博客

李成钢：望美工商界继续为稳定中美经贸关系发挥建设性作用

2026年3月24日 13:35 联合早报

中国商务部副部长李成钢星期一（3月23日）会见美国拉夫劳伦公司首席执行官陆柏达时说，希望美工商界继续为稳定和深化中美两国经贸关系，发挥建设性作用。

中国商务部在官网公布，也是中国商务部国际贸易谈判代表的李成钢，引述中国国家主席习近平去年10月与美国总统特朗普会晤时的谈话内容强调，中美两国完全可以相互成就、共同繁荣。李成钢也说，中国始终致力于维护双边经贸关系稳定，为两国经贸合作营造良好预期。

李成钢说，总理李强在中国发展高层论坛2026年年会开幕式主旨演讲中强调，中国致力于做世界的“确定性基石”和“稳定性港湾”。

李成钢强调，“十五五”（2026年至2030年）规划纲要不仅是中国发展的新蓝图，也是世界发展的新机遇，中国将持续推动高质量发展，努力保持经济稳定增长，坚定不移扩大高水平对外开放，为外国企业提供更多市场机遇，打造良好营商环境。

中国商务部也说，李成钢希望拉夫劳伦继续深耕中国市场，向中国消费者提供更优质、更具创新性的产品。

以色列南部多地报告遭袭 正展开搜救

2026年3月24日 14:15 / 联合早报

伊朗3月24日继续袭击以色列各地，特拉维夫有建筑物被击中，黑烟涌现。 （路透社）

以色列国防军说，搜救部队正前往以色列南部多个报告遭到袭击的地点。

新华社报道，以色列国防军星期二（3月24日）发表声明，要求民众不要在遭到袭击的地点聚集。声明没有提供更多细节，尚不清楚是否有人员伤亡。

稍早前，伊朗伊斯兰共和国广播电视台报道，伊朗向以色列发动新一轮导弹袭击，称“导弹已突破以色列多个导弹防御系统”。

The Supreme Court’s conservatives could significantly alter the 2026 election | CNN Politics

Politics6 min read

The Supreme Court’s conservatives could significantly alter the 2026 election

By

[Joan Biskupic]

, CNN Chief Supreme Court Analyst

19 min ago

PUBLISHED Mar 24, 2026, 3:00 AM ET

Supreme Court Voting rights Congressional news Human rights

[See all topics]

Facebook Tweet[Email]Link Threads

Link Copied!

Top row: Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito; Bottom row: Associate Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett

CNN

The Supreme Court on Monday appeared ready to limit mail-in ballots, a move that would reinforce the justices’ pattern of shrinking voter protections and that has, at bottom, favored Republican interests and the Trump administration.

And at a time when some justices publicly minimize their internal divisions, Monday’s case testing whether mail-in ballots may be received after Election Day exposed the chasm between the left and right with respect to ballot access.

The case is one of two major Supreme Court disputes that could significantly affect the upcoming midterm elections. The court is expected to rule this spring on a pending case from Louisiana that involves the reach of a Voting Rights Act provision intended to protect against race discrimination.

Ad Feedback

The consequences of election-law disputes to democracy cannot be overstated. Who votes determines who obtains public office. And who holds office determines the policies, funding and other government benefits that shape the lives of all Americans.

Conservative justices expressed suspicion Monday that a Mississippi law permitting ballots with a timely postmark to be received within five business days of the election is valid under federal election laws. Those statutes, dating to 1845, establish the Tuesday after the first Monday in November as the date for federal elections.

As a practical matter, the Republican National Committee and other challengers to the Mississippi law and similar measures say such late-arriving ballots generate uncertainty and add to post-election chaos.

Liberal justices, meanwhile, emphasized regard for today’s widespread absentee-voting practices. About 30 states, to varying degrees, allow ballots that were mailed by Election Day to be counted if received soon after.

Among those supporting Mississippi are the Democratic National Committee and civil rights groups that emphasize people’s reliance on absentee voting for reasons of age or disability, work or educational responsibilities, and military service. They say a change would upset the expectations of millions of American voters who rely on absentee ballots and who, because of prevailing state practices, believe that a ballot that arrives just after Election Day will still be counted.

During the intense two hours of arguments, frustration on the left wing was palpable. “The people who should decide this issue are not the courts but Congress,” senior liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor said.

Right-wing justices poked holes in Mississippi’s claims and suggested they believed that, historically, Congress wanted all ballots to be received by a single national election day.

Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh latched onto arguments that late-arriving ballots bring concerns of fraud. And perhaps to counter claims by civil rights activists about the potential harm to certain classes of voters, he challenged Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart at one point: “Would you say that the states that require receipt by Election Day are disenfranchising voters?”

“No,” Stewart replied. “A reasonable ballot deadline does not do that. I would (add an) asterisk just there are the practical barriers for those overseas military voters.”

Is Election Day just one day?

Under the Constitution, states are responsible for the “times, places and manner” of elections, but Congress can “make or alter” such regulations. At the heart of the case is a series of federal statutes that set the election date for presidential electors and members of Congress.

“The Election Day statutes adopt a simple rule: States must make a final choice of officers by Election Day,” Stewart told the justices. He said that mandate is satisfied when voters “make their individual selections by Election Day,” even if the mailed ballot does not arrive then.

Stewart, defending a statute adopted by the state’s Republican-controlled legislature, noted that the statutes do not preclude any deadline extensions and that for decades Congress has respected state policies allowing the counting of ballots received after Election Day.

Lawyer Paul Clement, representing the RNC and other challengers, told the justices that Mississippi’s view defies federal law and would lead to further confusion in election results.

“If somebody in Gulfport the day after the election asks is the election over, the commonsense answer is no, it’s not. The ballots are still coming in,” Clement said. “And if somebody asks who won, the truthful answer is we don’t know why yet. The ballots are still coming in. And they may trickle in for weeks or months. And, in fact, they may trickle in for weeks or months with or without a postmark in differing ways in differing states. That reality gives the lie to the idea that we have a uniform national election day.”

Conservative justices voiced such fears of open-ended and extreme possibilities.

“You have a variety of line-drawing problems,” Justice Samuel Alito told Stewart, noting that a few states accept ballots weeks after an election. “So there’s no limit? Except I suppose the day when the presidential electors have to be appointed or the day when the next Congress begins …”

Alito also raised the specter of fraudulent ballots.

“Some of the briefs have argued that confidence in election outcomes can be seriously undermined if the apparent outcome of the election, on the day after the polls close, is radically flipped by the acceptance later of a big stash of ballots that flip the election,” Alito said.

Claims of fraud, raised without specific evidence, have been routine for the Trump administration, which argued with the Republican Party against the Mississippi law. President Donald Trump has sought to end most mail-in voting and is pressuring Congress to adopt a federal elections overhaul bill that would add strict voter-identification and proof-of-citizenship requirements.

“Obviously, they’ve sounded the antifraud theme,” Stewart said as he responded to Alito, adding, “They haven’t cited a single example of fraud from post-Election Day ballot receipt in this century.”

Future of the Voting Rights Act

Monday’s clash between the Democratic-appointed liberals on the bench and the Republican-appointed conservatives mirrored October’s hearing over the Voting Rights Act.

Justices on the right signaled they are likely to curtail the reach of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, intended to ensure equal access to the polls for Black voters and other racial minorities. That would buttress the court’s pattern, too, as in recent decades the conservative majority has erased multiple protections under the milestone law.

In dispute in that Louisiana case are “majority-minority” districts, used to remedy congressional maps that diluted the voting power of Black and Hispanic voters and to give them an opportunity to elect a preferred candidate.

Federal courts have traditionally ordered the creation of race-conscious districts after a finding that a state legislature discriminated as it drew map lines.

Several justices on the conservative wing have made clear they believe such race-conscious measures, tracing to the 1960s, simply are no longer needed in contemporary America.

A similar ideological split arose in the dueling positions Monday.

Kagan questioned whether, if Mississippi and its allies lose, federal Election Day statutes might later be found to preempt other established state practices.

“Once we say that these statutes, which don’t say anything, actually have some significant preemptive effect, where are going to end up?”

Supreme Court Voting rights Congressional news Human rights

[See all topics]

Facebook Tweet[Email]Link Threads

Link Copied!

