博客

  • 缅因州民主党参议院初选愈演愈烈,该党力争在关键竞选中击败苏珊·柯林斯


    2026年3月17日 / 美国东部时间上午6:27 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    缅因州正上演一场激烈的民主党初选,两名候选人争夺挑战五届共和党参议员苏珊·柯林斯的机会,柯林斯是即将到来的中期选举中共和党最脆弱的现任议员之一。

    这场竞选将现任温和派州长珍妮特·米尔斯与进步派激进分子格雷厄姆·普拉特纳(Graham Platner)对立起来。普拉特纳是一名牡蛎养殖者、退伍军人和前私人军事承包商,近几个月来势头强劲。这也是一场代际之争:78岁的米尔斯强调她在全州范围内的获胜记录,而41岁的普拉特纳则将自己塑造为局外人候选人。

    该州的民调有限,但最近的一些调查显示,普拉特纳在民主党初选中领先于米尔斯。根据联邦申报文件,普拉特纳的竞选团队可能还在资金上占据优势,去年筹集了约780万美元,而米尔斯筹集了260万美元,柯林斯筹集了460万美元。不太知名的民主党候选人大卫·科斯特洛(David Costello)仅筹集了略超2.1万美元(不含贷款)。

    这场竞选是今年最受关注的参议院竞选之一,民主党有望在中期选举中获得参议院席位,这是一个难得的机会。鉴于这场竞选的高度关注度和全国性影响,它肯定会吸引大量外部资金投入。

    这场高风险的竞选引发了攻击升级,米尔斯竞选团队周二发布了一则负面广告,突出普拉特纳据称在网络论坛Reddit上发表的争议性言论。

    广告引用了普拉特纳2013年的言论,称关注强奸问题的女性”不该那么愚蠢,以至于最终和不想要的人发生性关系”,并说”看在上帝的份上,表现得像个成年人”。

    据熟悉该竞选媒体策略的消息人士透露,这笔六位数的广告投放覆盖全州广播、有线电视和流媒体平台。

    哥伦比亚广播公司新闻已联系普拉特纳竞选团队寻求置评。

    普拉特纳此前为这些帖子中的许多内容道歉。当被问及与强奸相关的言论时,他去年告诉《大西洋月刊》,自己”非常尴尬”。

    “对于那些读过这些内容并感到冒犯的人,对于那些看到一个陌生的我而感到不适的人,我深表歉意,”普拉特纳在10月的一段视频中表示,称这些帖子是”我人生早期写的”。他补充说,一些帖子反映了他在海军陆战队服役伊拉克和国民警卫队服役阿富汗期间经历的抑郁和创伤后应激障碍,当时军队中常见这种”粗俗幽默”。

    普拉特纳的Reddit历史自去年秋天以来一直引发争议,当时美国有线电视新闻网和其他几家新闻媒体发现了他的帖子,其中他据称自称共产主义者,称警察为”混蛋”,并似乎认同农村白人有种族主义和愚蠢的观点。

    去年,普拉特纳还因被发现有一个类似纳粹标志的纹身而受到审查。他表示,此后已遮盖了该纹身,称这是近20年前在克罗地亚一个酗酒之夜纹的,当时并未意识到它有纳粹含义。

    社交媒体帖子和纹身加剧了党内争议,而两位主要民主党候选人在竞选活动中都将大量公开宣传重点放在攻击柯林斯上。

    受欢迎的州长米尔斯是参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默(Chuck Schumer)的重要招募对象。在竞选期间,她强调自己作为地方检察官、总检察长和两届州长的记录——2022年以55%的得票率击败前共和党州长保罗·莱佩奇(Paul LePage)连任。她还誓言要与特朗普总统抗争,去年在白宫活动中与总统就跨性别运动员问题激烈交锋,引起全国关注。

    “法庭见,”在特朗普威胁要切断对缅因州的资金支持后,米尔斯对总统说道。

    但米尔斯成为党内基层要求代际变革的目标。在普拉特纳去年发布的一则广告中,一名未具名人士表示,”米尔斯是个好州长,但我认为现在是时候变革了。”他还称这场竞选是一场关于”旧思想与新思想”的”代际竞赛”。

    普拉特纳发起了一场反叛式竞选,试图吸引民主党内的民粹主义和进步派势力。普拉特纳及其盟友认为,尽管民主党最近民调仍不受欢迎,但需要一个更具对抗性的候选人,不仅要挑战特朗普和共和党人,还要挑战党内建制派。

    虽然米尔斯获得了舒默的支持,但普拉特纳获得了包括亚利桑那州参议员鲁本·加列戈(Ruben Gallego)和佛蒙特州参议员伯尼·桑德斯(Bernie Sanders)在内的多名民主党核心小组成员的背书。他还得到了美国汽车工人联合会和缅因州护士协会的支持。

    6月民主党初选的获胜者将对阵柯林斯,柯林斯已在参议院代表缅因州近三十年。

    柯林斯是民主党重点打击目标,他们需要翻转四个共和党席位才能获得参议院多数席位——这一目标难度极大,因为今年涉及的大多数共和党席位都位于深红州。缅因州倾向民主党,特朗普2024年在全州范围内以9个百分点的优势领先民主党,但柯林斯仍在共和党中表现强势。2020年,尽管竞选支出仅为民主党对手萨拉·吉迪恩(Sara Gideon)的一半,柯林斯仍以8.6个百分点的优势击败对手,而特朗普在该州以9个百分点的劣势输给民主党。

    柯林斯是一个终身缅因人,来自该州最北端、最偏远的郡,她塑造了自己作为愿意与特朗普和共和党领导人决裂的温和派形象,并在全州拥有深厚的地方关系。多年来,柯林斯一直让民主党感到棘手:2020年,尽管竞选支出仅为民主党对手萨拉·吉迪恩的一半,她仍以8.6个百分点的优势击败对手,而特朗普在该州以9个百分点的劣势输给民主党候选人。

    Maine Democratic Senate primary grows increasingly bitter as party vies to unseat Susan Collins in key race

    March 17, 2026 / 6:27 AM EDT / CBS News

    A bitter Democratic primary is unfolding in Maine as two candidates battle for the chance to challenge five-term Republican Sen. Susan Collins, one of the GOP’s most vulnerable incumbents in the upcoming midterm elections.

    The race pits a centrist sitting governor, Janet Mills, against a progressive firebrand, Graham Platner, an oyster farmer, military veteran and former private military contractor who has built momentum in recent months. It’s also a generational contest, with the 78-year-old Mills pointing to her track record of winning statewide while 41-year-old Platner casts himself as an outsider candidate.

    Polling in the race is limited, but some recent surveys show Platner leading Mills among Democratic primary voters. Platner’s campaign may also have a financial edge, raising some $7.8 million last year compared to Mills’ $2.6 million and Collins’ $4.6 million, according to federal filings. Less well-known Democratic candidate David Costello has raised just over $21,000, not including loans.

    The race is one of this year’s most closely watched Senate contests, a rare opportunity for the party to pick up a seat in the chamber in the midterms. It is sure to draw significant outside spending, given the intense interest in the race and its national stakes.

    The high-stakes contest has triggered an escalation in attacks, with the Mills campaign unveiling a negative ad Tuesday that highlights controversial statements allegedly made by Platner on the online forum Reddit.

    The ad quotes Platner writing in 2013 that women concerned about rape should “not get so fed up they wind up having sex with someone they don’t mean to” and should “act like an adult for fs sake.”

    According to sources familiar with the campaign’s media strategy, the six-figure ad buy is running statewide across broadcast, cable and streaming platforms.

    CBS News has reached out to representatives of Platner’s campaign for comment.

    Platner has previously apologized for many of those posts. Asked about the rape-related comment, he told The Atlantic last year that he was “f***ing embarrassed.”

    “For those of you who have read these things and been offended, have read these things and seen someone that you don’t recognize, I am deeply sorry,” Platner said in an October video, saying the posts were written “in an earlier part of my life.” He added that some of the posts echoed the “crude humor” that was common in military circles, and reflected the depression and post-traumatic stress disorder that he faced after his time in Iraq with the Marine Corps and in Afghanistan with the National Guard.

    Platner’s Reddit history has drawn controversy since last fall, when CNN and several other news outlets uncovered posts in which he allegedly called himself a communist, referred to cops as “bastards” and appeared to agree with the sentiment that rural White people are racist and stupid.

