博客

  • 冰壶——美国冰壶选手鲁奥霍宁称明尼苏达州发生的事情是错误的


    By Aadi Nair
    2026年2月10日 美国中部时间上午10:51 更新于2小时前

    美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市,2026年2月5日,地方和州警察在宣布非法集会后站岗,示威者聚集在他们认为被联邦探员使用的酒店外。路透社/Seth Herald 购买许可权,在新标签页打开

    科尔蒂纳丹佩佐,意大利,2月10日(路透社) – 冰壶选手里奇·鲁奥霍宁周二成为最新一位就国内政治发声的美国运动员,他谴责其家乡明尼苏达州的移民大扫荡行动,而该州正是这项运动的热门地区。

    在冬奥会期间,多位美国运动员就国内事件发表了看法,其中滑雪运动员亨特·赫斯被愤怒的美国总统唐纳德·特朗普称为“真正的失败者”。

    路透社内部动态通讯是您了解全球体育重大赛事的必备指南。点击此处注册。

    “我想说,我很自豪能代表美国队和我们的国家来到这里参赛。但如果我们不至少提及明尼苏达州正在发生的事情,那就是我们的疏忽,”在明尼苏达州执业的54岁人身伤害律师鲁奥霍宁表示。

    广告 · 滚动继续

    “对每个人来说,这都是一段艰难的时期。这些事情就发生在我们居住的地方附近,”他在新闻发布会结束时的声明中补充道。

    移民和海关执法局(ICE)探员在特朗普推进打击非法移民的行动中杀害了两名美国公民后,明尼苏达州各地发生了抗议活动。

    “我是一名律师,你们知道,我们有宪法,它赋予我们言论自由,”鲁奥霍宁继续说道。

    “它保护我们免受不合理的搜查和扣押。并且规定,必须有合理理由才能对我们进行拦截。明尼苏达州发生的事情是错误的。没有灰色地带,这很明显。”

    广告 · 滚动继续

    冰壶重镇

    明尼苏达州是美国的冰壶重镇,培养了包括约翰·舒斯特在内的众多奥运选手,舒斯特曾带领男子冰壶队在2018年平昌奥运会上夺得金牌。

    作为男子队的替补队员,鲁奥霍宁表示,他为家乡民众的公开表达感到自豪。

    “我真的很喜欢现在明尼苏达州发生的事情。人们走出来,展现爱、同情、正直以及对陌生人的尊重,并帮助他们,”他说。

    “我们爱明尼苏达州的这种精神……我们爱我们的国家。我们为美国而战,为彼此而战,为我们的家人和朋友而战,他们为了今天能来到这里付出了巨大的牺牲。”

    他表示,奥运会体现了明尼苏达州同胞所展现的相同价值观。

    “奥运会的意义在于卓越、尊重和友谊。我认为我们都在践行这些。我们为明尼苏达州人民和全国拥有相同价值观、同情心、爱与尊重的人们而战。”

    报道:Aadi Nair;编辑:Andrew Cawthorne

    我们的标准:路透社信托原则。

    Curling-What’s happening in Minnesota is wrong, says US curler Ruohonen

    By Aadi Nair
    February 10, 2026 10:51 AM UTC Updated 2 hours ago

    节点运行失败

    Local and state police stand guard after declaring unlawful assembly, as demonstrators gathered outside a hotel they believe is being used by federal agents, amid increased immigration enforcement in Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S., February 5, 2026. REUTERS/Seth Herald Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    CORTINA D’AMPEZZO, Italy, Feb 10 (Reuters) – Curler Rich Ruohonen became the latest U.S. athlete to weigh into domestic politics on Tuesday, condemning immigration sweeps in his home state of Minnesota that is a hotbed for the sport.

    Various American athletes at the Winter Games have spoken out over events back home, with skier Hunter Hess labelled a “real loser” by an irritated U.S. President Donald Trump.

    The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

    “I’d like to say I’m proud to be here to represent Team USA, and to represent our country. But we’d be remiss if we didn’t at least mention what’s going on in Minnesota,” said Ruohonen, a 54-year-old personal injury lawyer who works in Minnesota.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad

    “What a tough time it’s been for everybody. This stuff is happening right around where we live,” he added in a statement at the end of a press conference.

    Protests have been taking place around Minnesota after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents killed two U.S. citizens as part of Trump’s push against illegal immigration.

    “I am a lawyer, as you know. We have a constitution, and it allows us freedom of speech,” Ruohonen went on.

    “It protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures. And makes it that we have to have probable cause to be pulled over. What’s happening in Minnesota is wrong. There’s no shades of grey. It’s clear.”

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    CURLING STRONGHOLD

    Minnesota is a curling stronghold in the U.S. and has produced a number of Olympic competitors including John Shuster, who skipped the men’s team to gold at the 2018 Pyeongchang Games.

    Ruohonen, an alternate for the men’s team, said he was proud of the public expressions in his home.

    “I really love what’s been happening there now. With people coming out, showing the love, the compassion, the integrity and respect for others that they don’t know, and helping them out,” he said.

    “We love Minnesota for that … We love our country. We’re playing for the U.S. We’re playing for each other, we’re playing for our family and our friends that sacrificed so much to get here today.”

    The Olympics, he said, embody the same values as those shown by compatriots in Minnesota.

    “What the Olympics means is excellence, respect, friendship. We all, I think, exemplify that. We are playing for the people of Minnesota and the people around the country who share those same values, that compassion, that love, and that respect.”

    Reporting by Aadi Nair; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 黄伟中:年轻人不“卷”也不“躺平” 他们是在理性规划未来


    发布/2026年2月10日 20:42 / 联合早报

    财政部兼人力部高级政务次长黄伟中在人力部大厦接受《联合早报》专访,畅谈青年就业和女性重返职场面临的困难,以及他从社区义工到国会议员的心路历程。 (郑一鸣摄)

    “我不认为现在的年轻一代‘卷’,他们是非常理性的分析者,要比我这一代人更细腻且有层次。”

    针对当下社交媒体热议的年轻人“内卷”或“躺平”现象,财政部兼人力部高级政务次长黄伟中认为,这些本地青年没有在盲目的竞争中自我消耗,而是展现出极强的分析能力与规划意识。

    黄伟中日前在人力部大厦接受《联合早报》专访。这名2024年5月受委高级政务次长的前新加坡空军部队战斗机飞行员,在访问中畅谈青年就业和女性重回职场所面对的困难,以及他从社区义工到国会议员的心路历程。

    黄伟中原是受委教育部兼财政部高级政务次长,在去年5月全国大选后改任财政部兼人力部高级政务次长,他在人力部主管的范围包括女性劳动力和青年就业。

    他指出,比起过去人们循序渐进的就业途径,现在的年轻人接触资讯的渠道更广,对行业前景的判断也更为敏锐。“他们可以根据需要自行权衡,然后迅速调整方向,这得益于更强的数码与技术能力。”

    年轻人选择“空档年”与“职业休整期”值得肯定

    现在也有不少年轻人毕业后不急着找工作,给自己“空档年”(gap year)体验人生或寻找海外机会,以及在工作一段时间之后决定进入“职业休整期”(Career break),先“躺平”,不急着开始下一段就业。

    黄伟中认为,只要是为了探索世界或尝试不同行业,这些选择都可以帮助年轻人更精准地找到下一份工作,是值得肯定的策略。

    他同青年交流时,也会建议他们在寻找见习机会时,不一定要寻求进入知名大企业,而是要广泛地探索,了解自己真正的需要。

    不过,人工智能的崛起不可避免地冲击就业市场,白领低级别工作岗位所面对的影响最大。这不免让一些职场新人产生焦虑,担心自己会被科技取代。

    黄伟中透露,2026财年预算案公布前,他在民情联系组(REACH)的安排下,到聆听站了解初入职场的青年对未来有什么看法。有三名从事临床影像分析工作的年轻人,清楚看到人工智能的发展,担心自己会被取代,因此最关心的不是生活费或屋价等问题。

    他说:“他们最关注的是自己能否保持竞争力,以及政策可以从哪些方面帮助他们看清未来的发展,从而保持一定的职业韧性。”

    黄伟中认为,这些焦虑感是健康的,因为年轻人正在有意识地采取积极行动。在这种情况下,政府的角色是提供前瞻的建议与培训支持,比如帮助他们在同行业或相邻领域,寻找下一个发展方向;或者如果他们希望转型,他们需要什么样的跑道和准备来进入一个更适合他们的新领域。

    女性30岁后就业断崖式下滑 人力部三管齐下应对

    在谈到本地女性就业的情况时,黄伟中指出新加坡女性的劳动参与率(80.5%)虽然高于经济合作组织成员国家的平均水平(77%),但本地的情况是女性就业在30岁之后就会出现明显的断崖式下跌,降幅超过10个百分点,只剩下70.2%。

    他分析,这主要受亚洲社会价值观影响,女性往往会在30岁至40岁之间成为夹心层,承担起照顾年幼孩童与父母的责任。为此,人力部正从三个方面着手,鼓励女性重回职场,包括增加陪产假和共享育儿假、推动灵活工作安排,以及推出再培训计划。

