分类: 未分类

  • 特朗普谈伊朗:我们必须完成这项工作 | 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)政治版


    发布时间:美国东部时间2026年3月11日周三下午7:21 / 美国有线电视新闻网

    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在讲话中声称“我们已经赢得了与伊朗的战争”,但未提供其说法的实质性证据。特朗普还吹嘘了一项释放储备石油的国际协议。

    1:28 • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    今日政治新闻 13个视频

    视频广告反馈

    特朗普谈伊朗:我们必须完成这项工作

    链接已复制!

    1:28

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    特朗普六天前表示他会支持德克萨斯州参议院竞选中的一名共和党人。为何迟迟没有行动?

    4:46

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    共和党众议员迈克尔·麦考尔:美军在伊朗地面部署“几乎已被排除”

    4:51

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    特朗普希望挑选伊朗的下一任领导人。这可能适得其反

    1:45

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    黑格塞斯称美国将在“我们的时间表”内结束与伊朗的战争

    0:32

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    政府部分停摆期间,美国运输安全管理局(TSA)安检队伍排起数小时长队

    0:30

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    “这些是受‘伊斯兰国’启发的行动”:简易爆炸装置被扔到市长曼达尼家附近后,两名男子被指控

    3:16

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    “他可能在操纵市场”:前特朗普顾问评总统称伊朗战争可能很快结束

    5:08

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    “习惯吧”:杰克·塔珀回应特朗普政府对伊朗战争报道的批评

    3:26

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    “精彩”:学者对前总统奥巴马似乎批评现任政府的反应

    2:04

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    特朗普将持续的中东冲突吹嘘为成功之际,国土安全部部长被解职

    4:50

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    视频广告反馈

    《我有新闻要告诉你》喜剧演员重提马克韦恩·穆林相关话题

    1:56

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    美国有线电视新闻网调查:美以空袭危险地逼近医院

    3:28

    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    查看更多视频

    Trump on Iran: We got to finish the job | CNN Politics

    Published 7:21 PM EDT, Wed March 11, 2026 / CNN

    President Donald Trump claimed in remarks that “we’ve won” the war with Iran, without providing substantial evidence of his claim. Trump also touted an international agreement to release stockpiled oil reserves.

    1:28 • Source: CNN

    Politics of the Day 13 videos

    Video Ad Feedback

    Trump on Iran: We got to finish the job

    Link Copied!

    1:28

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Trump said he’d endorse a Republican in the Texas Senate race six days ago. What’s the holdup?

    4:46

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Republican Rep. Michael McCaul: US boots on the ground in Iran ‘pretty much ruled out’

    4:51

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Trump wants to pick Iran’s next leader. That could backfire

    1:45

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Hegseth says US will end war with Iran ‘on our timeline’

    0:32

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Hours-long TSA lines amid partial government shutdown

    0:30

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    ‘These were ISIS-inspired actions’: 2 men charged after IEDs are tossed near Mayor Mamdani’s home

    3:16

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    ‘He could be manipulating the markets’: Former Trump adviser on the president saying Iran war could be over soon

    5:08

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    ‘Get used to it’: Jake Tapper responds to Trump admin’s criticism of Iran war coverage

    3:26

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    ‘Beautiful’: Scholar reacts to former President Obama seemingly criticizing current administration

    2:04

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Trump touts ongoing Middle East conflict a success as the DHS Secretary is ousted

    4:50

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    ‘Have I Got News For You ’ comedians roll the tape on Markwayne Mullin

    1:56

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    CNN Investigates: US-Israeli strikes hit dangerously close to hospitals

    3:28

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    See more videos

  • 众议院监督委员会要求邦迪和勒特尼克就爱泼斯坦案作证


    作者:路易斯·卡西亚诺 | 福克斯新闻
    发布时间:2026年3月11日 美国东部时间晚上7:43

    众议院监督委员会向美国司法部长帕姆·邦迪发出了30天期限的正式作证要求,要求其出席正式证词陈述。

    福克斯新闻了解到,众议院监督委员会针对爱泼斯坦案的调查已要求美国司法部长帕姆·邦迪在30天内出席证词陈述。

    委员会还要求商务部长霍华德·勒特尼克在“未来10天内”出席证词陈述,一位接近委员会的消息人士透露。

    本报道正在更新中,请刷新查看最新进展。

    路易斯·卡西亚诺是福克斯新闻数字频道记者。新闻线索可发送至:louis.casiano@fox.com。

    House Oversight Committee demands depositions from Bondi and Lutnick in Epstein probe

    By Louis Casiano | Fox News
    Published March 11, 2026 7:43pm EDT

    The House Oversight Committee has issued a 30-day deadline for U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to appear for a formal deposition

    The House Oversight Committee’s Epstein investigation wants U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to appear in 30 days for a deposition, Fox News has learned.

    The committee also wants Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to appear for a deposition “within the next ten days,” a source close to the committee said.

    This story is breaking. Please check back for updates.

    Louis Casiano is a reporter for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to louis.casiano@fox.com.

  • 联邦调查局备忘录发布后,官员淡化伊朗无人机袭击加州的风险,但纽森称该州”已做好准备”


    2026年3月11日 / 美国东部时间晚上7:39 / CBS新闻

    一份联邦调查局备忘录警告称,伊朗可能试图从海上发动无人机对加州进行”突袭”,这一消息周三引发担忧——但执法官员和国土安全专家警告称,这可能并不意味着立即面临威胁。

    多名美国和加州执法及情报官员告诉CBS新闻,目前没有已知的、具体的威胁支撑这份一周前发布的备忘录,该备忘录由联邦调查局洛杉矶办公室分发给地方执法部门。

    加州州长加文·纽森在社交平台X上表示:”虽然我们目前没有意识到任何迫在眉睫的威胁,但我们仍在为州内可能发生的任何紧急情况做好准备。”

    周三获得的这份备忘录源自伊朗冲突爆发前出现的一个明显线索。

    备忘录称,联邦调查局收到”未经证实”的信息,称上月初,伊朗”据称计划利用一艘身份不明的船只在美国本土海岸外发动无人机(UAV)突袭,特别是针对加州境内未指明的目标,以防美国对伊朗发动打击”。

    备忘录补充说,联邦调查局没有关于潜在”袭击时间、方法、目标或实施者”的更多信息。

    这一警告是在美国与以色列对伊朗发动战争几天后发出的,引发人们对伊朗可能在美国本土进行报复的担忧。一些国土安全专家指出,网络攻击的风险以及伊朗据称针对美国境内异见人士和美国政要策划的”谋杀雇佣”阴谋历史。

    CBS新闻撰稿人、前美国国土安全部反恐与威胁防护助理部长萨曼莎·维诺格拉德指出:”伊朗政权拥有大量且种类多样的无人机 arsenal,已在中东广泛部署。”

    伊朗军方最近几周对美国在中东的军事基地发动报复性打击,其中包括无人机袭击。伊朗军方以”神风”式的Shahed-136无人机而闻名。

    维诺格拉德还表示,美国政府一直试图防止贩毒集团进行恶意无人机活动。

    警告”未经证实”且”不具可操作性”,官员称

    一位加州联邦执法官员告诉CBS新闻,上周分发的关于伊朗无人机的警告”不具可操作性”。

    “这一信息未经证实,”另一位联邦执法官员向CBS新闻表示,”此后,我们没有得到任何关于此类袭击的时间、来源、方法或目标的信息……我们也没有看到任何进一步的迹象。”

    另一位加州执法官员表示:”这一切意味着我们收到了这条信息,我们希望将其传达给执法部门负责人,以确保他们了解最新情况。……没有任何更多内容。”

    一位熟悉此事的执法部门消息人士告诉CBS新闻,联邦调查局会定期向地方执法部门分享收集到的任何情报。上周分享的信息中,伊朗可能计划对加州发动无人机袭击的内容只是其中一部分。

    但消息人士称,目前没有已知的具体威胁。

    联邦调查局和白宫未对该备忘录置评。

    维诺格拉德表示:”我们没有迹象表明联邦调查局在分享有关迫在眉睫的威胁的信息。”

    “联邦调查局与合作伙伴分享信息是标准操作程序——也是谨慎的做法——以确保合作伙伴了解更广泛的威胁环境,”她说,”在这些信息共享机制中,有关可信度和紧迫性的背景信息是有帮助的。”