    Platner has also faced scrutiny after it was revealed last year that he had a tattoo that resembled a Nazi symbol. He said he has since covered up the tattoo, which he says he got during a night of heavy drinking in Croatia almost two decades ago and didn’t realize it had any Nazi connotations.

    The social media posts and tattoo have fueled intra-party controversy in a race where both major Democratic candidates have focused much of their public messaging on attacking Collins.

    Mills, a popular governor, was a top recruit of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. During the campaign, she has pointed to her record as a district attorney, attorney general and two-term governor — winning reelection in 2022 with 55% of the vote against former GOP Gov. Paul LePage. She has also vowed to fight President Trump, drawing national attention last year, when she verbally sparred with the president about transgender athletes at a White House event.

    “See you in court,” Mills said to Mr. Trump after he threatened to cut off funding to Maine.

    But Mills is a target for calls for generational change from the party’s base. In one Platner ad released last year, an unnamed person says Mills “was a good governor, but I think it’s time for change.” He has also called the contest a “generational race” about “old ideas vs new ideas.”

    Platner has run an insurgent campaign, seeking to appeal to the populist and progressive wings of the Democratic Party. Platner and his allies have argued that Democrats, who are still unpopular in recent polls, need a more confrontational candidate willing to not only challenge Mr. Trump and Republicans, but also buck the party establishment.

    While Mills has Schumer’s backing, Platner has picked up endorsements from several members of the Democratic caucus, including Sens. Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Bernie Sanders of Vermont. He’s also drawn endorsements from the United Auto Workers and the Maine State Nurses Association.

    The winner of the Democratic primary in June will face off against Collins, who has represented Maine in the Senate for nearly three decades.

    Collins is a top target for Democrats, who need to flip four GOP-held seats in order to take a majority in the Senate, a tall order since most of the Republican-held seats at play this year are in deep-red states. Maine leans Democratic, with Mr. Trump losing statewide by 7 percentage points in 2024.

    But defeating Collins is not necessarily an easy task. The lifelong Mainer — who hails from the state’s northernmost and most isolated county — has carved out an identity as a moderate who is willing to break with Mr. Trump and GOP leaders, and she has deep local ties throughout the state. Collins has vexed Democrats for years: She won reelection in 2020 by 8.6 points even as Mr. Trump lost in the state by 9 points, despite spending half as much money as Democratic opponent Sara Gideon.

  • 美军武器与兵力大举调往中东 印太防线拉响“真空”警报


    发布时间:2026年3月17日 18:54
    来源:联合早报

    (蒙特利尔/华盛顿/东京综合讯)美伊战事持续升级,美国近日接连从印太及其他地区抽调军舰、先进武器及军事人员支援中东。这一重大的战略转移已引发亚洲防务官员的关注,担忧若战事演变成持久战,将严重影响印太区域的战略平衡及防卫能力。

    原派驻日本的的黎波里号两栖攻击舰已航经南中国海,正朝中东方向前进,并随舰部署约2500名海军陆战队员。海上追踪数据显示,这艘军舰星期二(3月17日)已航行至马六甲海峡一带。

    美国智库战略与国际研究中心(CSIS)高级顾问坎西安(Mark Cancian)指出,此次部署属于重大军事行动,“美国似乎意识到单靠轰炸无法完全保护商船免受无人机和导弹袭击”。

    坎西安认为,这支部队最可能执行的任务,是协助重开霍尔木兹海峡,例如夺取航道附近小岛并在岛上部署防空系统。

    先进防空系统撤出日韩

    为了填补中东的防御缺口,美军不惜动用驻守在东亚的关键资产。

    消息指出,原本部署在韩国星州郡基地的五辆“萨德”反导系统发射车,正运往中东。韩国媒体也证实,美军大型运输机在本月7日和8日频繁起降,将驻韩美军的爱国者拦截系统运往沙特阿拉伯和阿联酋。

    美三分一舰艇集结中东

    在海上部署方面,美国目前约有三分之一的水面舰艇集结于中东。

    除了的黎波里号两栖攻击舰,原本驻守日本横须贺基地的两艘驱逐舰也已接令调往阿拉伯海。

    日本一名前官员称,虽然美军未必会撤走驻日的航空母舰,但更令人担忧的是爱国者导弹数量减少,因为这类导弹的生产周期极长,填补库存往往需要数年时间,这将直接影响印太地区的战备能力。

    36小时耗尽年产量 美军拦截导弹库存告急

    自冲突爆发以来,伊朗已向相关目标发射逾500枚弹道导弹,使美军的拦截弹药库存面临严峻压力。

    尽管美国国防巨头洛克希德·马丁每年仅能生产约620枚爱国者导弹,但据美国佩恩公共政策研究所估算,在战争爆发的头36小时内,美军和波斯湾国家便消耗了近600枚拦截弹。

    此外,美军关键雷达装备的损失,也显示美方反导体系已面临一定压力。本月早些时候,伊朗的一次打击摧毁了部署在约旦、价值约3亿美元(约3亿8000万新元)的“萨德”雷达系统。

    据英国广播公司(BBC)报道,美国目前在全球共部署八套萨德系统,其中两套位于中东的约旦和以色列;阿联酋和沙特阿拉伯合计拥有三套,整体资源相对有限。

    面对外界对“印太防御真空”的质疑,五角大楼官员在受询时说,美国战争部不会讨论具体武器系统的调动或部署,但称美军在履行全球职责的同时,将保留遏制印太地区侵略行为的能力。

    美军武器与兵力大举调往中东 印太防线拉响“真空”警报

    发布时间:2026年3月17日 18:54
    来源:联合早报

    (蒙特利尔/华盛顿/东京综合讯)美伊战事持续升级,美国近日接连从印太及其他地区抽调军舰、先进武器及军事人员支援中东。这一重大的战略转移已引发亚洲防务官员的关注,担忧若战事演变成持久战,将严重影响印太区域的战略平衡及防卫能力。

    原派驻日本的的黎波里号两栖攻击舰已航经南中国海,正朝中东方向前进,并随舰部署约2500名海军陆战队员。海上追踪数据显示,这艘军舰星期二(3月17日)已航行至马六甲海峡一带。

    美国智库战略与国际研究中心(CSIS)高级顾问坎西安(Mark Cancian)指出,此次部署属于重大军事行动,“美国似乎意识到单靠轰炸无法完全保护商船免受无人机和导弹袭击”。

    坎西安认为,这支部队最可能执行的任务,是协助重开霍尔木兹海峡,例如夺取航道附近小岛并在岛上部署防空系统。

    先进防空系统撤出日韩

    为了填补中东的防御缺口,美军不惜动用驻守在东亚的关键资产。

    消息指出,原本部署在韩国星州郡基地的五辆“萨德”反导系统发射车,正运往中东。韩国媒体也证实,美军大型运输机在本月7日和8日频繁起降,将驻韩美军的爱国者拦截系统运往沙特阿拉伯和阿联酋。

    美三分一舰艇集结中东

    在海上部署方面,美国目前约有三分之一的水面舰艇集结于中东。

    除了的黎波里号两栖攻击舰,原本驻守日本横须贺基地的两艘驱逐舰也已接令调往阿拉伯海。

    日本一名前官员称,虽然美军未必会撤走驻日的航空母舰,但更令人担忧的是爱国者导弹数量减少,因为这类导弹的生产周期极长,填补库存往往需要数年时间,这将直接影响印太地区的战备能力。

    36小时耗尽年产量 美军拦截导弹库存告急

    自冲突爆发以来,伊朗已向相关目标发射逾500枚弹道导弹,使美军的拦截弹药库存面临严峻压力。

    尽管美国国防巨头洛克希德·马丁每年仅能生产约620枚爱国者导弹,但据美国佩恩公共政策研究所估算,在战争爆发的头36小时内,美军和波斯湾国家便消耗了近600枚拦截弹。

    此外,美军关键雷达装备的损失,也显示美方反导体系已面临一定压力。本月早些时候,伊朗的一次打击摧毁了部署在约旦、价值约3亿美元(约3亿8000万新元)的“萨德”雷达系统。

    据英国广播公司(BBC)报道,美国目前在全球共部署八套萨德系统,其中两套位于中东的约旦和以色列;阿联酋和沙特阿拉伯合计拥有三套,整体资源相对有限。

    面对外界对“印太防御真空”的质疑,五角大楼官员在受询时说,美国战争部不会讨论具体武器系统的调动或部署,但称美军在履行全球职责的同时,将保留遏制印太地区侵略行为的能力。

  • 美军会进驻伊朗吗?美国人的看法及这意味着什么


    发布时间:2026-03-17T11:00:34.223Z / 来源:CNN政治

    分析由

    [Aaron Blake]

    29分钟前

    发布于 2026年3月17日,美国东部时间上午7:00

    唐纳德·特朗普 中东 选举 民调

    [查看所有主题]

    Facebook 推文[电子邮件]链接 话题

    链接已复制!

