分类: 未分类

  • 阿富汗称巴基斯坦空袭一戒毒所 酿400人死250伤


    发布时间:2026年3月17日 10:17 / 来源:联合早报

    阿富汗塔利班政府星期二称,巴基斯坦周一对阿富汗喀布尔一所戒毒康复医院发动恐袭,造成400人死亡、250人受伤。 (法新社)

    阿富汗塔利班政府星期二称,巴基斯坦对阿富汗一家戒毒康复医院发动空袭,造成400人死亡、250人受伤。

    路透社引述塔利班政府副发言人报道称,位于喀布尔一所为吸毒者提供康复治疗的医院星期一(3月16日)遭巴基斯坦空袭,造成400人死亡、250人受伤。

    巴基斯坦否认了这一“虚假且具有误导性”的说法。

    巴基斯坦新闻与广播部部长塔拉尔在社媒X上发文说,巴基斯坦军队星期一晚间对位于阿富汗首都喀布尔和阿东部楠格哈尔省的军事设施等目标发动空袭,并实施了精准打击。

    他声称,袭击目标包括弹药库和技术基础设施,并指责塔利班政府发表了“虚假声明”。

    阿富汗称巴基斯坦空袭一戒毒所 酿400人死250伤

    发布时间:2026年3月17日 10:17 / 来源:联合早报

    阿富汗塔利班政府星期二称,巴基斯坦周一对阿富汗喀布尔一所戒毒康复医院发动恐袭,造成400人死亡、250人受伤。 (法新社)

    阿富汗塔利班政府星期二称,巴基斯坦对阿富汗一家戒毒康复医院发动空袭,造成400人死亡、250人受伤。

    路透社引述塔利班政府副发言人报道称,位于喀布尔一所为吸毒者提供康复治疗的医院星期一(3月16日)遭巴基斯坦空袭,造成400人死亡、250人受伤。

    巴基斯坦否认了这一“虚假且具有误导性”的说法。

    巴基斯坦新闻与广播部部长塔拉尔在社媒X上发文说,巴基斯坦军队星期一晚间对位于阿富汗首都喀布尔和阿东部楠格哈尔省的军事设施等目标发动空袭,并实施了精准打击。

    他声称,袭击目标包括弹药库和技术基础设施,并指责塔利班政府发表了“虚假声明”。

  • 被控国会山管道炸弹袭击者称特朗普赦免令应驳回其指控


    更新于:2026年3月16日 / 美国东部时间晚上11:33 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    一名被指控在2021年1月6日国会山骚乱前夕于共和党全国委员会和民主党全国委员会总部外放置管道炸弹的男子,要求法官驳回对他的刑事指控,称其行为受特朗普总统对所谓1月6日骚乱者的全面赦免令保护。

    小布赖恩·科尔(Brian Cole Jr.)的律师周一提交的动议,是这起多年悬而未决案件的最新转折——也是对1月6日赦免令适用范围的最新考验。

    他的律师辩称,对已否认有罪的科尔提出的指控”与1月6日事件有着密不可分且确凿的联系”。

    他们指出,检察官的文件显示科尔告诉联邦调查局,他前往华盛顿特区是为了参加2020年与选举相关的抗议活动,这表明他是”引发1月6日人群骚乱的同一政治争议的一部分”。他们还指出,尽管炸弹据称在1月5日被放置,但直到次日下午才被发现。

    “无论喜欢与否,这份赦免令适用于科尔先生,”科尔的律师写道,”基于赦免令措辞的普通明确含义及其在本案相关事实中的应用。”

    在联邦当局近五年未能确定嫌疑人后,科尔于去年年底被指控犯有跨州运输爆炸物和恶意使用爆炸物未遂罪。炸弹未爆炸,但联邦调查局称其具有杀伤力。特朗普政府官员曾将侦破此案列为优先事项。

    哥伦比亚广播公司新闻已联系司法部请求置评。

    去年特朗普重返白宫数小时后发布的1月6日赦免令,为约1500名骚乱被告提供了救济,他们被指控从非法侵入到袭击警察等各种罪名。总统赦免了除14名因1月6日相关罪行被定罪者外的所有人,并指示司法部对尚未被定罪者寻求驳回指控。

    目前尚不清楚特朗普的赦免令是否适用于科尔。该命令称赦免令适用于”与2021年1月6日在美国国会大厦或附近发生的事件相关的罪行”——而科尔被指控在事件发生前一天放置炸弹。

    科尔的律师辩称,”相关”一词可适用于2021年1月6日当天未发生但与该日事件相关的罪行。

    这并非首个考验1月6日赦免令适用范围的刑事案件。

    在多起案件中,当局搜查了1月6日被告的住所,据称发现非法枪支,导致这些被指控的骚乱者面临1月6日相关指控和武器持有指控。政府在部分案件中辩称,特朗普先生的赦免令应涵盖其所有指控,而非仅与国会山骚乱直接相关的指控。一名被告获得第二次赦免以涵盖其枪支指控。

    另一名骚乱者爱德华·凯利(Edward Kelley)被单独指控在1月6日进入国会大厦并威胁调查他的联邦调查局特工。在他的案件中,联邦检察官辩称特朗普的赦免令不涵盖针对联邦调查局的威胁相关指控,驳回了凯利的驳回动议。他被判处终身监禁。

    纽约库德曼·特拉克滕·阿洛·波斯纳律师事务所合伙人、前联邦检察官米切尔·埃普纳(Mitchell Epner)表示,科尔的所谓行为有可能被特朗普的1月6日全面赦免令涵盖。他称这是”唐纳德·特朗普对法治无情攻击的意外后果”。

    “当你试图让刑事定罪取决于个人一时兴起,并将其转化为法律条文时,很可能会处理得非常糟糕,”埃普纳告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻。

    Alleged Capitol Hill pipe bomber argues charges should be tossed out under Trump pardons

    Updated on: March 16, 2026 / 11:33 PM EDT / CBS News

    A man who was accused of planting pipe bombs outside the Republican National Committee and Democratic National Committee headquarters on the eve of the Jan. 6 attack in 2021 is asking a judge to dismiss the criminal charges against him, arguing he is covered by President Trump’s sweeping pardons of alleged Jan. 6 rioters.

    Monday’s motion from lawyers for Brian Cole Jr. marks the latest twist in a case that remained unsolved for years — and the latest test of how extensively the Jan. 6 pardons could apply.

    His attorneys argued that the charges against Cole, who has pleaded not guilty, are “inextricably and demonstrably tethered” to the events of Jan. 6.

    They pointed to filings by prosecutors that say Cole told the FBI he had traveled to Washington, D.C., to attend a 2020 election-related protest, which suggests he was part of “the same political controversy that animated the January 6 crowd.” And they note that, even though the bombs were allegedly planted on Jan. 5, they were discovered on the following afternoon.

    “The Pardon—like it or not—applies to Mr. Cole, based on the ordinary and plain meaning of the Pardon’s language as applied to the relevant facts in this case,” Cole’s lawyers wrote.

    Cole was charged late last year with interstate transportation of explosives and malicious attempt to use explosives, after federal authorities were unable to identify a suspect in the case for almost five years. The bombs did not detonate, but the FBI has said they were viable. Trump administration officials had described solving the case as a top priority.

    CBS News has reached out to the Justice Department for comment.

    The Jan. 6 pardons, issued hours after Mr. Trump returned to the White House last year, granted relief to around 1,500 riot defendants who were accused of everything from trespassing to assaulting police. The president wiped away criminal convictions for all but 14 of those who were convicted of Jan. 6-related offenses, and directed the Justice Department to seek to dismiss charges against those who had not yet been convicted.

