博客

  • 联邦调查局与国税局将调查涉嫌与国内恐怖主义有关联的非营利组织,消息人士称


    2026年3月18日 / 美国东部时间下午3:21 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    消息人士向哥伦比亚广播公司新闻透露,联邦调查局(FBI)和国税局(IRS)特工正在发起一项新行动,以调查涉嫌与国内恐怖主义有关联的非营利组织。

    去年12月,司法部长帕姆·邦迪(Pam Bondi)下令执法机构和联邦检察官优先调查和起诉属于反法西斯”反法西斯主义者”(antifa)运动或被视为”极端分子”的团体和个人。

    邦迪在12月4日的备忘录中写道:”这些国内恐怖分子使用暴力或暴力威胁来推进政治和社会议程,包括反对法律和移民执法;支持大规模移民和开放边境的极端观点;坚持激进的性别意识形态、反美主义、反资本主义或反基督教。”

    该备忘录要求执法人员考虑极端主义团体可能存在的”税务犯罪”,即”涉嫌欺骗美国国税局”。

    联邦调查局发言人拒绝置评。

    司法部发言人表示:”司法部完全致力于维护法治,保护执法人员免受有组织攻击,确保每个人都能在公共场合自由发言、自由参与选举进程,并在不受暴力或伤害恐惧的情况下践行信仰,将所有从事符合国会对国内恐怖主义定义的犯罪行为的犯罪分子绳之以法。”

    一名政府官员证实了联邦调查局与国税局合作的计划,补充称重点将放在探索支持国内恐怖主义或政治暴力的非营利组织的潜在资金来源上。

    消息人士补充称,调查非营利组织的新”任务控制指挥中心”将设在联邦调查局,国税局刑事调查部门的特工将执行为期一年的临时任务。

    目前尚不清楚哪些团体可能成为调查目标,但邦迪的备忘录指示所有联邦执法机构梳理其档案中关于反法西斯团体的情报并提交给联邦调查局。

    联邦调查局还被下令制定一份从事”可能构成国内恐怖主义”行为的团体名单,联邦法律对”国内恐怖主义”的定义即为此。

    根据法律,此类个人或团体实施的是”危害人类生命的行为”,发生在美国境内,可能旨在恐吓或胁迫民众、通过恐吓影响政府政策,或通过大规模破坏、暗杀或绑架”影响政府行为”。

    尽管法律对该术语有定义,但美国法律中尚无针对国内恐怖主义的刑事指控。检察官通常以其他罪名起诉被告,并在量刑时寻求恐怖主义加重处罚。

    美国司法部国家安全部前国内恐怖主义法律顾问汤姆·布佐夫斯基(Tom Brzozowski)表示,邦迪12月备忘录中提出的调查方法令人担忧,这引发了关于联邦调查局为合法证明创建目标调查团体名单而需要何种前提条件的质疑。

    他告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻:”联邦调查人员可以随意查看开源信息。他们不需要任何特定的前提条件就能做到这一点。’如果要收集信息并将其保存在政府数据集,就必须有前提条件——尤其是如果从调查角度进行查看时。’”

    在特朗普总统9月底因一系列高调事件(包括2025年极右翼影响者查理·柯克遇刺)发布关于国内恐怖主义的行政命令后,邦迪发布了该备忘录。

    一名知情人士称,除了联邦调查局与国税局的联合行动外,司法部副部长办公室也参与成立了一个专门调查与反法西斯相关团体资金的工作组。

    消息人士补充称,美国检察官办公室也被要求指定一名国内恐怖主义协调员。

    到目前为止,涉及反法西斯组织的公开刑事案件相对较少。

    其中最引人注目的案件发生在得克萨斯州北部,本月早些时候,九名被指控属于所谓反法西斯组织的成员因使用武器和爆炸物、为恐怖分子提供物质支持、妨碍公务以及企图谋杀阿尔瓦拉多市警察和普雷里兰移民和海关执法局拘留中心的狱警而被定罪。

    在周三联邦调查局局长卡什·帕特尔(Kash Patel)与其他高级政府情报官员一起在参议院情报委员会就全球威胁举行年度听证会时,”反法西斯主义者”(antifa)并未被提及,在2026年美国情报界未分类年度威胁评估中也未被引用。

    帕特尔定于周四在众议院情报委员会就全球威胁举行第二次听证会,这是两场听证会中的第二场。

    去年12月,在众议院国土安全委员会听证会上,一名联邦调查局高级官员作证称,反法西斯主义是最大威胁之一,但在回答关于该组织的结构、为何被联邦调查局定性等问题时却显得吃力。

    FBI and IRS to investigate nonprofit groups for domestic terrorism links, sources say

    March 18, 2026 / 3:21 PM EDT / CBS News

    FBI and IRS agents are forming a new initiative to investigate nonprofit organizations over suspected possible links to domestic terrorism, sources briefed on the matter told CBS News.

    In December, Attorney General Pam Bondi ordered law enforcement agencies and federal prosecutors to prioritize efforts to investigate and prosecute groups and individuals who belong to the anti-fascist antifa movement or are deemed “extremist.”

    “These domestic terrorists use violence or the threat of violence to advance political and social agendas, including opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity,” Bondi wrote in the Dec. 4 memo.

    The memo asked law enforcement agents to consider potential “tax crimes” in which extremist groups are “suspected of defrauding the Internal Revenue Service.”

    A spokesperson for the FBI declined to comment.

    “The Department of Justice is fully committed to preserving the rule of law, protecting law enforcement from coordinated attacks, ensuring everyone has the freedom to speak in the public square, participate freely in the electoral process, and practice their faith without fear of violence or harm, and bringing to justice the full range of criminal actors engaged in criminal conduct matching Congress’s definition of domestic terrorism,” a Justice Department spokesperson said.

    A government official confirmed the plans for the FBI-IRS partnership, adding that the focus will be on exploring potential funding streams at nonprofits that support domestic terrorism or political violence.

    The new “mission control command center” that is probing nonprofits will be based at the FBI, with agents from IRS Criminal Investigations working on one-year temporary assignments, one of the sources added.

    It is not yet clear what groups could be targeted for investigation, though Bondi’s memo instructed all federal law enforcement agencies to scour their files for intelligence on antifa groups and forward it to the FBI.

    The FBI was also ordered to develop a list of groups that are engaged in acts that “may constitute domestic terrorism,” as defined by federal law.

    Such individuals or groups are, according to the law, involved in “acts dangerous to human life” that occur within the U.S. and may be intended to intimidate or coerce people, influence government policy through intimidation or affect the conduct of the government “by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.”

    Although the term is defined in the law, there is no criminal charge on the books for domestic terrorism. Prosecutors typically charge defendants with other crimes and seek terrorism enhancements at sentencing.

    Tom Brzozowski, the former domestic terrorism counsel at the Justice Department’s National Security Division, said the investigative approach laid out by Bondi in her December memo is concerning and raises questions about what predication the FBI has in order to legally justify creating a list of groups that should be targeted for criminal investigation.

    Federal investigators “can look at open source information all they want. They don’t need any kind of particular predication to do that,” he told CBS News. “If you’re going to pull down information and retain it in a government data set, you have to have predication to do that – especially if you’re looking at it through an investigative lens.”

    Bondi issued her memo after President Trump in late September issued an executive order on domestic terrorism that was sparked by a series of high-profile events, including the 2025 assassination of far-right influencer Charlie Kirk.

    In addition to the FBI-IRS joint initiative, the deputy attorney general’s office has also been involved in creating a task force focused on looking into funding into antifa-linked groups, according to a source with direct knowledge of the matter.

    U.S. attorney offices, meanwhile, have also been asked to assign a domestic terrorism coordinator, one of the sources added.

    To date, there have been relatively few public criminal cases involving antifa.

    The most prominent took place in northern Texas, where nine people accused of being part of a so-called antifa cell were convicted earlier this month for their roles in using weapons and explosives, providing material support to terrorists, obstruction, and attempted murder of an Alvarado police officer and correctional officers at the Prairieland ICE Detention Center.

    Antifa, short for “anti-facist,” did not come up on Wednesday when FBI Director Kash Patel testified alongside other senior government intelligence officials before the Senate Intelligence Committee during its annual hearing on worldwide threats, nor was it referenced in the 2026 unclassified annual threat assessment of the intelligence community.

    Patel is slated to appear again for the second of two worldwide threats hearings on Thursday, this time before the House Intelligence Committee.

    During a hearing before the House Homeland Security Committee in December, a senior FBI official testified that antifa represented one of the biggest threats, but struggled to answer questions about the organization, its structure, or why the FBI labeled it as such.

  • 美航空母舰因火灾撤离伊朗战争行动,前往克里特岛维修


    2026-03-18T19:36:46.374Z / CNN

    作者:[海莉·布里茨基]

    23分钟前发布

    发布时间:2026年3月18日,美国东部时间下午3:36

    中东

    [查看所有主题]

    Facebook 推文[邮件]链接 Threads

    链接已复制!

    2026年2月26日,美国海军航空母舰“杰拉尔德·R·福特”号(USS Gerald R. Ford)驶离克里特岛的苏达湾。

    科斯塔斯·梅塔克萨斯/法新社/盖蒂图片社/档案照片

    美国官员表示,在该舰洗衣区上周发生火灾后,美国海军最先进的航空母舰“杰拉尔德·R·福特”号正撤离与伊朗战争相关的行动,前往美国海军在克里特岛的基地进行维修。

    在针对伊朗的军事行动仍全面展开之际,这艘海军最先进的航空母舰开始移动,尤其是美国正寻求减少伊朗对霍尔木兹海峡航运威胁的方法。该航母一直作为美国战斗机参与此次行动的前沿平台。

    美国军方当时表示,3月12日的火灾与战斗无关。两名水手因非致命性伤害接受了治疗,目前情况稳定。

    美国官方称,正在红海航行的“福特”号将在克里特岛的苏达湾“短暂停留进行维修”,此次维修将确定哪些问题可立即修复,哪些可能需要在部署结束返回母港后再处理。福特航母打击群的其他舰艇将留在该地区,不会前往苏达湾与福特号会合。

    美国海军学会新闻网(USNI News)率先报道了“福特”号前往苏达湾维修的消息。

    五角大楼尚未立即回应置评请求。

    美国参谋长联席会议主席丹·凯恩将军周五表示,五角大楼已了解“福特”号上发生火灾一事。

    “我们非常关心在火灾中受伤的舰员,”凯恩在五角大楼新闻发布会上表示,“我们相信并希望所有人都平安无事,对此我们深表感激。”

    “福特”号是美国海军最先进的航空母舰,已部署数月,最初前往加勒比海地区,作为美国军方在与委内瑞拉紧张局势升级期间的区域增兵行动的一部分。2月,总统唐纳德·特朗普宣布派遣该航母打击群前往中东,以加大对伊朗的施压力度。

    该打击群于2月底进入地中海。“亚伯拉罕·林肯”号航母打击群也已部署在该地区。

    美国海军学会新闻网称,如果“福特”号航母持续部署至4月中旬,它可能打破越南战争后航母最长部署时间的纪录。根据美国南方司令部的数据,该航母于2025年6月24日离开母港前往加勒比海部署。

    上周的火灾之前曾有报道称该航母存在持续的管道问题,但海军表示这些问题对航母的日常运作没有影响。

    《纽约时报》本周报道称,灭火工作耗时超过30小时,约600名舰员失去了床位。不过美国官方指出,此次应对火灾的整个过程(包括灭火、清理水损或灭火所用的其他物质,以及确保无复燃风险)共耗时30小时,而非火灾本身持续燃烧了30小时。

    官方还表示,火灾导致略超过100张床铺受损,因为部分睡眠区域与洗衣区相邻。但他们承认,约600名水手因睡眠区域或床铺受到影响而被迫撤离。这种撤离可能是因为其床铺直接受损——部分舰员的床铺为轮班制共用——也可能是整个舱室因烟雾或部分床铺的水损被认定为不适宜居住。

    福特航母打击群由航母及其舰载航空联队,以及阿利·伯克级导弹驱逐舰“马汉”号(USS Mahan)、“班布里奇”号(USS Bainbridge)和“温斯顿·S·丘吉尔”号(USS Winston S. Churchill)组成。

    中东

    [查看所有主题]

    Facebook 推文[邮件]链接 Threads

    链接已复制!

    广告反馈

    US aircraft carrier moves away from Iran war for repairs after fire

    2026-03-18T19:36:46.374Z / CNN

    By [Haley Britzky]

    23 min ago

    PUBLISHED Mar 18, 2026, 3:36 PM ET

    The Middle East

    [See all topics]

    Facebook Tweet[Email]Link Threads

    Link Copied!

    The US Navy aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford departs Souda Bay on the island of Crete on February 26, 2026.

    Costas Metaxakis/AFP/Getty Images/File

    The USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier is moving away from operations tied to the Iran war and sailing to the US Navy’s base in Crete for repairs after a fire broke out in the ship’s laundry area last week, a US official said.

    The movement of the Navy’s most advanced aircraft carrier comes as military operations against Iran are still in full swing, particularly as the US is seeking ways to reduce Iran’s threat to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The carrier has served as a ready platform for American fighter jets to participate in the campaign.

    The fire on March 12 was not combat-related, the US military said at the time. Two sailors received medical treatment for non-life-threatening injuries and were in stable condition.

    Ad Feedback

    The US official said the Ford, which was sailing in the Red Sea, would be at Souda Bay in Crete “for a brief period to conduct repairs,” which would determine what can be fixed immediately and what may need to be fixed when the ship goes back to its home port after its deployment. The other ships within the Ford Carrier Strike Group are remaining where they are in the region and not joining the Ford at Souda Bay.

    USNI News first reported that the Ford was heading to Souda Bay for repairs.

    The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said Friday that the Pentagon was aware of the fire on board the Ford.