    总统唐纳德·特朗普于3月16日在椭圆形办公室发表讲话,副总统JD·万斯陪同。

    Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

    “我们无意进行长期冲突,”副总统JD·万斯在2025年6月美国对伊朗核设施实施空袭数小时后表示。随后他补充道:“我们无意派遣地面部队。”

    然而,在对伊朗展开更广泛战争两周多后的今天,政府的调子已经变了,拒绝排除这种可能性。总统唐纳德·特朗普不再像过去那样淡化这一想法,而且越来越多的战略因素让人怀疑这可能成为可行选项。

    如果特朗普真的这么做,这既表明这场战争已走向他未曾预料的方向,也表明这已成为巨大的政治风险。

    自上月对伊朗发动首次打击以来开展的民调显示,总体而言,美国人对地面部队进驻伊朗的想法完全不接受——甚至对共和党选民基础来说也很难被说服。

    尽管近期历史表明,这一群体可能会在某种程度上对这一想法有所接受,但特朗普甚至在争取许多支持者的信任方面也在冒更大的风险。

    但似乎有越来越多的理由表明,至少会有少量地面部队被部署到伊朗领土上——无论是为了夺取伊朗的核材料;接管政府近期打击的战略要地霍姆兹海峡附近的哈尔克岛;还是控制霍尔木兹海峡周边地区以帮助重启载油船只的通行。(正如CNN报道的那样,要捕获被认为深埋地下的高浓缩铀储备,需要大量地面部队,远不止特种作战部队的规模。)

    3月4日,美国海军人员在亚伯拉罕·林肯号航空母舰的飞行甲板上支持“史诗狂怒行动”。

    US Navy

    特朗普近日对有关可能性的问题变得不耐烦,但明确表示这是他保留的选项,这与九个月前不同。

    我们还在周末得知,政府正在向中东部署一个海军陆战队远征部队,这是一个通常包括2500名海军陆战队员和水手的快速反应部队,部署原因不明。

    美国驻联合国大使迈克·沃尔茨周日告诉福克斯新闻:“这不会是另一个2003年的伊拉克。不会有成千上万的部队占领某个地方的城市地区。”

    但他表示,军方正在为特朗普提供选项,“训练有素、装备精良、处于准备状态,随时准备执行他作为总司令选择的任何任务。”

    特朗普也不像两周前那样淡化这种可能性了,当时他向《纽约邮报》描述这是一种“可能不需要他们”或“如果必要的话”的情况。

    美国民众似乎确实希望不需要地面部队。

    战争开始后不久进行的一项[CNN民调]显示,美国人反对派遣地面部队的比例为5:1,反对率60%,支持率12%。

    同样,后来的一项[昆尼皮亚克大学民调]显示,登记选民中这一比例接近4:1:74%反对,20%支持。

    在这两项民调中,即使是共和党人——他们近几个月从21世纪初的立场回到了更鹰派的态度——也以两位数的比例反对这一想法。

    在CNN的民调中,只有27%的共和党人支持这一想法;在昆尼皮亚克大学的民调中,只有37%的登记共和党选民支持。

    这些数字在背景下是有道理的。对特朗普之前军事行动的民调——2025年6月的伊朗打击行动和他1月推翻委内瑞拉总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗的行动——显示,相当一部分美国人对短暂军事打击持接受态度,但通常不会接受更多。1月在委内瑞拉反对地面部队的情绪与今天伊朗的情况相似。

    这种情况当然可能改变。我们之前看到,共和党人在特朗普推行军事行动后,可能会改变之前反对的立场。

    但同样明显的是,共和党对特朗普对伊朗战争的支持虽然广泛但不够深入。CNN民调显示,77%的共和党人支持早期打击行动,但只有37%的人“强烈”支持。

    我们还看到,这场战争正日益分裂共和党的意见领袖阶层——这种现象可能随时间影响到基层。右翼知名人士警告特朗普,这场战争有撕裂其联盟的风险。

    值得注意的是,我们看到一些共和党国会议员几乎似乎在预先警告特朗普不要派遣地面部队。

    佛罗里达州参议员里克·斯科特上周向CNN坚称,特朗普“对地面部队不感兴趣”。田纳西州众议员蒂姆·伯切特也告诉CNN,特朗普知道公众对此没有“兴趣”。其他如南卡罗来纳州众议员南希·梅斯和密苏里州参议员乔希·霍利则敦促特朗普采取不同的路线。

    而路易斯安那州参议员约翰·肯尼迪一如既往地言辞生动,3月8日告诉福克斯新闻:“如果他派遣部队,你听到的闷响将是我摔倒的声音,因为我会晕倒。”

    这些共和党人可能和美国公众的初步反应一样,担心这种行动的长期影响。毕竟,地面部队会增加更多美军伤亡的可能性。

    这将是冲突开始呈现出更多传统战争特征的时刻,而美国人已明确表示不愿参与此类战争。

    但公众反对并没有阻止特朗普,那么为什么现在会阻止呢?

    唐纳德·特朗普 中东 选举 民调

    [查看所有主题]

    Facebook 推文[电子邮件]链接 话题

    链接已复制!

    US troops in Iran? What Americans think, and what it would mean

    Published Time: 2026-03-17T11:00:34.223Z / Source: CNN Politics

    Analysis by

    [Aaron Blake]

    29 min ago

    PUBLISHED Mar 17, 2026, 7:00 AM ET

    Donald Trump The Middle East Election polls

    [See all topics]

    Facebook Tweet[Email]Link Threads

    Link Copied!

    President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office on March 16, alongside Vice President JD Vance.

    Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

    “We have no interest in a protracted conflict,” Vice President JD Vance said in June 2025, hours after the United States [carried out airstrikes] on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Then he added: “We have no interest in boots on the ground.”

    The administration is singing a different tune today, refusing to rule out that prospect more than two weeks into a more extensive war against Iran. President Donald Trump isn’t downplaying the idea like he once did, and there are increasing strategic reasons to suspect it might be a viable option.

    Should Trump go there, it would be both a sign that this war has gone in directions he didn’t seem to anticipate and that is has become a massive political risk.

    Polling conducted since the first strikes against Iran last month suggests the idea of troops on the ground is a complete nonstarter for Americans overall — and even a tough sell for the GOP base.

    And while recent history suggests that base might warm to the idea, at least somewhat, Trump is pushing his luck with even many of those supporters.

    But there appear to be increasing reasons that at least a small amount of ground forces could be deployed on Iranian soil — whether that be to seize Iran’s nuclear materials; to take over strategically important [Kharg Island], which the administration recently targeted; or to seize territory around the [Strait of Hormuz] to help restart the passage of ships carrying oil. (As CNN has [reported], capturing the highly enriched uranium stockpile believed to be deep underground would require a significant troop presence, well beyond a special operations footprint.)

    US sailors on the flight deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln in support of Operation Epic Fury on March 4.

    US Navy

    Trump has gotten testy with questions about the possibility in recent days but made clear it’s an option he is reserving, unlike nine months ago.

    We also learned over the weekend that the administration is [deploying a Marine Expeditionary Unit], a rapid response unit that usually includes 2,500 Marines and sailors, to the Middle East for unexplained reasons.

    US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz told Fox News on Sunday that “this isn’t going to be another 2003 Iraq. There are not going to be hundreds of thousands of troops occupying urban areas somewhere.”

    But he said the military is providing options to Trump “to have forces that are trained, equipped, in position and ready for whatever he chooses to do as commander in chief.”

    And Trump isn’t downplaying the possibility as much as he did two weeks ago, when he [described it to the New York Post] as a “probably don’t need them” or an “if they were necessary”-type situation.

    The American people sure seem to hope ground troops are not needed.

    A [CNN poll] conducted shortly after the war began showed Americans opposed sending ground troops by a 5-to-1 margin, 60%-12%.

    Similarly, a later [Quinnipiac University poll] put the margin at nearly 4-to-1 among registered voters: 74%-20%.

    In both polls, even Republicans — who have in recent months [returned to their more hawkish ways] from the early 21st century — opposed the idea by double-digits.