Ad Feedback

Subscribe

Sign in

My Account

• [Settings]
• [Newsletters]
• [Topics you follow]
• [Sign out]

Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account

[](https://www.cnn.com/account/log-in)

*

[Listen][Watch]

*

• [US]
• [Crime & Justice]
• [Immigration]
• [Education]
• [Transportation]
• [Race & Identity]

• [World]
• [Africa]
• [Americas]
• [Asia]
• [Australia]
• [China]
• [Europe]
• [India]
• [Middle East]
• [United Kingdom]

• [Politics]
• [Trump]
• [Facts First]
• [CNN Polls]
• [2026 Elections]
• [Redistricting Tracker]
• [Epstein Files]

• [Business]
• [Tech]
• [Media]
• [Calculators]
• [Videos]

• [Markets]
• [Pre-markets]
• [After-Hours]
• [Fear & Greed]
• [Investing]
• [Markets Now]
• [Nightcap]

• [Health]
• [Life, But Better]
• [Fitness]
• [Food]
• [Sleep]
• [Mindfulness]
• [Relationships]

• [CNN Underscored]
• [Electronics]
• [Fashion]
• [Beauty]
• [Health & Fitness]
• [Home]
• [Reviews]
• [Deals]
• [Gifts]
• [Travel]
• [Outdoors]
• [Pets]

• [Entertainment]
• [Movies]
• [Television]
• [Celebrity]

• [Tech]
• [Innovate]

• [Style]
• [Arts]
• [Design]
• [Fashion]
• [Architecture]
• [Luxury]
• [Beauty]
• [Video]

• [Travel]
• [Destinations]
• [Food & Drink]
• [Stay]
• [News]
• [Videos]

• [Sports]
• [Pro Football]
• [College Football]
• [Basketball]
• [Baseball]
• [Soccer]
• [Olympics]

• [Science]
• [Space]
• [Life]
• [Unearthed]

• [Climate]
• [Solutions]
• [Weather]

• [Weather]
• [Video]
• [Climate]

• [Ukraine-Russia War]

• [Israel-Hamas War]

• [Watch]
• [Featured]
• [Shows & Films]
• [Network TV]
• [Clips]
• [CNN Headlines]
• [CNN Shorts]
• [Shows A-Z]
• [CNN 10]
• [CNN TV Schedules]

• [Listen]
• [CNN 5 Things]
• [Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta]
• [The Assignment with Audie Cornish]
• [One Thing]
• [Tug of War]
• [CNN Political Briefing]
• [The Axe Files]
• [All There Is with Anderson Cooper]
• [All CNN Audio podcasts]

• [Games]
• [Daily Crossword]
• [Jumble Crossword]
• [Photo Shuffle]
• [Sudoblock]
• [Sudoku]
• [5 Things Quiz]

• [Amazon Prime Day]

• [About CNN]
• [Subscribe]
• [Photos]
• [Investigations]
• [CNN Profiles]
• [CNN Leadership]
• [CNN Newsletters]
• [Work for CNN]

*

[](https://www.cnn.com/

共同社：日法拟加强合作开发下一代核电机组

发布/2026年3月24日 15:07 / 联合早报

日本内阁秘书长木原稔日前宣布，法国总统马克龙将于3月31日至4月2日到日本访问。 （法新社）

多名外交消息人士向共同社透露，日本和法国政府正在协调加强在开发下一代核电站，特别是小型模块化反应堆（SMR）方面的合作，拟在法国总统马克龙本月底访问东京时与日本首相高市早苗达成协议。

报道称，马克龙与高市早苗定3月31日举行峰会。预计两位领导人到时将发表一份联合声明，聚焦安全和能源领域的合作。峰会期间，两国外长和防长将举行“2+2”磋商会议，以确定具体合作细节。

两国还计划制定一份涵盖核能、人工智能（AI）、国际卫生等领域合作的联合文件。

法国今年担任七国集团（G7）轮值主席国，日本希望在广泛领域与这个核电大国深化双边关系。

外交人士说，高市早苗和马克龙将在会谈中就稳定能源供应的重要性达成共识，并计划确认在现有核电站安全运行以及乏燃料再利用的“核燃料循环”方面进行合作。

鉴于东京电力公司福岛第一核电站事故，峰会还将讨论推进反应堆退役工作。

预计日本外长茂木敏充和国防部长小泉进次郎将与法国外长巴罗和国防部长沃特兰举行2+2会议。双方将讨论扩大日本自卫队与法国军队的联合训练及网络领域的合作。日方可能会阐述国防强化政策，包括修订三份与安全相关的文件，例如《国家安全战略》。

此外，双方还将举行一系列会谈，就加强关键矿产供应链、确保AI安全、向印太地区第三国提供卫生支持等问题交换意见。

日本内阁秘书长木原稔日前宣布，马克龙将于3月31日至4月2日访问日本。

青瓦台：朝鲜敌对性言辞不利于和平共处

发布时间 / 来源：2026年3月24日 15:22 / 联合早报

青瓦台3月24日说，能够保障韩朝稳定繁荣的路线并不是敌对和对决，而是通过对话和合作实现和平共处。 （法新社）

韩国总统府对朝鲜领导人金正恩将韩国正式定为“头号敌国”一事表明，持续采用敌对性措辞对韩朝和平共处没有任何益处。

韩联社报道，青瓦台方面星期二（3月24日）说，能够保障韩朝稳定繁荣的路线并不是敌对和对决，而是通过对话和合作实现和平共处，韩国政府将从长远角度出发，一贯推进半岛和平共处政策。