    黄伟中指出,帮助人们重回职场的关键,最理想的方式就是对原来的行业保留一定的接触,比如通过较低的工作量或灵活工作安排,避免完全脱节。

    他也说,随着人口老龄化和兼顾职场与育儿的需求,对外籍帮佣的需求持续上升。目前女佣来源国主要集中在印度尼西亚、菲律宾和缅甸,但政府正考虑扩大来源,以确保聘用帮佣的成本是可以负担的。

    家政服务计划(Household Services Scheme)这些年取得迅速发展,提供部分时间家政服务的公司,已从18家增加至超过200家,这或许能给不需要全职帮佣的家庭,提供一种平衡成本与需求的新选择。

    曾是午餐时间另一工作地点 接手达曼裕廊是“老义工回家”

    对大多数上班族而言,午餐时间是难得的休息时刻,但黄伟中还在空军部队任职时,那却是一段争分夺秒的行程。

    财政部兼人力部高级政务次长黄伟中从政前在达曼裕廊基层当义工,曾每天午餐时间从办公室赶到达曼裕廊协调社区服务工作。他形容2023年接手尚达曼总统做议员时原本负责的这一区,就像是回家一样。(邝启聪摄)

    原来,黄伟中2010年起就在达曼裕廊当义工,并在2011年联合发起一个名为“Gift of Development”的社区计划,给弱势家庭的小孩提供一个课后可以温习功课的空间。

    他当时的办公室在武吉甘柏的国防部总部,每天中午12时半就会开车一路赶到达曼裕廊,安排好孩子的午餐以及义工的任务,再匆匆开车赶回国防部上班。

    在计划下受益的,有生意破产后从头重建家庭经济的父母,他们的四个年幼女儿在托管中心长大,从当年的困顿中走出,如今已经长大成人并拥有各自的生活;还有曾因毒品入狱的父亲,如今家庭美满,两个女儿刚获得教育储蓄奖学金。

    黄伟中在这些看似琐碎的社区工作中得到极大的满足感。他日前接受《联合早报》专访时说:“我无法用文字形容看到这些家庭生活获得改善时的喜悦,也正是这些实例给了我日后投身公共服务的动力。”

    黄伟中是在2020年大选中,在原裕廊集选区当选国会议员,负责裕泉基层事务。2023年,负责达曼裕廊的时任国务资政尚达曼辞去议席参选总统,这一区的工作交到黄伟中手里。

    接手尚达曼留下的基层事务,黄伟中受访时坦言这是个艰巨的任务,但他事实上也是“回家”。他形容:“我和这一区大多数义工和基层领袖一起长大,也认识许多居民,所以这更像回家。”

    他也说,作为曾受教于尚达曼多年的“徒弟”,在心存感激之余也清楚必须通过不同的能力与经验,带领一个年轻有活力的团队,去适应新时代的需求。接下来,他希望鼓励更多年轻人投身志愿服务,以及通过邻里间的日常互动与观察,为居民提供难以替代的人文关怀。

    黄伟中:年轻人不“卷”也不“躺平” 他们是在理性规划未来

    发布/2026年2月10日 20:42 / 联合早报

    财政部兼人力部高级政务次长黄伟中在人力部大厦接受《联合早报》专访,畅谈青年就业和女性重返职场面临的困难,以及他从社区义工到国会议员的心路历程。 (郑一鸣摄)

    “我不认为现在的年轻一代‘卷’,他们是非常理性的分析者,要比我这一代人更细腻且有层次。”

    针对当下社交媒体热议的年轻人“内卷”或“躺平”现象,财政部兼人力部高级政务次长黄伟中认为,这些本地青年没有在盲目的竞争中自我消耗,而是展现出极强的分析能力与规划意识。

    黄伟中日前在人力部大厦接受《联合早报》专访。这名2024年5月受委高级政务次长的前新加坡空军部队战斗机飞行员,在访问中畅谈青年就业和女性重回职场所面对的困难,以及他从社区义工到国会议员的心路历程。

    黄伟中原是受委教育部兼财政部高级政务次长,在去年5月全国大选后改任财政部兼人力部高级政务次长,他在人力部主管的范围包括女性劳动力和青年就业。

    他指出,比起过去人们循序渐进的就业途径,现在的年轻人接触资讯的渠道更广,对行业前景的判断也更为敏锐。“他们可以根据需要自行权衡,然后迅速调整方向,这得益于更强的数码与技术能力。”

    年轻人选择“空档年”与“职业休整期”值得肯定

    现在也有不少年轻人毕业后不急着找工作,给自己“空档年”(gap year)体验人生或寻找海外机会,以及在工作一段时间之后决定进入“职业休整期”(Career break),先“躺平”,不急着开始下一段就业。

    黄伟中认为,只要是为了探索世界或尝试不同行业,这些选择都可以帮助年轻人更精准地找到下一份工作,是值得肯定的策略。

    他同青年交流时,也会建议他们在寻找见习机会时,不一定要寻求进入知名大企业,而是要广泛地探索,了解自己真正的需要。

    不过,人工智能的崛起不可避免地冲击就业市场,白领低级别工作岗位所面对的影响最大。这不免让一些职场新人产生焦虑,担心自己会被科技取代。

    黄伟中透露,2026财年预算案公布前,他在民情联系组(REACH)的安排下,到聆听站了解初入职场的青年对未来有什么看法。有三名从事临床影像分析工作的年轻人,清楚看到人工智能的发展,担心自己会被取代,因此最关心的不是生活费或屋价等问题。

    他说:“他们最关注的是自己能否保持竞争力,以及政策可以从哪些方面帮助他们看清未来的发展,从而保持一定的职业韧性。”

    黄伟中认为,这些焦虑感是健康的,因为年轻人正在有意识地采取积极行动。在这种情况下,政府的角色是提供前瞻的建议与培训支持,比如帮助他们在同行业或相邻领域,寻找下一个发展方向;或者如果他们希望转型,他们需要什么样的跑道和准备来进入一个更适合他们的新领域。

    女性30岁后就业断崖式下滑 人力部三管齐下应对

    在谈到本地女性就业的情况时,黄伟中指出新加坡女性的劳动参与率(80.5%)虽然高于经济合作组织成员国家的平均水平(77%),但本地的情况是女性就业在30岁之后就会出现明显的断崖式下跌,降幅超过10个百分点,只剩下70.2%。

    他分析,这主要受亚洲社会价值观影响,女性往往会在30岁至40岁之间成为夹心层,承担起照顾年幼孩童与父母的责任。为此,人力部正从三个方面着手,鼓励女性重回职场,包括增加陪产假和共享育儿假、推动灵活工作安排,以及推出再培训计划。

    黄伟中指出,帮助人们重回职场的关键,最理想的方式就是对原来的行业保留一定的接触,比如通过较低的工作量或灵活工作安排,避免完全脱节。

    他也说,随着人口老龄化和兼顾职场与育儿的需求,对外籍帮佣的需求持续上升。目前女佣来源国主要集中在印度尼西亚、菲律宾和缅甸,但政府正考虑扩大来源,以确保聘用帮佣的成本是可以负担的。

    家政服务计划(Household Services Scheme)这些年取得迅速发展,提供部分时间家政服务的公司,已从18家增加至超过200家,这或许能给不需要全职帮佣的家庭,提供一种平衡成本与需求的新选择。

    曾是午餐时间另一工作地点 接手达曼裕廊是“老义工回家”

    对大多数上班族而言,午餐时间是难得的休息时刻,但黄伟中还在空军部队任职时,那却是一段争分夺秒的行程。

    财政部兼人力部高级政务次长黄伟中从政前在达曼裕廊基层当义工,曾每天午餐时间从办公室赶到达曼裕廊协调社区服务工作。他形容2023年接手尚达曼总统做议员时原本负责的这一区,就像是回家一样。(邝启聪摄)

    原来,黄伟中2010年起就在达曼裕廊当义工,并在2011年联合发起一个名为“Gift of Development”的社区计划,给弱势家庭的小孩提供一个课后可以温习功课的空间。

    他当时的办公室在武吉甘柏的国防部总部,每天中午12时半就会开车一路赶到达曼裕廊,安排好孩子的午餐以及义工的任务,再匆匆开车赶回国防部上班。

    在计划下受益的,有生意破产后从头重建家庭经济的父母,他们的四个年幼女儿在托管中心长大,从当年的困顿中走出,如今已经长大成人并拥有各自的生活;还有曾因毒品入狱的父亲,如今家庭美满,两个女儿刚获得教育储蓄奖学金。

    黄伟中在这些看似琐碎的社区工作中得到极大的满足感。他日前接受《联合早报》专访时说:“我无法用文字形容看到这些家庭生活获得改善时的喜悦,也正是这些实例给了我日后投身公共服务的动力。”

    黄伟中是在2020年大选中,在原裕廊集选区当选国会议员,负责裕泉基层事务。2023年,负责达曼裕廊的时任国务资政尚达曼辞去议席参选总统,这一区的工作交到黄伟中手里。

    接手尚达曼留下的基层事务,黄伟中受访时坦言这是个艰巨的任务,但他事实上也是“回家”。他形容:“我和这一区大多数义工和基层领袖一起长大,也认识许多居民,所以这更像回家。”