    Just 27% of Republicans favored the idea in the CNN poll; just 37% of registered GOP voters did so in the Quinnipiac poll.

    And those numbers make sense in context. Polls of Trump’s previous military moves — the June Iran strikes and his ouster of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in January — suggested a decent-sized minority of Americans were OK with brief military strikes [but often not much more]. And [opposition to boots on the][ground in Venezuela] in January was similar to where it is today in Iran.

    That could certainly change. We’ve seen before how Republicans who previously opposed the idea of military action can shift their views once Trump pursues those actions.

    But it’s also pretty clear that the GOP support for Trump’s war against Iran, such as it exists, is [wide but shallow]. The CNN poll showed 77% of Republicans supported the early strikes, but only 37% did so “strongly.”

    We’ve also seen how the war is increasingly dividing the GOP’s influencer class — a phenomenon that [can trickle down to the base over time]. Prominent right-wing figures are warning Trump that this war risks tearing apart his coalition.

    And notably, we’re seeing some congressional Republicans almost seem to preemptively warn Trump against putting boots on the ground.

    Sen. Rick Scott of Florida insisted to CNN last week that Trump “has no interest in troops on the ground.” Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee likewise told CNN that Trump knew there was no “appetite” for such a thing. Others, such as [Rep. Nancy Mace] of South Carolina and [Sen. Josh Hawley] of Missouri, are urging Trump to chart a different course.

    And Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana, as usual, was the most colorful, telling Fox News on March 8 that “if he sends in troops, the thud you hear will be me face-planting, because I fainted.”

    These Republicans may fear the long-term implications of such a move as much as the initial reaction from the American public. Boots on the ground, after all, would raise the prospects for many more US casualties.

    It would be the point at which this conflict risks taking on the characteristics of a more traditional war, the likes of which Americans have made very clear they want no part.

    But public opposition hasn’t stopped Trump before, so why would it now?

    Donald Trump The Middle East Election polls

    [See all topics]

    Facebook Tweet[Email]Link Threads

    Link Copied!

  • 特朗普推动选民ID法案在参议院面临考验,共和党反叛者威胁阻挠法案通过


    发布于2026年3月17日 美国东部时间上午6:00 | 更新于2026年3月17日 美国东部时间上午6:00

    参议院共和党人正准备在本周就特朗普支持的、注定失败的选民ID法案展开激烈的全院辩论。

    南达科他州共和党参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩(John Thune)预计将于周二下午启动共和党针对《保障美国选民资格(SAVE)法案》的全院策略。

    尽管唐纳德·特朗普总统和狂热的保守派影响者群体施加压力要求进行冗长辩论,但这一策略不会被采用。原因是共和党内部没有足够的支持来贯彻这一行动。

    [参议院共和党人着眼于责任归咎游戏,特朗普支持的SAVE法案即将失败]

    “这关乎数学计算,”图恩表示,”无论好坏,我都必须清醒地认识到我们能在这里取得什么成果。因此我们将继续传达这一立场。我认为我们将在全院进行辩论并进行投票。”

    共和党人的计划是让参议院民主党人明确记录下否决该法案的投票,而民主党人准备配合这一行动。

    “民主党不会让唐纳德·特朗普强行通过这项法案。本周不会,永远不会,”纽约州民主党参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默(Chuck Schumer)在周末与记者的电话会议中表示,”民主党将确保美国人民有机会在今年秋季的选举中表达他们的裁决。”

    除了这将占用大量全院辩论时间外,共和党人内部的分歧在于,如果采取冗长辩论策略,他们没有足够统一的立场来阻止可能大幅修改法案的民主党修正案。

    推动参议院SAVE法案的关键人物之一、佛罗里达州共和党参议员里克·斯科特(Rick Scott)承认,共和党人”目前没有足够的票数来进行冗长辩论”。

    “我们只需要,嗯,我们需要寻找各种可能的方式来尝试通过它,”斯科特表示。

    [共和党人达到特朗普支持的选民ID法案所需的关键50票门槛,参议院斗争迫在眉睫]

    不过,周二的首个程序性步骤只需要简单多数票,但可能仍需要副总统JD·万斯(JD Vance)打破平局提供支持。

    在整个可能持续数天的过程中,参众两院都有几位关键议员值得关注。

    北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯(Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C.)

    北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯上周宣布他不会支持《SAVE美国法案》,并计划”尽我所能阻止它甚至推进”。

    在漫长的全院辩论中这一立场将如何发挥作用还有待观察。

    不过,考虑到共和党在参议院的微弱优势,蒂利斯对该法案的反对尤为引人注目。

    他更愿意就激励各州采用选民ID的立法进行投票,并警告称特朗普希望对法案进行的额外修改,如禁止男性参加女子体育赛事或在有限例外情况下停止邮寄选票,”听起来不像是让那些冲锋在前的人——也就是那些寻求连任的人——来定义我们下周应该投票的内容。”

    阿拉斯加州共和党参议员丽莎·穆尔科斯基(Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska)

    阿拉斯加州共和党参议员丽莎·穆尔科斯基早些时候就反对《SAVE美国法案》,并声称”华盛顿特区的一刀切规定在阿拉斯加这样的地方很少奏效”。

    “选举日即将临近,”穆尔科斯基在2月份表示,”现在施加新的联邦要求,而各州已经深入准备工作,这将通过迫使选举官员仓促遵守新政策(很可能没有必要的资源)来对选举完整性产生负面影响。”

    她是否会投票允许共和党人开启对该法案的辩论并推进一系列修正案仍是未知数。福克斯新闻数字版尚未立即收到她办公室的置评请求。

    宾夕法尼亚州民主党参议员约翰·费特曼(Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa.)

    宾夕法尼亚州民主党参议员约翰·费特曼经常在参议院关键投票中与本党立场不同,他支持选民ID但不认同特朗普要求的一些修改。

    费特曼在”与玛丽亚晨间秀”中表示,《SAVE美国法案》”不必要地复杂”,特别是特朗普要求全面禁止邮寄选票(除有限例外)。

    “我说过这不是吉姆·克劳式的(Jim Crow,指美国历史上的种族隔离制度),也不是极端措施,但邮寄投票绝对安全,”费特曼称,”该国一些最好的例子是像佛罗里达和俄亥俄这样的红州。”

    众议院共和党人

    与此同时,在众议院,图恩的共和党同僚中正在酝酿一场反叛。

    那里的几位共和党议员威胁要在参议院通过SAVE法案之前,对任何来自参议院的立法投反对票,这在当前情况下可能导致长期僵局。

    [点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序]

    这些威胁中的许多最早在本月早些时候的众议院共和党议员专属电话会议上浮现,当时美国和以色列对伊朗进行了联合打击。

    威斯康星州共和党众议员德里克·范奥登(Derrick Van Orden)是推动众议院在该法案被审议前拒绝任何参议院法案的议员之一,他告诉议长迈克·约翰逊(Mike Johnson),根据电话会议中的多位消息来源,”如果我们不完成这项工作,或者至少表现出一些决心,我们就完了。中期选举已经结束了。”

    亚历克斯·米勒(Alex Miller)是福克斯新闻数字版报道美国参议院的记者。

    伊丽莎白·埃尔金德(Elizabeth Elkind)是福克斯新闻数字版的政治编辑。新闻线索可发送至elizabeth.elkind@fox.com,或在Twitter上@elizabeth_elkind。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390997291112

    Trump voter ID push faces Senate test as GOP rebels threaten to sink bill

    Published March 17, 2026 6:00am EDT | Updated March 17, 2026 6:00am EDT

    Senate Republicans are gearing up for a floor fight this week over doomed Trump-backed voter ID legislation.

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., is expected to launch the GOP’s floor strategy for the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act on Tuesday afternoon.

    It won’t be done through the talking filibuster, despite pressure from President Donald Trump and a fervent ecosystem of conservative influencers to do so. That’s because there is not enough support among Republicans to follow through with the move.

    [SENATE GOP EYES BLAME GAME AS TRUMP-BACKED SAVE ACT HEADS FOR DEFEAT]

    “It’s about the math,” Thune said. “And I’m, for better or worse, the one who has to be a clear-eyed realist about what we can achieve here. And so we’ll continue to convey that. And I think that we’re going to have the fight on the floor. We’re going to vote on this.”

    Republicans’ plan is to put Senate Democrats on record for voting down the bill. And Senate Democrats are primed to oblige.

    “Democrats will not let Donald Trump ram this bill through the Senate. Not this week, not ever,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said on a call with reporters over the weekend. “And Democrats are going to make sure the American people have their chance to deliver their verdict at the elections this fall.”

