请您提供需要翻译的英文新闻文章，我会按照要求为您完成精准翻译。
No English content available
作者： root
-
特朗普无视共和党反叛，议员们试图与其划清界限
2026-06-05T09:00:00.000Z / 《华盛顿邮报》
面对近期的挫折，尤其是国会共和党人的抵制，这位总统表现出愤怒的反抗态度，称将提名不受欢迎的托德·布兰奇担任司法部长，并拒绝承认其政治献金计划已告吹。
美国东部时间6月5日凌晨5:00 今日美国东部时间凌晨5:00
唐纳德·特朗普总统周四在椭圆形办公室出席煤炭相关活动时发表讲话。（朱莉娅·德马雷·尼基森/美联社照片/朱莉娅·德马雷·尼基森）
作者：艾萨克·恩斯多夫与娜塔莉·艾莉森
唐纳德·特朗普总统正以一种漠不关心又充满敌意的态度应对与国会共和党人之间不断扩大的分歧，拒不回应他们对其有争议的提名以及与国税局达成的和解协议的担忧——这些问题正让立法进程陷入困境，并加剧华盛顿的紧张局势。
Trump unfazed by GOP revolt as lawmakers seek political distance
2026-06-05T09:00:00.000Z / The Washington Post
The president has reacted to recent setbacks, notably the resistance of congressional Republicans, with angry defiance, saying he’ll nominate the unpopular Todd Blanche as attorney general and refusing to admit his payout fund is dead.
June 5, 2026 at 5:00 a.m. EDT Today at 5:00 a.m. EDT
President Donald Trump speaks at an event about coal on Thursday in the Oval Office. (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/Ap Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
By Isaac Arnsdorf and Natalie Allison
President Donald Trump is reacting with a blend of indifference and hostility to a widening rift with congressional Republicans, declining to accommodate their concerns about his controversial nominees or IRS settlement that are complicating legislation and raising tensions in Washington.
-
报告：超四成美国人经济依赖父母 两成人自认永难实现财务独立
2026年6月5日 17:31 / 联合早报
（纽约彭博电）受通货膨胀和股市波动对家庭财务造成压力影响，近半数美国人仍需要父母提供经济支持，其中包括33%的X世代人群。
美国西北互助人寿保险公司（Northwestern Mutual）的报告显示，在18岁以上的美国人中，42%的人称自己在经济上依赖父母。更值得关注的是，20%的美国人认为自己可能永远无法实现经济独立。尽管每一代人的年龄、职业阶段和财务状况各不相同，但这一现象在美国各个世代中均有存在。
根据西北互助公司的定义，经济依赖父母指依靠双亲资助自己的大部分生活开支。
西北互助公司的私人财富顾问鲁普雷希特表示，通胀和生活成本上升，尤其是住房成本上涨推高了日常支出，让人们更难实现经济独立。与此同时，裁员以及人工智能（AI）对就业市场的冲击，也让部分美国人更难找到工作，不得不依赖父母提供经济支持。
鲁普雷希特建议储蓄者专注于增强财务韧性，而非追求单一的投资回报。他说，太多人以“完美规划”的心态看待退休，而非优先考虑稳步推进，这使得他们在生活不如预期时，更容易受到冲击。
他指出，出生于1965年至1980年的X世代尤其令人担忧，他们即将退休，但仍在依赖父母的经济支持。他说，这一代人中有太多人需要父母接济来改善住房条件或支付子女的教育费用。
（图片来源：Pixabay）
报告：近半美国人啃老 需父母提供经济支持
2026年6月5日 17:31 / 联合早报
报告：近半美国人啃老 需父母提供经济支持
美国西北互助人寿保险公司的报告显示，18岁以上的美国人当中，42%称自己在经济上依赖父母。更引人关注的是，20%美国人认为自己可能永远无法实现经济独立。 （Pixabay）
（纽约彭博电）由于通货膨胀和股市波动给家庭财务带来压力，近半数美国人仍依赖父母提供经济支持，其中包括33%的X世代人群。
美国西北互助人寿保险公司（Northwestern Mutual）的报告显示，18岁以上的美国人当中，42%称自己在经济上依赖父母。更引人关注的是，20%美国人认为自己可能永远无法实现经济独立。虽然每一代人的年龄、职业阶段和财务状况各不相同，但上述现象却存在于美国每一世代中。
根据西北互助公司的定义，经济依赖父母即依靠双亲来资助自己的大部分生活开销。
西北互助公司的私人财富顾问鲁普雷希特指出，通胀和生活费上升，尤其是住房成本上涨推高了日常支出，使人们更难实现经济独立。与此同时，裁员以及人工智能（AI）冲击就业市场，也使一些美国人更难找到工作，须依赖父母提供经济支持。
鲁普雷希特建议储蓄者专注于增强财务韧性，而不是追求单一的投资回报。他说，太多人抱着“完美规划”的心态看待退休，而不是优先考虑稳步前进，这使得他们在生活不如预期时，更容易受到冲击。
他指出，出生于1965年至1980年的X世代尤其令人担忧，他们即将退休，但仍然依赖父母的经济支持。他说，这一代人当中，有太多人需要父母接济来改善住房或支付子女的教育费。
-
特朗普政府升级法律攻势，索要跨性别未成年人医疗记录
2026-06-05T09:00:07.999Z / 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）
- 特朗普政府正在得克萨斯州使用大陪审团传票，要求获取接受性别确认护理的跨性别未成年人的敏感医疗记录。
- 两党联邦法官此前曾驳回类似请求，称此类举动是为了恐吓医院。
- 家长和维权人士担心，政府可能会利用这些记录报复那些接受相关治疗的儿童的家庭。
本文由AI生成摘要，并经CNN编辑审核。
特朗普政府对跨性别未成年人敏感医疗记录的索要正面临法院新一轮审查，该政府正加大力度，通过得克萨斯州的大陪审团迫使性别确认护理服务提供者配合。
去年，两党总统任命的法官在多起案件中叫停了最初使用的所谓行政传票获取信息的做法，他们表示，政府正在对性别确认护理进行毫无根据的钓鱼式调查。
为了绕过这些阻碍，得克萨斯州的检察官——该州近几个月来对性别确认治疗展开了大规模刑事调查——如今正通过大陪审团传票索要部分记录。此举中，他们使用了历来难以挑战的工具来获取观察者认为对当前调查并非必要的信息，这令维权人士和接受此类治疗的未成年人感到担忧。这类治疗在联邦层面并不违法，但在众多共和党领导的州已受到严格限制。
负责此次调查的沃斯堡唯一一名联邦法官是里德·奥康纳，他是乔治·W·布什任命的法官，其保守派立场在 LGBTQ 权利相关案件中尤为凸显。
“这不同寻常，”长期从事刑事辩护工作的乔治城大学法学院教授阿贝·史密斯说道，“我想不出类似的情况。”
史密斯表示，官员们似乎正在利用其检察权“迫使人们配合特朗普政府对跨性别群体的敌意”。
几名儿童的家长正在纽约法院请求阻止医院披露他们的信息，他们在法庭文件中表示，担心自己的记录被披露后会遭到特朗普政府的报复。
“我害怕将我孩子的身份信息交给一个敌视跨性别群体的政府会带来什么后果。我担心他的名字会被列入跨性别者名单，仅仅因为接受了医疗护理就会遭到调查，”一名以莱利·罗伊身份出现的家长在声明中说道。
自第二任总统任期伊始，唐纳德·特朗普总统及其政府就将取缔这类护理列为优先事项。去年夏天，司法部首次向医生和诊所发出20多份行政传票时表示，其调查围绕医疗欺诈和虚假陈述等内容展开。
至少有两家医院公开表示，他们收到了美国北德克萨斯地区检察官办公室发出的大陪审团传票：纽约大学朗格尼医院和斯坦福大学露西尔·帕卡德儿童医院，这两家医院都曾运营为年轻人提供此类护理的项目。纽约大学在5月初宣布收到传票时表示，它是多家收到传票的医院之一。
针对纽约大学的传票要求提供该机构过去六年与性别确认治疗相关的大量详细记录，其中包括计费记录、保险索赔和诊断代码。
传票还要求医院移交更敏感的信息：“足以识别每一位接受变性手术的患者”的文件，以及与这些个体相关的“从初次咨询到最近一次治疗的”所有记录。它还强制医院提供有关家长为未成年子女授权接受此类护理的记录。
今年早些时候，在特朗普政府威胁要撤回该医院的联邦资金后，纽约大学停止为未成年人提供性别确认护理。其他医院也在华盛顿方面的压力下终止了相关项目。
斯坦福大学帕卡德儿童医院也在5月6日收到了类似的大陪审团传票，该医院表示，他们正在就如何遵守传票进行谈判，以“减轻对患者隐私的潜在侵犯”，包括提交检察官要求的匿名记录版本。
未来几天将举行三场主要的法庭听证会。
加利福尼亚州圣何塞的一名联邦法官将于周五举行紧急听证会，考虑是否应禁止斯坦福医院配合针对上月提起诉讼的六名患者的传票要求。
周二在马里兰州，一名此前曾驳回政府通过行政传票从华盛顿特区一家医院获取记录的法官，将考虑是否发布类似的全国性裁决。
周三，曼哈顿的一名法官将权衡纽约市医院接受性别确认护理的人士提出的请求，要求发布一项广泛裁决，禁止美国各地的医院配合索要此类敏感记录的大陪审团传票。
