新闻资讯

博客

  • 特朗普政府官员就一起此前案件被驳回后，将纽约总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯移交起诉


    更新于：2026年3月25日 / 美国东部时间晚上7:17 / CBS新闻

    据知情人士向CBS新闻透露，一名特朗普政府官员已就两起可能涉及房主保险欺诈的案件，向迈阿密和芝加哥的联邦检察官对纽约总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯提起新的刑事指控。

    联邦住房金融局局长比尔·普尔泰周三在致佛罗里达州检察官的一封信中表示，詹姆斯可能在向总部位于劳德代尔堡的环球财产保险公司（Universal Property Insurance）提交房主保险申请时伪造了信息。

    特朗普总统政府的官员多次对詹姆斯提起法律诉讼，而詹姆斯是特朗普长期以来的政敌。

    普尔泰在周三将其中一份指控文件提交给了美国佛罗里达州南区联邦检察官贾森·雷丁·基诺内斯（Jason Reding Quiñones）。该检察官目前正在领导对奥巴马政府时期官员的另一项调查，包括前中央情报局局长约翰·布伦南，调查一项情报评估，该评估认定俄罗斯试图干预2016年总统选举以帮助特朗普先生获益。此前有消息称，基诺内斯去年还曾就特别顾问杰克·史密斯对特朗普先生的调查寻求相关记录。

    在周三给美国伊利诺伊州北区联邦检察官安德鲁·布特罗斯（Andrew Boutros）的另一封信中，普尔泰指控詹姆斯在向总部位于伊利诺伊州的好事达保险公司（Allstate）提交申请时可能伪造了信息。

    MS NOW最先报道了这些新的刑事指控。

    司法部发言人证实，其美国检察官办公室已收到相关指控文件。

    詹姆斯的律师阿贝·洛厄尔（Abbe Lowell）在被问及置评时，指责特朗普政府”滥用职权，试图通过重新命名、重新提交和重复毫无根据的指控来对她进行报复”。

    洛厄尔表示：”这些绝望的策略将失败——就像之前的每一次尝试一样——并暴露出一个政府为了 petty political payback（注：原文为petty political payback，此处保留原文术语或译为”卑劣的政治报复”）而放弃了对美国人民的责任。”

    CBS新闻已联系普尔泰的代表寻求置评。

    詹姆斯去年秋天在联邦法院被指控犯有银行欺诈罪和向金融机构作虚假陈述罪，指控她在申请弗吉尼亚州一处房产的抵押贷款时歪曲信息以获取更优惠的贷款条件。但这些指控后来被驳回。

    起诉书是在普尔泰将她移交给司法部可能涉及抵押贷款欺诈之后提出的，尽管指控的是另一处房产，而该房产并未在他的指控中列出。

    詹姆斯否认在这一事件中有不当行为，并辩称特朗普政府是出于政治原因针对她。在特朗普先生两届白宫任期之间，詹姆斯在民事法庭起诉他，指控他虚报自己房地产资产的价值。纽约一名法官裁定特朗普先生及其公司犯有欺诈罪，并下令他们支付数亿美元的赔偿，但上诉法院后来撤销了财务判决。

    詹姆斯过去曾针对普尔泰公开试图让她被起诉的行为进行反击。在去年的法庭文件中，詹姆斯的律师指责普尔泰利用监督抵押贷款巨头房利美和房地美的联邦住房金融局作为”针对特朗普总统政敌的武器”。

    CBS新闻本月早些时候报道称，普尔泰此后因据称在詹姆斯案件中受到威胁而寻求保护性安全细节。

    一名联邦法官11月以临时美国检察官林赛·哈利根（Lindsey Halligan）被非法任命为由驳回了银行欺诈起诉书。哈利根对前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米提起的另一项刑事诉讼也被驳回。次月，两个联邦大陪审团拒绝就银行欺诈指控重新起诉詹姆斯。

    起诉书称，詹姆斯2020年以抵押贷款购买弗吉尼亚州一处房产，该抵押贷款要求她将其作为第二套房使用，但她却将其出租并作为投资房产，从而获得了较低的抵押贷款利率。

    CBS新闻此前报道，检察官今年早些时候开始了一项新的调查，重点调查詹姆斯与其长期理发师伊耶萨塔·马什（Iyesata Marsh）之间的金融交易，该调查由路易斯安那州西区和纽约北区的美国检察官办公室联合领导。

    纽约州总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯
    迈克尔·M·圣地亚哥 /盖蒂图片社

    Trump official refers New York AG Letitia James for prosecution after a previous case was dismissed

    Updated on: March 25, 2026 / 7:17 PM EDT / CBS News

    A Trump administration official has made new criminal referrals against New York Attorney General Letitia James to federal prosecutors in Miami and Chicago for two cases of possible homeowner’s insurance fraud, sources familiar with the matter told CBS News.

    Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte said in a letter Wednesday to prosecutors in Florida that James may have falsified information on her homeowner’s insurance application to a Ft. Lauderdale-based company, Universal Property Insurance.

    Officials in President Trump’s administration have repeatedly pursued legal actions against James, a longstanding Trump foe.

    Pulte sent one of Wednesday’s referrals to Jason Reding Quiñones, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. That prosecutor is currently leading another investigation into Obama-era officials, including former CIA Director John Brennan, over an intelligence assessment that determined that Russia had tried to interfere in the 2016 presidential election to help benefit Mr. Trump. Last year, Quiñones also sought records in connection with special counsel Jack Smith’s investigations into Mr. Trump, sources previously said.

    In a separate letter Wednesday to Andrew Boutros, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, Pulte alleged James may have falsified information on an application to Illinois-based Allstate.

    MS NOW was first to report on the new criminal referrals.

    A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed that its U.S. Attorney’s Offices had received referrals.

    Asked for comment, Abbe Lowell, an attorney for James, accused the Trump administration of “abusing their power to pursue a vendetta against her by trying to rename, refile, and repeat baseless allegations.”

    “These desperate tactics will fail — just as every previous attempt has failed — and exposes an Administration that has abandoned its responsibility to the American people in favor of petty political payback,” Lowell said.

    CBS News has reached out to representatives for Pulte for comment.

    James was charged in federal court last fall on counts of bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution, alleging she misrepresented information about a property in Virginia to seek more favorable mortgage terms. But those charges were later dismissed.

    The indictment came after Pulte had referred her to the department for possible mortgage fraud, though the charges turned on a different property that was not listed in his referral.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James Michael M. Santiago / Getty Images

    James denied wrongdoing in that situation and argued that the Trump administration was targeting her for political reasons. In between President Trump’s terms in the White House, James sued him in civil court for allegedly lying about the value of his real estate assets. A New York judge found Mr. Trump and his company liable for fraud and ordered them to pay hundreds of millions of dollars, but an appellate court later threw out the financial judgement.

    James has taken aim at Pulte in the past over his public efforts to get her indicted. In court papers last year, James’s attorneys accused Pulte of using the Federal Housing Finance Agency — which oversees mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — into a “weapon to be brandished against President Trump’s political enemies.”

    CBS News reported earlier this month that Pulte has since sought a protective security detail over threats he allegedly received in connection with the James case.

    A federal judge dismissed the bank fraud indictment in November on the grounds that interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan was appointed to the role unlawfully. A separate criminal case brought by Halligan against former FBI Director James Comey was also dismissed. The following month, two federal grand juries declined to re-indict James on bank fraud charges.

    The indictment alleged James bought a house in Virginia in 2020 with a mortgage that required her to use it as a second home, but she instead rented it out and used it as an investment property, allowing her to get a lower mortgage rate.

    Prosecutors earlier this year started a new line of inquiry that centers on financial transactions between James and her long-time hairdresser Iyesata Marsh, CBS News previously reported. The new investigation is being jointly led by the U.S. Attorney’s Offices in the Western District of Louisiana and the Northern District of New York.

  • 特朗普政府高级住房官员向纽约总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯发出新刑事举报


    By Kaitlan Collins

    更新于14分钟前
    更新于2026年3月25日，美国东部时间晚上7:46
    发布于2026年3月25日，美国东部时间晚上7:01

    唐纳德·特朗普总统的高级住房官员比尔·普尔特周三向纽约州总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯发出两项新的刑事举报，试图重启政府对其政治对手的持续法律追究。

    据一位知情人士透露，联邦住房金融局局长普尔特向司法部提交了两份举报，一份是给伊利诺伊州北区美国检察官办公室，另一份是给佛罗里达州南区美国检察官办公室。

    两份举报均指控存在“涉嫌房主保险欺诈”行为。

    一份举报称，詹姆斯在为其位于弗吉尼亚州诺福克的房产提交房主保险申请时，“可能欺诈了一家伊利诺伊州的公司——好事达保险公司”。另一份举报则称，她可能在向佛罗里达州劳德代尔堡的环球财产保险公司提交房主保险申请时实施了同样行为。

    两份举报均引用了特朗普的长期法律顾问迈克·戴维斯在社交平台X上发布的帖子。

    美国司法部发言人告诉CNN：“司法部可以确认，我们已收到美国检察官办公室的举报。”

    詹姆斯的律师阿贝·洛厄尔指责政府继续进行“不当报复运动，而非帮助降低美国不断上涨的生活成本”。

    洛厄尔在给CNN的声明中表示：“由于多次失败——法官和大陪审团驳回了他们对詹姆斯总检察长的指控尝试——特朗普及其政治支持者不断滥用职权，试图通过重新命名、重新提交和重复无根据的指控来对她进行报复。他们继续这种不当报复运动，而非帮助降低美国不断上涨的生活成本。这些绝望的策略将会失败——就像之前的每一次尝试一样——这暴露了一个政府为了 petty political payback（注：此处原文为petty political payback，指 petty政治报复，中文语境中保留“政治报复”更准确）而抛弃了对美国人民的责任。”

    如果联邦检察官根据普尔特的建议提起新的指控，此案可能与去年特朗普司法部在弗吉尼亚州东区对詹姆斯提起的失败的欺诈案极为相似。

    普尔特的新举报似乎涉及与弗吉尼亚州联邦案件核心相关的同一处房产，詹姆斯对此否认有罪，且法官认定美国检察官办公室未提出有效指控。不过，新的举报可能会在另一个联邦司法管辖区进行调查。

    詹姆斯于2025年10月被起诉，罪名是向金融机构作虚假陈述和银行欺诈各一项。她对这两项指控均不认罪，但由于法官认定特朗普任命的弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市临时美国检察官林赛·哈利根无效，案件最终被驳回。

    本文已更新补充更多细节。

    CNN的凯特琳·波兰特对本文有贡献。

    Top Trump housing official issues new criminal referral for New York AG Letitia James

    By Kaitlan Collins

    Updated 14 min ago
    Updated Mar 25, 2026, 7:46 PM ET
    PUBLISHED Mar 25, 2026, 7:01 PM ET

    President Donald Trump’s top housing official Bill Pulte issued two new criminal referrals for New York Attorney General Letitia James on Wednesday, attempting to revive the administration’s ongoing legal pursuit of one of his political opponents.

    According to a person familiar with the matter, Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, issued two referrals to the Justice Department, one to the US Attorney for Northern District of Illinois and another to the US Attorney for Southern District of Florida.

    Both alleged “suspected homeowners insurance fraud.”

    One referral alleges James “may have defrauded” an “Illinois-based company, Allstate” when she submitted a homeowners insurance application for her Norfolk, Virginia, property. The other alleges she may have done so on her homeowners insurance application to a Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based company, Universal Property Insurance.

    Both referrals cite posts on X by Mike Davis, a longtime Trump legal adviser.

    A DOJ spokesperson told CNN, “The Department of Justice can confirm that referrals were received by our US Attorney Offices.”

    An attorney for James, Abbe Lowell, accused the administration of continuing an “improper revenge campaign instead of helping bring down the rising cost of living in this country.”

    “Frustrated by repeated failures, where judges and grand juries have rejected their attempts to charge Attorney General James, Trump and his political enablers keep abusing their power to pursue a vendetta against her by trying to rename, refile, and repeat baseless allegations,” Lowell said in a statement to CNN.

    “They continue this improper revenge campaign instead of helping bring down the rising cost of living in this country. These desperate tactics will fail — just as every previous attempt has failed — and exposes an Administration that has abandoned its responsibility to the American people in favor of petty political payback.”

    If federal prosecutors were to pursue a new set of charges based on Pulte’s recommendation now, the case may look substantially like the Trump Justice Department’s failed fraud case last year against James in the Eastern District of Virginia.

    Pulte’s new referrals appear to be about the same house that was central to the Virginia-based federal case, to which James pleaded not guilty and a judge found wasn’t charged by a valid US Attorney. The new referrals, however, could potentially be investigated in another federal court district.

    James was indicted in October 2025 on one count of making false statements to a financial institution and one count of bank fraud. She pleaded not guilty to the two charges, but the case was ultimately dismissed after the judge found that Trump’s appointment of interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan in Alexandria, Virginia, was invalid.

    This story has been updated with additional details.

    CNN’s Katelyn Polantz contributed to this report.

  • 伊朗或在曼德海峡开辟新战线 反制美国地面入侵


    发布/2026年3月26日 07:05

    一名不愿公开姓名的伊朗军方消息人士说，如果敌方试图对伊朗岛屿或本土发起地面行动，或者通过海军行动在波斯湾和阿曼湾对伊朗施压，伊朗将在曼德海峡开辟新的战线。

    伊朗塔斯尼姆通讯社星期三（3月25日）的报道引述这名伊朗军方消息人士说，伊朗有意志也有能力威胁曼德海峡。如果美国人想用愚蠢的行动打通霍尔木兹海峡，就得小心不要再给自己增加一条带来困境和麻烦的海峡。

    消息人士称：“若敌方试图对伊朗岛屿或我国其他任何领土展开地面行动，或透过波斯湾（Persian Gulf）和阿曼海（Sea of Oman）的海军行动让伊朗付出代价，我们将‘出其不意’地开辟其他战线。”

    曼德海峡（Bab el-Mandeb Strait）是连接红海和亚丁湾的海峡，是沟通大西洋、地中海和印度洋的“咽喉”，为连接欧亚非三大洲的“水上走廊”，对全球石油和商品运输至关重要。

    另据法新社报道，伊朗与也门胡塞武装（Houthi）关系密切，并为其提供武器。2023年10月，胡塞武装为报复以色列轰炸加沙地带，开始袭击船只，导致红海航运严重受阻。

    此后，胡塞武装遭受空袭重创，但分析人士认为，他们可能会不再置身于当前的美国与伊朗战争之外，转而扮演更加积极的角色。然而，胡塞武装在意识形态上与伊朗的联系相对薄弱，长期以来也比其他受伊朗支持的中东武装组织享有更大的独立性。

    新华社报道，也门胡塞武装政治局成员布海提20日对俄罗斯新闻社说，胡塞武装正考虑所有可能选项，以支持伊朗抵抗美国和以色列袭击。如果不得不封锁曼德海峡，胡塞武装只攻击那些参与袭击伊朗、伊拉克、黎巴嫩和巴勒斯坦的国家的船只。

    伊朗或在曼德海峡开辟新战线 反制美国地面入侵

    发布/2026年3月26日 07:05

    一名不愿公开姓名的伊朗军方消息人士说，如果敌方试图对伊朗岛屿或本土发起地面行动，或者通过海军行动在波斯湾和阿曼湾对伊朗施压，伊朗将在曼德海峡开辟新的战线。

    伊朗塔斯尼姆通讯社星期三（3月25日）的报道引述这名伊朗军方消息人士说，伊朗有意志也有能力威胁曼德海峡。如果美国人想用愚蠢的行动打通霍尔木兹海峡，就得小心不要再给自己增加一条带来困境和麻烦的海峡。

    消息人士称：“若敌方试图对伊朗岛屿或我国其他任何领土展开地面行动，或透过波斯湾（Persian Gulf）和阿曼海（Sea of Oman）的海军行动让伊朗付出代价，我们将‘出其不意’地开辟其他战线。”

    曼德海峡（Bab el-Mandeb Strait）是连接红海和亚丁湾的海峡，是沟通大西洋、地中海和印度洋的“咽喉”，为连接欧亚非三大洲的“水上走廊”，对全球石油和商品运输至关重要。

    另据法新社报道，伊朗与也门胡塞武装（Houthi）关系密切，并为其提供武器。2023年10月，胡塞武装为报复以色列轰炸加沙地带，开始袭击船只，导致红海航运严重受阻。

    此后，胡塞武装遭受空袭重创，但分析人士认为，他们可能会不再置身于当前的美国与伊朗战争之外，转而扮演更加积极的角色。然而，胡塞武装在意识形态上与伊朗的联系相对薄弱，长期以来也比其他受伊朗支持的中东武装组织享有更大的独立性。

    新华社报道，也门胡塞武装政治局成员布海提20日对俄罗斯新闻社说，胡塞武装正考虑所有可能选项，以支持伊朗抵抗美国和以色列袭击。如果不得不封锁曼德海峡，胡塞武装只攻击那些参与袭击伊朗、伊拉克、黎巴嫩和巴勒斯坦的国家的船只。

  • 美伊提出截然不同要求，结束战争的障碍浮出水面


    By Jennifer Hansler, Kylie Atwood, Tal Shalev
    58分钟前
    发布于 2026年3月25日，美国东部时间下午6:57

    大约一个月前，美国总统唐纳德·特朗普政府仍声称外交是其首选方案，美国特使史蒂夫·维特科夫和贾里德·库什纳在日内瓦与伊朗人进行了间接会面。两天后，美国和以色列对伊朗发动了战争。

    如今，在特朗普周一突然转变立场，宣布两国正在谈判结束冲突后，美国再次寻求重返谈判桌——但尽管白宫表达了公开乐观情绪，重返谈判桌的道路上仍存在重大障碍。

    多位消息人士告诉CNN，海湾和欧洲盟友正密切关注局势，并对结束冲突或甚至实施停火的谈判缺乏势头日益担忧。

    尽管各方正在努力安排双方会面，但消息人士表示，鉴于两国需求之间存在巨大差距，此类会面不太可能很快举行。

    美国和以色列持续军事行动的阴影在潜在讨论中挥之不去。与此同时，德黑兰认为自己拥有战争爆发前没有的关键工具：对霍尔木兹海峡的实际控制权。

    “双方在登上谈判桌前必须就最基本问题达成一致，”一位地区消息人士告诉CNN，补充称伊朗现在对美国提出的“最高要求”给予了“最大程度的拒绝”。

    本周早些时候，美国通过巴基斯坦向伊朗传达了一份15点要求清单。其中许多要求与战前提出的类似：伊朗承诺不发展核武器，美国接管伊朗的高浓缩铀，限制德黑兰的防御能力，以及停止伊朗对代理人的支持。

    “如果这真的是美国的立场，‘就不会有成功的谈判’，”曾在国家安全委员会担任伊朗事务主任的前美国政府官员内特·斯旺森告诉CNN。

    战争的另一个关键参与者以色列担心，美国可能宣布停火一个月以促进与伊朗的谈判，两位以色列消息人士告诉CNN。然而，其中一位消息人士表示，以色列对突破性进展的前景仍持怀疑态度。

    “伊朗可能愿意做出的最大让步，无法满足美国要求的最低条件，”该消息人士表示，并补充称以色列认为美国框架中的几个要素“对以色列是积极且有益的”——特别是关于伊朗核计划和其地区代理人活动的内容。不过，另一位以色列消息人士称，从长远来看，以色列担心最终的停火协议不会解决其所有关切，特别是伊朗的弹道导弹计划和其在该地区的代理人活动。

    斯旺森表示，伊朗可能认为特朗普采取了与之前相同的立场——要么投降要么升级——而且伊朗似乎并不重视外交前景。他说，德黑兰提出的“同样大胆且不切实际的提议”。

    周三，据伊朗国家媒体Press TV报道，一名伊朗官员概述了该国自己的要求清单。这些要求包括：完全停止“侵略和暗杀”；建立确保伊朗战争不再重演的具体机制；确保战争损害赔偿和赔偿的明确支付；结束所有战线上对伊朗在该地区所有代理人的军事行动；以及确保伊朗对霍尔木兹海峡的主权。

    尚无可行协议迹象

    尽管美国在削弱伊朗军事能力方面取得进展，但德黑兰封锁关键水道的能力导致燃料价格飙升，全球市场动荡。这也是伊朗在未来谈判中的潜在筹码，消息人士称，目前双方之间或特朗普政府的任何中间人都无法传达可行协议的轮廓。

    一些海湾国家和其他美国盟友希望立即停火并开放海峡，但另一些国家希望达成更全面的协议。阿联酋驻美大使优素福·阿尔-奥泰巴周三在《华尔街日报》的专栏文章中写道，目前停火还不够，主张达成全面协议。

    “简单的停火是不够的。我们需要一个决定性的结果，解决伊朗的全方位威胁：核能力、导弹、无人机、恐怖代理人以及对国际海上航道的封锁，”奥泰巴写道。

    “霍尔木兹海峡对伊朗来说是一种新工具，我们从未见过，”现在就职于大西洋理事会的斯旺森表示，他指出伊朗喜欢充当“通行费运营商”。

    伊朗官员继续坚称他们没有与美国谈判，但伊朗外交部长阿巴斯·阿拉格奇承认两国通过调解人进行了信息交流。

    “发送信息并以警告或陈述立场回应的行为，不称为谈判或对话，而是信息交流，”他在伊朗国家广播公司说。

    “在这些信息中，提出的想法已传达给高层当局，如果需要采取立场，他们会宣布，”阿拉格奇周三表示。

    与此同时，白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·利维特周三坚持称“谈判仍在继续”且“富有成效”。

    两位美国高级政府官员告诉CNN，特朗普政府正在努力安排本周末在巴基斯坦举行会议，讨论战争的出路。目前计划副总统JD·万斯可能与其他高级特朗普官员一起前往该国。

    两位地区消息人士表示，伊朗代表已向特朗普政府表示，他们不想重新与维特科夫和库什纳进行谈判，而更愿意与万斯接触。特朗普周二表示，万斯、国务卿马尔科·卢比奥、库什纳和维特科夫目前正在领导与伊朗的谈判。

    官员们警告称，潜在访问的时间、地点和参会人员仍不明确。两位知情人士表示，土耳其也被建议作为谈判地点，因为一些官员对在巴基斯坦举行会议表示安全担忧。巴基斯坦和土耳其都曾担任美国和伊朗之间的中间人。

    在关于本周末潜在谈判的来回交流中，一位高级海湾官员表示，海湾盟友私下敦促特朗普政府不要通过派遣地面部队占领霍姆兹岛或移除伊朗的高浓缩铀来升级战争，他们担心美国占领该岛会导致高伤亡，可能触发伊朗对地区基础设施的报复，并延长冲突。

    然而，进一步的美国军事行动的可能性依然存在。两位知情人士称，约1000名第82空降师士兵预计将在未来几天部署到中东，使该地区日益增长的军事力量进一步加强，而特朗普政府称正在与伊朗谈判结束冲突。

    利维特周三警告称，如果“伊朗不接受当前局势的现实”，特朗普“准备发动地狱式的攻击”。

    CNN的Alayna Treene、Kristen Holmes、Kevin Liptak和Mohammed Tawfeeq对此报道有贡献。

    Obstacles to ending war come into focus as US and Iran outline starkly different demands

    By Jennifer Hansler, Kylie Atwood, Tal Shalev
    58 min ago
    PUBLISHED Mar 25, 2026, 6:57 PM ET

    Almost exactly one month ago, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner met indirectly with the Iranians in Geneva as the Trump administration continued to claim diplomacy was its preferred option. Two days later, the US and Israel launched their war against Iran.

    Now, the United States is again seeking to return to talks after President Donald Trump’s about face on Monday when he announced the two countries were negotiating an end to the conflict –- but there are significant hurdles on the path back to the negotiating table despite public optimism voiced by the White House.

    Gulf and European allies are closely watching and growing concerned about the lack of momentum towards negotiations to end the conflict or even put a ceasefire into place, multiple sources told CNN.

    Although there are efforts underway to try to arrange a meeting between the two sides, sources say such a gathering is unlikely to take place soon given the wide gap between the two countries’ demands.

    The specter of continued military action by the US and Israel looms large over potential discussions. Meanwhile, Tehran perceives itself to possess a key tool that it did not have prior to the outbreak of the war: virtual control over the Strait of Hormuz.

    “The very basics must be agreed on before the two sides board and take off for negotiations,” one regional source, told CNN adding that Iranians have now given “a maximum no to a maximalist offer.”

    Earlier this week, the US conveyed, via Pakistan, a 15-point list of demands for Iran. Many of the demands echo those made by the US before the war began: Iran committing to no nuclear weapons, the US taking possession of Iran’s highly enriched uranium, limits on Tehran’s defense capabilities, and an end of Iran’s support for proxies.

    If that is truly the US’ position, “there is no world where there’ll be successful negotiations,” Nate Swanson, a former career US government official who served as director for Iran at the National Security Council, told CNN.

    The other key player in the war, Israel, is concerned that the US may declare a one-month ceasefire in order to facilitate negotiations with Iran, two Israeli sources told CNN. However, the country remains skeptical about the prospect of a breakthrough, according to one of the sources.

    “The maximum Iran might be willing to give does not meet the minimum the US is demanding,” the source said, adding that Israel views several elements of the US framework as “positive and good for Israel” -– in particular those regarding Iran’s nuclear program and the activities of its regional proxies. However, another Israeli source said that in the long run, Israel is wary that an eventual ceasefire agreement will not address all of its concerns, particularly regarding Iran’s ballistic missile program and proxy activities around the region.

    Swanson said Iran likely perceives Trump is taking the same stance as before – offering capitulation or escalation – and it does not appear that Iran is taking the prospect of diplomacy seriously. Tehran, he said, is putting out “an equally as audacious and unrealistic proposal.”

    On Wednesday, an Iranian official outlined the country’s own list of demands, according to state-run media outlet Press TV. They include a complete halt to “aggression and assassinations,” establishment of concrete mechanisms to ensure the war on Iran does not resume, guaranteed and clearly defined payment of war damages and reparations, an end to military operations across all fronts and for all Iranian proxies throughout the region, and a guarantee that Iran can exercise sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.

    No sign of a viable agreement

    Tehran’s ability to snarl the key waterway, despite US progress degrading Iran’s military capabilities, has caused the price of fuel to skyrocket and set global markets on edge. It is also a potential edge for Iran in future negotiations, and sources say none of the interlocutors sending messages between the two sides or the Trump administration are now able to convey what the contours of a viable agreement might look like.

    Some Gulf nations and other US allies would like to see an immediate halt to fighting and an opening of the strait, but others want a grander deal to be reached. UAE’s Ambassador to the US Yousef Al Otaiba wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed on Wednesday saying that a ceasefire is not enough right now, advocating for an overall agreement to be struck.

    “A simple cease-fire isn’t enough. We need a conclusive outcome that addresses Iran’s full range of threats: nuclear capabilities, missiles, drones, terror proxies and blockades of international sea lanes,” Otaiba wrote.

    “Strait of Hormuz is a new tool for them in a way we haven’t seen before,” said Swanson, who is now at the Atlantic Council, noting that Iran likes to serve as “tollbooth operator” for the passage.

    Iranian officials have continued to maintain they are not in negotiations with the US, but Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi did acknowledge an exchange of messages between the two countries through mediators.

    “The fact that messages are being sent and we respond with warnings or state our positions is not called negotiation or dialogue; it is an exchange of messages,” he said on the state-run Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting network.

    “In these messages, ideas were raised that have been conveyed to top authorities, and if a position needs to be taken, they will announce it,” Araghchi said Wednesday.

    White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, meanwhile, insisted on Wednesday that “talks continue” and “they are productive.”

    Trump administration officials are working to arrange a meeting in Pakistan this weekend to discuss an off ramp to the war, two senior administration officials told CNN. The current plans have Vice President JD Vance traveling to the country, possibly alongside other top Trump officials.

    Iranian representatives have let the Trump administration know it does not want to re-enter negotiations with Witkoff and Kushner and would prefer to engage with Vance, two regional sources said. Trump on Tuesday said Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Kushner and Witkoff are currently leading negotiations with Iran.

    Officials cautioned that the timing of a potential trip is fluid, as is the location and who may attend. Turkey has also been suggested as a potential location for the talks, two sources familiar with the matter said, as some officials raise security concerns about holding a meeting in Pakistan. Both Pakistan and Turkey have served as intermediaries between the US and Iran.

    Amid the flurry of back and forth about potential talks this weekend, Gulf allies are privately urging the Trump administration against ramping up the war by putting boots on the ground to occupy Kharg Island or remove Iran’s highly enriched uranium, a senior Gulf official said, citing concerns that a US occupation of the island would result in high casualties, likely trigger Iranian retaliation against regional infrastructure, and prolong the conflict.

    Still, the potential for further US military action is looming. Approximately 1,000 US soldiers with the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division are expecting to deploy in coming days to the Middle East, according to two sources familiar with the matter, adding to the growing military firepower in the region as the Trump administration says it is in talks with Iran to end the conflict.

    Leavitt warned Wednesday that if “Iran fails to accept the reality of the current moment,” Trump “is prepared to unleash hell.”

    CNN’s Alayna Treene, Kristen Holmes, Kevin Liptak and Mohammed Tawfeeq contributed reporting.

  • 联邦紧急事务管理局在联邦法官就民主党领导州提起的诉讼作出裁决后恢复灾害缓解项目


    2026年3月25日 / 美国东部时间晚上7:42 / CBS/美联社

    联邦紧急事务管理局（FEMA）周三重新开放了一项重大韧性赠款项目的申请，该项目是该局去年取消的，而这距离联邦法官下令FEMA提供资金还不到三周。

    FEMA将提供10亿美元用于”建设有韧性的基础设施和社区”（BRIC）项目，该项目旨在帮助各州、地方政府、领地和部落开展防灾准备项目，以抵御火灾、洪水、地震和飓风等自然灾害。

    FEMA代理负责人凯伦·S·埃文斯（Karen S. Evans）在宣布恢复该项目的声明中表示：”如果实施得当，缓解活动可以挽救生命并降低未来灾害的成本。”

    特朗普政府削减了FEMA多个项目中的灾害准备资金。自去年以来，特朗普总统一直未批准任何州或部落提出的灾害缓解资金申请，而这通常是重大灾害声明中的常规附加项。

    尽管如此，FEMA一份概述该赠款机会的文件显示，政府可能现在正接受缓解灾害的某些方面，称”BRIC旨在将联邦投资的重点从灾后反应性支出转向以基础设施为重点的前瞻性灾害缓解”。

    此次资金宣布之前，FEMA在之前的代理负责人卡梅伦·汉密尔顿（Cameron Hamilton）领导下，于2025年4月取消了BRIC项目，称其”浪费且无效”。这一决定遭到了共和党和民主党议员的反对，因为约36亿美元的资金被冻结，这些资金原本用于保护美国各地的基础设施、社区和房屋的多年项目。

    去年的一项哥伦比亚广播公司新闻调查显示，BRIC资金削减不成比例地影响了支持特朗普2024年选举的县，数据分析发现，三分之二失去资金的县都投票支持特朗普。特别是东南部易受自然灾害影响的弱势社区受到了严重影响。

    FEMA数据显示，资金削减影响了近700个项目，包括佛罗里达州南部饱受洪水困扰的运河盆地改造工程，以及路易斯安那州的新防洪系统——2016年该州中央镇60%的建筑在暴雨中被毁。

    去年12月，联邦法官作出裁决，认定FEMA不能取消BRIC项目，并命令FEMA在22个民主党领导的州和哥伦比亚特区联合起诉特朗普政府取消该项目后改变决定。

    这起诉讼发生在FEMA被指责对德克萨斯州洪水应对不力导致130多人死亡（其中至少37名儿童）之后，同时也是在纽约、新泽西到新墨西哥等多个州遭遇暴雨和洪水淹没社区几天后提起的。

    在FEMA未能发放资金后，美国地区法官理查德·G·斯特恩斯本月再次下令FEMA采取措施恢复该项目。

    上周，FEMA宣布在国土安全部（DHS）停摆结束后恢复BRIC项目的资金支持，称已完成对该项目的评估，该项目最初是在特朗普第一任期内签署成为法律的。FEMA在声明中表示，在拜登政府时期，BRIC变得过于官僚化，”过度关注’气候变化’举措”。

    各州将有120天时间申请这一新的资金机会，该机会涵盖2024和2025财年，因为FEMA去年取消了该年度的申请。

    虽然恢复的资金为一些地区恢复了急需的援助，但FEMA实施了新规则，这与特朗普政府试图将更多灾害管理责任推给各州的做法一致。

    新规则包括停止为灾害缓解规划和非财务直接技术援助提供资金，这可能影响资源和专业知识较少的小型社区。

    FEMA在声明中表示：”该项目现在最大限度地提高了州和地方政府在韧性建设和风险降低方面的责任，而不是联邦政府投资于广泛的活动。”

    然而，新的赠款也包括对单个受赠者可获得的资金设置上限，并优先考虑新申请者和”贫困社区”。这些变化可能是对过去批评的回应——即BRIC项目偏袒沿海州，农村地区难以获得资金。

    根据FEMA的说法，其他变化还包括优先考虑”准备实施”的重大基础设施项目，以及鼓励”最新的抗灾建筑规范”。

    与此同时，目前尚不清楚各州何时能恢复已获批准的赠款发放。

    民主党众议员、众议院交通和基础设施委员会排名成员里克·拉森（Rick Larsen）周三在声明中表示，BRIC项目的取消阻碍了其华盛顿选区防洪墙的建设。”减缓各州防灾准备能力是目光短浅的，像阿伯丁这样的社区为此付出了代价。”

    根据气候中心数据库，在过去十年中，造成10亿美元或更多损失的与天气和气候相关的灾害数量几乎与之前35年的总和相当。

    多项研究表明，灾害准备的预防性投资可以产生显著节省。2024年由美国商会资助的一项研究发现，每投资1美元用于灾害准备，就能在经济影响、损害和清理成本中节省13美元。

    在克里斯蒂·诺姆（Kristi Noem）任期动荡之后，前FEMA官员、国会议员和灾害幸存者谨慎地希望新任国土安全部部长马克韦恩·穆林（Markwayne Mullin）能为该机构带来更多稳定。穆林在上周的参议院确认听证会上支持FEMA的使命，并表示支持提高FEMA效率、加快向州和地方政府支付款项以及更好地服务农村社区的努力。

    FEMA resumes disaster mitigation program following judge’s order on lawsuit brought by Democratic-led states

    March 25, 2026 / 7:42 PM EDT / CBS/AP

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency on Wednesday opened applications for a major resilience grant program that the agency canceled last year, less than three weeks after a federal judge ordered FEMA to make the funding available.

    FEMA will make $1 billion available for the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program, which helps states, local governments, territories and tribes take on preparedness projects to harden against natural hazards like fires, floods, earthquakes and hurricanes.

    “When done correctly, mitigation activities save lives and reduce the cost of future disasters,” Karen S. Evans, FEMA’s acting leader, said in a statement announcing the resumption.

    The Trump administration has slashed disaster preparedness dollars across multiple FEMA programs. It’s been one year since President Trump approved any state or tribe’s request for hazard mitigation funding, a typical add on to major disaster declarations.

    Still, a FEMA document outlining the grant opportunity signals the administration might now be embracing aspects of mitigation to safeguard against disasters, stating that “BRIC aims to shift the focus of federal investments away from reactive post-disaster spending towards proactive infrastructure-focused hazard mitigation.”

    The funding announcement comes after FEMA under a previous acting leader, Cameron Hamilton, canceled the BRIC program in April 2025, calling it “wasteful and ineffective.” That decision drew blowback from Republican and Democratic lawmakers as roughly $3.6 billion was halted for what amounted to several years’ worth of projects to protect infrastructure, communities and homes across the U.S.

    A CBS News investigationlast year revealed that the BRIC funding cuts disproportionately affected counties that supported Mr. Trump in the 2024 election, with two-thirds of the counties that lost funding having voted for the president. The elimination of the BRIC program especially deprived vulnerable communities across the Southeast — an area prone to natural disasters — the CBS News data analysis found.

    FEMA data shows the cut impacted nearly 700 projects, includingimprovements to canal basins in South Floridaplagued by flooding anda new flood control systemin Louisiana, where 60% of the structures in the town of Central were devastated by torrential rains in 2016.

    A federal judge last December ruled that FEMA could not eliminate BRIC, and ordered FEMA to reverse course after a coalition of 22 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbiasued the Trump administrationover the cancellation.

    The lawsuit came as FEMA faced scrutiny about its response tofloods in Texasthat killed more than 130 people, including at least 37 children. It was also filed days after heavy rains and flooding inundated communities in states ranging fromNew YorkandNew JerseytoNew Mexico.

    After FEMA failed to release funding, U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns again ordered FEMA this month to take steps toward restoring the program.

    Last week, FEMA announced it would resume program support for BRIC awards when the DHS shutdown ended, saying that it had finished evaluating the program that was originally signed into law during Trump’s first term. Under former President Joe Biden, BRIC became too bureaucratic and “focused on ‘climate change’ initiatives,” FEMA said in a statement.

    States will have 120 days to apply for the new funding opportunity, which covers fiscal years 2024 and 2025, since FEMA rescinded last year’s opportunity.

    While the resumed funding restores access to badly needed assistance for some areas, FEMA imposed new rules that are in line with the Trump administration’s attempt to push more responsibility for disaster management on states.

    The new rules, which include the cessation of funding for hazard mitigation planning and non-financial direct technical assistance, could impact smaller communities with fewer resources and expertise.

    “The program now maximizes state and local responsibility for resilience and risk reduction rather than federal investing in a wide range of activities,” a FEMA statement said.

    However, the new grants also include certain caps on how much any single recipient can receive, and prioritize new applicants and “impoverished communities.” Those changes could be nods to past critiques that the BRIC program favored coastal states and was difficult for rural areas to access.

    Additional changes include prioritizing major infrastructure projects that “are ready to implement,” according to FEMA, and that incentivize “the latest hazard-resistant building codes.”

    Meanwhile, it’s still unclear how quickly they can expect resumption of the grants they were already awarded.

    BRIC’s cancellation held up construction of a flood wall in his Washington district, Rep. Rick Larsen, a Democrat and House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee ranking member, said in a statement Wednesday. “Slowing states’ ability to prepare for disasters was shortsighted, and communities like Aberdeen paid the price,” Larsen said.

    In the last decade, there have been almost as many weather- and climate-related disasters causing $1 billion in damages or more as there were in the 35 years preceding that, according to a Climate Central database.

    Multiple studies have shown that preemptive investments in disaster readiness can yield significant savings.A 2024 studyfunded by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce found every $1 invested in disaster preparation saved $13 in economic impact, damage and cleanup costs.

    Former FEMA officials, lawmakers and disaster survivors have expressed cautious hope thatnewly sworn in Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullincould bring more stability to the agency after Kristi Noem’s tumultuous tenure. Mullin endorsed FEMA’s mission at his Senate confirmation hearing last week and said he backed efforts to make FEMA more effective, speed up payments to state and local jurisdictions and better serve rural communities.

  • 美机场安检排队时间创新高 资金短缺令TSA陷入用工荒


    2026年3月26日 07:32 / 联合早报

    3月25日，在纽约市皇后区的拉瓜迪亚机场，人们排着长队等待安检。 （法新社）

    美国运输安全管理局（TSA）警告，国土安全部长达数周的资金停摆导致人手短缺、旅客排队时间过长、全美混乱情势加剧，机场安保面临严峻压力。

    彭博社引述TSA代理局长麦克尼尔（Ha Nguyen McNeill）星期三（3月25日）对议员的讲话说：“这导致TSA历史上最长的等待时间，部分情况下排队时长在四五个小时以上。”

    她补充说，在资金中断期间，TSA已经流失480多名安检雇员。

    受影响最严重的机场包括亚特兰大、休斯敦和纽约的机场。排队人群蜿蜒穿过航站楼、行李提取处，甚至排到室外。

    社交媒体广传的视频显示，沮丧的乘客埋怨漫长的等待和误机风险。星期三一早，发布在X上的视频显示，纽约拉瓜迪亚机场内排起长龙。通常机场的网站会发布等待时间，但由于情况变化过快，更新已暂停。

    在一些大型机场，某些日子有多达40%至50%的TSA雇员缺勤，迫使TSA不得不合并安检通道并缩减运营规模。

    此次停摆始于2月14日资金到期，至今已约40天。由于在移民执法政策上存在争议，华盛顿的僵局仍未化解。

    麦克尼尔说，移民与海关执法局（ICE）人员正在协助处理“非专业化安检职能”，以帮助应对长龙，让TSA官员能够专注于核心安保职责。她说，在机构努力维持减员运营的情况下，这些特工按照TSA 的协议行事，包括在旅行证件检查站提供帮助。

    美国总统特朗普在社交媒体发帖称，ICE特工正在帮旅客搬运行李并清理区域，“感谢ICE做出色工作”。

    美机场安检排队时间创新高 资金短缺令TSA陷入用工荒

    2026年3月26日 07:32 / 联合早报

    3月25日，在纽约市皇后区的拉瓜迪亚机场，人们排着长队等待安检。 （法新社）

    美国运输安全管理局（TSA）警告，国土安全部长达数周的资金停摆导致人手短缺、旅客排队时间过长、全美混乱情势加剧，机场安保面临严峻压力。

    彭博社引述TSA代理局长麦克尼尔（Ha Nguyen McNeill）星期三（3月25日）对议员的讲话说：“这导致TSA历史上最长的等待时间，部分情况下排队时长在四五个小时以上。”

    她补充说，在资金中断期间，TSA已经流失480多名安检雇员。

    受影响最严重的机场包括亚特兰大、休斯敦和纽约的机场。排队人群蜿蜒穿过航站楼、行李提取处，甚至排到室外。

    社交媒体广传的视频显示，沮丧的乘客埋怨漫长的等待和误机风险。星期三一早，发布在X上的视频显示，纽约拉瓜迪亚机场内排起长龙。通常机场的网站会发布等待时间，但由于情况变化过快，更新已暂停。

    在一些大型机场，某些日子有多达40%至50%的TSA雇员缺勤，迫使TSA不得不合并安检通道并缩减运营规模。

    此次停摆始于2月14日资金到期，至今已约40天。由于在移民执法政策上存在争议，华盛顿的僵局仍未化解。

    麦克尼尔说，移民与海关执法局（ICE）人员正在协助处理“非专业化安检职能”，以帮助应对长龙，让TSA官员能够专注于核心安保职责。她说，在机构努力维持减员运营的情况下，这些特工按照TSA 的协议行事，包括在旅行证件检查站提供帮助。

    美国总统特朗普在社交媒体发帖称，ICE特工正在帮旅客搬运行李并清理区域，“感谢ICE做出色工作”。

  • 美国第二巡回上诉法院维持特朗普的移民拘留政策


    2026年3月25日 美国中部时间下午6:09 / 路透社

    作者：内特·雷蒙德

    2026年3月1日，在美国明尼苏达州Fort Snelling的Whipple联邦大楼外，针对美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)持续行动的抗议活动中，当地执法部门在宣布存在非法集会后拘留了一名抗议者。路透社/蒂姆·埃文斯

    • 摘要
    • 位于圣路易斯的第八巡回法院支持特朗普的移民拘留政策
    • 明尼苏达州移民被拘留者提起数百起诉讼
    • 美国公民自由联盟在法院裁决后正考虑下一步行动

    3月25日（路透社）- 美国上诉法院周三支持特朗普政府在移民打击行动中逮捕人员后强制拘留的政策，即这些人没有获得保释的机会。这一裁决将影响明尼苏达州和其他六个州的众多案件。

    美国第八巡回上诉法院（位于圣路易斯）的一个由两人组成的小组以2比1的投票结果作出裁决，这是在数百名地方法院法官宣布该政策非法后，第二个地区上诉法院维持总统唐纳德·特朗普大规模拘留政策的决定。

    通过《每日 docket》时事通讯直接将最新法律新闻发送到您的收件箱，开启您的早晨。立即在此注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    广告

    第八巡回法院的裁决将影响其管辖范围内的七个州，包括明尼苏达州。仅在1月份，明尼苏达州就有超过400起诉讼被提起，指控人们在[此处原文可能被截断]

    Second US appeals court upholds Trump’s immigration detention policy

    March 25, 2026 6:09 PM UTC / Reuters

    By Nate Raymond

    Local law enforcement detain a protester after declaring an unlawful assembly during a demonstration against ongoing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations outside the Whipple Federal Building, in Fort Snelling, Minnesota, U.S., March 1, 2026. REUTERS/Tim Evans

    • Summary
    • St. Louis-based 8th Circuit supports Trump’s immigration detention policy
    • Hundreds of lawsuits filed in Minnesota by immigration detainees
    • ACLU considering next steps after court ruling

    March 25 (Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday endorsed the Trump ​administration’s policy of subjecting people arrested in its immigration crackdown to mandatory detention without ‌the chance to be released on bond in a ruling that will affect numerous cases in Minnesota and six other states.

    The 2-1 decision by a panel of the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals marked the second time a regional ​appeals court upheld President Donald Trump’s mass detention policy after hundreds of lower-court judges had declared ​it unlawful.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad

    The 8th Circuit’s decision will affect seven states within its jurisdiction, including Minnesota. ⁠Over 400 lawsuits were filed in Minnesota in January alone by people alleging they were wrongly detained ​during

  • 法官调查特朗普政府与墨西哥关于接受古巴人的”不成文”协议


    2026年3月25日 18:18 UTC / 路透社

    作者：内特·雷蒙德

    滞留墨西哥的古巴人在边境大桥外等候，2017年1月25日，在墨西哥新拉雷多，华盛顿撤销了一项几乎赋予所有抵达美国的古巴人自动居留权的措施后。路透社/丹尼尔·贝塞里尔 购买许可权，打开新标签页

    • 摘要
    • 法官要求了解驱逐协议细节
    • 古巴男子的律师称移民和海关执法局(ICE)违反程序和正当法律程序
    • 法官表示此案涉及向第三国驱逐的相关问题

    波士顿，3月25日（路透社）- 美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的政府已告知一家联邦法院，它根据一项

    Judge probes Trump administration on ‘unwritten’ deal for Mexico to accept Cubans

    March 25, 2026 6:18 PM UTC / Reuters

    By Nate Raymond

    Cubans stranded in Mexico stand outside the border bridge after Washington repealed a measure granting automatic residency to virtually every Cuban who arrived in the United States, in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico January 25, 2017. REUTERS/Daniel Becerril Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Judge demands details on deportation agreement
    • Cuban man’s lawyers argue ICE violated procedures, due process
    • Judge says case raises issues concerning deportations to third countries

    BOSTON, March 25 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration has informed a ​federal court that it deported about 6,000 Cubans to Mexico under an

  • 美国主要机场排长队，更多运输安全管理局人员辞职


    By David Shepardson
    2026年3月25日 美国东部时间下午5:10 更新于1分钟前

    WASHINGTON, March 25 (Reuters) – 周三，美国主要机场出现长龙，运输安全管理局（TSA）表示，自2月中旬政府部分停摆开始以来，机场安全人员辞职人数已激增至480多人。

    运输安全管理局高级官员Ha McNeill向美国众议院委员会表示，这场迫使5万名TSA人员无薪工作的纠纷正导致严重紧张局势，以及该机构历史上最长的队伍。她重申，如果人员配置问题恶化，TSA可能被迫关闭小型机场。

    路透社伊朗简报通讯将为您提供伊朗战争的最新动态和分析。[在此注册]

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    广告

    周三，总统唐纳德·特朗普表示，他可能会向机场部署国民警卫队部队以满足安全需求。

    参议院共和党人和民主党人继续辩论一项提案，该提案将允许为TSA和其他国土安全部机构恢复资金。

    McNeill指出，2025年停摆期间，有1110名TSA人员辞职。

    TSA正面临学校春假旅行高峰，客流量比去年高出约5%。最近几天，缺勤率飙升至10%以上，导致一些机场的乘客等待安检超过4小时。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    项目1/2 2026年3月25日，在美国德克萨斯州休斯顿的乔治·布什洲际机场，乘客在TSA安检排长队，这是因为资金僵局迫使5万名机场安全人员无薪工作，导致机场延误。REUTERS/Antranik Tavitian

    [1/2] 2026年3月25日，在美国德克萨斯州休斯顿的乔治·布什洲际机场，乘客在TSA安检排长队，这是因为资金僵局迫使5万名机场安全人员无薪工作，导致机场延误。REUTERS/Antranik Tavitian [购买许可权，在新标签页打开]

    McNeill说，一些TSA特工”在机场车里睡觉以节省油钱，卖血和血浆，并从事第二份和第三份工作来维持生计，同时在穿制服时仍需以最高标准履行职责，保护出行公众。”

    McNeill对如果更多TSA工作人员辞职可能难以应对即将到来的世界杯期间的大量人流表示担忧。

    民主党人在明尼阿波利斯的特工枪杀美国公民Renee Good和Alex Pretti后，扣留了国土安全部的资金，同时要求改变管理其移民行动的规则。共和党人拒绝了民主党提出的为TSA提供资金的提议，同时就移民和海关执法局（ICE）特工的运作改革进行谈判。

    数百名美国移民特工和国土安全调查局特工于周一开始在14个美国机场部署，以协助安全检查，包括一些等待时间已超过3或4小时的机场。国土安全部周二表示，全国11.1%的TSA人员（即3160人）没有上班。

    国土安全部的ICE和其他执法人员在停摆期间获得报酬。

    国土安全部表示，周二，纽约、休斯顿、亚特兰大和新奥尔良的机场有超过30%的TSA工作人员缺勤。

    报道：David Shepardson；编辑：Chizu Nomiyama和Bill Berkrot

    我们的标准：路透社信托原则，[在新标签页打开]

    Long lines reported at major US airports as more TSA officers quit

    By David Shepardson
    March 25, 2026 5:10 PM UTC Updated 1 min ago

    WASHINGTON, March 25 (Reuters) – Long lines were reported at major airports on Wednesday as the Transportation Security Administration said the number of airport security officers quitting had jumped to more than 480 since the mid-February start of a partial government shutdown.

    Ha McNeill, the senior official at the Transportation Security Administration, told a U.S. House committee that the dispute that has forced 50,000 TSA officers to work without pay was leading to major strains and the longest lines in the agency’s history. She reiterated that the TSA could be forced to close smaller airports if staffing issues worsened.

    The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad

    President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he could deploy National Guard troops to airports to address security needs.

    Senate Republicans and Democrats continue to debate a proposal that would allow funding to resume for TSA and other Department of Homeland Security agencies.

    McNeill noted that 1,110 TSA officers quit during the 2025 shutdown.

    TSA is grappling with the school spring break travel surge and experiencing about 5% higher travel volume than last year. Absences have spiked to more than 10% in recent days, which has led to passengers waiting for more than four hours to get through security checkpoints at some airports.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Item 1 of 2 Passengers wait in long TSA lines amid a funding standoff that has forced 50,000 airport security officers to go without pay, causing delays at airports, at the George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Texas, U.S., March 25, 2026. REUTERS/Antranik Tavitian

    [1/2]Passengers wait in long TSA lines amid a funding standoff that has forced 50,000 airport security officers to go without pay, causing delays at airports, at the George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Texas, U.S., March 25, 2026. REUTERS/Antranik Tavitian [Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab]

    McNeill said some TSA agents were “sleeping in their cars at airports to save gas money, selling their blood and plasma, and taking on second and third jobs to make ends meet, all while expected to perform at the highest level when in uniform to protect the traveling public.”

    McNeill expressed concern that if more TSA workers quit it may be hard to handle the major traffic expected during the upcoming soccer World Cup.

    Democrats have held up funding for DHS while demanding a change in rules governing its immigration operations, after agents in Minneapolis shot and killed U.S. citizens Renee Good and Alex Pretti. Republicans have rejected Democratic proposals to fund TSA while negotiating over reforms for how Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents operate.

    Hundreds of U.S. immigration agents and Homeland Security Investigations officers began deploying at 14 U.S. airports on Monday to aid security screening, including at some airports where wait times have topped three or four hours. DHS said on Tuesday 11.1% of TSA officers nationally, or 3,160, did not show up for work.

    ICE and other law enforcement personnel at DHS are getting paid during the shutdown.

    On Tuesday, more than 30% of TSA workers were absent at airports in New York, Houston, Atlanta and New Orleans, DHS said.

    Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Bill Berkrot

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • Meta和谷歌因社交媒体对儿童造成伤害在美国诉讼中败诉


    2026年3月25日 美国东部时间下午4:56 /路透社

    作者：Dawn Chmielewski、Courtney Rozen和Jody Godoy

    节点运行失败

    第1项（共7项）：2026年3月25日，在美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶，亚历山大的母亲艾米·内维尔（Amy Neville）、莱利·巴斯福德的母亲玛丽·罗迪（Mary Rodee）、谢尔比·诺克斯（Shelby Knox）、律师劳拉·马奎斯-加勒特（Laura Marquez-Garrett）、律师伦农·托雷斯（Lennon Torres）以及Heat Initiative的首席执行官莎拉·加德纳（Sarah Gardner）在陪审团裁定Meta和谷歌在一桩关键测试案中负有责任后，在法庭外作出反应。这起案件指控Meta和谷歌旗下的YouTube通过成瘾性社交媒体平台损害儿童心理健康。路透社/迈克·布莱克（Mike Blake）拍摄

    [1/7] 亚历山大的母亲艾米·内维尔、莱利·巴斯福德的母亲玛丽·罗迪、谢尔比·诺克斯、律师劳拉·马奎斯-加勒特、律师伦农·托雷斯以及Heat Initiative的首席执行官莎拉·加德纳在陪审团裁定Meta和谷歌在一桩关键测试案中负有责任后，在法庭外作出反应。这起案件指控Meta和谷歌旗下的YouTube… 阅读更多

    • 摘要
    • 公司
    • 判决可能影响数千起针对科技公司的类似案件
    • 原告聚焦平台设计可能使公司更难避免责任
    • 对儿童安全的批评日益增多，辩论转向法院和州政府
    • Meta正在评估法律选择，谷歌计划上诉

    洛杉矶，3月25日（路透社） – 谷歌母公司Alphabet和Meta周三被裁定设计的平台对儿童和青少年存在危险，这一具有里程碑意义的判决可能迫使科技公司重新考虑如何应对安全指控。

    这一判决可能标志着在社交媒体出现二十多年后，全球对其平台被指对青少年心理健康造成伤害的反弹达到转折点。

    订阅每日新闻通讯《The Daily Docket》，获取最新法律新闻，直接发送到您的收件箱。立即注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续

    报告广告

    陪审团裁定Meta赔偿420万美元，谷歌赔偿180万美元，这对全球最有价值的两家公司而言金额不大。Meta在1月表示，预计2026年资本支出在1150亿至1350亿美元之间。Alphabet同月表示，2026年支出预计在1750亿至1850亿美元之间。

    本案涉及一名20岁女性，她在诉讼开始时还是未成年人，法庭以她的名字“凯莉”（Kaley）指代。她称自己因谷歌旗下YouTube和Meta旗下Instagram的吸睛设计从小就对其上瘾。陪审团认定谷歌和Meta在两款应用的设计上存在疏忽，且未能警示其危险。

    广告 · 滚动继续

    “今天的判决是对整个行业的公投——责任时代已经到来，”原告首席法律顾问在一份声明中表示。

    Meta股价小幅上涨，Alphabet股价略有下跌。

    Meta发言人表示，Meta不同意这一判决，其律师正在“评估我们的法律选择”。谷歌发言人何塞·卡斯塔涅达（José Castañeda）表示，谷歌计划上诉。

    洛杉矶诉讼中的原告聚焦平台设计而非内容，使公司更难避免责任。

    投资公司D.A. Davidson的科技行业分析师吉尔·卢里亚（Gil Luria）表示，这一判决对Meta和谷歌是“挫折”。

    “这一过程可能会在未来的案件和上诉中拖延，但最终可能导致这些公司采取消费者保护措施，可能抑制增长，”他说。

    广告休息即将开始！ 节点运行失败

    NEXT Stay Next Off English 480p Auto (480p)