    Part of the issue among Republicans, outside the staggering amount of floor time it would take up, is that the GOP isn’t unified to block Democratic amendments that could drastically alter the bill if they went the route of the talking filibuster.

    Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., who is one of the key voices pushing for the SAVE America Act in the Senate, acknowledged that Republicans “don’t have the votes for the talking filibuster right now.”

    “We just got to, you know, we got to look at every way we can try to pass it,” Scott said.

    [GOP REACHES KEY 50-VOTE THRESHOLD FOR TRUMP-BACKED VOTER ID BILL AS SENATE FIGHT LOOMS]

    Still, the first procedural step on Tuesday will take a simple majority but may still need an assist from Vice President JD Vance to break a tie.

    And throughout the process, which could stretch over several days, there will be a handful of key lawmakers to watch in both chambers.

    Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C.

    Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., declared last week that he wouldn’t support the SAVE America Act and that he planned to “do everything I can to prevent it from even moving forward.”

    How that could play out during the lengthy floor battle remains to be seen.

    Still, Tillis’ objection to the bill is notable, given Republicans’ thin margin for error in the upper chamber.

    He would rather vote on legislation that incentivized states to adopt voter ID and warned that the additional changes to the bill Trump wanted, like barring men in women’s sports or halting mail-in ballots with limited exceptions, “doesn’t sound like we’re letting the people at the tip of the spear — that’s these people running for re-election — define what we should be voting on next week.”

    Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska

    Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, came out early against the SAVE America Act and contended that “one-size-fits-all mandates from Washington, D.C., seldom work in places like Alaska.”

    “Election Day is fast approaching,” Murkowski said in February. “Imposing new federal requirements now, when states are deep into their preparations, would negatively impact election integrity by forcing election officials to scramble to adhere to new policies, likely without the necessary resources.”

    Whether she’ll vote to allow Republicans to open debate on the bill and march forward with their slew of amendments is still an open question. Fox News Digital did not immediately hear back from her office for comment.

    Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa.

    Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., who often bucks his party on key votes in the Senate, likes the idea of voter ID but isn’t on board with some of the changes demanded by Trump.

    Fetterman said on “Mornings with Maria” that the SAVE America Act was “needlessly complicated,” particularly Trump’s request to include a sweeping ban on mail-in ballots with limited exceptions.

    “I have said it’s not Jim Crow, and it’s not extreme things, but mail-in voting is absolutely secure,” Fetterman said. “Some of the best examples in the country are red states like Florida and Ohio.”

    House GOP

    Meanwhile, in the House, a rebellion is brewing among Thune’s fellow Republicans.

    Several GOP lawmakers there are threatening to vote against any legislation that comes out of the Senate until the SAVE America Act is passed, which, given the circumstances, could lead to a lengthy standoff.

    [CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP]

    Many of those threats first bubbled up earlier this month on a House GOP lawmaker-only call, following the U.S. and Israel’s joint strikes on Iran.

    Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis., was among those pushing the House to reject any bills from the Senate until the measure was taken up, telling Speaker Mike Johnson, according to multiple sources on the call, “If we don’t get this done, or at least show that we’ve got some backbone, we’re done. The midterms are over.”

    Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.

    Elizabeth Elkind is a politics editor for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to elizabeth.elkind@fox.com and on Twitter @elizabeth_elkind.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390997291112

  • 特朗普将在白宫举办大型活动 围绕EPA生物燃料强制掺混量决策展开


    更新于:2026年3月17日 / 美国东部时间上午7:44 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    总统特朗普已邀请农民和生物燃料生产商下周前往白宫参加一场大型活动,该行业正等待政府就燃料添加剂强制掺混量发布公告。

    知情人士向哥伦比亚广播公司新闻透露,这场”农业庆典”活动定于3月27日在白宫南草坪举行。

    邀请函中写道:”本月晚些时候,在全国农业周之后,特朗普总统计划在南草坪接待来自全国各地的数百名农民和牧场主,让那些生产我们的粮食、纤维和燃料的人们成为焦点。”

    美国环境保护署(EPA)对生物燃料的决定预计将于3月底公布。

    可再生体积义务(RVO)规定了必须掺入国家燃料供应中的生物燃料(如玉米基乙醇和生物柴油)数量。

    由于市场猜测本月晚些时候将做出RVO决定,下周的会议可能会对市场产生影响。

    此次活动正值白宫和更广泛的共和党努力在中期选举前留住其关键联盟成员——农业行业和农业家庭,其中包括乔治亚州、爱荷华州、蒙大拿州、北卡罗来纳州和德克萨斯州等农业州的昂贵竞选活动,这些州的众议院和参议院竞选需要共和党选民的强劲支持。但全国各地的农业社区因总统的关税政策而受到不利影响,因为全球贸易伙伴为报复更高关税而缩减了大豆等农产品的采购量。

    政府还决定允许进口高达8万吨低关税、低质量牛肉(来自阿根廷),以帮助降低食品价格,这激怒了牧场主,他们认为这一决定将损害国内生产和销售。

    白宫发言人未立即置评。

    Trump hosting big White House event around EPA’s biofuels mandates decision

    Updated on: March 17, 2026 / 7:44 AM EDT / CBS News

    President Trump has invited farmers and biofuels producers to the White House for a big event next week as the industry awaits the government’s announcement on mandates for the fuel additives.

    The “celebration of agriculture” event is scheduled for March 27 on the White House South Lawn, sources familiar with the planning told CBS News.

    The invitation said: “Later this month, following National Agriculture Week, President Trump plans to host hundreds of farmers and ranchers from around the country on the South Lawn to shine a spotlight on the men and women growing our food, fiber, and fuel.”

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s decision on biofuels is expected around the end of March.

    The renewable volume obligations, or RVOs, mandate how much biofuel, such as corn-based ethanol and biodiesel, must be blended into the nation’s fuel supply.

    Next week’s meeting could have an impact on the markets amid speculation on the RVO decision coming later this month.

    The event comes as the White House and broader Republican Party works to keep key elements of its coalition — the agricultural industry and farming families — on board ahead of the midterm elections, including expensive contests in farming states Georgia, Iowa, Montana, North Carolina, and Texas, where House and Senate races will require strong GOP turnout. But farming communities nationwide have been adversely affected by the president’s tariff policy, as global trading partners scaled back agricultural purchases like soybeans in retaliation for higher levees.

    The administration also decided to allow the up to 80,000 metric tons of low-tariff, lower-quality beef from Argentina to be imported to help keep grocery prices down, angering cattle ranchers who argue the decision will hurt domestic production and sales.

    White House spokespeople didn’t immediately comment.

  • 新闻


    抱歉,这个问题未找到相关结果。

    中国外交部称中美就特朗普访华时间保持沟通 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年3月17日 16:15

    中国外交部称中美就特朗普访华时间保持沟通

    美国总统特朗普(左)星期一(3月16日)受访时说,为处理中东战事,他已向中国国家主席习近平(右)表明希望推迟访华行程约一个月。图为两人去年10月在韩国釜山元首峰会后继续交谈。 (路透社档案照)

    美国总统特朗普接连两天受访时表示,将推迟访华行程。中国外交部对此回应时称,中美就总统特朗普访华事宜保持着沟通。

    美国全国广播公司(NBC)记者星期二(3月17日)在中国外交部例行记者会上提问,美国官员在何时首次提出推迟或延后两国元首会晤?此外,是否有其他国家元首曾提出过这类延期请求?鉴于这类高层互访通常涉及大量筹备工作,重新安排这次访问的时间表是怎样的?

