博客

  • 黎巴嫩真主党导弹击中以色列卫星地面站 | 联合早报


    发布时间: 2026-03-11T03:45:20.000Z | 来源: https://www.zaobao.com.sg/news/world/story20260311-8712743

    耶路撒冷周边城市贝特谢梅什3月1日遭伊朗袭击,造成至少八人死亡、23人受伤。 (路透社)

    以色列媒体星期二(3月10日)说,日前黎巴嫩真主党发射的导弹击中了位于耶路撒冷周边城市贝特谢梅什附近的一处以色列卫星地面站。

    以色列第12频道电视台当天公布的一段画面显示,一处卫星地面站发生剧烈爆炸,随后现场冒起浓烟。报道说设施“遭导弹直接命中”。

    《以色列时报》10日引述救援部门的话报道,袭击造成“基础设施受损”,并导致两人受伤。以色列国防军称,由于故障,导弹“未遭到拦截且当地未响起警报”。报道说,这处卫星地面站是“民用商业站点”。

    黎巴嫩真主党导弹击中以色列卫星地面站 | 联合早报

    发布时间: 2026-03-11T03:45:20.000Z | 来源: https://www.zaobao.com.sg/news/world/story20260311-8712743

    耶路撒冷周边城市贝特谢梅什3月1日遭伊朗袭击,造成至少八人死亡、23人受伤。 (路透社)

    以色列媒体星期二(3月10日)说,日前黎巴嫩真主党发射的导弹击中了位于耶路撒冷周边城市贝特谢梅什附近的一处以色列卫星地面站。

    以色列第12频道电视台当天公布的一段画面显示,一处卫星地面站发生剧烈爆炸,随后现场冒起浓烟。报道说设施“遭导弹直接命中”。

    《以色列时报》10日引述救援部门的话报道,袭击造成“基础设施受损”,并导致两人受伤。以色列国防军称,由于故障,导弹“未遭到拦截且当地未响起警报”。报道说,这处卫星地面站是“民用商业站点”。

  • 美国在伊拉克的外交设施遭无人机袭击


    2026年3月11日 11:52 / 联合早报

    位于伊拉克首都机场附近的美国外交支持中心遭到无人机袭击。

    多家美国媒体星期二(3月10日)报道,共有六架无人机飞往这一为美国外交官提供后勤服务的大型设施,其中一架无人机击中美国外交支持中心,其余五架被击落。

    目前美国外交支持中心受损及人员伤亡情况尚不清楚。

    美国在伊拉克的外交设施遭无人机袭击

    2026年3月11日 11:52 / 联合早报

    位于伊拉克首都机场附近的美国外交支持中心遭到无人机袭击。

    多家美国媒体星期二(3月10日)报道,共有六架无人机飞往这一为美国外交官提供后勤服务的大型设施,其中一架无人机击中美国外交支持中心,其余五架被击落。

    目前美国外交支持中心受损及人员伤亡情况尚不清楚。

  • 路透社报道:ChatGPT及其他AI聊天机器人获美国参议院官方使用批准


    By Reuters
    2026年3月10日 美国东部时间晚上10:43 更新于44分钟前

    (图片说明:2025年10月27日拍摄的智能手机上的ChatGPT应用图标。路透社/Dado Ruvic/插图 [购买授权,新标签页打开])

    3月10日(路透社)- 《纽约时报》周二援引一份备忘录报道称,ChatGPT和另外两个人工智能聊天机器人已获美国参议院批准用于官方用途。

    报道补充称,助手们可以使用谷歌(GOOGL.O)的Gemini聊天机器人、OpenAI的ChatGPT或微软Copilot,这些工具均已整合到参议院的平台中。

    订阅路透社人工智能通讯,了解AI和科技领域的最新突破。点击此处注册。

    微软(MSFT.O)一位发言人告诉路透社,该公司正在关注此次批准事宜,而谷歌和OpenAI未回应置评请求。

    Vallari Srivastava在班加罗尔报道;Alan Barona编辑

    我们的标准:汤森路透信托原则。[新标签页打开]

    ChatGPT, other AI chatbots approved for official use in US Senate, NYT reports

    By Reuters
    March 10, 2026 10:43 PM UTC Updated 44 mins ago

    节点运行失败

    The ChatGPT app icon on a smartphone in this illustration taken October 27, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration [Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab]

    March 10 (Reuters) – ChatGPT ​and two other artificial ‌intelligence chatbots have been approved for official ​use in ​the U.S. Senate, the New ⁠York Times ​reported on Tuesday, citing ​a memo.

    Aides could use Google’s (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Gemini chat, OpenAI’s ​ChatGPT or Microsoft ​Copilot, all of which are ‌already ⁠integrated into Senate platforms, the report added.

    Learn about the latest breakthroughs in AI and tech with the Reuters Artificial Intelligencer newsletter. Sign up here.

    A Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab spokesperson ​told ​Reuters ⁠the company was looking into ​the approval, while ​Google ⁠and OpenAI did not respond to ⁠requests ​for comment.

