行业团体警告，特朗普支持的条款可能导致”建后出租”（build-to-rent）开发项目停滞，进而减少住房供应
作者：亚历克斯·米勒
福克斯新闻
发布时间：2026年3月11日 美国东部时间晚上7:06
[常识解决方案：民主党和共和党联手应对住房危机]
纽约州民主党众议员乔希·莱利（Josh Riley）和北卡罗来纳州共和党人帕特·哈里根（Pat Harrigan）讨论两党如何努力实现美国梦。
新功能：您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章！
收听本文
3分钟
[](https://beyondwords.io/?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com&utm_medium=player&utm_campaign=7893)
参议院周三进一步推进一项旨在提高住房可负担性的全面住房法案，但一项由特朗普支持的禁止机构投资者购买独栋住宅的条款正成为争议焦点。
议员们周三扫清了该法案的另一道程序障碍，为周四离开华盛顿前可能进行的最终投票铺平了道路。
《21世纪住房法案》上月以390票对9票的两党支持在众议院通过。该立法包含一系列旨在增加经济适用房供应的措施。
[众议院通过两党住房法案，特朗普聚焦可负担性危机]
2026年3月9日，星期一，佛罗里达州多拉的特朗普国家多拉迈阿密度假村，唐纳德·特朗普总统在新闻发布会上就对伊朗的军事打击发表讲话。（马克·谢费尔宾/美联社照片）
参议院银行、住房和城市事务委员会主席蒂姆·斯科特（R-S.C.）与该委员会的最高民主党人伊丽莎白·沃伦（D-Mass.）联手在参议院推进并修改该法案。
“当唐纳德·特朗普总统、伊丽莎白·沃伦以及参议院共和党人都能在住房法案上达成共识时，这表明如果我们搁置党派政治，专注于影响美国民众的问题，就能取得成果，”斯科特在接受CNBC” Squawk Box”采访时表示。
在原始版本中，该法案主要旨在帮助首次购房者和低收入美国人进入住房市场或获得更多负担得起的住房选择。
[两党计划旨在让数百万首次购房者重新实现美国梦]
2025年2月27日星期四，南卡罗来纳州共和党议员蒂姆·斯科特在迪尔森大楼参加参议院银行、住房和城市事务委员会确认听证会。（汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ-滚动呼叫公司通过盖蒂图片社）
但最初的法案缺乏特朗普想要的一项关键政策：禁止对冲基金或大型企业等机构投资者购买独栋住宅。特朗普今年早些时候签署了一项行政命令禁止此类行为，并在国情咨文演讲中敦促国会将其法典化。
“我要求国会将这一禁令永久化，因为住房是为人民提供的——事实上，这才是我们想要的，”特朗普说，”我们要的是人民的住房，不是企业的住房。”
斯科特和沃伦在法案中加入了这一条款。如果通过，该一揽子计划还将纳入《住房道路法案》（ROAD to Housing Act）中的若干政策，该法案是参议院另一项此前陷入停滞的住房提案。
该条款将禁止大规模投资者购买独栋住宅，并要求超过特定所有权门槛的公司在七年内剥离相关资产。
[支持特朗普的团体发布关键住房倡议蓝图，重点突出顶级 MAGA 影响力人物]
夏威夷州民主党参议员布莱恩·沙茨警告称，参议院两党住房一揽子计划存在”问题”。（比尔·克拉克/CQ-滚动呼叫公司通过盖蒂图片社）
但机构投资者禁令引起了部分参议院民主党人和行业利益相关者的担忧，他们认为这可能会导致”建后出租”（build-to-rent）住房项目减少。
夏威夷州民主党参议员布莱恩·沙茨在参议院表示，该法案”存在问题”。他辩称，禁止企业和对冲基金购买独栋住宅的条款被写成了一种”会迫使任何拥有并出租超过350套单户住宅或联排别墅的人在七年内出售”的形式。
“这简直没有任何道理，”沙茨说，”问题在于这项条款的措辞方式是为了针对对冲基金问题，但他们写错了。”
“所以，机构投资者的定义实质上是说，任何拥有并运营超过350套出租单元的人——这太荒谬了，”他继续说道。
住房和租赁行业的几位成员在给斯科特和沃伦的信中写道，七年期条款将”实际上关闭’建后出租’开发项目，导致住房供应减少，租房者选择更少”。
亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字版撰写美国参议院报道的记者。
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6388402266112
https://beyondwords.io/?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com&utm_medium=player&utm_campaign=7893
Bipartisan housing push advances, but Trump-backed investor ban faces resistance
Industry groups warn Trump-backed provision could shut down build-to-rent development and reduce housing supply
By Alex Miller
Fox News
Published March 11, 2026 7:06pm EDT
[COMMON SENSE SOLUTION’: Democrats and Republicans come together to help the housing crisis]
Rep. Josh Riley, D-N.Y., and Pat Harrigan, R-N.C., discuss ways both parties are trying to make the American dream achievable.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Listen to this article
3 min
[](https://beyondwords.io/?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com&utm_medium=player&utm_campaign=7893)
The Senate moved closer Wednesday to advancing a sweeping housing package aimed at boosting affordability, but a Trump-backed provision banning institutional investors from buying single-family homes is emerging as a flashpoint.