    “We’re thinking about the crew there who were injured in the fire,” Caine said during a Pentagon press briefing. “We believe and hope that everyone will be OK and we’re grateful for that.”

    The Ford — the Navy’s most advanced aircraft carrier — has been deployed for months, first [to the Caribbean] as part of the US military’s buildup in the region amid heightened tensions with Venezuela. In February, President Donald Trump said he was sending the carrier strike group to the Middle East in a move to apply more pressure on Iran.

    The strike group entered the Mediterranean Sea in late February. The USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group has also been deployed in the region.

    The Ford could break a record for the longest carrier deployment post-Vietnam if it remains deployed through mid-April, according to USNI News. It left for deployment to the Caribbean on June 24, 2025, according to US Southern Command.

    The fire last week followed reports of consistent plumbing issues aboard the carrier, though the Navy said those issues had no impact on the carrier’s operations.

    The New York Times [reported this week] that it took more than 30 hours to put out the fire, and that 600 crew members lost their beds. The US official said, however, that the entire effort in responding to the fire took 30 hours — putting out the fire, cleaning up water damage or other substances used to put out the fire, and ensuring there were no flare-ups — not that the fire itself burned for 30 hours.

    The official also said that slightly more than 100 beds were damaged in the fire, as some sleeping areas are adjacent to the laundry area. But they acknowledged roughly 600 sailors total were displaced from their sleeping areas or bunks. Displacement could happen because their bed specifically was impacted — beds are sometimes shared by service members who are on opposite shifts — or because the entire space is deemed uninhabitable because of smoke or water damage to some of the beds.

    The Ford strike group consists of the carrier and its carrier air wing, as well as Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyers the USS Mahan, USS Bainbridge, and the USS Winston S. Churchill.

    The Middle East

    [See all topics]

    Facebook Tweet[Email]Link Threads

    Link Copied!

    Ad Feedback

  • 司法部阻止公开爱泼斯坦秘密涉毒调查文件,参议员罗恩·怀登称


    更新于:2026年3月18日 / 美国东部时间下午2:39 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    俄勒冈州民主党参议员罗恩·怀登指控司法部一名高级官员阻止公开一份与杰弗里·爱泼斯坦(Jeffrey Epstein)涉嫌贩毒和卖淫的秘密调查相关的文件。

    怀登表示,司法部副部长托德·布兰奇(Todd Blanche)阻止了司法部有组织犯罪药物执法特别工作组(Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces)于2015年编制的一份未删节备忘录的公开。该机构负责协调政府机构间复杂的毒品和洗钱调查。

    布兰奇在社交媒体帖子中回应称:“一名现任美国参议员为了博眼球完全编造了一个故事。没有人在阻止任何事情。”他补充说,该备忘录“在我们的阅览室”对国会议员“未作删改”,但怀登从未访问过。

    哥伦比亚广播公司新闻在2月份报道称,1月份公布的超过300万份爱泼斯坦相关文件中包含的大量删改备忘录显示,这名被判有罪的性犯罪者是美国缉毒局(Drug Enforcement Agency)调查的对象,该调查至少持续了五年。

    怀登周三在致布兰奇的信中写道,参议院财政委员会的调查人员被告知,美国缉毒局准备应他的要求提供该备忘录的未删节副本——直到布兰奇在过去三周内的某个时候进行了干预。

    “我注意到你正在阻止美国缉毒局提供我要求的关于杰弗里·爱泼斯坦及其几名同伙进行贩毒和洗钱活动的报告的未删节副本,”怀登写道,“你所谓的干预此事的行为令人高度不安。”

    怀登补充说,他认为政府有“充分证据”表明爱泼斯坦参与了贩毒活动,并且“可能向包括未成年女孩在内的受害者注射了致幻药物,以方便实施侵害”。

    1/1 跳过广告 继续观看广告后内容图片1:加载 Pods访问广告商网站前往页面

    经过删改的文件显示,美国缉毒局的调查针对爱泼斯坦和另外14人,因其涉嫌与非法麻醉品有关的可疑资金转账。消息人士告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,内部案件编码表明,美国缉毒局特工针对的是“俱乐部药物”,包括氯胺酮、摇头丸和GHB。文件表明该案件与毒品MDMA(即摇头丸)有关。

    “美国缉毒局的报告表明,上述人员涉及非法电汇,这些电汇与在美国美属维尔京群岛和纽约市发生的非法毒品和/或卖淫活动有关,”2015年的文件中写道。这份69页的备忘录标有“执法敏感”字样,并隐瞒了另外14名目标人物的姓名。

    一名执法部门消息人士告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,该文件似乎源于美国缉毒局向弗吉尼亚州的有组织犯罪药物执法特别工作组融合中心(Fusion Center)提出的请求,要求对案件目标进行全面调查。随后,该融合中心将这些姓名与所有主要联邦执法数据库进行比对,并为特别工作组提供了相关信息。

    一名执法部门消息人士称,美国缉毒局要开启此案,必须存在毒品关联,而融合中心的参与表明该调查“意义重大”。

    本月早些时候,哥伦比亚广播公司新闻向美国缉毒局提交了《信息自由法》请求,以获取与该机构案件相关的更多信息。但该机构拒绝了这一请求,理由包括该备忘录的发布“可能合理地预计会干扰执法程序”等。

    执法部门消息人士表示,该备忘录可能被扣留,因为其中可能包含与案件相关的执法行动,或者可能列出机密线人姓名。

    爱泼斯坦于2019年7月因纽约南区美国检察官办公室的另一项调查被捕并监禁。参与该案件的消息人士告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,检察官当时并不知晓美国缉毒局的早期调查。

    几周后他在狱中死亡,被裁定为自杀。

    Justice Department blocked release of secret Epstein drug probe file, Sen. Ron Wyden says

    Updated on: March 18, 2026 / 2:39 PM EDT / CBS News

    Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon accused a top Justice Department official of blocking the release of a document related to a secret investigation of drug trafficking and prostitution by Jeffrey Epstein.

    Wyden said Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche blocked the release of an unredacted 2015 memorandum prepared by the Justice Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces, an entity charged with coordinating complex drug and money laundering investigations across government agencies.

    Blanche said in a social media post, ” A sitting U.S. Senator has completely fabricated a story for clicks. No one is blocking anything.” He added that the memo is available to members of Congress “unredacted in our reading room,” but Wyden never visited.

    CBS News reported in February that the heavily redacted memo included in the more than 3 million Epstein files released in January shows the convicted sex offender was the subject of a Drug Enforcement Agency probe that stretched at least five years.

    Wyden wrote in his letter to Blanche Wednesday that investigators for the Senate Finance Committee were told the DEA was prepared to comply with his request for an unredacted copy of the memo — until Blanche intervened some time during the last three weeks.

    “It has come to my attention that you are preventing the Drug Enforcement Administration from producing an unredacted copy of a report I requested regarding drug trafficking and money laundering by Jeffrey Epstein and several associates,” Wyden wrote. “Your alleged interference in this matter is highly disturbing.”

    Wyden added he believes the government had “ample evidence” that Epstein was involved in drug trafficking and “likely pumping his victims, including underage girls, with incapacitating drugs to facilitate abuse.”

    1/1 Skip Ad Continue watching after the adImage 1: Loading PodsVisit Advertiser websiteGO TO PAGE

    The redacted document shows the DEA’s investigation targeted Epstein and 14 others for suspicious money transfers possibly linked to illegal narcotics. Sources tell CBS News that internal case coding indicates the DEA agents were targeting “club-drugs,” which included ketamine, ecstasy and GHB. The document indicates the case was related to the drug MDMA, otherwise known as ecstasy.

    “DEA reporting indicates the above individuals are involved in illegitimate wire transfers which are tied to illicit drug and/or prostitution activities occurring in the U.S. Virgin Islands and New York City,” the 2015 document says. The 69-page memo is marked “law enforcement sensitive” and conceals the names of the 14 other targets.

    The document appears to stem from a request by the DEA to an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces Fusion Center in Virginia for a complete workup on case targets, a law enforcement source told CBS News. The fusion center then ran the names against all the major federal law enforcement databases and produced the information for the task force.

    A law enforcement source told CBS News that for the DEA to open the case, there would have to be a drug nexus, and the fusion center’s involvement indicated the investigation was “significant.”

    Earlier this month, CBS News submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the DEA for additional information relating to the agency’s case. That request was denied by the agency citing that the memo’s release “[c]ould reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings,” among other reasons.

    Law enforcement sources said the memo might be withheld because it could contain enforcement actions connected to the case or confidential informant names could be listed.

    Epstein was arrested and jailed in July 2019, after a separate investigation by the U.S Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. Sources involved in that case told CBS News the prosecutors were not aware of the earlier DEA investigation.

    His death in jail weeks later was ruled a suicide.

  • 参议院同事就气质、冒领军功及移民与海关执法局问题审视穆林 在紧张的国土安全部确认听证会上 | 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)政治版


    8分钟阅读

    参议院同事就气质、冒领军功及移民与海关执法局问题审视穆林 在紧张的国土安全部确认听证会上

    作者:[摩根·里默]

    53分钟前发布 2026年3月18日,美国东部时间下午3:06

    国会新闻 联邦机构 唐纳德·特朗普

    [查看所有主题]

    Facebook 推特[电子邮件]链接 Threads

    链接已复制!

    参议员马克韦恩·穆林(Markwayne Mullin),唐纳德·特朗普总统提名的国土安全部部长,周三在国会山的确认听证会后离开。

    埃文·沃奇/路透社

    通常对党内成员友好的听证会环境在周三的国会山变得紧张,参议员们对马克韦恩·穆林进行了约三个小时的严格质询,他正争取成为唐纳德·特朗普总统下任国土安全部负责人。

    共和党国土安全委员会主席兰德·保罗(Rand Paul)对这位俄克拉荷马州共和党议员是否有领导这个拥有超过26万名员工的部门所需的气质表示怀疑,重提了长期存在的争执,穆林曾称他为“毒蛇”。

    该委员会的高级民主党议员加里·彼得斯(Gary Peters)就冒领军功的指控向参议员施压,随后让他为之前称亚历克斯·普雷蒂(Alex Pretti)是“精神失常者”的言论道歉。

    广告反馈

    [相关文章 安娜·莫尼梅克/盖蒂图片社 民主党人喜欢马克韦恩·穆林,但这并不意味着他们会投票支持他担任国土安全部部长 8分钟阅读]

    这对穆林来说是一场尤为激烈的确认听证会,正值特朗普政府的国土安全部面临关键时期——由于议员们扣留资金以讨论可能影响其未来的改革,该部门正处于关闭状态。政府和议员们都希望,这位负责监督移民与海关执法局(ICE)、运输安全管理局和海岸警卫队等关键机构的下一任部门负责人,能够纠正处于公众监督和政治动荡中的员工队伍。

    穆林全程试图强调他领导该部门的方式与即将卸任的部长克里斯蒂·诺姆(Kristi Noem)的不同,誓言承认自己的错误并保持低调。但他是否足以说服议员们支持他还有待观察;委员会预计周四将就是否推进穆林的提名进行投票。

    值得注意的是,保罗在听证会后告诉记者,他将反对穆林的提名。

    “事实上,他无法说我们不应该用暴力解决政治问题,我认为这将给移民与海关执法局和我们的边境巡逻人员树立一个可怕的榜样,”保罗说。

    “我认为我们正处于一场危机中,需要高层更多的指导,而一个喜欢争吵、甚至不能对(2017年袭击事件)表示歉意,反而赞扬袭击发生的人,无法说出‘我很抱歉’的人,在我看来,他怎么能领导移民与海关执法局或边境巡逻队呢?”

    关于“愤怒问题”的指控

    共和党主席质疑穆林的气质是否适合国土安全部负责人,并抨击过去的“毒蛇”言论

    2:12 • 来源:CNN

    共和党主席质疑穆林的气质是否适合国土安全部负责人,并抨击过去的“毒蛇”言论

    2:12

    值得注意的是,保罗对穆林提名的反对可能会危及他的确认,除非民主党参议员约翰·费特曼(John Fetterman)——他已表示将在参议院投票中支持穆林——加入委员会中所有其他共和党成员的行列,以推动穆林的提名通过委员会。

    保罗在激烈的开场陈述中,核心是穆林对他的同事经常成为特朗普的眼中钉,并且多次投票反对共和党优先事项感到不满,这导致参议院投票出现延误和障碍。

    穆林最近告诉一群俄克拉荷马州选民,他“理解”为什么保罗的邻居在2017年袭击了他,并称他为“毒蛇”。

    周三,保罗抨击穆林的言论,认为他拒绝道歉或直接与他对质,这让穆林的性格和领导国土安全部的能力受到质疑。

    “我很震惊你会为这次暴力袭击辩护并表示赞赏,这给我和我的家人带来了巨大的痛苦。我只是想知道,一个为针对政治对手的暴力行为叫好的人,是否是领导一个在合理使用武力方面难以接受限制的机构的合适人选,”肯塔基州参议员保罗对穆林说。

    他说,穆林有机会在听证会上“直视”他并重复那些话。然后,他指责参议员有“愤怒问题”,并指出2023年一次听证会上穆林似乎准备与一名证人发生肢体冲突的事件。

    保罗反复要求穆林为他的言论道歉,但穆林拒绝了。

    相反,穆林辩称两人应该“搁置此事”,继续考虑他的提名。他反复表示自己感到谦卑——曾经是一个有语言障碍的小镇男孩——被考虑担任如此高的联邦职务。

    “房间里的每个人都知道我非常直言不讳,直截了当,如果我有话要说,我会直接当面说出来,”穆林说,指责保罗花更多时间试图“与共和党人对抗,而不是与我们合作”。

    “如果你愿意搁置,我可以放下。让我赢得你的尊重。让我赢得这份工作。我不会让你失望。我不会回避挑战,”他补充道。

    保罗说“播放录音”,回击了一段2023年听证会的视频,以及穆林事后表示他不后悔自己行为的言论。

    穆林在回应委员会时说,证人——国际卡车司机兄弟会主席肖恩·奥布赖恩(Sean O’Brien)——已经成为他的“密友”,并作为他的客人出席听证会。

    在来回交锋之后,费特曼鼓励两人继续前进,并以穆林和奥布赖恩为例。

    “我知道这里有很多个人恩怨,而且绝对我——我认为,政治暴力现在泛滥成灾,这太可怕了,发生的事情,但是,同样,奥布赖恩主席在这里,不是为了第二轮。他来这里是因为他完全支持你的……所以这是关于放下过去,继续前进。”