    他也说,作为曾受教于尚达曼多年的“徒弟”,在心存感激之余也清楚必须通过不同的能力与经验,带领一个年轻有活力的团队,去适应新时代的需求。接下来,他希望鼓励更多年轻人投身志愿服务,以及通过邻里间的日常互动与观察,为居民提供难以替代的人文关怀。

  • 参议院加紧行动避免特朗普任内第三次政府停摆,国土安全部协议雏形显现


    By Alex Miller | 福克斯新闻

    2026年2月10日 美国东部时间上午6:00发布

    参议院正紧急行动,以避免唐纳德·特朗普总统任内第三次政府停摆。在谈判看似陷入僵局后,议员们谨慎乐观地认为可能达成协议。

    据熟悉谈判情况的消息人士向福克斯新闻数字频道透露,参议院共和党人周末收到了参议院民主党人的”党派诉求清单”。白宫也提交了自己的反建议,但截至周一晚间,一些议员尚未明确该方案的具体内容。

    包括南达科他州共和党参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩在内的一些议员不愿透露具体细节,但指出国会民主党人和白宫正在”交换文件”,并暗示这种来回沟通是谈判取得进展的良好迹象。

    但议员们尚未摆脱困境,图恩自参议院民主党要求国土安全部(DHS)延长两周资金以来就一直警告这一点。国会必须在周五前避免停摆,几乎没有时间在两院之间推进短期临时拨款法案。

    共和党警告民主党移民改革推动实为削减边境执法资金的幌子

    共和党人正在考虑另一项短期拨款延长,即继续决议案(CR),以避免部分停摆。图恩表示,民主党人是否会签署取决于背景谈判的进展情况,但暗示到目前为止,事态正朝着解决方案发展。

    “基于我对目前讨论的了解,我认为存在达成协议的可能,但要等提案回来后才能有更清楚的认识,”图恩说,”我们有机会对其进行评估。”

    图恩稍后表示,他计划在周二提出另一项继续决议案,但指出期限”还需要谈判确定”。”让我们看看第二天会带来什么,然后再继续推进。”

    民主党人的主要目标是约束美国移民和海关执法局(ICE),这是在亚历克斯·普雷蒂和蕾妮·妮可·古德被枪杀之后提出的。

    他们提交的提案中包含一些共和党人认为难以接受的内容,包括要求ICE探员获得司法令状、摘下面罩并准备好身份证明——共和党一些人警告称,这样做会导致更多探员遭到”公开信息曝光”(doxxing),即个人私人信息如地址被公之于众。

    纽约州民主党参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默警告称,共和党人回应的”时钟正在滴答作响”。

    停摆暂避,但参议院警告国土安全部争端可能在数日内引发新一轮停摆

    “我们已经向你们提交了提案,这些提案非常合理,”舒默在参议院发言时表示,”我希望我们这边的同事,至少是参议院中的许多人,认识到情况需要改变,表明他们准备采取有意义的行动。”

    在民主党人最终在周六提交其诉求的立法版本之前,共和党人曾公开质疑他们是否真的希望进行严肃谈判。但周末情况发生了变化。

    一名白宫官员告诉福克斯新闻,”特朗普总统始终如一,他希望政府保持开放,政府一直在与两党合作,确保美国人民不必再忍受另一场漫长、毫无意义且伤人的停摆。”

    与此同时,第三次可能停摆的范围和规模将仅限于国土安全部,但实际上只会影响联邦紧急事务管理局(FEMA)、运输安全管理局(TSA)、海岸警卫队以及该机构伞下的其他优先事项。这是因为ICE和移民行动正从特朗普的”巨额漂亮法案”中获得数十亿美元资金支持。

    “认为美国人的安全不是首要考虑因素,我认为这对民主党人来说是一个巨大的错误,我当然希望他们能继续真诚行事,”阿拉巴马州共和党参议员、国土安全支出小组委员会主席凯蒂·布里特表示。

    “因为你确实知道,ICE以及海关和边境巡逻队将继续获得资金支持,”她补充道。

    舒默与杰弗里斯修复裂痕,在最后期限临近之际就国土安全部改革展现统一阵线

    上议院的局势很快也将变得复杂。议员们定于本周四离开华盛顿特区开始为期一周的休会,许多人还将前往慕尼黑安全会议。

    该会议从最后期限当天开始并持续到周末。图恩警告称,如果避免国土安全部停摆的进展甚微,他可能会取消即将到来的休会。

    尽管如此,参议院民主党人认为现在主动权掌握在共和党人手中,并等待其对手采取行动。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    “我的意思是,我认为他们相当通情达理,”康涅狄格州民主党参议员、参议院国土安全拨款小组委员会最高民主党成员克里斯·墨菲表示。

    “我的意思是,我们没有要求遥不可及的目标,”他继续说道,”我们只是要求对ICE在恐吓美国城市的方式进行有针对性但有影响力的改革。显然,我们愿意进行谈判。”

    亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道记者,负责报道美国参议院新闻。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6388744851112

    Senate races to avert third shutdown as DHS deal takes shape

    By Alex Miller | Fox News

    Published February 10, 2026 6:00am EST

    The Senate is scrambling to avoid a third government shutdown under President Donald Trump, and after negotiations seemingly appeared to hit a brick wall, lawmakers are cautiously optimistic that a deal could be made.

    Senate Republicans received Senate Democrats’ “partisan wishlist” of demands over the weekend, sources familiar with negotiations told Fox News Digital. The White House sent over its own counter-proposal, but several lawmakers weren’t clear what was in the package as of Monday night.

    Some, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., wouldn’t say, but noted that congressional Democrats and the White House were “trading papers,” and signaled that the back and forth activity was a good sign of negotiations moving forward.

    But lawmakers aren’t out of the woods yet, a reality that Thune warned of since Senate Democrats demanded a two-week funding extension for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Congress has until Friday to avert a shutdown and little time to actually move a short-term patch from one side of the building to the other.

    REPUBLICANS WARN DEMOCRATS’ ICE REFORM PUSH IS COVER TO DEFUND BORDER ENFORCEMENT

    Republicans are mulling another short-term extension, known as a continuing resolution (CR), to avert a partial shutdown. Thune said whether Democrats would sign off depended on how well background negotiations were going, but hinted that so far, things were moving toward a solution.

    “I think, based on what I’m familiar with about the discussion so far, I think there is, but we’ll know more when the proposal comes back,” Thune said. “Let’s have a chance to evaluate it.”

    Thune later said that he planned to tee up another CR on Tuesday, but noted that the length would “have to be negotiated. But let’s see what the next day brings, and we’ll go from there.”

    Democrats’ prime objective is reining in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), following the fatal shootings of Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good.

    The proposal they submitted included items that are a bridge too far for Republicans, including requiring ICE agents to get judicial warrants, de-mask and have identification ready — some in the GOP warn doing so would lead to more agents being doxxed, or when a person’s private information is made public, like their address.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., warned that the “clock is ticking” for Republicans to respond.

    SHUTDOWN AVERTED FOR NOW, BUT SENATE WARNS DHS FIGHT COULD TRIGGER ANOTHER IN DAYS

    “We have sent you our proposals, and they are exceedingly reasonable,” Schumer said on the Senate floor. “I hope our colleagues on the other side, many of whom, at least here in the Senate, recognize that things need to change, show they’re ready to act in a meaningful way.”

    Prior to Democrats finally handing over the legislative version of their demands on Saturday, Republicans publicly questioned if they actually wanted to have serious negotiations. That changed over the weekend.

    A White House official told Fox News that “President Trump has been consistent, he wants the government open and the Administration has been working with both parties to ensure the American people don’t have to endure another drawn-out, senseless, and hurtful shutdown.”

    Meanwhile, the scope and scale of a possible third closure would be limited to just the DHS, but would really only have an effect on FEMA, TSA, the Coast Guard and other priorities under the agency’s umbrella. That’s because ICE and immigration operations are flush with billions from Trump’s “big, beautiful bill.”

    “To say that the security of Americans is not paramount, I think, would be a huge mistake for the Democrats, and I certainly hope that they’ll continue to operate in good faith,” Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., and the chair of the Homeland Security spending panel, said.

    “Because you do realize, ICE and Customs and Border Patrol would continue to be funded,” she continued.

    SCHUMER, JEFFRIES MEND RIFT, PRESENT UNITED FRONT ON DHS REFORMS AS DEADLINE NEARS

    Things are also about to get complicated quickly in the upper chamber. Lawmakers are set to leave Washington, D.C., for a weeklong recess this Thursday, and many are headed overseas to the Munich Security Conference.

    That starts on the day of the deadline and lasts through the weekend. Thune warned that it was possible he would cancel the upcoming recess, especially if there was little progress toward avoiding a DHS shutdown.

    Still, Senate Democrats believe that the ball is in the GOP’s court and are waiting for their counterparts to act.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “I mean, I think they’re pretty reasonable,” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., and the top Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security Appropriations panel, said.

    “I mean, we did not ask for the moon,” he continued. “We asked for targeted but impactful changes in the way that ICE is terrorizing American cities. So obviously we’re willing to negotiate.”

    Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6388744851112

  • 为保障国家安全 乌克兰争取2027年加入欧盟


    2026年2月10日 17:17 / 联合早报

    Image 14: 知情者透露,欧盟正准备一系列方案,把乌克兰入盟安排纳入未来的和平协议中。 (示意图/Pixabay )

    知情者透露,欧盟正准备一系列方案,把乌克兰入盟安排纳入未来的和平协议中。这些方案包括提前为乌克兰提供欧盟成员资格所带来的保护,以及立即让它享有部分成员国权利。

    同时,欧盟将向乌克兰明确列出推进正式入盟程序所须采取的步骤和时间表,以便为乌克兰提供更明确的长期保障。

    欧盟委员会发言人向彭博社证实,基辅未来入盟的安排是和平协议讨论的一部分。欧盟目前已通过深化全面自贸协定等机制,加强与候选国的制度衔接。

    乌克兰此前与美国拟定一份20点和平计划草案提出,目标在2027年加入欧盟,并在过渡期获得部分成员权利。乌总统泽连斯基多次强调,欧盟成员资格是国家安全的重要保障。

    另一方面,俄罗斯外交部副部长格鲁什科说,解决俄乌冲突的任何和平协议,也必须考虑俄安全保障问题。尽管乌克兰的安全关切应被重视,但若忽视俄安全利益,协议将难以达成。

    他重申,俄方的核心要求包括禁止乌克兰加入北约、反对北约国家在乌部署部队,并停止利用乌领土对俄构成“安全威胁”。

    俄乌代表近期在美国斡旋下于阿联酋举行两轮会谈,下一轮会谈将在美国举行,日期未定。

    为保障国家安全 乌克兰争取2027年加入欧盟

    2026年2月10日 17:17 / 联合早报

    Image 14: 知情者透露,欧盟正准备一系列方案,把乌克兰入盟安排纳入未来的和平协议中。 (示意图/Pixabay )

    知情者透露,欧盟正准备一系列方案,把乌克兰入盟安排纳入未来的和平协议中。这些方案包括提前为乌克兰提供欧盟成员资格所带来的保护,以及立即让它享有部分成员国权利。

    同时,欧盟将向乌克兰明确列出推进正式入盟程序所须采取的步骤和时间表,以便为乌克兰提供更明确的长期保障。

    欧盟委员会发言人向彭博社证实,基辅未来入盟的安排是和平协议讨论的一部分。欧盟目前已通过深化全面自贸协定等机制,加强与候选国的制度衔接。

    乌克兰此前与美国拟定一份20点和平计划草案提出,目标在2027年加入欧盟,并在过渡期获得部分成员权利。乌总统泽连斯基多次强调,欧盟成员资格是国家安全的重要保障。

    另一方面,俄罗斯外交部副部长格鲁什科说,解决俄乌冲突的任何和平协议,也必须考虑俄安全保障问题。尽管乌克兰的安全关切应被重视,但若忽视俄安全利益,协议将难以达成。

    他重申,俄方的核心要求包括禁止乌克兰加入北约、反对北约国家在乌部署部队,并停止利用乌领土对俄构成“安全威胁”。

    俄乌代表近期在美国斡旋下于阿联酋举行两轮会谈,下一轮会谈将在美国举行,日期未定。

  • 为保障国家安全 乌克兰争取2027年加入欧盟


    2026年2月10日 17:17 / 联合早报

    (布鲁塞尔/莫斯科综合电)知情者透露,欧盟正准备一系列方案,把乌克兰入盟安排纳入未来的和平协议中。这些方案包括提前为乌克兰提供欧盟成员资格所带来的保护,以及立即让它享有部分成员国权利。

    同时,欧盟将向乌克兰明确列出推进正式入盟程序所须采取的步骤和时间表,以便为乌克兰提供更明确的长期保障。

    欧盟委员会发言人向彭博社证实,基辅未来入盟的安排是和平协议讨论的一部分。欧盟目前已通过深化全面自贸协定等机制,加强与候选国的制度衔接。

    乌克兰此前与美国拟定一份20点和平计划草案提出,目标在2027年加入欧盟,并在过渡期获得部分成员权利。乌总统泽连斯基多次强调,欧盟成员资格是国家安全的重要保障。

    另一方面,俄罗斯外交部副部长格鲁什科说,解决俄乌冲突的任何和平协议,也必须考虑俄安全保障问题。尽管乌克兰的安全关切应被重视,但若忽视俄安全利益,协议将难以达成。

    他重申,俄方的核心要求包括禁止乌克兰加入北约、反对北约国家在乌部署部队,并停止利用乌领土对俄构成“安全威胁”。

    俄乌代表近期在美国斡旋下于阿联酋举行两轮会谈,下一轮会谈将在美国举行,日期未定。

    为保障国家安全 乌克兰争取2027年加入欧盟

    2026年2月10日 17:17 / 联合早报

    (布鲁塞尔/莫斯科综合电)知情者透露,欧盟正准备一系列方案,把乌克兰入盟安排纳入未来的和平协议中。这些方案包括提前为乌克兰提供欧盟成员资格所带来的保护,以及立即让它享有部分成员国权利。

    同时,欧盟将向乌克兰明确列出推进正式入盟程序所须采取的步骤和时间表,以便为乌克兰提供更明确的长期保障。

    欧盟委员会发言人向彭博社证实,基辅未来入盟的安排是和平协议讨论的一部分。欧盟目前已通过深化全面自贸协定等机制,加强与候选国的制度衔接。

    乌克兰此前与美国拟定一份20点和平计划草案提出,目标在2027年加入欧盟,并在过渡期获得部分成员权利。乌总统泽连斯基多次强调,欧盟成员资格是国家安全的重要保障。

    另一方面,俄罗斯外交部副部长格鲁什科说,解决俄乌冲突的任何和平协议,也必须考虑俄安全保障问题。尽管乌克兰的安全关切应被重视,但若忽视俄安全利益,协议将难以达成。

    他重申,俄方的核心要求包括禁止乌克兰加入北约、反对北约国家在乌部署部队,并停止利用乌领土对俄构成“安全威胁”。

    俄乌代表近期在美国斡旋下于阿联酋举行两轮会谈,下一轮会谈将在美国举行,日期未定。

  • 日本大选中当选女性议员减少


    发布时间 / 来源:2026年2月10日 17:50 / 法新社

    作为日本首位女首相,高市早苗在星期天(2月8日)的大选中大获全胜,但她似乎并不热衷于将领导风格与性别议题联系起来。 (法新社)

    法新社报道,作为日本首位女首相,高市早苗在星期天的大选中大获全胜,但她似乎并不热衷于将自己的领导风格与性别议题联系起来。

    目前,女性议员仅占众议院议员总数的15%,在465个席位中赢得68席。这低于2024年选举的73席。

    星期天的选举中,女性候选人占比达到创纪录的24%,但这仅比2024年高出一个百分点。

    在日本,性别角色根深蒂固,女性通常被期望照顾家庭,即使她们工作也是如此。

    东海大学教授、政治学专家辻由希告诉法新社:“高市早苗就任首相似乎并没有促使自民党大幅增加女性候选人的数量。”

    在当选议员的68名女性中,有39名来自自民党,仅占该党315名议员总数的12%多一点。

    高市早苗是一位坚定的保守派,她反对修改已婚夫妇必须使用相同的姓氏的法律。

    东京大学政治学教授内山融说:“高市早苗以其保守立场而闻名,因此她不太可能将精力投入到诸如促进多元化、平等和包容等政策上。”

    在世界经济论坛发布的《2025年全球性别差距报告》中,日本在148个国家中排名第118位。

    日本大选中当选女性议员减少

    发布时间 / 来源:2026年2月10日 17:50 / 法新社

    作为日本首位女首相,高市早苗在星期天(2月8日)的大选中大获全胜,但她似乎并不热衷于将领导风格与性别议题联系起来。 (法新社)

    法新社报道,作为日本首位女首相,高市早苗在星期天的大选中大获全胜,但她似乎并不热衷于将自己的领导风格与性别议题联系起来。

    目前,女性议员仅占众议院议员总数的15%,在465个席位中赢得68席。这低于2024年选举的73席。

    星期天的选举中,女性候选人占比达到创纪录的24%,但这仅比2024年高出一个百分点。

    在日本,性别角色根深蒂固,女性通常被期望照顾家庭,即使她们工作也是如此。

    东海大学教授、政治学专家辻由希告诉法新社:“高市早苗就任首相似乎并没有促使自民党大幅增加女性候选人的数量。”

    在当选议员的68名女性中,有39名来自自民党,仅占该党315名议员总数的12%多一点。

    高市早苗是一位坚定的保守派,她反对修改已婚夫妇必须使用相同的姓氏的法律。

    东京大学政治学教授内山融说:“高市早苗以其保守立场而闻名,因此她不太可能将精力投入到诸如促进多元化、平等和包容等政策上。”

    在世界经济论坛发布的《2025年全球性别差距报告》中,日本在148个国家中排名第118位。

  • 泰国一男子因批评国王被判处50年刑期 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年2月10日 20:19

    泰国一家法院星期二(2月10日)将一名因批评泰国国王而被定罪的男子的刑期延长至50年。

    法新社报道,泰国人权律师协会在一份声明中表示,刑事法院根据该法判处普里迪功(Phuritikon Sarakul)30年监禁,罪名是他在2021年至2022年间在社交媒体上发表的帖子。