    Reporting ​by Vallari Srivastava in Bengaluru; ​Editing by Alan Barona

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 小红书治理AI托管类账号 严禁虚假创作与互动 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年3月11日 07:15

    小红书治理人工智能托管类账号,严禁虚假创作与互动。 (档案照)

    中国互联网平台小红书治理人工智能(AI)托管类账号,严禁虚假创作与互动,违反者最高将予以封禁处理。

    小红书星期二(3月10日)发布公告称,平台严禁任何利用技术手段模拟真人、进行非真实内容创作或虚假互动的行为,即日起对AI托管类账号实行有关治理措施。

    公告提到,平台近期发现部分用户采用AI托管模式运营账号,通过技术手段自动生成内容、发布笔记,并在评论、私信、群聊等场景中模拟真人互动。

    公告称,即日起,平台将对AI托管类账号实行以下治理措施:对于普通账号偶发使用AI托管代写、代发笔记或进行互动,平台将根据违规程度,采取警告、限制内容分发等梯度处理措施;对于直接通过AI托管工具注册、发布、互动的账号,或主页所有公开笔记均为AI托管代发的账号,平台将予以封禁处理。

    公告称,数以亿计的用户在小红书平台上分享自己的生活经验,每一次真实的记录、每一次真诚的交流,共同构成了社区温暖的底色。公告呼吁用户在创作过程中合理使用AI工具,坚持由真人分享真实经历与感受,共同守护社区的真实底色。

    立即订阅《联合早报》,了解中国时政动态,把握大中华区经济发展脉搏,解锁地区热点评析。

    特别优惠

    早报数码配套个人版(每年付费)

    每月S$9.90S$4.95

    [立即订阅]
    *第一年S$59.40,第二年起每年S$118.80

    [小红书][人工智能]

    [上一篇 杨丹旭:中美关系过“大年”][下一篇 较强冷空气将影响中国 局地降温14℃以上]

    [购买此文章]

    小红书治理AI托管类账号 严禁虚假创作与互动 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年3月11日 07:15

    小红书治理AI托管类账号 严禁虚假创作与互动

    小红书治理人工智能托管类账号,严禁虚假创作与互动。 (档案照)

    中国互联网平台小红书治理人工智能(AI)托管类账号,严禁虚假创作与互动,违反者最高将予以封禁处理。

    小红书星期二(3月10日)发布公告称,平台严禁任何利用技术手段模拟真人、进行非真实内容创作或虚假互动的行为,即日起对AI托管类账号实行有关治理措施。

    公告提到,平台近期发现部分用户采用AI托管模式运营账号,通过技术手段自动生成内容、发布笔记,并在评论、私信、群聊等场景中模拟真人互动。

    公告称,即日起,平台将对AI托管类账号实行以下治理措施:对于普通账号偶发使用AI托管代写、代发笔记或进行互动,平台将根据违规程度,采取警告、限制内容分发等梯度处理措施;对于直接通过AI托管工具注册、发布、互动的账号,或主页所有公开笔记均为AI托管代发的账号,平台将予以封禁处理。

    公告称,数以亿计的用户在小红书平台上分享自己的生活经验,每一次真实的记录、每一次真诚的交流,共同构成了社区温暖的底色。公告呼吁用户在创作过程中合理使用AI工具,坚持由真人分享真实经历与感受,共同守护社区的真实底色。

    立即订阅《联合早报》,了解中国时政动态,把握大中华区经济发展脉搏,解锁地区热点评析。

    特别优惠

    早报数码配套个人版(每年付费)

    每月S$9.90S$4.95

    [立即订阅]
    *第一年S$59.40,第二年起每年S$118.80

    [小红书][人工智能]

    [上一篇 杨丹旭:中美关系过“大年”][下一篇 较强冷空气将影响中国 局地降温14℃以上]

    [购买此文章]

  • 瑞士巴士起火致6人死亡、3人住院,警方称火灾或为”蓄意”行为


    更新于:2026年3月10日 / 美国东部时间晚上8:05 / CBS/美联社

    警方周二表示,瑞士一辆巴士发生火灾,造成至少6人死亡,另有3人因重伤住院。警方称,正在调查火灾是否由车上人员纵火引起。

    弗里堡州(或地区)警方发言人弗雷德里克·帕波(Frederic Papaux)表示,这场灾难于周二晚上在伯尔尼(瑞士首都)以西约15英里的克泽尔斯(Kerzers)镇的一辆巴士上爆发。

    据路透社报道,帕波在新闻发布会上说:”现阶段,我们有证据表明这是车上某人故意纵火的行为。”

    警方不愿详细说明为何认为火灾可能是蓄意纵火。弗里堡警方在一份声明中表示,公共检察官已展开刑事调查,”以确定这起悲剧的确切情况”。

    据哥伦比亚广播公司新闻(CBS News)的合作伙伴英国广播公司新闻(BBC News)报道,当局无法立即证实有人向自己泼汽油的报道。

    图片

    瑞士媒体现场拍摄的图片显示火焰吞噬了巴士。

    “救援人员赶到现场后注意到车辆已完全被火焰吞没,”地方政府在一份声明中说。

    警方称,救护车和直升机团队将三名重伤人员送往医院,另有两人在现场接受治疗。

    该区域交通巴士由PostBus运营,该公司隶属于国家邮政服务。

    6 killed, 3 hospitalized in Switzerland bus fire that may have been “deliberate,” police say

    Updated on: March 10, 2026 / 8:05 PM EDT / CBS/AP

    A bus fire in Switzerland killed at least six people and left three others hospitalized with severe injuries, police said Tuesday. They said they were investigating whether the blaze was set by someone on the bus.

    Police spokesperson Frederic Papaux of Fribourg canton, or region, said the inferno broke out Tuesday evening on a bus in the town of Kerzers, about 15 miles west of Bern, the Swiss capital.