    前联邦调查局特别探员杰夫·哈普在接受CBS新闻采访时表示:”有一项指令要求与所有不同机构就潜在威胁进行过度沟通。”

    “如果他们有任何迹象表明有相关信息,就会广播出来,”他说,”这不一定100%准确。但他们希望至少发出一个警告,以确保有一些准备和预警。”

    加州官员表示,他们保持警惕,但没有意识到任何直接威胁。

    洛杉矶警察局在一份声明中表示:”目前,洛杉矶没有已知或具体的威胁。”并补充说,该局”将继续监测全球事件以及可能影响洛杉矶的任何相关潜在威胁”。

    纽森办公室告诉CBS新闻,该备忘录”是加州每天从联邦合作伙伴那里收到的众多安全更新之一,并分发给地方执法部门和应急响应人员”。

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/no-known-specific-threat-underpinning-fbi-alert-iran-targeting-california-officials/

    Officials downplay risk of Iranian drone attacks off California after FBI memo, but Newsom says state is “prepared”

    March 11, 2026 / 7:39 PM EDT / CBS News

    An FBI memo warning that Iran may try to launch drones at California in a seaborne “surprise attack” raised concern Wednesday — but law enforcement officials and homeland security experts have cautioned that it may not point to an immediate threat.

    Multiple U.S. and California law enforcement and intelligence officials tell CBS News there is no known, specific threat underpinning the memo, which was issued a week ago and distributed to local law enforcement by the FBI’s Los Angeles office.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on X: “While we are not aware of any imminent threats at this time, we remain prepared for any emergency in our state.”

    The memo, which was obtained by CBS News on Wednesday, stems from an apparent tip that surfaced prior to the Iranian conflict.

    It said the FBI received “unverified” information that early last month, Iran “allegedly aspired to conduct a surprise attack using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) from an unidentified vessel off the coast of the United States Homeland, specifically against unspecified targets in California, in the event that the US conducted strikes against Iran.”

    The memo added that the FBI had no additional information on the potential “timing, method, target, or perpetrators.”

    The warning was issued several days into the U.S. and Israel’s war with Iran, prompting concerns that Iran could seek to retaliate on American soil. Some homeland security experts have pointed to the risk of cyberattacks and to Iran’s alleged history of murder-for-hire plots against dissidents based in the U.S. and prominent American officials.

    Samantha Vinograd, a CBS News contributor and former Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary for counterterrorism and threat protection, noted that the “Iranian regime has a vast and diverse arsenal of drones that it has deployed throughout the Middle East.”

    Iran’s retaliatory strikes on U.S. military bases in the Middle East in recent weeks have included drone attacks. The Iranian military is known for its Shahed-136 “kamikaze” drones.

    Vinograd also said the U.S. government has sought to prevent malicious drone activity by drug cartels.

    Warning is “unverified” and “not actionable,” officials say

    A California-based federal law enforcement official told CBS News the warning that was distributed last week about Iranian drones “is not actionable.”

    “This is unverified,” another federal law enforcement official told CBS News. “There has been no information given on the timing, source, method or target of any such attack… since then, we have seen no further indications of this.”

    Another California law enforcement official said: “All this means is we got this information and we want to get it out to law enforcement executives to make sure they’re up to speed on it. … There is absolutely nothing more to it.”

    A law enforcement source familiar with the matter told CBS News that the FBI regularly shares with local law enforcement any intelligence that is gathered. The information suggesting that Iran may be interested in launching drone attacks in California was a component among the information shared last week.

    But the source said there is no known specific threat.

    The FBI and the White House did not comment to CBS News on the memo.

    Vinograd said: “We have no indication that the FBI was sharing information on an imminent threat.”

    “It is standard operating procedure — and prudent — for the FBI to share information with its partners to ensure partners are aware of the broader threat landscape,” she said. “Context on credibility and imminence is helpful as a part of these information sharing mechanisms.”

    Jeff Harp, a former FBI special agent, said in an interview with CBS News that “there is a directive to over-communicate with all the different agencies out there” about potential threats.

    “If they have any inkling that there is information out there, they’re going to broadcast it,” he said. “It doesn’t have to be 100% accurate. But what they want to get out there is at least a warning to make sure that there is some preparation and notice that goes out.”

    Officials in California have said they are vigilant but aren’t aware of any immediate threats.

    In a statement, the Los Angeles Police Department said: “At this time, there are no known or specific threats to Los Angeles.” It added that it “continues to monitor global events and any potential related threats that could impact Los Angeles.”

    Newsom’s office told CBS News the memo was “one of numerous security updates the state receives from federal partners daily and disseminates to local law enforcement and emergency responders.”

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/no-known-specific-threat-underpinning-fbi-alert-iran-targeting-california-officials/

  • 乔·罗根持续凸显特朗普最大软肋


    作者:亚伦·布莱克
    1小时17分钟前发布
    2026年3月11日,美国东部时间下午6:34

    乔·罗根在6月7日新泽西州纽瓦克保诚中心举行的UFC 316赛事中观赛。
    艾尔莎/盖蒂图片社/档案照

    如果说有一个人物最能体现唐纳德·特朗普总统在2024年拼凑获胜联盟的能力,那可能就是乔·罗根——这位有影响力的播客主持人在选举前夕采访特朗普后对其表示支持,引发了轩然大波。

    (相反,大量报道都在讨论卡玛拉·哈里斯竞选团队为何没有安排她参加罗根的播客,以及这可能对她的总统竞选造成的不利影响。)

    16个月后的今天,罗根却凸显了特朗普维系这一联盟的困境。

    自2025年年中以来,罗根在几个重大问题上与特朗普产生了分歧。民调显示,他关注的这些问题恰好是特朗普最大的政治软肋——包括与伊朗的战争、杰弗里·爱泼斯坦案件以及移民执法问题。

    伊朗

    这一重大新议题是与伊朗的战争。罗根周二表示,特朗普对伊朗的持续军事打击违背了他对选民的承诺。

    “但根据他竞选时的主张,这似乎太荒谬了,”罗根说,“我是说,这就是为什么很多人感到被背叛,对吧?他竞选时承诺不再发动战争,特别是这些愚蠢无意义的战争,但现在我们却卷入了一场连明确缘由都无法说清的战争。”

    早在2025年1月尼古拉斯·马杜罗被驱逐前,罗根就对特朗普针对委内瑞拉的计划持怀疑态度。但他表示那次行动至少“干净利落”。推翻马杜罗的军事行动仅持续了几个小时,而与伊朗的战争已持续近两周,且看不到明确结束迹象。

    “这在我看来完全没有意义——除非我们是在为他人利益行动,尤其是以色列的利益,”罗根补充道,“这在我看来完全说不通。”

    几乎所有民调都显示,与伊朗的战争不受欢迎,多数民众反对,独立选民反对的比例约为2:1。事实上,这可能是很长一段时间以来最不受欢迎的新军事冲突。

    乔·罗根在唐纳德·特朗普总统宣誓就任美国第47任总统后接受祝福。
    索尔·勒布/联合通讯社/路透社

    爱泼斯坦案件

    数月来,罗根一直对特朗普政府处理爱泼斯坦案件的方式表示怀疑。

    与伊朗问题类似,他将此事视为对特朗普支持者的背叛,甚至暗示正是因为支持者相信特朗普如果当选会公开爱泼斯坦相关材料,才支持了他。

    “有很多事情,你知道,当我们认为特朗普会进来解决很多问题。我们要‘ draining the swamp(清除腐败)’,我们要弄清楚所有事情,”罗根在去年7月说道,“而当你有一个大家一直谈论的核心原则,然后他们却试图在这一点上对你进行‘煤气灯操纵’(心理暗示)?”

