2026年4月21日 美国东部时间上午11:38 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
华盛顿讯——参议院共和党人周二公布一项预算决议，启动无需民主党协助即可为国土安全部下属移民机构提供资金的程序。
牵头参议院预算委员会的南卡罗来纳州共和党参议员林赛·格雷厄姆公布了这份58页的预算决议，并在一份声明中表示，共和党正在“推进而非倒退合理的移民政策，以保障我们的边境安全”。
格雷厄姆说：“共和党正在做一件必须迅速完成、且我们的民主党同僚试图阻止我们去做的事。这件事很简单：在美国面临巨大威胁之际，全面为边境巡逻队和移民海关执法局提供资金。”
该决议授权参议院司法委员会和国土安全委员会起草法案，将各自的开支最高增加700亿美元，这笔资金将用于为移民海关执法局和海关与边境保护局的部分部门提供拨款。参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩的一名助手在决议公布后不久表示，最终法案的总支出预计约为700亿美元。
这项举措是通过预算和解程序批准拨款的关键一步，该程序允许参议院共和党人在无需民主党投票的情况下推进具有直接预算影响的立法。共和党计划为这些机构提供3.5年的资金，确保在特朗普总统任期剩余时间内为移民执法提供资金保障。
数月来，民主党一直反对为移民海关执法局和海关与边境保护局提供资金，要求在1月份联邦探员在明尼阿波利斯发动两起致命枪击事件后进行改革。但在谈判未能达成协议后，参议院共和党人选择通过拨款程序为国土安全部的大部分部门提供资金，同时单独推进移民执法部门的拨款。
参议院共和党人最早有望在本周中期就预算决议开始投票，目标是在总统设定的6月1日截止日期前迅速将最终法案提交总统签署。
图恩上周晚些时候对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻表示，共和党“已经酝酿了一段时间”来制定这项预算决议，并且已经在和解程序中完成了“大量筹备工作”。他提到已与参议院议事规则裁决官——也就是负责判定任何条款是否违反参议院规则的议院规则守护者——进行了“多轮磋商”。
图恩对记者表示，和解计划并非“理想的行事方式”。
“我真的很遗憾民主党迫使我们走上这条道路，因为在我看来，拨款程序是为数不多——即便不是唯一——我们应该能够以两党合作方式完成的事务之一，”图恩说道。
为国土安全部移民执法机构提供资金的计划已成为更广泛的国土安全部拨款审批的核心议题。尽管总统已采取措施临时为国土安全部员工支付薪酬，但该部门自2月14日以来已陷入停摆。参议院一致通过了不为移民海关执法局和海关与边境保护局提供资金、仅为国土安全部大部分部门拨款的方案，但众议院共和党人迄今不愿效仿。
图恩与众议院议长迈克·约翰逊本月早些时候宣布达成一项协议，通过拨款程序为国土安全部的大部分部门提供资金，通过和解程序为移民海关执法局和海关与边境保护局提供资金。但一些众议院共和党人反对在和解程序完成前推进相关工作。而随着一场关于关键国家安全监控法案重新授权的争议困扰众议院，推进国土安全部拨款似乎并未成为当务之急。
约翰逊上周表示，在参议院采取行动后，众议院共和党人将“履行我们的职责，为政府这些必要职能提供资金，然后我们再处理国土安全部的其余拨款事宜”。
图恩表示，他希望如果参议院“能够展示进展和成果”并在本周推进该法案，众议院将推进国土安全部其余部门的拨款工作。他说，他和约翰逊定期进行沟通，白宫也参与了相关磋商。
“随着我们启动这一程序：先通过预算决议，随后推出和解法案，其中将包含我认为与议长以及众议院同僚磋商过的所有内容。他们清楚我们的目标所在，”图恩说道。
多名共和党人呼吁在和解一揽子计划中加入其他优先事项，这给法案的快速通过增加了复杂性。当被问及众议院共和党人是否可能要求增加附加条款时，图恩表示“他们可以这么做”。
“我们的议员们有其他诉求，”图恩说。“我的意思是，我也有其他诉求。但显然我们这里有明确的使命和目标，那就是确保这些在国土安全和国家安全方面发挥重要职能的政府重要机构获得资金支持。”
Senate Republicans unveil budget resolution, kickstarting reconciliation process to fund ICE
April 21, 2026 11:38 AM EDT / CBS News
Washington — Senate Republicans unveiled a budget resolution on Tuesday to begin the process of funding immigration agencies under the Department of Homeland Security without help from Democrats.