通过法庭文件和诉讼程序，司法部表示，除其他事项外，他们正在调查医疗机构是否非法推动跨性别未成年人使用跨性别激素疗法和延迟青春期的标签外用药。检察官还在调查提供此类治疗时是否存在欺诈性计费行为。
上个月在罗德岛州对一名法官讲话时，司法部律师布兰特利·迈尔斯表示，如果没有识别个体患者及其家长的记录，调查人员“无法完全确定违规范围、识别错误贴标或欺诈性计费的模式，或评估此类行为是否带有欺诈或误导意图”。
CNN已联系司法部征求置评。
大陪审团传票
大陪审团程序严格保密，受到检察官传票的个人或实体——检察官无需预先批准即可发出传票——通常不会透露自己收到了传票，尽管也没有明确禁止他们披露此类信息。
收到大陪审团传票的目标可以尝试撤销传票，但法院往往会尊重检察官为收集刑事起诉证据所做的努力。
然而，法律专家表示，试图阻止配合大陪审团传票的案件可能会得到去年一系列驳回类似信息行政传票的法院裁决的支持。
“我认为本届政府面临的挑战是，（善意的）推定已经因一些所谓调查问题的公开评论而受到了一定削弱，这些评论破坏了这种合法性推定，”长期从事白领辩护业务、包括处理传票诉讼的律师乔伊·博伊德·朗内克说道。
在上周针对这家位于帕洛阿尔托的医院提起的诉讼中，六名匿名人士表示，虽然他们不想阻碍得克萨斯州正在进行的调查工作，但索要包含患者姓名和治疗细节的敏感信息太过离谱。
“司法部一再以不同的法律标签索要同一类别的患者身份医疗记录，而法院一再认定，这些记录与司法部声称的（《食品、药品和化妆品法》）或欺诈理论没有充分关联，”代表患者的律师在法庭文件中写道，“政府不能仅仅通过将相同的患者数据要求重新包装为大陪审团程序来弥补这种不匹配。”
斯坦福帕卡德儿童医院的律师在本周的法庭文件中表示，该医院去年夏天最初收到了一份行政传票，但在上个月检察官突然撤回该传票并发出大陪审团传票时，尚未配合调查。
医院表示，司法部一直愿意接受经过详细编辑的记录，但如果提出质疑的患者胜诉则不然。检察官告诉医院，如果在加州法官那里胜诉，他们将要求奥康纳迫使医院提交非匿名版本的记录。
“禁令……可能会给原告带来最糟糕的情况，”医院律师写道。
在过去一年的近10起案件中，全国各地的联邦法官都驳回了索要此类记录的行政传票。其中一些裁决目前正在上诉中。
法官们对调查人员获取信息的必要性以及获取非匿名记录的意愿提出了质疑，即便患者和家长本人似乎并未受到刑事调查，非匿名记录也会导致他们的姓名和私密医疗记录被披露。
去年9月，前总统乔·拜登任命的约翰·春法官驳回了针对西雅图儿童医院的行政传票，他指出，司法部关于为何需要健康记录的证据“薄弱不堪”，司法部当时告诉他这是对联邦医疗犯罪的调查。他得出结论，似乎是在“作为通过施压运动终止未成年人性别相关护理的努力的一部分”来索要这些信息。
马萨诸塞州的明恩·J·容法官去年批评政府试图进行“钓鱼式调查”，因为政府没有提供“丝毫证据”表明波士顿儿童医院违反了任何联邦法律。
“显而易见，发出传票的真正目的是……骚扰和恐吓波士顿儿童医院，使其停止提供此类护理，并劝阻患者寻求此类护理，”法官写道。
上个月情况变得尤其糟糕，一名特朗普任命的罗德岛地区法官指责司法部恶意行事，当时司法部正试图维持对罗德岛医院发出的行政传票。
该医院一直在与政府谈判如何回应其要求，此时该州儿童权益倡导者要求玛丽·麦克罗伊法官介入撤销传票。几天前，官员们要求得克萨斯州沃斯堡的一名联邦法官下令医院配合传票，尽管当时医院正与政府进行谈判。
在5月12日的紧张听证会上，法官痛斥司法部律师在纠纷中的“误导性”操作，以及无法回答有关司法部为何最近将调查转移到沃斯堡的关键问题。她指出，鉴于那里唯一的联邦法官立场极为保守，沃斯堡是一个“有利的诉讼地”。
麦克罗伊强调了她对政府的不信任，她敦促任何正在与调查人员就传票事宜进行谈判的医院或供应商提出撤销传票的请求。
根据听证会记录，她表示政府“应该准备好应对数千份撤销动议——可能数万份，因为我不知道在了解本案的（处理）轨迹后，任何一方如何能依赖与司法部的对话，说他们正在配合调查”。
麦克罗伊最终撤销了该行政传票，但波士顿联邦上诉法院后来表示，在上诉期间，医院需要向奥康纳提交匿名版本的记录。
笼罩在这一切之上的一个问题是，为何检察官将大部分调查工作转移到沃斯堡，而不是在相关医院所在的司法管辖区进行。
麦克罗伊在试图阻止针对罗德岛医院的传票时聚焦于这一问题，她在裁决中写道，司法部认为他的法院“对其政治立场友好”。
就司法部律师而言，他们承认，虽然调查“确实在全国范围内展开”，但政府“并非简单决定将调查”放在沃斯堡，以便在那里寻求传票配合的命令。
“这里有大量的调查步骤，”他们在法庭文件中写道，表示“调查的几名对象和潜在目标”位于北德克萨斯州。但该部门也在法庭文件中强调，其调查“不是——也从来不是——针对寻求性别确认护理的患者或家长”。
Trump administration escalates legal push for medical records of trans minors
2026-06-05T09:00:07.999Z / CNN
- The Trump administration is using grand jury subpoenas in Texas to demand sensitive medical records of transgender minors receiving gender-affirming care.
- Federal judges from both parties had previously blocked similar requests, calling them efforts to intimidate hospitals.
- Parents and advocates fear the administration could use the records to retaliate against families whose children received the treatments.
AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.
The Trump administration’s demands for sensitive medical records of transgender minors are facing fresh scrutiny in court as it ramps up its efforts by using a grand jury in Texas to force providers of gender-affirming care to comply.
The initial use of so-called administrative subpoenas to get the information was shut down in case after case over the last year by jurists appointed by presidents from both parties who said the administration is conducting a baseless fishing expedition into gender-affirming care.
In an apparent bid to overcome those roadblocks, prosecutors in Texas, where a sprawling criminal investigation into gender-affirming treatments has sprung up in recent months, are now seeking some of the records through grand jury subpoenas. In doing so, they’re using a tool that’s historically difficult to challenge to get hold of information that observers say is not necessary for the kind of probe being carried out – alarming advocates and minors who receive the treatments, which is not illegal on the federal level but has been heavily restricted in a slew of GOP-led states.
The only federal judge in Fort Worth, where the probe is being carried out, is Reed O’Connor, a George W. Bush appointee whose conservative bona fides have been especially on display in cases over LGBTQ rights.
“This is unusual,” said Abbe Smith, a longtime criminal defense attorney and a professor at Georgetown Law. “I can’t think of an analogous situation.”
Smith said that officials appeared to be using their prosecutorial powers to “coerce people into complying with the Trump administration’s hostility toward trans people.”