    该人权组织称,去年12月,这名43岁、居住在泰国境外的男子因在另一个帖子中犯有同样的罪行,在缺席的情况下被判处20年监禁。

    人权协会说,合并判刑的刑期总计达五十年,这意味着他被判处了“历史上根据第112条判处的最严厉的刑罚之一”。

    人权组织和批评人士指出,冒犯君主罪长期以来一直被用来压制异议和噤声政治对手。

    据人权组织统计,自2020年以来,至少有289人因违反该法而被起诉。

    最新裁决出炉于全国大选几天后,根据初步结果,保守的亲君主制政党泰自豪党意外获胜。

    此前,改革派的人民党的前身前进党曾以修改《冒犯君主法》为竞选纲领,参加2023年大选。但宪法法院在次年裁定,这项纲领等同于企图推翻君主立宪制,并解散了前进党。

    人民党在最近的竞选活动中没有再提及此事。该党在本次大选中位列第二。

    泰国一男子因批评国王被判处50年刑期 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年2月10日 20:19

    泰国一家法院星期二(2月10日)将一名因批评泰国国王而被定罪的男子的刑期延长至50年。

    法新社报道,泰国人权律师协会在一份声明中表示,刑事法院根据该法判处普里迪功(Phuritikon Sarakul)30年监禁,罪名是他在2021年至2022年间在社交媒体上发表的帖子。

    该人权组织称,去年12月,这名43岁、居住在泰国境外的男子因在另一个帖子中犯有同样的罪行,在缺席的情况下被判处20年监禁。

    人权协会说,合并判刑的刑期总计达五十年,这意味着他被判处了“历史上根据第112条判处的最严厉的刑罚之一”。

    人权组织和批评人士指出,冒犯君主罪长期以来一直被用来压制异议和噤声政治对手。

    据人权组织统计,自2020年以来,至少有289人因违反该法而被起诉。

    最新裁决出炉于全国大选几天后,根据初步结果,保守的亲君主制政党泰自豪党意外获胜。

    此前,改革派的人民党的前身前进党曾以修改《冒犯君主法》为竞选纲领,参加2023年大选。但宪法法院在次年裁定,这项纲领等同于企图推翻君主立宪制,并解散了前进党。

    人民党在最近的竞选活动中没有再提及此事。该党在本次大选中位列第二。

  • 日本大选中当选女性议员减少


    发布时间 / 来源:2026年2月10日 17:50 / 联合早报

    作为日本首位女首相,高市早苗在星期天(2月8日)的大选中大获全胜,但她似乎并不热衷于将领导风格与性别议题联系起来。 (法新社)

    法新社报道,作为日本首位女首相,高市早苗在星期天的大选中大获全胜,但她似乎并不热衷于将自己的领导风格与性别议题联系起来。

    目前,女性议员仅占众议院议员总数的15%,在465个席位中赢得68席。这低于2024年选举的73席。

    星期天的选举中,女性候选人占比达到创纪录的24%,但这仅比2024年高出一个百分点。

    在日本,性别角色根深蒂固,女性通常被期望照顾家庭,即使她们工作也是如此。

    东海大学教授、政治学专家辻由希告诉法新社:“高市早苗就任首相似乎并没有促使自民党大幅增加女性候选人的数量。”

    在当选议员的68名女性中,有39名来自自民党,仅占该党315名议员总数的12%多一点。

    高市早苗是一位坚定的保守派,她反对修改已婚夫妇必须使用相同的姓氏的法律。

    东京大学政治学教授内山融说:“高市早苗以其保守立场而闻名,因此她不太可能将精力投入到诸如促进多元化、平等和包容等政策上。”

    在世界经济论坛发布的《2025年全球性别差距报告》中,日本在148个国家中排名第118位。

    日本大选中当选女性议员减少

    发布时间 / 来源:2026年2月10日 17:50 / 联合早报

    作为日本首位女首相,高市早苗在星期天(2月8日)的大选中大获全胜,但她似乎并不热衷于将领导风格与性别议题联系起来。 (法新社)

    法新社报道,作为日本首位女首相,高市早苗在星期天的大选中大获全胜,但她似乎并不热衷于将自己的领导风格与性别议题联系起来。

    目前,女性议员仅占众议院议员总数的15%,在465个席位中赢得68席。这低于2024年选举的73席。

    星期天的选举中,女性候选人占比达到创纪录的24%,但这仅比2024年高出一个百分点。

    在日本,性别角色根深蒂固,女性通常被期望照顾家庭,即使她们工作也是如此。

    东海大学教授、政治学专家辻由希告诉法新社:“高市早苗就任首相似乎并没有促使自民党大幅增加女性候选人的数量。”

    在当选议员的68名女性中,有39名来自自民党,仅占该党315名议员总数的12%多一点。

    高市早苗是一位坚定的保守派,她反对修改已婚夫妇必须使用相同的姓氏的法律。

    东京大学政治学教授内山融说:“高市早苗以其保守立场而闻名,因此她不太可能将精力投入到诸如促进多元化、平等和包容等政策上。”

    在世界经济论坛发布的《2025年全球性别差距报告》中,日本在148个国家中排名第118位。

  • 法官在移民案件中定期以藐视法庭罪威胁司法部


    By Devan Cole,CNN | 发布于 2026 年 2 月 10 日,美国东部时间上午 5:00

    在明尼苏达州因唐纳德·特朗普总统的移民镇压行动引发的约 24 起案件中(通过 CNN 审查),由民主党和共和党任命的联邦法官不得不使用“藐视法庭”和“不遵守”等措辞,以唤起政府对法院命令的回应。

    截至目前,明尼苏达地区法院似乎尚未有任何法官因与“地铁行动”(Operation Metro Surge)相关的案件,对机构官员或司法部律师处以民事藐视法庭罪或施加制裁。但这种威胁的数量本身就意义重大。

    许多惩罚威胁源于法官认定一名移民被非法逮捕,必须立即获释的案件。其他合规问题则出现在美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)释放非公民时附加了某些此前未被逮捕时并不适用的条件,这激怒了未允许施加此类限制的法官。

    “这显然站不住脚,”乔·拜登前总统任命的法官劳拉·普罗维诺(Laura Provinzino)上月下旬对一名高级政府律师表示,“我不能继续让(联邦检察官)违反非常重要的命令……如果某人应该获释,就必须立即获释。”

    这些潜在的惩罚凸显了联邦司法系统与辩护特朗普政府行动的律师之间的紧张关系。联邦司法系统近几周处理了大量移民声称被非法拘留的案件,而这些律师往往对其机构客户的行动知之甚少,也无法充分跟上诉讼的步伐。

    通常情况下,法官会命令政府“说明理由”(show cause),即解释为何不应将律师或机构官员判为藐视法庭。但在某些情况下,代表卷入执法突袭的移民的律师在出现合规问题时,会请求法官施加制裁。

    “联邦政府官员在法庭上面临藐视法庭制裁的情况非常罕见,”美国公民自由联盟(ACLU)前法律主任、乔治城法学院教授大卫·科尔(David Cole)表示,“然而,在本届政府任内,这种情况几乎已成常态。”

    各种藐视法庭的威胁“是为了向政府施压,使其遵守法院命令,”科尔说,“一旦他们服从法院命令,制裁的目的就实现了。”

    事实上,尽管一些惩罚威胁仍悬在政府头上,但在一个个案件中,随着特朗普“地铁行动”前线的司法部律师纠正了法院指出的问题,问题最终都不了了之。

    司法部发言人娜塔莉·巴尔达萨雷(Natalie Baldassarre)在给 CNN 的声明中坚称政府“正在遵守法院命令”,并抨击明尼苏达州对政府行动提出异议的法官。

    “如果那些‘流氓法官’在审理案件时遵守法律,并尊重政府妥善准备案件的义务,就不会出现‘大量人身保护令案件’或对国土安全部(DHS)服从命令的担忧,”她说,“目前被拘留的非法外国人数量直接是本届政府加强边境安全政策以保障美国人民安全的结果。”

    “费力迫使机构纠正错误”

    上月,明尼苏达州移民在“地铁行动”中被逮捕后提起了 400 多起诉讼。CNN 审查了其中一部分,这些案件被该州联邦法院首席法官强调,他指责政府违反了近 100 项司法法令。

    “移民和海关执法局的不遵守程度几乎肯定被大大低估了,”法官帕特里克·施尔茨(Patrick Schiltz)在最近一份带有讽刺意味的命令中写道,其中列出了 74 起其同事认定存在违规的案件,“2026 年 1 月,ICE 违反的法院命令可能比某些联邦机构一生违反的还要多。”

    上周,负责管理政府不断增加的案件数量的律师朱莉·勒(Julie Le)在圣保罗对一名联邦法官大发雷霆,称要“费力地”让机构纠正某些案件中的错误。

    “修复一个系统,一个破碎的系统,我没有魔法按钮。我没有权力或声音去做到这一点,”勒说,“我只能在我拥有的能力和权限范围内行事。”