    费特曼表示他会“持开放态度”,并称赞穆林“一贯的友善和专业”。

    关于冒领军功的指控

    保罗威胁要取消对穆林提名的委员会投票,除非其撤回冒领军功的指控

    2:19 • 来源:CNN

    保罗威胁要取消对穆林提名的委员会投票,除非其撤回冒领军功的指控

    2:19

    没有美国兵役历史的穆林,还被问及他之前关于海外服役和“闻到战争气息”的模糊表述被指控为冒领军功的问题。

    这位共和党参议员将这些指控归咎于“误解”,称大约在2016年,他被要求与一个“非常小的特遣队一起训练并前往某个地区”。他说,在这次旅行中,他参加了生存、逃避、抵抗和逃脱(SERE)训练,他同时将其描述为“有点有趣”和“绝对糟糕”。

    他说,这次训练和旅行的某些方面是机密的。

    “那么,先生,你在哪里闻到了战争的气息?”密歇根州民主党人彼得斯问道。

    穆林回应说,他的回答将是机密的。

    在穆林的整个作证过程中,这一问题被多次提出,彼得斯后来告诉他:“你没有向我或这个委员会坦诚相告。故事似乎总是在演变,有点变化。而且你知道,坦率、诚实、透明在这个时候绝对至关重要,尤其是作为国土安全部部长,需要建立信任。”

    在保罗威胁除非穆林在听证会后向议员们说明他声称完成的机密工作细节,否则将取消委员会周三的投票后,穆林同意在听证会后与议员们在安全场所会面。

    与诺姆的不同

    穆林称称亚历克斯·普雷蒂为“精神失常者”是一个错误

    1:22 • 来源:CNN

    穆林称称亚历克斯·普雷蒂为“精神失常者”是一个错误

    1:22

    穆林强调了他计划领导该部门的方式与诺姆的不同。

    他告诉参议员,他“并不完美”,将“承担”自己的错误并从中学习,这与诺姆不愿承认自己的失误形成对比。“我六个月的目标是,我们不会每天都成为头条新闻,”他说。

    他对新罕布什尔州民主党参议员玛吉·哈桑(Maggie Hassan)说:“每个人都有不同的领导风格。我的管理风格是赋予人们权力,”他向新泽西州参议员安迪·金(Andy Kim)保证,他将对国会议员作出回应,之前议员们多次抱怨,在诺姆领导下,该部门没有及时回复议员的问题。

    “我想我们所有人,无论是众议院还是参议院的人,总是抱怨机构的沟通。我向你保证,我会做到最好。”

    “我们会与你合作。但最重要的是,我认为这个席位上的每个人都有我的私人电话号码。那个电话号码不会改变。如果你打电话给我,你会得到回应。如果你给我发短信,我们会得到回应,”他补充道。

    民主党人就穆林今年早些时候关于普雷蒂与联邦移民官员在明尼苏达州发生致命遭遇的评论向他施压,参议员在枪击事件发生后立即称普雷蒂为“精神失常者”的言论向委员会道歉。

    “我本不该那么说,”他承认。

    “调查正在进行中,而且,就像我说的,有时候会犯错,我承担责任,”他告诉委员会。“这一次,我太快了。我在没有了解事实的情况下立即做出了回应。这是我的错。”

    他还表示,移民与海关执法局在全国各地的部署方式应该有所改变,告诉参议员:“我很希望看到移民与海关执法局更多地成为运输部门,而不是前线力量,”并承诺要求移民与海关执法局官员在进入私人财产前获得司法令状,有限例外情况除外。

    民主党人一直要求在与国土安全部资金的谈判中,将使用司法令状(而非移民与海关执法局目前使用的限制较少的行政令状)作为立法规定。

    总体而言,他关于移民官员应与地方执法机构更密切合作的言论表明,这将恢复移民与海关执法局的传统运作方式,而非像诺姆时期那样进行大规模移民突袭。

    穆林人际关系的焦点

    参议员马克韦恩·穆林在国会山作证时谈到他的儿子,流下眼泪。

    埃文·沃奇/路透社

    穆林的共和党同事们给了他机会讨论他与前众议院议员(包括坐在穆林身后的民主党众议员乔希·戈特海默)的密切关系,以及他与特朗普的友谊。

    穆林称总统为“朋友”,他说与特朗普的交流“更多是作为朋友,而非政策层面”。

    当被问及他对特朗普的忠诚源于何处时,他情绪激动地谈到特朗普在2020年他儿子遭受创伤性脑损伤后给予的帮助,他儿子失去了大部分记忆和肌肉控制能力。

    “我会努力不哭着说完,”穆林说。

    “我们差点失去他。有26个小时他的脉搏极低,有一次他们以为他的脉搏完全停止了,”穆林回忆道。

    他说,特朗普改变了他儿子生命的轨迹,主动提出派他的“私人飞机”送儿子去顶级神经康复中心,并经常跟进他们的情况。

    “从那以后我们一直是朋友,”他说。

    CNN的迈克尔·威廉姆斯、普莉希拉·阿尔瓦雷斯、劳伦·福克斯和摩根·利森对此报道有贡献。

    国会新闻 联邦机构 唐纳德·特朗普

    [查看所有主题]

    Facebook 推特[电子邮件]链接 Threads

    链接已复制!

    广告反馈

    订阅

    登录

    我的账户

    • [设置]
    • [新闻通讯]
    • [关注的主题]
    • [退出]

    您的CNN账户 登录您的CNN账户

    [登录链接]

    *

    [收听][观看]

    *

    • [美国]
    • [犯罪与司法]
    • [移民]
    • [教育]
    • [交通]
    • [种族与身份]
    • [世界]
    • [非洲]
    • [美洲]
    • [亚洲]
    • [澳大利亚]
    • [中国]
    • [欧洲]
    • [印度]
    • [中东]
    • [英国]
    • [政治]
    • [特朗普]
    • [事实优先]
    • [CNN民调]
    • [2026年选举]
    • [重新划分选区追踪]
    • [爱泼斯坦档案]
    • [商业]
    • [科技]
    • [媒体]
    • [计算器]
    • [视频]
    • [市场]
    • [盘前]
    • [盘后]
    • [恐惧与贪婪]
    • [投资]
    • [现在市场]
    • [夜话]
    • [健康]
    • [生活,但更好]
    • [健身]
    • [饮食]
    • [睡眠]
    • [正念]
    • [人际关系]
    • [CNN Underscored]
    • [电子产品]
    • [时尚]
    • [美容]
    • [健康与健身]
    • [家居]
    • [评论]
    • [优惠]
    • [礼物]
    • [旅行]
    • [户外]
    • [宠物]
    • [娱乐]
    • [电影]
    • [电视]
    • [名人]
    • [科技]
    • [创新]
    • [风格]
    • [艺术]
    • [设计]
    • [时尚]
    • [建筑]
    • [奢侈品]
    • [美容]
    • [视频]
    • [旅行]
    • [目的地]
    • [美食与饮品]
    • [住宿]
    • [新闻]
    • [视频]
    • [体育]
    • [职业足球]
    • [大学足球]
    • [篮球]
    • [棒球]
    • [足球]
    • [奥运会]
    • [科学]
    • [太空]
    • [生命]
    • [发掘]
    • [气候]
    • [解决方案]
    • [天气]
    • [天气]
    • [视频]
    • [气候]
    • [乌克兰-俄罗斯战争]
    • [以色列-哈马斯战争]
    • [观看]
    • [精选]
    • [节目与电影]
    • [网络电视]
    • [片段]
    • [CNN头条]
    • [CNN短片]
    • [节目列表]
    • [CNN 10]
    • [CNN电视节目表]
    • [收听]
    • [CNN 5件事]
    • [与桑贾伊·古普塔博士共度人生]
    • [奥黛丽·科尼什专访]
    • [一件事]
    • [拔河]
    • [CNN政治简报]
    • [斧头档案]
    • [与安德森·库珀共度一切]
    • [所有CNN音频播客]
    • [游戏]
    • [每日填字游戏]
    • [字谜填字游戏]
    • [照片洗牌]
    • [Sudoblock]
    • [数独]
    • [5件事测验]
    • [亚马逊Prime日]
    • [关于CNN]
    • [订阅]
    • [照片]
    • [调查]
    • [CNN简介]
    • [CNN领导层]
    • [CNN新闻通讯]
    • [在CNN工作]

    *

    [CNN标志][政治]

    [观看][收听]

    *

    订阅

    登录

    我的账户

    • [设置]
    • [新闻通讯]
    • [关注的主题]
    • [退出]

    您的CNN账户 登录您的CNN账户

    [登录链接]

    关注CNN政治版

    • [在Facebook上关注我们]
    • [在X上关注我们]
    • [在Instagram上关注我们]
    • [在YouTube上关注我们]

    *

    下载CNN应用程序

    [在Google Play下载CNN应用程序的链接]

    [在Apple Store下载CNN应用程序的链接]

    *

    [使用条款][隐私政策][不售卖或分享我的个人信息][广告选择][无障碍与字幕][关于][订阅][新闻通讯][文字记录][帮助中心]

    © 2026年有线电视新闻网。华纳兄弟探索公司旗下。保留所有权利。

    CNN Sans™ & © 2016 有线电视新闻网。

    下载CNN应用程序

    扫描二维码在Google Play下载CNN应用程序。

    下载CNN应用程序

    扫描二维码在Apple Store下载CNN应用程序。

    法律条款与隐私

    点击“同意”,即表示您已阅读并同意《使用条款》,并同意通过Cookie和类似技术收集和使用您的信息,具体见我们的《隐私政策》。

    点击“同意”,即表示您已阅读并同意《使用条款》,并同意通过Cookie和类似技术收集和使用您的信息,具体见我们的《隐私政策》。

    [同意]

    检测到全球隐私控制(GPC)信号。您的个人信息不会被出售或分享。

    不售卖或分享我的个人数据

    仅适用于某些州的居民。请访问我们的[美国州补充说明]了解更多信息。

    [隐私政策]

    管理同意偏好

    允许出售、分享或使用我的个人信息用于定向广告

    • [x] 允许出售、分享或使用我的个人信息用于定向广告

    如果您将此切换到“否”,我们将不会向第三方出售或分享您的个人信息用于针对此设备的广告。

    请访问我们的[隐私中心]了解更多偏好设置。

    严格必要的Cookie

    始终激活

    这些Cookie是网站正常运行所必需的,无法在我们的系统中关闭。您可以设置浏览器阻止或提醒您有关这些Cookie,但网站的某些部分可能无法正常工作。

    Cookie列表

    清除

    • [x] 复选框标签

    应用 取消

    同意合法利益

    • [x] 复选框标签
    • [x] 复选框标签
    • [x] 复选框标签

    确认我的选择

    By

    [Morgan Rimmer]

    53 min ago

    PUBLISHED Mar 18, 2026, 3:06 PM ET

    Congressional news Federal agencies Donald Trump

    [See all topics]

    Facebook Tweet[Email]Link Threads

    Link Copied!

    Sen. Markwayne Mullin, President Donald Trump’s nominee for Homeland Security secretary, departs after his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill, Wednesday.

    Evan Vucci/Reuters

    A typically friendly setting for one of their own turned tense on Capitol Hill Wednesday with senators grilling Markwayne Mullin for roughly three hours as he vies to become President Donald Trump’s next Department of Homeland Security chief.

    Republican Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rand Paul cast doubt on whether the Oklahoma Republican had the temperament to lead the department of more than 260,000 employees, reprising a long-simmering feud in which Mullin called him a “snake.”

    Sen. Gary Peters, the top Democrat on the panel, pressed the senator on allegations of stolen valor and then put him on his heels, pressing for an apology over a previous comment that Alex Pretti was a “deranged individual.”

    Ad Feedback

    [Related article Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images Democrats like Markwayne Mullin but that doesn’t mean they’ll vote for him for DHS secretary 8 min read]

    It all amounted to a particularly heightened confirmation hearing for Mullin at a critical moment for Trump’s Department of Homeland Security, which is shut down as lawmakers withhold funding to debate reforms that could shape its future. The administration – and lawmakers alike – hope the next head of the department, which oversees critical agencies including Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Transportation Security Administration and the Coast Guard, will re-right a workforce under public scrutiny and political turmoil.

    Throughout, Mullin sought to underscore the differences between how he would lead the department and the tenure of outgoing Secretary Kristi Noem, vowing to admit his mistakes and keep a lower profile. But whether he did enough to convince lawmakers to back him remains to be seen; the committee is expected to vote on whether to advance Mullin’s nomination Thursday.

    Notably, Paul told reporters after the hearing that he will oppose Mullin.

    “The fact that he can’t bring himself to say that, you know, really, we shouldn’t settle political questions with violence, I think that would be a terrible example for ICE and for our border patrol agents,” Paul said.

    “We’re in the midst, I think, of a crisis where there needs to be more direction from the top, and a guy who brawls, a guy who can’t even say he’s sorry about, you know, wishing violence on me and really applauding the attack that happened on me, can’t come to say that? I don’t know how he could, from my point of view, be a leader of ICE or border patrol.”