    中国外交部发言人林剑应询时说,“中美双方就特朗普总统访华时间等问题保持着沟通。目前我没有可以进一步提供的信息。”

    NBC记者追问中美就特朗普访华事宜保持沟通,能否透露沟通了哪些日期?林剑称,“我没有可以进一步提供的信息”。

    针对此前有报道指,特朗普称如果中国不在霍尔木兹海峡护航问题上提供协助,他将推迟访华,林剑回应询问时说,“我们注意到,美方已就媒体的不实报道公开作出澄清,表示有关报道是完全错误的,强调访问与霍尔木兹海峡通航问题无关。”

    特朗普星期天(15日)接受英国《金融时报》访问时首次暗示美中元首峰会可能推迟,他指出最终决定可能取决于中国是否会协助重开霍尔木兹海峡。

    美国财政部长贝森特过后说,习特会若真的推迟,不会是因为中方拒绝促使海峡重开。

    特朗普星期一(16日)在白宫对记者说,为处理中东战事,他已向中国国家主席习近平要求推迟访华行程约一个月。

    在中东战事发生前,特朗普一直表明期待访华。根据美方计划,特朗普将于3月31日至4月2日访问中国。

  • 消息:伊朗最高领袖态度强硬拒和谈 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年3月17日 19:26

    一名伊朗高级官员星期二(3月17日)称,最高领导人穆杰塔巴在首次外交政策会议上对美国和以色列的报复立场“非常强硬和严肃”,但他并未说明穆杰塔巴是否亲自出席了会议。 (法新社档案照片)

    一名伊朗高级官员说,伊朗最高领导人穆杰塔巴拒绝两个中间国家提出缓和紧张局势或与美国停火的提议。

    路透社报道,这名官员星期二(3月17日)称,穆杰塔巴在首次外交政策会议上对美国和以色列的报复立场“非常强硬和严肃”,但他并未说明穆杰塔巴是否亲自出席了会议。

    另一名高级官员说,穆杰塔巴曾说过,“只有美国和以色列屈服、接受战败并支付赔偿金,才是实现和平的合适时机”。

    3月14日,三名消息人士告诉路透社,美国总统特朗普政府拒绝中东盟友提出的旨在结束伊朗战争的外交谈判。

    美以对伊战争已进入第三周,造成至少2000人死亡,且看不到缓和迹象。霍尔木兹海峡仍然基本封闭,美国盟友拒绝协助重新开放这条关键水道的请求,导致能源价格上涨,并引发人们对通货膨胀的担忧。

    消息:伊朗最高领袖态度强硬拒和谈 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年3月17日 19:26

    一名伊朗高级官员星期二(3月17日)称,最高领导人穆杰塔巴在首次外交政策会议上对美国和以色列的报复立场“非常强硬和严肃”,但他并未说明穆杰塔巴是否亲自出席了会议。 (法新社档案照片)

    一名伊朗高级官员说,伊朗最高领导人穆杰塔巴拒绝两个中间国家提出缓和紧张局势或与美国停火的提议。

    路透社报道,这名官员星期二(3月17日)称,穆杰塔巴在首次外交政策会议上对美国和以色列的报复立场“非常强硬和严肃”,但他并未说明穆杰塔巴是否亲自出席了会议。

    另一名高级官员说,穆杰塔巴曾说过,“只有美国和以色列屈服、接受战败并支付赔偿金,才是实现和平的合适时机”。

    3月14日,三名消息人士告诉路透社,美国总统特朗普政府拒绝中东盟友提出的旨在结束伊朗战争的外交谈判。

    美以对伊战争已进入第三周,造成至少2000人死亡,且看不到缓和迹象。霍尔木兹海峡仍然基本封闭,美国盟友拒绝协助重新开放这条关键水道的请求,导致能源价格上涨,并引发人们对通货膨胀的担忧。

  • 伊朗红新月会:战争爆发以来逾4万民用设施遭到袭击


    发布时间:2026年3月17日19:53 / 来源:联合早报

    3月16日,伊朗首都德黑兰一栋住宅楼遇袭倒塌,救援人员到场展开救援工作。(路透社)

    伊朗红新月会国际事务副主席阿利什万迪说,自2月28日美国和以色列对伊朗发动军事打击以来,已有4万6370处民用设施遭到袭击。

    阿利什万迪日前接受新华社采访时说,其中2万9146处是位于伊朗各省的住宅,近1万处位于首都德黑兰。

    阿利什万迪说,袭击也涉及医疗和教育机构,而伊朗红新月会的17个中心遭到破坏,该协会的一架救援直升机也遇袭摧毁,另有10名伊朗红新月会工作人员受伤,一人死亡。

    另外,美以对教育机构的袭击已造成206人死亡154人受伤

    阿利什万迪说,伊朗红新月会每天都会记录美国和以色列违反国际人道主义法的证据,“在武装冲突中,不应袭击平民,例如儿童、学生和老人,以及包括住宅和学校在内的目标”。

    他说,该协会随时准备接受国际人道主义援助,包括供应不足的药品、医疗用品和设备等。

    伊朗红新月会:战争爆发以来逾4万民用设施遭到袭击

    发布时间:2026年3月17日19:53 / 来源:联合早报

    3月16日,伊朗首都德黑兰一栋住宅楼遇袭倒塌,救援人员到场展开救援工作。(路透社)

    伊朗红新月会国际事务副主席阿利什万迪说,自2月28日美国和以色列对伊朗发动军事打击以来,已有4万6370处民用设施遭到袭击。

    阿利什万迪日前接受新华社采访时说,其中2万9146处是位于伊朗各省的住宅,近1万处位于首都德黑兰。

    阿利什万迪说,袭击也涉及医疗和教育机构,而伊朗红新月会的17个中心遭到破坏,该协会的一架救援直升机也遇袭摧毁,另有10名伊朗红新月会工作人员受伤,一人死亡。

    另外,美以对教育机构的袭击已造成206人死亡,154人受伤。

    阿利什万迪说,伊朗红新月会每天都会记录美国和以色列违反国际人道主义法的证据,“在武装冲突中,不应袭击平民,例如儿童、学生和老人,以及包括住宅和学校在内的目标”。

    他说,该协会随时准备接受国际人道主义援助,包括供应不足的药品、医疗用品和设备等。

  • 新闻


    请您提供需要翻译的英文新闻文章,我将按照要求为您进行高质量的简体中文翻译。

    No English content available

  • 民主党人喜欢马克韦恩·穆林,但这并不意味着他们会投票支持他担任国土安全部部长


    发布于 2026 年 3 月 17 日,美国东部时间凌晨 4:00 | 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)政治版

    作者:[劳伦·福克斯]、[莎拉·费里斯]、[普莉希拉·阿尔瓦雷斯]

    4 小时前


    民主党参议员约翰·费特曼(左)在 2026 年 3 月 12 日美国国会大厦投票期间,在电梯中向共和党参议员马克韦恩·穆林(右)示意。

    安娜·莫尼梅克/盖蒂图片社

    穆林在国会早期,曾在众议院议场上将西装外套和领带与牛仔裤搭配穿着。时任众议院议长约翰·博纳(John Boehner)因这位年轻共和党人的着装违反规定而对其提出了批评。

    他初到华盛顿时的着装或许显得与众不同,但这位 48 岁的参议员——他仍会偶尔戴着牛仔帽主持参议院会议——自那时起已学到了许多。

    自 2013 年来到华盛顿以来,穆林在国会山塑造了一个直来直去的形象,他曾是综合格斗(MMA)选手,作为罕见的两党斗士,既能在福克斯新闻上宣扬白宫的宣传话术,又能偶尔与民主党人达成交易。这位和蔼可亲的俄克拉荷马州人花了数十年时间在美国国会两院建立了紧密的联系——这最终帮助他跻身总统的核心圈子。

    如今,穆林被提名为唐纳德·特朗普总统的国土安全部部长,这一职位要求他执行总统标志性的移民政策承诺,而该政策已成为该党在中期选举前最大的政治负担之一。同时,他也将面临考验,看看自己在执行特朗普的指令时,能否在多大程度上保持“局外人”的身份。

    穆林将于周三在参议院国土安全委员会接受质询,距离他突然被任命担任此职仅两周,而距离他若获得确认将领导的国土安全部因党派斗争而陷入停摆已过去一个多月。

    如今坐在质询席对面的穆林,预计将面临参议院民主党人的严厉盘问——其中一些人与他有着多年的友谊,但在当下分裂的移民政治氛围中,他们承受着强烈的反对压力。

    “通常情况下,被提名担任内阁职务的参议员都会获得确认。但在这个违反法律、传统、道德和宪法执行移民执法的政府中,这一职位的确认过程充满高度争议,”特拉华州民主党参议员克里斯·库恩斯(Chris Coons)告诉 CNN。“尽管马克韦恩很受欢迎,但他将面临更高的确认门槛,这不是因为他本人,而是因为这个职位和总统。”

    俄亥俄州前众议院议长约翰·博纳在 2013 年 1 月 3 日为众议员马克韦恩·穆林进行模拟宣誓就职。

    查尔斯·达拉帕克/美联社/档案照片

    从某种意义上说,穆林已经成为特朗普民粹主义信息的化身。他父亲生病后,他辍学接管了家族的管道生意,后来获得了副学士学位。

    但他也被证明是一位精明的政治家。穆林不仅与特朗普结盟,还与其他关键领导人建立了联系,与当时的议长凯文·麦卡锡建立了友谊,并坚决支持南达科他州共和党参议员约翰·图恩竞选参议院多数党领袖。