    “At this stage, we have elements suggesting a deliberate act by a person who was inside the bus,” Papaux said at a news conference, according to Reuters news agency.

    Police would not elaborate on why they believe the fire could have been deliberately started. Fribourg police said in a statement that a criminal investigation had been opened by public prosecutors “to determine the exact circumstances of the tragedy.”

    Authorities said they could not immediately confirm reports that a person had doused themselves in gasoline, CBS News partner BBC News reported.

    Fire investigators examine the charred shell of a postal bus that caught fire in Kerzers, Switzerland, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. Alessandro della Valle/Keystone via AP

    Images from the scene on Swiss media showed flames tearing through the bus.

    “After rushing to the scene, rescue teams noted that the vehicle was totally engulfed in flames,” the regional government said in a statement.

    Ambulance and helicopter teams ferried three injured people with severe injuries to hospitals, while two others were treated on site, police said.

    The regional transport bus is operated by PostBus, which is affiliated with the national postal service.

  • 较强冷空气将影响中国 局地降温14℃以上 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年3月11日 07:37

    中国气象局预计,一股较强冷空气将影响中国,局地降温14℃以上。

    据中新社报道,中央气象台预计,星期三(3月11日)至星期天(3月15日),受较强冷空气影响,长江以北大部地区有大范围雨雪,西南地区及黄淮以北大部地区将出现大风降温天气,其中西北地区影响最重,将出现暴雪、大风、强降温和沙尘暴天气。

    预计11日至14日,降雪主要在西北地区、华北高海拔区域、内蒙古东北部、东北地区,以小到中雪为主,新疆沿天山地区和昆仑山、甘肃中东部、青海东部、陕西北部及祁连山和秦巴山区等地部分地区有大到暴雪,最强降雪时段出现在13日至14日,部分区域累计降雪量10至15毫米,新增积雪深度5至10厘米,局地10厘米以上,汾渭平原、华北平原及以南的地区为小到中雨,四川盆地东部、陕西南部等地有大雨。

    11日至15日,西南地区及黄淮以北大部地区气温将下降4℃至8℃,新疆大部、西北地区中东部、内蒙古东北部等地降温10℃至12℃,局地14℃以上。

    气象部门提醒,此次天气过程影响范围广,黄淮、江淮、江汉、西南地区的降雨利于土壤增墒和库塘蓄水,缓和云南、四川等地气象干旱,降低森林草原火险气象等级,但西北地区降雪强、大风降温显著并伴有沙尘天气,新疆、青海、甘肃、陕西等地需防范低能见度、道路积雪结冰等对交通出行造成的不利影响,并做好设施温棚、临时搭建物等防风加固工作。此外,新疆沿天山一带局地雪崩气象风险较高。

    较强冷空气将影响中国 局地降温14℃以上 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年3月11日 07:37

    中国气象局预计,一股较强冷空气将影响中国,局地降温14℃以上。

    据中新社报道,中央气象台预计,星期三(3月11日)至星期天(3月15日),受较强冷空气影响,长江以北大部地区有大范围雨雪,西南地区及黄淮以北大部地区将出现大风降温天气,其中西北地区影响最重,将出现暴雪、大风、强降温和沙尘暴天气。

    预计11日至14日,降雪主要在西北地区、华北高海拔区域、内蒙古东北部、东北地区,以小到中雪为主,新疆沿天山地区和昆仑山、甘肃中东部、青海东部、陕西北部及祁连山和秦巴山区等地部分地区有大到暴雪,最强降雪时段出现在13日至14日,部分区域累计降雪量10至15毫米,新增积雪深度5至10厘米,局地10厘米以上,汾渭平原、华北平原及以南的地区为小到中雨,四川盆地东部、陕西南部等地有大雨。

    11日至15日,西南地区及黄淮以北大部地区气温将下降4℃至8℃,新疆大部、西北地区中东部、内蒙古东北部等地降温10℃至12℃,局地14℃以上。

    气象部门提醒,此次天气过程影响范围广,黄淮、江淮、江汉、西南地区的降雨利于土壤增墒和库塘蓄水,缓和云南、四川等地气象干旱,降低森林草原火险气象等级,但西北地区降雪强、大风降温显著并伴有沙尘天气,新疆、青海、甘肃、陕西等地需防范低能见度、道路积雪结冰等对交通出行造成的不利影响,并做好设施温棚、临时搭建物等防风加固工作。此外,新疆沿天山一带局地雪崩气象风险较高。

    节点运行失败

  • 美国议员担忧特朗普可能向伊朗派遣”地面部队”


    2026年3月10日 21:20 UTC / 路透社

    华盛顿,3月10日(路透社) – 美国民主党参议员周二对伊朗局势表示担忧,称他们担心唐纳德·特朗普总统可能会部署美国地面部队,并指出鉴于俄罗斯对德黑兰军事的支持,风险极高。

    “我们知道俄罗斯已经在协助提供情报,并将这些情报提供给伊朗,而且俄罗斯、中国、伊朗和朝鲜形成了一个轴心,这使美国及其国家安全面临更大风险,”新罕布什尔州民主党参议员吉恩·沙欣在CNN上说。

