2026-03-12T12:14:46-0400 / CBS新闻
随着美以联军对伊朗的战争已接近两周，能源和股市陷入动荡，CBS新闻询问其记者和编辑，以了解外国首都城市的当地舆论氛围。
特朗普总统表示他打算按自己的时间表尽快结束战争，但伊朗称已准备好进行”长期消耗战”以摧毁全球经济。
以下是国际社会对这场冲突的看法快照。
俄罗斯
上周，莫斯科伊朗大使馆外竖起了一座临时纪念碑。俄罗斯首都居民带着鲜花、蜡烛和毛绒玩具前来，表达对伊朗人民的声援，此前伊朗官员称已有超过1000名平民在美以空袭中丧生。
“太令人悲痛了，这么多孩子死去，简直是不人道的。怎么能这样？”带着鲜花的莫斯科居民娜塔莉亚告诉国家广播公司MIR24，”这么美丽的国家，这么多清真寺，他们怎么能把这一切都摧毁？”
根据亲克里姆林宫的第一频道报道，绝大多数俄罗斯人反对美以对伊朗的行动。
俄罗斯总统普京上周向伊朗总统马苏德·佩泽什基安表示哀悼，此前伊朗最高领袖阿亚图拉·阿里·哈梅内伊遇袭身亡，其子穆贾塔巴随后成为新最高领袖。俄罗斯外交部多次谴责美以行动，称其为”对主权独立的联合国成员国的有预谋、无端武装侵略行为”。
在伊朗大使馆外，在伊朗生活工作多年的莫斯科人塔蒂亚娜·普卢日尼科娃向当地媒体描述伊朗是”最友好、最爱好和平的国家。向所有伊朗人致敬——要坚强”，她补充道，”正常人都不会支持这种卑劣行为，这种非人道攻击。”
作者：斯维特拉娜·贝尔德尼科娃
德国
战争初期，德国媒体头条大多报道了约3万名德国公民被困在阿联酋和其他海湾国家，以及航空公司取消数千架航班的消息。
“凌晨12点半左右，我们突然听到警报声”，游客理查德·格鲁特穆勒上周在酒店阳台上对《明镜周刊》说，”我们告诉孩子们那只是雷声。”
“这非常超现实，”勒内·伦布克在迪拜机场等了12小时却没等到航班，他对杂志说，”我们现在身处度假天堂……随时可能出事……这就是你感受到的不确定性。”
在国内，德国人似乎越来越担心战争的广泛影响。公共广播公司ARD上周的”德国趋势”民调显示，超过一半受访者认为这场战争不合理，四分之三的人担心冲突会蔓延到其他国家。
近九成德国人表示，国际政治正越来越受”强者法则”支配。
作者：安娜·诺里斯基维茨
波兰
自战争爆发以来，波兰民众明显感到不安。上周在华沙一条繁忙的街道上，路人接受了波兰新闻网站WP的简短采访。
“我很害怕，”一位老妇人说，”战争容易开始，但难以结束。”
“我认为这场战争本可以避免，”一位二十出头的女子表示，”我理解改变伊朗政权的目标，但现在这么多国家都受到这场战争的影响——甚至塞浦路斯。”
更广泛的欧洲民调也显示，民众对美国政策的不安情绪上升：在包括波兰在内的欧洲六个主要国家中，约五分之一的受访者称美国现在是对其安全的”主要威胁”。
对一些波兰人来说，伊朗战争加剧了他们的担忧，因为他们担心这会影响持续四年的家门口冲突——即俄罗斯对乌克兰的战争。
作者：安娜·诺里斯基维茨
乌克兰
在乌克兰社交媒体上，一张AI生成的照片显示总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基手持黑桃A，照片中心是一架无人机，在过去几周获得了数千个赞。
应美国国防部请求，乌克兰周末向约旦派遣了无人机拦截器和飞行员，以协助保卫美国在该地区的军事基地。华盛顿的求助让许多乌克兰人回想起一年前的椭圆形办公室对峙：特朗普告诉泽连斯基他”没有牌可打”，副总统JD·万斯则问乌克兰总统是否会”感谢美国”。