Lawmakers cleared another procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, setting up a likely final vote before they leave Washington on Thursday.
The Housing for the 21st Century Act passed the House last month in a 390-9 bipartisan vote. The legislation includes a wide-ranging slate of measures designed to increase the supply of affordable housing.
[HOUSE PASSES BIPARTISAN HOUSING BILL AS TRUMP ZEROES IN ON AFFORDABILITY CRISIS]
President Donald Trump speaks about the military strikes against Iran, at a news conference, Monday, March 9, 2026, at Trump National Doral Miami in Doral, Florida.(Mark Schiefelbein/AP Photo)
Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., the chair of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., its top Democrat, teamed up to advance and modify the bill in the Senate.
“When President Donald Trump and Elizabeth Warren and Senate Republicans can all come to the same place on a housing bill, it shows that if you put partisan politics aside and focus on the issues impacting the American people, you can get results,” Scott told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”
In its original form, the legislation was primarily intended to help first-time homebuyers and lower-income Americans enter the housing market or gain access to more affordable housing options.
[BIPARTISAN PLAN AIMS TO MAKE THE AMERICAN DREAM AFFORDABLE AGAIN FOR MILLIONS OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS]
Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., arrives for a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee confirmation hearing in Dirksen building on Thursday, February 27, 2025.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
But the initial bill lacked a key policy Trump wanted: a ban on institutional investors, such as hedge funds or large corporations, buying single-family homes. Trump earlier this year signed an executive order banning the practice and urged Congress to codify it during his State of the Union address.
“I’m asking Congress to make that ban permanent because homes for people — really, that’s what we want,” Trump said. “We want homes for people, not for corporations.”
Scott and Warren added that provision to the bill. If passed, the package would also incorporate several policies from the ROAD to Housing Act, a separate Senate housing proposal that previously stalled.
The provision would prohibit large-scale investors from purchasing single-family homes and would require companies that exceed a certain ownership threshold to divest within seven years.
[PRO-TRUMP GROUP UNLEASHES BLUEPRINT FOR CRUCIAL HOUSING INITIATIVE FEATURING TOP MAGA INFLUENCER]
Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, warned that they was a “problem” with the Senate’s bipartisan housing package.(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
But the institutional investor ban is drawing concerns from some Senate Democrats and industry stakeholders, who argue it could eliminate build-to-rent housing units.
Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said on the Senate floor that “there is a problem” with the bill. He argued the ban on corporations and hedge funds buying single-family homes was written in a way that would force “anybody who owns and rents out more than 350 units, single family or duplexes” to sell after a seven-year period.
“There’s literally no reason for this,” Schatz said. “And the problem is that it was written in such a way that it was trying to capture the hedge fund problem, but they wrote it wrong.”
[CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP]
“And so the definition of institutional investor says, essentially, anyone who owns and operates more than 350 units to rent — that’s bananas,” he continued.
Several members of the housing and rental industry wrote in a letter to Scott and Warren that the seven-year clause would “effectively shut down build-to-rent development, leading to less supply and fewer options for renters.”
Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6388402266112
https://beyondwords.io/?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com&utm_medium=player&utm_campaign=7893
发表回复