    路透社伊朗简报通讯将为您提供伊朗局势最新动态和分析。请在此注册。

    广告 · 继续滚动阅读

    在行政官员向参议院武装部队委员会进行机密简报后发表讲话时,沙欣呼吁政府派官员到国会公开作证。

    两名熟悉美国情报报告的消息人士表示,俄罗斯正在向伊朗提供针对美国基地和船只的目标情报。

    沙欣和其他参议员表示,特朗普助手们一系列闭门简报让他们的疑问多于答案,尤其是关于战争的成本和预期持续时间,以及美军是否会被派往德黑兰。

    [1/3] 2026年3月5日,在伊朗德黑兰,美国-以色列与伊朗冲突期间,爆炸后烟雾升起,人们聚集在路边。Majid Asgaripour/WANA(西亚新闻社)通过路透社提供

    “我们似乎正走在向伊朗部署美国地面部队以实现这里任何潜在目标的道路上,”康涅狄格州参议员理查德·布卢门撒尔在周二的机密简报后告诉记者。

    广告 · 继续滚动阅读

    特朗普尚未排除向伊朗派遣美国地面部队的可能性。在国会参众两院均占微弱多数的共和党人几乎一致支持他在伊朗问题上的战略,只有少数人对这场战争表示怀疑。

    布卢门撒尔还提到俄罗斯介入将美国民众生命置于危险中的风险。”从字面上说,俄罗斯似乎正在积极、大量地协助我们的敌人,提供情报,可能还有其他手段,中国也可能在协助伊朗,”布卢门撒尔说。

    “因此,美国人民应该比本届政府告诉他们的更多地了解这场战争的代价、对我们身着军装的子女的危险,以及这场战争进一步升级和扩大的可能性,”他说。

    议员们发表上述评论之际,他们正在等待白宫预计提出的战争资金追加请求。几名国会助手表示,预计特朗普将要求500亿美元,但也有人认为这个估计似乎偏低。

    帕特里夏·曾格勒报道;乔纳森·兰迪补充报道;唐·杜尔菲和大卫·格雷戈里奥编辑

    US lawmakers worry Trump may put ‘boots on the ground’ in Iran

    March 10, 2026 9:20 PM UTC / Reuters

    WASHINGTON, March 10 (Reuters) – Democratic U.S. senators expressed alarm on Tuesday about the Iran war, saying they were worried that President Donald Trump could deploy U.S. ground forces and noting the high risks ​given Russian support for Tehran’s military.

    “We know that Russia is already helping with ‌intel, providing that to Iran, and that there’s an axis with Russia and China, Iran and North Korea that puts at greater risk the United States and our national security,” Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire said on ​CNN.

    The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Speaking after a classified briefing from administration officials to the Senate Armed Services ​Committee, Shaheen called on the administration to send officials to testify publicly in ⁠Congress.

    Two sources familiar with U.S. intelligence reports have said that Russia is providing Iran ​with targeting intelligence on U.S. bases and ships.

    Shaheen and other senators said a series of closed-door ​briefings from Trump aides have left them with more questions than answers, especially about the cost and expected duration of the war, and whether U.S. forces would be sent into Tehran.

    Item 1 of 3 People gather on the sides of a road as smoke rises in the background following an explosion, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 5, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS

    [1/3]People gather on the sides of a road as smoke rises in the background following an explosion, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 5, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS

    “We seem to be on a ​path toward deploying American troops on the ground in Iran to accomplish any of the ​potential objectives here,” Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told reporters after Tuesday’s classified briefing.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Trump has not ruled ‌out sending ⁠U.S. ground troops into Iran. His Republicans, who have slim majorities in both houses of Congress, have almost unanimously backed his strategy on Iran, with only a handful expressing doubt about the war.

    Blumenthal also cited the risk of Russian involvement putting American lives at risk. “Literally, Russia ​seems to be aiding ​our enemy actively and ⁠intensively with intelligence and perhaps with other means and China also may be assisting Iran,” Blumenthal said.

    “So the American people deserve to know ​much more than this administration has told them about the cost ​of the war, ⁠the danger to our sons and daughters in uniform and the potential for further escalation and widening of this war,” he said.

    The lawmakers’ comments came as they awaited a request the White ⁠House ​is expected to make for more funding for the war. ​Several congressional aides have said they expect Trump to ask for $50 billion, although others have said that estimate seemed ​low.

    Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Additional reporting by Jonathan Landay; Editing by Don Durfee and David Gregorio

  • 明尼苏达州民主党议员在委员会冲突中暗示研究“入店行窃的好处”,随后称系讽刺言论


    戴夫·平托后来为其引发争议的言论辩护,称是讽刺过了头,此前共和党议员对此表示震惊

    作者:查尔斯·克里茨
    福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年3月10日 美国东部时间下午4:30

    明尼苏达州一名民主党议员在一场关于工人分类错误的听证会上,对一名共和党议员关于潜在“入店行窃好处”的言论作出反驳,他随后为这场交流辩护称是讽刺言论出了偏差。

    据当地报道,本周在明尼苏达州众议院劳动力与劳工委员会听证会上,议员们审议了关于员工和独立承包商分类法律如何影响保险支付和其他福利的信息。

    圣保罗州议员、民主党人戴夫·平托在一名共和党议员表达担忧称工人分类错误最终会让纳税人承担后果后作出回应。

    “这是一个有趣的问题系列,”平托表示,似乎在暗示要研究“入店行窃和零售盗窃的好处”。

    平托谈到了他在另一个委员会上提出的近期报告,该报告试图解决有组织零售盗窃的解决方案。

    “我实际上没有想到要问——也许这会很好——要确保他们研究一下入店行窃和零售盗窃的好处,因为也许人们依赖于此,并且以某种方式利用它,”他说。

    平托接着描述了参与此类活动的人是否被视为违法,以及此类讨论的根本可能存在政策问题。

    在接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时,平托为其言论辩护,称他是在讽刺提出原始问题的共和党议员艾萨克·舒尔茨。