    拜登任命的美国联邦地区法官杰瑞·布莱克韦尔(Jerry Blackwell)将勒和她的一名同事传唤到法庭,要求他们解释为何不应因在少数案件中多次违反法院命令而被视为藐视法庭。

    “继续拘留不合法,仅仅因为遵守释放令在行政上有困难,或者因为一项行动超出了政府合法执行的能力,”布莱克韦尔对两名律师表示。

    布莱克韦尔没有当庭宣布裁决,勒随后已离开她 1 月初接手的明尼苏达临时职位。

    “民事部门没有足够资源处理此案”

    在 CNN 审查的案件中,法官们同样抨击了政府的合规问题,尽管他们尚未采取惩罚措施。

    比尔·克林顿前总统任命的法官约翰·R·通海姆(John R. Tunheim)上月下旬表示,在一名萨尔瓦多公民质疑其拘留合法性的案件中,政府“故意违反”了他的两项命令。

    在官员未能按通海姆的命令将该男子从他被拘留的另一个州带回举行保释听证会之后,法官指示政府将他飞往明尼苏达州,并在抵达后立即释放。

    直到 1 月 28 日,该男子才被带回明尼苏达州,比原定于 1 月 24 日抵达的时间晚了四天。但法官最终驳回了其律师要求认定政府藐视法庭并对其重复违规处以制裁的请求。

    “尽管(政府)故意违反了法院命令,”通海姆在简短的命令中写道,他表示感谢司法部的沟通和遵守努力,“因此,法院拒绝施加任何制裁。”

    在另一起案件中,一名法官在考虑可能的藐视法庭诉讼时,揭示了一名卷入移民镇压行动的墨西哥公民面临的严峻情况。

    法官多诺万·弗兰克(Donovan Frank)曾提出,如果移民官员不保证已遵守其释放该男子的命令,将可能出现藐视法庭的对峙。该男子被特工拘留后被送往当地医院,因危及生命的伤害而入院。据法官称,该男子受伤原因不明,医院记录显示他告诉工作人员“他被联邦特工拖拽和虐待”。

    1 月 23 日,克林顿任命的法官命令 ICE 特工解开该男子医院病床上的镣铐并离开设施——特工此前在那里试图继续拘留他。

    但四天过去了,政府没有更新,促使弗兰克在 1 月 28 日威胁官员,如果不保证该男子已获释,将提起藐视法庭诉讼。最终,政府告知法院已遵守命令,问题得到解决。

    与此同时,1 月 28 日在另一个法庭上,普罗维诺质问明尼阿波利斯联邦检察官办公室的一名高级官员,为何其办公室经常违反她的命令,并明确表示,如果再出现合规问题,该州最高联邦检察官需亲自出庭向她解释为何不应被视为藐视法庭。

    法官在表示她多次要求提供一名她下令释放的被拘留者信息却未得到回应后召开了听证会。该墨西哥公民在本应获释后 26 小时内仍被拘留。

    “我认为你恰好是办公室里第七个违反我的命令的人,”她对美国助理检察官弗里德里希·西克特(Friedrich Siekert)说,“你们正在采取哪些步骤,或者美国检察官办公室和 ICE 正在采取哪些步骤,以确保未来的合规?”

    西克特告诉法官,部分问题在于他的办公室根本没有足够的资源来处理移民突袭行动开始后提起的数百起案件。

    “民事部门目前没有足够的资源来处理这个问题,”他说。

    在法庭文件中被称为“胡安”的男子案件中,奥巴马前总统任命的法官苏珊·纳尔逊(Susan Nelson)指出,政府将他的释放期限逾期了五天。她说,如果最终仍不遵守,她将举行藐视法庭听证会,但在宣布计划后,该男子已获释,法官表示听证会“不再必要”。

    “大楼后燃烧的火焰”

    至少有一名负责明尼苏达州案件的特朗普任命法官也在其处理的案件中面临合规问题。埃里克·托斯特鲁德(Eric Tostrud)法官正在考虑墨西哥公民律师提出的补偿性制裁请求,他已提出在未来几周就该请求举行听证会的可能性。

    至于施尔茨,小布什前总统任命的法官上月传唤 ICE 负责人托德·莱昂斯(Todd Lyons),询问为何不应因他负责审理的案件中的命令违反而被视为藐视法庭。

    听证会举行前几天,一名移民被拘留者最终如法官命令般获释,施尔茨放弃了威胁。但法官明确表示,他并未完全取消藐视法庭的威胁。

    “法院警告 ICE,如果未来不遵守法院命令,可能会导致要求 Lyons 或其他政府官员亲自出庭的‘说明理由’命令,”施尔茨在 1 月 28 日的命令中写道。

    明尼阿波利斯的移民律师大卫·威尔逊(David Wilson)表示,施尔茨长达 4 页的对政府的猛烈抨击代表了“明显沮丧的司法系统的爆发点”。他的律师事务所处理了数百起“地铁行动”引发的案件,其中不乏合规问题。

    “显然,大楼后面有火焰在燃烧,”他说。

    https://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2026/02/09/anti-ice-protests-minnesota-orig.cnn/index.html
    https://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2026/02/08/school-superintendent-ice-stops-minnesota-orig.cnn/index.html
    https://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2026/02/07/5-year-old-ice-detention-orig.cnn/index.html

    Judges are regularly threatening contempt charges against the DOJ in immigration cases

    By Devan Cole, CNN | Published Feb 10, 2026, 5:00 AM ET

    In some two dozen cases stemming from President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown in Minnesota that CNN has reviewed, federal judges appointed to the bench by Democrats and Republicans have had to use terms like “contempt” and “noncompliance” to get the government’s attention to respond to court orders.

    To date, it doesn’t appear that any judge in the District of Minnesota has held an agency official or Justice Department attorney in civil contempt of court or imposed sanctions in cases related to Operation Metro Surge. But the sheer number of threats is significant.

    Many of the punishment threats have arisen in cases where judges concluded that an immigrant was unlawfully arrested and must immediately be released. Other compliance issues have bubbled up when Immigration and Customs Enforcement releases a noncitizen with certain conditions that they weren’t subject to prior to their arrest, enraging a judge who never gave permission to impose such constraints.

    “This is clearly not tenable,” Judge Laura Provinzino, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, told one top government attorney late last month. “I can’t continue to have (federal prosecutors) violating really important orders … If somebody should be released, that has to happen.”

    The potential punishments highlight the smoldering tension between the federal judiciary, which has had to handle scores of cases brought by immigrants claiming they were unlawfully detained in recent weeks, and the lawyers defending the Trump administration’s operation, who often have little insight into the actions of their agency clients or the ability to sufficiently keep up with the pace of litigation.

    Often, a judge is the one ordering the government to “show cause,” or explain, why the court should not hold lawyers or agency officials in contempt. But in some instances, attorneys representing immigrants swept up in the enforcement blitz have asked the judge to impose sanctions when compliance issues have occurred.

    “It’s very rare for federal government officials to face contempt sanctions in court,” said David Cole, a Georgetown Law professor who served as the legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union. “And yet, it’s become almost routine under this administration.”

    The various contempt threats are “about putting pressure on the government to comply with the court order,” Cole said. “Once they obey the court order, the purpose of those sanctions is over.”

    Indeed, though some of the punishment threats are still looming over the government, in case after case, the issue has fizzled out after DOJ attorneys on the frontlines of Trump’s Operation Metro Surge rectified problems identified by the court.

    Natalie Baldassarre, a Justice Department spokesperson, insisted in a statement to CNN that the administration “is complying with court orders” and attacked the judges taking issue with the government’s actions in Minnesota.

    “If rogue judges followed the law in adjudicating cases and respected the government’s obligation to properly prepare cases, there wouldn’t be an ‘overwhelming’ habeas caseload or concern over DHS following orders,” she said. “The level of illegal aliens currently detained is a direct result of this administration’s strong border security policies to keep the American people safe.”

    ‘Pulling teeth’ to get agencies to correct errors

    More than 400 cases were brought in Minnesota last month by immigrants who were arrested amid Operation Metro Surge. CNN reviewed a subset of them that were highlighted by the chief judge of the state’s federal court as he chided the administration for violating nearly 100 judicial edicts.

    “The extent of ICE’s noncompliance is almost certainly substantially understated,” Judge Patrick Schiltz recently wrote in a scornful order that included a list of 74 cases in which his colleagues on the bench had found violations. “ICE has likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence.”

    The problem was on full view last week when Julie Le, one of the attorneys managing the government’s ballooning caseload, unloaded on a federal judge in St. Paul about how it’s like “pulling teeth” to get agencies to correct errors made in some cases.

    “Fixing a system, a broken system, I don’t have a magic button to do it. I don’t have the power or the voice to do it,” Le said. “I only can do it within the ability and the capacity that I have.”

    US District Judge Jerry Blackwell, a Biden appointee, had hauled Le and one of her colleges into court to explain why they shouldn’t be held in contempt for repeated violations of court orders in a handful of cases.

    “Continued detention is not lawful just because compliance with release orders is administratively difficult or because an operation has expanded beyond the government’s capacity to execute it lawfully,” Blackwell told the two lawyers.

    Blackwell didn’t announce a decision from the bench, and Le has subsequently left her temporary post in Minnesota, which she took on in early January.