    It’s not clear whether Mr. Trump’s pardon order applies to Cole. The order says the pardons apply to “offenses related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021” — and Cole is accused of planting the bombs one day beforehand.

    Cole’s lawyers argue that the phrase “related to” could apply to offenses that did not take place on Jan. 6, 2021, as long as they were linked to the events of that day.

    This isn’t the first criminal case that has tested the limits of the Jan. 6 pardons.

    In several cases, authorities searched the homes of Jan. 6 defendants and allegedly found unlawful firearms, leading the accused rioters to face both Jan. 6 and weapons possession charges. The government has argued in some of those cases that the pardons issued by Mr. Trump should cover all charges against them, not just the ones directly tied to the Capitol riot. One defendant was granted a second pardon to cover his gun charges.

    Another rioter, Edward Kelley, was charged separately with both entering the Capitol on Jan. 6 and threatening the FBI agents who investigated him. In his case, federal prosecutors argued Mr. Trump’s pardon did not cover the charges related to threats against the FBI, pushing back on Kelley’s motion to dismiss. He was sentenced to life in prison.

    Mitchell Epner, a partner at the New York law firm Kudman Trachten Aloe Posner and former federal prosecutor, says it is possible that Cole’s alleged conduct was covered by Mr. Trump’s Jan. 6 sweeping pardons. He called it an “unintended consequence of Donald Trump’s unrelenting attack upon the rule of law.”

    “When you try to have criminal guilt turn on your whim and you have to convert it into words, it’s possible to do it very badly,” Epner told CBS News.

  • 黎巴嫩媒体:以色列对贝鲁特多地发动空袭击中民宅 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年3月17日 11:52

    黎巴嫩官方数据显示,自3月2日以来,以色列对黎巴嫩的持续袭击已造成886人死亡,逾100万人流离失所。图为在黎巴嫩贝鲁特的临时避难所。 (路透社)

    黎巴嫩媒体星期二称,以色列连夜对黎巴嫩贝鲁特三个街区发动空袭,击中了一栋居民楼。

    法新社引述黎巴嫩国家通讯社报道称:“黎明时分,南部城镇遭到了一系列空袭和炮击。”

    “以色列战机对卡法特和哈雷特·赫里克(Haret Hreik)地区发动了两次空袭。在另一次空袭中,击中了位于多哈阿拉蒙区(Doha Aramoun)威尼斯街尽头一处住宅楼的高层。”

    新华社报道,黎巴嫩卫生部星期一(3月16日)发布的数据显示,以色列国防军当天对黎巴嫩多地发动空袭,造成至少36人死亡、36人受伤。自3月2日以来,以色列对黎巴嫩的持续袭击已造成886人死亡,2141人受伤。

    黎巴嫩最新官方数据显示,因战事流离失所的黎方人数已超100万人。

    黎巴嫩媒体:以色列对贝鲁特多地发动空袭击中民宅 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年3月17日 11:52

    黎巴嫩官方数据显示,自3月2日以来,以色列对黎巴嫩的持续袭击已造成886人死亡,逾100万人流离失所。图为在黎巴嫩贝鲁特的临时避难所。 (路透社)

    黎巴嫩媒体星期二称,以色列连夜对黎巴嫩贝鲁特三个街区发动空袭,击中了一栋居民楼。

    法新社引述黎巴嫩国家通讯社报道称:“黎明时分,南部城镇遭到了一系列空袭和炮击。”

    “以色列战机对卡法特和哈雷特·赫里克(Haret Hreik)地区发动了两次空袭。在另一次空袭中,击中了位于多哈阿拉蒙区(Doha Aramoun)威尼斯街尽头一处住宅楼的高层。”

    新华社报道,黎巴嫩卫生部星期一(3月16日)发布的数据显示,以色列国防军当天对黎巴嫩多地发动空袭,造成至少36人死亡、36人受伤。自3月2日以来,以色列对黎巴嫩的持续袭击已造成886人死亡,2141人受伤。

    黎巴嫩最新官方数据显示,因战事流离失所的黎方人数已超100万人。

  • 黎巴嫩媒体:以色列对贝鲁特多地发动空袭击中民宅


    2026年3月17日 11:52 / 联合早报

    黎巴嫩官方数据显示,自3月2日以来,以色列对黎巴嫩的持续袭击已造成886人死亡,逾100万人流离失所。图为在黎巴嫩贝鲁特的临时避难所。 (路透社)

    黎巴嫩媒体星期二称,以色列连夜对黎巴嫩贝鲁特三个街区发动空袭,击中了一栋居民楼。

    法新社引述黎巴嫩国家通讯社报道称:“黎明时分,南部城镇遭到了一系列空袭和炮击。”

    “以色列战机对卡法特和哈雷特·赫里克(Haret Hreik)地区发动了两次空袭。在另一次空袭中,击中了位于多哈阿拉蒙区(Doha Aramoun)威尼斯街尽头一处住宅楼的高层。”

    新华社报道,黎巴嫩卫生部星期一(3月16日)发布的数据显示,以色列国防军当天对黎巴嫩多地发动空袭,造成至少36人死亡、36人受伤。自3月2日以来,以色列对黎巴嫩的持续袭击已造成886人死亡,2141人受伤。

    黎巴嫩最新官方数据显示,因战事流离失所的黎方人数已超100万人。

    黎巴嫩媒体:以色列对贝鲁特多地发动空袭击中民宅

    2026年3月17日 11:52 / 联合早报

    黎巴嫩官方数据显示,自3月2日以来,以色列对黎巴嫩的持续袭击已造成886人死亡,逾100万人流离失所。图为在黎巴嫩贝鲁特的临时避难所。 (路透社)

    黎巴嫩媒体星期二称,以色列连夜对黎巴嫩贝鲁特三个街区发动空袭,击中了一栋居民楼。

    法新社引述黎巴嫩国家通讯社报道称:“黎明时分,南部城镇遭到了一系列空袭和炮击。”

    “以色列战机对卡法特和哈雷特·赫里克(Haret Hreik)地区发动了两次空袭。在另一次空袭中,击中了位于多哈阿拉蒙区(Doha Aramoun)威尼斯街尽头一处住宅楼的高层。”

    新华社报道,黎巴嫩卫生部星期一(3月16日)发布的数据显示,以色列国防军当天对黎巴嫩多地发动空袭,造成至少36人死亡、36人受伤。自3月2日以来,以色列对黎巴嫩的持续袭击已造成886人死亡,2141人受伤。

    黎巴嫩最新官方数据显示,因战事流离失所的黎方人数已超100万人。

  • 特朗普总统警告:除非国会通过《拯救美国法案》,否则他不会签署其他法案


    福克斯新闻首席国会记者查德·佩格拉姆在《福克斯报道》中报道了政府部分停摆进入第二个月,国会议员们就资金问题展开激烈争论。

    NEW 你现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

    [收听本文]

    7分钟

    国会共和党人多次强调,在未来几天通过《拯救美国法案》至关重要。该法案要求投票时提供公民身份证明。

    “我们需要让在美国投票变得容易,同时让作弊变得困难,”俄亥俄州共和党参议员乔恩·哈斯特德表示。

    “《拯救美国法案》是一项重要法案,”佛罗里达州共和党参议员里克·斯科特在福克斯新闻中表示,“所以我们必须想办法通过它。”