    “我的评论本是讽刺性的,此前共和党议员艾萨克·舒尔茨提出需要研究工人分类错误这一非法行为是否会损害消费者,”平托说。

    “作为检察官,我当然会严肃对待零售盗窃和入店行窃。任何相反的暗示都是荒谬的——就像舒尔茨议员的言论一样。”

    尽管如此,平托的原始评论在社交媒体上被浏览数千次,并引发了其他议员的回应,同时“万湖之州”(明尼苏达州别称)正持续受到社会服务欺诈和其他丑闻的审查。

    湖岸州议员、共和党人克里斯塔·努德森在对此事的视频回应中无言以对,双手掩面。

    “对于那些被入店行窃的人来说,没有任何好处。我不知道还能说什么,”努德森说。“实际上我很震惊。我甚至不知道该说什么。谁——我不知道该说什么——谁从入店行窃中受益?是罪犯。”

    来自明尼阿波利斯地区的共和党议员克里斯汀·罗宾斯似乎提到了她所在地区全国闻名的丑闻,表示不敢相信平托会说出这样的话。

    “我们正努力防止明尼苏达州的欺诈和犯罪,这是我们多年来作为立法机构一直在处理的问题。上届会议我们终于将有组织零售盗窃犯罪纳入法律条文,”她说。

    “这是一个漫长的过程,这是我们需要用来打击全州社区这一真实问题的工具。”

    工人分类错误长期以来一直是明尼苏达州立法机构民主党-农民-劳工党议员的重点关注问题,自2024年开始推动禁止雇主错误分类员工。

    据众议院网站帖子称,这一政策据说是由一名建筑工人向议员作证后推动的,该工人在工作相关受伤后积累了高额医疗费用,但雇主后来只给他提供了少量费用补偿,并“告诉他忘了保险,改名换地址,说如果没人支付账单,最终会消失”。

    据议员网页称,该男子后来据称发现他的雇主为节省劳动力成本而错误分类员工。

    明尼阿波利斯民主党议员艾玛·格林曼起草了HF4444法案,以确保企业未来不会以这种方式行事,或错误地将员工归类为承包商等。

    “我们的工作是确保明尼苏达州工人获得法律规定的保护,”她当时表示。

    查尔斯·克里茨是福克斯新闻数字频道记者。

    他于2013年加入福克斯新闻,担任作家和制作助理。

    查尔斯负责报道福克斯新闻数字频道的媒体、政治和文化新闻。

    查尔斯是宾夕法尼亚州本地人,毕业于天普大学,获得广播新闻学士学位。新闻线索可发送至charles.creitz@fox.com。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390383834112
    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390401520112
    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390398046112

    Minnesota Dem suggests studying ‘benefit of shoplifting’ in committee clash, then says it was sarcasm

    Dave Pinto later defended his viral remarks as sarcasm gone wrong after Republican lawmakers expressed shock

    By Charles Creitz
    Fox News

    Published March 10, 2026 4:30pm EDT

    A Minnesota Democrat whose retort to a Republican about potential “benefit[s] of shoplifting” during a hearing on worker misclassification defended the exchange as sarcasm gone awry.

    During a Minnesota House Workforce and Labor Committee hearing this week, lawmakers reviewed information on how laws governing employee and independent contractor classifications affect insurance payments and other benefits, according to local reports.

    State Rep. Dave Pinto, D-St. Paul, responded after a Republican lawmaker voiced concern that worker misclassification ultimately falls on the taxpayer.

    “It is an intriguing line of questions,” Pinto said, appearing to suggest a study on the “benefit of shoplifting and retail theft.”

    Pinto spoke of a recent presentation before another committee he sits on that sought to address solutions to organized retail theft.

    “And it actually had not occurred to me to ask — it probably would have been good — to make sure that they would study sort of the benefit of shoplifting, of retail theft since because perhaps people are relying on that and sort of using that maybe it’s you know assisting them in some way,” he said.

    Pinto went on to describe whether people involved in such activities are considered to be violating the law, and that there may be a policy question at the root of such a discussion.

    In comments to Fox News Digital, Pinto defended the remarks, saying he was reacting sarcastically to Rep. Isaac Schultz, R-Mille Lacs, who had posed the original question.

    “My comments, intended to be sarcastic, followed a line of questioning from Republican Rep. Isaac Schultz suggesting a study is needed on whether the illegal practice of worker misclassification harms consumers,” Pinto said.

    “As a prosecutor, of course I take retail theft and shoplifting seriously. Any insinuation to the contrary is absurd — just like Rep. Schultz’s remarks were.”

    Nonetheless, Pinto’s original comment was viewed thousands of times on social media and elicited responses from other lawmakers, amid ongoing scrutiny over social services fraud and other scandals in the Land of 10,000 Lakes.

    State Rep. Krista Knudsen, R-Lake Shore, was rendered speechless in a video response to the matter, as she put her hands to her face.

    “There are no benefits to shoplifting for the people that are being shoplifted from. I have no idea what else to say,” Knudsen said. “I’m shocked, actually. I don’t even know what to say. Who — I don’t know what to say — Who benefits from shoplifting? The criminals.”

    State Rep. Kristin Robbins, a Republican from the Minneapolis area, appeared to cite her region’s nationally recognized scandals, saying she cannot believe the comment was made by Pinto.

    “[W]e are trying to prevent fraud and prevent crime in Minnesota and this has been an issue that we’ve dealt with as a legislature for many years. We finally got the organized retail theft crime in statute last session,” she said.

    “It’s been a long haul and that’s a tool that we need to crack down on this real problem throughout our communities around the state.”

    Worker misclassification has been a focus of Democrat-Farmer-Labor lawmakers in the state legislature for some time, as an effort began in 2024 to ban employers from misclassifying employees.

    That policy was reportedly spurred by a construction worker who testified before lawmakers that he racked up major medical bills after a work-related injury, but his employer later only offered him a small amount for expenses and “told him to forget about insurance and to change his name and address, saying the bills would eventually disappear if nobody paid them,” according to a post on the House of Representatives website.

    The man later allegedly found out his employer was misclassifying employees in order to save on labor costs, according to the lawmakers’ page.

    State Rep. Emma Greenman, D-Minneapolis, authored HF4444 to ensure businesses don’t act in such a way in the future and/or misclassify employees as contractors or the like.

    “Our job is to ensure that Minnesota workers have the protections that we in law provide,” she said at the time.

    Charles Creitz is a reporter for Fox News Digital.

    He joined Fox News in 2013 as a writer and production assistant.

    Charles covers media, politics and culture for Fox News Digital.

    Charles is a Pennsylvania native and graduated from Temple University with a B.A. in Broadcast Journalism. Story tips can be sent to charles.creitz@fox.com.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390383834112
    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390401520112
    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390398046112

  • 美国共和党议员发表反穆斯林言论遭批评后加倍强硬表态


    By 卡尼什卡·辛格(Kanishka Singh)
    2026年3月10日 美国东部时间晚上9:27 更新于2小时前

    节点运行失败

    众议员安迪·奥格尔斯(R-TN)于2024年12月19日在美国华盛顿国会山就美国救济法案投票前对记者发表讲话。该法案在众议院以174票对235票未获通过。路透社/安娜·罗斯·莱登 [购买许可权,新标签页打开]

    华盛顿,3月10日(路透社) – 美国共和党众议员安迪·奥格尔斯(Andy Ogles)周二在发表”穆斯林不该属于美国社会”的言论引发广泛谴责,并被一个穆斯林权益组织认定为”反穆斯林极端分子”后,态度愈发强硬。

    以下是相关细节:

    路透社伊朗简报通讯为您提供伊朗战争最新动态与分析。在此注册。

    • 加州州长加文·纽森(Gavin Newsom)等民主党高层以及众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯(Hakeem Jeffries)等民主党要员称这些言论”令人作呕”且充满伊斯兰恐惧症。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    • 美国穆斯林权益组织”美国伊斯兰关系委员会”(Council on American-Islamic Relations)表示,鉴于奥格尔斯在社交媒体上的言论,已将其认定为”反穆斯林极端分子”。该组织长期记录美国境内针对穆斯林和阿拉伯人的偏见事件。
    • 奥格尔斯周一在社交平台X上称:”穆斯林不该属于美国社会。多元文化主义是个谎言。”
    • 他周二进一步呼吁驱逐美国的穆斯林:”穆斯林无法融入(美国社会),他们都必须离开。”
    • 多年来,权益倡导者认为伊斯兰恐惧症的根源可追溯至2001年9月11日的恐怖袭击;而近期则与反移民情绪、白人至上主义以及以色列在加沙战争的影响有关。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    • 穆斯林权益组织此前也曾谴责过共和党议员,如美国众议员兰迪·法恩(Randy Fine)的反穆斯林言论。
    • 他们还批评了共和党总统唐纳德·特朗普政府对移民的打压以及对亲巴勒斯坦抗议活动的处置。
    • 共和党众议院议长迈克·约翰逊(Mike Johnson)周二在对记者发言时,拒绝对奥格尔斯的言论表示谴责。

    华盛顿报道;斯蒂芬·科茨编辑

    我们的标准:汤森路透信托原则 [新标签页打开]

    Republican US lawmaker doubles down after criticism of his anti-Muslim comments

    By Kanishka Singh
    March 10, 2026 9:27 PM UTC Updated 2 hours ago

    节点运行失败

    Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) speaks to reporters ahead of a vote to pass the American Relief Act on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., December 19, 2024. The legislation failed to pass the House in a 174-235 vote. REUTERS/Anna Rose Layden [Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab]

    WASHINGTON, March 10 (Reuters) – Republican U.S. Representative Andy Ogles doubled down on Tuesday after saying “Muslims don’t ​belong in American society,” which had sparked ‌widespread condemnation and prompted a Muslim advocacy group to designate him as an “anti-Muslim extremist.”

    Here are some details:

    The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

    • Top Democrats like ​California Governor Gavin Newsom and House of ​Representatives Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called those comments “disgusting” ⁠and Islamophobic.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad

    • Muslim advocacy group Council on American-Islamic ​Relations, which documents anti-Muslim and anti-Arab bias in the ​U.S., said it designated Ogles as “an anti-Muslim extremist” after his social media comments.