韩国统一部官员当天接受采访时说，虽然金正恩重申“敌对的两国关系”路线，但韩国政府将基于推动韩朝关系发展成为追求统一的和平共处关系的原则，继续付出努力。

朝中社24日报道，金正恩23日在第十五届最高人民会议第一次会议上发表施政演说，正式将韩国定义为“头号敌国”，并将以最明确的言辞和行动，彻底无视排挤，对于韩国的挑衅行为，朝鲜将毫不犹豫地让韩国付出代价。

青瓦台：朝鲜敌对性言辞不利于和平共处

发布时间 / 来源：2026年3月24日 15:22 / 联合早报

青瓦台3月24日说，能够保障韩朝稳定繁荣的路线并不是敌对和对决，而是通过对话和合作实现和平共处。 （法新社）

韩国总统府对朝鲜领导人金正恩将韩国正式定为“头号敌国”一事表明，持续采用敌对性措辞对韩朝和平共处没有任何益处。

韩联社报道，青瓦台方面星期二（3月24日）说，能够保障韩朝稳定繁荣的路线并不是敌对和对决，而是通过对话和合作实现和平共处，韩国政府将从长远角度出发，一贯推进半岛和平共处政策。

韩国统一部官员当天接受采访时说，虽然金正恩重申“敌对的两国关系”路线，但韩国政府将基于推动韩朝关系发展成为追求统一的和平共处关系的原则，继续付出努力。

朝中社24日报道，金正恩23日在第十五届最高人民会议第一次会议上发表施政演说，正式将韩国定义为“头号敌国”，并将以最明确的言辞和行动，彻底无视排挤，对于韩国的挑衅行为，朝鲜将毫不犹豫地让韩国付出代价。

‘It’s a big deal’: Election expert weighs in on the Supreme Court case that could upend midterms | CNN Politics

Published 1:08 AM EDT, Tue March 24, 2026

On Monday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a challenge to a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted up to 5 days after an election. UCLA professor and election law expert Rick Hasen spoke with Laura Coates about the arguments. Hasen says that if the courts rule that ballots must be received by the election board by election day, more than a dozen states will have to change the way they administer elections.

No English content available

亲绿台媒：马英九掌握有人利用马办名义在大陆“做一些事”

发布时间 / 来源

马英九基金会的人事风波越演越烈，亲绿媒体《镜周刊》报道，台湾前总统马英九掌握近年一直有人利用“马办”名义在中国大陆“做一些事”，让他深感不妥。曾担任马英九基金会执行长的国民党副主席萧旭岑回应，“有人持续用影射的方式匿名放话，试图抹杀人格与最单纯的两岸交流“，并强调他绝对正面以对。

据《镜周刊》星期二（3月24日）报道，事件导火线源自马英九基金会一名随扈离职。这名长年跟随马英九的随扈日前卷入职场不当管理事件，事后自行请辞，同时把基金会的财务报告等内部资料交给前国安会秘书长金溥聪；金溥聪了解详情后，找上基金会董事高华柱告知此案，再由高华柱向马英九报告。

金溥聪曾经五度帮马英九竞选操盘，包括两次台北市长、一次国民党党主席以及两次总统选战，五战皆告捷。

马英九基金会上周聘请台北市立大学教授戴遐龄担任执行长，并在声明中特别提到戴遐龄的“人品端正，操守清廉”，引发外界联想。

王光慈原为马英九基金会副执行长，萧旭岑则是执行长。萧旭岑去年11月接任国民党副主席后，王光慈升任执行长，但仅接任三个月便离职。

《镜周刊》引述知情人士说：“发动整起人事调整案的，其实就是马英九本人。”

除了基金会运作问题，知情人士也说，马英九手上握有明确证据，足以证明近年确实有人一直以马办名义在大陆“做一些事”，并称这让马英九深感不妥。因此，马英九授权金溥聪与高华柱处理基金会的人事。

