博客

  • 新闻


    输入数据格式错误,无法解析为JSON

    No English content available

  • 新闻


    输入数据格式错误,无法解析为JSON

    No English content available

  • 新闻


    输入数据格式错误,无法解析为JSON

    No English content available

  • 新闻


    输入数据格式错误,无法解析为JSON

    No English content available

  • 新闻


    输入数据格式错误,无法解析为JSON

    No English content available

  • 新闻


    输入数据格式错误,无法解析为JSON

    No English content available

  • 新闻


    输入数据格式错误,无法解析为JSON

    No English content available

  • 新闻


    输入数据格式错误,无法解析为JSON

    US proposes boosting ‘Buy America’ requirements for government-funded EV charging stations

    February 10, 2026 4:10 PM UTC / Reuters

    By David Shepardson

    节点运行失败

    United States Department of Transportation logo and U.S. flag are seen in this illustration taken April 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Companies
    • EVgo Inc Follow
    • General Motors Co Follow
    • Precept Business Services, Inc. Follow

    Show more companies

    WASHINGTON, Feb 10 (Reuters) – The U.S. Transportation Department said on Tuesday it is proposing to boost American content in federally funded electric vehicle charging stations from 55% to up to 100% and require them to be produced in the United States, which could pose significant hurdles to the use of the funds.

    The Biden administration in 2023 agreed to waive some “Buy America” requirements for government-funded electric vehicle charging stations for the $5 billion program to fund the stations.

    Stay up to date with the latest news, trends and innovations that are driving the global automotive industry with the Reuters Auto File newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    The proposal – first reported by Reuters – would take immediate effect once the changes are finalized. USDOT said it believes manufacturers have the capacity to produce EV chargers in U.S. facilities, which will “protect Americans from foreign-made EV charger components that use technology with cybersecurity vulnerabilities.”

    Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the increase in content requirements will “strengthen domestic manufacturing, generate new American jobs, make U.S. businesses more competitive, and address potential national security concerns.”

    During the Biden administration, USDOT’s Federal Highway Administration waived U.S. content requirements for steel, iron and construction materials for EV charging stations, which some Republicans said would result in U.S. taxpayers subsidizing Chinese-made products.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    JUDGE RULED AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

    Last month, U.S. District Judge Tana Lin ruled President Donald Trump’s administration unlawfully suspended funding awarded to support the expansion of electric vehicle charger infrastructure, in a victory for 20 Democratic-led states that sued over the action.

    The states sued USDOT after it suspended in February an EV charger infrastructure program enacted by Congress in 2021 under Democratic President Joe Biden.

    Duffy said USDOT has updated EV charging guidance and made it easier for states to build chargers, resulting in nearly double the number of charging ports completed during the Biden administration. “If Congress wants to see these chargers built, we put America First,” Duffy said.

    Soon after Duffy took office, USDOT suspended the $5 billion National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, which was part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that Biden signed into law in 2021.

    The Trump administration has pursued policies to boost the sale of gas-powered vehicles and cut EV incentives for automakers and consumers.

    A funding bill approved in January by Congress redirected $879 million in funds approved under Biden for the EV charging network to other infrastructure priorities.

    Reporting by David Shepardson Editing by Rod Nickel

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 前美国众议员马林诺夫斯基在新泽西州初选中向进步派挑战者认输


    By Nolan D. McCaskill
    2026年2月10日 下午5:47 UTC 更新于1小时前

    Former Representative Tom Malinowski, a Democrat from New Jersey, speaks during a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing, on Capitol Hill, in Washington D.C., U.S., September 16, 2020. Stefani Reynolds/Pool via REUTERS Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Companies
    • Analilia Mejia在拥挤的新泽西州竞选中领跑民主党初选
    • Mejia将在4月特别选举中对阵乔·哈塔韦
    • 民主党人旨在缩小共和党在美国众议院的多数优势

    华盛顿,2月10日(路透社) – 前美国众议员汤姆·马林诺夫斯基(Tom Malinowski)周二上午在电话中向安娜利娅·梅希亚(Analilia Mejia)祝贺其赢得民主党提名,承认这场自周四选举以来一直胶着的竞选。

    根据周二上午最新计票结果,梅希亚以近900票的优势领先马林诺夫斯基。梅希亚曾是美国参议员伯尼·桑德斯(Bernie Sanders)2020年总统竞选的全国政治主任。