    ‘The civil division does not have the resources to handle this’

    In the cases reviewed by CNN, judges have similarly skewered the administration over its compliance problem, even as they’ve stopped short of imposing a punishment.

    Judge John R. Tunheim, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, said late last month that the government had “willfully violated” two of his orders in the case of a Salvadoran national who was challenging his detention.

    After officials failed to bring the man back from another state where he was being detained to have a bond hearing, as Tunheim ordered, the judge directed the government to instead fly him back to Minnesota and release him immediately upon his arrival.

    The man wasn’t returned to Minnesota until January 28, four days after he was supposed to land back in the state. But the judge ultimately rejected a request by his attorneys to find the government in contempt and impose sanctions against it for the repeated violations.

    “Although the (government) willfully violated the court’s orders,” Tunheim wrote in a brief order, he said he appreciated the communication from DOJ and its efforts to comply. “The court therefore declines to impose any sanctions.”

    In another case, a judge laid bare a dire situation facing a Mexican national caught up in the immigration crackdown as he moved toward potential contempt proceedings.

    Judge Donovan Frank had raised the possibility of a contempt showdown if immigration officials didn’t provide assurances that they had complied with his order to release the man, who had been detained by agents and subsequently brought to a local hospital with life-threatening injuries. The cause of the man’s injuries were unknown, according to the judge, who said that hospital records reflected that the man told its staff “he was dragged and mistreated by federal agents.”

    On January 23, the Clinton appointee ordered ICE agents to unshackle the man from his hospital bed and leave the facility, where they had been positioned in an apparent effort to keep him detained.

    But four full days passed without an update from the government, prompting Frank on January 28 to threaten officials with contempt proceedings if they didn’t provide assurances that the man had been released. The issue was ultimately diffused after the government told the court that it had complied with its order.

    Meanwhile, in a different courtroom on January 28, Provinzino grilled a high-ranking official in the federal prosecutor’s office in Minneapolis about why his office had regularly violated orders from her and made clear that if she saw any further compliance issues, the top federal prosecutor in the state would need to personally appear before her to explain why he shouldn’t be held in contempt.

    The judge had called the hearing after saying that repeated demands from her for information about a detainee she had ordered released went unanswered. The man, a Mexican national, had also remained in custody 26 hours after he was supposed to have been let out.

    “You would just happen to be, I think, the seventh one in the office who’s violated one of my orders,” she told Assistant US Attorney Friedrich Siekert. “What steps are you putting in place or is the United States Attorney’s Office and ICE putting in place to ensure compliance on a prospective basis?”

    Siekert told the judge that part of the issue was due to the fact that his office simply didn’t have the resources needed to manage the hundreds of cases brought since the immigration blitz began.

    “The civil division does not have the resources to handle this right now,” he said.

    And in the case of a man referred to in court papers as “Juan,” Judge Susan Nelson, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, noted that the government blew past her deadline for his release by five days. She said she would hold a contempt hearing if compliance wasn’t eventually achieved, but after those plans were announced, the man was released and the judge said the hearing was “no longer necessary.”

    ‘A fire burning behind the building’

    At least one of the Trump appointees overseeing cases in Minnesota is also grappling with compliance issues in the cases they’re handling. Judge Eric Tostrud is weighing a request from attorneys for a Mexican national for compensatory sanctions in his detention case. The judge has raised the possibility of holding a hearing over the request in the coming weeks.

    For Schiltz’s part, the appointee of former President George W. Bush had summoned the head of ICE, Todd Lyons, before him last month to explain why he shouldn’t be held in contempt for violations of orders in cases he’s overseeing.

    Days before the hearing was set to take place, Schiltz backed down from his threat after an immigrant detainee was finally released from custody, as the judge had ordered. But the judge made clear that he wasn’t completely lifting the contempt threat.

    “The court warns ICE that future noncompliance with court orders may result in future show-cause orders requiring the personal appearances of Lyons or other government officials,” Schiltz wrote in the January 28 order.

    David Wilson, an immigration attorney in Minneapolis whose firm has been handling hundreds of cases stemming from Operation Metro Surge, including many where compliance issues have arisen, said that Schiltz’s 4-page broadside against the government represented a “boiling point” for a visibly frustrated court system.

    “There’s clearly a fire burning behind the building,” he said.

    https://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2026/02/09/anti-ice-protests-minnesota-orig.cnn/index.html
    https://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2026/02/08/school-superintendent-ice-stops-minnesota-orig.cnn/index.html
    https://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2026/02/07/5-year-old-ice-detention-orig.cnn/index.html

  • 奥巴马医改注册人数下降,但具体程度数月内难明


    2026年2月10日 / 美国东部时间凌晨5:00 / KFF健康新闻

    在保费补贴大幅削减后,今年选择《平价医疗法案》(ACA)医保计划的美国人比预期更多,但随着医疗成本上升,他们是否会继续保有医保仍有待观察。

    这一切都源于2026年开放注册期风波不断的戏剧性事件。国会就拜登政府提供的更慷慨补贴是否延长展开辩论,导致史上最长政府停摆,并让公众将目光聚焦于不断上涨的医疗成本和可负担性问题。

    原补贴增强政策——通过降低家庭收入中用于医疗的比例并取消收入上限来扩大资格范围——已于去年年底到期。结果,几乎所有购买ACA医保的人成本都增加了。对一些人来说,尽管仍有较不慷慨的补贴,但其保费支出翻倍甚至更多。

    许多专家预计,2025年创纪录的2400万ACA注册人数今年会下降。

    罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会高级政策官员凯瑟琳·亨普斯特德表示:“如果你大幅提高某物的价格,经济学告诉我们,很多人会少买或根本不买。”

    以下是现在需要关注的问题:

    初步数据并非最终结果


    国会预算办公室(CBO)在2024年12月告诉议员,不延长增强型补贴将导致2026年220万人失去医保,后续年份人数将进一步增加。韦克利咨询集团分析师也估计,今年将有数百万美国人选择退出医保。

    联邦官员1月28日发布的数据显示,联邦医保市场(healthcare.gov)和各州运营的市场中,注册人数同比减少约120万。总体而言,共有2300万注册者,其中包括340万新加入ACA医保的人。

    去年同期,注册人数为2420万,其中390万是新注册者。

    但情况不止这些初步数据那么简单。

    一方面,两年的数据均以联邦市场1月15日(当天结束开放注册期)为统计节点。然而,自行运营市场的州的数据大多仅统计到1月10日或11日,尽管有些州的开放注册期延长至月底。因此,这些数字未能反映最后几天可能发生的情况:各州注册是否激增?或者市场是否出现更多取消覆盖的情况?

    此外,这些初步数据混合了新注册的ACA用户和现有客户,其中许多人是自动续期至2026年——这引发了其他问题。

    对于现有续期投保人,实际数据数周或数月后才能知晓,即确定有多少人实际支付保费。一些消费者可能未关注续期成本,或寄望国会延长补贴。

    这是一个需要牢记的重要因素,因为CBO和韦克利对数百万人失去医保的估计是基于全年覆盖的预测,而非初始注册数据。

    爱达荷州医保交易所(Your Health Idaho)执行董事帕特·凯利在1月22日记者会上表示:“未来几周,消费者可能发现实在负担不起保费而取消计划,保险公司也可能因未付款而取消覆盖。”

    各州注册模式差异显著


    另外19个自行运营交易所的州(及哥伦比亚特区)也出现变化,其中一些州公布了比联邦市场更详细的注册数据。

    联邦数据显示,大多数州2026年注册人数低于上一年,北卡罗来纳州降幅最大,达近22%。

    少数州——包括新墨西哥州、德克萨斯州、加利福尼亚州、马里兰州及哥伦比亚特区——ACA计划选择人数有所增加。

    新墨西哥州增幅最大,初始注册人数同比增加近14%。其他州和华盛顿特区的增幅均为个位数。

    新墨西哥州尤为独特,它用本州税收全额抵消所有消费者失去更慷慨联邦税收补贴的影响。其他几个州,包括加利福尼亚州、科罗拉多州、马里兰州和华盛顿州,也用州资金帮助部分注册者。

    由国家卫生政策学院支持的22个州市场组成的“州市场网络”表示,初步注册数据令人担忧。与去年同期相比,科罗拉多州计划取消率上升83%,爱达荷州取消率是去年的四倍,弗吉尼亚州取消率翻倍。

    加州数据显示,新注册人数同比下降32%。宾夕法尼亚州数据显示,55-64岁(保费最高的群体)和26-34岁年轻人终止覆盖的人数比其他年龄组更多。

    宾夕法尼亚州医保交易所管理局执行董事德文·特罗利表示:“我们看到大幅更高比例的人放弃医保。过去两个月,从早期退休人员到小企业主再到农民,约有7万人因无法维持生计而退出。”

    2月9日,宾夕法尼亚州公布最终数据,显示注册人数同比下降约2%,但这一数字掩盖了部分影响。该州称,近18%的注册者完全退出医保,老年人和农村居民最有可能离开。

    一些共和党人将此归咎于特朗普政府支持的反欺诈措施(包括一系列监管和立法变化),认为此举收紧了系统。尽管其中一些措施被联邦法院暂停未生效,但这些ACA批评者(部分人做出数百万非法注册的争议估计)称,这是注册人数下降的原因。他们此前曾指责更慷慨的补贴导致非法注册或经纪人因佣金怂恿计划转换。