    关于Connatix V261275333

    关于Connatix V261275333

    1/1 跳过广告

    广告后继续观看！节点运行失败

    访问广告商网站[前往页面]

    Snap和TikTok也在此次诉讼中成为被告。两者在诉讼开始前均与原告达成和解。协议条款未披露。

    日益增多的批评

    过去十年中，美国大型科技公司面临着对儿童和青少年安全的日益增多的批评。这场辩论现在已转向法院和州政府。美国国会未能通过监管社交媒体的全面立法。

    根据追踪州法律的无党派全国州议会会议（National Conference of State Legislatures）称，至少20个州去年颁布了关于社交媒体使用和儿童的法律。

    这些立法包括规范学校手机使用和要求用户验证年龄才能开设社交媒体账户的法案。由Meta和谷歌等科技公司支持的贸易协会NetChoice正在法庭上寻求废除年龄验证要求。

    由多个州和学区对科技公司提起的另一宗社交媒体成瘾案预计将于今年夏天在加利福尼亚州奥克兰联邦法院开庭审理。

    主要原告律师之一马修·伯格曼（Matthew Bergman）表示，另一宗州级审判计划于7月在洛杉矶开始，将涉及Instagram、YouTube、TikTok和Snapchat。

    此外，新墨西哥州陪审团周二裁定Meta违反州法律，该诉讼由该州总检察长提起，指控该公司误导用户关于Facebook、Instagram和WhatsApp的安全性，并允许儿童性剥削在这些平台上发生。

    审判辩论

    在审判中，原告律师试图证明Meta和谷歌故意针对儿童，并作出将利润置于安全之上的决策。Meta律师强调原告童年困难的家庭生活是其心理健康问题的原因，而YouTube则辩称她对该流媒体平台的使用很少。

    陪审员看到了揭示Meta和谷歌如何吸引年轻用户的内部文件，并听取了包括Meta首席执行官马克·扎克伯格（Mark Zuckerberg）在内的高管上月出庭为公司决策辩护的证词。

    当被问及Meta解除一些内部人士警告可能对少女有害的美容滤镜临时禁令的决定时，扎克伯格表示他决定让用户表达自己。

    “我觉得证据不足以支持限制人们的表达，”他说。

    言论自由和内容审核如何影响公司决策，可能在任何上诉中都将发挥作用。

    报道：Dawn Chmielewski（洛杉矶）、Courtney Rozen和Jody Godoy（华盛顿）、Juby Babu（墨西哥城）；补充报道：Katie Paul；编辑：Nia Williams、Rod Nickel

    我们的标准：汤森路透信托原则。

    Meta, Google lose US case over social media harm to kids

    March 25, 2026 4:56 PM UTC / Reuters

    By Dawn Chmielewski, Courtney Rozen and Jody Godoy

    节点运行失败

    Item 1 of 7 Amy Neville, mother of Alexander, Mary Rodee, mother of Riley Basford, Shelby Knox, lawyer Laura Marquez-Garrett, lawyer Lennon Torres and CEO of Heat Initiative Sarah Gardner react outside the court after the jury found Meta and Google liable in a key test case accusing Meta and Google’s YouTube of harming children’s mental health through addictive social media platforms, in Los Angeles, California, U.S., March 25, 2026. REUTERS/Mike Blake

    [1/7]Amy Neville, mother of Alexander, Mary Rodee, mother of Riley Basford, Shelby Knox, lawyer Laura Marquez-Garrett, lawyer Lennon Torres and CEO of Heat Initiative Sarah Gardner react outside the court after the jury found Meta and Google liable in a key test case accusing Meta and Google’s YouTube… Read more

    • Summary
    • Companies
    • Verdict could affect thousands of similar cases against tech companies
    • Plaintiff’s focus on platform design may make liability harder to avert for companies
    • Mounting criticism over child safety shifts debate to courts, state governments
    • Meta evaluating legal options, Google plans to appeal

    LOS ANGELES, March 25 (Reuters) – Alphabet’s Google and Meta were found liable on Wednesday for designing platforms that are dangerous for kids and teens, in a landmark verdict that could force tech firms to rethink how they defend themselves against safety claims.

    The verdict could mark a turning point in the global backlash against their platforms’ perceived mental health harms to youth, more than two decades after the emergence of social media.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad

    The jury found Meta liable for $4.2 million in damages and Google for $1.8 million, small amounts for two of the world’s most valuable companies. Meta said in January it expects its capital spending for 2026 to be between $115 billion and $135 billion. Alphabet said the same month it expects to spend between $175 billion and $185 billion in 2026.

    The case involves a 20-year-old woman, a minor when the case began who is known in court by her first name Kaley. She said she became addicted to Google’s YouTube and Meta’s Instagram at a young age because of their attention-grabbing design. The jury found Google and Meta were negligent in the design of both apps and failed to warn about their dangers.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    “Today’s verdict is a referendum — from a jury, to an entire industry — that accountability has arrived,” the plaintiff’s lead counsel said in a statement.

    Shares of Meta were modestly higher and Alphabet shares were slightly lower.

    Meta disagrees with the verdict and its lawyers are “evaluating our legal options,” a company spokesperson said. Google plans to appeal, said company spokesperson José Castañeda.

    The plaintiff in the Los Angeles proceeding focused on platform design rather than content, making it harder for the companies to avert liability.

    The verdict is a “setback” for Meta and Google, said Gil Luria, a technology sector analyst at investment firm D.A. Davidson.

    “This process will likely get dragged out through future cases and appeals, but eventually may cause these companies to put in consumer safeguards that may dampen growth,” he said.

    Ad Break Coming Up!节点运行失败NEXT Stay Next Off English 480p Auto (480p)About Connatix V261275333 About Connatix V261275333 1/1 Skip Ad Continue watching after the ad!节点运行失败Visit Advertiser website[GO TO PAGE]

    Snap and TikTok were also defendants in the trial. Both settled with the plaintiff before it began. Terms of the agreements were not disclosed.

    MOUNTING CRITICISM

    Large technology companies in the U.S. have faced mounting criticism in the last decade over child and teen safety. The debate has now shifted to courts and state governments. The U.S. Congress has declined to pass comprehensive legislation regulating social media.

    At least 20 states enacted laws last year on social media usage and children, according to the nonpartisan National Conference of State Legislatures, an organization that tracks state laws.

    The legislation includes bills that regulate the use of cellphones in schools and require users to verify their ages to open a social media account. NetChoice, a trade association backed by tech companies such as Meta and Google, is seeking to invalidate age verification requirements in court.

    A separate social media addiction case brought by several states and school districts against technology companies is expected to go to trial this summer in federal court in Oakland, California.

    Another state trial is slated to begin in Los Angeles in July, said Matthew Bergman, one of the attorneys leading the cases for the plaintiffs. It will involve Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and Snapchat.

    Separately, a New Mexico jury on Tuesday found Meta violated state law in a lawsuit brought by the state’s attorney general, who accused the company of misleading users about the safety of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp and of enabling child sexual exploitation on those platforms.

    TRIAL ARGUMENTS

    At trial, the plaintiff’s lawyers sought to show Meta and Google intentionally targeted kids and made decisions that put profit over safety. Meta’s attorneys emphasized the plaintiff’s difficult home life as a child as the cause of her mental health struggles, while YouTube argued her usage of the streaming platform was minimal.

    Jurors saw internal documents revealing how Meta and Google sought to attract younger users, and heard executives, including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, take the stand last month to defend company decisions.

    When asked about Meta’s decision to lift a temporary ban on beauty filters that some inside Meta warned could be harmful to teen girls, Zuckerberg said he decided to let users express themselves.

    “I felt like the evidence wasn’t clear enough to support limiting people’s expression,” he said.

    How free speech and content moderation factored into the companies’ decisions is likely to play a part in any appeal.

    Reporting by Dawn Chmielewski in Los Angeles, Courtney Rozen and Jody Godoy in Washington, Juby Babu in Mexico City; Additional reporting by Katie Paul; Editing by Nia Williams, Rod Nickel

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.