    [特朗普支持的选民身份法案面临共和党内部阻力,蒂利斯誓言阻止]

    [图片1:佛罗里达州共和党参议员里克·斯科特]

    佛罗里达州共和党参议员里克·斯科特表示,除非航班延误和取消现象越来越严重,否则参议院民主党人不会认真对待政府停摆。(比尔·克拉克/CQ-滚石报通过盖蒂图片社提供)

    这就是参议院共和党人面临的难题——如何确保法案通过。

    《拯救美国法案》是唐纳德·特朗普总统立法议程的核心。事实上,总统警告称,除非国会满足他的要求,否则他不会签署任何其他法案——除了可能的国土安全部(DHS)资金法案。

    共和党人一致认为《拯救美国法案》的重要性,但南达科他州共和党参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩承诺,除了通过法案外,其他一切都可以谈。

    “我将把《拯救美国法案》提交参议院进行全面而充分的辩论,”图恩表示。

    这是因为共和党人无法打破民主党人的阻挠议事。

    “这是我们长期以来在美国看到的最糟糕的事情之一,”纽约州民主党参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默表示。

    [舒默抨击黑格塞斯为军队提供帝王蟹餐,但拜登时期的收据显示类似账单]

    [图片2:参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默]

    2026年3月5日,纽约州民主党参议院少数党领袖查尔斯·舒默在美国国会大厦外参加新闻发布会。(汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ-滚石报通过盖蒂图片社提供)

    “总统希望通过这项法案的真正原因是减少参加11月选举的人数,”伊利诺伊州民主党参议院少数党党鞭迪克·德宾表示。

    打破阻挠议事需要60票。参议院共和党人只有53票。因此,一些共和党人主张通过议会策略彻底废除阻挠议事规则。

    “我愿意废除阻挠议事规则以通过《拯救美国法案》,”堪萨斯州共和党参议员罗杰·马歇尔表示。

    冷战时期的言辞充斥着整个辩论。事实上,保守派恳求图恩在民主党人再次在秋季或未来十年控制参议院之前,先发制人地废除阻挠议事规则。

    “这实际上是我能看到的防止他们在获得参议院多数席位后废除阻挠议事规则的唯一方法,”威斯康星州共和党参议员罗恩·约翰逊表示。

    其他共和党人希望迫使民主党人进行老式的阻挠议事——直到他们筋疲力尽。

    “他们应该像过去一样站在发言席上连续发言。他们可以想说多久就说多久,但迟早他们会耗尽时间,”密苏里州共和党参议员乔希·霍利表示。

    如果经过几天或几周的辩论后所有人都筋疲力尽,那么参议院不需要60票的测试投票来打破阻挠议事规则。这意味着他们可以以简单多数(51票)通过法案。

    许多共和党参议员现在引用20世纪30年代弗兰克·卡普拉的经典电影《史密斯先生到华盛顿》。在这部电影中,吉米·斯图尔特饰演的理想主义参议员进行阻挠议事,直到在参议院会议厅倒下。

    “他们应该像吉米·斯图尔特那样连续数小时站在那里,”密苏里州共和党参议员埃里克·施密特表示。

    但大多数共和党人反对吉米·斯图尔特式的阻挠议事方式。他们不仅担心无限制的辩论,更担心无限制的修正案程序。

    “这种冗长辩论的阻挠议事将是一场混乱。我是说,这可能需要两到三周时间。民主党人会提出各种有问题的修正案,”持怀疑态度的北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯预测,“还没有人向我描述过具体的计划。比如需要多少天,如何应对这种情况。我们已经全面考虑了政治立场,最终会成功的。”

    但不会有无限制的修正案程序。虽然图恩会允许辩论持续一段时间(福克斯被告知可能一周或更长时间,甚至可能全天候),但他将掌握“球权”。图恩不会立即提出结束辩论的测试投票(需要60票),但他会立即阻止双方的所有修正案。

    就像国会山上的所有事情一样,这关乎数学计算。尽管会有很多关于《拯救美国法案》和冗长辩论的讨论,但共和党方面没有足够的支持来废除参议院的阻挠议事规则和先例。

    “我们中的许多人认为不应该废除阻挠议事规则,因为它保障了多数党的权利。总有一天我们会回到少数党,”西弗吉尼亚州共和党参议员雪莱·摩尔·卡皮托表示,“这确实是一个分裂点。”

    卡皮托补充说,他们有“意愿”处理《拯救美国法案》,但要通过议会策略废除阻挠议事规则来通过法案是不可能的。

    “没有足够的票数来完成这项任务,”卡皮托观察到。

    特朗普和其他保守派开始加大对图恩的压力。

    [图恩保证选民身份法案将在参议院投票,尽管舒默和民主党反对:“我们将进行投票”]

    [图片3:参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩,R-S.D.]

    南达科他州共和党人、总统表示:“我认为他是个很棒的人。我确实这么认为。但这不是他不想做,而是他认为自己做不到。这很糟糕。”

    尽管批评指向图恩,一些共和党人仍在为他辩护。

    “不是约翰·图恩在扼杀它,而是共和党成员不相信可以通过冗长辩论来通过这项法案,”怀俄明州共和党参议员辛西娅·卢米斯表示,“这将给美国参议院的其他事务带来巨大的延误,而无法通过《拯救美国法案》取得积极成果。”

    值得注意的是,总统没有因为图恩不愿废除阻挠议事规则以通过《拯救美国法案》而公开批评他。然而,特朗普在第一任期内经常要求前参议院多数党领袖、肯塔基州共和党参议员米奇·麦康奈尔这样做。总统经常抨击麦康奈尔管理参议院的方式,尽管这位肯塔基州共和党人确立了抑制最高法院提名人阻挠议事的新先例。麦康奈尔在阻挠议事规则上的策略确保了最高法院大法官尼尔·戈萨奇、布雷特·卡瓦诺和艾米·科尼·巴雷特的确认。

    但到目前为止,没有对图恩的严厉批评。

    尽管如此,一些共和党人认为参议院的“魔法”可以挽救《拯救美国法案》。

    “我以前见过约翰·图恩从帽子里变出兔子,”卢米斯表示,“我希望这次帽子里也有兔子。”

    参议院将于周二下午就该法案开始辩论进行测试投票,这需要简单多数。副总统JD·万斯可能需要打破平局才能启动该法案的辩论。

    [点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序]

    [图片4:副总统JD·万斯在白宫西翼行走时使用手机通话]

    2026年3月6日,副总统JD·万斯在华盛顿白宫西翼行走时使用手机通话。(亚历克斯·布兰登/美联社照片)

    但参议院没有足够的票数像麦康奈尔对最高法院提名人那样废除先例来通过《拯救美国法案》,也没有足够的票数进行全面的“冗长辩论”,从而绕过60票的要求。

    如果共和党未能通过《拯救美国法案》,其基本盘可能会对参议院共和党人掀起轩然大波。特朗普目前保持沉默,但也可能在未来进行反击。

    查德·佩格拉姆目前担任福克斯新闻频道(FNC)首席国会记者。他于2007年9月加入该网络,常驻华盛顿特区。

    President Trump warns he won’t sign other bills until Congress passes SAVE America Act

    Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram reports on the partial government shutdown entering a second month as lawmakers battle over funding on ‘Fox Report.’

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    7 min

    You’ll hear volumes from congressional Republicans about the importance of passing the SAVE America Act in the coming days. The bill requires proof of citizenship to vote.

    “We need to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat in America,” said Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio.