    An accusation of ‘anger issues’

    GOP chairman questions Mullin’s temperament for DHS chief and rails on past “snake” comment

    2:12 • Source: CNN

    GOP chairman questions Mullin’s temperament for DHS chief and rails on past “snake” comment

    2:12

    Notably, Paul’s opposition to Mullin’s nomination could jeopardize his confirmation, unless Democratic Sen. John Fetterman, who has said he will vote to confirm Mullin on the Senate floor, joins all other Republicans on the panel to advance his nomination out of the committee.

    At the crux of Paul’s blistering opening remarks is Mullin’s frustrations that his colleague is often a thorn in Trump’s side and has repeatedly voted against GOP priorities, causing delays and roadblocks on the Senate floor.

    Mullin recently told a group of voters in Oklahoma he “understood” why Paul’s neighbor had attacked him back in 2017 and called him a “snake.”

    Paul on Wednesday railed on Mullin’s comments, arguing that his refusal to apologize or confront him directly put Mullin’s character and ability to lead DHS in doubt.

    “I was shocked that you would justify and celebrate this violent assault that caused me so much pain and my family so much pain. I just wonder if someone who applauds violence against their political opponents is the right person to lead an agency that has struggled to accept limits to the proper use of force,” Paul of Kentucky told Mullin.

    Mullin, he said, would have the opportunity to “look [him] in the eye” and repeat those words during the hearing. Then, accusing the senator of having “ anger issues,” he pointed to an episode during a 2023 hearing in which Mullin appeared prepared to physically fight a witness.

    Repeatedly, Paul pressed Mullin to apologize for his comments, but Mullin refused.

    Instead, Mullin argued the pair should “set it aside,” and move forward with considering his nomination. He repeatedly expressed he was humbled – once a small town kid with a speech impediment – he was being considered for such a high federal office.

    “Everybody in this room knows that I’m very blunt and direct to the point, and if I have something to say, I’ll say it directly to your face,” Mullin said, arguing Paul spends more time trying to “fight Republicans more than you work with us.”

    “I can set it aside, if you’re willing to set it aside. Let me earn your respect. Let me earn the job. I won’t fail you. I won’t back down from a challenge,” he added.

    Saying “roll the tape,” Paul hit back with a clip of the 2023 hearing paired with Mullin’s comments afterward that he didn’t regret his behavior.

    Mullin told the committee in response that the witness – President of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Sean O’Brien – has become a “close friend,” and was attending the hearing as his guest.

    After the back-and-forth, Fetterman encouraged both men to move on, and pointed to Mullin and O’Brien as an example.

    “I know there’s a lot of hard personal feelings here, and absolutely I would, I — It’s terrible, what’s happened and political violence, I mean, it’s, it’s rampant so now. But also, also President O’Brien’s here, not for round two. He’s here because he fully supports your … so it’s about, it’s about letting it go and moving on.”

    Fetterman maintained he’ll have an “open mind,” and praised Mullin’s “consistent kindness and professionalism.”

    Allegations of stolen valor

    Paul threatens to cancel committee vote on Mullin’s nomination over stolen valor allegations

    2:19 • Source: CNN

    Paul threatens to cancel committee vote on Mullin’s nomination over stolen valor allegations

    2:19

    Mullin, who has no history of US military service, was also questioned about accusations that previous, vague statements he has made about serving overseas and smelling war amounted to stolen valor.

    The Republican senator chalked the allegations up to a “misunderstanding,” saying he was asked to train with a “very small contingency and go to a certain area” around 2016. As part of that trip, he said he participated in Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape training, which he simultaneously described as “kind of fun” and “absolutely awful.”

    Aspects of that training and trip were classified, he said.

    “So where did you smell war, sir?” Peters, a Michigan Democrat, asked.

    Mullin responded that his answer would be classified.

    The line of questioning was brought up at different times during Mullin’s appearance, with Peters later telling him: “You’ve not been forthcoming with me or this committee. The story always seems to evolve, to kind of change. And as you know, candor, honesty, transparency are absolutely critical, particularly at this time, to try to build trust as the Secretary of Homeland Security.”

    After Paul threatened to cancel the committee’s Wednesday vote unless Mullin provided them with clarity on the classified work he claimed to have done, Mullin agreed to meet with lawmakers in a secure setting after the hearing.

    A change from Noem

    Mullin says calling Alex Pretti a “deranged individual” was a mistake

    1:22 • Source: CNN

    Mullin says calling Alex Pretti a “deranged individual” was a mistake

    1:22

    Mullin emphasized the differences between how he plans to lead the department and how Noem has done the job.

    He told senators that he’s “not perfect,” and will “own” his mistakes and learn from them, in contrast with Noem’s reluctance to acknowledge her missteps. “My goal in six months is that we’re not in the lead story every single day,” he said.

    He told Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire, “Everybody has different leadership styles. My management style is empowering people,” and he pledged to New Jersey Sen. Andy Kim that he will be responsive to members of Congress, after frequent complaints from members that, under Noem, the department had not answered lawmakers’ questions in a timely manner.

    “I think all of us that’s been either in the House or in the Senate, always complain about the outreach of agencies. I will make a commitment to you that I’m going to have the best,” he said.

    “We’re going to work with you. But most importantly, I think everybody on this dais has my personal cell phone. That cell phone isn’t going to change. And if you, if you call me, you’re going to get a response. If you text me, we’re going to get a response,” he added.

    Democrats challenged Mullin on his past comments about Pretti’s fatal encounter with federal immigration officers in Minnesota earlier this year, and the senator apologized for calling Pretti a “deranged individual” in the immediate aftermath of the shooting.

    “I shouldn’t have said that,” he acknowledged.

    “The investigation is ongoing, and there is, like I said, there’s sometimes going to make mistake and I own it,” he told the panel. “That one, I went out there too fast. I was responding immediately without the facts. That’s my fault.”

    He also said that there should be some changes as to how ICE is deployed around the country, telling senators, “I would love to see ICE become more a transport than on the front line,” and pledged to require ICE officers to obtain judicial warrants before entering private property, with limited exceptions.

    Democrats have demanded that the use of judicial warrants, rather than the less-restrictive administrative warrants ICE has been using, be codified in legislation amid negotiations over funding DHS.

    Overall, his comments about immigration officers working more closely with local law enforcement agencies suggest a return to traditional operations conducted by ICE, instead of broad immigration sweeps as seen under Noem.

    A focus on Mullin’s relationships

    Sen. Markwayne Mullin wipes tears as he speaks about his son during testimony on Capitol Hill Wednesday.

    Evan Vucci/Reuters

    Mullin’s Republican colleagues offered opportunities for the senator to discuss his close relationships with former House members, including Democratic Rep. Josh Gottheimer, who sat behind Mullin at the hearing, and his friendship with Trump.

    Describing the president as a “friend,” Mullin said he speaks with Trump “from a friend level, more than I do a policy level.”

    He grew emotional as he spoke about the president checking in on Mullin’s son after his traumatic brain injury in 2020, when his son lost much of his memory and muscle control.

    “I am going to try to get through it without crying,” Mullin said, responding to a question from Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson about where his loyalty to Trump originated.

    “We almost lost him. For 26 hours he had an extremely low pulse, there was a time that they thought they lose his pulse altogether,” Mullin recalled.

    Trump, he said, changed the trajectory of his son’s life, offering to send his “personal plane” to take him to a top neurorehabilitation center and frequently followed up with them.

    “We’ve been friends ever since,” he said.

    CNN’s Michael Williams, Priscilla Alvarez, Lauren Fox and Morgan Leason contributed to this report.

    Congressional news Federal agencies Donald Trump

    [See all topics]

    Facebook Tweet[Email]Link Threads

    Link Copied!

    Ad Feedback

    Subscribe

    Sign in

    My Account

    • [Settings]
    • [Newsletters]
    • [Topics you follow]
    • [Sign out]

    Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account

    [](https://www.cnn.com/account/log-in)

    *

    [Listen][Watch]

    *

    • [US]
    • [Crime & Justice]
    • [Immigration]
    • [Education]
    • [Transportation]
    • [Race & Identity]
    • [World]
    • [Africa]
    • [Americas]
    • [Asia]
    • [Australia]
    • [China]
    • [Europe]
    • [India]
    • [Middle East]
    • [United Kingdom]
    • [Politics]
    • [Trump]
    • [Facts First]
    • [CNN Polls]
    • [2026 Elections]
    • [Redistricting Tracker]
    • [Epstein Files]
    • [Business]
    • [Tech]
    • [Media]
    • [Calculators]
    • [Videos]
    • [Markets]
    • [Pre-markets]
    • [After-Hours]
    • [Fear & Greed]
    • [Investing]
    • [Markets Now]
    • [Nightcap]
    • [Health]
    • [Life, But Better]
    • [Fitness]
    • [Food]
    • [Sleep]
    • [Mindfulness]
    • [Relationships]
    • [CNN Underscored]
    • [Electronics]
    • [Fashion]
    • [Beauty]
    • [Health & Fitness]
    • [Home]
    • [Reviews]
    • [Deals]
    • [Gifts]
    • [Travel]
    • [Outdoors]
    • [Pets]
    • [Entertainment]
    • [Movies]
    • [Television]
    • [Celebrity]
    • [Tech]
    • [Innovate]
    • [Style]
    • [Arts]
    • [Design]
    • [Fashion]
    • [Architecture]
    • [Luxury]
    • [Beauty]
    • [Video]
    • [Travel]
    • [Destinations]
    • [Food & Drink]
    • [Stay]
    • [News]
    • [Videos]
    • [Sports]
    • [Pro Football]
    • [College Football]
    • [Basketball]
    • [Baseball]
    • [Soccer]
    • [Olympics]
    • [Science]
    • [Space]
    • [Life]
    • [Unearthed]
    • [Climate]
    • [Solutions]
    • [Weather]
    • [Weather]
    • [Video]
    • [Climate]
    • [Ukraine-Russia War]
    • [Israel-Hamas War]
    • [Watch]
    • [Featured]
    • [Shows & Films]
    • [Network TV]
    • [Clips]
    • [CNN Headlines]
    • [CNN Shorts]
    • [Shows A-Z]
    • [CNN 10]
    • [CNN TV Schedules]
    • [Listen]
    • [CNN 5 Things]
    • [Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta]
    • [The Assignment with Audie Cornish]
    • [One Thing]
    • [Tug of War]
    • [CNN Political Briefing]
    • [The Axe Files]
    • [All There Is with Anderson Cooper]
    • [All CNN Audio podcasts]
    • [Games]
    • [Daily Crossword]
    • [Jumble Crossword]
    • [Photo Shuffle]
    • [Sudoblock]
    • [Sudoku]
    • [5 Things Quiz]
    • [Amazon Prime Day]
    • [About CNN]
    • [Subscribe]
    • [Photos]
    • [Investigations]
    • [CNN Profiles]
    • [CNN Leadership]
    • [CNN Newsletters]
    • [Work for CNN]

    *

    [](https://www.cnn.com/ “CNN logo”)[Politics]

    [Watch][Listen]

    *

    Subscribe

    Sign in

    My Account

    • [Settings]
    • [Newsletters]
    • [Topics you follow]
    • [Sign out]

    Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account

    [](https://www.cnn.com/account/log-in)

    Follow CNN Politics

    • [](https://facebook.com/cnnpolitics “Visit us on Facebook”)
    • [](https://twitter.com/cnnpolitics “Visit us on X”)
    • [](https://instagram.com/cnnpolitics “Visit us on Instagram”)
    • [](https://youtube.com/user/CNN “Visit us on YouTube”)

    *

    Download the CNN app

    [](https://cnn.onelink.me/PVpf/q9j1odhf)[](https://cnn.onelink.me/PVpf/43qg6lsp)

    Download the CNN app

    [](https://cnn.onelink.me/PVpf/q9j1odhf)[](https://cnn.onelink.me/PVpf/43qg6lsp)

    *

    [Terms of Use][Privacy Policy][Do Not Sell Or Share My Personal Information][Ad Choices][Accessibility & CC][About][Subscribe][Newsletters][Transcripts][Help Center]
    © 2026 Cable News Network. A Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All Rights Reserved.

    CNN Sans ™ & © 2016 Cable News Network.

    Download the CNN app

    Scan the QR code to download the CNN app on Google Play.

    Download the CNN app

    Scan the QR code to download the CNN app from the Apple Store.

    Legal Terms and Privacy

    By clicking Agree, you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and agree to the collection and use of your information by cookies and similar technologies, as set forth in our Privacy Policy.
    By clicking “Agree”, you have read and agree to the [Terms of Use] and agree to the collection and use of your information by cookies and similar technologies, as set forth in our [Privacy Policy].

    [Agree]

    Global Privacy Control (GPC) signal detected. Your personal information will not be sold or shared.

    Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Data

    For residents of certain states only. Please visit our [U.S. State Supplement] for more information.

    [Privacy Policy]

    Manage Consent Preferences

    Allow the Sale, Sharing or use of My Personal information for Targeted Advertising

    • [x] Allow the Sale, Sharing or use of My Personal information for Targeted Advertising

    If you switch this toggle to “no,” we will not sell or share your personal information with third parties for advertising targeted to this device.

    Please see our [Privacy Center] for additional preferences.

    Strictly Necessary Cookies

    Always Active

    These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work.