Parents of several children who are asking a New York court to block their information from being turned from a hospital said in court papers they’re worried that having their records disclosed could expose them to retaliation by the Trump administration.
“I am afraid about what may result from releasing my child’s identity to an administration that is hostile to the transgender community. I fear that his name may go on a list of transgender people and that he will be investigated simply for receiving medical care,” one parent – identified as Riley Roe – said in their declaration.
President Donald Trump and his administration have made stamping out such care a priority since the earliest days of his second term. When the Justice Department first began issuing more than 20 administrative subpoenas to doctors and clinics last summer, it said its probes were centered around health care fraud and false statements, among other things.
At least two hospitals have said publicly that they’ve received a grand jury subpoena from the US Attorney’s Office in the Northern District of Texas: NYU Langone Hospitals and Stanford University’s Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital, both of which have operated programs to provide such care to young people. In announcing its subpoena in early May, NYU said it was among several that had received one.
The subpoena against NYU sought a slew of detailed records from the past six years related to the gender-affirming treatments provided by the institution. Among them are billing records, insurance claims and diagnostic codes.
It asked the hospital to turn over more sensitive information: documents “sufficient to identify every patient who underwent sex-rejecting procedures” and all the records related to those individuals “from initial consultation to the most recent treatment provided.” It also compelled the hospital to produce records pertaining to authorizations from parents for their minor children to receive such care.
NYU stopped providing gender-affirming care for minors earlier this year after the Trump administration threatened to pull federal funding from the hospital. Other hospitals have also ended their programs in the face of pressure from Washington.
Stanford’s LPCH was also hit with a similar grand jury subpoena on May 6, and the hospital has said that it’s in negotiations over how to comply in a way that would “mitigate potential intrusions on patient privacy,” including by turning over anonymized versions of the records sought by prosecutors.
There are now three major court hearings set over the next few days.
A federal judge in San Jose, California, will hold an emergency hearing on Friday to consider whether he should bar Stanford’s hospital from complying with the subpoena with respect to six patients who brought suit last month.
In Maryland on Tuesday, a judge who has previously rejected the government’s efforts to obtain records from a hospital in Washington, DC, through an administrative subpoena will consider whether to issue a similar nationwide ruling.
And Wednesday, a Manhattan judge will weigh a request from people who received gender-affirming care at hospitals in New York City for a broad ruling that would prevent hospitals around the US from complying with grand jury subpoenas for such sensitive records.
Through court filings and proceedings, the Justice Department has said that, among other things, it’s looking at whether providers have unlawfully pushed off-label use of drugs for cross-sex hormone therapy and to delay puberty in trans minors. Prosecutors are also probing whether possible fraudulent billing practices have occurred where the treatments have been provided.
Speaking to a judge in Rhode Island last month, DOJ attorney Brantley Mayers said that without having records identifying individual patients and their parents, investigators “cannot fully determine the scope of violation, identity patterns of misbranding or fraudulent billing, or assess whether the conduct was undertaken with intent to defraud or mislead.”
CNN has reached out to the Justice Department for comment.
Grand jury subpoenas
Grand jury proceedings are shrouded in secrecy and individuals or entities subjected to subpoenas from prosecutors – who can send them without needing to get pre-approval – do not typically reveal that they’ve been hit with one, though they’re not explicitly barred from making such a disclosure, either.
The target of a grand jury subpoena can attempt to quash it, but courts tend to defer to prosecutors working to gather evidence to bring a criminal case.
However, legal experts said the cases seeking to block compliance with the grand jury subpoenas are likely bolstered by the series of court rulings over the last year swatting down administrative subpoenas for similar information.
“I think this challenge for the current administration is that that presumption (of good faith) has been a little bit eroded by the public comments that have been made about some of the issues that are supposedly under investigation that undercut that presumption of legitimacy,” said Joy Boyd Longnecker, a longtime white collar defense attorney whose practice includes litigating subpoenas.
In their lawsuit brought against the Palo Alto-based hospital last week, the six anonymous individuals said that while they don’t want to impede the work of the ongoing investigation in Texas, requesting sensitive information containing patient names and details about their treatments is a step too far.
“DOJ has repeatedly sought the same category of patient-identifying medical records under shifting legal labels, and courts have repeatedly found that those records bear no adequate connection to DOJ’s asserted (Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act) or fraud theories,” lawyers representing the patients wrote in court papers. “The government cannot cure that mismatch simply by repackaging the same patient-data demands as grand jury process.”
Lawyers for Stanford’s LPCH said in court filings this week it was initially hit with an administrative subpoena last summer, but that it hadn’t yet complied when prosecutors abruptly withdrew it last month and issued the grand jury subpoena.
The hospital said that DOJ has been open to accepting records with detailed redactions, but not if the patients challenging the effort are successful in their case. Securing a win from the California judge, prosecutors told the hospital, would prompt them to ask O’Connor to force the hospital to turn over non-anonymized versions of the records.
“An injunction would … potentially result in the worst-case scenario for the plaintiffs,” the hospital’s lawyers wrote.
Across nearly 10 cases over the last year, federal judges around the country blocked administrative subpoenas for the records. Some of those rulings are now on appeal.
Judges took issue with both the investigators’ need for the information and its desire to get non-anonymized versions of the records, which would have prevented the names of patients and their parents, along with their intimate medical records, from being disclosed even though they themselves don’t appear to be under criminal investigation.
When Judge John Chun, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, blocked an administrative subpoena to Seattle Children’s Hospital in September, he pointed to “threadbare” evidence from the Justice Department for why it needed the health records for what it told him was a probe into a federal healthcare offense. It seemed, he concluded, that the information was being sought “as part of an effort to end gender-related care for minors” through a pressure campaign.
Judge Myong J. Joun in Massachusetts chastised the administration last year for going on an attempted “fishing expedition” when it had not offered “an iota of suspicion” that Boston Children’s Hospital had broken any federal laws.
“It is abundantly clear that the true purpose of issuing the subpoena is to … harass and intimidate BCH to stop providing such care, and to dissuade patients from seeking such care,” the judge wrote.
The situation turned especially ugly last month after a Trump-appointed district judge in Rhode Island accused the Justice Department of acting in bad faith as it sought to keep alive an administrative subpoena issued to Rhode Island Hospital.
The hospital had been in negotiations with the government over how to respond to its demands when the state’s child advocate asked Judge Mary McElroy to step in to quash the subpoena. A few days earlier, officials asked a federal judge in Fort Worth, Texas, to order the hospital to comply with the subpoena even as it was in the middle of talks with the hospital.
At a tense hearing on May 12, the judge ripped into DOJ lawyers for its “misleading” maneuvering in the dispute, as well as its inability to answer key questions about why the department had recently shifted its investigation to Fort Worth, which she described as a “favorable forum” given the fact that the only federal judge there is fiercely conservative.
Underscoring her mistrust with the government, McElroy urged any other hospital or provider in active talks with investigators over how to proceed with a subpoena to file requests to quash the subpoena.
The government, she said, according to a transcript of the proceeding, “should be prepared to field thousands of motions to quash – tens of thousands, maybe, because I don’t know how any party can rely on a conversation with the Department of Justice that they’re working on compliance given the (track) of this case.”
McElroy ultimately voided the administrative subpoena, but a federal appeals court in Boston later said the hospital needed to hand over anonymized versions of the records to O’Connor while appeals play out.
Hovering over all of this are questions about why prosecutors have shifted much of their work to Fort Worth instead of having it conducted in the judicial districts where the hospitals in question are located.
McElroy zeroed in on that issue when she attempted to block the subpoena for the Rhode Island hospital, writing in her decision that DOJ saw his court as being “friendly to its political positions.”
For their part, DOJ lawyers have conceded that while the investigation “is indeed nationwide in scope, the government did not simply decide that it would park the investigation” in Fort Worth so that it could seek orders there for compliance with the subpoenas.
“There are substantial investigative steps happening here,” they wrote in court papers, saying that “several subjects and potential targets of the investigation” are in northern Texas. But the department also stressed in court filings that its probe “is not – and has never been – an investigation of patients or parents” seeking gender-affirming care.