针对《镜周刊》的报道，萧旭岑星期二在脸书发文回应。他指出，有人持续用影射的方式匿名放话，试图抹杀人格与最单纯的两岸交流，“我绝对正面以对”。

萧旭岑进一步说，他从离开到现在都没有针对事件做积极回应，主要有两个原因。他说，首先如今两岸和平、台湾能源政策、国防议题等大是大非的事情，等着国民党去推进，不希望基金会的内部风波，影响到国民党主席郑丽文以及国民党的推动。

其次，对马英九感念与感谢。萧旭岑说，马英九对他有恩，因此即便他可能会遭受一些误解，也要维护马英九以及其家人。但他指出，这不代表有心人士可以利用这一点，疯狂对他抹黑，打击两岸关系。

萧旭岑最后在贴文中表示，他祝福马英九基金会未来继续努力，为马英九以及两岸交流加油。“但如果针对我个人的操守继续抹黑或不实指控，我一定捍卫到底。任何想要破坏两岸和平与两岸青年交流的恶势力，我一定坚决对抗到底。”

另据台媒报道，马英九基金会在星期一（3月23日）发布声明，基金会执行长戴遐龄称，近日有关前员工萧旭岑及王光慈离职的相关报道，因外界人士不明真相，许多内容妄自揣测，不符事实；已委请律师针对之前发生的严重违反财政纪律情事，尽快送请司法机关深入调查，毋枉毋纵。

戴遐龄表示，相信司法调查结果出炉，自会真相大白。她也说，外界人士若再有传述有损基金会或马英九名义的不实事项，基金会将采取法律行动，以正视听。

对此，萧旭岑回应，在基金会的一切作为，都有向马英九报告且经同意办理，一切符合纪律。

郑丽文星期一接受网络直播时指出，此次事件的“始作俑者”来自国民党内部，且原是马英九身边的人，长期以来对国民党造成许多无法恢复的伤害，国民党将力挺萧旭岑。郑丽文没有说明有关“始作俑者”的身份。

陆委会咨委：大陆将台海“内水化”企图影响台地方选举

发布时间 / 来源：2026年3月24日 11:08 / 联合早报

台湾政府的大陆委员会咨询委员认为，中国大陆透过常态化执法将台海“内水化”，展现对台具管辖权，并可能提升对台灰带侵扰力度，企图影响台湾今年底的地方选举。

台陆委会星期一（3月23日）在官网发布新闻稿介绍，该会日前举行咨询委员会议，讨论对中国大陆“两会”的观察，学者与咨委参与讨论。

学者指出，今年大陆“两会”整体政策方向未见结构性改变，大陆政府工作报告虽将经济增长目标下修到4.5至5%，创1991年以来最低水准，但仍继续采取更积极的财政政策、适度宽松的货币政策，高赤字率及特别国债支出成为新常态。

学者称，有党政官员持续高举“习核心”领导地位；“十五五”（2026年至2030年）规划纲要重申发展新质生产力、科技自立自强、提振内需消费、绿色转型、防风险促安全等政策目标，在短期内不会有重大调整。对台政策提及打击“台独”、推动同等待遇、弘扬中华文化等，也为其一贯立场，未见明显变化。

部分咨委认为，今年“两会”政策基调由先前的积极扩张转趋保守防御，凸显将迈入第四任期的中共总书记习近平更重视经济韧性、政治安全、军队忠诚。此一转变可能反映中国大陆政经社军各领域均面临重大转型，也可能是因国际局势变化，如美以袭击伊朗等，强化对美斗争准备。

有咨委观察到，中国大陆当前面临多重结构性困境，包括经济成长动能不足、财政压力加剧、消费疲弱、产能过剩、“内卷”竞争及人口老化等问题，若加强发展新质生产力，恐影响传统产业，衍生失业问题。

部分咨委指出，习近平近期高度关注军队整顿与忠诚问题，警告解放军不能“怀有二心”，重申政治建军，显示对军队的要求将以政治忠诚为首要，强调“红大于专”。在近期大规模肃清后，二十届五中全会甄补情形值予关注。大陆2026年军费增长7%，高于GDP增长目标，反映其将持续推动军队现代化建设。

有咨委提醒，“两会”通过《民族团结进步促进法》，将裁罚对象由过去的“作为犯”扩大至“不作为犯”；若被认定不积极促进民族团结都可能被推定为“不作为”，且鼓励民众相互举报并允许地方自订法规，对艺文、新闻工作者等的影响不容小觑。

部分咨委分析，当前大陆对台工作重点包括“反独促统”法制化、推动两岸共同市场、争取台青认同。