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who leads the Senate Budget Committee, released the 58-page budget resolution, saying in a statement that Republicans are “moving forward — not backward — on rational immigration policies that secure our border.”
“Republicans are doing something that must be done quickly, and that our Democrat colleagues are trying to prevent us from doing. That something is simple: fully fund Border Patrol and ICE at a time of great threat to the United States,” Graham said.
The resolution authorizes the Senate Judiciary and Homeland Security committees to draft legislation to increase spending by up to $70 billion each, which would be used to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and parts of Customs and Border Protection. The final bill’s price tag is expected to be around $70 billion total, an aide to Senate Majority Leader John Thune said shortly after the resolution was released.
The measure is a key step toward approving the funding through the budget reconciliation process, which allows Senate Republicans to advance legislation with direct budgetary consequences without Democratic votes. Republicans are aiming to fund the agencies for 3.5 years, guaranteeing funds for immigration enforcement through the remainder of the Trump presidency.
For months, Democrats have opposed funding ICE and CBP, seeking reforms following two deadly shootings by federal agents in Minneapolis in January. But after talks failed to yield an agreement, Senate Republicans opted to fund the bulk of DHS through the appropriations process, while moving funding for immigration enforcement separately.
Senate Republicans are aiming to begin voting on the budget resolution as early as midweek, with a goal of moving quickly to get the final bill to the president’s desk by the June 1 deadline he set.
Thune told CBS News late last week that Republicans have been working on the budget resolution “for some time” and have done “a lot of the prep work” in the reconciliation process already. He pointed to “a number of conversations” with the Senate parliamentarian, the chamber’s rulekeeper who will determine whether any provision violates Senate rules.
Thune told reporters that the reconciliation plan isn’t the “ideal way to do this.”
“I really regret that the Democrats have forced us down this path, because in my view, the appropriations process is one of the, maybe not many, but at least few things that we ought to be able to do around here in a bipartisan way,” Thune said.
The plan to fund DHS’ immigration enforcement agencies has become central to the approval of funding for the department more broadly. Though the president has moved to temporarily pay DHS employees, the department has been shut down since Feb. 14. The Senate unanimously approved the plan to fund the bulk of DHS without ICE or CBP funding, but House Republicans have so far been unwilling to do the same.
Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson announced an agreement earlier this month to fund most of DHS through appropriations and ICE and CBP through reconciliation. But some House Republicans have opposed moving forward until the reconciliation process is complete. And as a fight over the reauthorization of a key national security surveillance law plagues the lower chamber, moving forward with the DHS funding hasn’t appeared to be a top priority.
Johnson said last week that after the Senate acts, House Republicans will “do our part and fund those essential functions of the government, and then we’ll do the rest of Homeland Security.”
Thune said he’s hopeful that if the Senate “can show evidence and progress” and proceed to the bill this week, the House will move the funding for the rest of DHS forward. He said he and Johnson have spoken regularly, and the White House has been involved in the conversations.
“As we initiate this process, the budget resolution, followed up with a reconciliation bill, what it will include are all elements that I think as we have talked with the speaker and folks in the House of Representatives. They understand where we’re going,” Thune said.
A number of Republicans have called for additional priorities to be added to a reconciliation package, complicating its swift passage. On the possibility that House Republicans could ask for add-ons, Thune said “they could.”
“We have members who want other things,” Thune said. “I mean, I want other things. But obviously we have a specific mission and purpose here and that is to ensure that these important agencies of our government that have vital functions when it comes to our homeland and national security are funded.”