    Cookie List

    Clear

    • – [x] checkbox label label

    Apply Cancel

    Consent Leg.Interest

    • [x] checkbox label label
    • [x] checkbox label label
    • [x] checkbox label label

    Confirm My Choices

  • 进步派网红在伊利诺伊州初选失利后爆发,发表亵渎性反特朗普、反移民局言论


    Kat Abughazaleh 在伊利诺伊州民主党初选中获得约26%的选票,输给了埃文斯顿市长Daniel Biss

    作者:Alexandra Koch、Patrick McGovern,福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年3月18日 美国东部时间下午1:47

    周二晚在伊利诺伊州第9国会选区民主党初选中失利后,进步派网红Kat Abughazaleh在其败选演讲结束时说出”操特朗普,操移民局,巴勒斯坦自由”的脏话。(图片来源:WFLD)

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

    收听本文
    2分钟

    进步派网红Kat Abughazaleh在周二晚结束其失败的伊利诺伊州国会竞选活动时,发表了带有脏话的长篇抨击,矛头直指总统唐纳德·特朗普和联邦移民管理机构,她告诉支持者:”操特朗普,操移民局,巴勒斯坦自由。”

    这些言论是在周二输掉伊利诺伊州第9国会选区民主党初选后的败选演讲结尾发表的。

    “我不知道你们有没有听到,但我们没有赢,这真的太操蛋了。我们离成功很近了,”Abughazaleh对人群说,并补充说她的竞选活动”是任何掌权者都从未预料到会成为可能的事情”。

    Abughazaleh输给了现任埃文斯顿市长Daniel Biss。

    民主党国会候选人Kat Abughazaleh于2025年9月26日在伊利诺伊州布鲁德维尤的移民局设施外手持扩音器抗议。(Jim Vondruska/路透社)

    伊利诺伊州副州长寻求美国参议院席位,发布民众高呼’操特朗普’的视频

    据美联社报道,Abughazaleh获得约26%的选票,而Biss获得近30%的支持率。

    “Abughazaleh说:”全国有许多进步人士都在像我们一样冒险,我们必须帮助他们获胜。”无论有多困难,我们都向本届政府和任何支持它的人发出了一个信息。…你们和你们的工作都不安全。这只是开始,而不是结束。”

    身为巴勒斯坦裔美国人的Abughazaleh接着声称,本届政府正在”绑架和杀害”公民,并”发动非法战争”。

    民主党国会候选人Kat Abughazaleh于9月在布鲁德维尤移民局设施外抗议。(路透社/Jim Vondruska)

    众议院民主党人抨击特朗普政府顶级移民官员,称其’最好祈祷总统赦免’

    “Abughazaleh说:”当我说我会用我余生的每一个清醒时刻来追究本届政府的责任,无论输赢,我他妈的是认真的。”我很抱歉这让人失望。但是,操特朗普,操移民局,巴勒斯坦自由,我爱你们所有人。”

    Biss将在11月的大选中对阵共和党牧师John Elleson,以接替退休近30年的民主党众议员Jan Schakowsky。

    Abughazaleh仍面临联邦指控,她去年秋天被指控在伊利诺伊州布鲁德维尤移民局处理中心外干扰移民局行动。

    Kat Abughazaleh在周二晚结束其失败的伊利诺伊州国会竞选活动时,对特朗普政府发表了带有脏话的长篇抨击。(Jon Stegenga via Storyful和WBBM)

    ” Squad”成员在特朗普演讲期间于众议院佩戴”操移民局”别针

    联邦检察官指控Abughazaleh和其他一群人在一名移民局特工的车辆上刻下了”猪”这个词。

    她否认有罪,并批评这些指控是”特朗普政府试图将抗议活动犯罪化并惩罚敢于发声者的企图”。

    这位网红在一段视频显示一名特工将她推倒在地后也迅速走红,这段视频后来被她用于国会竞选广告。

    Abughazaleh的办公室没有立即回应福克斯新闻数字版的置评请求。

    Alexandra Koch是福克斯新闻数字版记者,报道突发新闻,关注塑造全国讨论的重大影响事件。

    她报道过重大全国性危机,包括洛杉矶野火、波托马克河和哈德逊河航空灾难、博尔德恐怖袭击以及德克萨斯州丘陵地区洪水。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6391134397112

    Progressive influencer erupts after Illinois primary loss, drops profane anti-Trump, -ICE rant

    Kat Abughazaleh received about 26% of the vote in Illinois Democratic primary, losing to Evanston mayor Daniel Biss

    By Alexandra Koch, Patrick McGovern, Fox News

    Published March 18, 2026 1:47pm EDT

    After losing the Illinois 9th Congressional District Democratic primary Tuesday night, Progressive influencer Kat Abughazaleh ended her concession speech with “F— Trump, f— ICE, free Palestine.” (Credit: WFLD)

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    2 min

    Progressive influencer Kat Abughazaleh closed out her failed Illinois congressional bid Tuesday night with an expletive-laced tirade against President Donald Trump and federal immigration authorities, telling supporters, “f— Trump, f— ICE, free Palestine.”

    The comments came at the end of her concession speech after losing the Illinois 9th Congressional District Democratic primary on Tuesday.

    “I don’t know if you heard, but we didn’t win, and it really f—— sucks. We came really close,” Abughazaleh told the crowd, adding that her campaign was “something that no one in power even expected would be possible at all.”

    Abughazaleh lost the primary to Daniel Biss, the current mayor of Evanston.

    Democratic congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh holds a megaphone outside the Broadview ICE Facility, Sept. 26, 2025, in Broadview, Ill.(Jim Vondruska/Reuters)

    ILLINOIS LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR SEEKING US SENATE SEAT RELEASES VIDEO OF PEOPLE SAYING ‘F— TRUMP’

    Abughazaleh received about 26% of the vote, compared to Biss’s nearly 30% support, according to a report from The Associated Press.

    “There are progressives all over the country who are taking a chance just like we did, and we have to help them win,” Abughazaleh said. “No matter how hard it is, we have sent a message to this administration and anyone who enables it. … You and your jobs are not safe. This is the start and not the end.”

    Abughazaleh, a Palestinian American, went on to claim the administration was “kidnap[ping] and kill[ing]” citizens, and “start[ing] illegal wars.”

    Democratic congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh protests outside the Broadview ICE Facility in September.(Reuters/Jim Vondruska)

    HOUSE DEM EXPLODES ON TOP TRUMP IMMIGRATION OFFICIAL, SAYS HE ‘BETTER HOPE’ FOR PARDON FROM PRESIDENT

    “When I said, when I said I would spend every single waking moment of the rest of my life to hold this administration accountable, win or lose, I f—— meant it,” Abughazaleh said. “I’m sorry that this sucks. But, f— Trump, f— ICE, free Palestine, I love you all.”

    Biss will face Republican pastor John Elleson in November’s general election to replace Rep. Jan Schakowsky, a Democrat who is retiring after nearly 30 years in office.

    Abughazaleh is still facing federal charges after she was accused of interfering with ICE operations outside the Broadview, Illinois ICE processing center last fall.

    Kat Abughazaleh closed out her failed Illinois congressional bid Tuesday night with an expletive-laced tirade against the Trump administration.(Jon Stegenga via Storyful and WBBM)

    ‘SQUAD’ MEMBER WEARS ‘F— ICE’ PIN ON HOUSE FLOOR DURING TRUMP ADDRESS

    Federal prosecutors allege Abughazaleh and a group of others scratched the word “PIG” on an ICE agent’s vehicle.

    She pleaded not guilty and criticized the charges as an “attempt by the Trump administration to criminalize protest and punish those who dare to speak up.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The influencer also went viral after video showed an agent throwing her to the ground during the incident, footage she later used in her campaign ads for Congress.

    Abughazaleh’s office did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

    Alexandra Koch is a Fox News Digital journalist who covers breaking news, with a focus on high-impact events that shape national conversation.

    She has covered major national crises, including the L.A. wildfires, Potomac and Hudson River aviation disasters, Boulder terror attack, and Texas Hill Country floods.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6391134397112

  • 关于乔·肯特的情况:特朗普的反恐负责人因伊朗战争问题辞职


    2026年3月18日 / 美国东部时间下午3:48 / 哥伦比亚广播公司/美联社

    周二,国家反恐中心主任乔·肯特(Joe Kent)辞职。他一直是特朗普坚定的支持者,自2016年特朗普竞选总统以来就一直支持他,经历了2020年选举失利、1月6日骚乱,以及他自己在保守派媒体的宣传和两次国会竞选失败。

    但这一切随着特朗普对伊朗发动战争以及他与以色列结盟对抗领导德黑兰政府的伊斯兰神职人员而结束。肯特周二在X平台(原推特)发布的辞职信中表示,伊朗”对我国没有迫在眉睫的威胁”,并断言”我们发动这场战争是由于以色列及其强大的美国游说团体的压力”。

    45岁的肯特是一名特种部队战斗老兵,与右翼极端分子有联系,被视为特朗普的忠实拥护者。他辞职的理由与总统声称伊朗正准备袭击美国的说法相矛盾。

    2月28日,在宣布首次空袭的视频中,特朗普总统称他的目标是”消除伊朗政权的迫在眉睫的威胁”。

    “其威胁性活动直接危及美国、我们的军队、海外基地以及全球盟友,”特朗普谈及伊朗时说道。

    肯特在致特朗普的辞职信中暗示总统被误导,称”以色列高级官员和有影响力的美国媒体成员展开了一场虚假信息运动…以煽动与伊朗的战争”。肯塔基州共和党参议员米奇·麦康奈尔在X平台上抨击其辞职信中的”恶毒反犹主义”,并表示很明显肯特无法履行他对参议员们”以正直和问责领导”的承诺。

    一位政府官员告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,肯特未参与关于伊朗的简报工作。

    国家情报总监图尔西·加巴德(Tulsi Gabbard)的办公室监督肯特的工作,她表示是否认为伊朗对美国构成威胁是特朗普的决定。

    “在仔细审查了所有信息后,特朗普总统得出结论,伊朗的恐怖主义伊斯兰政权构成了迫在眉睫的威胁,他据此采取了行动,”她周二在社交媒体上写道。

    与右翼人物、阴谋论的关联

    在参议院确认听证会上,肯特承认,在他两次失败的国会竞选之一期间,一名政治顾问安排了一次通话,右翼白人民族主义者尼克·富恩特斯(Nick Fuentes)也参与其中。富恩特斯曾称犹太人正”劫持”美国,还曾宣称”希特勒很棒;希特勒是对的”。

    2022年竞选众议院席位时,肯特聘请了极右翼军事组织”骄傲男孩”成员格雷厄姆·约根森(Graham Jorgensen)提供咨询服务。他还与基督教民族主义组织”爱国者祈祷”创始人乔伊·吉布森(Joey Gibson)密切合作,并获得了众多极右翼人士的支持。

    肯特还支持了一些阴谋论并提出了多项有争议的主张。他声称新冠疫苗不是疫苗,而是”实验性基因疗法”,还称美国国家过敏和传染病研究所前所长安东尼·福奇(Anthony Fauci)应该面临谋杀指控。肯特还表示他认为2020年选举被特朗普窃取,并将2021年1月6日的骚乱者称为”政治犯”。

    他附和了一种阴谋论,即联邦探员不知通过何种方式煽动了2021年1月6日的国会山袭击事件。他称拜登应该被弹劾,并呼吁调查2020年选举。在联邦调查局搜查总统海湖庄园的机密文件后,肯特呼吁削减联邦调查局经费。

    肯特后来否认了一些右翼联系,并表示他拒绝一切”种族主义和偏见”。在参议院听证会上,他拒绝与自己2020年的选举否认主义划清界限。

    他在7月以52-44的参议院投票结果获得确认,投票结果严格按党派划分。所有民主党人都反对他的提名,理由是他与右翼的联系。北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯(Thom Tillis)是唯一反对肯特确认的共和党人。

    作为国家反恐中心主任,肯特领导着一个9/11袭击后成立的情报机构,负责分析和探测恐怖主义威胁。该机构还维护着美国政府已知和疑似恐怖分子名单等多项任务。

    肯特的军事背景

    在确认之前,肯特曾担任加巴德的首席幕僚长。他是一名退役绿色贝雷帽队员,在陆军20年职业生涯中执行了11次战斗任务,主要在伊拉克。

    2018年退役后,他成为中情局的准军事军官,并担任特朗普2020年总统连任竞选的反恐顾问。在2022年和2024年国会竞选前后,他经常出现在保守派有线电视节目和播客中。

    肯特的第一任妻子香农·肯特(Shannon Kent)是一名海军密码学家,2019年在叙利亚打击”伊斯兰国”组织时被自杀式炸弹手杀害。她精通七种语言,为特种作战部队增加女性人数铺平了道路。根据海军的说法,她在伊拉克执行了多次任务,参与了多次特种作战,抓获了数百名敌方叛乱分子。

    妻子去世后,肯特公开反对美国在全球的干预。”这就是我对我们联邦政府持怀疑态度的原因,”他表示,并补充说香农的死是因为”共和党人和民主党人一贯向美国人民撒谎,以让我们继续参与海外战争”。

    在2021年美国从阿富汗混乱撤军期间,肯特抨击了国防工业和华盛顿的”永久统治阶级”。他暗示一些支持海外国家建设的人很天真,而另一些人则受利润动机驱使。

    “这反映了我们的傲慢,”肯特在竞选国会时告诉记者,”我们没有从这一切中吸取教训,这表明有些人在另一端赚钱和发展自己的事业。他们是在我们士兵的背后和尸体上这样做的。”

    特朗普在2025年2月提名肯特时称赞道:”肯特将通过消灭世界各地的圣战分子以及我们后院的贩毒集团,帮助我们保障美国安全。”

    参议院确认听证会上,肯特聚焦拉美贩毒集团而非中东

    但在参议院确认听证会上,肯特将重点放在了拉美贩毒集团而非中东问题上。

    “特朗普总统致力于识别这些贩毒集团和暴力帮派成员,并确保我们找到他们并将其驱逐出美国,”肯特告诉参议院情报委员会。

    他的提名面临一些审查,此前有电子邮件显示,在担任加巴德首席幕僚长期间,他曾施压高级情报分析师修改一份关于委内瑞拉政府与犯罪团伙”特伦德阿拉瓜”(Tren de Aragua)之间联系的评估报告。在电子邮件中,肯特要求分析师让评估报告更紧密地与特朗普政府政策保持一致,并加入批评拜登政府移民计划的内容。肯特的修改支持了特朗普的说法,即特伦德阿拉瓜成员可根据战时《敌国人民法》被驱逐。

    关于打击胡塞武装的信号聊天

    在确认听证会上,民主党参议员质问肯特是否参与了特朗普国家安全团队使用的Signal通讯群组,该群组用于讨论敏感军事计划。

    这个Signal聊天群组意外包括了《大西洋月刊》(The Atlantic)的主编,其中显示国防部长彼得·赫格斯(Pete Hegseth)提供了2025年3月针对也门胡塞武装的战机发射和空袭时间等信息。这些通常属于机密的信息在执行这些攻击任务的官兵起飞前就被披露了。

    这成为政府的一个尴尬爆发点,尽管特朗普政府的高级官员否认泄露了机密信息,赫格斯、肯特等人也未受到总统的任何处分。

    What to know about Joe Kent, Trump counterterrorism chief who resigned over Iran war

    March 18, 2026 / 3:48 PM EDT / CBS/AP

    Joe Kent, who resigned Tuesday as National Counterterrorism Center director, has been a stalwart Trump supporter, backing him since his 2016 campaign, through his 2020 election defeat, the Jan. 6 riots, as well as during his own conservative media advocacy and two failed congressional bids.