    路透社《内部动态》通讯是您了解全球体育界重大事件的必备指南。点击此处注册

    新泽西州北部选民选择梅希亚作为民主党候选人,以填补美国众议院的一个空缺席位,这使她成为两个月内当选国会议员的热门人选。

    梅希亚作为进步派“局外人”参加竞选,在新泽西州第11选区的10名民主党候选人中脱颖而出,以微弱优势击败马林诺夫斯基。该席位此前由温和派民主党人米基·谢里尔(Mikie Sherrill)担任,她在11月当选州长后退出了众议院。

    梅希亚将在4月16日的特别选举中对阵兰道夫镇委员会成员乔·哈塔韦(Joe Hathaway),后者在共和党初选中无人反对。两人将角逐谢里尔剩余任期至2027年初的席位。

    马林诺夫斯基表示:“向华盛顿派出一名民主党人填补这一席位至关重要,而非(唐纳德)特朗普的橡皮图章。安娜利娅在竞选活动中展现出的积极态度以及在选举日激励众多选民的表现,值得我们明确赞扬和肯定。”

    民主党候选人被看好能赢得该选区,前副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯(Kamala Harris)在2024年总统选举中以近9个百分点的优势赢得该选区。

    众议院共和党人以218-214的多数席位领先,这意味着在民主党统一反对的情况下,他们仅能以一票之差通过立法。

    新泽西州的民主党胜选将进一步缩小共和党多数优势。然而,共和党人被看好在3月10日佐治亚州和8月4日加利福尼亚州的两场特别选举中赢得两个空缺席位,从而将多数优势扩大两个席位。

    进步派支持梅希亚;外部团体针对马林诺夫斯基


    梅希亚获得了国会山多位进步派领袖的支持,包括桑德斯、参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦(Elizabeth Warren)和众议员亚历山德里娅·奥卡西奥-科尔特斯(Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)。

    一个支持以色列的超级政治行动委员会(super PAC)花费230万美元反对马林诺夫斯基,后者表示不排除对以色列的外援附加条件。

    其他主要候选人包括前副州长塔赫莎·韦(Tahesha Way)和埃塞克斯县专员布伦丹·吉尔(Brendan Gill)。

    如果梅希亚在4月当选,她将再次出现在6月的州初选选票上,以角逐民主党在大选中的全两年任期提名。

    曾针对马林诺夫斯基的支持以色列超级政治行动委员会“联合民主党”上周表示,这场竞选结果“是预期中的可能性”,并暗示将在6月投入更多资金击败梅希亚。

    该组织在一份声明中称:“我们的重点仍然是选出谁将在下一个完整任期内服务国会。”

    11月的中期选举将决定特朗普任期最后两年中,哪个政党控制众议院和参议院。

    By Nolan D. McCaskill in Washington; Additional reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Cynthia Osterman and Matthew Lewis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

    • Suggested Topics:
    • United States

    Former US Representative Malinowski concedes to progressive challenger in New Jersey primary

    By Nolan D. McCaskill
    February 10, 2026 5:47 PM UTC Updated 1 hour ago

    节点运行失败

    Former Representative Tom Malinowski, a Democrat from New Jersey, speaks during a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing, on Capitol Hill, in Washington D.C., U.S., September 16, 2020. Stefani Reynolds/Pool via REUTERS Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Companies
    • Analilia Mejia leads Democratic primary in crowded New Jersey race
    • Mejia to face Joe Hathaway in April special election
    • Democrats aim to narrow Republican US House majority

    WASHINGTON, Feb 10 (Reuters) – Former U.S. Representative Tom Malinowski congratulated Analilia Mejia for winning the Democratic nomination in a phone call on Tuesday morning, conceding a race that has been too close to call since Thursday’s election.

    Mejia, national political director of U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders’ 2020 presidential campaign, leads Malinowski by nearly 900 votes in Tuesday morning’s latest tally.

    The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

    Voters in northern New Jersey chose Mejia as the Democratic nominee to fill a vacant seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, making her the favorite to be elected to Congress in two months.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Mejia, who ran as a progressive outsider, prevailed over 10 other Democrats in the crowded field in New Jersey’s 11th District, finishing narrowly ahead of Malinowski. The seat was previously held by Mikie Sherrill, a moderate Democrat who left the House after she was elected governor in November.