-
新闻
美国对华科技管制存潜在漏洞 中企或取得英伟达顶级晶片
2026年6月5日 17:56 / 联合早报美国对华科技管制存潜在漏洞 中企或取得英伟达顶级晶片
特朗普政府内部对对华AI晶片出口限制出现政策混乱，美国官员担忧相关漏洞可能让中国企业绕道第三国获取英伟达先进晶片。（彭博社／示意图）
美国官员过去一周陷入了一场不同寻常的争论：过去一年来美国对中国的科技政策究竟是什么。
彭博社引述知情人士说，这场争论围绕特朗普政府是否大幅缩小了对华科技产业的限制范围，幅度远远超出预期或能公开承认的程度。知情人士指出，这些潜在漏洞可能使阿里巴巴等中国公司得以在中国以外的大多数国家合法购买配备英伟达（Nvidia）最先进人工智能（AI）晶片的服务器。知情人士要求匿名，因为讨论内容属于机密。
星期天（5月31日）早上，这些对话意外浮上台面。美国商务部工业与安全局（Bureau of Industry and Security，简称BIS）发布一份极其不寻常的备忘录。作为负责半导体出口管制的BIS称，近期收到关于最初于2023年实施的对全球中国企业销售AI晶片的限制是否仍然有效的询问。BIS指出，“答案是肯定的”。
备忘录意外揭露出，特朗普政府内部数个月来围绕是否允许中国购买尖端技术的争论，已经导致相关政策呈现模糊不清、前后矛盾的状态，这正是一个攸关国家安全的重要领域。美国总统特朗普团队停止执行拜登政府对AI晶片出口的某些限制，但连贯一致的替代方案却付之阙如。
特朗普政府官员正在调查企业是否利用这一局面，向新加坡或马来西亚等地的中国公司运交先进AI晶片，例如英伟达的Blackwell处理器。若属实，这将直接违背白宫对中美科技竞争所宣示的政策立场。部分官员认为，BIS在2025年5月做出的政策决定，使得此类出货在该机构星期天发布公告前属于合法。目前尚不清楚此类交易是否真的发生。
星期天这项旨在“堵住漏洞”的行动，获得众议院中国问题特别委员会共和党籍主席约翰·穆勒纳尔（John Moolenaar）的赞扬。
民主党参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦（Elizabeth Warren）和安迪·金（Andy Kim）则是批评特朗普政府的政策，“可能无意中让美国最先进AI晶片流向了总部位于中国的公司”。
中国商务部发言人在例行记者会上就华盛顿封堵晶片“监管漏洞”一事回答提问时重申，中国一贯反对美国滥用出口管制。
据一名不愿具名的BIS官员称，该局坚称这一漏洞根本不存在。这位官员说，即使在星期天发布公告之前，如果企业在未获得华盛顿许可的情况下向中国企业运送AI晶片，也已违反了美国的出口管制规定。
美国对华科技管制存潜在漏洞 中企或取得英伟达顶级晶片
2026年6月5日 17:56 / 联合早报
美国对华科技管制存潜在漏洞 中企或取得英伟达顶级晶片
特朗普政府内部对对华AI晶片出口限制出现政策混乱，美国官员担忧相关漏洞可能让中国企业绕道第三国获取英伟达先进晶片。 （彭博社／示意图）
美国官员过去一周陷入了一场不同寻常的争论：过去一年来美国对中国的科技政策究竟是什么。
彭博社引述知情人士说，这场争论围绕特朗普政府是否大幅缩小了对华科技产业的限制范围，幅度远远超出预期或能公开承认的程度。知情人士指出，这些潜在漏洞可能使阿里巴巴等中国公司得以在中国以外的大多数国家合法购买配备英伟达（Nvidia）最先进人工智能（AI）晶片的服务器。知情人士要求匿名，因为讨论内容属于机密。
星期天（5月31日）早上，这些对话意外浮上台面。美国商务部工业与安全局（Bureau of Industry and Security，简称BIS）发布一份极其不寻常的备忘录。作为负责半导体出口管制的BIS称，近期收到关于最初于2023年实施的对全球中国企业销售AI晶片的限制是否仍然有效的询问。BIS指出，“答案是肯定的”。
备忘录意外揭露出，特朗普政府内部数个月来围绕是否允许中国购买尖端技术的争论，已经导致相关政策呈现模糊不清、前后矛盾的状态，这正是一个攸关国家安全的重要领域。美国总统特朗普团队停止执行拜登政府对AI晶片出口的某些限制，但连贯一致的替代方案却付之阙如。
特朗普政府官员正在调查企业是否利用这一局面，向新加坡或马来西亚等地的中国公司运交先进AI晶片，例如英伟达的Blackwell处理器。若属实，这将直接违背白宫对中美科技竞争所宣示的政策立场。部分官员认为，BIS在2025年5月做出的政策决定，使得此类出货在该机构星期天发布公告前属于合法。目前尚不清楚此类交易是否真的发生。
星期天这项旨在“堵住漏洞”的行动，获得众议院中国问题特别委员会共和党籍主席约翰·穆勒纳尔（John Moolenaar）的赞扬。
民主党参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦（Elizabeth Warren）和安迪·金（Andy Kim）则是批评特朗普政府的政策，“可能无意中让美国最先进AI晶片流向了总部位于中国的公司”。
中国商务部发言人在例行记者会上就华盛顿封堵晶片“监管漏洞”一事回答提问时重申，中国一贯反对美国滥用出口管制。
据一名不愿具名的BIS官员称，该局坚称这一漏洞根本不存在。这位官员说，即使在星期天发布公告之前，如果企业在未获得华盛顿许可的情况下向中国企业运送AI晶片，也已违反了美国的出口管制规定。
-
特朗普取得胜利：尽管共和党分歧加剧，参议院通过700亿美元移民执法资金法案
2026年6月5日 美国东部时间5:01 / 福克斯新闻频道
该和解法案将为美国移民与海关执法局（ICE）和边境巡逻队提供三年半的资金支持，随后将送交众议院审议
作者：亚历克斯·米勒，福克斯新闻
福克斯新闻首席国会通讯员查德·珀格拉姆在《底线》节目中报道了针对唐纳德·特朗普总统“反武器化基金”的反对声浪。
全新功能：您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
参议院共和党人成功结成统一战线，推动唐纳德·特朗普总统提出的约700亿美元移民执法法案通过，但经过一整天马拉松式投票后，共和党内部对总统议程的分歧暴露无遗。
这项旨在为未来三年半的移民与海关执法局和边境巡逻队提供资金的预算和解法案的通过，结束了参议院一场旷日持久的拉锯战，这场博弈始于美国历史上最长的政府停摆时期。
参议院共和党人全天都在重申这一立场，他们表示，参议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党参议员查克·舒默及民主党人拒绝在未附带大量改革方案的情况下为移民执法行动提供资金，最终迫使共和党采取行动。
数十名共和党反叛者未能永久废除特朗普颇具争议的20亿美元基金
2026年6月3日，唐纳德·特朗普总统在华盛顿白宫椭圆形办公室向媒体发表讲话。（曼德尔·恩根/法新社摄）
“民主党人不愿达成任何协议，最终干脆彻底离场，想必是因为他们认为，将这个问题留到11月大选对他们更有利，”参议院多数党领袖、南达科他州共和党议员约翰·图恩说道。
但当天及此前几周，参议院共和党人与特朗普政府之间不断加剧的裂痕几乎彻底破坏了整个立法进程。
起初，法案中包含为特朗普的舞厅提供10亿美元安保升级资金的条款，随后该条款被删除。
随后，美国司法部宣布将设立近20亿美元的“反武器化基金”，允许那些认为自己遭到政府 targeting的民众从这笔纳税人资金中提出索赔。
共和党人迫使特朗普颇具争议的20亿美元基金妥协后，推进移民执法资金法案
2026年2月3日，参议院卫生、教育、劳工与养老金委员会主席比尔·卡西迪在华盛顿国会山德克森参议院办公楼举行的听证会上质询美国国立卫生研究院主任贾扬塔·巴塔查里亚。（奇普·索莫德维拉/盖蒂图片社摄）
多名参议院共和党议员担忧，这笔资金可能会被2021年1月6日国会山骚乱中被定罪袭警的骚乱者挪用。
舒默和民主党人抓住这一争议点，在一整天马拉松式的“投票狂欢”系列投票中，试图永久废除该基金，尽管代理司法部长托德·布兰奇已承诺特朗普政府不会再推进该基金。
“我们能相信唐纳德·特朗普吗？他日复一日地对我们撒谎，当这笔资金能让他和他的家族获益时，我们能相信他不会伸出贪婪之手吗？绝对不可能，绝无可能，”舒默说道。
共和党借助移民执法资金法案，让特朗普颇具争议的20亿美元基金“彻底消失”
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6393105820112
民主党提出的多项修正案让共和党议员陷入艰难的连任困境，缅因州共和党议员苏珊·柯林斯、俄亥俄州共和党议员乔恩·赫斯特德以及阿拉斯加州共和党议员丹·沙利文都面临政治上的严峻挑战。
共和党议员也曾试图废除该基金，导致参议院会议厅内的紧张局势升级。
“局势并没有那么紧张，”路易斯安那州共和党议员约翰·肯尼迪说道，“我的意思是，我见过更糟的场面。至今还没人拿刀捅人呢。”
不过，在马拉松式投票开始之初，该基金险些让整个进程彻底停滞——路易斯安那州共和党议员比尔·卡西迪等人希望确保共和党废除该基金的提案也能进行投票。
“我只是想最大化成功的几率，”卡西迪在谈到这次延误时说道。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
最终，尽管有十几名共和党议员投票支持北卡罗来纳州共和党议员汤姆·蒂利斯的修正案，还有多名议员支持卡西迪的提案，但所有试图阻止未来重启该基金的尝试均告失败。
当六名共和党议员与参议院民主党人联手，要求未经国会批准不得动工修建这座大型建筑时，舞厅安保资金的争议再次浮出水面。
此外，南卡罗来纳州共和党议员林赛·格雷厄姆曾试图将《拯救美国法案》附加到和解法案中，但遭到共和党议员的反对，最终也未能通过。
该法案目前已送交众议院，预计共和党将于下周在众议院通过该法案。
亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道负责报道美国参议院的记者。
Trump scores victory despite growing GOP divide after Senate passes $70B ICE, Border Patrol funding package
June 5, 2026 5:01am EDT / Fox News
The reconciliation bill funds ICE and Border Patrol for three and a half years and now heads to the House
By Alex Miller, Fox News
Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram reports on the pushback against President Donald Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization fund’ on ‘The Bottom Line.’
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Senate Republicans managed to stitch together a unified front to advance President Donald Trump’s roughly $70 billion immigration enforcement package, but divisions over the president’s agenda were laid bare after a marathon day of votes.
Passage of the budget reconciliation package geared toward funding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol for the next three and a half years closes a long, drawn out chapter in the Senate that began during the longest shutdown in history.
It’s a point that Senate Republicans tried to return to throughout the day, reiterating that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Democrats had forced their hands after refusing to fund immigration operations without a plethora of reforms.
DOZEN GOP REBELS FAIL TO PERMANENTLY KILL TRUMP’S CONTROVERSIAL $2B FUND
President Donald Trump speaks to the press in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 3, 2026.(Mandel Ngan/AFP)
“Democrats would not agree to anything, and eventually they walked away altogether, presumably because they thought that it would serve them better to have an issue for November,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said.
But the day, and preceding weeks, were dominated by a growing rift between Senate Republicans and the Trump administration that threatened to blow up the process altogether.
First, it was the inclusion of $1 billion in funding for security upgrades to Trump’s ballroom, which was later stripped out.
Then, it was the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) announcement that a nearly $2 billion “anti-weaponization” fund was being launched to allow people who felt targeted by the government to make a claim from the pot of taxpayer money.
GOP ADVANCES ICE FUNDING PACKAGE AFTER FORCING TRUMP’S CONTROVERSIAL $2B FUND INTO RETREAT
Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy questions National Institutes of Health Director Jayanta Bhattacharya during a hearing at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 3, 2026.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Several Senate Republicans worried that the money could be accessed by Jan. 6, 2021, rioters who were convicted of assaulting police.
Schumer and Democrats leaned into that open wound and spent much of the marathon, “vote-a-rama” vote series trying to spell a permanent end to the fund, despite acting Attorney General Todd Blanche vowing that the administration would no longer pursue it.
“Do we believe that Donald Trump, who has lied to us day in and day out, do we believe that he will be able to resist getting his sticky fingers in the slush fund when it would benefit himself and his family? No way, no way,” Schumer said.
GOP LEVERAGES ICE FUNDING PACKAGE TO MAKE TRUMP’S CONTROVERSIAL $2B FUND ‘NEVER EXIST’
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6393105820112
Many of the amendments pushed by Democrats placed Republicans in tough bids for reelection, Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Jon Husted, R-Ohio, and Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, into politically challenging positions.
Republicans tried to kill it, too, causing tensions on the Senate floor to rise.
“It’s not that tense,” Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said. “I mean, I’ve seen worse. Nobody’s stabbed anybody yet.”
Still, the process nearly came to a grinding halt because of the fund at the start of the marathon vote series when Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and others wanted to ensure that GOP attempts to end the fund would get a vote, too.
“I just wanted to optimize the chances of success,” Cassidy said of the delay.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Ultimately, despite a dozen Republicans voting for Sen. Thom Tillis’, R-N.C., amendment, and several voting for Cassidy’s, all attempts to thwart future bids to revive the fund failed.
The ballroom also came back into the picture when six Republicans joined Senate Democrats to prevent construction on the colossal structure from going forward without congressional approval.
Then there was an attempt by Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to attach the SAVE America Act to the reconciliation package, which met Republican resistance and ultimately failed, too.
The package now heads to the House, where Republicans are expected to pass it by next week.
Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.
-
年轻男性正远离特朗普。一场白宫UFC赛事能将他们拉回阵营吗？
2026-06-05T09:00:08.389Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/05/politics/ufc-white-house-dana-white-trump
终极格斗冠军赛（UFC）总裁达纳·怀特坚称，不要将白宫草坪上拔地而起的大型综合格斗竞技场误认为是政治表态。他在接受CNN采访时表示，这不过是美国建国250周年庆祝活动的一部分。
这一区分对怀特而言至关重要。尽管多年来一直是总统唐纳德·特朗普最知名的盟友之一——曾在最近三届共和党全国代表大会上发表演讲，帮助共和党在对特朗普重返白宫至关重要的年轻男性选民群体中打开局面——但怀特多次宣称自己已告别政坛。
如今，其中不少选民似乎和怀特一样急于远离政治。
随着6月14日——美国国旗日暨特朗普80岁生日——白宫南草坪上的多场UFC赛事筹备工作进入最后阶段，多项民调显示，特朗普在最有可能观看这场赛事的人群——年轻男性——中的支持率正大幅下滑。根据哈佛大学肯尼迪学院政治研究所最新的年轻人调查，29岁以下男性中仅有约四分之一认可特朗普的工作表现，远低于所有成年人的全国平均水平；其中仅15%的人认为国家发展方向正确。