    But that ended with Mr. Trump’s war in Iran and his alliance with Israel against the Islamic clerics who led the Tehran government. In a resignation letter he posted on X,Kent saidTuesday that Iran “posed no imminent threat to our nation,” and he asserted that “we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.”

    Kent, 45, is a special forces combat veteran with ties to right-wing extremists and was viewed as a Trump loyalist. His reasons for resigning contradicted the president’s assertion that Iran was poised to attack the U.S.

    On Feb. 28, in a video announcing the first airstrikes, Mr. Trump said his objective was “eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime.”

    “Its menacing activities directly endanger the United States, our troops, our bases overseas, and our allies throughout the world,” Mr. Trump said of Iran.

    Kent, in his resignation letter to Mr. Trump suggested the president had been misled and that “high-ranking Israeli officials and influential members of the American media deployed a misinformation campaign … to encourage a war with Iran.” GOP Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky in a post on Xattacked the “virulent anti-Semitism of his resignation letter” and said it was clear Kent was incapable of upholding a pledge he’d made to senators “to lead with integrity and accountability.”

    An administration official told CBS News that Kent was not involved on briefings on Iran.

    Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, whose office oversaw Kent’s work, said it was up to Mr. Trump to decide whether Iran posed a threat to the U.S.

    “After carefully reviewing all the information before him, President Trump concluded that the terrorist Islamist regime in Iran posed an imminent threat and he took action based on that conclusion,” she wrote in a social media post Tuesday.

    Association with far-right figures, conspiracy theories

    In his Senate confirmation hearings, Kent acknowledged that during one of his two failed congressional campaigns, a political consultant set up a call joined by right-wing white nationalist Nick Fuentes. Fuentes has said that Jews are holding the U.S. “hostage” and once proclaimed that “Hitler was awesome; Hitler was right.”

    When he ran for a House seat in 2022, Kent paid Graham Jorgensen, a member of the far-right military group the Proud Boys, for consulting work. He also worked closely with Joey Gibson, the founder of the Christian nationalist group Patriot Prayer, and attracted support from a variety of far-right figures.

    Kent has also endorsed a number of conspiracy theories and made a number of controversial claims. He’sclaimedthe COVID vaccine wasn’t a vaccine, but rather, “an experimental gene therapy” and has also said Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, should facemurdercharges. Kent also said he believes the 2020 election was stolen from Mr. Trump and has referred to the Jan. 6, 2021, rioters as “political prisoners.”

    He echoed a conspiracy theory that federal agents had somehow instigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack at the Capitol. He said Biden should be impeached and called for an investigation into the 2020 election. Kent called for the defunding of the FBI after its search at the president’s Mar-a-Lago home for classified documents.

    Kent later disavowed some of his right-wing ties and said he rejected all “racism and bigotry.” During his Senate hearings, he declined to distance himself from his 2020 election denialism.

    He was confirmed in July on a 52-44 Senate vote that fell closely along party lines. Every Democrat opposed his nomination, citing his right-wing ties. GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina was the only Republican to oppose Kent’s confirmation.

    As the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Kent led an intelligence agency that was created after the 9/11 attacks to analyze and detect terrorist threats. Among other tasks, the agency maintains the U.S. government’s list of known and suspected terrorists.

    Kent’s military background

    Before his confirmation, Kent worked as Gabbard’s chief of staff. He’s a retired Green Beret who deployed to 11 combat missions, mostly in Iraq, during a 20-year career in the Army.

    After his retirement in 2018, he became a paramilitary officer with the CIA and served as a counterterrorism adviser to Trump’s 2020 presidential reelection campaign. He was a regular on conservative cable shows and podcasts before and during his 2022 and 2024 congressional bids.

    Kent’s first wife, Shannon Kent, was a Navy cryptologist killed by a suicide bomber in 2019 while fighting the Islamic State group in Syria. She was fluent in seven languages and paved the way for the increased inclusion of women in Special Operations Forces. She served multiple tours in Iraq and participated in a number of special operations that resulted in the capture of hundreds of enemy insurgents, according to the Navy.

    After his wife’s death, Kent spoke out against U.S. intervention around the world. “That is why I have a skepticism of our federal government,” he said, adding that Shannon had died because “Republicans and Democrats consistently lied to the American people to keep us engaged in wars abroad.”

    During the U.S.’s chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, Kent lambasted the defense industry and “permanent ruling class” in Washington. He suggested some proponents of foreign nation building were naïve and others were driven by profit motives.

    “It speaks to our hubris,” Kent told reporters while campaigning for Congress. “For us not to have learned from all this just shows that there are people making money and making their careers at the other end of it. They’ve been doing it on the backs and dead bodies of U.S. soldiers.”

    Mr. Trump praised Kent when he nominated him in February 2025, saying in a social media post that Kent “will help us keep America safe by eradicating all terrorism, from the jihadists around the World, to the cartels in our backyard.”

    In Senate confirmation hearings, Kent focused on cartels, rather than Middle East

    But at his Senate confirmation hearings, Kent focused heavily on Latin American drug cartels, rather than the Middle East.

    “President Trump is committed to identifying these cartels and these violent gang members and making sure that we locate them and that we get them out of our country,” Kent told the Senate Intelligence Committee.

    His nominationfaced some scrutinywhen emails emerged showing that while he was Gabbard’s chief of staff, he had pressed senior intelligence analysts to amend an assessment of links between the Venezuelan government and the criminal gang,Tren de Aragua. In the emails, Kent pressed the analysts to align the assessment more closely with Trump administration policies and to include references that criticized Biden-era immigration programs. Kent’s revisions supported Mr. Trump’s assertions that Tren de Aragua members could be removed under the wartime Alien Enemies Act.

    Signal chat about strikes on Houthis

    During his confirmation hearing, Democratic senators grilled Kent about his participation in a group chat on Signal used by Mr. Trump’s national security team to discuss sensitive military plans.

    The Signal chat, which inadvertently included the editor in chief of The Atlantic magazine, showed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth provided information about the timing of warplane launches and airstrikes against Houthis in Yemen in March 2025. The disclosure of typically classified information came before the men and women flying those attacks were airborne.

    It became an embarrassing flashpoint for the administration, though top Trump administration officials denied classified information was divulged and Hegseth, Kent and others faced no consequences from the president.

  • 肯塔基州共和党参议员兰德·保罗在周三的国土安全部确认听证会上,就俄克拉荷马州共和党参议员马克韦恩·穆林对其进行人身攻击的历史对其进行了严厉质问


    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

    Listen to this article

    4 分钟

    周三上午,参议院国土安全和政府事务委员会主席、肯塔基州共和党参议员兰德·保罗在审议俄克拉荷马州共和党参议员马克韦恩·穆林被提名接替克里斯蒂·诺姆担任国土安全部部长的听证会上,毫不留情地展开了开场白。

    保罗指控穆林为政治暴力开脱,并要求他重复过去称自己为“毒蛇”以及表示理解保罗为何在2017年遭到邻居暴力袭击的言论。

    “你从来没有勇气直视我的眼睛,告诉我那次袭击是合理的,”保罗在开场陈述中对委员会表示。“所以今天你将有机会。今天我会给你一个澄清记录的机会。

    “如果那是你所相信的,就当面告诉我。今天就告诉我。告诉全世界你为什么认为我活该从背后遭到袭击,六根肋骨断裂和肺部受损。

    “当面告诉我你为什么认为我罪有应得。”

    穆林在准备好的陈述前即兴回应了保罗的言语攻击。

    “我必须回应主席称我为骗子的言论,”穆林开口道。“房间里的每个人都知道我非常直言不讳,直奔主题。如果我有什么要说的,我会直接当面告诉你。”

    穆林将保罗的言论引回到两人作为众议院共和党成员时的一次私下谈话。

    “我说过,考虑到你当时的行为,我能理解为什么你的邻居……会那么做,”穆林说。“至于我用的‘草丛中的毒蛇’这个说法,先生,我在这个房间里努力解决问题。我和这个房间里的许多人都合作过。

    “看来你和共和党人作对的时候比和我们合作的时候多。我确实回应了那些言论。”

    穆林向保罗保证会直言不讳。

    “如果我有什么要说的,房间里的每个人都知道我会如何直接面对你,”他说。“我会公开说,也会私下说,但我绝不会在背后说你的坏话。”

    穆林承认与保罗“相处不融洽”,并表示保罗“花了数百万美元在针对我的竞选活动中”。

    “这丝毫不会阻止我履行职责,”穆林继续说道。“我可以和房间里的每个人都有不同的意见,但作为国土安全部部长,我会保护每个人,包括肯塔基州,就像保护我俄克拉荷马州的后院一样。

    “这比我们之间的党派争吵更重要。这比我们的政治分歧更重要。”

    “事实是,我有工作要做,我根本不喜欢在任何事情上失败。所以如果你愿意放下这些,我可以把它放在一边。让我赢得你的尊重。我会争取得到这个职位。我不会让你失望。我不会退缩于挑战。我也会在错的时候承认。我并不完美。我不声称自己完美。我和其他人一样会犯错。但错误,如果由你自己承担,你可以从中学习并继续前进。而我会向你承诺这一点。”

    保罗似乎没有兴趣搁置这场争执。

    “记录应该表明,我认为你缺乏悔意:没有道歉,也没有对支持我的言论表示遗憾,”保罗在第一轮质询中表示。“你完全清楚我所遭受的暴力。你毫无悔意。你所争论的唯一一点是我在众议院时是否见过你。

    “我不认为我们在众议院时见过,而你唯一不满的是我当面称你为骗子。所以这实际上更多是关于你所谓的‘男子气概’。”

    有三位消息人士告诉福克斯新闻的比尔·梅卢金,保罗阻止阿拉巴马州共和党参议员凯蒂·布里特在听证会开始时介绍穆林,迫使俄克拉荷马州共和党参议员詹姆斯·兰克福德取而代之,因此受到了一些批评。

    “兰德·保罗完全被他对特朗普总统的仇恨和琐碎的个人争吵蒙蔽了双眼,”一位资深参议院共和党消息人士告诉梅卢金。“他今天的行为就像一条愤怒的毒蛇——一个无可救药的伪君子。

    “什么样的言论自由倡导者会禁止穆林议员选择发表介绍?”这位消息人士问道。“什么样的共和党人会禁止共和党参议员表达对同事的支持?为什么这个人还能继续执掌共和党权力?”

    埃里克·麦克是福克斯新闻数字版的记者,负责报道突发新闻。

    Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., grilled Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., on his history of personal attacks against Paul during his opening statement at Wednesday’s Homeland Security confirmation hearing.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    4 min

    Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., pulled no punches in his opening statement Wednesday morning at the Department of Homeland Security Committee hearing on fellow GOP Sen. Markwayne Mullin’s nomination to be Kristi Noem’s successor as secretary.

    Paul, chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, accused Mullin of excusing political violence and challenging him to repeat past remarks of having called him a “snake” and saying he understood why Paul was attacked violently by a neighbor in 2017.

    “You have never had the courage to look me in the eye and tell me that the assault was justified,” Paul told the committee in his opening remarks. “So today you’ll have your chance. Today I’ll give you that chance to clear the record.

    “Tell it to my face if that’s what you believe. Tell it to me today. Tell the world why you believe I deserve to be assaulted from behind, have six ribs broken and a damaged lung.

    “Tell me to my face why you think I deserved it.”

    Mullin opened his own remarks off the cuff before his prepared statement to address Paul’s verbal attack.

    “I have to address the remarks the chairman made, calling me a liar,” Mullin opened. “Everybody in this room knows that I’m very blunt and direct to the point. And if I have something to say, I’ll say it directly to your face.”

    Mullin pointed Paul back to a private conversation back in their days as House GOP members.

    “I said I could understand because of the behavior you were having, that I could understand why your neighbor…did what he did,” Mullin said. “As far as my terms, the snake in the grass, sir, I work around this room to try to fix problems. I’ve worked with many people in this room.

    “It seems like you fight Republicans more than you work with us. I did address those remarks.”

    Mullin vowed to Paul to be blunt and direct.

    “If I do have something to say, everybody in this room knows how I’ll come straight to you,” he said. “I’ll say it publicly and I’ll say it privately, but I’ll never say it behind your back.”

    Mullin acknowledged about Paul, “We just don’t get along,” and saying Paul has “spent millions of dollars in my campaigns against me.”

    “That doesn’t keep me at all from doing my job,” Mullin continued. “I can have different opinions with everybody in this room, but as secretary of homeland, I’ll be protecting everybody, including Kentucky, as much as I will my own backyard in Oklahoma.

    “It’s bigger than the partisan bickering that we have. It’s bigger than the political differences we have.”