    尽管他有时风格浮夸,但许多民主党人表示,很难不与穆林相处融洽。如今,穆林掌管着参议院著名的“糖果桌”,两党议员都可以前来享用糖果(作为健身爱好者的穆林,经常被看到提着巨大的糖果袋前往参议院会议厅)。

    已有数名民主党人表示不会投票支持他。他们认为,国土安全部——一个拥有超过 26 万名员工的部门——的领导层变动,不会对机构的方向产生太大改变,尤其是在许多人看来,白宫高级助手斯蒂芬·米勒和边境负责人汤姆·霍曼才是推动政府在全国范围内执行移民政策的核心人物。

    “穆林不是问题所在,”亚利桑那州民主党参议员鲁本·加列戈(Ruben Gallego)表示。“问题在于,我不确定穆林是否会真正掌权。”

    穆林从未在移民政策方面拥有广泛管辖权的委员会任职,但这位特朗普的亲信和电视常客反复重复政府的宣传话术。在明尼阿波利斯发生阿历克斯·普雷蒂(Alex Pretti)致命枪击事件后,他在福克斯新闻上称这位 ICU 护士是一个“精神失常的人”,“带着上膛的手枪进来造成最大破坏”。

    其他民主党人则希望穆林能以某种方式与特朗普划清界限,这将给他们投票支持他的理由。但对于这位在国会山建立了与总统步调一致品牌的议员来说,这本质上不太可能。

    例如,在 2021 年 1 月 6 日,穆林是少数几位在众议院会议厅阻止特朗普支持者闯入国会大厦的议员之一。当晚,当许多人谴责特朗普试图挑战选举结果的行为“越界”时,穆林投票反对推翻乔·拜登当选总统的 2020 年选举结果。

    同事们表示,穆林与总统的联系比几乎任何其他普通议员都要紧密。南达科他州共和党众议员达斯蒂·约翰逊(Dusty Johnson)在穆林刚当选众议院议员时曾受其指点,他能回忆起几次穆林在餐桌上突然离席接特朗普电话的场景。

    约翰逊称,正是穆林这种自嘲的幽默感、务实的态度和作为沟通者的本能,使他在特朗普的华盛顿站稳了脚跟。

    “如果你想找一个永远说安全套话的圆滑政客,马克韦恩不是那个人,”约翰逊说。“他完全真实,不摆架子,不会躲在自己认为你希望他扮演的角色后面。你可以接受或不接受马克韦恩·穆林的真实模样。”

    参议员马克韦恩·穆林于 2026 年 1 月 28 日抵达美国国会参加每周的参议院共和党政策午餐会。

    安娜·莫尼梅克/盖蒂图片社/档案照片

    斗士

    新泽西州民主党人乔希·戈特海默(Josh Gottheimer)2017 年刚当选国会议员时,他的伙伴——当时的马萨诸塞州众议员乔·肯尼迪(Joe Kennedy)邀请他加入众议院健身房的一个健身小组。

    他遇到了这位混合武术选手兼前摔跤手,对方当时正在指导这个小组,并且“把他打得落花流水”。

    几天后,戈特海默在众议院会议厅注意到穆林就在几英尺外,穿着西装领带。他转向肯尼迪,这时才意识到这位训练刻苦的健身小组领导者也是一名国会议员。

    这个著名的高强度小组——仅热身环节就包括 120 个俯卧撑、30 个引体向上和 50 个开合跳——已经持续了十多年。

    同事们表示,在国会走廊里,穆林总是步履匆匆,从一个会议到另一个会议时,能看到他不停地拍打着一个橡胶球。

    但这种同样的行动倾向有时也让穆林陷入麻烦。

    在上个月的国情咨文演讲中,正是穆林试图故意从民主党众议员阿尔·格林(Al Green)手中抢走抗议标语。

    2023 年的一次参议院听证会上,穆林甚至向国际卡车司机兄弟会主席发出身体对抗的挑战,让对方“站起来”,直到佛蒙特州参议员伯尼·桑德斯插话:“你是美国参议员。”

    2021 年阿富汗冲突即将结束时,穆林两次试图进入该国,以营救被困在那里的美国人,而当时无论是共和党还是民主党领导人都反对这一行动。

    同事们表示,穆林那种亲自处理事情的本能,在国会山可能显得突兀和不寻常,但对于国土安全部而言或许是有用的。

    “马克韦恩在国会山以一种‘直视你眼睛,承诺并兑现’的形象著称,而这正是我们在国土安全部所需要的,”北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯(Thom Tillis)说。“我的意思是,如果你了解马克韦恩,你就会看到他在这里走来走去,他真的会被任何工作人员强迫进入他不想去的职位吗?绝对不会。”

    同事们称,就像总统一样,穆林不是一个细节控或政策专家,但他确实理解当下的政治,并已成为国会两院之间某种非官方的联络人。

    去年夏天,他在帮助参议院共和党人、白宫与希望将州和地方税收减免纳入总统标志性国内政策一揽子计划的蓝州共和党人之间弥合分歧方面发挥了关键作用。(这或许也得益于穆林在华盛顿的室友是众议院税收委员会主席、密苏里州众议员杰森·史密斯。)

    接受 CNN 采访的不止一位议员表示,他们曾受邀到穆林家参加会议或晚宴。

    “他是个真正的实干家,是那种喜欢把事情搞定的人,”戈特海默评价他的同事,两人在拜登政府期间曾密切合作推动乌克兰援助法案的通过。

    即使面临争议,穆林(其财务披露显示他是一位千万富翁)也一直倚仗自己的“局外人”身份。

    2018 年,当众议院伦理委员会要求穆林向家族企业偿还 4 万美元时,他辩称这“只能证明,你不能再做一名公民议员,要想在华盛顿特区任职,就必须成为一名职业政客。”

    国土安全部的新起点

    随着白宫为穆林的听证会做准备,多名国土安全部官员在经历了克里斯蒂·诺姆(Kristi Noem)领导下动荡的一年后,对这一任命表达了谨慎的乐观情绪。

    虽然许多官员仍在熟悉这位参议员、他的立场和管理风格,但据消息人士向 CNN 透露,由于他在国会的声誉,他被认为是一位能够稳定局面的人。

    特朗普政府官员预计,诺姆的离职也将为国土安全部和边境负责人汤姆·霍曼(Tom Homan)开创一个新的、更同步的时代,而霍曼此前很少与现任部长沟通。

    “这是一个有趣的选择,但国土安全部有点陷入僵局,所以这可能是必要的变革。他似乎以开放的心态对待这一职位,所以我们希望他能接受一些新的想法和方法,”倡导有限移民政策的“移民问责项目”(Immigration Accountability Project)主席克里斯·赫米伦斯基(Chris Chmielenski)表示。

    但尽管高层发生了变动,由米勒推动的特朗普移民议程核心政策预计仍将保持不变。

    毕竟,穆林长期以来一直是特朗普移民打击政策的坚定支持者,这一问题预计将成为民主党人考虑是否支持他提名的核心因素。

    加利福尼亚州民主党参议员亚历克斯·帕迪利亚(Alex Padilla)的办公室就在穆林办公室附近,他告诉 CNN,他已经计划与穆林会面,讨论他可能愿意做出的政策改变。但帕迪利亚去年曾在洛杉矶参加诺姆的活动时被强行驱离,他对穆林能在多大程度上改变国土安全部的运作格局持谨慎态度。

    “我清楚地认识到他与特朗普的密切关系,”他说。

    Democrats like Markwayne Mullin but that doesn’t mean they’ll vote for him for DHS secretary

    Published Mar 17, 2026, 4:00 AM ET | CNN Politics

    By [Lauren Fox], [Sarah Ferris], [Priscilla Alvarez]

    4 hr ago

    Democratic Sen. John Fetterman gestures to Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin as they stand in an elevator during a vote at the US Capitol on March 12, 2026.

    Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

    In his early days in Congress, Markwayne Mullin tried pairing his suit jacket and tie with a pair of jeans on the House floor. Then-House Speaker John Boehner reprimanded the young Republican for breaking the dress code.

    He might have come to Washington dressing as an outlier, but the 48-year-old – who still wears his cowboy hat on occasion to preside over the Senate floor – has learned a lot since.