这种支持率滑坡让共和党人正想方设法维系一个18个月前似乎预示着更广泛政治重组的执政联盟。一些曾助力放大特朗普吸引力的“男性圈子”人士如今已公开批评他。与此同时，另一个表明其文化影响力下滑的迹象是，原计划参与特朗普“自由250”系列音乐会的多数音乐人已退出，这不仅威胁到庆祝活动的举办，还为这场更大范围的庆祝活动增添了更多争议。
但怀特始终坚定支持这位多年老友。在特朗普在UFC核心受众中的支持率不断下滑之际，他精心策划了本月的这场赛事，以最大限度地吸引观众。赛事将有8名美国拳手参战，同时举办两场重量级冠军争夺战。比赛将在一座白宫场地前所未有的巨型爪形建筑下举行，约8.5万名观众将在椭圆广场观赛，赛前还将有扎克·布朗乐队的演唱会。
“我不在乎你是极端左翼、极端右翼，还是中间派，”怀特在拉斯维加斯UFC训练中心接受CNN记者萨拉·西德纳的深度采访时表示，这场采访是一部探讨UFC总裁与特朗普总统长达数十年合作关系的纪录片的一部分，“只要你是美国人，就会喜欢这场比赛。”
该纪录片将于美国东部时间6月7日周日晚8点在CNN的《安德森·库珀全程报道》栏目播出，并于6月8日周一在CNN全平台上线。
https://www.cnn.com/
“所有人都劝我别这么做”
对特朗普和怀特而言，6月14日的这场赛事标志着一段长达25年的合作关系达到顶峰。一切始于怀特首次收购UFC之时，当时特朗普同意在他的大西洋城赌场之一为这个鲜为人知的综合格斗联盟举办赛事。
“他很早就看懂了这项运动，”怀特说，“后来我们不断发展壮大，每当业务和我职业生涯中出现重大进展时，他都会联系我说：‘太棒了。我就知道你们会做到这一步。’”
这段友谊在2016年踏入政坛，当时特朗普邀请怀特在共和党全国代表大会上发表演讲。彼时，许多共和党人都与这位从真人秀明星转型而来的共和党总统候选人划清界限，怀特表示，顾问们都警告他不要接受邀请。
“几乎所有人都劝我别这么做，”他告诉CNN，“别做这事，别卷入政坛。”
但怀特表示，他觉得有必要支持一个在批评者——包括后来成为特朗普对手的已故参议员约翰·麦凯恩——将这项暴力运动斥为“人类斗鸡”时，曾给UFC机会的人。
怀特在特朗普第一任期及2020年选举后的混乱 aftermath 期间始终追随特朗普。在特朗普从棕榈滩的“流亡”状态中谋划卷土重来时，怀特鼓励他重新考虑媒体策略，争取传统保守派媒体之外的受众。
“我当时觉得，如果总统继续只在福克斯新闻露面，他赢不了，”怀特说，“但我知道，他可以坐下来做一档三小时的播客，让很多人觉得他亲切接地气。”
据负责特朗普竞选数字战略的顾问亚历克斯·布鲁塞维茨透露，在特朗普正式宣布再次参选之前，怀特就将他介绍给了Nelk Boys——一群拥有日益增长的在线粉丝群的加拿大恶作剧者。YouTube后来因选举虚假信息指控删除了他们与特朗普的采访视频，但布鲁塞维茨表示，这场争议反而扩大了Nelk Boys的影响力，同时提升了特朗普在迎合反建制和非主流观点的在线生态系统中的可信度。
怀特还给特朗普的顾问们列出了其他数字达人的名单，这些人的受众可能会觉得这位前总统颇具吸引力。在接下来的两年里，特朗普沉浸在播客、喜剧演员、流媒体主播和在线人物的数字世界中，这些人对疏离的年轻男性群体的影响力与日俱增。
“他给我介绍了很多我从未听说过的年轻人，”特朗普最近在接受《时代》周刊采访时表示，“我的意思是，我当时在接受20岁左右的年轻人的采访。我会说：‘你到底是从哪儿认识这些人的？’他们叫网红。但我确实做了很多。我和其中一些人成了朋友。他们都是好孩子，粉丝众多，一切都有帮助。”
这一策略助长了一种政治秩序正在改变的看法。如果说千禧一代在特朗普第一任期内定义了对他的抵抗，那么戴着“让美国再次伟大”（MAGA）帽子的Z世代男性则成为他政治卷土重来的标志性形象。
“我22岁的时候，甚至都不知道州长是谁，”怀特说，“现在这些22岁的年轻人对政治狂热得很。”
选举结果也印证了这一点：在2020年以两位数差距输掉30岁以下男性选民支持后，特朗普在2024年赢得了这一群体的支持。
但年轻男性很快就开始远离特朗普。
在他重返白宫的第一年中期，民调显示年轻选民的不满情绪日益高涨：他们为高昂的生活成本、日益难以负担的住房市场、特朗普的外交政策决策以及人工智能如何重塑他们的就业前景而苦恼。
哈佛大学肯尼迪学院政治研究所民调主任约翰·德拉·沃尔佩表示，年轻男性正变得越来越不意识形态化，越来越受自身生活经历的驱动——这种动态最初帮助了特朗普，但如今正导致他们对特朗普失去幻想。
“他们做决定的依据是自己的生活是否稳定、充满希望、负担得起，且在自己的掌控之中，”沃尔佩说，他已负责哈佛青年民调超过25年，“这就是为什么2024年有相当多的人转向支持共和党，也是他们在今年夏季中期选举前思考问题的视角。”
最新的哈佛青年民调显示，一半的年轻男性不确定是否会在11月的选举中投票，约四分之一的人对政治体系持总体怀疑态度。仅有10%的人自认为是MAGA支持者，仅27%的人希望共和党控制国会。
在这种背景下，特朗普正面临一些在2024年竞选期间帮助他接触新受众的人士的越来越多的批评。
乔·罗根——这位与怀特关系密切的播客主持人、UFC解说员，在2024年大选的最后时刻 endors 了特朗普——最近表示，与伊朗的冲突让特朗普的支持者感到“被背叛”。喜剧演员安德鲁·舒尔茨和西奥·冯都曾在大选期间在自己的网络节目中邀请特朗普做客，如今也越来越多地批评本届政府。
一名资深白宫顾问承认，在年轻男性群体中维持支持率面临挑战，但淡化了这些人物对塑造本次选举叙事的影响。
“还有其他方式可以接触这些受众，我们会做到的，”这位顾问说，“我们会不择手段地组建执政联盟。”
https://www.cnn.com/
从短期来看，这一努力包括即将到来的UFC赛事。赛事筹备工作在特朗普2024年胜选庆祝活动后几天就启动了，当时怀特还发表了胜利演讲。特朗普与怀特密切参与了筹备工作，怀特本周还到访了白宫。
根据益普索（Ipsos）提供给CNN的去年秋季发布的一项关于这项快速发展运动的调查，约四分之一的35岁以下男性认为自己是综合格斗爱好者。在线体育博彩公司BetMGM今年早些时候发布的收视数据显示，最有可能定期观看UFC赛事的年龄段是25至35岁，其中90%的观众为男性。
特朗普一直在积极宣传这场赛事，他在白宫接待了拳手，并在社交媒体上发布竞技场建设的最新进展。但这场赛事也招致了批评，包括罗根，他计划出席，但也提出了安全担忧，并称这场比赛“有点像噱头”。
沃尔佩表示，如果年轻选民继续感到经济和情感上的不安，重现2024年的政治和文化活力可能会很困难。
“文化活动能起到作用，但现实生活体验更重要，”他说。
即便如此，白宫官员仍乐观地认为，年轻男性不会倒向民主党——民主党在这一群体中的支持率仍处于极低水平。
资深民主党数字战略家罗布·弗莱厄蒂表示，他所在的政党未能抓住这一机会。例如，最近发布的民主党全国委员会复盘报告仅提及了一次年轻男性，而“播客”和“罗根”均未被提及。
弗莱厄蒂表示，民主党可以围绕人工智能打造一个民粹主义信息，激励那些对未来感到恐惧的年轻人，但他认为“民主党胆小怕事，害怕硅谷的资金，错失了一代人以来建立一个更公平、更公正社会的最大机遇”。
与此同时，怀特认为，许多年轻男性仍觉得民主党疏远了他们——并将UFC视为一种文化出口和政治信号。他也渴望将这项运动带到一个历史性的舞台上。
“我们玩得很开心，打破纪录，献上精彩的比赛，”怀特说，“这就是我们的本职。”
CNN的阿里尔·爱德华兹-莱维对本文亦有贡献。
Young men are leaving Trump. Can a UFC fight at the White House get them back in the ring?
2026-06-05T09:00:08.389Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/05/politics/ufc-white-house-dana-white-trump
Do not mistake the massive mixed martial arts arena rising out of the White House lawn for a political statement, insists Ultimate Fighting Championship President Dana White. It is, he told CNN, simply part of the celebration for America’s 250th birthday.
That distinction matters to White, who has repeatedly declared himself finished with politics despite spending years as one of President Donald Trump’s most visible allies — speaking at the last three Republican National Conventions and helping the GOP make inroads with the young male voters key to Trump’s return to the White House.
Many of those same voters appear just as eager as White to leave politics behind.
As final preparations are made for a slate of UFC fights on the White House South Lawn on June 14 – Flag Day and Trump’s 80th birthday – polls show Trump’s support is collapsing among the Americans most likely to watch the event: young men. About one-in-four men under the age of 29 approve of Trump’s job performance, well below the national average of all adults, according to the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School’s most recent survey of young adults, and just 15% of them think the country is headed in the right direction.
The erosion has left Republicans searching for ways to hold together a coalition that 18 months ago appeared to signal a broader political realignment. Some of the figures in the so-called manosphere who helped amplify Trump’s appeal are now openly criticizing him. Meanwhile, in another sign of his slipping cultural cache, most of the musical acts scheduled to participate in Trump’s Freedom 250 concert series have dropped out, threatening the festivities and injecting more controversy into the broader celebration.