    Mejia will face Randolph Township Councilman Joe Hathaway, who ran unopposed for the Republican nomination, in the April 16 special election to serve the remainder of Sherrill’s term through early 2027.

    “It is essential that we send a Democrat to Washington to fill this seat, not a rubber stamp for (President Donald) Trump,” Malinowski said. “Analilia deserves unequivocal praise and credit for running a positive campaign and for inspiring so many voters on Election Day.”

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    The Democratic candidate is favored to win the district, which former Vice President Kamala Harris carried in the 2024 presidential election by nearly 9 points.

    House Republicans hold a 218-214 majority, which means they can spare only one vote to pass legislation over united Democratic opposition.

    A Democratic victory in New Jersey would give Republicans an even narrower margin. However, Republicans are favored to fill two vacant seats in special elections in Georgia on March 10 and California on August 4, which would expand their majority by two seats.

    PROGRESSIVES BACKED MEJIA; OUTSIDE GROUP TARGETED MALINOWSKI


    Mejia earned the backing of leading progressives on Capitol Hill, including Sanders, Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

    A pro-Israel super PAC spent $2.3 million opposing Malinowski, who said he would not rule out placing conditions on foreign aid to Israel.

    Other top candidates included former Lieutenant Governor Tahesha Way and Essex County Commissioner Brendan Gill.

    If Mejia is elected in April, she will be on the ballot again for the state’s June 2 primary to be the Democratic nominee in the general election for a full two-year term.

    United Democracy Project, the pro-Israel super PAC that targeted Malinowski, said last week that the race’s outcome “was an anticipated possibility” and signaled it would spend more money to defeat Mejia in June.

    “Our focus remains on who will serve the next full term in Congress,” the group said in a statement.

    November’s midterm elections will determine which party controls the House and Senate for the final two years of Trump’s term.

    Reporting by Nolan D. McCaskill in Washington; Additional reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Cynthia Osterman and Matthew Lewis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

    • Suggested Topics:
    • United States
  • 民主党人在紧张听证会上质问特朗普政府官员的移民执法策略


    2026年2月10日 下午3:22 UTC / 路透社 / 泰德·赫森报道

    • 摘要
    • 官员因明尼苏达州 killings 和移民执法面临审查
    • 民主党人批评特朗普激进移民政策并呼吁诺姆辞职
    • 移民和海关执法局(ICE)在公众反对声中为执法辩护,移民机构获得更多资金

    华盛顿,2月10日(路透社) – 美国国会民主党人周二就共和党总统唐纳德·特朗普的镇压行动向其顶级移民官员施压,这是自两名美国公民在明尼苏达州被杀害、对特朗普大规模驱逐行动的反对声日益高涨以来的首次此类听证会。

    这些官员是负责移民执法和合法移民的三个机构的最高级别官员,在明尼阿波利斯的蕾妮·古德(Renee Good)和亚历克斯·普雷蒂(Alex Pretti)遇害后,他们在委员会中遭到民主党人的反复批评。

    [每日法讯]新闻通讯将最新法律新闻直接发送到您的收件箱,助您开启充满法律资讯的一天。立即在此注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    特朗普1月在明尼阿波利斯升级了其激进的移民执法行动,导致戴面具的移民官员与反对大规模移民扫荡的居民发生冲突。这些扫荡行动已逮捕了许多无犯罪记录的人,包括家庭和儿童。特朗普的高级官员在古德和普雷蒂被联邦移民官员杀害后迅速将他们描述为“国内恐怖分子”和袭击者,但视频证据与此说法相矛盾。

    这起杀人事件的余波成为民主党人在数月来移民执法力度不断加大后的转折点,导致他们在1月搁置了美国国土安全部的资金,同意了一项周五到期的短期资金延期。

    民主党人表示,ICE必须改革,并要求他们摘下口罩、佩戴随身摄像机,并优先执法以关注刑事犯罪分子。

    美国众议院国土安全委员会主席、共和党人安德鲁·加巴里诺(Andrew Garbarino)在开场陈述中呼吁对明尼苏达州两名美国公民的被杀事件进行全面调查,这与指责古德和普雷蒂的特朗普官员的立场截然不同。

    “必须进行全面公正的调查,”代表纽约长岛某选区的加巴里诺说。“我期望在调查进行期间,每位证人都能向委员会充分通报情况……在调查进行期间,官员和民选领导人不能仓促下结论。”

    委员会的最高民主党人本尼·汤普森(Bennie Thompson)严厉批评了特朗普政府在城市中的激进执法,并重申了要求国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆(Kristi Noem)辞职的呼吁。

    两党在“废除ICE”呼吁上的冲突

    周二作证的有美国移民和海关执法局代理局长托德·莱昂斯(Todd Lyons)、美国海关和边境保护局局长罗德尼·斯科特(Rodney Scott)以及美国公民及移民服务局局长乔·埃洛(Joe Edlow)。

    这三位特朗普政府官员在开场陈述中为总统的移民议程辩护,强调了对ICE官员的威胁、特朗普政府下边境安全的加强以及对合法移民更严格的审查。

    莱昂斯表示,尽管面临公众反对和袭击风险,ICE官员将继续执行特朗普的驱逐行动。

    “尽管存在这些危险,我们的官员仍以坚定的决心执行任务。我们才刚刚开始,”他说。“ICE仍然致力于这一基本原则:非法进入我国的人必须被追究责任。”

    2025年由共和党控制的国会通过的一项支出法案将1700亿美元历史性地投入移民执法机构,截至2029年9月,这比ICE和边境巡逻队现有的约190亿美元年度预算大幅增加。

    一些民主党人支持“废除ICE”的呼声,而共和党人则表示这将是鲁莽的,并强调在民主党前总统乔·拜登任内非法移民水平很高。

    “似乎国会一侧支持开放边境并希望废除ICE,”德克萨斯州共和党议员奥古斯特·普夫卢格(August Pfluger)说。“我希望这一点能被证明是错误的,而国会另一侧希望执行现行法律。”

    美国公民卷入移民镇压行动

    代表加利福尼亚州阿纳海姆所在选区的民主党众议员路易斯·科雷亚(Lou Correa)向莱昂斯询问ICE是否维护美国公民数据库。

    科雷亚援引了缅因州一名戴面具的联邦移民官员的视频,该官员称他会把对手的名字放入一个“漂亮的小数据库”,而这个人现在“被视为国内恐怖分子”。路透社周二援引两名ICE官员的话报道称,ICE官员数月来一直在内部数据库中追踪抗议者的名字。

    莱昂斯否认其机构在数据库中追踪反ICE抗议者。

    “我可以向你保证,没有任何数据库在追踪美国公民,”他说。

    国土安全部回应路透社称,它不维护美国“国内恐怖分子”数据库,但会追踪威胁。

    罗德岛州民主党众议员塞思·马加齐纳(Seth Magaziner)播放了一段边境特工去年近距离向芝加哥一名父亲和他1岁的女儿的汽车窗口喷洒化学刺激物的视频。

    “这是一个美国公民家庭,他们当时正在芝加哥的一家山姆会员店购物,”马加齐纳对美国最高边境官员斯科特说。“将胡椒喷雾对准移动车辆的窗户是否是正确的程序?”

    “我没有所有细节;这是正在进行的调查,”斯科特说。“但回答你的问题,我们尽量避免这种情况……不,这不是正确的程序。”

    尽管ICE内部指南要求官员停止与抗议者互动,但此类遭遇仍在继续,包括美国公民因驾车跟随官员而被捕并被指控。

    报道:泰德·赫森;编辑:野山千津(Chizu Nomiyama)、罗德·尼科尔(Rod Nickel)

    我们的标准:路透社信托原则。

    Democrats press Trump officials on immigration enforcement tactics in tense hearing

    February 10, 2026 3:22 PM UTC / Reuters / By Ted Hesson

    • Summary
    • Officials face scrutiny over Minnesota killings and immigration enforcement
    • Democrats criticize Trump’s aggressive immigration policies and call for Noem’s resignation
    • ICE defends enforcement amid public opposition and increased funding for immigration agencies

    WASHINGTON, Feb 10 (Reuters) – Democrats in the U.S. Congress pressed President Donald Trump’s top immigration officials on Tuesday over the Republican president’s crackdown, the first such hearing since two U.S. citizens were killed in Minnesota amid mounting opposition to Trump’s mass deportation push.