    上个月,他称联邦调查局声称没有证据表明爱泼斯坦有客户“是我这辈子听过的最离谱的‘煤气灯操纵’言论”。

    两天后的2月12日,他抨击司法部奇怪且前后矛盾的信息删改做法。

    “这是什么?这太糟糕了。这对政府没有任何好处,”罗根说,“这看起来他妈的糟透了。太糟糕了。”

    罗根特别批评特朗普将此事称为“骗局”,甚至暗示特朗普可能知道爱泼斯坦的所作所为。

    “当特朗普说这一切都不真实、都是骗局时,这对他来说看起来很糟糕。这不是骗局,”罗根补充道,“你不知道吗?如果你愿意善意解读,也许他不知道。但这绝对不是骗局。”

    1月份的一项CNN民调显示,只有6%的美国人对联邦政府迄今为止公布的爱泼斯坦案件相关文件感到满意。

    上月更近期的路透社-益普索民调显示,65%的美国人认为联邦政府“可能”或“肯定”在隐瞒关于爱泼斯坦死亡(被裁定为自杀)的信息,75%的人认为政府“可能”或“肯定”在隐瞒其所谓客户的信息。

    移民政策

    罗根还发表了越来越多批评特朗普移民打击政策的言论。

    这一问题在去年4月正式爆发,当时他称特朗普政府将无证移民送往萨尔瓦多一家残酷监狱的做法“令人发指”。

    到7月,他将政府针对无犯罪记录移民的行动称为“疯狂”。

    “不是贩毒集团成员、不是帮派成员、不是毒贩,就只是在建筑工地出现的建筑工人,然后被突袭,”罗根说,“还有园丁。真的吗?”

    当月晚些时候,罗根谴责美国公民被卷入突袭行动,以及特朗普试图驱逐具有合法身份的亲巴勒斯坦活动人士。

    “很多完全无辜的人会被牵连进来。他们已经被牵连了,”罗根说,“你知道,他们已经被这样做了。”

    10月中旬,他表示人们有理由担忧近年来失控的边境越境问题。但他补充道:“我认为军队上街是一个危险的先例。”

    他还批评政府“将父母从社区中拆散”,并补充道:“我从未想过会在电视上经常看到这种场景。”

    “我真以为他们只会打击罪犯,”他说。

    罗根还批评政府在1月份明尼阿波利斯市造成了蕾妮·古德和亚历克斯·普雷蒂的死亡事件。

    “在我看来这一切都错得离谱,”他谈到古德之死时说,“在我看来这太可怕了。”

    他甚至提及盖世太保(纳粹德国秘密警察)。

    “然后我也能理解一些人的观点,‘是啊,但你不希望武装人员在街头随意抓捕人,其中很多人实际上是美国公民’,”他说,“他们只是没带证件而已。我们真的要变成盖世太保吗?‘你的证件呢?’我们已经沦落到这个地步了吗?”

    特朗普在移民问题上的支持率从一年前的正10个百分点跌至如今的负10个百分点——很大程度上是因为美国民众也认为他的政府执法行动过于激进。

    特别是古德和普雷蒂的死亡事件,促使政府在选举年暗示将改变政策方向。

    关税

    这一直是特朗普最不受欢迎的议题之一。尽管罗根没有像其他问题那样频繁或激烈地评论,但他也对特朗普的策略提出了质疑。

    一年前特朗普对加拿大发动关税战时,罗根称此举“愚蠢”。

    “我们得重新和加拿大成为朋友。这太荒谬了,”罗根说,“我不敢相信现在存在反美、反加情绪。这是最愚蠢的他妈的争端。”

    他在下个月补充道:“我对关税政策感到害怕,因为这是根本性的改变。”

    出人意料的是,特朗普没有回击罗根。

    上个月被问及罗根的批评时,特朗普告诉NBC新闻,他们最近有过交谈。

    “我认为他是个很棒的人,我觉得他也喜欢我,”特朗普说。

    他补充道:“而且,你知道,喜欢我并不重要。问题是——我认为我们做得非常出色,但我认为我们不擅长公关。”

    Joe Rogan keeps highlighting Trump’s biggest liabilities

    Analysis by Aaron Blake
    1 hr 17 min ago
    PUBLISHED Mar 11, 2026, 6:34 PM ET

    Joe Rogan looks on during UFC 316 at the Prudential Center on June 7 in Newark.

    Elsa/Getty Images/File

    If there’s one figure who epitomized President Donald Trump’s ability to cobble together a winning coalition in 2024, it might have been Joe Rogan — the influential podcaster who made big news by endorsing Trump on the eve of the election after interviewing him.

    (On the flipside, much ink has been spilled about the Kamala Harris campaign not booking a date with Rogan’s podcast and the detrimental effect that might have had on her bid to become president.)

    Sixteen months later, Rogan epitomizes Trump’s problems in holding that coalition together.

    Rogan has broken with Trump on several major issues since mid-2025. And polling shows the issues he’s picked happen to be some of Trump’s biggest political liabilities – including the war with Iran, the Jeffrey Epstein files and immigration enforcement.

    Iran


    The big, new one is the war with Iran. Rogan said Tuesday that Trump’s ongoing assault on the country broke his promises to his voters.

    “But it just seems so insane based on what he ran on,” Rogan said. “I mean, this is why a lot of people feel betrayed, right? He ran on no more wars and these stupid senseless wars, and then we have one that we can’t even really clearly define why we did it.”

    Rogan had also been skeptical of Trump’s plans to target Venezuela before the ouster of Nicolas Maduro back in January. But he said that operation was at least “clean.” The military engagement to bring in Maduro lasted only a few hours, as opposed to the war with Iran, which is nearly two weeks old with no clear end in sight.

    “It just doesn’t make any sense to me – unless we’re acting on someone else’s interests, like particularly Israel’s interests,” Rogan added. “It just didn’t make any sense to me.”

    Nearly every poll shows the war with Iran is unpopular, with a majority opposing it and independents opposing it around 2-to-1. In fact, it might be the most unpopular new military conflict in a very long time.

    Joe Rogan stands for a benediction after President Donald Trump was sworn in as the 47th US President in the US Capitol Rotunda.

    Saul Loeb/Pool/Reuters

    Epstein


    Rogan has for months expressed incredulity about the Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files.

    Similar to Iran, he’s cast it as a betrayal of Trump’s supporters, even suggesting that their belief Trump would make Epstein materials public if he won the election was a part of why they backed him.

    “There’s a lot of stuff about, you know, when we thought Trump was going to come in and a lot of things are going to be resolved. We’re going to drain the swamp. We’re going to figure everything out,” Rogan said in July. “And when you have this one hardcore line in the sand that everybody’s been talking about forever, and then they’re trying to gaslight you on that?”

    Last month, he called the FBI’s claim that there is no evidence Epstein had clients “the gaslightiest gaslighting sh*t I’ve ever heard in my life.”

    Two days later, on February 12, he took aim at the Justice Department’s strange and inconsistent redactions practices.

    “Like, what is this? This is not good. None of this is good for this administration,” Rogan said. “It looks f**king terrible. It looks terrible.”

    Rogan criticized Trump in particular for referring to the matter as a “hoax,” and even entertained the idea that Trump knew what Epstein had been doing.

    “It looks terrible for Trump when he was saying that none of this was real, this is all a hoax. This is not a hoax,” Rogan added. “Like, did you not know? Maybe he didn’t know, if you want to be charitable. But this is definitely not a hoax.”

    A January CNN poll found just 6% of Americans said they were satisfied with what the federal government had released of the Epstein files to that point.

    A more recent Reuters-Ipsos poll from last month showed 65% of Americans said the federal government was “probably” or “definitely” hiding information about Epstein’s death, which was ruled a suicide, and 75% said it was “probably” or “definitely” hiding information about his supposed clients.

    Immigration


    Rogan has also amassed a growing volume of comments critical of Trump’s immigration crackdown.

    It really kicked off in April, when he called the Trump administration’s sending undocumented migrants to a brutal El Salvador prison “horrific.”

    By July, he called the administration’s targeting of immigrants without criminal records “insane.”

    “Not cartel members, not gang members, not drug dealers, just construction workers showing up in construction sites and raiding them,” Rogan said. “Gardeners. Like, really?”

    Later that month, Rogan decried how US citizens were getting caught up in the raids, and how Trump was trying to deport pro-Palestinian activists with legal status.

    “A bunch of people that are totally innocent are going to get caught up. They already have been,” Rogan said. “You know, they have been.”

    In mid-October, he said people were right to be concerned about out-of-control border-crossings in recent years. But he added that, “The military in the street, I think, is a dangerous precedent.”

    He also criticized the administration for “ripping parents out of their communities,” adding: “I did not ever anticipate seeing that on TV on a regular basis.”

    “I really thought they were just going to go after the criminals,” he said.

    Rogan went on to criticize the administration for the killings of both Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis in January.

    “It just seemed all kinds of wrong to me,” he said of Good’s death, adding that it “just looked horrific to me.”