    “The SAVE America Act is an important bill,” said Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., on Fox News. “So we’ve got to figure out how to get it passed.”

    [TRUMP-BACKED VOTER ID BILL FACES GOP RESISTANCE AS TILLIS VOWS TO STOP IT]

    [Image 1: Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla.]

    Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., said that Senate Democrats wouldn’t take the shutdown seriously until flight delays and cancellations started to stack up.(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

    And that is the conundrum facing Senate Republicans — figuring out how to get it passed.

    The SAVE America Act is the touchstone of President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda. In fact, the president warned he wouldn’t sign any other bill into law — except perhaps a DHS funding measure — until Congress aligns with his demands.

    Republicans agree on the importance of the SAVE America Act, but Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. is promising everything but passage.

    “I will be bringing the SAVE America Act to the floor, and we will be having a full and robust debate,” said Thune.

    That’s because Republicans can’t break a Democratic filibuster.

    “This is one of the worst things we’ve seen in America in a very long time,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

    [SCHUMER SWINGS AT HEGSETH OVER KING CRAB MEALS FOR THE TROOPS, BUT BIDEN-ERA RECEIPTS SHOW SIMILAR TAB]

    [Image 2: Sen. Chuck Schumer]

    Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., arrives for a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol on March 5, 2026.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

    “The real reason this president wants this bill to pass is to reduce the number of people voting in the November election,” said Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

    It takes 60 votes to break a filibuster. Republicans only have 53 votes in the Senate. So some Republicans advocate parliamentary ballistics to obliterate the filibuster.

    “I would nuke the filibuster to pass the SAVE America Act,” said Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan.

    Cold War rhetoric permeates this entire debate. In fact, conservatives implored Thune to launch a pre-emptive first strike to terminate the filibuster before Democrats again win control of the Senate — be it this fall or a decade from now.

    “It’s really about the only way I can see preventing them from nuking the filibuster once they gain the majority in the Senate,” said Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis.

    Other Republicans want to force Democrats to filibuster the old-fashioned way — until they’re exhausted.

    “They should have to go hold the floor like it used to be in the old days. They can go and talk as much as they want. But sooner or later they’re going to run out of time,” said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo.

    If everyone finally fades after days or weeks of debate, then the Senate doesn’t need a test vote to break a filibuster — needing 60 yeas. That means they can pass the bill with a simple majority: 51.

    Lots of Republican senators are now invoking the 1930s Frank Capra classic “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.” That’s where Jimmy Stewart plays an idealistic senator who filibusters until he collapses in the Senate chamber.

    “They should have to go out there, hours on end, like a Jimmy Stewart moment,” said Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.

    But most Republicans reject the Jimmy Stewart approach. They’re not so much worried about unlimited debate during a talking filibuster, but the unlimited amendment process.

    “The talking filibuster, I think will be a goat rodeo. I mean, it could take two or three weeks. The Democrats will tee up all kinds of problematic votes,” predicted a skeptical Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C. “I haven’t had anybody describe to me the project plan. Here are the number of days. This is how we counter people. We’ve got all of our political flanks covered. And this is how we succeed at the end.”

    But there won’t be an unlimited amendment process. While Thune will allow the debate to go on for a while (Fox is told perhaps a week or more, perhaps around the clock), he will maintain “ball control.” Thune won’t immediately tee up a test vote to end debate, needing 60 yeas. But Thune will immediately block all amendments from both sides.

    Like everything on Capitol Hill, it’s about the math. And while there will be a lot of talking about the SAVE Act and the talking filibuster, there’s not enough support on the GOP side of the aisle to unspool the Senate’s filibuster rules and precedents.

    “Many of us don’t believe that we should undo the filibuster because it holds the rights of the majority. And one day we’ll be back in the minority,” said Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va. “It’s a real splitter here.”

    Capito added that there was a “will” to deal with the SAVE America Act. But the parliamentary machinations it would take to blow up the filibuster to pass the bill do not exist.

    “There’s not enough numbers to get it done,” observed Capito.

    Trump and other conservatives are starting to dial up pressure on Thune.

    [THUNE GUARANTEES VOTER ID BILL TO HIT THE SENATE DESPITE SCHUMER, DEM OPPOSITION: ‘WE WILL HAVE A VOTE’]

    [Image 3: Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D.]

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., argued that Democrats were continuing their push to keep DHS closed because it was “politically advantageous.”(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

    “I think he’s a wonderful person. I do,” the president said of the South Dakota Republican on Fox News Radio. “But it’s not that he doesn’t want to do it. He doesn’t think he can do it. And that’s bad.”

    Despite criticism directed at Thune, some Republicans are defending him.

    “It’s not John Thune that’s killing it. It’s members of the Republican Party that are not convinced that a talking filibuster can be used to pass this,” said Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo. “It will be an infliction of tremendous delays on other matters before the U.S. Senate without the positive results of passage of the SAVE Act.”

    It’s significant that the president has not called out Thune over his reluctance to end the filibuster to pass the SAVE America Act. However, Trump routinely demanded that former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., do just that during his first term. The president often lambasted McConnell’s stewardship of the Senate, despite the Kentucky Republican establishing a new precedent to inhibit filibusters of Supreme Court nominees. McConnell’s maneuver on the filibuster assured the confirmations of Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

    But so far, no sharp criticism of Thune.

    Still, some Republicans believe Senate magic could salvage the SAVE America Act.

    “I’ve seen John Thune pull rabbits out of his hat before,” said Lummis. “And I’m hoping there’s a rabbit in his hat on this one.”

    The Senate takes a test vote just to start debate on the bill Tuesday afternoon. That needs a simple majority. It’s possible that Vice President JD Vance may need to break a tie to launch debate on the bill.

    [CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP]

    [Image 4: Vice President JD Vance talking on a cell phone while walking toward the West Wing.]

    Vice President JD Vance talks on his phone as he walks to the West Wing of the White House, March 6, 2026, in Washington.(Alex Brandon/AP Photo)

    But the Senate doesn’t have the votes to blow up the precedents like McConnell did with the Supreme Court in order to pass the SAVE America Act, nor are there the votes to execute a full-blown “talking filibuster,” bypassing the need for 60 yeas.

    Consider the firestorm that could rain down on Senate Republicans from their base if the GOP fails to pass the SAVE America Act. Trump has held his tongue so far, but it’s possible there could be recriminations from him, too.

    Chad Pergram currently serves as Chief Congressional Correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC). He joined the network in September 2007 and is based out of Washington, D.C.

  • 新闻


    请提供需要翻译的英文新闻文章,我将按照要求进行高质量的简体中文翻译。

    No English content available

  • 美国足协在2026年世界杯前推出新星条旗球衣


    2026年3月16日 / 美国东部时间下午4:47 / CBS新闻

    美国足协与耐克周一在2026年国际足联世界杯前夕联合发布了美国国家队的新款队服。该系列包括两件主球衣(星条旗设计)以及一套新的守门员制服。

    据美国足协透露,美国男子国家足球队预计将于本月晚些时候在亚特兰大首次亮相新队服。

    耐克表示,新设计在球员的参与下开发而成,包括面料重量和接缝位置的调整。耐克称,运动员还对球衣的透气性和活动自由度提出了意见,以确保他们能专注于比赛表现。

    U.S. men's national team players Max Arfsten and Diego Luna in new jerseys. U.S. Soccer/Nike

    “国家队球衣不仅代表场上球员的荣耀,也承载着一路支持他们的球迷的骄傲,”美国足协首席商务官戴夫·赖特在周一的新闻稿中表示。

    每件球衣的衣领内侧都有一个隐藏的“Inner Pride”(内在骄傲)标志,美国足协和耐克称其象征着球员踏上赛场时的动力。此外,耐克还专门为美国足协设计了名为“星条旗”的新字体,未来将独家用于队服和其他设计中。

    USWNT players Alyssa Thompson is seen in the new stars kit, and Rose Lavelle is in the stripes kit. U.S. Soccer/Nike

    马吉·赖特、迭戈·卢娜、福拉林·巴洛贡、艾丽萨·汤普森和罗斯·拉韦尔等国家队球员参与了推广新队服的宣传活动。男子和女子国家队成员也预计将在2028年洛杉矶奥运会前与耐克合作。

    美国足协和耐克表示,这些球衣将推出两种款式:球员同款的“真实比赛版”(采用与球员相同的高性能技术)和面向球迷的低成本“球场版”。它们将于2026年国际足联世界杯前在全美零售门店和线上平台发售。

    世界杯将于6月11日开幕,7月19日结束决赛,比赛将在美国、加拿大和墨西哥的多个主办城市举行。

    美国国家队过往球衣


    据美国足协称,新款球衣的设计灵感源自过往队服,耐克设计师曾询问男子国家队球员喜欢哪些历史款球衣。

    “更新标志性的设计是我们致敬历史同时创造新意的方式,”色彩设计师娜塔莉·麦基奥在新闻稿中表示。

    耐克和美国足协透露,灵感来源包括2012年的“沃尔多”(Waldo)球衣。

    Clint Dempsey during the USA vs. Brazil International friendly soccer match at FedEx Field, Washington D.C., on May 30, 2012. Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images

    1994年世界杯球衣则采用了另一种风格的条纹设计。

    The U.S. men's soccer team pose for a team group shot during the 1994 World Cup events at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California. Al Bello/ALLSPORT/Getty Images

    U.S. Soccer unveils new stars and stripes jerseys ahead of 2026 World Cup

    March 16, 2026 / 4:47 PM EDT / CBS News

    U.S. Soccer and Nike on Monday unveiled new national team kits ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The collection includes two primary jersey, stars and stripes, as well as a new goalkeeper uniform.

    The United States men’s national soccer team is expected to debut the new uniforms later this month in Atlanta, according to U.S. Soccer.

    Nike said the new designs were developed with input from players, including on the weight of the fabric and seam placement. The athletes also weighed in on the jerseys’ breathability and mobility so they can focus on their performance, Nike said.

    U.S. men’s national team players Max Arfsten and Diego Luna in new jerseys. U.S. Soccer/Nike

    “A national team jersey represents the pride of wearing the crest, not just for players on the field, but also for the fans who support them every step of the way,” Dave Wright, chief commercial officer of U.S. Soccer, said in a news release on Monday.

    Inside each jersey, there’s a hidden “Inner Pride” mark in the collar. It’s meant to symbolize the motivation players carry onto the field, U.S. Soccer and Nike said. New fonts, called the Stars and Stripes typefaces, were also created specifically U.S. Soccer to use exclusively on kits and other designs in the years to come.

    USWNT players Alyssa Thompson is seen in the new stars kit, and Rose Lavelle is in the stripes kit. U.S. Soccer/Nike

    Haji Wright, Diego Luna, Folarin Balogun, Alyssa Thompson and Rose Lavelle were among the national team players featured in the campaign to promote the new kits. Both men’s and women’s national team members are also expected to collaborate with Nike ahead of the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles.

    The jerseys will be sold to the public in both an authentic match version, with the same performance technology worn by players, and a lower-cost stadium version for fans, U.S. Soccer and Nike said. They will be available at retail locations across the country and online ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

    The World Cup kicks off June 11 and runs through the final on July 19, with matches scheduled in multiple host cities in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

    Past U.S. national team soccer jerseys


    The new kits were inspired by past jerseys, according to U.S. Soccer, with Nike designers asking the men’s team players about previous U.S. jerseys they liked.

    “Updating something that is recognizable is our way of honoring the past but still creating something new,” color designer Natalie McKeough said in a news release.

    Among the previous looks that inspired the current jerseys is the “Waldo” kit from 2012, according to Nike and U.S. Soccer.

    Clint Dempsey during the USA vs. Brazil International friendly soccer match at FedEx Field, Washington D.C., on May 30, 2012. Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images

    A different style of stripes was prominently featured in the 1994 World Cup kit.

    The U.S. men’s soccer team pose for a team group shot during the 1994 World Cup events at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California. Al Bello/ALLSPORT/Getty Images

  • 科宁与进步派众议员格雷格·卡萨在机场激烈对峙,因国土安全部停摆问题产生冲突


    得克萨斯州共和党参议员约翰·科宁向无薪的TSA工作人员送去了Whataburger快餐,而得克萨斯州民主党众议员格雷格·卡萨批评了这一行为

    作者:亚当·帕克
    福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年3月16日 美国东部时间下午5:37

    得克萨斯州共和党参议员约翰·科宁与得克萨斯州民主党众议员格雷格·卡萨周一下午就国土安全部(DHS)资金问题爆发激烈争执,起因是这位进步派议员试图打断科宁的新闻发布会。

    “你为什么不告诉民主党人投票支付这些可怜人的工资?”科宁对卡萨说,指的是因周五停摆而首次错过全额薪水的运输安全管理局(TSA)员工。

    “那我们来做吧,”左翼国会进步党团主席卡萨回应道。

    “不,你去做,”科宁回击,”我已经一次次投票支持了。”

    得克萨斯州共和党参议员约翰·科宁与得克萨斯州民主党众议员格雷格·卡萨周一就国土安全部(DHS)资金问题爆发激烈言语冲突。 (KTBC)

    这场口角发生之际,国土安全部停摆已进入第五周,结束僵局的谈判近几周似乎陷入停滞。参议院民主党人几乎一致否决了共和党人周四提出的全面资助该机构的努力,理由是反对那些未限制移民执法的支出措施。

    正在为第五个参议院任期与得克萨斯州总检察长、共和党人肯·帕克斯顿角逐党内初选的科宁,周一在奥斯汀机场外举行新闻发布会,抗议民主党人拒绝全额资助国土安全部。代表奥斯汀地区的卡萨在科宁抵达前闯入了这场活动。

    由于TSA工作人员短缺,机场目前建议乘客至少在起飞前2.5小时到达。

    科宁还为无薪工作的TSA员工带来了午餐——这一行为遭到卡萨批评。

    “他应该给他们发工资,而不是送汉堡,”卡萨在争执后面对记者回应科宁的Whataburger送餐行为时说道。

    然而,卡萨多次投票反对一项全年有效的国土安全部拨款法案,该法案本应资助TSA员工的工资直至9月底。

    这位得克萨斯州民主党人反而推动了一项单独的措施,为TSA提供资金,却不资助国土安全部中与移民执法相关的职能。共和党人将该提案描述为”行不通的方案”,认为国土安全部的每一名雇员——包括海关和边境保护局(CBP)及移民和海关执法局(ICE)的工作人员——都应该获得报酬。

    预计众议院民主党人最早将于本周就一项资助国土安全部非移民相关部分的立法进行投票。

    由于运输安全管理局(TSA)员工短缺,部分政府停摆期间他们无薪工作,全美机场的旅客正遭遇航班中断和安检口长时间等待。 (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    运输部长肖恩·达菲周日表示,自停摆开始以来,约有300名TSA官员辞职,缺勤率增加了一倍多。在2025年秋季45天的停摆期间,许多经常靠工资度日的TSA员工也被迫无薪工作,此后出现了这些离职现象。

    “当你拿不到薪水时,人们最终会想办法养家糊口,这意味着他们会离开TSA去寻找其他工作,”科宁周一表示,”这是不可接受的。”

    国会议员根据宪法有权获得薪水,但一些议员出于与联邦雇员的团结,推迟领取自己的工资。

    科宁还指责卡萨在奥斯汀一家酒吧发生恐怖枪击事件后拒绝支持全年有效的国土安全部拨款法案。过去一周,美国还在纽约市、弗吉尼亚州诺福克和密歇根州西布卢姆菲尔德发生了与恐怖主义相关的袭击。

    奥斯汀警方对西六街发生的一起与恐怖主义有关的枪击事件现场作出反应,周日三人在枪手被警方击毙前遭枪击身亡。 (Jay Janner/The Austin American-Statesman via Getty Images)

    “我们在第六街看到的所有恐怖袭击呢?”科宁对卡萨说,”你想让这些袭击继续发生吗?这些人在保护我们的安全。告诉民主党人投票资助国土安全部。”

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系卡萨办公室寻求置评。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6391033251112

    Cornyn clashes with progressive Rep Greg Casar in heated airport face-off over DHS shutdown

    Sen John Cornyn brought Whataburger to unpaid TSA workers, while Rep Greg Casar criticized the gesture

    By Adam Pack
    Fox News

    Published March 16, 2026 5:37pm EDT

    Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, got into a heated exchange Monday afternoon over Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding after the progressive lawmaker attempted to interrupt the senator’s news conference.

    “Why don’t you tell the Democrats to vote to pay these poor people,” Cornyn told Casar, referring to Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees who missed their first full paychecks due to the shutdown on Friday.

    “Let’s do it,” Casar, chair of the left-wing Congressional Progressive Caucus, responded.

    “No, you do it,” Cornyn shot back. “I’ve voted for it time and time again.”

    Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, engaged in a heated verbal spat over Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding on Monday.(KTBC)

    The shouting match comes as the DHS shutdown entered its fifth week Monday, with negotiations to end the stalemate appearing to stall in recent weeks. Senate Democrats near unanimously blocked a Republican effort Thursday to fully fund the agency, citing opposition to spending measures that do not rein in immigration enforcement.

    Cornyn, who is vying against Attorney General Ken Paxton, R-Texas, in a runoff election for a fifth Senate term, held a news conference outside the Austin airport on Monday to protest Democrats’ refusal to fully fund DHS. Casar, who represents the Austin area, crashed the event before Cornyn arrived.

    The airport is currently advising passengers to arrive at least 2.5 hours before departure due to a shortage of TSA workers.

    Cornyn also brought lunch to TSA employees who are reporting to work without pay — a gesture that Casar criticized.

    “Instead of bringing people burgers, he should bring them their paychecks,” Casar told reporters in response to the Whataburger haul following the altercation.

    Casar, however, has repeatedly voted against a full-year DHS appropriations bill that would fund the salaries of TSA employees through the end of September.

    The Texas Democrat has instead pushed for a standalone measure to fund TSA while leaving the immigration enforcement-related functions of DHS without funding. Republicans have characterized that proposal as a nonstarter, arguing that every individual employed by DHS — including those working for Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) — should be paid.

    House Democrats are expected to force a vote as early as this week on legislation that would fund the non-immigration portions of DHS.

    Travelers are encountering flight disruptions and long wait times at security checkpoints at airports across the country due to a shortage of Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees, who are working without pay during the partial government shutdown.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    Roughly 300 TSA officers have resigned and absences have more than doubled since the shutdown began, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Sunday. The departures come after many TSA employees — who often live paycheck to paycheck — were also required to work without pay during a 45-day shutdown in fall 2025.

    “At some point, when you’re not getting your paycheck, people are going to have to look for ways to support their families, which means they’ll be leaving the TSA for other employment,” Cornyn said Monday. “And that’s unacceptable.”

    Lawmakers are guaranteed their pay under the Constitution, though some members of Congress have deferred their salaries in solidarity with federal employees.

    Cornyn also excoriated Casar for declining to back a full-year DHS funding bill after a terrorist shooting at an Austin bar left the city reeling. The country has also seen terror-related attacks in New York City, Norfolk, Va., and West Bloomfield, Mich., over the past week.

    Austin police respond to the scene of a terror-linked shooting on West 6th Street on Sunday, where three people were shot and killed before the gunman was killed by responding authorities.(Jay Janner/The Austin American-Statesman via Getty Images)

    “How about all the terrorist attacks like we’ve seen down on Sixth Street?” Cornyn told Casar. “You want those to continue? These people are keeping us safe. Tell the Democrats to vote for funding the DHS.”

    Fox News Digital reached out to Casar’s office for comment.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6391033251112

  • 特朗普前辩护律师在美国律师协会会议上因称赞特朗普时期司法部遭批评,获保守派法律人士线上力挺


    前总统唐纳德·特朗普的辩护律师约翰·劳罗(John Lauro)在近期美国律师协会(ABA)会议上因称赞特朗普任内司法部而遭到反对,随后迅速获得保守派法律人士的线上支持。

    据彭博法律(Bloomberg Law)对此次活动的报道,曾在特别检察官杰克·史密斯(Jack Smith)2020年大选案中为特朗普辩护的律师约翰·劳罗表示,特朗普任内司法部”状况更好”,这令其他小组成员和听众感到震惊。

    劳罗周一在简短电话中告诉福克斯新闻数字版,该活动”充满了情绪化反应”。

    “我批评美国律师协会(ABA)和其他精英法律组织没有谴责前政府进行政治虚假审判和表演式审判,特别是针对特朗普总统的审判——拜登政府曾希望在90天内对他进行审判,而这比在华盛顿处理交通罚单的时间还要短。”劳罗说。

    劳工部下令律师与ABA切断联系,抨击该组织为’激进’活动力量

    图45:唐纳德·特朗普与律师约翰·劳罗、约翰·绍尔和威尔·沙夫站在一起

    2024年1月9日,美国前总统唐纳德·特朗普的律师约翰·劳罗在华盛顿特区联邦地区法院外接受媒体采访。(贾宾·博茨福德/《华盛顿邮报》通过盖蒂图片社)

    这场紧张的小组讨论凸显了特朗普政府与美国律师协会持续的冲突,促使司法部官员和律师表达对该组织的蔑视。

    “美国律师协会就是垃圾,我很自豪从未成为其成员。”民权司司长哈米特·迪隆(Harmeet Dhillon)表示,”它诋毁法官[罗伯特]·博克的小动作让我下定决心不加入。”

    “这简直是对美国律师协会作为绝对耻辱的又一证明,”副助理司法部长迭戈·佩斯塔纳(Diego Pestana)写道,”约翰·劳罗是该国最优秀的诉讼律师之一和爱国者,只因敢于表达与自由派白领律师不同的观点而受到恶劣对待。”