    “The truth is, I have a job to do, and I don’t like to fail at anything at all. So I can set it aside, if you’re willing to set it aside. Let me earn your respect. I’m going to earn the job. I won’t fail you. I won’t back down from a challenge. And I’ll also admit when I’m wrong. I’m not perfect. I don’t claim to be perfect. I make mistakes just like anybody else. But mistakes, if you own them, you can learn from them and you can move ahead. And I’ll make that commitment to you _.”

    Paul showed no interest in setting the feud aside.

    “The record should show, and I think we’ll show a lack of contrition: No apology and no regrets for your support,” Paul picked up in his first line of questioning. “You completely understand the violence that was perpetrated on me. You’re unrepentant. The only thing you quibble about is whether I met you somehow when you’re in the House.”

    “I don’t think we ever met when you were in the House, and this idea that the only thing you’re upset about is not that you are for violence. What you’re upset about is that I called you a liar because you said it to my face. So it’s really more about this machismo that you have.”

    Paul was under some scrutiny for blocking fellow Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., from introducing Mullin at the start of the hearing, forcing Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., to do the introduction instead, three sources told Fox News’ Bill Melugin.

    “Rand Paul has become completely blinded by his hatred of President Trump and petty personal squabbles,” a senior Senate Republican source told Melugin. “His actions today were those of a seething snake — and a hopeless hypocrite.”

    “What kind of free speech advocate would bar Sen. Mullin’s choice to deliver his introduction from speaking?” the source asked. “What kind of Republican would bar a fellow Republican Senator from voicing their support of a colleague? Why is this guy allowed to hold a Republican gavel anymore?”

    Eric Mack is a writer for Fox News Digital covering breaking news.

  • 顶级保守派组织将家长权利斗争推向国会山,预计将与迈克·约翰逊会面


    自由妈妈组织自2021年成立以来规模显著扩大
    作者:伊丽莎白·埃尔金德
    福克斯新闻
    2026年3月18日美国东部时间上午8:00发布

    福克斯首发:一个倡导家长权利的顶级保守组织周三将前往国会山,与共和党人和民主党人会面,讨论跨性别问题及其他议程项目。

    自由妈妈组织正将其”家长誓言”带到国会,该组织成员预计将与来自路易斯安那州的共和党议长迈克·约翰逊及其他人士会面,以期扩大对其运动的支持,该运动旨在明确家长在学校及其他直接控制范围之外场所对子女所拥有的权利。

    该组织联合创始人兼首席执行官蒂娜·德斯科维奇告诉福克斯新闻数字版:”自由妈妈组织从20个州带来了100名成员来到国会山。”

    [国会共和党议员称,科洛伊·科尔法案旨在阻止未成年人接受改变生命的跨性别手术]

    她说,国会议员将与唐纳德·特朗普总统一起签署他们的誓言,德斯科维奇称这是”对美国人民的常识性承诺,即你支持他们的权利”。

    誓言中写道:”我承诺尊重父母的基本权利,包括但不限于指导子女教育、医疗保健和道德培养的权利。我承诺推进加强父母参与和决策的政策,提高透明度,抵御政府越权行为,并在各级政府中确保父母权利。”

    据透露,该组织的立法优先事项包括:关闭学校健康诊所,反对任何规避学校中父母权威的政策,并要求学校让父母全面了解课程、教案、评估和学习标准。

    在跨性别政策问题上,自由妈妈组织正推动维持学校体育、卫生间等按性别划分的空间,以及性别的生物学定义,并推广与学生和教职工性别一致的代词使用。

    自由妈妈组织成立于2021年,最初是为了反对新冠疫情对学生的限制措施。

    [点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序]

    此后,该组织已发展成为一个全国性团体,在全美各地设有多个分会。

    他们周三与约翰逊的会面意义重大,这标志着他们影响力的增强以及共和党对家长权利等文化战争问题的关注,尽管在11月中期选举中,他们仍在为保住控制权而奋力争取胜势。

    伊丽莎白·埃尔金德是福克斯新闻数字版的政治记者,主要报道众议院动态。此前曾在《每日邮报》和哥伦比亚广播公司新闻担任数字版专栏作家。

    在Twitter上关注她:@liz_elkind,或发送线索至elizabeth.elkind@fox.com

    Top conservative group takes parents’ rights fight to Capitol Hill, expected to meet with Mike Johnson

    Moms for Liberty has grown significantly since starting in 2021
    By Elizabeth Elkind
    Fox News
    Published March 18, 2026 8:00am EDT

    FIRST ON FOX:A top conservative organization advocating parents’ rights is descending on Capitol Hill Wednesday to meet with both Republicans and Democrats on the subject of transgender issues and other agenda items.

    Moms for Liberty is taking its “parents pledge” to Congress, with group members expected to sit down with Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and others in a bid to grow support for its movement to define what rights parents have over their children while in school and other places outside their immediate control.

    “Moms for Liberty brought 100 members from across 20 states to Capitol Hill,” the group’s co-founder and CEO Tina Descovich told Fox News Digital.

    [CHLOE COLE ACT AIMED AT BLOCKING MINORS FROM UNDERGOING LIFE-ALTERING TRANSGENDER SURGERIES, GOP LAWMAKER SAYS]

    She said members of Congress would join President Donald Trump in signing their pledge, which Descovich called “a commonsense promise to the American people that you support their rights.”

    The pledge states, “I pledge to honor the fundamental rights of parents, including, but not limited to the right to direct the education, medical care, and moral upbringing of their children. I pledge to advance policies that strengthen parental involvement and decision-making, increase transparency, defend against government overreach, and secure parental rights at all levels of government.”

    Among the group’s legislative priorities, Fox News Digital was told, are to eliminate school-based health clinics, oppose any policy that circumvents parental authority in schools, and require schools to give parents full access to curriculum, lesson plans, evaluations and learning standards.

    On the issue of transgender policies, Moms for Liberty is pushing to maintain sex-specific spaces like school sports and restrooms, as well as the biological definition of sex and promoting pronoun usage consistent with students and staff members’ sex.

    Moms for Liberty was established in 2021 to fight COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on students.

    [CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP]

    Since then, it’s ballooned into a nationwide group with multiple chapters across the country.

    And their meeting with Johnson on Wednesday is notable in that it’s a sign of their influence and Republicans’ focus on culture war issues like parental rights, even as they fight an uphill battle to keep control during the November midterms.

    Elizabeth Elkind is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital leading coverage of the House of Representatives. Previous digital bylines seen at Daily Mail and CBS News.

    Follow on Twitter at @liz_elkind and send tips to elizabeth.elkind@fox.com

  • 北约盟友拒绝参与霍尔木兹海峡行动,特朗普警告此举将对联盟造成后果 | 福克斯新闻


    作者:摩根·菲利普斯 | 福克斯新闻
    发布时间:2026年3月18日 美国东部时间上午10:56

    新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

    收听本文
    9分钟

    北约盟友拒绝参与重新开放霍尔木兹海峡的潜在行动,令总统唐纳德·特朗普感到沮丧,并引发部分美国官员对该联盟在重大全球危机中可靠性的质疑。

    特朗普警告称,与伊朗的霍尔木兹海峡对峙可能对北约造成严重后果,他认为盟友在享受全球安全的同时却不愿分担负担。

    “我们大多数北约‘盟友’已告知美国,他们不想卷入我们的军事行动,”总统周二在Truth Social平台上写道。

    “我们会保护他们,但他们在需要时不会为我们做任何事,尤其是在危急时刻。”他补充道。

    霍尔木兹海峡是全球经济的关键动脉,输送全球约20%的石油供应。即使是有限的中断也可能导致能源价格飙升,加剧全球经济压力。

    尽管北约的核心使命是区域防御,但盟友参与海峡安全保障将凸显该联盟是否有能力在欧洲以外投射力量,或是是否主要依赖美国来维护全球商业安全。

    这种不满情绪不仅限于白宫。

    共和党参议员林赛·格雷厄姆表示,盟友的缺乏支持“让我开始质疑这些联盟的价值”,并警告后果可能“广泛而深远”。

    特朗普还质疑北约的未来。

    “如果没有回应或回应是负面的,我认为这将对北约的未来非常不利,”他告诉《金融时报》。

    盟友犹豫,美国推进石油咽喉要道安全行动

    然而,欧洲盟友对美国领导的在霍尔木兹海峡针对伊朗的军事行动参与意愿极低。

    霍尔木兹海峡是伊朗与阿曼之间的狭窄水道,是全球约20%石油供应的主要运输路线。

    当前对峙源于美以对伊朗目标的升级打击,引发人们担忧德黑兰可能通过水雷、无人机或快速攻击艇破坏海峡航运作为报复。

    保险公司已开始拒绝为穿越海峡的船只投保,自美国领导的代号为“史诗之怒行动”(Operation Epic Fury)的任务启动以来,仅有极少数船只通过。

    英国已明确排除派遣军舰进入霍尔木兹海峡或附近伊朗水域的可能,表明将避免直接参与作战行动。

    相反,英国官员讨论了更有限的支持措施,包括使用扫雷无人机——这种无人系统用于探测和中和伊朗历史上用于威胁商业航运的低成本水雷。虽然此类系统可帮助保持航道畅通,但通常是在水雷部署后才起作用,无法实时阻止攻击。

    英国已允许美国使用其两个军事基地——印度洋的迪戈加西亚岛和英格兰的皇家空军费尔福德基地——用于针对伊朗的“特定且有限”防御行动。迪戈加西亚长期作为美国远程轰炸机行动和中东后勤的基地,而费尔福德基地是少数能部署美国战略轰炸机(包括B-52和B-2)的欧洲基地,可用于打击任务或威慑巡逻。

    法国同样拒绝参与作战行动,法国总统埃马纽埃尔·马克龙表示,任何护航任务只有在局势稳定后才可能实施。德国立场更坚决,完全排除参与,强调北约是防御性联盟,并非为当前伊朗危机这类冲突设计。

    尽管欧洲主要盟友拒绝参与,一些较小伙伴已表示愿意提供支持。

    爱沙尼亚外交部长玛格努斯·萨赫克纳表示,若华盛顿正式请求,该国愿讨论援助方式。

    乌克兰也表示将提供反伊朗无人机攻击的专业技术,包括低成本拦截无人机和乌克兰与俄罗斯战争中测试过的防空战术。美国和海湾伙伴已请求乌克兰协助,基辅方面表示准备分享系统和人员以防御伊朗空中威胁。

    “爱沙尼亚20年前才加入北约,乌克兰甚至不是成员国,但他们都准备行动,”一位欧洲政策分析师评论道,“与此同时,欧洲其他国家仍在讨论如何组建委员会研究此事。”

    全球石油流动受威胁

    霍尔木兹海峡作为全球能源供应的关键咽喉,因冲突升级出现航运中断,油轮在多次袭击和威胁后减速或停止航行。

    该水道输送约20%的全球石油和大量液化天然气,中断已推动原油价格突破每桶100美元。

    特朗普政府称可能部署海军护航保护商业油轮,但官员们仍在权衡风险和所需资源,尚未采取行动。

    欧洲各国海军能力参差不齐,只有英国和法国等少数国家能部署该地区高风险任务所需的资产。

    “只有英国和法国拥有实际可用的海军力量,”定期与海湾国家领导人互动的地缘政治分析师哈雷·利普曼表示,“其他欧洲海军规模太小、能力太弱。”

    保卫狭窄水道可能需要海军护航、防空反导和扫雷能力,同时必须在伊朗部队的射程内行动。

    “存在重大操作考量……这不是一个简单的行动环境,”专注跨大西洋关系的德国马歇尔基金会高级研究员克里斯汀·贝尔齐娜表示,“但还有更广泛的政治氛围影响参与决策。”

    这一背景包括对升级的担忧,以及对冲突起因和应对方式的分歧。

    欧洲官员未参与当前美伊军事行动的最初决策,几个政府强调去军事化和外交接触,而非直接参与。

    一些国家正寻求替代方案,包括外交努力确保海峡安全通行,而另一些国家则警惕进入拥挤且不稳定的行动环境,担心误判可能引发更广泛冲突。

    国内政治压力和优先事项竞争同样起作用,欧洲政府仍关注本土更紧迫的安全挑战,尤其是俄罗斯和乌克兰战争。

    贝尔齐娜表示,这一局势也反映了联盟本身的局限性。

    “北约是防御性联盟,”她说,“一旦进入中东,就取决于各盟友的具体能力。”

    利普曼认为,欧洲对该地区能源流动的依赖使当前犹豫难以解释。

    “他们从霍尔木兹海峡的石油中受益比我们更多,”他说。

    虽然美国消费者可能面临更直接的价格飙升,但欧洲因依赖进口天然气和难以快速替代供应,更易受长期中断影响。

    即使盟友选择参与,协调也将是主要障碍。

    “谁控制交战规则……与是否有足够船只同样重要,”她补充道。

    霍尔木兹危机暴露北约裂痕加深

    紧张局势恰逢跨大西洋联盟的实力和期望受到更广泛质疑。

    特朗普长期批评北约,反复声称美国承担了不成比例的负担,并质疑盟友是否会在危机中为美国防御。

    美国在俄罗斯入侵后领导支持乌克兰,这一冲突直接影响欧洲安全,而欧洲盟友提供了大量援助和资源。

    但欧洲政府迅速指出,2001年“9·11”事件后,北约首次援引集体防御条款响应对美袭击,欧洲盟友曾与美军并肩部署并承受重大伤亡。

    当前对峙可能标志着美欧安全合作方式的重大转变。

    “这是重新校准的时刻,”贝尔齐娜表示,“我们将看到关于欧洲盟友愿意考虑的角色的谈判。”

    特朗普推动收购北约盟友丹麦领土格陵兰岛的举措,已暴露联盟内部裂痕,欧洲领导人强烈反对,警告此举可能在全球威胁加剧时破坏团结。

    这些紧张局势与霍尔木兹海峡危机碰撞,美国寻求盟友支持却面临欧洲主要伙伴有限的意愿。

    与此同时,霍尔木兹海峡的中断可能给俄罗斯带来战略优势。全球油价因航运威胁飙升将增加莫斯科能源收入,支持其在西方制裁下的乌克兰战争。

    白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·利维特在接受福克斯新闻采访时表示:“我们在它们的领土上派驻数万军队,支付数十亿美元,而总统希望美国纳税人及军队得到公平对待。他认为北约有时对这些义务没有足够重视。”

    “他指出这一点是正确的,他要求盟友承担更多责任也是对的。”

    北约未立即回应置评请求。

    (完)

    NATO allies reject Hormuz mission as Trump warns of consequences for alliance | Fox News

    By Morgan Phillips | Fox News
    Published March 18, 2026 10:56am EDT

    Foundation for Defense of Democracies CEO Mark Dubowitz discusses whether there is room for negotiations with Iran as Operation Epic Fury continues on ‘The Will Cain Show.’