    And he even invoked the Gestapo, the secret police in Nazi Germany.

    “And then I can also see the point of view of the people who say, ‘Yeah, but you don’t want militarized people in the streets just roaming around snatching people up, many of which turn out to actually be US citizens,’” he said. “They just don’t have their papers on them. Are we really going to be the Gestapo? ‘Where’s your papers?’ Is that what we’ve come to?”

    Trump’s approval numbers on immigration have gone from about 10 points positive a year ago to about 10 points negative today – in large part because the American people also see his administration’s enforcement operations going too far.

    The killings of Good and Pretti, in particular, have resulted in the administration signaling a change of course in an election year.

    Tariffs


    This has been one of Trump’s most unpopular issues for a long time. And while Rogan hasn’t spoken about it as much or as forcefully, he has called Trump’s strategy into question.

    When Trump launched his tariffs against Canada a year ago, Rogan called the move “stupid.”

    “We got to become friends with Canada again. This is so ridiculous,” Rogan said. “I can’t believe there is anti-American, anti-Canadian sentiment going on. It’s the dumbest f**king feud.”

    He added the next month: “I’m scared of this tariff stuff because it’s radical change.”

    Uncharacteristically, Trump hasn’t hit back at Rogan.

    Asked about Rogan’s criticisms last month by NBC News, Trump said they had spoken recently.

    “I think he’s a great guy, and I think he likes me, too,” Trump said.

    He added: “And, you know, liking me isn’t important. What happens is that — I think we do a phenomenal job, but I don’t think we’re good at public relations.”

  • 两党住房推动取得进展,但特朗普支持的投资者禁令面临阻力


    行业团体警告,特朗普支持的条款可能导致”建后出租”(build-to-rent)开发项目停滞,进而减少住房供应

    作者:亚历克斯·米勒
    福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年3月11日 美国东部时间晚上7:06

    [常识解决方案:民主党和共和党联手应对住房危机]

    纽约州民主党众议员乔希·莱利(Josh Riley)和北卡罗来纳州共和党人帕特·哈里根(Pat Harrigan)讨论两党如何努力实现美国梦。

    新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

    收听本文
    3分钟

    [](https://beyondwords.io/?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com&utm_medium=player&utm_campaign=7893)

    参议院周三进一步推进一项旨在提高住房可负担性的全面住房法案,但一项由特朗普支持的禁止机构投资者购买独栋住宅的条款正成为争议焦点。

    议员们周三扫清了该法案的另一道程序障碍,为周四离开华盛顿前可能进行的最终投票铺平了道路。

    《21世纪住房法案》上月以390票对9票的两党支持在众议院通过。该立法包含一系列旨在增加经济适用房供应的措施。

    图片43:占位符

    [众议院通过两党住房法案,特朗普聚焦可负担性危机]

    图片44:佛罗里达州多拉的唐纳德·特朗普

    2026年3月9日,星期一,佛罗里达州多拉的特朗普国家多拉迈阿密度假村,唐纳德·特朗普总统在新闻发布会上就对伊朗的军事打击发表讲话。(马克·谢费尔宾/美联社照片)

    参议院银行、住房和城市事务委员会主席蒂姆·斯科特(R-S.C.)与该委员会的最高民主党人伊丽莎白·沃伦(D-Mass.)联手在参议院推进并修改该法案。

    “当唐纳德·特朗普总统、伊丽莎白·沃伦以及参议院共和党人都能在住房法案上达成共识时,这表明如果我们搁置党派政治,专注于影响美国民众的问题,就能取得成果,”斯科特在接受CNBC” Squawk Box”采访时表示。

    在原始版本中,该法案主要旨在帮助首次购房者和低收入美国人进入住房市场或获得更多负担得起的住房选择。

    [两党计划旨在让数百万首次购房者重新实现美国梦]

    图片45:蒂姆·斯科特在国会山

    2025年2月27日星期四,南卡罗来纳州共和党议员蒂姆·斯科特在迪尔森大楼参加参议院银行、住房和城市事务委员会确认听证会。(汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ-滚动呼叫公司通过盖蒂图片社)

    但最初的法案缺乏特朗普想要的一项关键政策:禁止对冲基金或大型企业等机构投资者购买独栋住宅。特朗普今年早些时候签署了一项行政命令禁止此类行为,并在国情咨文演讲中敦促国会将其法典化。

    “我要求国会将这一禁令永久化,因为住房是为人民提供的——事实上,这才是我们想要的,”特朗普说,”我们要的是人民的住房,不是企业的住房。”

    图片46:占位符

    斯科特和沃伦在法案中加入了这一条款。如果通过,该一揽子计划还将纳入《住房道路法案》(ROAD to Housing Act)中的若干政策,该法案是参议院另一项此前陷入停滞的住房提案。

    该条款将禁止大规模投资者购买独栋住宅,并要求超过特定所有权门槛的公司在七年内剥离相关资产。

    [支持特朗普的团体发布关键住房倡议蓝图,重点突出顶级 MAGA 影响力人物]

    图片47:夏威夷州民主党参议员布莱恩·沙茨

    夏威夷州民主党参议员布莱恩·沙茨警告称,参议院两党住房一揽子计划存在”问题”。(比尔·克拉克/CQ-滚动呼叫公司通过盖蒂图片社)

    但机构投资者禁令引起了部分参议院民主党人和行业利益相关者的担忧,他们认为这可能会导致”建后出租”(build-to-rent)住房项目减少。

    夏威夷州民主党参议员布莱恩·沙茨在参议院表示,该法案”存在问题”。他辩称,禁止企业和对冲基金购买独栋住宅的条款被写成了一种”会迫使任何拥有并出租超过350套单户住宅或联排别墅的人在七年内出售”的形式。

    “这简直没有任何道理,”沙茨说,”问题在于这项条款的措辞方式是为了针对对冲基金问题,但他们写错了。”

    “所以,机构投资者的定义实质上是说,任何拥有并运营超过350套出租单元的人——这太荒谬了,”他继续说道。

    住房和租赁行业的几位成员在给斯科特和沃伦的信中写道,七年期条款将”实际上关闭’建后出租’开发项目,导致住房供应减少,租房者选择更少”。

    亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字版撰写美国参议院报道的记者。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6388402266112
    https://beyondwords.io/?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com&utm_medium=player&utm_campaign=7893

    Bipartisan housing push advances, but Trump-backed investor ban faces resistance

    Industry groups warn Trump-backed provision could shut down build-to-rent development and reduce housing supply

    By Alex Miller
    Fox News

    Published March 11, 2026 7:06pm EDT

    [COMMON SENSE SOLUTION’: Democrats and Republicans come together to help the housing crisis]

    Rep. Josh Riley, D-N.Y., and Pat Harrigan, R-N.C., discuss ways both parties are trying to make the American dream achievable.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    [](https://beyondwords.io/?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com&utm_medium=player&utm_campaign=7893)

    The Senate moved closer Wednesday to advancing a sweeping housing package aimed at boosting affordability, but a Trump-backed provision banning institutional investors from buying single-family homes is emerging as a flashpoint.

    Lawmakers cleared another procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, setting up a likely final vote before they leave Washington on Thursday.

    The Housing for the 21st Century Act passed the House last month in a 390-9 bipartisan vote. The legislation includes a wide-ranging slate of measures designed to increase the supply of affordable housing.

    Image 43: placeholder

    [HOUSE PASSES BIPARTISAN HOUSING BILL AS TRUMP ZEROES IN ON AFFORDABILITY CRISIS]

    Image 44: Donald Trump Doral, Florida

    President Donald Trump speaks about the military strikes against Iran, at a news conference, Monday, March 9, 2026, at Trump National Doral Miami in Doral, Florida.(Mark Schiefelbein/AP Photo)

    Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., the chair of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., its top Democrat, teamed up to advance and modify the bill in the Senate.

    “When President Donald Trump and Elizabeth Warren and Senate Republicans can all come to the same place on a housing bill, it shows that if you put partisan politics aside and focus on the issues impacting the American people, you can get results,” Scott told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”

    In its original form, the legislation was primarily intended to help first-time homebuyers and lower-income Americans enter the housing market or gain access to more affordable housing options.