“看来我们现在有牌了，”一位基辅的士兵告诉CBS新闻，还说现在在等万斯感谢乌克兰。
但对乌克兰防空专业能力的默许认可带来的满足感，却因中东西方拦截器库存减少而有所降温——许多乌克兰人曾希望这些物资最终能运往基辅。
乌克兰人憎恨伊朗政权向俄罗斯提供无人机，这些无人机四年来已造成数千乌克兰人死亡。他们希望伊朗和俄罗斯政府倒台，但也有人担心美国将重心放在中东战争，而减少对俄罗斯施压和对乌克兰的援助。
“一个自由民主的伊朗是乌克兰的梦想，”乌克兰议会议员奥列格·敦达告诉CBS新闻，”如果伊朗加入国际秩序，油价会下跌，削弱俄罗斯预算，导致运往乌克兰的无人机和导弹减少。”
“但我确实看到当前局势对乌克兰有很多风险，”他补充道，”如果美国资源消耗在波斯湾，那么保卫北约东翼的资源就会减少。只要油价继续上涨，俄罗斯就会用这笔钱购买火箭弹和无人机打击乌克兰。”
作者：艾登·斯特雷奇
英国
美以对伊朗的打击引发了英国对英美”特殊关系”的严重质疑。
工党领袖基尔·斯塔默曾因成功与特朗普建立良好关系而受到赞誉，而特朗普与其他欧洲领导人的矛盾日益加剧。但当英国拒绝美国使用其基地对伊朗发动进攻性打击时，特朗普抨击斯塔默，引发英国议员就首相是否为英国国家利益做出正确决定展开辩论。
“我们面对的不是丘吉尔，”特朗普嘲讽道。
斯塔默的一些批评者（主要是英国右翼政治人士）认为，与美国保持良好关系应是首要任务，但斯塔默坚持英国希望通过谈判解决伊朗核问题，并继续呼吁战争降级。
斯塔默似乎得到大多数英国选民支持，民调显示多数英国人反对美以对伊朗的袭击，并认为军事行动理由”不明确”。
英国允许美国使用其基地进行”防御性行动”，并已迟滞地派遣一艘军舰前往塞浦路斯水域，以保护英国空军基地。”但在建立这种关系所付出的所有努力之后，”英国广播公司政治编辑克里斯·梅森上周写道，”它从未像现在这样处于如此艰难的境地。”
作者：海莉·奥特
爱尔兰
在爱尔兰共和国，美国在中东的又一次军事干预引起了极大不满，重启了关于美军使用爱尔兰香农机场作为加油基地的数十年争议。
“大多数爱尔兰人认为这场战争鲁莽且非法，”爱尔兰最著名政治评论员芬坦·奥图尔本周告诉CBS新闻，”很难找到相信伊朗对美国构成迫在眉睫威胁的人，也没人确切知道预期的最终结局是什么。”
“以色列对加沙的战争在爱尔兰极不受欢迎，现在对伊朗和黎巴嫩的袭击似乎是其延伸。当然，普通民众受到燃料价格飙升的严重影响，看不到任何积极结果。”他补充道。
爱尔兰政府一直强烈批评以色列在加沙的军事行动，都柏林支持南非在国际法院对以色列提起的诉讼，指控以色列在巴勒斯坦领土实施种族灭绝。
爱尔兰总统凯瑟琳·康诺利周日表示，爱尔兰不能忽视”违反联合国宪章的灾难性后果”，并补充说”我们目睹的国际法违反行为令人震惊和麻木”。
一些左翼反对党议员最近呼吁爱尔兰政府禁止美军使用自1945年启用的香农机场作为跨大西洋加油点。
作者：埃米特·莱昂斯
印度
德黑兰驻新德里大使馆内摆放着一张铺着黑布的长桌，桌上有一本翻开的书，墙上挂着已故伊朗最高领袖阿亚图拉·阿里·哈梅内伊的肖像。
“我写下了我的感受，”来自北方邦的教师拉扎告诉《印度快报》，”我深感悲痛。”
“印度与伊朗革命有着深厚联系，”印度穆斯林政治委员会主席塔斯利姆·艾哈迈德·雷汉尼在吊唁簿上写道。1979年伊朗君主制被推翻时，他正在读高中，当时的神权政体至今仍统治着该国。
63岁的雷汉尼称哈梅内伊在美以空袭开始时遇袭身亡是”对伊朗的侮辱”，并补充说”我强烈谴责”。