    劳罗在圣地亚哥会议上的小组讨论中表示,他”拥有代表一位可能比美国任何政治人物都更多受到美国刑事司法系统虐待的政治人物的独特经历”。

    “当前政府发生的一切都必须从一个被刑事司法系统迫害的人的角度来看待。”劳罗说。

    支持劳罗的包括爱荷华州副检察长埃里克·韦桑(Eric Wessan),他称美国律师协会”代表极端党派派系”。

    “这没关系!但他们不应在法学院认证(或司法人员选拔)中发挥作用。”韦桑说。

    2020年大选案未被起诉的同谋者、前司法部官员杰夫·克拉克(Jeff Clark)称劳罗”是个有原则的勇敢之人”。

    特朗普1月6日起诉书中提到的6名同谋者是谁?我们所知道的

    另一位社交媒体用户,一位匿名的佐治亚州法律评论人士表示,虽然他不同意劳罗的评论,但”嫉妒”劳罗”有机会告诉满屋子那种傲慢、矫揉造作的辩护律师——他们总在ABA会议上混日子——去他妈的。他本应这样做。”

    劳罗的言论引发了参与者的反对。哈佛大学法学教授、退休联邦法官南希·格特纳(Nancy Gertner)回应称,任何围绕特朗普起诉的问题都不”足以证明美国民主的分裂是正当的”。

    前联邦检察官米切尔·埃普纳(Mitchell Epner)表示:”我要感谢劳罗先生指出了’皇帝没穿衣服’。法治已经死亡,因为在座的人和司法部都惹恼了特朗普总统。”

    图47:特朗普律师约翰·劳罗

    2023年8月28日,曾担任总统唐纳德·特朗普辩护律师的约翰·劳罗离开华盛顿特区联邦法院。(阿尔·德拉戈/彭博通过盖蒂图片社)

    “我不敢相信你认为一个人可以决定司法部调查和起诉谁是正常或好事。”律师兼小组主持人桑迪·温伯格(Sandy Weinberg)说。

    共和党人长期以来一直认为美国律师协会(ABA)宣扬民主党立场,其在法律界的建制派地位对保守派不利。美国律师协会官网展示的工作包括支持”LGBTQ+”权益、堕胎权、更严格的枪支管制措施以及多元化、公平与包容政策。

    美国律师协会还对特朗普政府持反对立场,其主席称该政府”大规模违背法治”。

    司法部告知美国律师协会将不再遵守司法提名评级

    图49:特朗普与邦迪

    2025年6月27日,美国司法部长帕姆·邦迪在华盛顿特区白宫简报室与总统唐纳德·特朗普就最高法院最新裁决发表讲话。(乔·雷德尔/盖蒂图片社)

    美国律师协会数十年来一直拥有巨大权力,在联邦法官提名、诉讼参与以及法律行业招聘中发挥重要作用。其一个部门还负责法学院认证。

    在特朗普任内,包括司法部和劳工部在内的多个部门和机构已告知政治任命官员,他们不能以官方身份与美国律师协会(ABA)结盟。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

    与此同时,司法部已着手终止对美国律师协会项目超过300万美元的联邦拨款,但一名法官裁定此举违宪。司法部长帕姆·邦迪去年告知美国律师协会,司法部不会提前通知该组织司法提名人选,这与美国律师协会在参议院提名流程中提前评级的数十年惯例相反。

    福克斯新闻数字版已联系美国律师协会寻求置评。

    阿什利·奥利弗(Ashley Oliver)是福克斯新闻数字版和福克斯商业频道的记者,负责报道司法部和法律事务。请将新闻线索发送至ashley.oliver@fox.com

    President Donald Trump’s former defense lawyer received swift backing from conservative legal figures online after facing pushback at a recent American Bar Association (ABA) conference for praising the Trump Department of Justice.

    Attorney John Lauro, who defended Trump in special counsel Jack Smith’s 2020 election case, said the DOJ was “in a better place” under Trump, causing fellow panelists and audience members to shudder, according to a Bloomberg Law report of the event.

    Lauro told Fox News Digital in a brief phone call on Monday that the event “was a highly triggered environment.”

    “I called out the ABA and other elite legal organizations for not condemning the prior administration in holding political sham trials and show trials, particularly the one directed at President Trump, where the Biden administration wanted to put him on trial in 90 days, which is shorter than it takes for a traffic ticket to get worked through in D.C.,” Lauro said.

    LABOR DEPARTMENT ORDERS LAWYERS TO CUT TIES WITH ABA, SLAMS GROUP AS ‘RADICAL’ ACTIVIST FORCE

    Image 45: Donald Trump stands with lawyers John Laura, John Sauer and Will Scharf

    President Donald Trump’s attorney John Lauro, left, speaks to the media at following his appearance at the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., Jan. 9, 2024.(Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    The tense panel put a spotlight on the Trump administration’s ongoing fight with the ABA as it spurred DOJ officials and lawyers to voice their disdain for the organization.

    “The ABA is trash and I’m proud to never have been a member,” Civil Rights Division head Harmeet Dhillon said. “Its stunt trashing Judge [Robert] Bork did it for me.”

    “As if we needed anymore proof of the absolute disgrace that is the ABA,” wrote Associate Deputy Attorney General Diego Pestana. “John Lauro, one of the best trial attorneys in the country and patriot, treated terribly for simply daring to voice a view contrary to the liberal white collar bar.”

    Lauro said during the panel, held at a conference in San Diego, that he had “the unique experience of representing a political figure who was probably more abused by the criminal justice system in America than any other political figure ever.”

    “Everything that has gone on in the current administration must be looked at from the eyes of a man who was victimized by the criminal justice system,” Lauro said.

    Among those rallying behind Lauro was also Iowa Solicitor General Eric Wessan, who said the ABA “represents a hyperpartisan faction.”

    “That’s fine! But they should play no role in law school accreditation (or judicial selection),” Wessan said.

    Former DOJ official Jeff Clark, an un-indicted co-conspirator in the 2020 election case, called Lauro “a bold man of principle.”

    WHO ARE THE 6 CO-CONSPIRATORS NAMED IN TRUMP’S JAN. 6 INDICTMENT? HERE’S WHAT WE KNOW

    Another social media user, an anonymous Georgia-based legal commentator, said that while he disagreed with Lauro’s comments, he was “jealous” that Lauro “had the opportunity to tell a room of the type of haughty, effete defense lawyers who hang around at ABA conferences to go f— themselves. He should have taken it.”

    Lauro’s remarks had elicited pushback from participants. Nancy Gertner, a Harvard University law professor and retired federal judge, responded that any issues surrounding Trump’s prosecutions did not “justify the fracture of American democracy.”

    Former federal prosecutor Mitchell Epner said: “I wanted to thank Mr. Lauro for admitting the emperor has no clothes. The rule of law is dead because the people in this room and the Department of Justice pissed off President Trump.”

    Image 47: Trump lawyer John Lauro

    John Lauro, who served as a defense lawyer for President Donald Trump, exits federal court in Washington, D.C., Aug. 28, 2023.(Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    “I can’t believe that you think that that’s normal or good that one person can dictate who the Department of Justice investigates and indicts,” lawyer and panel moderator Sandy Weinberg said.

    Republicans have long argued the ABA promotes Democrat-aligned viewpoints and that its institutional presence in the legal world is a disadvantage to conservatives. The ABA’s website showcases work that includes support for “LGBTQ+” initiatives, abortion access, stricter gun control measures, and diversity, equity and inclusion.

    The ABA has also taken a stance against Trump, condemning what its president described as the administration’s “wide-scale affronts to the rule of law.”

    JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TELLS AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION IT WILL NO LONGER COMPLY WITH RATINGS FOR JUDICIAL NOMINEES

    Image 49: Trump and Bondi

    Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks alongside President Donald Trump on recent Supreme Court rulings in the briefing room at the White House on June 27, 2025 in Washington, D.C.(Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

    The ABA has for decades wielded enormous power, weighing in on nominations of federal judges, engaging in litigation and helping firms across the legal industry with recruitment. One arm of the ABA also handles law school accreditation.