    [BIPARTISAN PLAN AIMS TO MAKE THE AMERICAN DREAM AFFORDABLE AGAIN FOR MILLIONS OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS]

    Image 45: Tim Scott on Capitol Hill

    Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., arrives for a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee confirmation hearing in Dirksen building on Thursday, February 27, 2025.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    But the initial bill lacked a key policy Trump wanted: a ban on institutional investors, such as hedge funds or large corporations, buying single-family homes. Trump earlier this year signed an executive order banning the practice and urged Congress to codify it during his State of the Union address.

    “I’m asking Congress to make that ban permanent because homes for people — really, that’s what we want,” Trump said. “We want homes for people, not for corporations.”

    Image 46: placeholder

    Scott and Warren added that provision to the bill. If passed, the package would also incorporate several policies from the ROAD to Housing Act, a separate Senate housing proposal that previously stalled.

    The provision would prohibit large-scale investors from purchasing single-family homes and would require companies that exceed a certain ownership threshold to divest within seven years.

    [PRO-TRUMP GROUP UNLEASHES BLUEPRINT FOR CRUCIAL HOUSING INITIATIVE FEATURING TOP MAGA INFLUENCER]

    Image 47: Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii

    Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, warned that they was a “problem” with the Senate’s bipartisan housing package.(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    But the institutional investor ban is drawing concerns from some Senate Democrats and industry stakeholders, who argue it could eliminate build-to-rent housing units.

    Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said on the Senate floor that “there is a problem” with the bill. He argued the ban on corporations and hedge funds buying single-family homes was written in a way that would force “anybody who owns and rents out more than 350 units, single family or duplexes” to sell after a seven-year period.

    “There’s literally no reason for this,” Schatz said. “And the problem is that it was written in such a way that it was trying to capture the hedge fund problem, but they wrote it wrong.”

    [CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP]

    Image 48: placeholder

    “And so the definition of institutional investor says, essentially, anyone who owns and operates more than 350 units to rent — that’s bananas,” he continued.

    Several members of the housing and rental industry wrote in a letter to Scott and Warren that the seven-year clause would “effectively shut down build-to-rent development, leading to less supply and fewer options for renters.”

    Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6388402266112
    https://beyondwords.io/?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com&utm_medium=player&utm_campaign=7893

  • 特朗普倾向支持科宁,随后泄密风波骤起——帕克斯顿上演“天才之举”


    2026-03-11T21:04:50.128Z / CNN

    By

    [Alayna Treene]

    ,

    [Lauren Fox]

    2小时前

    发布于 2026年3月11日,美国东部时间下午5:04

    唐纳德·特朗普 国会新闻 参议院领导层

    [查看全部主题]

    Facebook 推文[邮件]链接 线程

    链接已复制!

    2026年3月11日,俄亥俄州雷丁市,唐纳德·特朗普总统参观赛默飞世尔科技公司设施。

    Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

    知情人士向CNN透露,总统唐纳德·特朗普上周曾倾向于支持德克萨斯州共和党参议员约翰·科宁。但在他的意向被泄露给媒体后,他和一些高级顾问感到沮丧,计划陷入停滞。

    随后,科宁的对手、德克萨斯州总检察长肯·帕克斯顿上周五宣布,如果参议院通过总统的投票限制法案——特朗普近几周对此法案尤为关注——他将[考虑退出决选]。帕克斯顿明确表示,共和党应取消阻挠议事规则(filibuster)才能实现这一点,而这一想法遭到许多共和党参议员的反对。

    正如一位特朗普官员描述的那样,白宫官员将这一策略视为“天才之举”,它至少暂时让帕克斯顿继续留在竞选中。现在,特朗普已将支持其高优先级“拯救美国法案”(SAVE America Act)的通过与自己的背书联系起来——该法案除其他内容外,还将实施新的选民ID要求。

    这对参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩来说是个不小的麻烦,他认为科宁在初选中获胜是保持共和党参议院多数地位的重要支柱;对共和党整体而言,这场备受争议的12周决选尚未开始,就已有约1亿美元投入到这场激烈的初选活动中。

    尽管特朗普在社交媒体上暗示他将“很快”支持决选中的候选人,并希望在自己表态后其他候选人退选,但白宫官员表示总统并不急于做出决定。尽管科宁和帕克斯顿阵营以及参议院共和党领袖都施加了巨大压力,特朗普还是在整个初选期间推迟了背书。

    [科宁在上周的初选中险胜帕克斯顿],但两人均未获得足够的50%选票以避免决选。退出两人角逐的截止日期是3月18日下午5点(中部时间)。

    2026年3月3日,德克萨斯州总检察长肯·帕克斯顿(左)和参议员约翰·科宁在各自的初选夜观察活动中。

    AP/Getty Images

    如今,在帕克斯顿最后通牒的推动下,特朗普发现,将潜在的科宁背书与推动参议院共和党人消除60票门槛(以通过立法)挂钩,对其而言是一个有效的激励手段。由于民主党不会支持该法案,它要想在参议院通过,唯一途径是共和党改变阻挠议事规则。该法案已在众议院通过。

    数月来,图恩和其他人一直推动特朗普支持科宁,希望避免一场艰难的德克萨斯州大选耗尽他们本应用于其他关键参议院席位的资源。帕克斯顿有诸多负面记录,包括已和解的证券欺诈调查、州众议院的弹劾案以及不忠指控。

    白宫和图恩的办公室拒绝置评。Politico首先报道称[特朗普希望利用他的背书]向参议员施压以推动投票法案。

    科宁至少似乎愿意让步。在周三的《纽约邮报》专栏中,他表示,尽管过去曾反对改变阻挠议事规则,但他的同事们应“采纳任何必要的修改”以通过特朗普的投票限制法案。

    “求生本能是强大的,”一位支持科宁的共和党消息人士告诉CNN,指的是这篇专栏文章。

    科宁周三坚称,他的想法因“民主党前所未有的阻挠”而改变,而非为了获得特朗普的背书。

    “我不知道总统是否有任何意图或是否会做出任何背书。我显然会欢迎它。但时间表,无论何时发生,完全由他决定,”科宁说。

    据知情人士透露,科宁的专栏文章尚未打动特朗普,他仍坚决要确保“拯救美国法案”通过。与此同时,消息人士称,总统对图恩越来越不满,图恩公开抵制特朗普要求参议院共和党人“废除”阻挠议事规则的呼吁。

    2026年3月11日,参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩在美国国会大厦与记者交谈。

    Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    这种紧张局势使特朗普与图恩产生分歧,尽管两人在总统第二任期内关系密切,每周会交谈数次,但在特朗普认为对共和党中期选举胜利至关重要的问题上,两人意见不合。除了新的选民ID要求外,特朗普还希望该法案包括对邮寄投票的限制以及对未成年人变性身份手术的禁令。

    “总统决心通过‘拯救美国法案’,”一位白宫高级官员告诉CNN,“他期望国会的盟友们完成这项任务。”

    一些特朗普顾问认为,图恩最近的言论——他反复坚称废除阻挠议事规则是不可能完成的任务,尽管他计划下周就特朗普的投票法案进行投票——给其党内许多成员提供了“无所作为”的借口,一位知情人士在谈到相关讨论时表示。

    “科宁参议员是53名共和党参议员之一,而反对废除阻挠议事规则的呼声在我们党内根深蒂固,正如你所知,”图恩周三上午告诉记者。

    其他人也很快为图恩辩护,称他的立场代表了[参议院共和党人中广泛存在的观点]。

    “在60票门槛下没有成功的路径。废除阻挠议事规则也没有路径。那么我们为什么不把时间花在更有成效的事情上呢?”北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯表示。

    周三,特朗普在回应图恩对废除阻挠议事规则的犹豫时告诉记者,这位南达科他州参议员“必须成为一名领导者。他是一名领导者,必须推动大家(废除阻挠议事规则)。”

    CNN的达娜·巴什和阿莱特·塞恩兹对此报道有贡献。

    唐纳德·特朗普 国会新闻 参议院领导层

    [查看全部主题]

    Facebook 推文[邮件]链接 线程

    链接已复制!

    Trump leaned toward endorsing Cornyn. Then the leaks started — and Paxton made a ‘genius move’

    2026-03-11T21:04:50.128Z / CNN

    By

    [Alayna Treene]

    ,

    [Lauren Fox]

    2 hr ago

    PUBLISHED Mar 11, 2026, 5:04 PM ET

    Donald Trump Congressional news Senate leadership

    [See all topics]

    Facebook Tweet[Email]Link Threads

    Link Copied!