White, however, has remained steadfast in support of his longtime friend. And he has designed this month’s event for maximum appeal at a time when Trump’s standing is deteriorating with UFC’s core audience. It features eight American fighters and two major title bouts. It will take place under a towering claw unlike anything constructed on the White House grounds, with about 85,000 people watching from the Ellipse, and it will be proceeded by a Zac Brown Band concert.
“I don’t care if you’re the furthest crazy left, or the furthest crazy right, or right down the middle,” White said in a wide-ranging interview with CNN’s Sara Sidner at the Las Vegas UFC Performance Institute, part of a documentary exploring the decadeslong partnership between the UFC president and President Trump. “If you are an American, you will enjoy this show.”
The documentary airs Sunday, June 7 at 8 p.m. ET on CNN’s “The Whole Story with Anderson Cooper.” It will be available on CNN All Access on Monday, June 8.
https://www.cnn.com/
‘Everybody told me not to do it’
For Trump and White, the June 14 event marks the culmination of a partnership that has spanned a quarter century, beginning when White first acquired UFC and Trump agreed to host fights for the little-known mixed-martial arts league at one of his Atlantic City casinos.
“He got it early,” White said, “and then as we continued to grow, every time something big would happen, to the business and in my career, he would reach out and say, ‘That’s incredible. I always knew you guys were going to do this.’”
The friendship entered the political arena in 2016, when Trump asked White to speak at the Republican National Convention. At the time, many Republicans were distancing themselves from the reality star-turned-GOP nominee, and White said advisers warned him against accepting the invitation.
“Literally everybody told me not to do it,” he told CNN. “Don’t do it, don’t get into politics.”
But White said he felt compelled to stand by someone who had given UFC a chance when critics — including the late Sen. John McCain, who would also become a Trump antagonist — had derided the violent sport as a form of human cockfighting.
White remained in Trump’s orbit through his first term and the chaotic aftermath of the 2020 election. And as Trump plotted a political comeback from exile in Palm Beach, White encouraged him to rethink his media strategy and seek out audiences beyond traditional conservative outlets.
“I felt like that if the president stayed on Fox he wasn’t going to win,” White said. “What I do know is he can sit on a three-hour podcast and be relatable to a lot of people.”
Before Trump had formally launched another campaign, White introduced him to the Nelk Boys, a group of Canadian pranksters with a growing online following, according to Alex Bruesewitz, the Trump adviser who oversaw the campaign’s digital strategy. YouTube later removed their interview with Trump over election misinformation claims, but Bruesewitz said the controversy only expanded the Nelk Boys’ reach while boosting Trump credibility within an online ecosystem that catered to anti-establishment and non-conformist views.
White gave Trump advisers a list of other digital mavens whose audience might find the former president compelling. Over the next two years, Trump immersed himself in the digital world of podcasters, comedians, streamers and online figures increasingly influential with disengaged young men.
“He introduced me to people I never heard of, young kids,” Trump recently told TIME. “I mean, I was being interviewed by 20-year-old kids. I’m saying, ‘Where the hell did you meet these people?’ They’re called influencers. But I did a lot. I became friendly with some of them. They’re nice kids, and they do have a big audience, and everything helps.”
The strategy fueled the perception of a changing political order. If millennials helped define the resistance to Trump during his first term, Gen Z men in MAGA hats became an enduring image of his political comeback.
“When I was 22, I couldn’t even tell you who the governor was,” White said. “Now these 22-year-olds are crazy political.”
The results were evident at the polls: Four years after losing men under 30 by double digits, Trump carried the demographic in 2024.
It didn’t take long for young men to begin slipping away from Trump.
By the middle of his first year back in office, polls showed growing frustration among young voters struggling with high living costs, an increasingly inaccessible housing market, Trump’s foreign policy decisions and how artificial intelligence was reshaping their job prospects.
John Della Volpe, director of polling at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Institute of Politics, said young men are becoming less ideological and more driven by their lived experiences — a dynamic that initially helped Trump but is now contributing to their disenchantment with him.
“They’re making decisions on whether their life feels stable, hopeful, affordable and in their control,” said Volpe, who has overseen the Harvard Youth Poll for more than 25 years. “That was the prism of why a significant number shifted to Republican support in 2024 and that’s the lens they’re carrying into the summer as we head toward midterms.”
The latest Harvard Youth Poll found that half of young men aren’t certain if they’ll vote in November, while roughly a quarter expressed overall cynicism with the political system. Just 10% identified themselves as MAGA and only 27% want to see Republicans control Congress.
Against this backdrop, Trump is facing mounting criticism from some of the figures who helped introduce him to new audiences during the 2024 campaign.
Joe Rogan, the podcaster and UFC commentator close to White who endorsed Trump in the final moments of the 2024 election, recently said the war with Iran has left Trump supporters feeling “betrayed.” Comedians Andrew Schulz and Theo Von, both of whom hosted Trump on their web shows during the election, have also increasingly criticized the administration.
A senior White House adviser acknowledged the challenge of maintaining support among younger men but downplayed the impact these figures will have in shaping the narrative of this election.
“There’s other ways to reach those audiences, and we will,” the adviser said, “And we will cobble a coalition together by hook or by crook.”
https://www.cnn.com/
In the near term, that effort includes the upcoming UFC fight. Planning for the fight card started just days after Trump’s 2024 victory celebration, which included a triumphant victory speech from White. Trump has been closely involved in the planning with White, who visited the White House this week.
About one-in-four men under 35 consider themselves fans of mixed-martial arts, according to a survey about the fast-growing sport released last fall provided to CNN by Ipsos. Viewership data published earlier this year by the online sportsbook BetMGM found the age group most likely to regularly watch UFC fights is 25- to 35-year-olds, and 90% of viewers are males.
Trump has regularly promoted the event, hosting fighters at the White House and posting updates on the arena construction to social media. But it has also drawn critics, including Rogan, who plans to attend but has raised security concerns and called the fights “kind of a gimmick.”
Volpe said recreating the political and cultural energy of 2024 may prove difficult if young voters continue to feel financially and emotionally unsettled.
“The cultural part works, but it’s trumped by the experience,” he said.
Even so, White House officials remain optimistic that young men will not drift toward Democrats, whose approval rating among the demographic remains deeply under water.
Rob Flaherty, a veteran Democratic digital strategist, said his party was failing to capitalize on the opening. The recently released Democratic National Committee autopsy, for example, referenced young men just once, while “podcast” and “Rogan” went unmentioned.
Flaherty said Democrats could build a populist message around AI that can animate young people scared about their futures, but argued “the Democratic Party is chickensh*t and scared of Silicon Valley money and is missing out on the biggest opportunity in a generation to build a more fair and just society.”
White, meanwhile, believes many young men still feel alienated by Democrats — and sees UFC as both a cultural outlet and political signal. And he’s eager to bring his sport to a historic stage.
“We have a blast, we break records, and we put on great fights,” White said. “That’s what we do.”
CNN’s Ariel Edwards-Levy contributed to this report.
-
民主党议员呼吁停止制作特朗普头像24K金币
2026年6月5日 美国东部时间早上6:00 / 《华盛顿邮报》
议员们认为，美国铸币局使用的黄金可能与非法海外来源有关。
【2026年3月18日，华盛顿特区】 美国财政部在网上公布了一款纪念金币的设计方案：一面为白头海雕，另一面为总统唐纳德·特朗普头像（美国财政部供图）
作者：莱利·贝金与丹·戴蒙德
参议院民主党议员周四敦促特朗普政府停止制作这款纪念建国250周年的纯金纪念币，该币将印有总统本人头像。议员们担忧，美国铸币局使用的部分黄金可能与外国贩毒集团有关联。
Democrats urge halt to production of Trump 24-karat gold coins
June 5, 2026 at 6:00 a.m. EDT / The Washington Post
The lawmakers argue that the gold in the U.S. Mint could have links to illegal foreign sources.
WASHINGTON, D.C., MARCH 18: Proposed designs for a gold coin featuring a bald eagle on one side and President Donald Trump on the other were posted online by the U.S. Treasury (U.S. Treasury)
By Riley Beggin and Dan Diamond
Senate Democrats on Thursday urged the Trump administration to halt production of a commemorative 250th anniversary solid gold coin that would bear the president’s image, citing concerns that some of the U.S. Mint’s gold could have links to foreign cartels.
-
美媒：航母福特号火灾严重程度超预期
2026年6月5日 18:39 / 联合早报
照片显示福特号航母返回弗吉尼亚州诺福克海军基地，船员协助其靠泊。 （法新社）
美国媒体星期三（6月4日）报道，今年3月美军最大航母福特号在打击伊朗期间发生的火灾，严重程度与破坏力远超美军此前描述。
新华社报道，当天公布的视频显示，航母船员睡铺被烧毁，仅剩金属残骸，天花板被烧穿并有电线垂落，地面散落大量灰烬。
船员称，事发时航母灭火系统未能正常启动，船员只能紧急灭火，火势持续约30小时，约600名船员因此失去睡铺。
今年3月，美军在对伊朗行动期间，福特号航母洗衣房起火。美国海军中央司令部当时称火势已受控，航母推进系统未受影响，仍可“全面运行”。
报道引述美国官员说法称，此次声明低估了火灾影响，事故已对航母作战能力造成冲击，或需至少一年才能恢复部署。
美媒：航母福特号火灾严重程度超预期
2026年6月5日 18:39 / 联合早报
照片显示福特号航母返回弗吉尼亚州诺福克海军基地，船员协助其靠泊。 （法新社）
美国媒体星期三（6月4日）报道，今年3月美军最大航母福特号在打击伊朗期间发生的火灾，严重程度与破坏力远超美军此前描述。
新华社报道，当天公布的视频显示，航母船员睡铺被烧毁，仅剩金属残骸，天花板被烧穿并有电线垂落，地面散落大量灰烬。
船员称，事发时航母灭火系统未能正常启动，船员只能紧急灭火，火势持续约30小时，约600名船员因此失去睡铺。
今年3月，美军在对伊朗行动期间，福特号航母洗衣房起火。美国海军中央司令部当时称火势已受控，航母推进系统未受影响，仍可“全面运行”。
报道引述美国官员说法称，此次声明低估了火灾影响，事故已对航母作战能力造成冲击，或需至少一年才能恢复部署。
-
首名勇闯法网决赛资格赛球员 波兰女将玛雅创历史
2026年6月5日 15:42 / 联合早报
玛雅在取胜后倒地庆祝，感到难以置信。 （路透社）
（巴黎法新电）玛雅·赫瓦林斯卡（Maja Chwalinska）在新加坡时间星期四（6月4日）创造法国网球公开赛历史。这名世界排名第114位的波兰女将，成为职业时代首名闯入法网决赛的资格赛球员，她将在决赛中对阵俄罗斯天才少女米拉·安德烈娃（Mirra Andreeva）。
玛雅在半决赛中以7比6（4）、6比4击败俄罗斯女将戴安娜·施奈德（Diana Shnaider），晋级决赛。后者作为25号种子在前一轮爆冷淘汰了世界第一阿丽娜·萨巴伦卡（Aryna Sabalenka）。
在惊险赢下首盘后，第二盘的比分依然胶着，但在戴安娜喊出医疗暂停进行背部按摩后，玛雅很快连下三局，锁定胜利。
玛雅（右）和戴安娜在赛后相互致意。（路透社）
如果玛雅能在决赛中击败米拉，她将成为公开赛时代中，继2021年的美网冠军艾玛·拉杜卡努（Emma Raducanu）后，第二名赢得大满贯冠军的女子资格赛球员。
黑马之旅如梦似幻
这名24岁的球员说，她在法国首都巴黎的征程“就像一场梦”。赛后在菲利普·沙特里耶球场上雷鸣般的掌声中，她补充说：“我不知道发生了什么，我只是……我不知道该说什么。对不起，我只是非常高兴。”
这是玛雅首次进入法网正赛，她在罗兰加洛斯为期三周的比赛中已经赢得了九场比赛，包括上个月进行的三轮资格赛。
玛雅承认在赢下2小时10分钟的半决赛后，她的身体状况“不佳”。她补充说：“我的意思是，日复一日地与世界上最好的球员比赛，这太有挑战性了，但这是大满贯，所以你只需要每天都尽力而为。
“但我一点也不想抱怨！”
玛雅排名将狂升百名之多
玛雅在之前的大满贯之旅（2022年温布登锦标赛）中只赢过一场比赛，在罗兰加洛斯之前也只赢过两场巡回赛级别的红土场比赛。
在晋级四强的路上，玛雅在首轮击败了中国的奥运金牌得主郑钦文，随后又击败了23号种子埃莉斯·梅尔滕斯（Elise Mertens）、前世界第三的玛利亚·萨卡里（Maria Sakkari）、法国本土希望戴安娜·帕里（Diane Parry）和22号种子安娜·卡林斯卡娅（Anna Kalinskaya）。
俄罗斯的戴安娜（中下）须在赛中接受背部治疗。（法新社）
玛雅的排名预计将至少攀升至职业生涯新高的第21位。
虽然出局，但戴安娜谈到她在大满贯中的最佳表现时说：“我为自己在这里取得的成就感到非常自豪。
“（玛雅）打得非常出色，她今天绝对配得上这场胜利并进入决赛。”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfHeYAm0GuA
点击《联合早报》世界杯专页，获知世界杯实时比分和最新新闻等资讯。
首名勇闯法网决赛资格赛球员 波兰女将玛雅创历史
2026年6月5日 15:42 / 联合早报
玛雅在取胜后倒地庆祝，感到难以置信。 （路透社）
（巴黎法新电）玛雅·赫瓦林斯卡（Maja Chwalinska）在新加坡时间星期四（6月4日）创造法国网球公开赛历史。这名世界排名第114位的波兰女将，成为职业时代首名闯入法网决赛的资格赛球员，她将在决赛中对阵俄罗斯天才少女米拉·安德烈娃（Mirra Andreeva）。
玛雅在半决赛中以7比6（4）、6比4击败俄罗斯女将戴安娜·施奈德（Diana Shnaider），晋级决赛。后者作为25号种子在前一轮爆冷淘汰了世界第一阿丽娜·萨巴伦卡（Aryna Sabalenka）。
在惊险赢下首盘后，第二盘的比分依然胶着，但在戴安娜喊出医疗暂停进行背部按摩后，玛雅很快连下三局，锁定胜利。
玛雅（右）和戴安娜在赛后相互致意。（路透社）
如果玛雅能在决赛中击败米拉，她将成为公开赛时代中，继2021年的美网冠军艾玛·拉杜卡努（Emma Raducanu）后，第二名赢得大满贯冠军的女子资格赛球员。
黑马之旅如梦似幻
这名24岁的球员说，她在法国首都巴黎的征程“就像一场梦”。赛后在菲利普·沙特里耶球场上雷鸣般的掌声中，她补充说：“我不知道发生了什么，我只是……我不知道该说什么。对不起，我只是非常高兴。”
这是玛雅首次进入法网正赛，她在罗兰加洛斯为期三周的比赛中已经赢得了九场比赛，包括上个月进行的三轮资格赛。
玛雅承认在赢下2小时10分钟的半决赛后，她的身体状况“不佳”。她补充说：“我的意思是，日复一日地与世界上最好的球员比赛，这太有挑战性了，但这是大满贯，所以你只需要每天都尽力而为。
“但我一点也不想抱怨！”
玛雅排名将狂升百名之多
玛雅在之前的大满贯之旅（2022年温布登锦标赛）中只赢过一场比赛，在罗兰加洛斯之前也只赢过两场巡回赛级别的红土场比赛。
在晋级四强的路上，玛雅在首轮击败了中国的奥运金牌得主郑钦文，随后又击败了23号种子埃莉斯·梅尔滕斯（Elise Mertens）、前世界第三的玛利亚·萨卡里（Maria Sakkari）、法国本土希望戴安娜·帕里（Diane Parry）和22号种子安娜·卡林斯卡娅（Anna Kalinskaya）。
俄罗斯的戴安娜（中下）须在赛中接受背部治疗。（法新社）
玛雅的排名预计将至少攀升至职业生涯新高的第21位。
虽然出局，但戴安娜谈到她在大满贯中的最佳表现时说：“我为自己在这里取得的成就感到非常自豪。
“（玛雅）打得非常出色，她今天绝对配得上这场胜利并进入决赛。”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfHeYAm0GuA
点击《联合早报》世界杯专页，获知世界杯实时比分和最新新闻等资讯。