    然而,自行运营ACA市场的州报告称此类非法转换很少或没有。与联邦市场相比,州级ACA平台采取了额外保障措施,防止经纪人未经授权获取消费者医保信息。

    哥伦比亚特区医保交易所管理局执行董事米拉·科夫曼表示,未返回市场的消费者主要原因是成本。

    科夫曼称:“分析未返回市场的人群,一半是小企业主。他们不是欺诈者。”

    保费更低,免赔额更高


    许多州的现有客户没有选择自动续期,而是大幅转向价格更低的“铜级”计划——这类计划免赔额比银级、金级和铂级计划更高。

    州市场网络报告,加州73%的续保成员转向铜级计划,高于去年同期的27%。缅因州铜级计划注册人数现已占所有购买计划的近60%。

    乔治城大学健康保险改革中心高级研究员斯泰西·波格表示:“人们在看月度预算能承受什么,寻找更低保费的计划。有些人可能希望不用达到免赔额。”

    平均而言,铜级计划年免赔额为7500美元。所有ACA计划均需无自付额或免赔额覆盖某些预防性服务(如疫苗接种、癌症筛查和其他检查),但其他服务需先满足年度免赔额。

    亨普斯特德表示,高免赔额可能导致一些患者避免就医。

    “人们害怕使用医疗服务,可能拖延治疗直到病情加重。”

    她补充说,医院和医生等医疗提供者正准备应对更多负担不起免赔额的投保患者。

    “所有人都预计医院将提供更多慈善医疗,这将损害其利润,可能导致裁员、关闭或减少服务。”

    联系KFF健康新闻:您是否难以负担医保?是否决定放弃覆盖?点击这里联系KFF健康新闻并分享您的故事。

    KFF健康新闻是一个全国性新闻机构,深入报道健康问题,是KFF(健康政策研究、民调及新闻的独立信源)的核心项目之一。

    Obamacare sign-ups drop, but the extent won’t be clear for months

    February 10, 2026 / 5:00 AM EST / KFF Health News

    More Americans than expected enrolled in Affordable Care Act health insurance plans for this year, after premium subsidies were dramatically cut — but it remains to be seen whether they’ll keep the coverage as their costs mount.

    It’s all part of a drama that roiled the ACA’s 2026 open enrollment period. Congressional debate over whether to extend more generous subsidies made available under the Biden administration led to the longest-ever government shutdown and focused public attention on rising health care costs and the affordability issue.

    The enhanced subsidies, which expanded eligibility both by lowering the percentage of household income people had to pay toward their care and removing an income cap, expired at the end of last year. As a result, just about everyone buying ACA coverage saw their costs increase. For some, what they paid toward premiums doubled or more, even though less generous subsidies remain in place.

    Many experts expected ACA enrollment, which hit a record 24 million in 2025, to fall this time around.

    “If you raise the price of something a whole lot, economics tell us that a lot of people will buy less of it or not buy at all,” said Katherine Hempstead, a senior policy officer with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

    Here are things to watch now:

    Initial numbers aren’t final


    The Congressional Budget Office told lawmakers in December 2024 that not extending the enhanced subsidies would cause 2.2 million people to lose insurance in 2026, with further increases in following years. Analysts with the Wakely Consulting Group also estimated that millions would opt out of insurance for this year.

    Data released Jan. 28 by federal officials showed a year-over-year drop of about 1.2 million enrollments across the federal healthcare.gov marketplace and those run by states. Overall, there were 23 million enrollees, including 3.4 million new to ACA coverage.

    At about the same time last year, there were 24.2 million sign-ups, with 3.9 million new to the marketplaces.

    But there’s more to it than those initial numbers.

    For one thing, both years’ data was pegged to Jan. 15 for the federal marketplace, which closed its open enrollment period that day. But, the data for the states that run their own marketplaces included sign-ups in most cases only through Jan. 10 or 11, even though some held open enrollment until the end of the month. Thus, the numbers don’t reflect what might have happened in those last days. Was there a surge in state sign-ups? Or, conversely, did the marketplaces see more enrollees cancel their coverage?

    Additionally, those initial numbers are a mix of newly minted ACA enrollees and existing customers, many of whom were auto-reenrolled for 2026 — which raises other issues.

    For existing, reenrolled policyholders, the real figures won’t be known for weeks or months, when it becomes clear how many actually pay their premiums. Some consumers may not have focused on their reenrollment costs or may have hoped Congress would extend the subsidies.

    That’s an important factor to keep in mind because the CBO and Wakely estimates of millions losing insurance were based on projections for full-year coverage, not initial sign-ups.

    In the coming weeks, “consumers may find they really can’t afford the premiums and cancel their plans, while carriers may also cancel coverage for nonpayment,” said Pat Kelly, executive director of Your Health Idaho, a state-based ACA marketplace, during a Jan. 22 call with reporters.

    Sharp differences in state enrollment patterns


    Changes are also afoot in the 19 other states (and the District of Columbia) that run their own exchanges, some of which have issued more detailed data about enrollment than the federal marketplace.

    Most states saw lower enrollment for 2026 than the prior year, with the biggest drop in North Carolina, where sign-ups fell by nearly 22%, federal data shows.

    In a few states — including New Mexico, Texas, California, and Maryland, as well as the District of Columbia — the number of people selecting ACA plans increased.

    The jump was largest in New Mexico, with its initial number of people selecting plans up by nearly 14%. Increases were in the single digits in the other states and Washington, D.C.

    New Mexico — uniquely — used its own tax dollars to fully offset the loss of the more generous federal tax subsidies for all consumers. A few other states, including California, Colorado, Maryland, and Washington, used state money to help some enrollees.

    The State Marketplace Network, a collective of 22 state marketplaces supported by the National Academy for State Health Policy, said initial enrollment figures raise concern. Compared with the same time last year, outright plan cancellations are up 83% in Colorado, disenrollments are four times what they were in Idaho, and Virginia has seen cancellations double.

    New enrollments are down 32% in California from the same period last year, according to data from the state. In Pennsylvania, people ages 55 to 64, the group with the highest premiums, and young people 26 to 34 are terminating their coverage in higher numbers than other age groups, state data shows.

    “We have drastically higher rates of people dropping their coverage,” said Devon Trolley, executive director of the Pennsylvania Health Insurance Exchange Authority. “We had 70,000 drop in the last two months, from early retirees to small-business owners to farmers not knowing how to make ends meet.”

    On Feb. 9, Pennsylvania released final numbers, showing enrollment dropped by about 2% from last year, although that figure masks some of the effects. The state says nearly 18% of enrollees dropped coverage altogether, with older and rural residents being the most likely to fall out.

    Some Republicans credited Trump-administration-backed anti-fraud measures, which included a range of regulatory and legislative changes, for tightening the system. Although some of those actions were paused by a federal court and have not taken effect, those ACA critics, some of whom have produced controversial estimates that millions may have been improperly enrolled, say that’s behind the decline. They have previously blamed the more generous subsidies for unauthorized enrollments or ACA plan-switching by commission-seeking brokers.

    States that run their own ACA marketplaces, however, reported little or no such unauthorized switching. Relative to the federal marketplace, the state-based ACA platforms employ additional safeguards to prevent brokers from accessing consumers’ coverage without authorization.

    Among consumers not returning to the marketplace, the main reason is cost, said Mila Kofman, executive director of the DC Health Benefit Exchange Authority, which runs the district’s ACA marketplace.

    “When we looked at who these folks are, half are small-business owners,” Kofman said. “They are not folks committing fraud.”

    Lower premiums, higher deductibles


    Rather than sticking with automatic reenrollment, existing customers in many states shifted sharply into lower-priced “bronze” plans that come with higher deductibles than silver, gold, and platinum plans.

    California saw 73% of renewing members who switched plans move to a bronze plan, up from 27% at the same time last year, the State Marketplace Network reported. In Maine, bronze enrollment now represents almost 60% of all plans purchased.

    People are “looking at what works in their monthly budget, looking for that lower premium,” said Stacey Pogue, a senior research fellow at the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University. “Some might be crossing their fingers that they won’t need to meet their deductible.”

    On average, bronze plans have an annual deductible of $7,500. All ACA plans are required to cover certain preventive services — such as some vaccinations, cancer screenings, and other tests — without a copayment or deductible, but most everything else is covered only after an annual deductible is met.

    High deductibles can lead some patients to avoid seeking medical care, Hempstead said.

    “People are terrified to use their care,” she said. “They may delay something until it’s more serious.”

    She added that medical providers, including hospitals and doctors, are bracing for an increase in the number of insured patients who can’t afford to pay their deductibles.

    “Everyone is anticipating that hospitals will have to give out more charity care, which will hurt their bottom lines and might lead them to have to lay off people or close or reduce services,” she said.

    Connect with KFF Health News: Are you struggling to afford health insurance? Have you decided to forgo coverage?Click hereto contact KFF Health News and share your story.

    KFF Health Newsis a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs atKFF— the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.