    Under Trump, several departments and agencies, including the DOJ and Department of Labor, have told political appointees they cannot affiliate with the ABA in their official capacity.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    The DOJ, meanwhile, moved to terminate more than $3 million in federal grants to ABA programs, though a judge ruled the move was unconstitutional. Attorney General Pam Bondi told the ABA last year that the DOJ would not give advanced notice to the organization about judicial nominees, a reversal of a decades-long practice of allowing the organization to rate the nominees before they advance in the Senate.

    Fox News Digital reached out to the ABA for comment.

    Ashley Oliver is a reporter for Fox News Digital and FOX Business, covering the Justice Department and legal affairs. Email story tips to ashley.oliver@fox.com.

  • 最高法院将审理特朗普政府挑战叙利亚和海地公民在美国受保护身份的案件


    发布时间: 2026年3月16日 美国东部时间下午4:14 / 福克斯新闻

    最高法院周一表示,将审查特朗普政府试图撤销数十万居住在美国的海地和叙利亚移民临时法律保护的行为——这一重大进展正值总统在其第二个白宫任期内致力于兑现强硬移民执法承诺之际。

    最高法院目前暂时维持了两项下级法院命令,这些命令阻止特朗普政府立即停止对叙利亚和海地移民的临时保护身份(TPS)指定。

    最高法院确实同意加速审理这两起合并案件,并表示将于下月举行口头辩论。

    预计在6月底前会做出裁决。

    [最高法院将审查特朗普关于出生公民权的行政命令]

    总统唐纳德·特朗普于2025年9月25日在白宫椭圆形办公室发表讲话。(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    这一消息出台之际,特朗普政府正着手终止来自大约六个国家的移民的TPS指定,其中包括约6000名居住在美国的叙利亚人和35万名海地人。

    TPS计划允许来自特定国家的个人在美国合法生活和工作,如果他们因灾难、武装冲突或其他”特殊和临时情况”无法在本国安全工作。

    上周,副检察长D.约翰·绍尔(D. John Sauer)请求最高法院干预并暂停美国地区法官安娜·雷耶斯(Ana Reyes)的一项下级法院命令,该命令阻止了政府立即撤销对海地移民临时保护身份的行为。

    [拜登任命的联邦法官裁定特朗普的”第三国”驱逐政策违宪]

    最高法院大楼位于华盛顿特区。(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    绍尔敦促最高法院解决更广泛的问题,即特朗普政府是否有权撤销对居住在美国的其他移民的TPS保护——他援引司法部对今年早些时候提交给最高法院的类似案件的上诉,该案件围绕对叙利亚移民的TPS保护展开。

    “除非法院解决这些挑战的是非曲直——这些问题现在已经在全国法院得到讨论——否则这种不可持续的循环将一次又一次重复,产生更多相互竞争的裁决和对本法院临时命令的不同看法,”绍尔上周表示。”本法院应该打破这种循环。”

    2010年海地发生毁灭性地震,造成超过20万人死亡,约150万人无家可归后,海地人首次获得TPS身份。

    在2025年5月15日于华盛顿最高法院外举行的集会上,示威者举着横幅。(AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

    这些保护措施曾多次延长,包括在2021年拜登政府期间,当时海地最后一位民选总统若弗内尔·莫伊兹(Jovenel Moïse)于7月遇刺后。

    特朗普政府寻求终止大多数TPS指定,称这些项目在民主党总统任期内被延长太久。

    [点击此处获取福克斯新闻应用程序]

    特朗普政府官员还将矛头对准了试图阻止或暂停其终止TPS保护措施的下级法院,指责下级法院法官越权并非法干涉行政部门在移民政策方面的权力。

    布雷恩·德皮施(Breanne Deppisch)是福克斯新闻数字版的国家政治记者,负责报道特朗普政府,重点关注司法部、联邦调查局和其他国家新闻。她此前曾在《华盛顿观察家报》和《华盛顿邮报》报道国家政治,还为《政治杂志》、《科罗拉多公报》等媒体撰稿。您可以通过Breanne.Deppisch@fox.com向她发送线索,或在X平台上关注她@breanne_dep。

    Supreme Court to hear Trump challenge to protected status for Syrian, Haitian nationals in US

    Published [March 16, 2026 4:14pm EDT] / Fox News

    The Supreme Court on Monday said it will review the Trump administration’s effort to revoke temporary legal protections for hundreds of thousands of Haitian and Syrian migrants living in the U.S. — a significant update that comes as the president looks to deliver on his hardline immigration enforcement promises in his second White House term.

    Justices on the high court let stand, for now, a pair of lower court orders that blocked the Trump administration from immediately halting Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations for the Syrian and Haitian migrants.

    The Supreme Court did agree to review the consolidated cases on an expedited basis, and said Monday that it will hear oral arguments in both cases next month.

    A ruling is expected by late June.

    [SCOTUS TO REVIEW TRUMP EXECUTIVE ORDER ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP]

    President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on Sept. 25, 2025.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    The news comes as the Trump administration has moved to end the TPS designation for migrants from roughly half a dozen countries, including some 6,000 Syrians and 350,000 Haitians living in the U.S. under the program.

    The TPS program allows individuals from certain countries to live and work in the U.S. legally if they cannot work safely in their home country due to a disaster, armed conflict or other “extraordinary and temporary conditions.”

    Last week, Solicitor General D. John Sauer asked the high court to intervene and stay a lower court order from U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes that blocked the administration’s effort to immediately revoke temporary protected status designations for Haitian migrants.

    [BIDEN-APPOINTED FEDERAL JUDGE RULES TRUMP’S ‘THIRD COUNTRY’ DEPORTATION POLICY IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL]

    The Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C.(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    Sauer urged the high court to take up the broader issue of whether the Trump administration can revoke TPS protections for other migrants living in the U.S. — citing the Justice Department’s appeal of a similar case centered on TPS protections for Syrian migrants that was kicked to the high court earlier this year.

    “Unless the court resolves the merits of these challenges — issues that have now been ventilated in courts nationwide — this unsustainable cycle will repeat again and again, spawning more competing rulings and competing views of what to make of this court’s interim orders,” Sauer said last week. “This court should break that cycle.”

    Haitians were first granted TPS status in 2010 after the devastating earthquake that killed more than 200,000 people and left some 1.5 million in the country homeless.

    Demonstrators hold up a banner during a rally outside the Supreme Court in Washington, May 15, 2025.(AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

    The protections were extended several times, including under the Biden administration in 2021 after the July assassination of Jovenel Moïse, Haiti’s last democratically elected president.

    The appeal comes as the Trump administration has sought to wind down most TPS designations, arguing the programs have been extended for too long under Democratic presidents.

    [CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP]

    Trump officials have also taken aim at lower courts that have sought to block or pause their efforts to wind down TPS protections, accusing the lower court judges of exceeding their authority and unlawfully intruding on the executive branch’s authority on immigration policy.

    Breanne Deppisch is a national politics reporter for Fox News Digital covering the Trump administration, with a focus on the Justice Department, FBI and other national news. She previously covered national politics at the Washington Examiner and The Washington Post, with additional bylines in Politico Magazine, the Colorado Gazette and others. You can send tips to Breanne at Breanne.Deppisch@fox.com, or follow her on X at @breanne_dep.