对伊朗的打击在印度多个地区引发抗议，包括穆斯林占多数的克什米尔地区，以及勒克瑙和兰契等城市。抗议者举着哈梅内伊和伊朗国旗的海报，高呼反对美以的口号，焚烧特朗普和内塔尼亚胡的肖像。
许多印度人将特朗普视为类似”准最高领袖”的人物，认为他只是出于本国利益与印度接触。印度政府的含糊其辞加剧了民众对战争的愤怒，最终导致政府禁止反美以抗议。
莫迪政府发布了措辞微妙、谨慎的”关切”声明，但未直接谴责。
在哈梅内伊遇袭四天后，印度外长才签署伊朗大使馆的吊唁簿。
“印度在重大问题上的沉默是一贯模式，”曾担任国家安全顾问和外交秘书，并代表印度驻以色列等多国担任大使的希夫·尚卡尔·梅农周二对印度电视台表示，”我们对俄罗斯入侵乌克兰保持沉默，没有称之为入侵；我们对加沙大屠杀保持沉默，现在对美以侵略伊朗保持沉默。如果你一直沉默，你的声音就会减弱……世界会停止倾听你。”
作者：阿尔沙德·扎尔加
西班牙
“西班牙政府的立场可以用四个字概括：No a la guerra（不支持战争），”西班牙首相佩德罗·桑切斯上周四表示，翻译成英文只有三个字：”No to war（反对战争）”。
欧盟第四大经济体拒绝让美国使用其南部莫龙和罗塔的联合基地对伊朗发动进攻后，特朗普威胁要”切断与西班牙的所有贸易”，桑切斯拒绝退缩，这反映了大多数西班牙人的观点——根据《国家报》委托的民调，三分之二的西班牙人反对这场战争。
桑切斯的立场可能有助于缓解2003年西班牙民众的愤怒——当时右翼首相何塞·玛丽亚·阿斯纳尔不顾90%民众反对，支持美国领导的伊拉克战争。
西班牙与以色列（美伊战争的伙伴）的关系近期也恶化。周二，西班牙撤回驻以色列大使，正式终止外交关系，因两国外交争端升级。西班牙强烈反对以色列在加沙的战争，并于9月暂时召回驻以色列大使，禁止载有武器的船只和飞机使用其港口或领空。
“保护国家和社会是一回事；轰炸医院和饿死儿童是另一回事，”桑切斯强调西班牙有责任停止联合国特别报告员和许多专家认为的”种族灭绝”行为。
作者：弗兰克·安德鲁斯
法国
法国总统埃马纽埃尔·马克龙将自己定位为调解人，提出帮助缓和伊朗战争。
上周，他与特朗普和伊朗总统马苏德·佩泽什基安通话，呼吁伊朗停止对波斯湾国家的打击，并重新开放霍尔木兹海峡的航运。
他反复强调外交是结束战争的唯一途径，尽管在周日晚间的全国电视讲话中批评德黑兰挑起冲突，但他仍指出美以袭击”违反国际法”，巴黎无法”批准”。
在伊朗打击英国在塞浦路斯的主权空军基地后，马克龙命令法国”戴高乐”号航母前往东地中海，但他反复强调法国的立场完全是防御性的。
“塞浦路斯遭攻击即欧洲遭攻击，”他补充说，法国希望”为地区降级贡献力量”。
法国公众舆论一贯反对对外军事干预，自2003年伊拉克战争以来一直如此。以色列在加沙的战争也遭到法国民众广泛反对，当前对伊朗的战争似乎更不受欢迎。
如果调查显示，大多数法国人对伊朗政权表示担忧，但只有四分之一的人认为法国应该参战。然而，Elabe智库最近的另一项民调显示，略多数（55%）支持法国进行军事干预以重新开放霍尔木兹海峡，作为国际”防御性”护航商船行动的一部分。
作者：弗兰克·安德鲁斯和卡琳·巴泽加尔
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9ZLPu7s0sg
How do other countries view the U.S. and Israel’s war with Iran?
2026-03-12T12:14:46-0400 / CBS News
CBS News asked its reporters and editors to gauge the local mood in foreign capital cities as the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran, now nearing the two-week mark, leaves energy and stock markets in turmoil.
President Trump has said he intends to end the war soon, on his own timetable. But Iran says it’s prepared for a “long-term war of attrition” to destroy the global economy.
Below is a snapshot of international opinions and viewpoints on the conflict.
*
Russia
A makeshift memorial was erected outside the Iranian embassy in Moscow last week. Residents of the Russian capital brought flowers, candles, and stuffed animals to express their solidarity with the Iranian people as Iranian officials said over 1,000 civilians had been killed by the U.S.-Israeli strikes.
“It’s so sad, so many children died, it’s simply inhumane. How can this be?” Natalia, a Moscovite who brought flowers, told state broadcaster MIR24. “Such a beautiful country, such mosques, how can they destroy it all?”
The overwhelming majority of Russians disapprove of the American-Israeli operation against Iran, at least according to Russia’s pro-Kremlin Channel 1.
Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed his condolences last week to his Iranian counterpart, President Masoud Pezeshkian, over the killing of former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, whose son Mojtaba has since become the new supreme leader. The Russian Foreign Ministry has repeatedly condemned the U.S.-Israeli campaign, calling it a “pre-planned and unprovoked act of armed aggression against a sovereign and independent UN member state.”
Outside the Iranian embassy, Tatiana Pluzhnikova, a Moscovite who said she had lived and worked in Iran for years, described it to local media as “the friendliest, most peace-loving country. To all Iranians — be strong,” she added.
“No normal person could support such vile acts, such inhuman attacks.”
By Svetlana Berdnikova
Germany
In the first days of the war, headlines in Germany were dominated by reports of as many as 30,000 German nationals being stranded in the United Arab Emirates and other Gulf countries as airlines canceled thousands of flights.
“Around half past midnight we suddenly heard sirens,” tourist Richard Grüttmöller told Der Spiegel last week, speaking from his hotel balcony. “We told the kids it was just thunder.”
“It’s very surreal,” René Lembke, who waited 12 hours in Dubai airport for a flight that never took off, told the magazine: “We’re here in a holiday paradise. … Something could happen at any moment … that’s the uncertainty you feel.”
At home, Germans have seemed increasingly concerned about the wider implications of the war. A “DeutschlandTrend” survey by public broadcaster ARD last week found that over half of respondents believed the war was unjustified, while three quarters voiced fear the conflict would spread to other countries.
Nearly nine in 10 Germans said international politics was increasingly shaped by the “law of the strongest.”
By Anna Noryskiewicz
Poland
Poles have been palpably uneasy since the war began. On a busy city street, passers-by stopped briefly for interviews last week with Polish news website WP.
“I’m afraid,” said one elderly woman. “Wars are easy to start but hard to end.”
“I think the war should have been prevented,” said a woman in her early 20s. “I understand the goal of a regime change in Iran, but now so many countries are affected by this war — even Cyprus.”
Broader European polling has also shown rising unease about U.S. policy: Around one in five respondents in Europe’s six largest countries — including Poland — said they now viewed the United States as a “major threat” to their security.
For some Poles, those concerns have been exacerbated by the Iran war, as they fear it could impact the conflict raging on their doorstep for four years already — the one they remain most worried about, Russia’s war on Ukraine.
By Anna Noryskiewicz
Ukraine
On Ukrainian social media feeds, an AI-generated photo of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy holding an ace of spades with a drone at the center of the playing card has received thousands of likes over the last couple weeks.
Following a request from the U.S. Defense Department, Ukraine sent drone interceptors and pilots to Jordan over the weekend to help defend U.S. military bases from Iranian drones. The plea for help from Washington led many Ukrainians to recall the Oval Office show-down a year earlier, when President Trump told Zelenskyy he had “no cards” to play, and Vice President JD Vance asked if the Ukrainian president would ever “say thank you” to the U.S.
“It seems like we have the cards now,” one soldier based in Kyiv told CBS News, adding that he was now waiting for Vance to thank Ukraine.
But satisfaction over the tacit recognition of Ukraine’s air defense expertise has been tempered by dwindling Western interceptor stockpiles in the Middle East — supplies that many in Ukraine had hoped might eventually make their way to Kyiv.
Ukrainians hate the Iranian regime for supplying Russia with drones that have killed Ukrainians for four years. They would love to see the governments of both Iran and Russia fall, but some are concerned that the U.S. is focusing on the war in the Middle East at the expense of pressuring Russia and helping Ukraine.
“A free democratic Iran is a dream for Ukraine,” Ukrainian parliamentarian Oleg Dunda told CBS News. “If Iran joins the international order, oil prices would drop, undermining Russia’s budget and leading to fewer drones and missiles being sent into Ukraine.”
“I do see a lot of risks for Ukraine in the current situation with Iran,” he added. “If American resources are expended in the Persian Gulf, there will be less to defend NATO’s eastern flank. And as long as oil prices continue to rise, Russia will use that money on rockets and drones for Ukraine.”
By Aidan Stretch
United Kingdom
The U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran have prompted serious questions here about the “special relationship” between the U.K. and U.S.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer had been seen as achieving a degree of success in fostering a positive relationship with President Trump as the U.S. leader had more contentious exchanges with other European leaders.
But when the U.K. declined U.S. requests to use its bases for offensive strikes against Iran, Mr. Trump lashed out at Starmer, triggering debate among lawmakers here about whether the prime minister had made the right decision for Britain’s national interests.
“This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with,” Mr. Trump said, mocking Starmer.
Some of Starmer’s critics — predominantly on the right wing of British politics — argue that maintaining a positive relationship with the U.S. should be the priority, but Starmer has stuck by his position that the U.K. prefers a negotiated settlement to the nuclear issue in Iran, and he has continued to urge a deescalation of the war.
Strarmer appears to have the backing of most British voters, with a majority of Britons telling the pollster YouGov that they do not support the U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran and calling the justification for the strikes “unclear.”
The U.K. is allowing the U.S. to use its bases for what it deems to be defensive operations and is belatedly sending a warship to Cypriot waters to protect a British air force base, “But after all the effort invested into building up this relationship,” the BBC’s political editor Chris Mason wrote last week, “it has never been in a rockier place than it is now.”
By Haley Ott
Ireland
In the Republic of Ireland, another American military intervention in the Middle East has proven deeply unpopular, reviving a decades-long debate over the U.S. military’s use of Ireland’s Shannon airport as a refueling base.
“Most people in Ireland view the war as reckless and illegal,” Fintan O’Toole, one of Ireland’s most prominent political commentators, told CBS News this week. “It is hard to find anyone who believes that Iran posed an imminent threat to the U.S. or who understands exactly what the envisaged endgame is.”
“Israel’s war on Gaza has been deeply unpopular in Ireland and these attacks on Iran and Lebanon seem like an extension of it. Also, of course ordinary people have been badly affected by the immediate rise in fuel prices and don’t see anything good happening as a consequence,” he said.
The Irish government has been a vocal critic of the Israeli military campaign in Gaza and Dublin backed South Africa’s legal proceedings against Israel at the International Court of Justice, accusing Israel of committing genocide in the Palestinian territory.
Ireland’s President Catherine Connolly said Sunday that Ireland could not ignore the “catastrophic consequences of violating the U.N. charter,” with respect to the U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran, adding that “the violations of international law we are witnessing are shocking and numbing.”
Some left-wing opposition politicians have recently called on the Irish government to ban the U.S. military from using Shannon airport, which has been a convenient transatlantic refuelling stop since it opened in 1945.
By Emmet Lyons
India
Inside the Iranian Embassy in New Delhi stands a long table draped in black cloth. On it lies an open book, overlooked by a portrait on the wall of the late Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
“I wrote what I was feeling,” Raza, a teacher from Uttar Pradesh, told The Indian Express. “I am deeply saddened.”
India has “a deep connection with the Iranian revolution,” Taslim Ahmed Rehmani, president of the Muslim Political Council of India, wrote in the condolence book. He was in his last year of high school in 1979 when Iran’s monarchy was overthrown by the Islamic theocracy that continues to rule over the country.
Rehmani, 63, called Khamenei’s killing in the opening hours of the U.S.-Israeli assault “an insult to Iran,” adding: “I condemn it.”
The strikes on Iran sparked protests in several parts of India, including the Muslim-majority region of Kashmir and the cities of Lucknow and Ranchi. Protesters held up posters of Khamenei and Iranian flags, and chanted against the U.S. and Israel, burning effigies of President Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Many Indians have come to see Mr. Trump as a sort of would-be supreme leader himself, engaging with India only in the interest of his own country. Their indignation over the war has been exacerbated by the equivocations of India’s government, which eventually banned the anti-U.S.-Israel protests.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration has released nuanced, guarded statements of “concern” about the war, but has not condemned it.
It took four days of mounting domestic political pressure after Khamenei was killed for India’s Foreign Minister to sign the condolence book at the Iranian embassy.
“India’s silence on big issues has been a consistent pattern,” Shiv Shankar Menon, India’s former National Security Adviser and Foreign Secretary, who also served as an ambassador to several countries, including Israel, told Indian television on Tuesday.
“We stayed silent on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and did not call it an invasion. We stayed silent on the slaughter in Gaza, now on the U.S.-Israel aggression in Iran,” he said. “If you stay silent all the time, you diminish your voice … the world stops listening to you.”
By Arshad Zargar
Spain
“The position of the Spanish government can be summed up in four words,” Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said last Thursday. “No a la guerra.”
In English, it’s only three words: No to war.
Sanchez spoke after President Trump threatened to “cut off all trade with Spain,” following the European Union’s fourth largest economy refusing to let the U.S. use jointly-run bases in Morón and Rota, in Spain’s south, to attack Iran.
“Spain has been terrible,” Mr. Trump said. “We don’t want anything to do with Spain.”
Sanchez’s refusal to back down reflects the views of most Spaniards, two thirds of whom oppose the war, according to a poll commissioned by the major newspaper El Pais.
His stance may help to heal the betrayal many in the country felt when, in 2003, then-conservative Prime Minister José María Aznar backed the U.S.-led war in Iraq despite polls at the time showing around 90% of the population opposed the move, and as millions protested across the country against it.
Spain’s relations with Israel, the U.S.’ partner in the war on Iran, have been no better of late.
On Tuesday, Spain withdrew its ambassador to Israel, officially terminating the position as the diplomatic spat between the two countries deepened. Spain strongly opposed Israel’s war in the Gaza Strip and, in September, it temporarily recalled its ambassador to Israel and banned ships and planes carrying weapons for Israel from using its ports or airspace.
“Protecting your country and your society is one thing; bombing hospitals and starving children is another,” said Sanchez at the time, emphasising Spain’s responsibility to try to stop what he noted “the U.N. special rapporteur and many experts consider a genocide.”
By Frank Andrews
France
France’s President Emmanuel Macron has positioned himself as a negotiator, offering to help deescalate the war in Iran.
Over the last week he has spoken with both President Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, urging Iran to stop its strikes on Persian Gulf countries and to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to shipping traffic.
He has continually stressed diplomacy as the only way to end the war, and while blaming Tehran for the current conflict during a national televised address last week, he also described the U.S.-Israeli strikes as “outside international law,” saying Paris could not “approve of them.”
Macron ordered the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle to the eastern Mediterranean after Iranian strikes targeted the British sovereign air base on the island of Cyprus, but he has repeatedly stressed that France’s posture is entirely defensive.
“When Cyprus is attacked, Europe is attacked” he said, adding that France wanted to “contribute to regional deescalation.”
French public opinion is predominantly against any foreign military interventions and has been since the 2003 Iraq war. Israel’s war in Gaza was widely disapproved of by the French population, and the current war in Iran doesn’t seem any more popular.
While a large majority of the French say they’re concerned about the regime in Iran, only one in four believe France should join the war, according to a poll by Ifop.
Another poll conducted recently by the Elabe think tank showed, however, that a small majority (55%) said they were in favor of a French military intervention specifically to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, as part of an international “defensive” mission to escort commercial ships.
By Frank Andrews and Karine Barzegar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9ZLPu7s0sg