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    9 min

    NATO allies are declining to join a potential effort to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, frustrating President Donald Trump and prompting questions among some U.S. officials about the alliance’s reliability in a major global crisis.

    Trump has warned the Hormuz standoff with Iran could have serious consequences for NATO, arguing that allies benefit from global security without sharing the burden.

    “The United States has been informed by most of our NATO ‘Allies’ that they don’t want to get involved with our Military Operation,” the president wrote on Truth Social Tuesday.

    “We will protect them, but they will do nothing for us, in particular, in a time of need,” he said.

    The Strait of Hormuz is a vital artery for the global economy, carrying about 20% of the world’s oil supply. Even limited disruption can send energy prices soaring and strain economies worldwide.

    Though NATO’s core mission is regional defense, allied involvement in securing the strait would demonstrate whether the alliance can project power beyond Europe — or whether it relies primarily on the U.S. to safeguard global commerce.

    The frustration is spreading beyond the White House.

    Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said the lack of allied support “makes me second guess the value of these alliances,” warning the repercussions could be “wide and deep.”

    Trump also has questioned the future of the alliance.

    “If there’s no response or if it’s a negative response, I think it will be very bad for the future of NATO,” he told the Financial Times.

    Allies hold back as US moves to secure oil choke point

    European allies, however, have shown little willingness to join a U.S.-led military effort against Iran in the Strait of Hormuz.

    The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman that serves as the primary transit route for roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply.

    The current standoff follows escalating U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets, raising fears Tehran could retaliate by disrupting shipping through the strait using naval mines, drones or fast-attack vessels.

    Insurance companies have begun refusing to insure ships traversing the strait and a very limited number of ships have passed since the start of the U.S.-led mission against Iran known as Operation Epic Fury.

    The United Kingdom has ruled out sending warships into the Strait of Hormuz or nearby Iranian waters, signaling it will avoid direct involvement in combat operations.

    Instead, British officials have discussed more limited support, including the use of minesweeping drones — unmanned systems designed to detect and help neutralize naval mines, which Iran historically has used as a low-cost way to threaten commercial shipping. While such systems can help keep sea lanes open, they are typically used after mines are deployed and do not deter attacks in real time.

    The U.K. has permitted the U.S. to use two of its military bases — Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and Royal Air Force Fairford in England — for “specific and limited” defensive actions against Iran. Diego Garcia has long served as a staging ground for U.S. long-range bomber operations and logistics in the Middle East, while RAF Fairford is one of the few European bases capable of hosting U.S. strategic bombers, including B-52 and B-2 aircraft, which can be used for strike missions or deterrence patrols.

    France similarly has declined to participate in combat operations, with French President Emmanuel Macron saying any potential escort mission would only take place once the situation stabilizes. Germany has taken an even firmer stance, ruling out involvement entirely and emphasizing that NATO is a defensive alliance not designed for intervention in conflicts like the current Iran crisis.

    While larger European allies have declined to participate, some smaller partners have signaled a willingness to contribute.

    Estonia’s foreign minister, Margus Tsahkna, said the country is prepared to discuss how it could assist if Washington makes a formal request.

    Ukraine also has moved to provide expertise and technology to counter Iranian drone attacks, including low-cost interceptor drones and battlefield-tested air defense tactics developed during its war with Russia. U.S. and Gulf partners already have requested Ukrainian assistance, with Kyiv signaling it is prepared to share both systems and personnel to help defend against Iranian aerial threats.

    “Estonia joined NATO barely 20 years ago, Ukraine isn’t even a member, and they’re both ready to roll,” one European policy analyst said. “Meanwhile, the rest of Europe is still debating how to form a committee to form a working group to study the matter.”

    Global oil flows threatened

    The Strait of Hormuz — a critical choke point for global energy supplies — has seen shipping disrupted amid the escalating conflict, with tanker movements slowing or halting after repeated attacks and threats from Iran.

    The waterway carries roughly 20% of the world’s oil and significant volumes of liquefied natural gas, and the disruption has pushed crude prices above $100 per barrel.

    The Trump administration has said the U.S. could deploy naval escorts to protect commercial tankers, but so far has not done so as officials weigh the risks and resources required.

    Naval capability across Europe is uneven, with only a handful of countries — particularly the United Kingdom and France — able to deploy the kind of assets required for a high-risk mission in the region.

    “Only England and France really have any type of naval power that could be helpful,” said Harley Lippman, a geopolitical analyst who regularly engages with Gulf leaders, adding that other European navies are “too small and too weak.”

    Securing the narrow waterway likely would require naval escorts, air and missile defense, and mine-clearing capabilities, all while operating within range of Iranian forces.

    “There are significant operational considerations.… It is not a simple operating environment,” said Kristine Berzina, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, a Washington-based think tank focused on transatlantic relations. “But there’s also an overarching political climate” shaping decisions about involvement.

    That broader context includes concerns about escalation, as well as differences over how the conflict began and how it should be handled.

    European officials were not involved in the initial decision-making around the current U.S.–Iran military operation, and several governments have emphasized de-escalation and diplomatic engagement rather than direct participation.

    Some countries are pursuing alternative approaches, including diplomatic efforts to secure safe passage through the strait, while others are wary of entering a crowded and volatile operating environment where miscalculation could trigger a wider conflict.

    Domestic political pressures and competing priorities also play a role, as European governments remain focused on security challenges closer to home, particularly Russia and the war in Ukraine.

    Berzina said the situation also reflects the limits of the alliance itself.

    “NATO is a defensive alliance,” she said. “Once you get to the Middle East, you’re looking at the capabilities of individual allies.”

    Lippman argued that Europe’s reliance on energy flows through the region makes the current reluctance difficult to justify.

    “They benefit from the oil coming out of the Strait of Hormuz more than we do,” he said.

    While U.S. consumers may feel more immediate price spikes, Europe is more exposed to longer-term disruptions due to its reliance on imported natural gas and limited ability to quickly replace supply.

    Even if allies chose to participate, coordination would be a major hurdle.

    “Who controls under what rules of engagement… is as important as whether participants have enough ships,” she said.

    Hormuz crisis exposes growing cracks in NATO

    The tensions come amid broader questions about the strength and expectations of the transatlantic alliance.

    Trump long has been critical of NATO, repeatedly arguing that the United States bears a disproportionate share of the burden and questioning whether allies would come to America’s defense in a crisis.

    The U.S. has played a leading role in supporting Ukraine following Russia’s invasion — a conflict with direct implications for European security — while European allies have contributed significant aid and resources.

    But European governments are quick to note that after the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001, NATO invoked its collective defense clause for the first time in response to an attack on the United States. European allies also deployed forces to Afghanistan alongside U.S. troops and sustained significant casualties over the course of the war.

    The current standoff may signal a broader shift in how the U.S. and Europe approach security cooperation.

    “This is a moment of recalibration,” Berzina said. “We’ll see negotiations over the roles Europeans would be willing to consider.”

    Trump’s push to acquire Greenland, territory of NATO ally Denmark, has already exposed fault lines within the alliance, with European leaders pushing back forcefully and warning the move risked undermining unity at a time of rising global threats.

    Those tensions are now colliding with the crisis in the Middle East, as the U.S. looks for allied support in the Strait of Hormuz and finds limited appetite among key European partners.

    At the same time, disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz could hand a strategic advantage to Russia. Any sustained spike in global oil prices — driven by threats to shipping through the waterway — would boost Moscow’s energy revenues as it continues its war in Ukraine under Western sanctions.

    White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” on the matter, “We’re paying these countries billions of dollars, in our troops on their soil, (serving) as a deterrent for them. And the president wants the American taxpayer and our American military to be treated fairly. He feels sometimes with NATO, they are not.”

    “And he’s right to call that out, and he’s right to call on them to step up and do more,” she said.

    NATO could not immediately be reached for comment.

  • 国家情报总监塔尔西·加巴德称特朗普采取行动是因为他认定伊朗政权”构成迫在眉睫的威胁”


    乔·肯特周二辞去国家反恐中心主任职务,称其反对伊朗战争

    作者:亚历克斯·尼茨伯格
    福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年3月18日 美国东部时间上午9:22

    国家情报总监塔尔西·加巴德周二在X平台(原推特)发文指出,总统唐纳德·特朗普针对伊朗采取行动,是基于他认定伊朗政权”构成迫在眉睫的威胁”。

    她发表这篇推文之际,正值乔·肯特因反对特朗普两周多前与以色列联合对伊朗发动的战争而辞去国家反恐中心主任职务。

    加巴德在推文中表示:”唐纳德·特朗普以压倒性优势当选美国总统兼总司令。作为我们的总司令,他负责判断何为以及何为非迫在眉睫的威胁,并决定是否采取他认为必要的行动,以保护我们的军队、美国人民和国家的安全。”

    [白宫在反恐高级官员辞职后表示,特朗普拥有”确凿”证据表明伊朗将袭击美国]

    (国家情报总监塔尔西·加巴德于2025年12月2日在白宫内阁会议上。尤里·格里帕斯/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    她补充道:”国家情报总监办公室负责协助协调和整合所有情报,为总统兼总司令提供做出决策所需的最佳信息。”

    加巴德写道:”在仔细审查了他面前的所有信息后,特朗普总统认定伊朗这个恐怖主义伊斯兰政权构成迫在眉睫的威胁,并据此采取了行动。”

    [特朗普送别因伊朗战争辞职的情报官员:”他离开是件好事”]

    (总统唐纳德·特朗普于2026年3月17日离开美国国会大厦的爱尔兰之友午宴。内森·波斯纳/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    肯特周二公开分享了他的辞职信,称伊朗并未对美国构成迫在眉睫的威胁。

    他在辞职信中写道:”我不能良心不安地支持正在进行的伊朗战争。”

    他断言:”伊朗并未对我国构成迫在眉睫的威胁,很明显,我们发动这场战争是由于以色列及其强大的美国游说团体的压力。”

    [反恐高级官员因抗议美国对伊朗战争而辞职]

    (国家反恐中心主任乔·肯特于2025年12月11日在众议院国土安全委员会听证会上宣誓就职。汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    [点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用]

    特朗普周二予以回击,称”他离开是件好事,因为他说伊朗不是威胁。伊朗是个威胁。每个国家都意识到伊朗是个威胁。问题在于他们是否想采取行动。”

    亚历克斯·尼茨伯格是福克斯新闻数字版撰稿人。

    DNI Tulsi Gabbard says Trump acted because he concluded the Iranian regime ‘posed an imminent threat’

    Joe Kent resigned from his role as National Counterterrorism Center director on Tuesday, citing his opposition to the Iran war

    By Alex Nitzberg
    Fox News

    Published March 18, 2026 9:22am EDT

    Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Tuesday issued a post on X in which she noted that President Donald Trump targeted Iran based on his conclusion that the regime “posed an imminent threat.”

    She issued the post in the wake of Joe Kent’s resignation from his role as National Counterterrorism Center director over his opposition to the Iran war that Trump launched more than two weeks ago in conjunction with Israel.

    “Donald Trump was overwhelmingly elected by the American people to be our President and Commander in Chief. As our Commander in Chief, he is responsible for determining what is and is not an imminent threat, and whether or not to take action he deems necessary to protect the safety and security of our troops, the American people and our country,” Gabbard noted in her post.

    [WHITE HOUSE, AFTER TOP COUNTERTERRORISM OFFICIAL QUITS, SAYS TRUMP HAD ‘STRONG’ EVIDENCE IRAN WOULD ATTACK US]

    Tulsi Gabbard, director of National Intelligence, during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on Dec. 2, 2025.(Yuri Gripas/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    “The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is responsible for helping coordinate and integrate all intelligence to provide the President and Commander in Chief with the best information available to inform his decisions,” she added.

    “After carefully reviewing all the information before him, President Trump concluded that the terrorist Islamist regime in Iran posed an imminent threat and he took action based on that conclusion,” Gabbard wrote.

    [TRUMP BIDS GOODBYE TO INTEL OFFICIAL WHO RESIGNED OVER IRAN: ‘GOOD THING THAT HE’S OUT’]

    President Donald Trump departs a Friends of Ireland luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on March 17, 2026.(Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    Kent publicly shared his resignation letter on Tuesday, asserting that Iran did not pose an imminent threat to the U.S.

    “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran,” Kent wrote.

    “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby,” he asserted in the resignation letter.

    [TOP COUNTERTERRORISM OFFICIAL RESIGNS IN PROTEST OF US WAR AGAINST IRAN]

    Joe Kent, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, is sworn in to a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on Dec. 11, 2025.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    [CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP]

    Trump pushed back on Tuesday, saying that “it’s a good thing that he’s out because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat. Every country realized what a threat Iran was. The question is whether or not they wanted to do something about it.”

    Alex Nitzberg is a writer for Fox News Digital.