    The officials – the highest-ranking at three agencies overseeing immigration enforcement and legal immigration – faced repeated criticism from Democrats on the committee after the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Trump escalated his aggressive immigration enforcement push in Minneapolis in January, leading to clashes between masked immigration officers and residents opposed to broad immigration sweeps that have picked up many people with no criminal record, including families and children. Top Trump officials swiftly portrayed Good and Pretti as “domestic terrorists” and aggressors after they were killed by federal immigration officers, but video evidence contradicted those statements.

    The fallout over the killing became a tipping point for Democrats after months of intensifying immigration enforcement and led them to hold up funding for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in January, agreeing to a short-term funding extension that expires on Friday.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Democrats say ICE must be reformed and have demanded they remove masks, wear body cameras and prioritize enforcement to focus on criminal offenders.

    U.S. House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee Chairman Andrew Garbarino, a Republican, called for a full investigation into the killings of the two U.S. citizens in Minnesota in opening remarks, a departure from Trump officials who blamed Good and Pretti.

    “There must be a complete and impartial investigation,” said Garbarino, who represents a district on Long Island in New York. “I expect each of our witnesses to keep this committee fully informed as the investigations run their course … While these investigations are ongoing, officials and elected leaders cannot rush to judgment.”

    The top Democrat on the committee, Bennie Thompson, sharply criticized the Trump administration’s aggressive enforcement in U.S. cities and reiterated a call for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign.

    PARTISAN CLASHES OVER ‘ABOLISH ICE’ CALLS

    Testifying on Tuesday were Todd Lyons, acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Rodney Scott, commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Joe Edlow, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

    The three Trump officials in opening remarks defended the president’s immigration agenda, highlighting threats to ICE officers, increased border security under Trump, and more intense vetting of legal immigrants.

    Lyons said ICE officers would continue implementing Trump’s deportation push even as officers faced the risk of assault amid public opposition.

    “Despite these perils, our officers continue to execute their mission with unwavering resolve. And we are only getting started,” he said. “ICE remains committed to the fundamental principle that those who illegally enter our country must be held accountable.”

    A spending package passed by the Republican-controlled Congress in 2025 devoted a historic $170 billion to immigration enforcement agencies through September 2029, a huge surge of funding over ICE and Border Patrol’s existing annual budgets of about $19 billion.

    Some Democrats embraced calls to “Abolish ICE,” while Republicans said that would be reckless and stressed the high levels of illegal immigration under Democratic former President Joe Biden.

    “It seems like one side of the aisle is in favor of open borders and wants to abolish ICE,” said Republican U.S. Representative August Pfluger of Texas. “I hope that that can be proven wrong, and the other side of the aisle wants to enforce the laws that are on the books.”

    IMMIGRATION CRACKDOWN SWEEPS IN U.S. CITIZENS

    Democratic U.S. Representative Lou Correa, who represents a district that includes Anaheim, California, pressed Lyons on whether ICE maintained a database on U.S. citizens.

    Correa cited a video of a masked federal immigration officer in Maine saying he would put an opponent’s name in a “nice little database” and that the person was now “considered a domestic terrorist.” Reuters reported on Tuesday that ICE officers have been tracking the names of protesters in an internal database for several months, citing two ICE officials.

    Lyons denied his agency was tracking anti-ICE protesters in a database.

    “I can assure you there is no database that is tracking U.S. citizens,” he said.

    DHS said in response to Reuters that it does not maintain a database of U.S. “domestic terrorists,” but does track threats.

    Seth Magaziner, a Democratic U.S. representative from Rhode Island, played a video clip of a border agent who sprayed a chemical irritant at a Chicago father and his 1-year-old daughter at close range in their car last year.

    “This is a family of United States citizens who were out to get groceries at a Sam’s Club in Chicago,” Magaziner said to Scott, the nation’s top border official. “Is it proper procedure to aim pepper spray into the window of a moving vehicle?”

    “I don’t have all the details on this; it’s an ongoing investigation,” Scott said. “But to answer your question, we try to avoid that … No, it is not proper procedure.”

    Despite internal ICE guidance calling for officers to stop engaging with protesters, the encounters have continued, including U.S. citizens arrested and charged after following officers in their cars.

    Reporting by Ted Hesson; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama, Rod Nickel

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    节点运行失败