judgment Fund, which Congress established in 1956 to pay legal claims made against the government.

Blanche told U.S. senators on Tuesday there was precedent for the creation ​of the anti-weaponization fund. He cited a $680 million fund created in 2010 for Native American farmers during Democratic President Barack Obama’s administration to resolve years-long litigation known as the Keepseagle case.

While that settlement was deemed fair, reasonable and adequate by a federal judge, ​Blanche said the IRS settlement will not undergo court review. Blanche also said January 6 defendants, who already have received clemency from Trump, could get payments.

LEGAL STANDING

Legal experts said opponents of the $1.776 billion fund will have a difficult time establishing a legal right to sue, known as ‌standing, because it ⁠may be tough to demonstrate they have been harmed in some way.

The two police officers who sued in federal court in Washington claimed they faced injury because the fund would encourage January 6 defendants to keep threatening them and potentially commit violence.

“The increased risk of threats, harassment and violence our plaintiffs are suffering as a result confers standing,” said Public Integrity Project CEO Brendan Ballou, who filed the lawsuit.

THE HUNTER BIDEN QUESTION

Some experts said the best chance to challenge the fund may come later, when claimants – even Trump opponents – might allege they were harmed because their payouts were too low.

Josh Gardner, a lawyer who led the Justice Department’s handling of the Keepseagle case, pointed to Hunter Biden, the former president’s son.

Hunter Biden was convicted of tax and gun crimes during his father’s presidency ​in a case pursued by a Trump-appointed federal prosecutor who ​later was elevated to the position of special counsel. President ⁠Biden pardoned his son seven weeks before Trump returned to office.

“If Hunter Biden were to submit a claim and his claim were rejected, he would have standing to challenge not just his denial, but I think the entire structure of this settlement,” Gardner said.

‘REMARKABLY LOOSE’

If litigants establish standing, they could argue that the IRS settlement violates several laws, according to legal experts.

One issue is whether ​the fund violates the U.S. Constitution’s Appropriations Clause, which gives Congress power of the purse, because U.S. lawmakers did not authorize it. Ninety-three Democratic lawmakers filed a legal brief making ​that very point shortly after Trump dismissed ⁠his lawsuit but before the judge formally closed the case.

Another issue is whether the fund may violate a U.S. law governing the Judgment Fund if payments are made to people with no pending or imminent claims against the federal government.

“The real problem is, Congress has been remarkably loose in controlling these kinds of payments,” said Paul Figley, an emeritus law professor at American University. “It’s wrong, but not illegal.”

There also is the question of whether Trump’s tax immunity provision violates a U.S. law that protects against political interference in taxpayer audits.

Werfel, the former ⁠IRS commissioner, added ​that future administrations often unwind non-legislative actions of prior administrations.

Some experts said one or both chambers of Congress, though not individual lawmakers, could challenge the fund. ​That is unlikely for now, with Republicans controlling the House of Representatives and Senate.

“There’s a ferment of outrage that is justifiable against this deal, and that will bring off the sidelines many people who are hurt by it,” said Norm Eisen, co-founder of Democracy Defenders Action, a Democratic-leaning legal advocacy group representing the ​93 lawmakers in the IRS case.

No English content available

Former DOJ lawyer charged with theft of unreleased report on Trump documents case

May 20, 2026 9:19 PM UTC / Reuters

By Nate Raymond

May 20, 2026 9:19 PM UTC Updated 1 hour ago

The word “justice” is seen engraved at the headquarters of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 10, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

May 20 (Reuters) – A former U.S. Department of Justice attorney has been charged with emailing herself copies of an unreleased volume of Special Counsel ​Jack Smith’s report concerning the now-dismissed criminal case accusing President Trump ‌of retaining classified documents after his first term.

Carmen Lineberger, who had worked in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, pleaded not guilty to charges ​related to the theft and concealment of government records during a ​Wednesday hearing in federal court in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Her ⁠lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump was ​accused in the case pursued by Smith of illegally storing documents related to ​U.S. national defense, including the American nuclear program, at his Mar-a-Lago social club and obstructing U.S. government efforts to retrieve the material.

Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump ​appointee, dismissed the indictment in 2024, finding that Smith had not ​been lawfully appointed by the Justice Department during Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration.

Special counsels, who ‌are ⁠appointed to lead certain politically sensitive investigations, are required to draft reports to the U.S. attorney general detailing their conclusions on whether to seek charges.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

But Cannon last year barred disclosure of the portion of Smith’s final report that ​related to the ​classified documents case.

According ⁠to an indictment unsealed on Wednesday, Lineberger had received a copy of that volume last year before Cannon ruled ​while serving as the managing assistant U.S. attorney for her ​office’s ⁠branch in Fort Pierce, Florida.

The indictment said Lineberger on two occasions in late 2025 emailed her personal account a file that contained the volume, concealing her ⁠actions ​by saving the records under the file names “Chocolate_cake_recipe.pdf” ​and “Bundt_Cake_Recipe.pdf.”

The indictment contains no allegations concerning what, if anything, Lineberger did with the documents after ​emailing them to herself.

Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Bill Berkrot

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

DOJ charges ex-prosecutor with emailing secret Jack Smith report to herself under file name “Bundt Cake Recipe”

May 20, 2026 / 8:01 PM EDT / CBS News

A former federal prosecutor was charged this week with emailing herself a report on the Justice Department’s investigation into President Trump that a judge had kept under lock and key.

Carmen Lineberger was indicted Tuesday on two counts of theft of government property, plus counts of concealing and removing a public record and altering a public record. She was arraigned Wednesday and pleaded not guilty.

The charges focus on a report penned by former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith, whose team charged Mr. Trump with trying to overturn his 2020 election loss and allegedly mishandling classified documents. The election-related parts of the report were released in mid-January 2025, but a week later, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon blocked former Attorney General Merrick Garland “or his successor(s)” from releasing the portion on classified documents, known as “Volume II.”

A newly unsealed indictment accuses Lineberger — previously the managing assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of Florida — of downloading a copy of Volume II last December and saving it under the file name “Bundt_Cake_Recipe.pdf.” She then allegedly emailed it from her Justice Department account to her personal account.

Lineberger was also accused of downloading portions of an internal Justice Department memorandum and emailing it to herself in September 2025. Those records were allegedly saved under the file name “Chocolate_cake_recipe.pdf.”

The indictment does not specify what, if anything, Lineberger allegedly planned to do with the documents.

Lineberger’s attorney declined to comment.

The Volume II report at the center of Tuesday’s indictment was compiled after Smith charged Mr. Trump in 2023 with retaining sensitive government documents from his first term and storing them at Mar-a-Lago. The then-former president and two employees were also charged with conspiracy to obstruct a federal investigation. Mr. Trump has long denied wrongdoing and cast the investigation — which included an FBI search of Mar-a-Lago — as politically motivated.

Cannon dismissed the indictment in 2024 on the grounds that Smith was unlawfully appointed. Then, one day after Mr. Trump was sworn in for his second term, Cannon said the Justice Department cannot release or share Smith’s report on the probe, on the grounds that it could unfairly prejudice the two Trump staffers whose criminal cases remained open.

Cannon did not prevent the Justice Department from releasing Volume I of Smith’s report, which focused on Mr. Trump’s efforts to remain in office after losing in 2020. The charges against Mr. Trump hit a roadblock in mid-2024 after the Supreme Court ruled the president has immunity for official acts, and the case was dismissed after Mr. Trump won back the presidency. Smith argued in Volume I that Mr. Trump would have been convicted if not for his return to office.