    President Donald Trump attends a tour of a Thermo Fisher Scientific facility in Reading, Ohio, on March 11, 2026.

    Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

    President Donald Trump was gravitating toward endorsing Texas GOP Sen. John Cornyn last week. But he and some top advisers grew frustrated after his intentions leaked to the press, sources familiar with the matter told CNN, and the plan stalled.

    Then Cornyn’s opponent, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, announced on Friday that if the Senate passed the president’s voting restrictions bill — something Trump has grown particularly fixated on in recent weeks — he would [consider dropping out of the runoff race]. Paxton specified the GOP should lift the filibuster to do so, an idea many Republican senators oppose.

    White House officials viewed the ploy as a “genius move,” as one Trump official described it, and it kept Paxton in the mix, at least temporarily. Now, Trump has latched onto the idea of tying his endorsement to the passage of his high-priority “SAVE America Act” — which, among other things, would impose new voter ID requirements.

    Ad Feedback

    That’s a significant headache for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who sees a Cornyn primary win as an important pillar of keeping the GOP’s Senate majority, and for the larger party, which has already seen around $100 million sunk into a bruising primary campaign before the contentious, 12-week runoff has even started.

    And while Trump has teased on social media that he’s endorsing in the runoff “soon,” and that he wants the other candidate to drop out once he does so, White House officials maintain that the president is not in a rush. Trump held out on an endorsement for the entire primary campaign, despite intense pressure campaigns from the Cornyn and Paxton camps as well as Senate GOP leaders.

    [Cornyn narrowly edged out Paxton in the primary race] last week, but neither got the requisite 50% of votes to avoid a runoff. The deadline to withdraw from the two-man race is March 18 at 5 p.m. CT.

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, left, and Sen. John Cornyn at their respective primary election night watch events on March 3, 2026.

    AP/Getty Images

    Now, egged on by Paxton’s ultimatum, Trump has found dangling a potential Cornyn endorsement to be a useful motivator for Senate GOP leaders, who have been unwilling so far to eliminate the required 60-vote threshold to advance the legislation. Since Democrats won’t back the bill, the only way it would clear the Senate is if Republicans change filibuster rules. The legislation has already passed the House.

    For months, Thune and others have pushed Trump to endorse Cornyn, hoping to prevent a difficult Texas general election from siphoning away resources they want to use for other crucial Senate races. Paxton has a lot of baggage, including a since-settled securities fraud investigation, an impeachment by the state House and allegations of infidelity.

    The White House and Thune’s office declined to comment. Politico first reported that [Trump wanted to use his endorsement] to pressure senators on the voting bill.

    Cornyn seems willing to capitulate, at least. In an [op-ed in the New York Post] Wednesday, he said his colleagues should adopt “whatever changes … may prove necessary” to pass Trump’s voting restrictions bill — despite past comments opposing a change to filibuster rules.

    “The survival instinct is a powerful one,” a GOP source who supports Cornyn told CNN, referring to the op-ed.

    The Texas senator insisted Wednesday that his thinking had changed due to “the unprecedented obstruction by Democrats,” not to get Trump’s endorsement.

    “I don’t know whether the president has any intention or not of making any endorsement. I would obviously welcome it. But the timeline, if or when it happens, is entirely up to him,” Cornyn said.

    There’s no sign yet that Cornyn’s op-ed has moved Trump, according to the sources familiar with the matter, who is still dead set on seeing the “SAVE America Act” pass. Meanwhile, the president has grown particularly frustrated with Thune, the sources said, who has been publicly resisting Trump’s calls for Senate Republicans to nuke the filibuster.

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune talks with reporters at the US Capitol on March 11, 2026.

    Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    The dynamic has put Trump and Thune, who have grown close throughout the president’s second term in office and speak several times a week, at odds on an issue Trump views as crucial to a GOP win in the midterm elections. In addition to new voter ID requirements, Trump also wants the bill to include restrictions on mail-in voting and a ban on transgender identity surgeries for minors.

    “The president is hellbent on passing the ‘SAVE America Act,’” one senior White House official told CNN. “He expects his allies in Congress to get the job done.”

    Some Trump advisers view Thune’s recent comments — he has repeatedly insisted that getting rid of the filibuster is an impossible task, though he plans to put Trump’s voting bill up for a vote next week — as giving many members of his conference an out to do nothing, one source familiar with the talks said.

    “Sen. Cornyn is one of 53 Republican senators and the opposition to nuking the filibuster runs very, very deep in our conference, as you know,” Thune told reporters Wednesday morning.

    Others are also quick to defend Thune, arguing his position represents a [widely shared view among the Senate GOP].

    “There is no path to success with a 60-vote threshold. There is no path to nuking the filibuster. So why don’t we spend our time more productively on things we can get done?” Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina said.

    Trump, addressing Thune’s reticence to gutting the filibuster on Wednesday, told reporters the South Dakota senator has “got to be a leader. He’s a leader, he’s got to get them.”

    CNN’s Dana Bash and Arlette Saenz contributed to this report.

    Donald Trump Congressional news Senate leadership

    [See all topics]

    Facebook Tweet[Email]Link Threads

    Link Copied!

    Ad Feedback

  • 特朗普政府采取措施征收新关税,宣布对主要贸易伙伴展开调查


    2026年3月11日 / 美国东部时间下午7:31 / CBS新闻

    华盛顿— 特朗普政府周三宣布,将对多个美国贸易伙伴的贸易做法展开新的调查。此前,上月美国最高法院推翻了特朗普总统部分关税政策,这可能导致更多关税的征收。

    美国贸易代表杰米森·格里尔表示,美国将调查欧盟、新加坡、瑞士、挪威、印度尼西亚、马来西亚、柬埔寨、泰国、韩国、越南、中国台湾地区、孟加拉国、墨西哥、日本和印度存在的”结构性产能过剩”问题——即一国生产的商品超出其合理消费能力。

    特朗普总统正依据《1974年贸易法》第301条,该条款允许美国贸易代表办公室在认定外国对美国实施不公平贸易壁垒时,单方面对其进行报复。该法律要求联邦政府首先对该国的贸易做法展开调查。

    格里尔表示,结构性产能过剩违规可能导致国内工资被抑制,并持续设置市场准入壁垒。

    格里尔称,周三宣布的这一举措将刊登在《联邦公报》上,”只是一个开始”。

    “我们预计在这一过程结束时,能够更精确地阐述美国面临的挑战,这些挑战源于我们一些贸易伙伴存在的结构性产能过剩问题,”格里尔在宣布前的记者电话会议上表示。

    格里尔还指出,美国将很快对约60个贸易伙伴国家发起单独的第301条调查,以确保这些国家禁止进口使用强迫劳动生产的商品。他表示,政府还预计将”针对特定国家”发起其他第301条调查。

    格里尔强调,美国已与其中许多国家达成的贸易协定,与这些调查”相互独立”。

    在最高法院裁定特朗普总统无权依据《国际紧急经济权力法》单方面征收关税后,总统宣布对全球商品征收10%的临时关税,期限最多为150天,依据的是不同条款第122条。这些关税将在期限结束时到期,除非国会延长。特朗普后来表示将把这一税率提高到15%,但白宫尚未正式确认这一5个百分点的上调。

    格里尔称,政府的目标是在7月临时关税到期前完成新的第301条调查,但他也表示无法预先确定调查需要多长时间。

    特朗普在2018年其第一个任期内曾依据第301条对中国征收关税,当时美国贸易代表认定中国在贸易问题上对美国不公平,特别是在技术转让和知识产权方面。前总统拜登拒绝终止对中国的关税,甚至在2024年对中国电动汽车、半导体、太阳能电池及其他产品加征了新关税。

    Trump administration takes steps to impose new tariffs, announcing investigations into key trading partners

    March 11, 2026 / 7:31 PM EDT / CBS News

    Washington— The Trump administration on Wednesday announced new investigations into the trading practices of a number of U.S. trading partners, which could lead to more tariffs after the Supreme Court struck down some of President Trump’s tariffs last month.

    U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. will investigate concerns of “structural excess capacity” — manufacturing more goods than a country can reasonably consume — in the European Union, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Indonesia, Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, South Korea, Vietnam, Taiwan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Japan and India.

    President Trump is relying on Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to unilaterally retaliate against countries if the U.S. determines they’ve imposed unfair trade barriers against the U.S. The law requires the federal government to first conduct an investigation into the country’s trade practices.