    • “Muslims don’t belong in American society. Pluralism is ​a lie,” Ogles said on X on ​Monday.

    • He called for expulsion of Muslims from the U.S. on Tuesday. “Muslims ‌are ⁠unable to assimilate; they all have to go back,” he posted.

    • Over the years, rights advocates have attributed Islamophobia to the September 11, 2001 attacks; and more ​recently to anti-immigration sentiment, ​white supremacy ⁠and the fallout of Israel’s war in Gaza.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    • Muslim advocacy groups have also previously ​condemned Republican lawmakers like U.S. Representative Randy ​Fine ⁠for their anti-Muslim comments.

    • They have also criticized the crackdown by Republican President Donald Trump’s administration on immigration and pro-Palestinian protests.

    • Republican ⁠House ​of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson, ​in comments to reporters on Tuesday, declined to condemn Ogles’ remarks.

    Reporting ​by Kanishka Singh in Washington; Editing by Stephen Coates

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 总统能降低汽油价格吗?特朗普有5种可选方案


    2026-03-10T17:24:00-0400 / CBS新闻

    自2月28日美国与伊朗开战后,油价已飙升约20%,导致全国燃油成本进一步上涨。特朗普总统正在权衡多项降低油价的方案。但专家表示,鉴于冲突可能持续数月,他抑制能源成本的选择有限。

    “目前并没有太多有效的调控手段,”GasBuddy石油分析师帕特里克·德哈恩(Patrick De Haan)告诉CBS新闻,”他能做的最大举措是努力恢复并增强对霍尔木兹海峡的信心。”

    能源和安全专家确实一致认为,降低石油和天然气价格最有效的方法是结束与伊朗的冲突,退而求其次则是通过军事手段确保霍尔木兹海峡的安全——这一关键水道处理全球20%的石油供应。不过,如果伊朗在海峡部署水雷,确保该水道安全可能会变得更加困难。

    短期来看,对石油交易商和其他能源投资者进行舆论引导可能是特朗普最有效的工具。周一,在他告诉CBS新闻”与伊朗的战争’非常全面’”后,油价大幅下跌,至少暂时缓解了人们对冲突长期化的担忧。

    以下是特朗普政府可能用来抑制汽油价格和其他能源成本的其他措施。

    释放战略石油储备


    战略石油储备(SPR)成立于20世纪70年代,旨在建立石油应急基金,以缓冲1973-74年石油禁运对经济造成的冲击。根据美国能源部,当石油供应中断(如自然灾害)时,总统和美国能源部长均可授权释放储备油。

    《金融时报》报道,周一,七国集团(G7)财长召开会议,讨论通过国际能源署(IEA)储备协调释放石油。摩根大通大宗商品分析师指出,SPR和IEA储备加起来每天可释放约120万桶石油,但这”无法抵消霍尔木兹海峡运输中断可能造成的潜在损失”,他们估计后者可能很快达到每天1200万桶。

    德哈恩指出,释放SPR至少可以进一步冷却市场。但他表示,如果不确保霍尔木兹海峡安全,这一策略不太可能将油价降至美国和以色列上月末袭击伊朗前的水平。

    疫情期间,拜登政府在2022年总共释放了约2亿桶原油,这是美国历史上最大规模的储备释放。财政部称,这一举措与当时其他国家的石油释放行动协调配合,使美国汽油价格每加仑降低了17至42美分。美国在1991年海湾战争、2005年卡特里娜飓风和2011年利比亚战争期间也动用过战略石油储备。

    限制美国石油出口


    美国能源信息署(EIA)数据显示,美国已成为主要石油出口国,日均向全球输送约1020万桶石油,这一数量超过其进口量,使美国成为石油净出口国。

    摩根大通指出,特朗普总统在国家紧急状态下有权限制原油出口。短期内,这可能通过将美国本土生产的原油留在国内来帮助降低国内油价。

    然而,分析师们表示,从长远来看,这种做法可能适得其反,削弱国内石油生产的经济激励,导致全球供应进一步趋紧,重新给全球和美国燃油成本带来压力。

    暂停联邦和州汽油税


    联邦政府目前对汽油征收每加仑18.4美分的税,对柴油征收24.4美分的税,这些收入用于资助公路信托基金。暂时暂停这些税收可能会缓解燃油价格上涨。

    但由于这些税收是美国国税局(IRS)税法的一部分,国会必须通过一项法律来暂停征收——鉴于华盛顿特区的党派分歧,这一障碍极高。

    摩根大通认为,更可行的选择是美国各州自行暂停或削减燃油税。因为州级燃油税从每加仑15美分到超过50美分不等,暂停州税将”为消费者提供短期缓解”。

    但弊端是:用于维护道路的税收收入将减少。

    豁免《琼斯法案》


    《琼斯法案》要求在美国港口之间运输的货物必须使用美国建造、悬挂美国国旗并由美国船员驾驶的船只运输。

    特朗普政府如果认为出于国防需要或紧急情况,可以暂停该法案。

    摩根大通分析师表示:”将战略石油储备释放与《琼斯法案》的临时豁免相结合,会使政策更有效。”

    放松夏季汽油规则


    联邦法规要求加油站在6月1日至9月15日期间停止销售E15混合燃料,因为其乙醇含量更高,在炎热天气下更容易蒸发,可能加剧空气污染。

    由于E15比其他混合燃料便宜,特朗普政府可以暂时放宽这一规定。这在过去也曾实施过:美国环保署(EPA)去年夏天发布了紧急豁免,允许在温暖月份销售E15。

    摩根大通指出:”此类豁免通过允许更高比例的乙醇混合,有效增加了可用汽油总量,在燃料市场紧张时期,这可以适度扩大供应并帮助缓解加油站价格压力。”

    不过,他们补充说,这对汽油价格的整体影响将是”有限的”。

    —玛丽·坎宁安报道

    Can the president bring down gas prices? Here are 5 options available to Trump.