    Since coming to Washington in 2013, Mullin has built a brand on Capitol Hill as a straight-talking, former MMA fighter who is the rare partisan warrior who can tout White House talking points on Fox News and then sit down to cut the occasional deals with Democrats. The affable Oklahoman has spent decades building strong connections across both chambers in the US Capitol – which eventually helped catapult him into the president’s inner circle.

    Now, Mullin is nominated to serve as President Donald Trump’s secretary of Homeland Security, a post that will require him to execute the president’s signature campaign promise on immigration, which has turned into one of the party’s biggest political liabilities heading into the midterms. He is also about to test just how much he can keep his outsider bona fides while doing Trump’s bidding.

    Mullin will sit before the Senate Homeland Security Committee Wednesday, just two weeks after he was suddenly tapped for the post and more than a month into a partisan government shutdown of the very agency that – if confirmed – he would run.

    Now on the other side of the dais, Mullin is expected to face a grilling from Senate Democrats – some of whom have years-long friendships with him but are under intense pressure to oppose him amid the fractious immigration politics of this moment.

    “There is a long tradition that senators nominated for Cabinet positions get confirmed. This is a highly charged post in an administration that has violated law, tradition, ethics and the Constitution in how they’ve carried out immigration enforcement,” Sen. Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware told CNN. “Markwayne, although well-liked, will face a higher bar because of the job and the president, not because of Markwayne.”

    House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio performs a mock swearing in for Rep. Markwayne Mullin, on January 3, 2013.

    Charles Dharapak/AP/File

    Mullin has, in some ways, come to embody Trump’s populist message. He dropped out of college to take over his family’s plumbing business when his dad got sick, later earning his associates degree.

    But he’s also proven a shrewd politician. Mullin aligned himself not only with Trump but other key leaders, forging a friendship with then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy and then advocating doggedly for South Dakota Republican Sen. John Thune in his bid for Senate majority leader.

    Despite his sometimes-bombastic style, many Democrats argue it’s hard not to get along with Mullin, who now administers the Senate’s famed candy desk where members of both parties can stop by for a sweet treat (Mullin, a fitness enthusiast, is frequently seen hauling giant bags of candy to the chamber floor).

    Already, several Democrats have signaled they won’t vote for him. They argue changing leadership at DHS – a department with more than 260,000 employees – will do little to reshape the direction of the agency, especially as many perceive top White House aide Stephen Miller and border czar Tom Homan as driving much of the administration’s enforcement actions across the country.

    “Mullin is not the problem,” Sen. Ruben Gallego, a Democrat from Arizona said. “The problem is I am not sure Mullin is going to be in charge.”

    Mullin never served on a committee with broad jurisdiction on immigration policy, but the Trump confidant and regular television surrogate has repeatedly echoed the administration’s talking points, saying on Fox News in the aftermath of the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis that the ICU nurse had been a “deranged individual” who “came in to cause max damage with a loaded pistol.”

    Other Democrats are looking for Mullin to break with Trump in a way that would give them a reason to vote for him, something that is inherently unlikely for a lawmaker who has built his brand in the US Capitol as being in lockstep with the president.

    Mullin, for example, was among a small group of House members on the floor on January 6, 2021, who blocked the chamber door as pro-Trump rioters entered the building. That night – as many derided Trump’s attempts at challenging the election as having gone too far – Mullin voted to overturn the results of the 2020 election that Joe Biden had won the presidency.

    Mullin, colleagues say, is in closer touch with the president than almost any other rank-and-file member. Rep. Dusty Johnson, a Republican from South Dakota who was taken under Mullin’s wing when he was first elected to the House, can personally recall a few dinners where Mullin has left the table to take a call from Trump.

    It’s the lawmaker’s self-deprecating humor, practicality and natural instincts as a communicator that have served him well in Trump’s Washington, Johnson said.

    “If you are looking for the smooth politician who always says the safe thing, Markwayne is not your guy,” Johnson said. “He is entirely and wholly authentic. He doesn’t put on a lot of airs. He is not hiding behind some screen of what he thinks you want him to be. You can take or leave Markwayne Mullin as he is.”

    Sen. Markwayne Mullin arrives to the weekly Senate Republican policy luncheon at the US Capitol on January 28, 2026.

    Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images/File

    The fighter

    New Jersey Democrat Josh Gottheimer had just gotten to Congress in 2017 when his buddy, then-Massachusetts Rep. Joe Kennedy, invited him to join a workout group in the House gym.

    He met the mixed-martial arts fighter and former wrestler who was running the group and, as Gottheimer remembers it, “kicking my a**.”

    A few days later, Gottheimer was on the House floor when he noticed Mullin a few feet away, wearing a suit and tie. He turned to Kennedy, and it was only then that he realized the hardcore workout leader was a member of Congress.

    That famously intense group – with a warmup alone that includes 120 pushups, 30 pull ups and 50 burpees – has continued for more than a decade.

    In the halls of Congress, Mullin, colleagues say, is regularly in motion and can be seen bouncing a rubber ball as he goes from one meeting to another.

    But it’s that same propensity for action that has sometimes landed Mullin in trouble.

    During the State of the Union address last month, it was Mullin who tried deliberately to rip a protest sign from Democratic Rep. Al Green’s hands.

    And in a 2023 Senate hearing, Mullin challenged the president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters to a physical showdown, telling him to “stand your butt up,” before Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders interjected: “You are a United States senator.”

    During the waning days of the conflict in Afghanistan in 2021, Mullin twice tried to get into the country in an effort to extract Americans there, a move that both Republican and Democratic leaders were against at the time.

    Mullin’s instinct to take things into his own hands, colleagues say, can be abrupt and unusual on Capitol Hill, but may be useful at DHS.

    “Markwayne just has a look you in the eye, commit and deliver sort of reputation around here and that is exactly what we need there,” North Carolina Republican Sen. Thom Tillis said. “I mean do you really believe if you know Markwayne, you’ve seen him walk around here, he’s really going to get bullied by any staff to move into positions he doesn’t want to? Absolutely not.”

    Like the president, Mullin isn’t a big details guy or policy wonk, his colleagues say, but he does understand the politics of the moment and has become an unofficial liaison of sorts between the two chambers on Capitol Hill.

    Last summer, he was instrumental in helping bridge a divide between the Senate GOP, the White House and blue-state Republicans in the House who wanted to raise the state and local tax deduction as part of the president’s signature domestic policy package. (It didn’t hurt that Mullin’s DC roommate is the House tax-writing chair, Missouri Rep. Jason Smith.)

    More than one member CNN interviewed for this story remarked they had personally been invited to Mullin’s home for a meeting or a dinner.

    “He’s a real dealmaker. He’s somebody who likes to get sh*t done,” Gottheimer said of his colleague who he worked closely with during the Biden administration to pass aid for Ukraine.

    Even when faced with controversy, Mullin, whose financial disclosures show he is a multimillionaire, has leaned on his outsider credentials.

    When the House Ethics Committee instructed Mullin in 2018 to pay back $40,000 to a family business, he argued it “only proves that you can no longer be a citizen legislator, you have to be a career politician to serve in Washington D.C.”

    Ready for a reset at DHS

    As the White House prepares Mullin for his hearing, multiple Homeland Security officials have described a shared feeling of cautious optimism with the selection after a tumultuous year under the direction of Secretary Kristi Noem.

    While many officials are still getting acquainted with the senator, his positions and his management style, he’s perceived – in part due to his reputation in Congress – as a steadying hand, sources told CNN.

    And Trump administration officials expect Noem’s departure will also usher in a new, more synchronized era between DHS and Homan, who rarely spoke with the current secretary.

    “It’s an interesting choice, but DHS was in a bit of a rut, so it was probably a necessary change. It seems that he’s approaching it with an open mind, so we’re hopeful that he’ll be open to some new ideas and approaches,” said Chris Chmielenski, president of the Immigration Accountability Project, which advocates for limited immigration.

    But despite change at the top, the policies at the core of Trump’s immigration agenda shepherded by Miller are expected to remain the same.

    Mullin, after all, has long been a staunch supporter of Trump’s immigration crackdown, an issue expected to become central to Democrats’ calculation on whether to back his nomination.

    Sen. Alex Padilla, a Democrat from California whose office is near Mullin’s, told CNN he already planned a meeting with Mullin to discuss what policy changes he might be open to making. But Padilla, who was forcefully removed from a Noem event in Los Angeles last year, had a sober take on how much Mullin would change the fabric of DHS.

    “It’s not lost on me how close he is to Trump,” he said.