    Structural excess capacity violations could result in the suppression of domestic wages and sustained market access barriers, Greer said.

    Greer said Wednesday’s announcement, which will be published in the Federal Register, was “just an initiation.”

    “We expect at the end of this process to be able to articulate with even more precision some of the challenges that face the United States because of structural excess capacity among some of our trading partners,” Greer told reporters on a call ahead of the announcement.

    Greer said the U.S. will also soon launch separate Section 301 investigations into around 60 trading partner countries to ensure they’re prohibiting the import of goods made with forced labor. Greer said the administration also expects to launch the other Section 301 investigations “on a country-specific basis.”

    Greer said the trade deals the U.S. already has in place with many of these countries are “independent” of these investigations.

    After the Supreme Court ruled that President Trump lacks the authority to unilaterally impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the president announced a global tariff rate of 10% for up to 150 days, relying on a different code, Section 122. These tariffs will expire at the end of that period of time, unless they’re extended by Congress. Mr. Trump later said he would increase that rate to 15%, although the White House hasn’t made that 5-point increase official.

    Greer said the administration’s goal is to conclude the new Section 301 investigations before the clock runs out on the temporary tariffs in July, but he also said he can’t predetermine how long the investigations will take.

    Mr. Trump used Section 301 in 2018 to impose tariffs on China during his first term in office, after the U.S. trade representative determined China was treating the U.S. unfairly in trade matters, particularly related to technology transfer and intellectual property. Former President Joe Biden declined to end the China tariffs, and even added new tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, semiconductors, solar cells and other products in 2024.

  • 美能源部长:将从战略石油储备释放1.72亿桶石油


    2026年3月12日 07:49 / 联合早报

    美国释放战略石油储备,是国际能源署释放4亿桶石油的计划的一部分。 (路透社档案照片)

    美国能源部长赖特周三说,美国将从战略石油储备中释放1亿7200万桶石油,以期降低因美以伊战争造成的供应冲击而飙升的油价。

    赖特星期三(3月11日)说,美国释放战略石油储备是国际能源署(IEA)32个成员国当天早些时候达成的释放4亿桶石油计划的一部分。

    赖特指出,释放工作将于下周开始,预计需要120天左右才能完成。

    国际能源署周三早些时候宣布,32个成员国一致同意释放4亿桶战略石油储备,以应对因美国和以色列军事打击伊朗导致全球石油供应紧张的局面。

    美国、荷兰、拉脱维亚、爱沙尼亚和立陶宛都是国际能源署成员国。

    美国总统特朗普周三接受媒体采访时透露,将“稍微”减少战略石油储备以降低油价,并称会再次补充战略石油库存。

    美能源部长:将从战略石油储备释放1.72亿桶石油

    2026年3月12日 07:49 / 联合早报

    美国释放战略石油储备,是国际能源署释放4亿桶石油的计划的一部分。 (路透社档案照片)

    美国能源部长赖特周三说,美国将从战略石油储备中释放1亿7200万桶石油,以期降低因美以伊战争造成的供应冲击而飙升的油价。

    赖特星期三(3月11日)说,美国释放战略石油储备是国际能源署(IEA)32个成员国当天早些时候达成的释放4亿桶石油计划的一部分。

    赖特指出,释放工作将于下周开始,预计需要120天左右才能完成。

    国际能源署周三早些时候宣布,32个成员国一致同意释放4亿桶战略石油储备,以应对因美国和以色列军事打击伊朗导致全球石油供应紧张的局面。

    美国、荷兰、拉脱维亚、爱沙尼亚和立陶宛都是国际能源署成员国。

    美国总统特朗普周三接受媒体采访时透露,将“稍微”减少战略石油储备以降低油价,并称会再次补充战略石油库存。

  • 特朗普政府请求最高法院终止海地人受保护身份


    2026年3月11日 下午6:59 UTC / 路透社

    华盛顿特区,2026年1月12日,日出光线照射着美国最高法院大楼。路透社/乔纳森·恩斯特/资料图片 [购买授权,新标签页打开]

    • 摘要
    • 诉讼称:政府对非白人移民怀有敌意
    • 法官称:这一指控”看似极有可能”
    • 案件涉及:临时保护身份(TPS)分类

    3月11日(路透社)- 尽管海地持续发生暴力事件导致超过100万人流离失所,总统唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)的政府周三向美国最高法院请求干预,试图剥夺居住在美国的35万多名海地人的人道主义驱逐保护措施。

    司法部在一份紧急请求中要求最高法院推翻一名法官的裁决,该裁决阻止了政府终止海地人临时保护身份(Temporary Protected Status,简称TPS)的行动。法官认定,政府对海地人的行为可能部分出于”种族仇恨”。

    路透社伊朗简报通讯为您提供伊朗战争最新动态和分析。注册获取 [此处链接保留原样]

    广告 · 继续滚动阅读

    特朗普任命的前国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆(Kristi Noem)于2025年11月裁定,海地不存在”阻止海地移民返回加勒比国家的特殊和临时情况”。美国国务院目前警告不要前往海地,原因是”绑架、犯罪、恐怖主义活动、民众骚乱和医疗资源有限”。

    大规模驱逐:自2025年1月重返白宫以来,这位共和党总统推行大规模驱逐政策,试图剥夺部分移民原本由美国政府出于人道主义提供的临时法律保护,扩大了可能被驱逐者的范围。

    在特朗普任内,国土安全部已着手终止约12个国家的TPS身份,称该政策”本就应是临时性的”。

    最高法院在10月允许政府终止数十万委内瑞拉移民的TPS身份。2月,政府也向法院申请终止约6,100名居住在美国的叙利亚人的TPS身份。

    司法部在海地案件的文件中表示,下级法院”再次试图以损害国家利益和外交关系的方式阻止重大行政部门政策举措”。

    与叙利亚案件一样,政府暗示最高法院应受理并审理基本法律问题,因为”TPS终止的断断续续诉讼已成为常态”。

    “除非法院解决这些争议的是非曲直——这些问题现在已在全国法院得到审理——否则这种不可持续的循环将一次次重复,滋生更多相互冲突的裁决和对本法院临时命令的不同解读,”司法部写道。

    临时保护身份适用于因祖国经历自然灾害、武装冲突或其他特殊事件而符合条件的人,为合格移民提供工作许可和临时驱逐保护。

    海地人于2010年在民主党前总统巴拉克·奥巴马(Barack Obama)任内首次获得TPS身份,此前海地发生毁灭性地震。

    美国政府多次延长这一身份,最近一次是在民主党前总统乔·拜登(Joe Biden)任内,当时引用了”经济、安全、政治和健康危机同时爆发”,这一危机由帮派活动和政府瘫痪加剧。这一延长使居住在美国的海地人获得保护直至2026年2月3日。

    根据国际移民组织的数据,超过140万海地人因暴力和不稳定局势流离失所。

    特朗普于3月5日解雇了诺姆,此前数月因包括联邦官员在明尼阿波利斯开枪打死两名美国公民,以及议员质疑为宣传她及其部门的2.2亿美元广告合同等争议不断。诺姆被解职时,其TPS相关决定并未成为争议焦点。

    对非白人移民的敌意


    美国地区法官安娜·雷耶斯(Ana Reyes)2月2日在海地人提起的集体诉讼中裁定,诺姆可能违反了终止海地移民受保护身份所需的程序,以及美国宪法第五修正案规定的法律平等保护条款。

    “原告指控诺姆部长预先确定了终止决定,且这是出于对非白人移民的敌意。这一指控看似极有可能,”雷耶斯写道。

    雷耶斯还提到诺姆2025年12月的社交媒体帖子:”克里斯蒂·诺姆有权用她想要的任何不当词汇称呼移民为杀手、寄生虫、 entitlement junkies(注:此处保留英文术语或译为‘特权索取者’)等。然而,诺姆部长受宪法和《行政程序法》约束,必须在实施TPS项目时忠实于事实与法律。”

    哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院3月6日驳回了政府暂停法官裁决的请求。

    最高法院要求原告在下周一前对政府的申请作出回应。

    特朗普政府已紧急请求最高法院允许实施被下级法院阻碍的政策。自特朗普重返总统职位以来,最高法院在大多数此类案件中均支持政府。

    纽约报道:安德鲁·钟(Andrew Chung);特德·赫森(Ted Hesson)和内特·雷蒙德(Nate Raymond)补充报道;威尔·邓纳姆(Will Dunham)编辑

    我们的标准:汤森路透信托原则 [新标签页打开]

    Trump administration asks Supreme Court to end Haitian protected status

    March 11, 2026 6:59 PM UTC / Reuters

    Light from the rising sun hits the U.S. Supreme Court building at the start of the day in Washington, D.C. U.S., January 12, 2026. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo [Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab]

    • Summary
    • Lawsuit says administration hostile to nonwhite immigrants
    • Judge says that claim “seems substantially likely”
    • Case involves Temporary Protected Status classification

    March 11 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump’s administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to intervene in its effort to strip humanitarian deportation protections from more than 350,000 Haitians living in the United States despite persistent violence in ​Haiti that has displaced more than a million people.