    2026-03-10T17:24:00-0400 / CBS News

    President Trump is weighing several options to lower oil prices, which have surged about 20% since the U.S. war with Iran began on Feb. 28, driving up fuel costs higher across the country. But his options for reining in energy costs are limited, especially if the conflict continues for months, experts said.

    “There’s not a whole lot of levers that are going to be influential at this point,” Patrick De Haan, petroleum analyst at GasBuddy, told CBS News. “The biggest thing he could do is work towards is getting and boosting confidence in the Strait of Hormuz.”

    Indeed, energy and security experts agree that the most effective means of reducing oil and gas prices would be to end the Iran conflict or, less ambitiously, militarily secure the Strait of Hormuz — the vital waterway that handles 20% of the world’s oil supply. Yet securing the channel could become harder if Iran deploys naval mines in the strait.

    In the short-term, jawboning oil traders and other energy investors may be Mr. Trump’s most effective tool. Oil prices fell sharply on Monday after he told CBS News that the war with Iran is “very complete,” at least temporarily allaying concerns about a drawn-out conflict.

    Here are other measures the Trump administration could use to reel in gas prices and other energy costs.

    Tap the Strategic Petroleum Reserve


    The Strategic Petroleum Reserve was formed in the 1970s to act as an oil emergency fund with the idea of cushioning the economy from the kind of shockwaves caused by the 1973-74 oil embargo. The SPR is intended to be tapped when oil supplies are disrupted, such as in a natural disaster.

    The president and the U.S. energy secretary can both authorize releases from the SPR, according to the Department of Energy. On Monday, finance ministers from the G7 nations met to discuss a coordinated release of petroleum through the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) reserves, the Financial Times reported.

    Together, the SPR and the IEA could release about 1.2 million barrels a day, according to JPMorgan commodity analysts. But, they added, “it would not offset potential losses” from halted shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, which they estimate could soon reach 12 million barrels per day.

    Tapping the SPR could at least further cool markets, De Haan noted. But without securing the Strait of Hormuz, the strategy is unlikely to bring oil back down to their prices before the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran late last month, he said.

    During the pandemic, the Biden administration in 2022 released a total of roughly 200 million barrels of crude from the SPR to curb skyrocketing gas prices — the largest such release in U.S. history. According to the Treasury Department, the move — in coordination with oil releases by other countries at the time — reduced gas prices in the U.S. by 17 to 42 cents per gallon.

    The U.S. also tapped the reserve during the 1991 Gulf War, Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the war in Libya in 2011.

    Restrict U.S. oil exports


    The U.S. has become a major oil exporter, sending an average of about 10.2 million barrels of petroleum per day across the globe, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. That outpaces the amount of oil it imports, making the U.S. a net oil exporter.

    President Trump has the legal authority to restrict exports of crude oil during a national emergency, according to JPMorgan. In the short term, that could help reduce domestic oil prices by keeping U.S.-produced crude within its borders.

    Over the longer term, however, that approach could backfire by weakening the economic incentives behind domestic oil production, the analysts said. That would lead to tighter global supplies and renew pressure on global and U.S. fuel costs.

    Pause federal and state taxes


    The federal government currently levies a tax of 18.4 cents per gallon on gas and 24.4 cents for diesel, revenue that’s used to finance the Highway Trust Fund. Temporarily suspending those taxes could ease fuel prices.

    But because these taxes are part of the IRS tax code, Congress would have to pass a law suspending them — a high hurdle given the partisan divide in Washington, D.C.

    A more plausible option would be for individual U.S. states to suspend or cut fuel taxes, according to JPMorgan. Because state fuel taxes range from 15 cents to more than 50 cents per gallon, state suspensions would “provide short-term relief for consumers,” they noted.

    The downside: less tax revenue to maintain roads.

    Waive the Jones Act


    The Jones Act requires goods shipped between U.S. ports to be moved on ships that are U.S.-built, U.S.-flagged and U.S.-crewed.

    The Trump administration could suspend the law if it’s deemed necessary for national defense or due to emergencies.

    “Combining a release from the SPR with a temporary waiver of the Jones Act would make the policy more effective,” the JPMorgan analysts said.

    Relax summer gas rules


    Federal rules require gas stations to stop selling a blend called E15 from June 1 to Sept. 15 because its higher ethanol content means it evaporates more easily in hot weather, which can contribute to air pollution.

    Because E15 is cheaper than other blends, the Trump administration could temporarily relax the regulation. That’s been done before. The Environmental Protection Agency last summer issued an emergency waiver allowing E15 to be sold in the warmer months.

    “Such waivers effectively increase the available gasoline pool by allowing higher ethanol blending, which can modestly expand supply and help ease pressure on pump prices during periods of tight fuel markets,” JP Morgan noted.

    However, the overall impact on gas prices would be “limited,” they added.

    —With reporting by Mary Cunningham.