    The Justice Department in an emergency request asked the court to lift a judge’s decision that blocked the ‌administration’s move to end Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, for Haitians. The judge found that the administration’s action toward the Haitians likely was motivated in part by “racial animus.”

    The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Kristi Noem, a Trump appointee then serving as secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, determined in November 2025 that there were “no extraordinary and temporary conditions” in Haiti that would prevent Haitian migrants from returning to the Caribbean country. The U.S. State Department currently warns against travel to Haiti “due ​to kidnapping, crime, terrorist activity, civil unrest and limited healthcare.”

    MASS DEPORTATIONS The Republican president, pursuing a policy of mass deportations since returning to office in January 2025, has moved ​to strip certain migrants of temporary legal protections previously provided to them by the U.S. government for humanitarian reasons, expanding the pool of possible ⁠deportees.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Under Trump, the Department of Homeland Security has moved to end TPS status for about a dozen countries, saying it was always meant to be temporary.

    The Supreme Court in October let the ​administration terminate TPS for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan migrants. The administration in February also asked the court to allow it to strip TPS status from about 6,100 Syrians living in the United States.

    The Justice ​Department in its filing in the Haiti case said lower courts were “again attempting to block major executive-branch policy initiatives in ways that inflict specific harms to the national interest and foreign relations.”

    As it did in the Syria case, the administration suggested that the Supreme Court take up and hear arguments on the underlying legal issue given that “stop-and-start litigation over TPS terminations has become endemic.”

    “Unless the court resolves the merits of these challenges – issues that ​have now been ventilated in courts nationwide – this unsustainable cycle will repeat again and again, spawning more competing rulings and competing views of what to make of this court’s interim orders,” the ​Justice Department wrote.

    Temporary Protected Status is available to people whose home country has experienced a natural disaster, armed conflict or other extraordinary event. It provides eligible migrants with work authorization and temporary protection from deportation.

    Haitians ‌were first given ⁠TPS in 2010 under Democratic former President Barack Obama after a devastating earthquake struck their country.

    The U.S. government repeatedly extended the status, most recently under Democratic former President Joe Biden’s administration, which cited “simultaneous economic, security, political and health crises” in Haiti, fueled by gangs and a lack of a functioning government. That extension had given Haitians living in the United States protections through February 3, 2026.

    More than 1.4 million Haitians have been displaced by violence and instability, according to the International Organization for Migration.

    Trump fired Noem on March 5 after months of controversy including the fatal shootings of two ​U.S. citizens by federal officers in Minneapolis and ​questions by lawmakers about a $220 million advertising ⁠contract for a campaign promoting her and her department. Noem’s TPS decisions were not at issue in her dismissal.

    ‘HOSTILITY TO NONWHITE IMMIGRANTS’


    U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes ruled, opens new tab on February 2 in a class-action lawsuit brought by Haitians challenging the administration’s move. Reyes found that Noem likely violated the procedures required ​to terminate the protected status of Haitian immigrants as well as the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law.

    “Plaintiffs ​charge that Secretary Noem preordained ⁠her termination decision and did so because of hostility to nonwhite immigrants. This seems substantially likely,” Reyes wrote.

    Referencing a December social media post by Noem, Reyes added, “Kristi Noem has a First Amendment right to call immigrants killers, leeches, entitlement junkies and any other inapt name she wants. Secretary Noem, however, is constrained by both our Constitution and the (Administrative Procedure Act) to apply faithfully the facts to the law ⁠in implementing the ​TPS program.”

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on March 6 rejected the administration’s bid to ​pause the judge’s ruling.

    The Supreme Court requested a response from the plaintiffs to the administration’s filing by next Monday.

    Trump’s administration has asked the Supreme Court on an emergency basis to allow implementation of policies impeded by lower courts. The Supreme ​Court has sided with Trump in most of these cases since he returned to the presidency.

    Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Additional reporting by Ted Hesson and Nate Raymond; Editing by Will Dunham

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 美国2月预算赤字持平于3080亿美元,关税收入尚未受最高法院裁决影响


    2026年3月11日 美国东部时间下午6:05 / 路透社

    节点运行失败

    图片(路透社档案照片,2020年12月17日,美国华盛顿,美国国会大厦圆顶倒映在水洼中。路透社/Erin Scott/档案图片,获取使用授权,新标签页打开)

    华盛顿,3月11日(路透社) – 美国2月预算赤字与去年同期基本持平,为3080亿美元,收入和支出增长基本均衡,而唐纳德·特朗普总统时期征收的关税收入尚未体现美国最高法院上月对其多项关税政策裁决不利的影响。

    2月收入为3130亿美元,较去年同期增长170亿美元,增幅6%;当月支出总额为6210亿美元,较2025年2月增长170亿美元,增幅3%。月度同比数据反映了特朗普政府执政的首个完整月份情况。

    路透社《伊朗简报》新闻通讯为您提供伊朗战争最新动态与分析。点击此处注册

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    美国财政部一位官员表示,收入增长部分得益于2月个人预扣所得税增加150亿美元,部分反映了2025年年终奖金的支付。但这一增长被70亿美元的公司退税和60亿美元的个人退税所抵消,后者是由于去年共和党通过的减税立法导致。

    报告显示,2月净关税收入略有减少,降至266亿美元,1月为277亿美元,而去年最后几个月超过300亿美元。

    但财政部官员表示,预算数据很大程度上未反映关税削减情况,因为最高法院裁定根据《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)征收的关税非法,美国海关与边境保护局从2月24日起停止对进口商品征收此类关税。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    该官员称,目前尚不清楚任何IEEPA关税退税将如何体现在数据中。

    报道:David Lawder;编辑:Andrea Ricci

    我们的标准:路透社信托原则,[新标签页打开]

    US February budget deficit flat at $308 billion as tariff revenues not yet hit by court ruling

    March 11, 2026 6:05 PM UTC / Reuters

    节点运行失败

    The U.S. Capitol dome is seen reflected in a puddle in Washington, U.S., December 17, 2020. REUTERS/Erin Scott/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    WASHINGTON, March 11 (Reuters) – The U.S. budget deficit for February was nearly flat with a year earlier at $308 billion as growth in ​receipts and outlays were largely even, with receipts from ‌President Donald Trump’s tariffs not yet reflecting the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling against many of his duties last month.

    February receipts came in at $313 ​billion, up $17 billion or 6% from a year earlier, ​while outlays for the month totaled $621 billion, up $17 billion ⁠or 3% from February 2025. The year-on-year monthly comparison ​reflected the first full month in the Trump administration.

    The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Receipt growth was ​driven in part by a $15 billion increase in individual withheld income taxes in February, partly reflecting the payment of 2025 year-end bonuses, a Treasury ​official said. This was offset by a $7 billion increase in ​corporate tax refunds and a $6 billion increase in individual tax refunds driven ‌by ⁠last year’s Republican-passed tax cut legislation.

    The report showed a slight cooling of net customs duties in February to $26.6 billion, compared with $27.7 billion in January and over $30 billion in the final months ​of last year.

    But ​the Treasury ⁠official said the budget data largely does not reflect tariff reductions due to the Supreme Court’s ​decision to strike down duties under the International ​Emergency ⁠Economic Powers Act as illegal, as tariffs are generally paid a month in arrears. The Customs and Border Protection agency stopped ⁠assessing those ​tariffs on imports starting on February ​24.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    The official said it was unclear how any IEEPA tariff refunds would show ​up in the data.

    Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Andrea Ricci

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab